Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:26:17.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2023

Daniela Alaattinoğlu
Daniela Alaattinoğlu
Affiliation:
University of Turku, Finland
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Grievance Formation, Rights and Remedies
Involuntary Sterilisation and Castration in the Nordics, 1930s–2020s
 , pp. 212 - 264
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

The Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac, Radomir Kovac and Zoran Vukovic. Trial Chamber II. IT-96-23-T & IT-96-23/1-T (22 February 2001).Google Scholar
The Prosecutor v. Eliézer Niyitegeka. Trial Chamber. ICTR-96-14-T (16 May 2003).Google Scholar
The Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu. Appeals Chamber. Case No. ICTR-96-4-A (1 June 2001).Google Scholar
The Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu. Trial Chamber. ICTR-96-4-T (2 September 1998).Google Scholar
Andrea Francovich and Danila Bonifaci v. Italian Republic. C-6/90 and C-9/90 (19 November 1991).Google Scholar
K.B. v. NHS Pensions Agency. C-117/01 (7 January 2004).Google Scholar
P v. S and Cornwall County Council. C-13/94 (30 April 1996).Google Scholar
Sarah Margaret Richards v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. C-423/04 (27 April 2006).Google Scholar
Roetzheim v. Germany. Application No. 31177/96 (23 October 1997).Google Scholar
A.D. and Others v. Georgia. Application Nos. 57864/17, 79087/17 & 55353/19 (1 December 2022).Google Scholar
A.P., Garçon and Nicot v. France. Application Nos. 79885/12, 52471/13 & 52596/13 (6 April 2017).Google Scholar
B v. France. Application No. 13343/87 (25 March 1992).Google Scholar
Backlund v. Finland. Application No. 36498/05 (6 July 2010).Google Scholar
Červeňáková v. the Czech Republic. Application No. 26853/09 (23 October 2012).Google Scholar
Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom. Application No. 28957/95 (11 July 2002).Google Scholar
Cossey v. the United Kingdom. Application No. 10843/84 (27 September 1990).Google Scholar
Csoma v. Romania. Application No. 8759/05 (15 January 2013).Google Scholar
D.H. v. the Czech Republic. Application No. 57325/00 (13 November 2007).Google Scholar
Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom. Application No. 7525/76 (22 October 1981).Google Scholar
E v. Norway. Application No. 11701/85 (29 August 1990).Google Scholar
Eerikäinen and Others v. Finland. Application No. 3514/02 (10 February 2009).Google Scholar
G and E v. Norway. Application Nos. 9278/81 & 9415/81 (3 October 1983).Google Scholar
G.H. v. Hungary. Application No. 54041/14 (9 June 2015).Google Scholar
G.B. and R.B. v. the Republic of Moldova. Application No. 16761/09 (18 December 2012).Google Scholar
Grönmark v. Finland. Application No. 17038/04 (6 July 2010).Google Scholar
Hämäläinen v. Finland. Application No. 3735/09 (16 July 2014).Google Scholar
Hokkanen v. Finland. Application No. 19823/92 (23 September 1994).Google Scholar
I v. the United Kingdom. Application No. 25680/94 (11 July 2002).Google Scholar
I.G. and Others v. Slovakia. Application No. 15966/04 (13 November 2012).Google Scholar
Janowiec and Others v. Russia. Application Nos. 55508/07 & 29520/09 (21 October 2013).Google Scholar
Joëlle Gauer and Others v. France. Application No. 61521/08 (23 October 2012).Google Scholar
Johansson v. Finland. Application No. 10163/02 (6 September 2007).Google Scholar
Juppala v. Finland. Application No. 18620/03 (2 December 2008).Google Scholar
K.H. and Others v. Slovakia. Application No. 32881/04 (28 April 2009).Google Scholar
Kolk and Kislyiy v. Estonia. Application Nos. 23052/04 & 24018/04 (17 January 2006).Google Scholar
K.U. v. Finland. Application No. 2872/02 (2 December 2008).Google Scholar
L v. Lithuania. Application No. 27527/03 (11 September 2003).Google Scholar
L.H. v. Latvia. Application No. 52019/07 (29 April 2014).Google Scholar
Mocanu and Others v. Romania. Application Nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 & 32431/08 (17 September 2014).Google Scholar
M.P. v. Finland. Application No. 36487/12 (15 December 2016).Google Scholar
Muttilainen v. Finland. Application No. 18358/02 (22 May 2007).Google Scholar
N.B. v. Slovakia. Application No. 29518/10 (12 June 2012).Google Scholar
Norris v. Ireland. Application No. 10581/83 (26 October 1988).Google Scholar
Nunez v. France. Application No. 18367/06 (27 May 2008).Google Scholar
Oršuš and Others v. Croatia. Application No. 15766/03 (16 March 2010).Google Scholar
Rees v. the United Kingdom. Application No. 9532/81 (17 October 1987).Google Scholar
Ristamäki and Korvola v. Finland. Application No. 66456/09 (29 October 2013).Google Scholar
R.K. v. the Czech Republic. Application No. 7883/08 (27 November 2012).Google Scholar
Schlumpf v. Switzerland. Application No. 29002/06 (8 January 2009).Google Scholar
Sheffield and Horsham v. the United Kingdom. Application Nos. 22985/93 & 23390/94 (30 July 1998).Google Scholar
Šilih v. Slovenia. Application No. 71463/01 (9 April 2009).Google Scholar
Soares de Melo v. Portugal. Application No. 72850/14 (16 February 2016).Google Scholar
Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden. Application Nos. 7151/75 & 7152/75 (23 September 1982).Google Scholar
Thiermann and Others v. Norway. Application No. 18712/03 (8 March 2007).Google Scholar
Van Kück v. Germany. Application No. 35968/97 (12 June 2003).Google Scholar
Van Osterwijk v. Belgium. Application No. 7654/76 (6 November 1980).Google Scholar
V.C. v. Slovakia. Application No. 18968/07 (8 November 2011).Google Scholar
Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland. Application No. 63235/00 (19 April 2007).Google Scholar
X and Y v. the Netherlands. Application No. 8978/80 (26 March 1985).Google Scholar
X and Y v. Romania. Applications Nos. 2145/16 & 20607/16 (19 January 2021).Google Scholar
X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom. Application No. 21830/93 (22 April 1997).Google Scholar
Y.Y. v. Turkey. Application No. 14793/08 (10 March 2015).Google Scholar
Fernández Ortega et al v. Mexico. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Series C No. 215 (30 August 2010).Google Scholar
García Lucero et al v. Chile. Preliminary Objection, Merits and Reparations. Series C No. 267 (28 August 2013).Google Scholar
Gelman v. Uruguay. Merits and Reparations. Series C No. 221 (24 February 2011).Google Scholar
González et al (‘Cotton Field’) v. Mexico. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Series C No. 205 (16 November 2009).Google Scholar
I.V. v. Bolivia. Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas [Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs]. Series C No. 329 (30 November 2016).Google Scholar
Velásquez Paiz and Others v. Guatemala. Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas [Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs]. Series C No. 307 (19 November 2015).Google Scholar
The Factory at Chorzów (Claim for Indemnity) Germany v. Poland (13 September 1928), PCIJ Reports Series A No. 17.Google Scholar
Poland v. Höss. 7 LRTWC 11 (11–29 March 1947).Google Scholar
United States of America v. Greifelt et al. 13 LRTWC 1 (10 October 1947–10 March 1948).Google Scholar
United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al. 4 LRTWC 91–3 (21 November 1946–20 August 1947).Google Scholar
Gerasimov v. Kazakhstan, Communication No. 433/2010 (10 July 2012).Google Scholar
A.S. v. Hungary, Communication No. 4/2004 (14 August 2006).Google Scholar
J.D. et al v. the Czech Republic. Communication No. 102/2016 (16 July 2019).Google Scholar
Transgender Europe and ILGA-Europe, Complaint No. 117/2015 (15 May 2018).Google Scholar
M.T. v. Uzbekistan. Communication No. 2234/2013 (23 July 2015).Google Scholar
I.V. v. Bolivia, Case 12.655 (merits). Report 72/14 (15 August 2014).Google Scholar
María Mamérita Mestanza Chávez v. Peru, Case 12.191 (friendly settlement). Report 71/03 (22 October 2003).Google Scholar
Opinión Consultativa [Advisory Opinion], OC-24/17 (24 November 2017).Google Scholar
Gerasimov v. Kazakhstan, Communication No. 433/2010 (10 July 2012).Google Scholar
A.S. v. Hungary, Communication No. 4/2004 (14 August 2006).Google Scholar
J.D. et al v. the Czech Republic. Communication No. 102/2016 (16 July 2019).Google Scholar
Transgender Europe and ILGA-Europe, Complaint No. 117/2015 (15 May 2018).Google Scholar
M.T. v. Uzbekistan. Communication No. 2234/2013 (23 July 2015).Google Scholar
I.V. v. Bolivia, Case 12.655 (merits). Report 72/14 (15 August 2014).Google Scholar
María Mamérita Mestanza Chávez v. Peru, Case 12.191 (friendly settlement). Report 71/03 (22 October 2003).Google Scholar
Opinión Consultativa [Advisory Opinion], OC-24/17 (24 November 2017).Google Scholar
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Resolution on Involuntary Sterilisation and the Protection of Human Rights in Access to HIV Services. AU Doc. ACHPR/Res.260(LIV)13 (2013).Google Scholar
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Resolution on the Right to Dignity and Freedom from Torture and Ill-treatment of Persons with Psychosocial Disabilities in Africa. AU Doc.ACHPR/Res.343(LVIII)16 (2016).Google Scholar
Commissioner for Human Rights, Recommendation of the Commissioner for Human Rights Concerning Certain Aspects of Law and Practice Relating to Sterilization of Women in the Slovak Republic. CoE Doc. CommDH(2003)12.Google Scholar
Commissioner for Human Rights, Human Rights and Gender Identity. CoE Doc. CommDH/IssuePaper(2009)2.Google Scholar
Commissioner for Human Rights, Report. CoE Doc. CommDH(2011)42.Google Scholar
Commissioner for Human Rights, Report. CoE Doc. CommDH(2012)27.Google Scholar
Committee of Ministers, Recommendation on Measures to Combat Discrimination on Grounds of Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity. CoE Doc. CM/Rec(2010)5.Google Scholar
Committee of Ministers, Supervision of the Execution of Judgments and Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Council of Europe Publications (2018).Google Scholar
CoE, Explanatory Report to the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence. CoE Doc. Explanatory Report CETS 210 (2011).Google Scholar
Council of Europe Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, First Opinion on Norway. CoE Doc. ACFC/INF/OP/I(2003)003 (2003).Google Scholar
CPT, Report to the Czech Government. CoE Doc. CPT/Inf (2007) 32.Google Scholar
CPT, Report to the Czech Government. CoE Doc. CPT/Inf (2009) 8.Google Scholar
European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, Second Report on Norway. CoE Doc. CRI(2000)33.Google Scholar
European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, Third Report on Norway. CoE Doc. CRI(2004)3.Google Scholar
PACE, Condition of Transsexuals. CoE Doc. Rec. 1117 (1989).Google Scholar
PACE, Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. CoE Doc. Res 1728 (2010).Google Scholar
PACE, Putting an End to Coerced Sterilisations and Castrations. CoE Doc. Res 1945 (2013).Google Scholar
PACE, Report: Putting an End to Coerced Sterilisations and Castrations. Written by Liliane Maury Pasquier. CoE Doc. PACE Report 13215 (2013).Google Scholar
PACE, Discrimination against Transgender People in Europe. CoE Doc. Res 2048 (2015).Google Scholar
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, Being Trans in the European Union. Comparative Analysis of EU LGBT Survey Data. FRA Publications (2014).Google Scholar
van den Brink, Marjolein; Dunne, Peter; Burri, Susanne & Timmer, Alexandra, Trans and Intersex Equality Rights in Europe – A Comparative Analysis. European Commission Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers (2018).Google Scholar
International Criminal Court, Elements of Crimes. International Criminal Court Publications (2011).Google Scholar
International Criminal Court, Policy Paper on Sexual and Gender-based Crimes. International Criminal Court Publications (2014).Google Scholar
Andersen, Nina; Groes, Lis; Widemar, Ingrid G; Hækkerup, Grete & Nederström-Lundén, Judit, Medlemsförslag om enhetlig nordisk abortlagstiftning [Member Proposal Regarding a Coherent Nordic Abortion Legislation]. Doc No. A 109/j. Nordic Council Publications (1969).Google Scholar
Nordiska rådet [The Nordic Council], Promemoria angående abortlagstiftningen [Promemoria on the Abortion Legislation]. Unpublished (1969).Google Scholar
CAT Committee, Conclusions and Recommendations on the Czech Republic. UN Doc. CAT/C/CR/32/2 (2004).Google Scholar
CAT Committee, Conclusions and Recommendations on Peru. UN Doc. CAT/C/PER/CO/4 (2006).Google Scholar
CAT Committee, Concluding Observations on Slovakia. UN Doc. CAT/C/SVK/CO/2 (2009).Google Scholar
CAT Committee, Concluding Observations on the Czech Republic. UN Doc. CAT/C/CZE/CO/4-5 (2012).Google Scholar
CAT Committee, General Comment No. 3: Implementation of Article 14 by States Parties. UN Doc. CAT/C/GC/3 (2012).Google Scholar
CAT Committee, Concluding Observations on China with Respect to Hong Kong, China. UN Doc. CAT/C/CHN-HKG/CO/5 (2016).Google Scholar
CAT Committee, Concluding Observations on Czechia. UN Doc. CAT/C/CZE/CO/6 (2018).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, General Recommendation No. 19: Violence against Women. UN Doc. A/47/38 at 1 (1992).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, General Recommendation No. 24: Women and Health. UN Doc. A/54/38 at 5 (1999).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations: Peru. UN Doc. A/57/38, at 454 (2002).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Comments: China. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/CHN/CO/6 (2006).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Comments: The Czech Republic. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/3 (2006).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations: Slovakia. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/SVK/CO/4 (2008).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations: The Czech Republic. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/5 (2010).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations: The Netherlands. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/NLD/CO/5 (2010).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations: Chile. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/CHL/CO/5-6 (2012).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations: Jordan. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/JOR/CO/5 (2012).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations on Colombia. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/COL/CO/7-8 (2013).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations on Belgium. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/BEL/CO/7 (2014).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations on Finland. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/FIN/CO/7 (2014).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations on India. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/IND/CO/4-5 (2014).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations on Peru. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/PER/CO/7-8 (2014).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations on Slovakia. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/SVK/ CO/5-6 (2015).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, General Recommendation No. 35: Gender-based Violence against Women. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/GC/35 (2017).Google Scholar
CERD Committee, Concluding Observations: Peru. UN Doc. CERD/C/304/Add.69 (1999).Google Scholar
CERD Committee, General Recommendation No. 25: Gender-related Dimensions of Racial Discrimination. UN Doc. A/55/18, Annex V, 152 (2000).Google Scholar
CERD Committee, Concluding Observations: Slovakia. UN Doc. A/59/18 (2004).Google Scholar
CERD Committee, Concluding Observations: The Czech Republic. UN Doc. CERD/C/CZE/CO/7 (2007).Google Scholar
CERD Committee, Concluding Observations: Slovakia. UN Doc. CERD/C/SVK/CO/6-8 (2010).Google Scholar
CERD Committee, Concluding Observations: The Czech Republic. UN Doc. CERD/C/CZE/CO/8–9 (2011).Google Scholar
CERD Committee, Concluding Observations on Slovakia. UN Doc. CERD/C/SVK/CO/9–10 (2013).Google Scholar
CESCR Committee, General Comment No. 5: Persons with Disabilities. UN Doc. E/1995/22 at 19 (1995).Google Scholar
CESCR Committee, Concluding Observations: Brazil. UN Doc. E/C.12/1/Add.87 (2003).Google Scholar
CESCR Committee, Concluding Observations: China. UN Doc. E/C.12/1/Add.107 (2005).Google Scholar
CESCR Committee, General Comment No. 22 on the Right to Sexual and Reproductive Health. UN Doc. E/C.12/GC/22 (2016).Google Scholar
CRC Committee, Concluding Observations: Austria. UN Doc. CRC/C/15/Add.98 (1999).Google Scholar
CRC Committee, Concluding Observations: Australia. UN Doc. CRC/C/15/Add.268 (2005).Google Scholar
CRC Committee, General Comment No. 9: The Rights of Children with Disabilities. UN Doc. CRC/C/GC/9 (2007).Google Scholar
CRC Committee, Concluding Observations: Australia. UN Doc. CRC/C/AUS/CO/4 (2012).Google Scholar
CRC Committee, Concluding Observations on China. UN Doc. CRC/C/CHN/CO/3-4 (2013).Google Scholar
CRC Committee, Concluding Observations on India. UN Doc. CRC/C/IND/CO/3-4 (2014).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, Concluding Observations on Hungary. UN Doc. CRPD/C/HUN/CO/1 (2012).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, Concluding Observations on Peru. UN Doc. CRPD/C/PER/CO/1 (2012).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, Concluding Observations on Australia. UN Doc. CRPD/C/AUS/CO/1 (2013).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, General Comment No. 1: Article 12, Equal Recognition before the Law. UN Doc. CRPD/C/GC/1 (2014).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, Concluding Observations on the Republic of Korea. UN Doc. CRPD/C/KOR/CO/1 (2014).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, Concluding Observations on Germany. UN Doc. CRPD/C/DEU/CO/1 (2015).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, Concluding Observations on Lithuania. UN Doc. CRPD/C/LTU/CO/1 (2015).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, Concluding Observations on the Czech Republic. UN Doc. CRPD/C/CZE/CO/1 (2015).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, General Comment No. 3: Women and Girls with Disabilities. UN Doc. CRPD/C/GC/3 (2016).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, General Comment No. 5: Living Independently and Being Included in the Community. UN Doc. CRPD/C/GC/5 (2017).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, Concluding Observations on South Africa. UN Doc. CRPD/C/ZAF/CO/1 (2018).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, General Comment No. 6: Equality and Non-discrimination. UN Doc. CRPD/C/GC/6 (2018).Google Scholar
ECOSOC, 21st Session: Summary Records of the Commission on the Status of Women. UN Doc. E/CN.6/SR.519 (1968).Google Scholar
