Book contents
- The Handbook of Behavior Change
- The Handbook of Behavior Change
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Sidebars
- Contributors
- 1 Changing Behavior: A Theory- and Evidence-Based Approach
- Part I Theory and Behavior Change
- Part II Methods and Processes of Behavior Change: Intervention Development, Application, and Translation
- 19 Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Behavior Change Interventions: A Ten-Task Guide
- 20 Moving from Theoretical Principles to Intervention Strategies: Applying the Experimental Medicine Approach
- 21 Developing Behavior Change Interventions
- 22 Evaluation of Behavior Change Interventions
- 23 Implementation Science and Translation in Behavior Change
- 24 Engagement of Stakeholders in the Design, Evaluation, and Implementation of Complex Interventions
- 25 Maximizing User Engagement with Behavior Change Interventions
- 26 Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations of Behavior Change Interventions
- 27 Addressing Underserved Populations and Disparities in Behavior Change
- 28 Behavior Change in Community Contexts
- 29 Changing Behavior in the Digital Age
- 30 Critical and Qualitative Approaches to Behavior Change
- Part III Behavior Change Interventions: Practical Guides to Behavior Change
- Index
- References
23 - Implementation Science and Translation in Behavior Change
from Part II - Methods and Processes of Behavior Change: Intervention Development, Application, and Translation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2020
Book contents
- The Handbook of Behavior Change
- The Handbook of Behavior Change
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Sidebars
- Contributors
- 1 Changing Behavior: A Theory- and Evidence-Based Approach
- Part I Theory and Behavior Change
- Part II Methods and Processes of Behavior Change: Intervention Development, Application, and Translation
- 19 Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Behavior Change Interventions: A Ten-Task Guide
- 20 Moving from Theoretical Principles to Intervention Strategies: Applying the Experimental Medicine Approach
- 21 Developing Behavior Change Interventions
- 22 Evaluation of Behavior Change Interventions
- 23 Implementation Science and Translation in Behavior Change
- 24 Engagement of Stakeholders in the Design, Evaluation, and Implementation of Complex Interventions
- 25 Maximizing User Engagement with Behavior Change Interventions
- 26 Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations of Behavior Change Interventions
- 27 Addressing Underserved Populations and Disparities in Behavior Change
- 28 Behavior Change in Community Contexts
- 29 Changing Behavior in the Digital Age
- 30 Critical and Qualitative Approaches to Behavior Change
- Part III Behavior Change Interventions: Practical Guides to Behavior Change
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter provides an overview of implementation science approaches relevant for behavior change interventions, including those developed to (1) identify and explain implementation processes (e.g., the Ottawa model for research use); (2) identify implementation determinants, including barriers and facilitators (e.g., the consolidated framework for implementation research); and (3) select implementation outcomes and conduct the evaluation of implementation processes (e.g., the RE-AIM model). Implementation approaches may be further divided into implementation theories, evidence-based frameworks, and taxonomies used to identify and manage key aspects of implementation that contribute to determining the efficacy of behavior change interventions delivered in “real-world” contexts. The chapter concludes with an example of a translational research model providing a set of overarching descriptions of the processes linking basic science findings with the evidence-based applications.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Handbook of Behavior Change , pp. 333 - 348Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Abraham, C., Johnson, B. T., de Bruin, M., & Luszczynska, A. (2014). Enhancing reporting of behavior change intervention evaluations. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 66, S293–S299. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000231Google Scholar
Bartholomew Eldredge, L. K., Markham, C. M., Ruiter, R. A. C., Fernández, M. E., Kok, G., & Parcel, G. S. (2016). Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bauer, M. S., Damschroder, L., Hagedorn, H., Smith, J., & Kilbourne, A. M. (2015). An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychology, 3, 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birken, S. A., Powell, B. J., Shea, C. M. et al. (2017). Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: Results from an international survey. Implementation Science, 12, 124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0656-yGoogle Scholar
Cane, J., O’Connor, D., & Michie, S. (2012). Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation. Implementation Science, 7, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-37Google Scholar
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E. et al. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50Google Scholar
Drolet, B. C., & Lorenzi, N. M. (2011). Translational research: Understanding the continuum from bench to bedside. Translational Research, 157, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2010.10.002Google Scholar
Eccles, M. P., & Mittman, B. S. (2006). Welcome to implementation science. Implementation Science, 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-1Google Scholar
Glasgow, R. E., Klesges, L. M., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Bull, S. S., & Estabrooks, P. (2004). The future of health behavior change research: What is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2701_2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1322–1237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, I. D., & Logan, J. (2004). Innovations in knowledge transfer and continuity of care. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 36, 89–103.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Bate, P., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2005). Diffusion of innovations in service organisations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82, 581–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagger, M. S., & Weed, M. E. (2019). DEBATE: Do behavioral interventions work in the real world? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16, 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0795-4Google Scholar
