Book contents
- The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law
- Series page
- The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- A note on the texts
- Introduction
- 1 Kelsen on the nature and development of constitutional adjudication
- 2 The guardian of the constitution: Schmitt’s argument against constitutional review
- 3 The guardian of the constitution: Schmitt on pluralism and the president as the guardian of the constitution
- 4 Who ought to be the guardian of the constitution? Kelsen’s reply to Schmitt
- 5 Prussia contraReich: Schmitt’s closing statement in Leipzig
- 6 Kelsen on the judgment of theStaatsgerichtshofof 25 October 1932
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2015
Edited and translated by
Book contents
- The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law
- Series page
- The Guardian of the Constitution: Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- A note on the texts
- Introduction
- 1 Kelsen on the nature and development of constitutional adjudication
- 2 The guardian of the constitution: Schmitt’s argument against constitutional review
- 3 The guardian of the constitution: Schmitt on pluralism and the president as the guardian of the constitution
- 4 Who ought to be the guardian of the constitution? Kelsen’s reply to Schmitt
- 5 Prussia contraReich: Schmitt’s closing statement in Leipzig
- 6 Kelsen on the judgment of theStaatsgerichtshofof 25 October 1932
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Guardian of the ConstitutionHans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law, pp. 266 - 273Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015