ECOSOC, Violence against Women (Addendum): Policies and Practices that Impact Women’s Reproductive Rights and Contribute To, Cause or Constitute Violence against Women, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women, Its Causes and Consequences, Radhika Coomaraswamy. UN Doc. E/CN.4/1999/68/Add.4 (1999).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations: Japan. UN Doc. CCPR/C/79/Add.102 (1998).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations: Peru. UN Doc. CCPR/CO/70/PER (2000).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 28: Equality of Rights between Men and Women (Article 3). UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.10 (2000).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations: Slovakia. UN Doc. CCPR/CO/78/SVK (2003).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations: The Czech Republic. UN Doc. CCPR/C/CZE/CO/2 (2007).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations: Switzerland. UN Doc. CCPR/C/CHE/CO/3 (2009).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations: Slovakia. UN Doc. CCPR/C/SVK/CO/3 (2011).Google Scholar
OHCHR et al, Eliminating Forced, Coercive and Otherwise Involuntary Sterilization: An Interagency Statement. World Health Organization Publications (2014).Google Scholar
UN, Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, Fourth World Conference on Women. United Nations Publications (1995).Google Scholar
UN, Durban Declaration and Programme of Action. United Nations Publications (2002).Google Scholar
UNGA, Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women. UN Doc. A/RES/48/104 (1993).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Committee on Elimination of Discrimination against Women. UN Doc. A/49/38 (1994).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Committee on Elimination of Discrimination against Women. UN Doc. A/54/38 (1999).Google Scholar
UNGA, Economic, Cultural and Social Rights. The Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health: Report of the Special Rapporteur, Paul Hunt. UN Doc. E/CN.4/2004/49 (2004).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the Right of Everyone to the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental health, Paul Hunt. Addendum. UN Doc. E/CN.4/2005/51/Add.3 (2005).Google Scholar
UNGA, Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law. UN Doc. A/RES/60/147 (2006).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health, Paul Hunt. Addendum. UN Doc. A/HRC/4/28/Add.1 (2008).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Manfred Nowak. UN Doc. A/HRC/7/3 (2008).Google Scholar
UNGA, Promotion and Protection of All Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Including the Right to Development. Report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women, its Causes and Consequences, Rashida Manjoo. UN Doc. A/HRC/14/22 (2010).Google Scholar
UNGA, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. UN Doc. A/RES/65/19 (2010).Google Scholar
UNGA, Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health. Report by the Special Rapporteur on the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health. UN Doc. A/66/254 (2011).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, Githu Muigai. UN Doc. A/HRC/17/49 (2011).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Finland. UN Doc. A/HRC/21/8 (2012).Google Scholar
UNGA, Thematic Study on the Issue of Violence against Women and Girls and Disability. Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. UN Doc. A/HRC/20/5 (2012).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Juan E. Méndez. UN Doc. A/HRC/22/53 (2013).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights, Magdalena Sepúlveda Carmona. Addendum. UN Doc. A/HRC/26/28/Add.2 (2014).Google Scholar
UNGA, Discrimination and Violence against Individuals based on their Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. UN Doc. A/HRC/29/23 (2015).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues, Rita Izsák. Comprehensive Study of the Human Rights Situation of Roma Worldwide, with a Particular Focus on the Phenomenon of Anti-Gypsyism. UN Doc. A/HRC/29/24 (2015).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of Non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff. UN Doc. A/HRC/30/42 (2015).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. UN Doc. A/HRC/31/57 (2016).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Independent Expert on Protection against Violence and Discrimination based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. UN Doc. A/HRC/35/36 (2017).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Finland. UN Doc. A/HRC/36/8 (2017).Google Scholar
UN Secretariat, First Draft of the Genocide Convention. UN Doc. E/447 (1947).Google Scholar
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Resolution on Involuntary Sterilisation and the Protection of Human Rights in Access to HIV Services. AU Doc. ACHPR/Res.260(LIV)13 (2013).Google Scholar
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Resolution on the Right to Dignity and Freedom from Torture and Ill-treatment of Persons with Psychosocial Disabilities in Africa. AU Doc.ACHPR/Res.343(LVIII)16 (2016).Google Scholar
Commissioner for Human Rights, Recommendation of the Commissioner for Human Rights Concerning Certain Aspects of Law and Practice Relating to Sterilization of Women in the Slovak Republic. CoE Doc. CommDH(2003)12.Google Scholar
Commissioner for Human Rights, Human Rights and Gender Identity. CoE Doc. CommDH/IssuePaper(2009)2.Google Scholar
Commissioner for Human Rights, Report. CoE Doc. CommDH(2011)42.Google Scholar
Commissioner for Human Rights, Report. CoE Doc. CommDH(2012)27.Google Scholar
Committee of Ministers, Recommendation on Measures to Combat Discrimination on Grounds of Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity. CoE Doc. CM/Rec(2010)5.Google Scholar
Committee of Ministers, Supervision of the Execution of Judgments and Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Council of Europe Publications (2018).Google Scholar
CoE, Explanatory Report to the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence. CoE Doc. Explanatory Report CETS 210 (2011).Google Scholar
Council of Europe Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, First Opinion on Norway. CoE Doc. ACFC/INF/OP/I(2003)003 (2003).Google Scholar
CPT, Report to the Czech Government. CoE Doc. CPT/Inf (2007) 32.Google Scholar
CPT, Report to the Czech Government. CoE Doc. CPT/Inf (2009) 8.Google Scholar
European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, Second Report on Norway. CoE Doc. CRI(2000)33.Google Scholar
European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, Third Report on Norway. CoE Doc. CRI(2004)3.Google Scholar
PACE, Condition of Transsexuals. CoE Doc. Rec. 1117 (1989).Google Scholar
PACE, Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. CoE Doc. Res 1728 (2010).Google Scholar
PACE, Putting an End to Coerced Sterilisations and Castrations. CoE Doc. Res 1945 (2013).Google Scholar
PACE, Report: Putting an End to Coerced Sterilisations and Castrations. Written by Liliane Maury Pasquier. CoE Doc. PACE Report 13215 (2013).Google Scholar
PACE, Discrimination against Transgender People in Europe. CoE Doc. Res 2048 (2015).Google Scholar
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, Being Trans in the European Union. Comparative Analysis of EU LGBT Survey Data. FRA Publications (2014).Google Scholar
van den Brink, Marjolein; Dunne, Peter; Burri, Susanne & Timmer, Alexandra, Trans and Intersex Equality Rights in Europe – A Comparative Analysis. European Commission Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers (2018).Google Scholar
International Criminal Court, Elements of Crimes. International Criminal Court Publications (2011).Google Scholar
International Criminal Court, Policy Paper on Sexual and Gender-based Crimes. International Criminal Court Publications (2014).Google Scholar
Andersen, Nina; Groes, Lis; Widemar, Ingrid G; Hækkerup, Grete & Nederström-Lundén, Judit, Medlemsförslag om enhetlig nordisk abortlagstiftning [Member Proposal Regarding a Coherent Nordic Abortion Legislation]. Doc No. A 109/j. Nordic Council Publications (1969).Google Scholar
Nordiska rådet [The Nordic Council], Promemoria angående abortlagstiftningen [Promemoria on the Abortion Legislation]. Unpublished (1969).Google Scholar
CAT Committee, Conclusions and Recommendations on the Czech Republic. UN Doc. CAT/C/CR/32/2 (2004).Google Scholar
CAT Committee, Conclusions and Recommendations on Peru. UN Doc. CAT/C/PER/CO/4 (2006).Google Scholar
CAT Committee, Concluding Observations on Slovakia. UN Doc. CAT/C/SVK/CO/2 (2009).Google Scholar
CAT Committee, Concluding Observations on the Czech Republic. UN Doc. CAT/C/CZE/CO/4-5 (2012).Google Scholar
CAT Committee, General Comment No. 3: Implementation of Article 14 by States Parties. UN Doc. CAT/C/GC/3 (2012).Google Scholar
CAT Committee, Concluding Observations on China with Respect to Hong Kong, China. UN Doc. CAT/C/CHN-HKG/CO/5 (2016).Google Scholar
CAT Committee, Concluding Observations on Czechia. UN Doc. CAT/C/CZE/CO/6 (2018).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, General Recommendation No. 19: Violence against Women. UN Doc. A/47/38 at 1 (1992).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, General Recommendation No. 24: Women and Health. UN Doc. A/54/38 at 5 (1999).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations: Peru. UN Doc. A/57/38, at 454 (2002).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Comments: China. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/CHN/CO/6 (2006).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Comments: The Czech Republic. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/3 (2006).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations: Slovakia. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/SVK/CO/4 (2008).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations: The Czech Republic. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/5 (2010).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations: The Netherlands. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/NLD/CO/5 (2010).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations: Chile. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/CHL/CO/5-6 (2012).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations: Jordan. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/JOR/CO/5 (2012).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations on Colombia. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/COL/CO/7-8 (2013).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations on Belgium. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/BEL/CO/7 (2014).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations on Finland. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/FIN/CO/7 (2014).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations on India. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/IND/CO/4-5 (2014).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations on Peru. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/PER/CO/7-8 (2014).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, Concluding Observations on Slovakia. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/SVK/ CO/5-6 (2015).Google Scholar
CEDAW Committee, General Recommendation No. 35: Gender-based Violence against Women. UN Doc. CEDAW/C/GC/35 (2017).Google Scholar
CERD Committee, Concluding Observations: Peru. UN Doc. CERD/C/304/Add.69 (1999).Google Scholar
CERD Committee, General Recommendation No. 25: Gender-related Dimensions of Racial Discrimination. UN Doc. A/55/18, Annex V, 152 (2000).Google Scholar
CERD Committee, Concluding Observations: Slovakia. UN Doc. A/59/18 (2004).Google Scholar
CERD Committee, Concluding Observations: The Czech Republic. UN Doc. CERD/C/CZE/CO/7 (2007).Google Scholar
CERD Committee, Concluding Observations: Slovakia. UN Doc. CERD/C/SVK/CO/6-8 (2010).Google Scholar
CERD Committee, Concluding Observations: The Czech Republic. UN Doc. CERD/C/CZE/CO/8–9 (2011).Google Scholar
CERD Committee, Concluding Observations on Slovakia. UN Doc. CERD/C/SVK/CO/9–10 (2013).Google Scholar
CESCR Committee, General Comment No. 5: Persons with Disabilities. UN Doc. E/1995/22 at 19 (1995).Google Scholar
CESCR Committee, Concluding Observations: Brazil. UN Doc. E/C.12/1/Add.87 (2003).Google Scholar
CESCR Committee, Concluding Observations: China. UN Doc. E/C.12/1/Add.107 (2005).Google Scholar
CESCR Committee, General Comment No. 22 on the Right to Sexual and Reproductive Health. UN Doc. E/C.12/GC/22 (2016).Google Scholar
CRC Committee, Concluding Observations: Austria. UN Doc. CRC/C/15/Add.98 (1999).Google Scholar
CRC Committee, Concluding Observations: Australia. UN Doc. CRC/C/15/Add.268 (2005).Google Scholar
CRC Committee, General Comment No. 9: The Rights of Children with Disabilities. UN Doc. CRC/C/GC/9 (2007).Google Scholar
CRC Committee, Concluding Observations: Australia. UN Doc. CRC/C/AUS/CO/4 (2012).Google Scholar
CRC Committee, Concluding Observations on China. UN Doc. CRC/C/CHN/CO/3-4 (2013).Google Scholar
CRC Committee, Concluding Observations on India. UN Doc. CRC/C/IND/CO/3-4 (2014).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, Concluding Observations on Hungary. UN Doc. CRPD/C/HUN/CO/1 (2012).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, Concluding Observations on Peru. UN Doc. CRPD/C/PER/CO/1 (2012).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, Concluding Observations on Australia. UN Doc. CRPD/C/AUS/CO/1 (2013).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, General Comment No. 1: Article 12, Equal Recognition before the Law. UN Doc. CRPD/C/GC/1 (2014).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, Concluding Observations on the Republic of Korea. UN Doc. CRPD/C/KOR/CO/1 (2014).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, Concluding Observations on Germany. UN Doc. CRPD/C/DEU/CO/1 (2015).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, Concluding Observations on Lithuania. UN Doc. CRPD/C/LTU/CO/1 (2015).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, Concluding Observations on the Czech Republic. UN Doc. CRPD/C/CZE/CO/1 (2015).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, General Comment No. 3: Women and Girls with Disabilities. UN Doc. CRPD/C/GC/3 (2016).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, General Comment No. 5: Living Independently and Being Included in the Community. UN Doc. CRPD/C/GC/5 (2017).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, Concluding Observations on South Africa. UN Doc. CRPD/C/ZAF/CO/1 (2018).Google Scholar
CRPD Committee, General Comment No. 6: Equality and Non-discrimination. UN Doc. CRPD/C/GC/6 (2018).Google Scholar
ECOSOC, 21st Session: Summary Records of the Commission on the Status of Women. UN Doc. E/CN.6/SR.519 (1968).Google Scholar
ECOSOC, Violence against Women (Addendum): Policies and Practices that Impact Women’s Reproductive Rights and Contribute To, Cause or Constitute Violence against Women, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women, Its Causes and Consequences, Radhika Coomaraswamy. UN Doc. E/CN.4/1999/68/Add.4 (1999).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations: Japan. UN Doc. CCPR/C/79/Add.102 (1998).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations: Peru. UN Doc. CCPR/CO/70/PER (2000).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 28: Equality of Rights between Men and Women (Article 3). UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.10 (2000).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations: Slovakia. UN Doc. CCPR/CO/78/SVK (2003).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations: The Czech Republic. UN Doc. CCPR/C/CZE/CO/2 (2007).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations: Switzerland. UN Doc. CCPR/C/CHE/CO/3 (2009).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations: Slovakia. UN Doc. CCPR/C/SVK/CO/3 (2011).Google Scholar
OHCHR et al, Eliminating Forced, Coercive and Otherwise Involuntary Sterilization: An Interagency Statement. World Health Organization Publications (2014).Google Scholar
UN, Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, Fourth World Conference on Women. United Nations Publications (1995).Google Scholar
UN, Durban Declaration and Programme of Action. United Nations Publications (2002).Google Scholar
UNGA, Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women. UN Doc. A/RES/48/104 (1993).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Committee on Elimination of Discrimination against Women. UN Doc. A/49/38 (1994).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Committee on Elimination of Discrimination against Women. UN Doc. A/54/38 (1999).Google Scholar
UNGA, Economic, Cultural and Social Rights. The Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health: Report of the Special Rapporteur, Paul Hunt. UN Doc. E/CN.4/2004/49 (2004).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the Right of Everyone to the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental health, Paul Hunt. Addendum. UN Doc. E/CN.4/2005/51/Add.3 (2005).Google Scholar
UNGA, Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law. UN Doc. A/RES/60/147 (2006).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health, Paul Hunt. Addendum. UN Doc. A/HRC/4/28/Add.1 (2008).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Manfred Nowak. UN Doc. A/HRC/7/3 (2008).Google Scholar
UNGA, Promotion and Protection of All Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Including the Right to Development. Report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women, its Causes and Consequences, Rashida Manjoo. UN Doc. A/HRC/14/22 (2010).Google Scholar
UNGA, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. UN Doc. A/RES/65/19 (2010).Google Scholar
UNGA, Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health. Report by the Special Rapporteur on the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health. UN Doc. A/66/254 (2011).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, Githu Muigai. UN Doc. A/HRC/17/49 (2011).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Finland. UN Doc. A/HRC/21/8 (2012).Google Scholar
UNGA, Thematic Study on the Issue of Violence against Women and Girls and Disability. Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. UN Doc. A/HRC/20/5 (2012).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Juan E. Méndez. UN Doc. A/HRC/22/53 (2013).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights, Magdalena Sepúlveda Carmona. Addendum. UN Doc. A/HRC/26/28/Add.2 (2014).Google Scholar
UNGA, Discrimination and Violence against Individuals based on their Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. UN Doc. A/HRC/29/23 (2015).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues, Rita Izsák. Comprehensive Study of the Human Rights Situation of Roma Worldwide, with a Particular Focus on the Phenomenon of Anti-Gypsyism. UN Doc. A/HRC/29/24 (2015).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of Non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff. UN Doc. A/HRC/30/42 (2015).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. UN Doc. A/HRC/31/57 (2016).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Independent Expert on Protection against Violence and Discrimination based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. UN Doc. A/HRC/35/36 (2017).Google Scholar
UNGA, Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Finland. UN Doc. A/HRC/36/8 (2017).Google Scholar
UN Secretariat, First Draft of the Genocide Convention. UN Doc. E/447 (1947).Google Scholar
Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, Muir v. Alberta. 132 D.L.R. (4th) 695 Court File No. 8903 (25 January 1996).Google Scholar