Horodyska, K., Luszczynska, A., Hayes, C. B. et al. (2015). Implementation conditions for diet and physical activity interventions and policies: An umbrella review. BMC Public Health, 15, 1250. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2585-5Google Scholar
Horodyska, K., Luszczynska, A., van den Berg, M. et al. (2015). Good practice characteristics of diet and physical activity interventions and policies: An umbrella review. BMC Public Health, 15, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1354-9Google Scholar
Leeman, J., Birken, S. A., Powell, B. J., Rohweder, C., & Shea, C. M. (2017). Beyond “implementation strategies”: Classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice. Implementation Science, 12, 125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0657-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, C. C., Fischer, S., Weiner, B. J., Stanick, C., Kim, M., & Martinez, R. G. (2015). Outcomes for implementation science: An enhanced systematic review of instruments using evidence-based rating criteria. Implementation Science, 10, 155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0342-xGoogle Scholar
Logan, J., & Graham, I. D. (2010). The Ottawa model of research use. In Bucknall, J. R. M. (Ed.), Models and Frameworks for Implementing Evidence-Based Practice: Evidence to Action (pp. 83–108). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Luebbers, E. L., Dolansky, M. A., Vehovec, A., & Petty, G. (2017). Implementation and evaluation of community-based interprofessional learning activity. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31, 91–97, https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2016.1237936CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luszczynska, A., Horodyska, K., Zarychta, K., Liszewska, N., Knoll, N., & Scholz, U. (2016). Planning and self-efficacy interventions encouraging replacing energy-dense foods intake with fruit and vegetable: A longitudinal experimental study. Psychology and Health, 31, 40–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2015.1070156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michie, S., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Lawton, R., Parker, D., & Walker, A. (2005). Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: A consensus approach. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.011155Google Scholar
Muellmann, S., Steenbock., B., De Cocker, K. et al. (2017). Views of policy makers and health promotion professionals on factors facilitating implementation and maintenance of interventions and policies promoting physical activity and healthy eating: results of the DEDIPAC project. BMC Public Health, 17, 932. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4929-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nathan, N., Yoong, S. L., Sutherland, R. et al. (2016). Effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to enhance implementation of a healthy canteen policy in Australian primary schools: A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13, 106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0431-5Google Scholar
Nilsen, P. (2015). Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science, 10, 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0Google Scholar
Ory, M. G., Jordan, P. J., & Bazzarre, T. (2002). The behavior change consortium: Setting the stage for a new century of health behavior-change research. Health Education Research, 17, 500–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/17.5.500Google Scholar
Peters, G. -J. Y., de Bruin, M., & Crutzen, R. (2015). Everything should be as simple as possible, but no simpler: Towards a protocol for accumulating evidence regarding the active content of health behaviour change interventions. Health Psychology Review, 9, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2013.848409Google Scholar
Pfadenhauer, L. M., Gerhardus, A., Mozygemba, K. et al. (2017). Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: The Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework. Implementation Science, 12, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0552-5Google Scholar
Proctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Gilsson, C., & Mittman, B. (2009). Implementation research in mental health services: An emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 36, 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4Google Scholar
Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R. et al. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 38, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7Google Scholar
Rabin, B. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2012). Developing the terminology for dissemination and implementation research. In Brownson, R., C, Colditz, G. A., & Proctor, E. K, (Eds.), Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health (pp. 23–51). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reilly, K., Nathan, N., Grady, A. et al. (2019). Barriers to implementation of a healthy canteen policy: A survey using the theoretical domains framework. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.218Google Scholar
Rubio, D. M., Schoenbaum, E. E., Lee, L. S. et al. (2010). Defining translational research: Implications for training. Academic Medicine, 85, 470–475. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ccd618.Google Scholar
Rutter, H., Savona, N., Glonti, K. et al. (2017). The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health. Lancet, 390, 2602–2604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31267-9Google Scholar
SIRC (Society for Implementation Research Collaboration). (2018). The SIRC Instrument Review Project (IRP): A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Implementation Science Instruments. www.societyforimplementationresearchcollaboration.org/sirc-projects/sirc-instrument-projectGoogle Scholar
Steckler, A., Goodman, R. M., McLeroy, K. R., Davis, S., & Koch, G. (1992). Measuring the diffusion of innovative health promotion programs. American Journal of Health Promotion, 6, 214–224. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-6.3.214Google Scholar
Tabak, R. G., Khoong, E. C., Chambers, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2012). Bridging research and practice: Models for dissemination and implementation research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43, 337–350.Google Scholar