Eduskunnan apulaisoikeusasiamies [Finnish Deputy Parliamentary Ombudsman], Päätös [Decision]. Doc. No. EOAK/2842/2017 (24 October 2018).Google Scholar
Eduskunnan oikeusasiamies [The Finnish Parliamentary Ombudsman], Päätös kanteluun [Decision on Complaint]. Doc. No. 2882/4/07 (23 March 2009).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 4111/65/70 (6 September 1971).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 2769/65/71 (9 May 1972).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 3576/65/76 (31 August 1974).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 4919/65/72 (13 September 1974).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 5/65/76 (5 April 1977).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 3267/65/76 (5 April 1977).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 4915/65/76 (31 August 1977).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 1111/65/78 (29 January 1979).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 1307/65/78 (29 January 1979).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 2299/65/78 (8 January 1980).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 3962/65/78 (8 January 1980).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 4914/65/78 (8 January 1980).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 5689/65/83 (19 April 1984).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 1449/2/87, KHO:1988-A-46 (9 March 1988).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 1433/1/08, KHO:2009:15 (3 February 2009).Google Scholar
Korkein oikeus (KO) [The Finnish Supreme Court], KKO:2008:10 (8 February 2008).Google Scholar
Potilasvakuutuskeskus [Patient Insurance Centre], PO 2003–6434–83 (2003).Google Scholar
Bundesverfassungsgericht [German Federal Constitutional Court], 1 BvR 3295/07, Rn. (1-82) (11 January 2011).Google Scholar
Supreme Court of Namibia, Government of the Republic of Namibia v. L.M. and Others (SA 49/2012). NASC 19 (3 November 2014).Google Scholar
Borgarting lagmannsrett [Borgarting Court of Appeal], Case No. LB-2018-154220 (15 April 2020).Google Scholar
Borgarting lagmannsrett [Borgarting Court of Appeal], Case No. 18-190131ASD-BORG/02 (16 March 2021).Google Scholar
Eidsivating Lagmannsrett [Eidsivating Court of Appeal], Appeal No. 43/1954 (1956).Google Scholar
Frostating Lagmannsrett [Frostating Court of Appeal], Appeal No. 97/1949 (1950).Google Scholar
Høyesterett [The Norwegian Supreme Court], Rt. 1976 s. 1 (Kløfta).Google Scholar
Høyesterett [The Norwegian Supreme Court], Rt. 1994 s. 610 (Bølgepappkjennelsen).Google Scholar
Høyesterett [The Norwegian Supreme Court], Rt. 2000 s. 996 (Bøhlerdommen).Google Scholar
Høyesterett [The Norwegian Supreme Court], Rt. 2013 s. 588 (Besøksforbud).Google Scholar
Høyesteretts ankeutvalg [The Appeals Committee of the Norwegian Supreme Court], Case No. HR-2020-1486-U (16 July 2020).Google Scholar
Høyesteretts ankeutvalg [The Appeals Committee of the Norwegian Supreme Court], Case No. HR-2021-1392-U (29 June 2021).Google Scholar
Likestillings- og diskrimineringsombudet [The Norwegian Equality and Anti-discrimination Ombud], Decision No. 12/650 (28 January 2013).Google Scholar
Likestillings- og diskrimineringsombudet [The Norwegian Equality and Anti-discrimination Ombud], Decision No. 14/840 (23 September 2014).Google Scholar
Oslo tingrett [Oslo Court of First Instance], Case No. 17-146470 TVI-OTIR/04 (16 Augusti 2018).Google Scholar
Oslo tingrett [Oslo Court of First Instance], Case No. 17-132417TVI-OTIR/08 (18 October 2018).Google Scholar
Tana og Varanger herredsrett [Tana and Varanger Court of First Instance], Case No. 36/1985 A (8 October 1985).Google Scholar
Förvaltningsrätten i Stockholm [Stockholm Administrative Court of First Instance], Judgment No. 45723-10 (9 March 2012).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 1964, s. 471 (1964).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2003, s. 217 (6 June 2003).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2005, s. 462 (9 June 2005).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2007, s. 584 (21 September 2007).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2012, s. 211 (11 April 2012).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2012, s. 400 (15 June 2012).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2013, s. 350 (16 May 2013).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2013, s. 746 (16 July 2013).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2014, s. 323 (23 April 2014).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2014, s. 332 (23 April 2014).Google Scholar
JK [The Chancellor of Justice], Skadeståndsanspråk mot staten med anledning av sterilisering enligt könstillhörighetslagen [Compensation Claim against the State Due to Sterilisation according to the Gender Recognition Act]. Decision No. 4243-13-40 et al (17 June 2014).Google Scholar
Kammarrätten i Stockholm [Stockholm Administrative Court of Appeal], Judgment No. 3413-04 (30 March 2005).Google Scholar
Kammarrätten i Stockholm [Stockholm Administrative Court of Appeal], Judgment No. 1968-12 (19 December 2012).Google Scholar
Regeringsrätten [The Swedish Supreme Administrative Court], Judgment no. 2751-05 (13 March 2008).Google Scholar
Supreme Court of the United States, Marbury v. Madison. 5 U.S. 137 (24 February 1803).Google Scholar
Supreme Court of the United States, Buck v. Bell. 274 U.S. 200 (2 May 1927).Google Scholar
Supreme Court of the United States, Skinner v. Oklahoma. 316 U.S. 535 (1 June 1942).Google Scholar
Supreme Court of the United States, Griswold v. Connecticut. 381 U.S. 479 (7 June 1965).Google Scholar
Supreme Court of the United States, Roe v. Wade. 410 U.S. 113 (22 January 1973).Google Scholar
Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, Muir v. Alberta. 132 D.L.R. (4th) 695 Court File No. 8903 (25 January 1996).Google Scholar
Eduskunnan apulaisoikeusasiamies [Finnish Deputy Parliamentary Ombudsman], Päätös [Decision]. Doc. No. EOAK/2842/2017 (24 October 2018).Google Scholar
Eduskunnan oikeusasiamies [The Finnish Parliamentary Ombudsman], Päätös kanteluun [Decision on Complaint]. Doc. No. 2882/4/07 (23 March 2009).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 4111/65/70 (6 September 1971).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 2769/65/71 (9 May 1972).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 3576/65/76 (31 August 1974).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 4919/65/72 (13 September 1974).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 5/65/76 (5 April 1977).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 3267/65/76 (5 April 1977).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 4915/65/76 (31 August 1977).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 1111/65/78 (29 January 1979).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 1307/65/78 (29 January 1979).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 2299/65/78 (8 January 1980).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 3962/65/78 (8 January 1980).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 4914/65/78 (8 January 1980).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 5689/65/83 (19 April 1984).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 1449/2/87, KHO:1988-A-46 (9 March 1988).Google Scholar
Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO) [The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court], Doc. No. 1433/1/08, KHO:2009:15 (3 February 2009).Google Scholar
Korkein oikeus (KO) [The Finnish Supreme Court], KKO:2008:10 (8 February 2008).Google Scholar
Potilasvakuutuskeskus [Patient Insurance Centre], PO 2003–6434–83 (2003).Google Scholar
Bundesverfassungsgericht [German Federal Constitutional Court], 1 BvR 3295/07, Rn. (1-82) (11 January 2011).Google Scholar
Supreme Court of Namibia, Government of the Republic of Namibia v. L.M. and Others (SA 49/2012). NASC 19 (3 November 2014).Google Scholar
Borgarting lagmannsrett [Borgarting Court of Appeal], Case No. LB-2018-154220 (15 April 2020).Google Scholar
Borgarting lagmannsrett [Borgarting Court of Appeal], Case No. 18-190131ASD-BORG/02 (16 March 2021).Google Scholar
Eidsivating Lagmannsrett [Eidsivating Court of Appeal], Appeal No. 43/1954 (1956).Google Scholar
Frostating Lagmannsrett [Frostating Court of Appeal], Appeal No. 97/1949 (1950).Google Scholar
Høyesterett [The Norwegian Supreme Court], Rt. 1976 s. 1 (Kløfta).Google Scholar
Høyesterett [The Norwegian Supreme Court], Rt. 1994 s. 610 (Bølgepappkjennelsen).Google Scholar
Høyesterett [The Norwegian Supreme Court], Rt. 2000 s. 996 (Bøhlerdommen).Google Scholar
Høyesterett [The Norwegian Supreme Court], Rt. 2013 s. 588 (Besøksforbud).Google Scholar
Høyesteretts ankeutvalg [The Appeals Committee of the Norwegian Supreme Court], Case No. HR-2020-1486-U (16 July 2020).Google Scholar
Høyesteretts ankeutvalg [The Appeals Committee of the Norwegian Supreme Court], Case No. HR-2021-1392-U (29 June 2021).Google Scholar
Likestillings- og diskrimineringsombudet [The Norwegian Equality and Anti-discrimination Ombud], Decision No. 12/650 (28 January 2013).Google Scholar
Likestillings- og diskrimineringsombudet [The Norwegian Equality and Anti-discrimination Ombud], Decision No. 14/840 (23 September 2014).Google Scholar
Oslo tingrett [Oslo Court of First Instance], Case No. 17-146470 TVI-OTIR/04 (16 Augusti 2018).Google Scholar
Oslo tingrett [Oslo Court of First Instance], Case No. 17-132417TVI-OTIR/08 (18 October 2018).Google Scholar
Tana og Varanger herredsrett [Tana and Varanger Court of First Instance], Case No. 36/1985 A (8 October 1985).Google Scholar
Förvaltningsrätten i Stockholm [Stockholm Administrative Court of First Instance], Judgment No. 45723-10 (9 March 2012).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 1964, s. 471 (1964).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2003, s. 217 (6 June 2003).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2005, s. 462 (9 June 2005).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2007, s. 584 (21 September 2007).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2012, s. 211 (11 April 2012).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2012, s. 400 (15 June 2012).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2013, s. 350 (16 May 2013).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2013, s. 746 (16 July 2013).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2014, s. 323 (23 April 2014).Google Scholar
Högsta Domstolen (HD) [The Swedish Supreme Court], NJA 2014, s. 332 (23 April 2014).Google Scholar
JK [The Chancellor of Justice], Skadeståndsanspråk mot staten med anledning av sterilisering enligt könstillhörighetslagen [Compensation Claim against the State Due to Sterilisation according to the Gender Recognition Act]. Decision No. 4243-13-40 et al (17 June 2014).Google Scholar
Kammarrätten i Stockholm [Stockholm Administrative Court of Appeal], Judgment No. 3413-04 (30 March 2005).Google Scholar
Kammarrätten i Stockholm [Stockholm Administrative Court of Appeal], Judgment No. 1968-12 (19 December 2012).Google Scholar
Regeringsrätten [The Swedish Supreme Administrative Court], Judgment no. 2751-05 (13 March 2008).Google Scholar
Supreme Court of the United States, Marbury v. Madison. 5 U.S. 137 (24 February 1803).Google Scholar
Supreme Court of the United States, Buck v. Bell. 274 U.S. 200 (2 May 1927).Google Scholar
Supreme Court of the United States, Skinner v. Oklahoma. 316 U.S. 535 (1 June 1942).Google Scholar
Supreme Court of the United States, Griswold v. Connecticut. 381 U.S. 479 (7 June 1965).Google Scholar
Supreme Court of the United States, Roe v. Wade. 410 U.S. 113 (22 January 1973).Google Scholar
Aborttikomitea [The Finnish Abortion Committee], Mietintö [Report]. KM 1968:A11 (1969).Google Scholar
Citizens’ Initiative KAA 6/2021, Oikeus olla – kansalaisaloite oikeudenmukaisemman translain puolesta [The Right to Exist – A Citizens’ Initiative for a Fairer Trans Act].Google Scholar
Eduskunnan apulaisoikeusasiamies [Finnish Deputy Parliamentary Ombudsman], Kysymys sisäasiainministeriölle [Question for the Finnish Ministry of the Interior]. Doc. No. 2486/2/98 (4 December 1998).Google Scholar
Eduskunnan oikeusasiamies [The Finnish Parliamentary Ombudsman], Letter No. 1367. Doc. No. 683/2/91 (24 April 1991).Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 112/1934, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle sterilisoimislaiksi [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding a Sterilisation Act].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 58/1948, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle kastroimislaiksi [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding a Castration Act].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 59/1948, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle sterilisoimislaiksi [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding aSterilisation Act].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 60/1948, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle laiksi raskaudentilan keskeyttämisestä sekä laiksi rikoslain muuttamisesta [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding an Act on Termination of Pregnancy and an Amendment of the Criminal Code].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 104/1969, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle laiksi raskaudentilan keskeyttämisestä sekä laiksi rikoslain muuttamisesta [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding an Act on Termination of Pregnancy and an Amendment of the Criminal Code].Google Scholar
Finnish Government, Bill HE 105/1969, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle steriloimislaiksi [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding a Sterilisation Act].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 106/1969, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle kastroimislaiksi [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding a Castration Act].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 187/1973, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle Vahingonkorvausta koskevaksi lainsäädännöksi [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding a Liability Act].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 309/1993, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle perustuslakien perusoikeussäännösten muuttamisesta [Government Bill to the Parliament on the Revision of Constitutional Rights].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 1/1998, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle uudeksi Suomen Hallitusmuodoksi [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding a New Finnish Government Act].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 200/2000, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle laiksi virallistetusta parisuhteesta [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding an Act on Registered Partnership].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 207/2000, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle laeiksi raskauden keskeyttämisestä annetun lain ja steriloimislain muuttamisesta [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding the Amendment of the Act on Termination of Pregnancy and the Sterilisation Act].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 56/2001, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle laiksi sukupuolen vahvistamisesta eräissä tapauksissa ja eräiksi siihen liittyviksi laeiksi [Government Bill to the Parliament, Act on Legal Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances and Connected Acts].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 19/2014, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle yhdenvertaisuuslaiksi ja eräiksi siihen liittyviksi laeiksi [Government Bill to the Parliament, Non-Discrimination Act and Related Legislation].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 159/2014, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle laiksi valtion vahingonkorvaustoiminnasta sekä eräiksi siihen liittyviksi laeiksi [Government Bill to the Parliament for an Act on Administration of State Liability and Some Connected Acts].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 189/2022, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle laiksi sukupuolen vahvistamisesta ja siihen liittyviksi laeiksi [Government Bill regarding an Act on Gender Recognition and Connected Legislation].Google Scholar
Finnish Parliamentary Bill LA 43/2016, Lakialoite laiksi transseksuaalin sukupuolen vahvistamisesta annetun lain 1 §:n muuttamisesta [Bill to Amend Section 1 of the Act on Gender Recognition of Transsexuals].Google Scholar
Ihmisoikeusvaltuuskunta [The Finnish Human Rights Delegation], Suomi rikkoo Euroopan ihmisoikeussopimusta – Ihmisoikeusvaltuuskunta vaatii translain kiirellistä uudistamista [Finland Violates the European Convention on Human Rights – The Finnish Human Rights Delegation Demands an Immediate Change of the Trans Act] (2017).Google Scholar
Komitea, joka on asetettu harkitsemaan tylsämielisten y.m. sterilisoimista koskevaa kysymystä [The Finnish Committee appointed to Consider the Question of Sterilisation of the Feebleminded etc.], Mietintö [Report]. KM 1929:5 (1929).Google Scholar
Lääkintöhallitus [The Finnish Board of Health], Päätös [Decision]. Doc. No. 11083/38/71 (1971).Google Scholar
Lääkintöhallitus [The Finnish Board of Health], Ohjekirje [Guidelines]. Doc. No. 3905/02/79 (1979).Google Scholar
Lainvalmistelukunta [The Finnish Preparatory Legislative Committee], Ehdotus hallituksen esitykseksi eduskunnalle sterilisoimislaiksi [Proposal for Government Bill to Parliament, Sterilisation Act]. LVM 1947:3 (1947).Google Scholar
Lakivaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Legal Affairs Committee], Lausunto [Statement]. LaVL 4/1948 (1948)Google Scholar
Oikeusministeriö [The Finnish Ministry of Justice], Seksuaali- ja sukupuolivähemmistöön kuuluvien perus- ja ihmisoikeudet Suomessa [Constitutional and Human Rights for Sexual and Gender Minorities in Finland]. OM 34/2014 (2014).Google Scholar
Perustuslakivaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Constitutional Law Committee], Mietintö [Report]. PeVM 25/94 (1994).Google Scholar
Perustuslakivaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Constitutional Law Committee], Mietintö [Report]. PeVM 3/95 (1995).Google Scholar
Perustuslakivaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Constitutional Law Committee], Mietintö [Report]. PeVM 10/1998 (1998).Google Scholar
Perustuslakivaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Constitutional Law Committee], Mietintö [Report]. PeVM 1/1999 (1999).Google Scholar
Prime Minister Antti Rinne’s Government, Inclusive and Competent Finland – A Socially, Economically and Ecologically Sustainable Society (6 June 2019).Google Scholar
Prime Minister Sanna Marin’s Government, Inclusive and Competent Finland – A Socially, Economically and Ecologically Sustainable Society (10 December 2019).Google Scholar
Sisäasiainministerö [The Finnish Ministry of the Interior], Lausunto [Statement]. Doc. No. 37/032/98 (1 March 1999).Google Scholar
Suuri valiokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Grand Committee], Mietintö [Report]. SuVM 95/1949 (1949).Google Scholar
Suuri valiokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Grand Committee], Mietintö [Report]. SuVM 96/1949 (1949).Google Scholar
Suuri valiokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Grand Committee], Mietintö [Report]. SuVM 97/1949 (1949).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö [The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health], Työryhmän asettaminen [Appointment of Working Group]. Doc. No. 6984/04/87 (1987).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö [The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health], Lakiesitys sukupuoleen kuulumisen vahvistamisesta eräissä tapauksissa [Legislation Draft on Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances]. Doc. No. STM/268/011/1991 (1991).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö [The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health], Transseksuaalien aseman kehittämistyöryhmän muistio [Memorandum of the Working Group on the Position of Transsexuals]. STM 2000:2 (2000).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö [The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health], Sukupuolen oikeudellisen vahvistamisen edellytykset [The Preconditions for Legal Gender Recognition]. STM 2015:23 (2015).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö [The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health], Lastensuojelun sijaishuollon epäkohdat ja lasten kaltoinkohtelu 1937–1983 [Shortcomings in Substitute Care of the Child Protection Services and Maltreatment of Children 1937–1983]. STM 2016:22 (2016a).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö [The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health], Official Apology to Everyone Who Suffered Maltreatment in Foster Care in the Past Decades, stm.fi/sv/-/lastensuojelun-sijaishuollossa-kaltoin-kohdelluilta-pyydettiin-anteeksi?languageId=en_US (20 November 2016b).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö [The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health], Vaihtoehtoiset sääntelymallit sukupuolivähemmistöjen oikeudellisen aseman järjestämiseksi: Translainsäädännön uudistamisen valmistelutyöryhmä [Alternative Regulatory Models to Organise the Legal Position of Gender Minorities: The Working Group to Revise the Trans Act] (2020).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Social Affairs and Health Committee], Protocol No. 4/2002 (2002a).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Social Affairs and Health Committee], Protocol No. 6/2002 (2002b).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Social Affairs and Health Committee], Protocol No. 10/2002 (2002c).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Social Affairs and Health Committee], Mietintö [Report]. StVM 7/2002 (2002).Google Scholar
Stakes [The Finnish Centre for Research and Development on Health and Welfare], Transseksuaalien hoito- ja tukipalvelujen kehittämistyöryhmän muistio [Report of the Working Group on the Development of Health Care and Support Services for Transsexuals]. Stakes Report No. 18/1994 (1994).Google Scholar
Talousvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Commerce Committee], Mietintö [Report]. TaVM 3/1949 (1949).Google Scholar
Talousvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Commerce Committee], Mietintö [Report]. TaVM 4/1949 (1949).Google Scholar
Talousvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Commerce Committee], Mietintö [Report]. TaVM 5/1949 (1949).Google Scholar
Talousvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Commerce Committee], Mietintö [Report]. TaVM 16/1970 (1970).Google Scholar
Talousvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Commerce Committee], Mietintö [Report]. TaVM 17/1970 (1970).Google Scholar
Tasa-arvovaltuutettu [The Finnish Ombudsman for Equality], Lisääntymiskyvyttömyysvaatimus rikkoo transsukupuolisten ihmisoikeuksia [The Infertility Requirement Violates Transgender People’s Human Rights], www.tasa-arvo.fi/-/tasa-arvovaltuutettu-lisaantymiskyvyttomyysvaatimus-rikkoo-transsukupuolisten-ihmisoikeuksia (21 November 2011).Google Scholar
Tasa-arvovaltuutettu [The Finnish Ombudsman for Equality], Selvitys sukupuolivähemmistöjen asemasta [Investigation of the Position of Gender Minorities]. Tasa-arvojulkaisuja 2012:1 (2012).Google Scholar
Väestörekisterikeskus [The Finnish Population Register Centre], Lausunto: Lääkintöhallituksen aloite väestökirja-asetuksen muuttamiseksi [Statement: The Initiative of the Finnish Board of Health to Amend the Population Registry Decree]. Doc. No. 26/350/87 (1987).Google Scholar
Valtakunnallinen terveydenhuollon eettinen neuvottelukunta [The Finnish Advisory Board on Social Welfare and Health Care Ethics], Lausuntopyyntö lobotomian aiheuttamien haittojen rahallisista korvauksista [Request for Comment on Financial Compensation for Harm caused by Lobotomy]. Doc. No. 44/59/97 (2000).Google Scholar
Valtakunnallinen terveydenhuollon eettinen neuvottelukunta [The Finnish Advisory Board on Social Welfare and Health Care Ethics], Eettisyyttä terveydenhuoltoon [Ethics in Medical Care]. ETENE Publication 5 (2002).Google Scholar
Valtioneuvoston kanslia [The Finnish Prime Minister’s Office], Saamelaisten totuus- ja sovintokomission asettamispäätös [The Decision to Establish a Truth and Reconciliation Commission for the Sámi]. Doc. No. VN/11265/2020 (2021).Google Scholar
Valtion Väestöpoliittinen komitea [The Finnish Population Policy Committee], Mietintö [Report]. KM 1941:17 (1941).Google Scholar
German Government Bill RegE 18/12038, Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur strafrechtlichen Rehabilitierung der nach dem 8. Mai 1945 wegen einvernehmlicher homosexueller Handlungen verurteilten Personen und zur Änderung des Einkommensteuergesetzes [Draft Act on Criminal Law Rehabilitation of People Convicted of Consensual Homosexual Acts after 8 May 1945 and an Amendment of the Income Tax Act] (2017).Google Scholar
Helsedirektoratet [The Norwegian Directorate of Health], Veiledning i behandling av steriliseringssaker [Guidelines for Processing Sterilisation Files]. Written by Karl Evang (1950).Google Scholar
Helsedirektoratet [The Norwegian Directorate of Health], Behandlingstilbudet til transseksuelle og transpersoner i Norge: Helsedirektoratets gjennomgang og vurderinger 2011 [The Treatment Offered to Transsexual and Trans People in Norway: A 2011 Review and Evaluations by the Norwegian Directorate of Health] (2011).Google Scholar
Helsedirektoratet [The Norwegian Directorate of Health], Gjennomgang av behandlingstilbudet til transseksuelle og transpersoner [Review of the Treatments Offered to Transsexual and Trans People] (2012).Google Scholar
Helsedirektoratet [The Norwegian Directorate of Health], Rett till rett kjønn – helse till alle kjønn [Right to the Right Gender – Health for All Genders] (2015).Google Scholar
Justis- og politidepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security], Instilling fra straffelovkomiteen, tredje del [Report from the Criminal Law Committee, Part Three] (1932).Google Scholar
Justis- og politidepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security], Lovgivning om menneskerettigheter [Legislation on Human Rights]. NOU 1993:18 (1993).Google Scholar
Justis- og politidepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security], St.meld.nr. 44 (2003–2004), Erstatningsordning for krigsbarn og erstatningsordninger for romanifolk/tatere og eldre utdanningsskadelidende samer og kvener [Compensation Schemes for War Children and Romani People/Tatere and Sámi and Kven Peoples Harmed by Education Policies] (2004).Google Scholar
Justiskomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Justice], Innst.O.nr.46, Instilling til lov om adgang til sterilisering m.v. [Report on Act on the Access to Sterilisation etc.] (1934).Google Scholar
Justiskomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Justice], Innst.S.nr.39 (1996–1997), Innstilling om forslag fra stortingsrepresentant Erling Folkvord [Report on Bill by MP Erling Folkvord] (1996).Google Scholar
Justiskomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Justice], Innst.O.nr.51 (1998–1999), Innstilling om lov om styrking av menneskerettane si stilling i norsk rett [Report on Act on Reinforcing Human Rights in Norwegian Law] (1999).Google Scholar
Justiskomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Justice], Innst.O.nr.92 (2002–2003), Innstilling om lov om endring i menneskerettsloven mv. [Report on Act on the Amendment of the Human Rights Act] (2003).Google Scholar
Justiskomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Justice], Innst.S.nr. 152 (2004–2005), Innstilling om erstatningsordning for krigsbarn og erstatningsordninger for romanifolk/tatere og eldre utdanningsskadelidende samer og kvener [Report on Compensation Scheme for War Children and Compensation Schemes for Romani People/Tatere and Sámi and Kven Peoples Suffering from Education Policies] (2004).Google Scholar
Justiskomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Justice], Innst.O.nr.115 (2008–2009), Innstilling om lov om endringar i menneskerettsloven mv. [Report on Act on Changes in the Human Rights Act etc.] (2009).Google Scholar
Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation], Assimilering og motstand: Norsk politikk overfor tatere/romanifolket fra 1850 til i dag [Assimilation and Resistance: Norwegian Politics concerning Tatere/the Romani people from 1850 to Today], NOU 2015:7 (2015a).Google Scholar
Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation], Vedlegg til NOU 2015:7 [Annex to NOU 2015:7] (2015b).Google Scholar
Kommunal- og regionaldepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Local Government], St.meld.nr. 15 (2000–2001) Nasjonale minoritetar i Noreg – Om statleg politikk overfor jødar, kvener, rom, romanifolket og skogfinnar [National Minorities in Norway – On State Politics regarding Jews, Kven People, Roma, Romani People and Forest Finns] (2000).Google Scholar
Kommunal- og regionaldepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Local Government], Erstatning til tvangssteriliserte romanifolk/tatere [Compensation to Forcibly Sterilised Romani People/Tatere] (2003).Google Scholar
Kommunalkomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Local Government and Public Administration], Innst.S.nr. 145 (2000–2001) Instilling fra kommunalkomiteen om Nasjonale minoritetar i Noreg – Om statleg politikk overfor jødar, kvener, rom, romanifolket og skogfinnar [Report from the Local Government Committee on National Minorities in Norway – About State Politics on Jews, Kven People, Roma, Romani People and Forest Finns] (2001).Google Scholar
Kontroll- og konstitusjonskomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Scrutiny and Constitutional Affairs], Innst.S.nr.172 (1993–1994) Innstilling om ny bestemmelse av menneskerettigheter eller folkerett i Grunnloven [Report concerning the Incorporation of Human Rights Conventions in Norwegian Law on a New Regulation of Human Rights or International Law in the Constitution] (1994).Google Scholar
Likestillings- og diskrimineringsombudet [The Norwegian Equality and Anti-discrimination Ombud], Særskilt økonomisk kompensasjonsordning for personer som ble sterilisert for å endre juridisk kjønn [A Specially Established Financial Compensation Scheme for People who were Sterilised to Amend their Legally Registered Gender]. Doc. No. 20/1049-3-HJFA (16 June 2020).Google Scholar
Medisinaldirektoratet [The Norwegian Directorate of Medicine], Veiledning i behandling av steriliseringssaker [Guidelines for Processing Sterilisation Files] (1938).Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Ot.prp.nr. 17 (1934), Lov om adgang til sterilisering m.v. [Act on the Access to Sterilisation Etc.].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill St.prp.nr. 83 (1951), Om innhentelse av Stortingets samtykke til at Norge tiltrer Europarådets konvensjon om beskyttelse av menneskerettighetene og de grunnleggende friheter [On Obtaining the Norwegian Parliament’s Approval of Norway’s Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Ot.prp.nr. 48 (1965–1966), Om lov om skadeerstatning i visse forhold [On Act on Compensation under Certain Circumstances].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Ot.prp.nr. 38 (1974–1975), Om lov om svangerskapsavbrudd [On Act on the Termination of Pregnancy].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Ot.prp.nr. 46 (1976–1977), Om lov on sterilisering m.v. [On Act on Sterilisation etc].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Ot.prp.nr. 3 (1998–1999), Om lov om styrking av menneskerettighetenes stilling i norsk rett [Government Bill on the Act on Reinforcing Human Rights in Norwegian Law].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill St.prp.nr. 3 (1998–1999), Om erstatning ved stråleskader etter brystkreftbehandling ved Radiumhospitalet 1975–86 [On Compensation for Radiation Damages after Breast Cancer Treatment at Radiumhospitalet 1975–86].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill St.prp.nr. 67 (2000–2001), Erstatning til norske statsborgere som satt i japansk fangenskap under 2. verdenskrig [Compensation to Norwegian Citizens who Were Prisoners of War in Japan During the Second World War].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Ot.prp.nr. 45 (2002–2003), Om lov om endring i menneskerettsloven mv. [Government Bill on Amendment of the Human Rights Act etc].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Ot.prp.nr. 63 (2005–2006), Om lov om endringer i lov om svangerskapsavbrudd og lov om sterilisering [On Act on Amendment in Act on Termination of Pregnancy and Act on Sterilisation].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Ot.prp.nr. 93 (2008–2009), Om lov om endringar i menneskerettsloven mv. [Government Bill on Changes in the Human Rights Act].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Prop. 88 L (2012–2013), Diskrimineringslovgivning [Discrimination Legislation].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Prop. 74 L (2015–2016), Lov om endring av juridisk kjønn [Act on Amendment of Legal Gender].Google Scholar
Regjeringsadvokaten [The Office of the Attorney General of Norway], Tilsvar til Oslo Tingrett [Plea before the Oslo Court of First Instance]. Doc. No. 17-132417TVI-OTIR/08 (2017).Google Scholar
Sosialdepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Social Affairs], Omstreiferne. Deres situasjon og samfunnets hjelpetiltak for dem [The Vagrants. Their Situation and Societal Aid Measures]. NOU 1980:42 (1980).Google Scholar
Sosialdepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Social Affairs], Utredning om lobotomi [Investigation on Lobotomy]. NOU 1992:25 (1992).Google Scholar
Sosialkomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Social Affairs], Innst.O.nr.62 (1976–77) Instilling om lov om sterilisering m.v. [Report on Act on Sterilisation Etc.] (1977).Google Scholar
Statens sivilrettsforvaltning [The Norwegian Civil Affairs Authority] Søknadsskjema [Application Forms], www.sivilrett.no/soeknadsskjema.304224.no.html.Google Scholar
Stortinget [The Norwegian Parliament], Stortingsforhandlinger [Norwegian Parliamentary Debates] (1934).Google Scholar
Stortinget [The Norwegian Parliament], Stortingsforhandlinger [Norwegian Parliamentary Debates] (2000).Google Scholar
Stortinget [The Norwegian Parliament], Stortingsforhandlinger [Norwegian Parliamentary Debates] (2002).Google Scholar
Stortinget [The Norwegian Parliament], Representantforslag 25 S (2020–2021) fra stortingsrepresentantene Nicholas Wilkinson, Solfrid Lerbrekk og Freddy André Øvstegård [Parliamentary Initiative 25 S (2020–2021) from the MPs Nicholas Wilkinson, Solfrid Lerbrekk and Freddy André Øvstegård] (2020).Google Scholar
Utenriksdepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs], St.meld.nr.21 (1999–2000) Menneskeverd i sentrum: Handlingsplan for menneskerettigheter [Focus on Human Dignity: Action Plan for Human Rights] (1999).Google Scholar
Arbetsmarknadsdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Employment], Jämställdhet i arbetslivet. Lag om jämställdhet [Equality in Working Life. Act on Equality]. SOU 1978:38 (1978).Google Scholar
Delegationen för mänskliga rättigheter i Sverige [The Delegation for Human Rights in Sweden], Ny struktur för skydd av de mänskliga rättigheterna [New Structure for the Protection of Human Rights]. SOU 2010:70 (2010 ).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Förslag till lag om sterilisering av vissa sinnessjuka, sinnesslöa eller av annan rubbning av själsverksamheten lidande personer [Proposal of Act concerning Sterilisation of Certain People who are Insane, Feebleminded or Suffering from Other Mental Disorders]. SOU 1933:22 (1933).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Betänkande med förslag till lagstiftning om avbrytande av havandeskap [Report with Proposal of Legislation concerning Termination of Pregnancy]. SOU 1935:15 (1935).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Åtgärder för bekämpande av homosexualitetens samhällsfarliga yttringar [Actions to Combat the Social Dangers of Homosexuality]. SOU 1941:3 (1941a).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Strafflagsberedningens promemoria med förslag till lag om kastrering m.m. [The Memorandum of the Penal Law Advisory Committee with Proposal of Castration Act etc.]. SOU 1941:24 (1941b).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Strafflagberedningens utlåtande med förslag till lagstiftning angående åtgärder mot homosexualitetens samhällsfarliga yttringar [The Report of the Penal Law Advisory Committee concerning Actions to Combat the Social Dangers of Homosexuality]. SOU 1941:32 (1941c).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Intersexuellas könstillhörighet [The Gender Recognition of Intersexuals]. SOU 1968:28 (1968).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Fri sterilisering [Free Sterilisation]. SOU 1974:25 (1974).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Medborgerliga fri- och rättigheter [Civil Freedoms and Rights]. SOU 1975:75 (1975).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Förstärkt skydd för fri- och rättigheter [Reinforced Protection for Freedoms and Rights]. SOU 1978:34 (1978).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Skadestånd och Europakonventionen [Compensation and the European Convention]. SOU 2010:87 (2010).Google Scholar
Konstitutionsutkottet [The Swedish Parliamentary Committee on the Constitution], Betänkande med anledning av propositionen 1973:90 med förslag till ny regeringsform och ny riksdagsordning m.m. jämte motioner [Report concerning Government Bill 1973:90 with Proposal of a New Government Act and a New Parliament Act etc.]. KU 1973:26 (1973).Google Scholar
Konstitutionsutkottet [The Swedish Parliamentary Committee on the Constitution], Betänkande med anledning av motioner om avslag på vilande förslag till ny regeringsform och ny riksdagsordning m.m. [Report based on Motions concerning Rejection of Proposals about a New Government Act and a New Parliament Act, etc.]. KU 1974:7 (1974).Google Scholar
Konstitutionsutkottet [The Swedish Parliamentary Committee on the Constitution], Betänkande med anledning av propositionen 1978/79:195 om förstärkt skydd för fri- och rättigheter m.m. jämte motioner [Report concerning the Government Bill 1978/79:195 on Strengthened Protection of Freedoms and Rights etc. with Bills]. KU 1978/79:39 (1979).Google Scholar
Konstitutionsutkottet [The Swedish Parliamentary Committee on the Constitution], Betänkande: Skadestånd och Europakonventionen [Report: Damages and the European Convention], KU 2017/18:12 (2018).Google Scholar
Kungliga medicinalstyrelsen [The Swedish Royal Board of Medicine], Råd och anvisningar rörande tillämpning av steriliserings- och abortlagarna [Advice and Instructions for the Implementation of the Sterilisation and Abortion Acts]. Meddelanden från Kungliga Medicinalstyrelsen [Messages from the Swedish Royal Board of Medicine] 84/1939 (1939).Google Scholar
Kungliga medicinalstyrelsen [The Swedish Royal Board of Medicine], Råd och anvisningar rörande tillämpning av 1941 års steriliseringslag och abortlagen [Advice and Instructions for the Implementation of the 1941 Sterilisation Act and the Abortion Act]. Meddelanden från Kungliga Medicinalstyrelsen [Messages from the Swedish Royal Board of Medicine] 88/1943 (1943).Google Scholar
Kungliga medicinalstyrelsen [The Swedish Royal Board of Medicine], Råd och anvisningar rörande tillämpning av 1941 års steriliseringslag och abortlagen. Till läkare och övriga medverkande [Advice and Instructions for the Implementation of the 1941 Sterilisation Act and the Abortion Act. To Medical Doctors and Other Participants]. Meddelanden från Kungliga Medicinalstyrelsen [Messages from the Swedish Royal Board of Medicine] 93/1947 (1947).Google Scholar
Kungliga medicinalstyrelsen [The Swedish Royal Board of Medicine], Allmän hälso- och sjukvård 1967 [Public Healthcare 1967] (1967).Google Scholar
Kungliga medicinalstyrelsen [The Swedish Royal Board of Medicine], Allmän hälso- och sjukvård 1969 [Public Healthcare 1969] (1969).Google Scholar
Regeringskansliet [The Government Offices of Sweden], Den mörka och okända historien. Vitbok om övergrepp och kränkningar av romer under 1900-talet [The Dark and Unknown History. Report on Abuse and Violations against Romani People during the 20th Century]. Ds 2014:8.Google Scholar
Riksdagen [The Swedish Parliament], Första kammaren: Motion nr. 38 [First Chamber Bill No. 38] (1922).Google Scholar
Riksdagens ombudsmän [The Swedish Parliamentary Ombudsmen], Ämbetsberättelse [Annual Report] (1947).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Betänkande med förslag till steriliseringslag [Report Proposing Sterilisation Act]. SOU 1929:14 (1929).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Betänkande angående sterilisering [Report Concerning Sterilisation]. SOU 1936:22 (1936).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Steriliseringsfrågor i Sverige 1935–1975 – Ekonomisk ersättning [Sterilisation Issues in Sweden 1935–1975 – Financial Compensation]. SOU 1999:2 (1999).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Från politik till praktik – De svenska steriliseringslagarna 1935–1975 [From Policy to Practice – The Swedish Sterilisation Laws 1935–1975]. SOU 2000:22 (2000a).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Steriliseringsfrågan i Sverige [The Sterilisation Issue in Sweden]. SOU 2000:20 (2000b).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Rapport över Steriliseringsersättningssnämndens verksamhet [Report concerning the Activities of the Sterilisation Compensation Committee] (2004).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Ändrad könstillhörighet – förslag till ny lag [Gender Recognition – Proposal regarding New Legislation]. SOU 2007:16 (2007).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Barnen som samhället svek – åtgärder med anledning av övergrepp och allvarliga försummelser i samhällsvården [The Children Let Down by Society – Actions due to Abuse and Serious Negligence in State Social Care]. SOU 2011:9 (2011).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Förslag till lag om ersättning till personer som har fått ändrad könstillhörighet fastställd i vissa fall [Proposition for Act on Compensation to People who Have Obtained Legal Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances]. Ds 2017:6 (2017a).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Lagrådsremiss: Statlig ersättning till personer som fått ändrad könstillhörighet i vissa fall [Law Council Referral: State Compensation to People Have Obtained Legal Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances] (2017b).Google Scholar
Socialstyrelsen [The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare], Transsexuella och övriga personer med könsidentitetsstörningar. Rättsliga villkor för fastställande av könstillhörighet samt vård och stöd. [Transsexuals and Other People with Gender Identity Incongruence. Legal Conditions for Gender Recognition, Care and Support] Socialstyrelsen 2010-6-31 (2010).Google Scholar
Socialutskottet [The Swedish Parliamentary Committee on Health and Welfare], Nya regler för ändrad könstillhörighet [Changed Rules regarding Legal Gender Recognition]. Socialutskottets betänkande2011/13:SoU23 (2012).Google Scholar
Socialutskottet [The Swedish Parliamentary Committee on Health and Welfare], Ersättning av staten till personer som utsatts för övergrepp eller försummelser i samhällsvården [State Compensation to People who Have Experienced Abuse or Negligence in State Social Care]. Socialutskottets betänkande 2012/13: SoU3 (2012).Google Scholar
Socialutskottet [The Swedish Parliamentary Committee on Health and Welfare], Upphävande av kravet på sterilisering för ändrad könstillhörighet [The Abolition of the Sterilisation Precondition for Legal Gender Recognition]. Socialutskottets betänkande 2012/13:SoU24 (2013).Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1934:103, Kunglig Majestäts proposition med förslag till lag om sterilisering av vissa sinnessjuka, sinnesslöa eller andra som lida av rubbad själsverksamhet [Royal Bill with Proposal of Act on Sterilisation of Certain People who are Insane, Feebleminded or Suffering from Other Mental Disorders].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1941:13, Kunglig Majestäts proposition med förslag till lag om sterilisering m.m. [Royal Bill with Proposal of Sterilisation Act etc.]Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1944:14, Kunglig Majestäts proposition med förslag till lag om kastrering, m.m. [Royal Bill with Proposal of Castration Act, etc.].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1951:165, Kunglig Majestäts proposition angående godkännande av Sveriges anslutning till Europarådets konvention angående skydd för de mänskliga rättigheterna och de grundläggande friheterna [Royal Bill concerning the Approval of Sweden Joining the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1966:33, Kunglig Majestäts proposition om förklaring enligt artikel 46 i Europarådets konvention angående skydd för de mänskliga rättigheterna och de grundläggande friheterna [Royal Bill on Declaration According to Article 46 in the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1971:30, Kunglig Majestäts proposition med förslag till lag om allmänna förvaltningsdomstolar, m.m. [Royal Bill with Proposal of Act on Administrative Courts, etc.].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1972:5, Kunglig Majestäts proposition med förslag till skadeståndslag m.m. [Royal Bill with Proposal of Liability Act etc].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1972:6, Kunglig Majestäts proposition med förslag till lag om fastställande av könstillhörighet i vissa fall [Royal Bill with Proposal of Act on Legal Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1973:90, Kunglig Majestäts propsition med förslag till ny regeringsform och ny riksdagsordning m.m. [Royal Bill with Proposal of a New Government Act and a New Parliament Act etc].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1974 :70, Kunglig Majestäts proposition med förslag till abortlag, m.m. [Royal Bill with Proposal of Abortion Act etc].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1975 :18, Förslag till steriliseringslag, m.m. [Proposal of Sterilisation Law, etc.].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1978/79:175, Förslag till lag om jämställdhet mellan män och kvinnor i arbetslivet, m.m. [Proposal of Act on Equality between Men and Women in Working Life, etc].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1978/79:195, Förstärkt skydd för fri- och rättigheter m.m. [Reinforced Protection for Freedoms and Rights etc].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1992/93:197, Ändring i lagen om fastställande av könstillhörighet i vissa fall, m.m. [Amendment of the Act on Legal Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances etc].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1998/99:71, Ersättning av staten till steriliserade i vissa fall [Compensation by the State to Sterilised People under Certain Circumstances].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 2009/10:80, En reformerad grundlag [A Reformed Constitution].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 2011/12:142, Ändrad könstillhörighet [Legal Gender Recognition].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 2011/12:160, Ersättning av staten till personer som utsatts för övergrepp eller försummelser i samhällsvården [State Compensation to People who Have Experienced Abuse and Negligence in State Social Care].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 2012/13:107, Upphörande av kravet på sterilisering för ändrad könstillhörighet [Abolition of the Requirement of Sterilisation for Gender Recognition].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 2017/18:7, Skadestånd och Europakonventionen [Damages and the European Convention].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 2017/18:64, Statlig ersättning till personer som har fått ändrad könstillhörighet fastställd i vissa fall [State Compensation to People who Have Obtained Legal Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Letter, Redogörelse för steriliseringsfrågan i Sverige åren 1935–1975 och regeringens åtgärder [Report on the Sterilisation Issue in Sweden 1935–1975 and the Measures Taken by the Government]. Skr. 2000/01:73.Google Scholar
Aborttikomitea [The Finnish Abortion Committee], Mietintö [Report]. KM 1968:A11 (1969).Google Scholar
Citizens’ Initiative KAA 6/2021, Oikeus olla – kansalaisaloite oikeudenmukaisemman translain puolesta [The Right to Exist – A Citizens’ Initiative for a Fairer Trans Act].Google Scholar
Eduskunnan apulaisoikeusasiamies [Finnish Deputy Parliamentary Ombudsman], Kysymys sisäasiainministeriölle [Question for the Finnish Ministry of the Interior]. Doc. No. 2486/2/98 (4 December 1998).Google Scholar
Eduskunnan oikeusasiamies [The Finnish Parliamentary Ombudsman], Letter No. 1367. Doc. No. 683/2/91 (24 April 1991).Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 112/1934, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle sterilisoimislaiksi [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding a Sterilisation Act].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 58/1948, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle kastroimislaiksi [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding a Castration Act].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 59/1948, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle sterilisoimislaiksi [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding aSterilisation Act].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 60/1948, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle laiksi raskaudentilan keskeyttämisestä sekä laiksi rikoslain muuttamisesta [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding an Act on Termination of Pregnancy and an Amendment of the Criminal Code].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 104/1969, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle laiksi raskaudentilan keskeyttämisestä sekä laiksi rikoslain muuttamisesta [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding an Act on Termination of Pregnancy and an Amendment of the Criminal Code].Google Scholar
Finnish Government, Bill HE 105/1969, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle steriloimislaiksi [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding a Sterilisation Act].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 106/1969, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle kastroimislaiksi [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding a Castration Act].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 187/1973, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle Vahingonkorvausta koskevaksi lainsäädännöksi [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding a Liability Act].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 309/1993, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle perustuslakien perusoikeussäännösten muuttamisesta [Government Bill to the Parliament on the Revision of Constitutional Rights].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 1/1998, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle uudeksi Suomen Hallitusmuodoksi [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding a New Finnish Government Act].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 200/2000, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle laiksi virallistetusta parisuhteesta [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding an Act on Registered Partnership].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 207/2000, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle laeiksi raskauden keskeyttämisestä annetun lain ja steriloimislain muuttamisesta [Government Bill to the Parliament regarding the Amendment of the Act on Termination of Pregnancy and the Sterilisation Act].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 56/2001, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle laiksi sukupuolen vahvistamisesta eräissä tapauksissa ja eräiksi siihen liittyviksi laeiksi [Government Bill to the Parliament, Act on Legal Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances and Connected Acts].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 19/2014, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle yhdenvertaisuuslaiksi ja eräiksi siihen liittyviksi laeiksi [Government Bill to the Parliament, Non-Discrimination Act and Related Legislation].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 159/2014, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle laiksi valtion vahingonkorvaustoiminnasta sekä eräiksi siihen liittyviksi laeiksi [Government Bill to the Parliament for an Act on Administration of State Liability and Some Connected Acts].Google Scholar
Finnish Government Bill HE 189/2022, Hallituksen esitys eduskunnalle laiksi sukupuolen vahvistamisesta ja siihen liittyviksi laeiksi [Government Bill regarding an Act on Gender Recognition and Connected Legislation].Google Scholar
Finnish Parliamentary Bill LA 43/2016, Lakialoite laiksi transseksuaalin sukupuolen vahvistamisesta annetun lain 1 §:n muuttamisesta [Bill to Amend Section 1 of the Act on Gender Recognition of Transsexuals].Google Scholar
Ihmisoikeusvaltuuskunta [The Finnish Human Rights Delegation], Suomi rikkoo Euroopan ihmisoikeussopimusta – Ihmisoikeusvaltuuskunta vaatii translain kiirellistä uudistamista [Finland Violates the European Convention on Human Rights – The Finnish Human Rights Delegation Demands an Immediate Change of the Trans Act] (2017).Google Scholar
Komitea, joka on asetettu harkitsemaan tylsämielisten y.m. sterilisoimista koskevaa kysymystä [The Finnish Committee appointed to Consider the Question of Sterilisation of the Feebleminded etc.], Mietintö [Report]. KM 1929:5 (1929).Google Scholar
Lääkintöhallitus [The Finnish Board of Health], Päätös [Decision]. Doc. No. 11083/38/71 (1971).Google Scholar
Lääkintöhallitus [The Finnish Board of Health], Ohjekirje [Guidelines]. Doc. No. 3905/02/79 (1979).Google Scholar
Lainvalmistelukunta [The Finnish Preparatory Legislative Committee], Ehdotus hallituksen esitykseksi eduskunnalle sterilisoimislaiksi [Proposal for Government Bill to Parliament, Sterilisation Act]. LVM 1947:3 (1947).Google Scholar
Lakivaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Legal Affairs Committee], Lausunto [Statement]. LaVL 4/1948 (1948)Google Scholar
Oikeusministeriö [The Finnish Ministry of Justice], Seksuaali- ja sukupuolivähemmistöön kuuluvien perus- ja ihmisoikeudet Suomessa [Constitutional and Human Rights for Sexual and Gender Minorities in Finland]. OM 34/2014 (2014).Google Scholar
Perustuslakivaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Constitutional Law Committee], Mietintö [Report]. PeVM 25/94 (1994).Google Scholar
Perustuslakivaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Constitutional Law Committee], Mietintö [Report]. PeVM 3/95 (1995).Google Scholar
Perustuslakivaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Constitutional Law Committee], Mietintö [Report]. PeVM 10/1998 (1998).Google Scholar
Perustuslakivaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Constitutional Law Committee], Mietintö [Report]. PeVM 1/1999 (1999).Google Scholar
Prime Minister Antti Rinne’s Government, Inclusive and Competent Finland – A Socially, Economically and Ecologically Sustainable Society (6 June 2019).Google Scholar
Prime Minister Sanna Marin’s Government, Inclusive and Competent Finland – A Socially, Economically and Ecologically Sustainable Society (10 December 2019).Google Scholar
Sisäasiainministerö [The Finnish Ministry of the Interior], Lausunto [Statement]. Doc. No. 37/032/98 (1 March 1999).Google Scholar
Suuri valiokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Grand Committee], Mietintö [Report]. SuVM 95/1949 (1949).Google Scholar
Suuri valiokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Grand Committee], Mietintö [Report]. SuVM 96/1949 (1949).Google Scholar
Suuri valiokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Grand Committee], Mietintö [Report]. SuVM 97/1949 (1949).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö [The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health], Työryhmän asettaminen [Appointment of Working Group]. Doc. No. 6984/04/87 (1987).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö [The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health], Lakiesitys sukupuoleen kuulumisen vahvistamisesta eräissä tapauksissa [Legislation Draft on Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances]. Doc. No. STM/268/011/1991 (1991).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö [The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health], Transseksuaalien aseman kehittämistyöryhmän muistio [Memorandum of the Working Group on the Position of Transsexuals]. STM 2000:2 (2000).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö [The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health], Sukupuolen oikeudellisen vahvistamisen edellytykset [The Preconditions for Legal Gender Recognition]. STM 2015:23 (2015).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö [The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health], Lastensuojelun sijaishuollon epäkohdat ja lasten kaltoinkohtelu 1937–1983 [Shortcomings in Substitute Care of the Child Protection Services and Maltreatment of Children 1937–1983]. STM 2016:22 (2016a).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö [The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health], Official Apology to Everyone Who Suffered Maltreatment in Foster Care in the Past Decades, stm.fi/sv/-/lastensuojelun-sijaishuollossa-kaltoin-kohdelluilta-pyydettiin-anteeksi?languageId=en_US (20 November 2016b).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö [The Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health], Vaihtoehtoiset sääntelymallit sukupuolivähemmistöjen oikeudellisen aseman järjestämiseksi: Translainsäädännön uudistamisen valmistelutyöryhmä [Alternative Regulatory Models to Organise the Legal Position of Gender Minorities: The Working Group to Revise the Trans Act] (2020).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Social Affairs and Health Committee], Protocol No. 4/2002 (2002a).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Social Affairs and Health Committee], Protocol No. 6/2002 (2002b).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Social Affairs and Health Committee], Protocol No. 10/2002 (2002c).Google Scholar
Sosiaali- ja terveysvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Social Affairs and Health Committee], Mietintö [Report]. StVM 7/2002 (2002).Google Scholar
Stakes [The Finnish Centre for Research and Development on Health and Welfare], Transseksuaalien hoito- ja tukipalvelujen kehittämistyöryhmän muistio [Report of the Working Group on the Development of Health Care and Support Services for Transsexuals]. Stakes Report No. 18/1994 (1994).Google Scholar
Talousvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Commerce Committee], Mietintö [Report]. TaVM 3/1949 (1949).Google Scholar
Talousvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Commerce Committee], Mietintö [Report]. TaVM 4/1949 (1949).Google Scholar
Talousvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Commerce Committee], Mietintö [Report]. TaVM 5/1949 (1949).Google Scholar
Talousvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Commerce Committee], Mietintö [Report]. TaVM 16/1970 (1970).Google Scholar
Talousvaliokunta [The Finnish Parliamentary Commerce Committee], Mietintö [Report]. TaVM 17/1970 (1970).Google Scholar
Tasa-arvovaltuutettu [The Finnish Ombudsman for Equality], Lisääntymiskyvyttömyysvaatimus rikkoo transsukupuolisten ihmisoikeuksia [The Infertility Requirement Violates Transgender People’s Human Rights], www.tasa-arvo.fi/-/tasa-arvovaltuutettu-lisaantymiskyvyttomyysvaatimus-rikkoo-transsukupuolisten-ihmisoikeuksia (21 November 2011).Google Scholar
Tasa-arvovaltuutettu [The Finnish Ombudsman for Equality], Selvitys sukupuolivähemmistöjen asemasta [Investigation of the Position of Gender Minorities]. Tasa-arvojulkaisuja 2012:1 (2012).Google Scholar
Väestörekisterikeskus [The Finnish Population Register Centre], Lausunto: Lääkintöhallituksen aloite väestökirja-asetuksen muuttamiseksi [Statement: The Initiative of the Finnish Board of Health to Amend the Population Registry Decree]. Doc. No. 26/350/87 (1987).Google Scholar
Valtakunnallinen terveydenhuollon eettinen neuvottelukunta [The Finnish Advisory Board on Social Welfare and Health Care Ethics], Lausuntopyyntö lobotomian aiheuttamien haittojen rahallisista korvauksista [Request for Comment on Financial Compensation for Harm caused by Lobotomy]. Doc. No. 44/59/97 (2000).Google Scholar
Valtakunnallinen terveydenhuollon eettinen neuvottelukunta [The Finnish Advisory Board on Social Welfare and Health Care Ethics], Eettisyyttä terveydenhuoltoon [Ethics in Medical Care]. ETENE Publication 5 (2002).Google Scholar
Valtioneuvoston kanslia [The Finnish Prime Minister’s Office], Saamelaisten totuus- ja sovintokomission asettamispäätös [The Decision to Establish a Truth and Reconciliation Commission for the Sámi]. Doc. No. VN/11265/2020 (2021).Google Scholar
Valtion Väestöpoliittinen komitea [The Finnish Population Policy Committee], Mietintö [Report]. KM 1941:17 (1941).Google Scholar
German Government Bill RegE 18/12038, Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur strafrechtlichen Rehabilitierung der nach dem 8. Mai 1945 wegen einvernehmlicher homosexueller Handlungen verurteilten Personen und zur Änderung des Einkommensteuergesetzes [Draft Act on Criminal Law Rehabilitation of People Convicted of Consensual Homosexual Acts after 8 May 1945 and an Amendment of the Income Tax Act] (2017).Google Scholar
Helsedirektoratet [The Norwegian Directorate of Health], Veiledning i behandling av steriliseringssaker [Guidelines for Processing Sterilisation Files]. Written by Karl Evang (1950).Google Scholar
Helsedirektoratet [The Norwegian Directorate of Health], Behandlingstilbudet til transseksuelle og transpersoner i Norge: Helsedirektoratets gjennomgang og vurderinger 2011 [The Treatment Offered to Transsexual and Trans People in Norway: A 2011 Review and Evaluations by the Norwegian Directorate of Health] (2011).Google Scholar
Helsedirektoratet [The Norwegian Directorate of Health], Gjennomgang av behandlingstilbudet til transseksuelle og transpersoner [Review of the Treatments Offered to Transsexual and Trans People] (2012).Google Scholar
Helsedirektoratet [The Norwegian Directorate of Health], Rett till rett kjønn – helse till alle kjønn [Right to the Right Gender – Health for All Genders] (2015).Google Scholar
Justis- og politidepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security], Instilling fra straffelovkomiteen, tredje del [Report from the Criminal Law Committee, Part Three] (1932).Google Scholar
Justis- og politidepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security], Lovgivning om menneskerettigheter [Legislation on Human Rights]. NOU 1993:18 (1993).Google Scholar
Justis- og politidepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security], St.meld.nr. 44 (2003–2004), Erstatningsordning for krigsbarn og erstatningsordninger for romanifolk/tatere og eldre utdanningsskadelidende samer og kvener [Compensation Schemes for War Children and Romani People/Tatere and Sámi and Kven Peoples Harmed by Education Policies] (2004).Google Scholar
Justiskomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Justice], Innst.O.nr.46, Instilling til lov om adgang til sterilisering m.v. [Report on Act on the Access to Sterilisation etc.] (1934).Google Scholar
Justiskomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Justice], Innst.S.nr.39 (1996–1997), Innstilling om forslag fra stortingsrepresentant Erling Folkvord [Report on Bill by MP Erling Folkvord] (1996).Google Scholar
Justiskomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Justice], Innst.O.nr.51 (1998–1999), Innstilling om lov om styrking av menneskerettane si stilling i norsk rett [Report on Act on Reinforcing Human Rights in Norwegian Law] (1999).Google Scholar
Justiskomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Justice], Innst.O.nr.92 (2002–2003), Innstilling om lov om endring i menneskerettsloven mv. [Report on Act on the Amendment of the Human Rights Act] (2003).Google Scholar
Justiskomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Justice], Innst.S.nr. 152 (2004–2005), Innstilling om erstatningsordning for krigsbarn og erstatningsordninger for romanifolk/tatere og eldre utdanningsskadelidende samer og kvener [Report on Compensation Scheme for War Children and Compensation Schemes for Romani People/Tatere and Sámi and Kven Peoples Suffering from Education Policies] (2004).Google Scholar
Justiskomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Justice], Innst.O.nr.115 (2008–2009), Innstilling om lov om endringar i menneskerettsloven mv. [Report on Act on Changes in the Human Rights Act etc.] (2009).Google Scholar
Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation], Assimilering og motstand: Norsk politikk overfor tatere/romanifolket fra 1850 til i dag [Assimilation and Resistance: Norwegian Politics concerning Tatere/the Romani people from 1850 to Today], NOU 2015:7 (2015a).Google Scholar
Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation], Vedlegg til NOU 2015:7 [Annex to NOU 2015:7] (2015b).Google Scholar
Kommunal- og regionaldepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Local Government], St.meld.nr. 15 (2000–2001) Nasjonale minoritetar i Noreg – Om statleg politikk overfor jødar, kvener, rom, romanifolket og skogfinnar [National Minorities in Norway – On State Politics regarding Jews, Kven People, Roma, Romani People and Forest Finns] (2000).Google Scholar
Kommunal- og regionaldepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Local Government], Erstatning til tvangssteriliserte romanifolk/tatere [Compensation to Forcibly Sterilised Romani People/Tatere] (2003).Google Scholar
Kommunalkomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Local Government and Public Administration], Innst.S.nr. 145 (2000–2001) Instilling fra kommunalkomiteen om Nasjonale minoritetar i Noreg – Om statleg politikk overfor jødar, kvener, rom, romanifolket og skogfinnar [Report from the Local Government Committee on National Minorities in Norway – About State Politics on Jews, Kven People, Roma, Romani People and Forest Finns] (2001).Google Scholar
Kontroll- og konstitusjonskomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Scrutiny and Constitutional Affairs], Innst.S.nr.172 (1993–1994) Innstilling om ny bestemmelse av menneskerettigheter eller folkerett i Grunnloven [Report concerning the Incorporation of Human Rights Conventions in Norwegian Law on a New Regulation of Human Rights or International Law in the Constitution] (1994).Google Scholar
Likestillings- og diskrimineringsombudet [The Norwegian Equality and Anti-discrimination Ombud], Særskilt økonomisk kompensasjonsordning for personer som ble sterilisert for å endre juridisk kjønn [A Specially Established Financial Compensation Scheme for People who were Sterilised to Amend their Legally Registered Gender]. Doc. No. 20/1049-3-HJFA (16 June 2020).Google Scholar
Medisinaldirektoratet [The Norwegian Directorate of Medicine], Veiledning i behandling av steriliseringssaker [Guidelines for Processing Sterilisation Files] (1938).Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Ot.prp.nr. 17 (1934), Lov om adgang til sterilisering m.v. [Act on the Access to Sterilisation Etc.].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill St.prp.nr. 83 (1951), Om innhentelse av Stortingets samtykke til at Norge tiltrer Europarådets konvensjon om beskyttelse av menneskerettighetene og de grunnleggende friheter [On Obtaining the Norwegian Parliament’s Approval of Norway’s Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Ot.prp.nr. 48 (1965–1966), Om lov om skadeerstatning i visse forhold [On Act on Compensation under Certain Circumstances].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Ot.prp.nr. 38 (1974–1975), Om lov om svangerskapsavbrudd [On Act on the Termination of Pregnancy].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Ot.prp.nr. 46 (1976–1977), Om lov on sterilisering m.v. [On Act on Sterilisation etc].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Ot.prp.nr. 3 (1998–1999), Om lov om styrking av menneskerettighetenes stilling i norsk rett [Government Bill on the Act on Reinforcing Human Rights in Norwegian Law].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill St.prp.nr. 3 (1998–1999), Om erstatning ved stråleskader etter brystkreftbehandling ved Radiumhospitalet 1975–86 [On Compensation for Radiation Damages after Breast Cancer Treatment at Radiumhospitalet 1975–86].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill St.prp.nr. 67 (2000–2001), Erstatning til norske statsborgere som satt i japansk fangenskap under 2. verdenskrig [Compensation to Norwegian Citizens who Were Prisoners of War in Japan During the Second World War].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Ot.prp.nr. 45 (2002–2003), Om lov om endring i menneskerettsloven mv. [Government Bill on Amendment of the Human Rights Act etc].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Ot.prp.nr. 63 (2005–2006), Om lov om endringer i lov om svangerskapsavbrudd og lov om sterilisering [On Act on Amendment in Act on Termination of Pregnancy and Act on Sterilisation].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Ot.prp.nr. 93 (2008–2009), Om lov om endringar i menneskerettsloven mv. [Government Bill on Changes in the Human Rights Act].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Prop. 88 L (2012–2013), Diskrimineringslovgivning [Discrimination Legislation].Google Scholar
Norwegian Government Bill Prop. 74 L (2015–2016), Lov om endring av juridisk kjønn [Act on Amendment of Legal Gender].Google Scholar
Regjeringsadvokaten [The Office of the Attorney General of Norway], Tilsvar til Oslo Tingrett [Plea before the Oslo Court of First Instance]. Doc. No. 17-132417TVI-OTIR/08 (2017).Google Scholar
Sosialdepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Social Affairs], Omstreiferne. Deres situasjon og samfunnets hjelpetiltak for dem [The Vagrants. Their Situation and Societal Aid Measures]. NOU 1980:42 (1980).Google Scholar
Sosialdepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Social Affairs], Utredning om lobotomi [Investigation on Lobotomy]. NOU 1992:25 (1992).Google Scholar
Sosialkomiteen [The Norwegian Parliamentary Committee on Social Affairs], Innst.O.nr.62 (1976–77) Instilling om lov om sterilisering m.v. [Report on Act on Sterilisation Etc.] (1977).Google Scholar
Statens sivilrettsforvaltning [The Norwegian Civil Affairs Authority] Søknadsskjema [Application Forms], www.sivilrett.no/soeknadsskjema.304224.no.html.Google Scholar
Stortinget [The Norwegian Parliament], Stortingsforhandlinger [Norwegian Parliamentary Debates] (1934).Google Scholar
Stortinget [The Norwegian Parliament], Stortingsforhandlinger [Norwegian Parliamentary Debates] (2000).Google Scholar
Stortinget [The Norwegian Parliament], Stortingsforhandlinger [Norwegian Parliamentary Debates] (2002).Google Scholar
Stortinget [The Norwegian Parliament], Representantforslag 25 S (2020–2021) fra stortingsrepresentantene Nicholas Wilkinson, Solfrid Lerbrekk og Freddy André Øvstegård [Parliamentary Initiative 25 S (2020–2021) from the MPs Nicholas Wilkinson, Solfrid Lerbrekk and Freddy André Øvstegård] (2020).Google Scholar
Utenriksdepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs], St.meld.nr.21 (1999–2000) Menneskeverd i sentrum: Handlingsplan for menneskerettigheter [Focus on Human Dignity: Action Plan for Human Rights] (1999).Google Scholar
Arbetsmarknadsdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Employment], Jämställdhet i arbetslivet. Lag om jämställdhet [Equality in Working Life. Act on Equality]. SOU 1978:38 (1978).Google Scholar
Delegationen för mänskliga rättigheter i Sverige [The Delegation for Human Rights in Sweden], Ny struktur för skydd av de mänskliga rättigheterna [New Structure for the Protection of Human Rights]. SOU 2010:70 (2010 ).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Förslag till lag om sterilisering av vissa sinnessjuka, sinnesslöa eller av annan rubbning av själsverksamheten lidande personer [Proposal of Act concerning Sterilisation of Certain People who are Insane, Feebleminded or Suffering from Other Mental Disorders]. SOU 1933:22 (1933).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Betänkande med förslag till lagstiftning om avbrytande av havandeskap [Report with Proposal of Legislation concerning Termination of Pregnancy]. SOU 1935:15 (1935).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Åtgärder för bekämpande av homosexualitetens samhällsfarliga yttringar [Actions to Combat the Social Dangers of Homosexuality]. SOU 1941:3 (1941a).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Strafflagsberedningens promemoria med förslag till lag om kastrering m.m. [The Memorandum of the Penal Law Advisory Committee with Proposal of Castration Act etc.]. SOU 1941:24 (1941b).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Strafflagberedningens utlåtande med förslag till lagstiftning angående åtgärder mot homosexualitetens samhällsfarliga yttringar [The Report of the Penal Law Advisory Committee concerning Actions to Combat the Social Dangers of Homosexuality]. SOU 1941:32 (1941c).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Intersexuellas könstillhörighet [The Gender Recognition of Intersexuals]. SOU 1968:28 (1968).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Fri sterilisering [Free Sterilisation]. SOU 1974:25 (1974).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Medborgerliga fri- och rättigheter [Civil Freedoms and Rights]. SOU 1975:75 (1975).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Förstärkt skydd för fri- och rättigheter [Reinforced Protection for Freedoms and Rights]. SOU 1978:34 (1978).Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Justice], Skadestånd och Europakonventionen [Compensation and the European Convention]. SOU 2010:87 (2010).Google Scholar
Konstitutionsutkottet [The Swedish Parliamentary Committee on the Constitution], Betänkande med anledning av propositionen 1973:90 med förslag till ny regeringsform och ny riksdagsordning m.m. jämte motioner [Report concerning Government Bill 1973:90 with Proposal of a New Government Act and a New Parliament Act etc.]. KU 1973:26 (1973).Google Scholar
Konstitutionsutkottet [The Swedish Parliamentary Committee on the Constitution], Betänkande med anledning av motioner om avslag på vilande förslag till ny regeringsform och ny riksdagsordning m.m. [Report based on Motions concerning Rejection of Proposals about a New Government Act and a New Parliament Act, etc.]. KU 1974:7 (1974).Google Scholar
Konstitutionsutkottet [The Swedish Parliamentary Committee on the Constitution], Betänkande med anledning av propositionen 1978/79:195 om förstärkt skydd för fri- och rättigheter m.m. jämte motioner [Report concerning the Government Bill 1978/79:195 on Strengthened Protection of Freedoms and Rights etc. with Bills]. KU 1978/79:39 (1979).Google Scholar
Konstitutionsutkottet [The Swedish Parliamentary Committee on the Constitution], Betänkande: Skadestånd och Europakonventionen [Report: Damages and the European Convention], KU 2017/18:12 (2018).Google Scholar
Kungliga medicinalstyrelsen [The Swedish Royal Board of Medicine], Råd och anvisningar rörande tillämpning av steriliserings- och abortlagarna [Advice and Instructions for the Implementation of the Sterilisation and Abortion Acts]. Meddelanden från Kungliga Medicinalstyrelsen [Messages from the Swedish Royal Board of Medicine] 84/1939 (1939).Google Scholar
Kungliga medicinalstyrelsen [The Swedish Royal Board of Medicine], Råd och anvisningar rörande tillämpning av 1941 års steriliseringslag och abortlagen [Advice and Instructions for the Implementation of the 1941 Sterilisation Act and the Abortion Act]. Meddelanden från Kungliga Medicinalstyrelsen [Messages from the Swedish Royal Board of Medicine] 88/1943 (1943).Google Scholar
Kungliga medicinalstyrelsen [The Swedish Royal Board of Medicine], Råd och anvisningar rörande tillämpning av 1941 års steriliseringslag och abortlagen. Till läkare och övriga medverkande [Advice and Instructions for the Implementation of the 1941 Sterilisation Act and the Abortion Act. To Medical Doctors and Other Participants]. Meddelanden från Kungliga Medicinalstyrelsen [Messages from the Swedish Royal Board of Medicine] 93/1947 (1947).Google Scholar
Kungliga medicinalstyrelsen [The Swedish Royal Board of Medicine], Allmän hälso- och sjukvård 1967 [Public Healthcare 1967] (1967).Google Scholar
Kungliga medicinalstyrelsen [The Swedish Royal Board of Medicine], Allmän hälso- och sjukvård 1969 [Public Healthcare 1969] (1969).Google Scholar
Regeringskansliet [The Government Offices of Sweden], Den mörka och okända historien. Vitbok om övergrepp och kränkningar av romer under 1900-talet [The Dark and Unknown History. Report on Abuse and Violations against Romani People during the 20th Century]. Ds 2014:8.Google Scholar
Riksdagen [The Swedish Parliament], Första kammaren: Motion nr. 38 [First Chamber Bill No. 38] (1922).Google Scholar
Riksdagens ombudsmän [The Swedish Parliamentary Ombudsmen], Ämbetsberättelse [Annual Report] (1947).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Betänkande med förslag till steriliseringslag [Report Proposing Sterilisation Act]. SOU 1929:14 (1929).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Betänkande angående sterilisering [Report Concerning Sterilisation]. SOU 1936:22 (1936).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Steriliseringsfrågor i Sverige 1935–1975 – Ekonomisk ersättning [Sterilisation Issues in Sweden 1935–1975 – Financial Compensation]. SOU 1999:2 (1999).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Från politik till praktik – De svenska steriliseringslagarna 1935–1975 [From Policy to Practice – The Swedish Sterilisation Laws 1935–1975]. SOU 2000:22 (2000a).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Steriliseringsfrågan i Sverige [The Sterilisation Issue in Sweden]. SOU 2000:20 (2000b).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Rapport över Steriliseringsersättningssnämndens verksamhet [Report concerning the Activities of the Sterilisation Compensation Committee] (2004).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Ändrad könstillhörighet – förslag till ny lag [Gender Recognition – Proposal regarding New Legislation]. SOU 2007:16 (2007).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Barnen som samhället svek – åtgärder med anledning av övergrepp och allvarliga försummelser i samhällsvården [The Children Let Down by Society – Actions due to Abuse and Serious Negligence in State Social Care]. SOU 2011:9 (2011).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Förslag till lag om ersättning till personer som har fått ändrad könstillhörighet fastställd i vissa fall [Proposition for Act on Compensation to People who Have Obtained Legal Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances]. Ds 2017:6 (2017a).Google Scholar
Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Lagrådsremiss: Statlig ersättning till personer som fått ändrad könstillhörighet i vissa fall [Law Council Referral: State Compensation to People Have Obtained Legal Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances] (2017b).Google Scholar
Socialstyrelsen [The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare], Transsexuella och övriga personer med könsidentitetsstörningar. Rättsliga villkor för fastställande av könstillhörighet samt vård och stöd. [Transsexuals and Other People with Gender Identity Incongruence. Legal Conditions for Gender Recognition, Care and Support] Socialstyrelsen 2010-6-31 (2010).Google Scholar
Socialutskottet [The Swedish Parliamentary Committee on Health and Welfare], Nya regler för ändrad könstillhörighet [Changed Rules regarding Legal Gender Recognition]. Socialutskottets betänkande2011/13:SoU23 (2012).Google Scholar
Socialutskottet [The Swedish Parliamentary Committee on Health and Welfare], Ersättning av staten till personer som utsatts för övergrepp eller försummelser i samhällsvården [State Compensation to People who Have Experienced Abuse or Negligence in State Social Care]. Socialutskottets betänkande 2012/13: SoU3 (2012).Google Scholar
Socialutskottet [The Swedish Parliamentary Committee on Health and Welfare], Upphävande av kravet på sterilisering för ändrad könstillhörighet [The Abolition of the Sterilisation Precondition for Legal Gender Recognition]. Socialutskottets betänkande 2012/13:SoU24 (2013).Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1934:103, Kunglig Majestäts proposition med förslag till lag om sterilisering av vissa sinnessjuka, sinnesslöa eller andra som lida av rubbad själsverksamhet [Royal Bill with Proposal of Act on Sterilisation of Certain People who are Insane, Feebleminded or Suffering from Other Mental Disorders].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1941:13, Kunglig Majestäts proposition med förslag till lag om sterilisering m.m. [Royal Bill with Proposal of Sterilisation Act etc.]Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1944:14, Kunglig Majestäts proposition med förslag till lag om kastrering, m.m. [Royal Bill with Proposal of Castration Act, etc.].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1951:165, Kunglig Majestäts proposition angående godkännande av Sveriges anslutning till Europarådets konvention angående skydd för de mänskliga rättigheterna och de grundläggande friheterna [Royal Bill concerning the Approval of Sweden Joining the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1966:33, Kunglig Majestäts proposition om förklaring enligt artikel 46 i Europarådets konvention angående skydd för de mänskliga rättigheterna och de grundläggande friheterna [Royal Bill on Declaration According to Article 46 in the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1971:30, Kunglig Majestäts proposition med förslag till lag om allmänna förvaltningsdomstolar, m.m. [Royal Bill with Proposal of Act on Administrative Courts, etc.].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1972:5, Kunglig Majestäts proposition med förslag till skadeståndslag m.m. [Royal Bill with Proposal of Liability Act etc].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1972:6, Kunglig Majestäts proposition med förslag till lag om fastställande av könstillhörighet i vissa fall [Royal Bill with Proposal of Act on Legal Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1973:90, Kunglig Majestäts propsition med förslag till ny regeringsform och ny riksdagsordning m.m. [Royal Bill with Proposal of a New Government Act and a New Parliament Act etc].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1974 :70, Kunglig Majestäts proposition med förslag till abortlag, m.m. [Royal Bill with Proposal of Abortion Act etc].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1975 :18, Förslag till steriliseringslag, m.m. [Proposal of Sterilisation Law, etc.].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1978/79:175, Förslag till lag om jämställdhet mellan män och kvinnor i arbetslivet, m.m. [Proposal of Act on Equality between Men and Women in Working Life, etc].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1978/79:195, Förstärkt skydd för fri- och rättigheter m.m. [Reinforced Protection for Freedoms and Rights etc].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1992/93:197, Ändring i lagen om fastställande av könstillhörighet i vissa fall, m.m. [Amendment of the Act on Legal Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances etc].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 1998/99:71, Ersättning av staten till steriliserade i vissa fall [Compensation by the State to Sterilised People under Certain Circumstances].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 2009/10:80, En reformerad grundlag [A Reformed Constitution].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 2011/12:142, Ändrad könstillhörighet [Legal Gender Recognition].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 2011/12:160, Ersättning av staten till personer som utsatts för övergrepp eller försummelser i samhällsvården [State Compensation to People who Have Experienced Abuse and Negligence in State Social Care].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 2012/13:107, Upphörande av kravet på sterilisering för ändrad könstillhörighet [Abolition of the Requirement of Sterilisation for Gender Recognition].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 2017/18:7, Skadestånd och Europakonventionen [Damages and the European Convention].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill Prop. 2017/18:64, Statlig ersättning till personer som har fått ändrad könstillhörighet fastställd i vissa fall [State Compensation to People who Have Obtained Legal Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances].Google Scholar
Swedish Government Letter, Redogörelse för steriliseringsfrågan i Sverige åren 1935–1975 och regeringens åtgärder [Report on the Sterilisation Issue in Sweden 1935–1975 and the Measures Taken by the Government]. Skr. 2000/01:73.Google Scholar
Aas, Ingeborg, Hvordan kan samfundet beskytte sig mot åndssvake og sedelighetsforbrytere [How Society Can Protect Itself against Feebleminded People and Morality Offenders]. Olaf Norlis forlag (1932).Google Scholar
Aasen, Henriette S, Rasehygiene og menneskeverd: Nasjonalsosialismens steriliseringslov av 23. juli 1942 [Racial Hygiene and Human Dignity: The National Socialist Sterilisation Act of 23 July 1942]. Kvinnerettslige studier, Institutt for offentlig rett [Studies in Women’s Law, Institute for Public Law] (1989).Google Scholar
Ahlander, Johan, ‘Sweden to Offer Compensation for Transgender Sterilizations’. Reuters, www.reuters.com/article/us-sweden-transgender-sterilisation-idUSKBN16Y1XA (27 March 2017).Google Scholar
Åhman, Karin, Grundläggande rättigheter och juridisk metod [Fundamental Rights and Legal Method]. Norstedts juridik (2015).Google Scholar
Åhman, Karin, ‘2 kap. RF, Europakonventionen och EU:s stadga om grundläggande rättigheter – en jämförelse [The Second Chapter of the Swedish Government Act, the European Convention and the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights – A Comparison]’. In Stefan Strömberg, Charlotte Kugelberg, Petter Asp, Anders Eka, Flodgren, Boel & Mellqvist, Mikael (eds), Svensk Juristtidning 100 år [Svensk Juristtidning 100 Years Anniversary]. Iustus (2016), 460–478.Google Scholar
Akre, Stein, ‘Transpersoner tvunget til sterilisering [Trans People Forced into Sterilisation]’. TV2, www.tv2.no/a/3972687 (24 January 2013).Google Scholar
Alaattinoğlu, Daniela, Svar på förslag till lag om ersättning till personer som har fått ändrad könstillhörighet fastställd i vissa fall [Answer to Proposal for Act on Compensation to People Who Have Obtained Legal Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances]. Doc. No. S2017/01918/FS, Statement to the Swedish Government (2017).Google Scholar
Alaattinoğlu, Daniela, ‘Forced Sterilisation in the Istanbul Convention: Remedies, Intersectional Discrimination and Cis-Exclusiveness’. In Niemi, Johanna, Peroni, Lourdes & Stoyanova, Vladislava (eds), International Law and Violence against Women: Europe and the Istanbul Convention. Routledge (2020), 173–188.Google Scholar
Alaattinoğlu, Daniela, ‘Ersättning och gottgörelse för kastrering och sterilisering av transpersoner i Sverige och Norge [Compensation and Remedies for Castration and Sterilisation of Trans People in Sweden and Norway]’. In Hellum, Anne & Sørlie, Anniken (eds), Frihet, likhet og mangfold [Freedom, Equality and Diversity]. Gyldendal (2021), 146–178.Google Scholar
Alaattinoğlu, Daniela & Rubio-Marín, Ruth, ‘Redress for Involuntarily Sterilised Trans People in Sweden against Evolving Human Rights Standards: A Critical Appraisal’. Human Rights Law Review vol. 19 no. 4 (2019), 705–732.Google Scholar
Alaattinoğlu, Daniela & Sørlie, Anniken, ‘Sverige gir steriliserte transpersoner erstatning. Det bør Norge også gjøre [Sweden Pays Compensation to Sterilised Trans People. Norway Should Do the Same]’. Aftenposten, www.aftenposten.no/meninger/kronikk/i/naMMWx/sverige-gir-steriliserte-transpersoner-erstatning-det-boer-norge-ogsaa (6 June 2019).Google Scholar
Alanko, Antti & Achté, Kalle, ‘Transsexualism’. Psychiatrica Fennica (1971), 343–358.Google Scholar
Alm, Erika, “Ett emballage för inälvor och emotioner”: föreställningar om kroppen i statliga utredningar från 1960- och 1970-talen [“A Wrapping for Innards and Emotions”: Ideas about the Body in State Investigations from the 1960s and 1970s]. University of Gothenburg, PhD thesis (2006).Google Scholar
Alvheim & Hansen Advokatfirma, Stevning til Oslo Tingrett [Lawsuit before Oslo Court of First Instance] (2017).Google Scholar
Ambos, Kai, Treatise on International Criminal Law. Volume II: The Crimes and Sentencing. Oxford University Press (2014).Google Scholar
Amnesty International, The State Decides Who I Am. Amnesty International Publications (2014).Google Scholar
Amnesty International, A Breakthrough for Transgender People’s Rights in Norway: John Jeanette’s Journey, www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2015/04/a-breakthrough-for-transgender-peoples-rights-in-norway-john-jeanettes-journey/ (13 April 2015).Google Scholar
Amnesty International, Czech Republic: Hard Won Justice for Women Survivors of Unlawful Sterilization, www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2021/07/czech-republic-hard-won-justice-for-women-survivors-of-unlawful-sterilization/ (22 July 2021).Google Scholar
Amnesty International Norway, Tvinges til sterilisering [Forced to Get Sterilised], www.amnesty.no/aktuelt/flere-nyheter/tvinges-til-sterilisering (25 May 2012).Google Scholar
Amnesty International Norway, Støtteskriv fra Amnesty International til Oslo tingrett i sak 17-132417TVI-OTIR/08 [Amicus Curiae from Amnesty International to Oslo Court of First Instance in the Matter 17-132417TVI-OTIR/08]. Letter to the court (2018).Google Scholar
Andenæs, Mads & Bjørge, Eirik, Menneskerettene og oss [Human Rights and Us]. Universitetsforlaget (2012).Google Scholar
Andersen, Ellen A, Out of the Closets and into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation. The University of Michigan Press (2005).Google Scholar
Anderson, David, Histories of the Hanged: The Dirty War in Kenya and the End of Empire. Weidenfeld & Nicholson (2005).Google Scholar
Andersson, Olov, En sammanställning av debatten i Dagens Nyheter augusti–oktober 1997 om steriliseringspolitiken i Sverige 1935–1976 [A Compilation of the Debate in Dagens Nyheter August–October 1997 about the Sterilisation Policies in Sweden 1935–1976]. FUB Publications (1997).Google Scholar
Andersson, Olov, Några trådar i FUB-väven. Om Riksförbundet för utvecklingsstörda barn, ungdomar och vuxna, FUB, från tidigt 1950-tal till 1980-tal [Some Threads in the FUB Fabric. On the Swedish National Association for Persons with Intellectual Disability, FUB, From the Early 1950s to the 1980s]. FUB Publications (2002).Google Scholar
Andresen, Astri & Elvbakken, Kari T, ‘Fødselskontroll, barnehelse og kvinners rettigheter og plikter [Birth Control, Children’s Health and Women’s Rights and Duties]’. Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning vol. 42 no. 1–2 (2018), 67–84.Google Scholar
Anttila, Inkeri, Loukatun suostumus oikeudenvastaisuuden poistavana perusteena [The Consent of the Injured Party as a Legally Justifying Ground]. Suomalainen Lakimiesyhdistys A No. 26 (1946).Google Scholar
Arvidsson, Malin, Att ersätta det oersättliga: statlig gottgörelse för ofrivillig sterilisering och vanvård av omhändertagna barn [Compensation of Irretrievable Matters: State Redress for Involuntary Sterilisation and Abuse in Out-of-Home Care for Children]. Örebro Studies in History 18, Bokpro (2016).Google Scholar
Aultman, B, ‘Cisgender’. Transgender Studies Quarterly vol. 1 no. 1–2 (2014), 61–62.Google Scholar
Axelsson, Majgull, Den sterila debatten: handikapp, steriliseringar, välfärd [The Sterile Debate: Handicap, Sterilisations, Welfare]. Thélème (1997).Google Scholar
Barclay, Scott, Jones, Lynn C & Marshall, Anna-Maria, ‘Two Spinning Wheels: Studying Law and Social Movements’. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society no. 54 (2011), 1–16.Google Scholar
Barkan, Steven E, ‘Legal Control of the Southern Civil Rights Movement’. American Sociological Review vol. 49 no. 4 (1984), 552–565.Google Scholar
Barow, Thomas, Kein Platz im Volksheim? Die ‘Schwachsinnigenfürsorge’ in Schweden 1916–1945 [No Place in the People’s Home? The ‘Care of the Feebleminded’ in Sweden 1916–1945]. Verlag Julius Klinkhardt (2009).Google Scholar
Bastrup, Olav RE & Sivertsen, Aage G, En landevei mot undergangen: utryddelsen av taterkulturen i Norge [A Road towards Destruction: The Extermination of Tatere Culture in Norway]. Universitetsforlaget (1996).Google Scholar
Bell, Derrick A, ‘Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest-Convergence Dilemma’. Harvard Law Review vol. 93 no. 3 (1980), 518–533.Google Scholar
Bender, Leslie, ‘Changing the Values in Tort Law’. Tulsa Law Review vol. 25 no. 4 (1990), 759–773.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, Bertil, Det allmännas ansvar enligt skadeståndslagen [Public Liability According to the Liability Act]. Nordstedts Juridik (1996).Google Scholar
Bengtsson, Bertil, ‘Om ex gratia-ersättning [On Compensation Ex Gratia]’. Svensk juristtidning no. 3 (2009), 325–339.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, Bertil, ‘Barnkonventionen och rättighetstänkandet [The Child Convention and Rights Thinking]’. Advokaten vol. 82 no. 8 (2016), 44–46.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Harry, The Transsexual Phenomenon. The Julian Press (1966).Google Scholar
Benjamin, Harry, ‘Transvestism and Transsexualism in the Male and Female’. The Journal of Sex Research vol. 3 no. 2 (1967), 107–127.Google Scholar
Bindreiter, Uta, Lagprövningsdebatten 1955–1966: i skärningsfältet mellan juridik och politik [The Debate on Judicial Review 1955–1966: In the Intersection of Law and Politics]. Juristförlaget i Lund (2009).Google Scholar
Björkman, Maria, Den anfrätta stammen: Nils von Hofsten, eugeniken och steriliseringarna 1909–63 [The Corroded Breed: Nils von Hofsten, Eugenics and the Sterilisations 1909–63]. Arkiv (2011).Google Scholar
Black, Edwin, War against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race. Dialog Press (2012).Google Scholar
Bock, Gisela, ‘Racism and Sexism in Nazi Germany: Motherhood, Compulsory Sterilization, and the State’. Signs vol. 8 no. 3 (1983), 400–421.Google Scholar
Bock, Gisela, ‘Antinatalism, Maternity and Paternity in National Socialist Racism’. In Bock, Gisela & Thane, Pat (eds) Maternity and Gender Policies: Women and the Rise of the European Welfare States, 1880s–1950s. Routledge (1991), 233–255.Google Scholar
Borgström, CA, Tillämpningen av lagen om sterilisering i Finland [Implementation of the Sterilisation Act in Finland]. Bidrag till kännedom av Finlands natur och folk (1958).Google Scholar
Bosi, Lorenzo, ‘Incorporation and Democratization: The Long-term Process of Institutionalization of the Northern Ireland Civil Rights Movement’. In Bosi, Lorenzo, Giugni, Marco & Uba, Katrin (eds), The Consequences of Social Movements. Cambridge University Press (2016), 338–360.Google Scholar
Bourke, Joanna, Rape: A History from 1860 to the Present. Virago (2007).Google Scholar
Braun, Kathrin; Herrmann, Svea L & Brekke, Ole A, ‘Sterilization Policies, Moral Rehabilitation and the Politics of Amends’. Critical Policy Studies, vol. 8 no. 2 (2014), 203–226.Google Scholar
Bremer, Johan, Asexualization: A Follow-up Study of 244 Cases. Oslo University Press (1958).Google Scholar
Bremer, Signe, Kroppslinjer: kön, transsexualism och kropp i berättelser om könskorrigering [Body Lines: Sex, Transsexualism and Body in Stories about Gender Reassignment]. Makadam (2011).Google Scholar
Bremer, Pirkkoliisa, Mikä on Trasek, mikä on transseksuaali [What is Trasek, What is Transsexual]. Seta Publications (1991).Google Scholar
Brigham, John, ‘Right, Rage, and Remedy: Forms of Law in Political Discourse’. Studies in American Political Development vol. 2 (1988), 303–316.Google Scholar
Broch, Lars O, ‘”Strict” or “Liberal” Interpretation? Comments on Norway’. In Smith, Eivind (ed), The Constitution as an Instrument of Change. SNS Forlag (2003), 242–249.Google Scholar
Broberg, Gunnar & Roll-Hansen, Nils (eds), Eugenics and the Welfare State: Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. Michigan State University Press (2005).Google Scholar
Broberg, Gunnar & Tydén, Mattias, Oönskade i folkhemmet [Unwanted in the People’s Home]. Gidlunds (1991).Google Scholar
Broberg, Gunnar & Tydén, Mattias, ‘När svensk historia blev en världsnyhet: steriliseringspolitiken och medierna [When Swedish History Became World News: The Sterilisation Politics and the Media]’. Tvärsnitt vol. 20 no. 3 (1998), 2–15.Google Scholar
Broberg, Gunnar & Tydén, Mattias, ‘Eugenics in Sweden: Efficient Care’. In Broberg, Gunnar & Roll-Hansen, Nils (eds), Eugenics and the Welfare State: Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. Michigan State University Press (2005), 77–149.Google Scholar
Bruzelius, Karin M, ‘Hvor stor betydning har Strasbourg for norsk rett? [How Important Is Strasbourg for Norwegian Law?]’. Rett På Sak: Aktualitetsmagasin for Domstolene no. 4 (2008), 30–32.Google Scholar
Bukowska-Jakobsson, Monica; Edbom, Tobias; Fried, Ingegärd; Rydelius, Per-Anders & Henriksson, Christer, ‘En kartläggning [A Mapping Exercise]’. In Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Steriliseringsfrågan i Sverige [The Sterilisation Issue in Sweden]. SOU 2000:20 (2000), 147–278.Google Scholar
Burman, Kerstin & RFSL, Ansökan om skadestånd för tvångssterilisering [Application for Compensation for Forced Sterilisation], www.rfsl.se/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/JK_ansokan.pdf (2013).Google Scholar
Butler, Judith, Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? Verso Books (2016).Google Scholar
Cáceres, Carlos, Cueto, Marcos & Palomino, Nancy, ‘Sexual and Reproductive Rights Policies in Peru: Unveiling False Paradoxes’. In Parker, Richard, Petchesky, Rosalind & Sember, Robert (eds), SexPolitics: Reports from the Front Lines. Sexuality Policy Watch (2007), 127–166.Google Scholar
Cahn, Claude, Human Rights, State Sovereignty and Medical Ethics. Examining Struggles Around Coercive Sterilisation of Romani Women. Brill (2014).Google Scholar
Cameron, Iain, ‘Normkonflikter och EKMR [Norm Conflicts and the ECHR]’. Svensk juristtidning no. 9 (2007), 851–861.Google Scholar
Case, Mary Anne, ‘Perfectionism and Fundamentalism in the Application of German Abortion Laws’. In Williams, Susan H (ed), Constituting Equality: Gender Equality and Comparative Constitutional Law. Cambridge University Press (2009), 93–106.Google Scholar
Center for Reproductive Rights, Reproductive Rights in the Inter-American System for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. Center for Reproductive Rights Publications (2002).Google Scholar
Center for Reproductive Rights; Poradna pre obcianske a l’udské práva [Centre for Civil and Human Rights] & Zoon, Ina, Body and Soul: Forced Sterilization and Other Assaults on Roma Reproductive Freedom in Slovakia. Center for Reproductive Rights Publications (2003).Google Scholar
Chabanet, Didier & Royall, Frédéric, ‘From Social Movement Analysis to Contentious Politics’. In Chabanet, Didier & Royall, Frédéric (eds), From Silence to Protest: International Perspectives on Weakly Resourced Groups. Ashgate (2014), 1–18.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, Hilary, ‘Human Rights as Men’s Rights’. In Peters, Julie & Wolper, Andrea (eds), Women’s Rights, Human Rights: International Feminist Perspectives. Routledge (1995), 103–113.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, Hilary, ‘Feminist Methods in International Law’. Studies in Transnational Legal Policy vol. 36 (2004), 159–184.Google Scholar
Christie, Nils, ‘The Ideal Victim’. In Fattah, Ezzat A (ed), From Crime Policy to Victim Policy. Palgrave Macmillan (1986), 17–30.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J, ‘Pragmatic Resistance, Law, and Social Movements in Authoritarian States: The Case of Gay Collective Action in Singapore’. Law & Society Review vol. 46 no. 4 (2012), 713–748.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J, The Politics of Rights and Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press (2022).Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J & Engel, David M, ‘Legal Consciousness’. In Mariana Valverde, Kamari Clarke, Darian-Smith, Eve & Kotiswaran, Prabha (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Law and Society. Routledge (2021), 187–191.Google Scholar
Cohen, Adam, Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck. Penguin Press (2016).Google Scholar
Crawford, James, State Responsibility: The General Part. Cambridge University Press (2013).Google Scholar
Curran, Siobhan, ‘Intersectionality and Human Rights Law: An Examination of the Coercive Sterilisations of Romani Women’. The Equal Rights Review vol. 16 (2016), 132–159.Google Scholar
Curry, Lynne, The Human Body on Trial: A Sourcebook with Cases, Laws, and Documents. Hackett Publishing (2002).Google Scholar
Dagens Nyheter, P-pillret firar 50 år [The Pill Celebrates 50 Years], www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/p-pillret-firar-50-ar/ (9 May 2010).Google Scholar
Dagens Nyheter, Kastrering testas på pedofiler [Castration Is Tested on Pedophiles], www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/kastrering-testas-pa-pedofiler/ (3 August 2016).Google Scholar
Dahlgren, Peter, ‘Steril [Infertile]’. Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå (22 August 1986).Google Scholar
Dambrofsky, Gwen, ‘Alberta Woman who Successfully Sued Province for Wrongful Sterilization Dies’. Global News, globalnews.ca/news/2580660/alberta-woman-who-successfully-sued-province-for-wrongful-sterilization-dies/ (16 March 2016).Google Scholar
De Búrca, Gráinne, Reframing Human Rights in a Turbulent Era. Oxford University Press (2021).Google Scholar
De Fazio, Gianluca, ‘Legal Opportunity Structure and Social Movement Strategy in Northern Ireland and Southern United States’. International Journal of Comparative Sociology vol. 53 no. 1 (2012), 3–22.Google Scholar
De Los Reyes, Paulina, Ett olösligt problem. Rapport om steriliseringslagarnas konsekvenser för romer och resande [An Unsolvable Problem. Report concerning the Consequences of the Sterilisation Laws for Romani and Travelling People]. A2012/1901/DISK (2012).Google Scholar
De Los Reyes, Paulina, Romsk och resandetillhörighet i ansökningar om sterilisering i mitten av 1940-talet [Romani and Travelling Association in Applications about Sterilisation in the Middle of the 1940s]. A2013/1174/DISK (2013).Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella, ‘In-depth Interviews’. In della Porta, Donatella (ed), Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research. Oxford University Press (2014), 228–261.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella, ‘Democracy in Social Movements’. In Della Porta, Donatella & Diani, Mario (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements. Oxford University Press (2015), 767–780.Google Scholar
Demus, Justicia de Género. Esterilización Forzada en el Perú: Delito de lesa Humanidad. [Gender Justice. Forced Sterilisation in Peru: Crime against Humanity]. Demus (2008).Google Scholar
Demus, Caso Esterilizaciones Forcadas [The Case of Forced Sterilisations], www.demus.org.pe/casos-emblematicos/caso-esterilizaciones-forzadas/ (8 May 2015).Google Scholar
Den Norske Helsingforskomite [The Norwegian Helsinki Committee], Norsk romani-/taterpolitikk: fortid, nåtid, fremtid [Norwegian Romani/Tater Policy: Past, Present, Future]. NHC Publications (2009).Google Scholar
Derlén, Mattias & Lindholm, Johan, ‘Judiciell aktivism eller prejudikatbildning? En empirisk granskning av Högsta domstolen [Judicial Activism or Setting Precedents? An Empirical Examination of the Supreme Court]’. Svensk juristtidning no. 2 (2016), 143–159.Google Scholar
Desmet, Ellen, ‘Methodologies to Study Human Rights Law as an Integrated Whole from a Users’ Perspective: Lessons Learnt’. In Brems, Eva & Ouald-Chaib, Saïla (eds), Fragmentation and Integration in Human Rights Law: Users’ Perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing (2018), 12–38.Google Scholar
Dittrich, Boris O, ‘Sweden: Letter to the Prime Minister Regarding Transgender Law’. Human Rights Watch, www.hrw.org/news/2012/01/14/sweden-letter-prime-minister-regarding-transgender-law (14 January 2012).Google Scholar
Drake, MJ; Mills, IW & Cranston, D, ‘On the Chequered History of Vasectomy’. BJU International vol. 84 no. 4 (1999), 475–481.Google Scholar
D’Souza, Radha, What's Wrong with Rights? Social Movements, Law and Liberal Imaginations. Pluto Books (2018).Google Scholar
Dunne, Peter, ‘Transgender Sterilisation Requirements in Europe’. Medical Law Review vol. 25 no. 4 (2017), 554–581.Google Scholar
Durbach, Andrea, ‘“The Cost of a Wounded Society”: Reparations and the Illusion of Reconciliation’. Australian Indigenous Law Review vol. 12 no. 1 (2008), 22–40.Google Scholar
Edenheim, Sara, Begärets lagar: moderna statliga utredningar och heteronormativitetens genealogi [The Laws of Desire: Modern State Investigations and the Genealogy of Heteronormativity]. Brutus Östlings förlag (2005).Google Scholar
Edwards, Alice, ‘The “Feminizing” of Torture under International Human Rights Law’. Leiden Journal of International Law vol. 19 no. 2 (2006), 349–391.Google Scholar
Edwards, Tim, Cultures of Masculinity. Routledge (2006).Google Scholar
Ehrenfreund, Norbert, The Nuremberg Legacy: How the Nazi War Crimes Changed the Course of History. Palgrave Macmillan (2007).Google Scholar
Eivergård, Mikael & Jönsson, Lars-Eric, ‘Mellan tvång och frivillighet i 1,074 steriliseringsakter 1935–1975 [Between Coercion and Free Will in 1,074 Sterilisation Files 1935–1975]’. In Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Steriliseringsfrågan i Sverige [The Sterilisation Issue in Sweden]. SOU 2000:20 (2000), 59–130.Google Scholar
Elkins, Caroline, Imperial Reckoning: The Untold Story of Britain’s Gulag in Kenya. Jonathan Cape (2005).Google Scholar
Elmgren, Ainur, ‘The Nazi’s Cloven Hoof: Finnish Critiques of Legal Sterilisation’. In Kananen, Johannes, Bergenheim, Sophy & Wessel, Merle (eds), Conceptualising Public Health: Historical and Contemporary Struggles over Key Concepts. Routledge (2018), 46–60.Google Scholar
Engesbak, Reidar, ‘Gikk til sak mot staten og vant pris under Norges første Trans Pride [Went to Court Against the State and won an Award during Norway's first Trans Pride]’. Blikk, blikk.no/aleksander-sorlie-esben-esther-pirelli-benestad-luca-dalen-espseth/gikk-til-sak-mot-staten-og-vant-pris-under-norges-forste-trans-pride/206107 (5 September 2021).Google Scholar
Engs, Ruth Clifford, The Eugenics Movement: An Encyclopedia. Greenwood Press (2005).Google Scholar
Engwall, Kristina, “Asociala och imbecilla”: Kvinnorna på Västra Mark 1931–1967 [“Asocial and Imbecile”: The Women at Västra Mark 1931–1967]. Örebro University, PhD thesis (2000).Google Scholar
Ericsson, Kjersti, Drift og dyd: Kontrollen av jenter på femtitallet [Drive and Virtue: The Control of Girls in the 1950s]. Pax (1997).Google Scholar
Eriksson, Lars D (ed), Pakkoauttajat [Helpers by Force]. Tammi (1967).Google Scholar
Eriksson, Panda, TransFinland: The Birth of Trans Studies as a Scholarly Field and the Parallel Development of Trans Activism in a Finnish Context. Unpublished research paper (2017).Google Scholar
Erkkilä, Sven, ‘Miksi steriloimislain täytäntöönpano kastraatiota koskevalta osalta on meillä epäonnistunut? [Why Has Our Implementation of the Sterilisation Act concerning Castration Failed?]’. Vankeinhoito no. 4–5 (1948), 74–79.Google Scholar
Erman, Anna, ‘Skadestånd och Europakonventionen – betänkande av Utredningen om det allmännas ansvar enligt Europakonventionen [Damages and the European Convention – Report of the Investigation on Public Liability according to the European Convention]’. Svensk juristtidning no. 2 (2011), 189–201.Google Scholar
Ewig, Christina, ‘Hijacking Global Feminism: Feminists, the Catholic Church, and the Family Planning Debacle in Peru’. Feminist Studies vol. 32 no. 3 (2006), 632–659.Google Scholar
Ewig, Christina, Second-Wave Neoliberalism: Gender, Race and Health Sector Reform in Peru. Pennsylvania State University Press (2010).Google Scholar
Fodstad, Hjørdis, Møter mellom tatere og det norska samfunnet: Erfaringer fra tvangssterilisering [Meetings between Tatere and Norwegian Society: Experiences of Forced Sterilisation]. Oslo University, Institute for Criminology, K-series No. 2-99 (1999).Google Scholar
Fodstad, Hjørdis, ‘Erfaringen fra tvanssterilisering og andre tap [Experiences of Forced Sterilisation and Other Harm]’. In Hvinden, Bjørn (ed), Romanifolket og det norske samfunnet [The Romani People and Norwegian Society]. Fagbokforlaget (2000), 130–159.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality. Volume One: An Introduction. Vintage Books (1990).Google Scholar
FPES, Remissyttrande över Förslag till lag om ersättning till personer som har fått ändrad könstillhörighet fastställd i vissa fall [Comment on Proposal for Act on Compensation to People Who Have Obtained Legal Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances]. Report no. S2017/01918/FS (2017).Google Scholar
Frankenberg, Günter, ‘Critical Comparisons: Re-thinking Comparative Law’. Harvard International Law Journal vol. 26 no. 2 (1985), 411–455.Google Scholar
Freyhofer, Horst H, The Nuremberg Medical Trial. Peter Lang Publishing (2005).Google Scholar
FRI, Rettferdighet og oppreisning til transpersoner! [Justice and Redress for Trans People!], www.foreningenfri.no/rettferdighet-og-oppreisning-til-transpersoner/ (23 June 2020).Google Scholar
FTPN, Kommentarer fra Foreningen for Transpersoner i Norge (FTP-N) til rapporten ‘Behandlingstilbudet til transseksuelle og transpersoner i Norge’ [Comments from the Norwegian Association of Trans People (FTP-N) to the Report ‘Treatments Offered to Transsexuals and Trans People in Norway’]. Letter to the Norwegian Directorate of Health (2011).Google Scholar
Gallen, James, ‘Redressing Gendered Mistreatment: Madgalene Laundries, Symphysiotomy and Mother and Baby Homes’. In Black, Lyndsey & Dunne, Peter (eds), Law and Gender in Modern Ireland: Critique and Reform. Hart (2019), 263–280.Google Scholar
Gallen, James & Gleeson, Kate, ‘Unpaid Wages: The Experiences of Irish Magdalene Laundries and Indigenous Australians’. International Journal of Law in Context vol. 14 no. 1 (2018), 43–60.Google Scholar
Galton, Francis, Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development. Macmillian (1883).Google Scholar
Ghooi, Ravindra B, ‘The Nuremberg Code – A Critique’. Perspectives in Clinical Research vol. 2 no. 2 (2011), 72–76.Google Scholar
Giles, Geoffrey J, ‘”The Most Unkindest Cut of All”: Castration, Homosexuality and Nazi Justice’. Journal of Contemporary History vol. 27 no. 1 (1992), 41–61.Google Scholar
Glass, Jess, ‘Finnish Government Opts to Keep Law that Requires Trans People to Be Sterilised’. Pink News, www.pinknews.co.uk/2017/08/25/finnish-government-opts-to-keep-law-that-requires-trans-people-to-be-sterilised/ (25 August 2017).Google Scholar
Golder, Ben, Foucault and the Politics of Rights. Stanford University Press (2015).Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen J, The Mismeasure of Man. Norton (1996).Google Scholar
Grau, Günter, Hidden Holocaust? Gay and Lesbian Persecution in Germany, 1933–45. Taylor & Francis (1995).Google Scholar
Greer, Steven & Wildhaber, Luzius, ‘Revising the Debate about “Constitutionalising” the European Court of Human Rights’. Human Rights Law Review vol. 12 no. 4 (2012), 655–87.Google Scholar
Grey, Rosemary, ‘The ICC’s First “Forced Pregnancy” Case in Historical Perspective’. Journal of International Criminal Justice vol. 15 no. 5 (2017), 905–930.Google Scholar
Gribble, James N, Sharma, Suneeta & Menotti, Elaine, ‘Family Planning Policies and their Impact on the Poor: Peru’s Experience’. International Family Planning Perspectives vol. 33 no. 4 (2007), 176–181.Google Scholar
Grunewald, Karl, ‘Graviditet och sterilisering hos svenska särskoleflickor under åren 1937–1956 [Pregnancy and Sterilisation among Swedish Girls in Special Schools during the Years 1937–1956]’. Psykisk utvecklingshämning vol. 64 no. 1–2 (1962), 3–13.Google Scholar
Grunewald, Karl, ‘Indikationerna för sterilisering av psykiskt utvecklingsstörda måste omvärderas [The Indications for Sterilisation of Mentally Retarded Must Be Re-evaluated]’. Svenska läkartidningen vol. 67 no. 44 (1970a), 5096–5102.Google Scholar
Grunewald, Karl, ‘Kritisk granskning av ansökningar om sterilisering av mentalt defekta [Critical Examination of Applications for Sterilisation by the Mentally Defective]’. Svenska läkartidningen vol. 67 no. 44 (1970b), 5091–5095.Google Scholar
Grünn, Emma, ‘Sukupuolensa korjannut translain pakkosterilisaatiosta: “Se on nyt viety minulta” [A Person Who Has Undergone Gender Reassignment Comments on the Forced Sterilisation in the Trans Act: “It Has Now Been Taken Away from Me”]’. YLE, yle.fi/uutiset/3-9698573 (30 June 2017).Google Scholar
Haave, Per, Sterilisering av tatere 1934–1977: en historisk undersøkelse av lov og praksis [Sterilisation of Tatere 1934–1977: A Historical Investigation of Legislation and Practice]. The Research Council of Norway (2000a).Google Scholar
Haave, Per, ‘Sterilisering av tatere – kirurgi på “rasemessig” grunnlag? [Sterilisation of Tatere – Surgery on “Racial” Grounds?]’. In Hvinden, Bjørn (ed), Romanifolket og det norske samfunnet [The Romani People and Norwegian Society]. Fagbokforlaget (2000b), 32–73.Google Scholar
Haave, Per, ‘Sterilisering under tvang og frivillighet [Sterilisation through Coercion and Free Will]’. Dagbladet (10 March 2003).Google Scholar
Haave, Per, ‘Sterilisering av kvinner vid Svanviken arbeidskoloni (1949–1970) [Sterilisation of Women at the Svanviken Work Colony]’. In Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation], Vedlegg til NOU 2015:7 [Annexes to NOU 2015:7] (2015a), 545–554.Google Scholar
Haave, Per, ‘En paragraf til besvær: Misjonens “aksjon” for å lette adgangen til tvangssterilisering av mindreårige [A Troublesome Section: The “Action” of the Mission to Facilitate the Access to Forced Sterilisation of Minors]’. In Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation], Vedlegg til NOU 2015:7 [Annexes to NOU 2015:7] (2015b), 578–590.Google Scholar
Haave, Per & Giæver, Øyvind, Sterilisering på medisinsk grunnlag og sammenhengen mellom eugenikk of humangenetikk [Sterilisation on Medical Indication and the Connection between Eugenics and Human Genetics]. The Research Council of Norway (2000).Google Scholar
Haavie, Siri, ‘Sterilization in Norway – A Dark Chapter?’. Eurozine (2003), 1–20.Google Scholar
Hagerman, Maja, Käraste Herman: Rasbiologen Herman Lundborgs gåta [Dearest Herman: The Riddle of the Race Biologist Herman Lundborg]. Norstedts (2015).Google Scholar
Hakalehto-Wainio, Suvianna, Valta ja vahinko: julkisen vallan käyttäjän vahingonkorvausvastuu vahingonkorvauslaissa [Power and Damage: The Legal Liability of the Administrator of Public Power]. Talentum (2008).Google Scholar
Hakalehto-Wainio, Suvianna, ‘Skadestånd som medel för ersättning vid kränkningar av mänskliga rättigheter [Compensation as Reparation for Human Rights Violations]’. In Mirchadani, Karin B & Ståhl, Kristina (eds), Förhandlingarna vid det 39:e nordiska juristmötet i Stockholm 18–19 augusti 2011 [Negotiations at the 39th Nordic Law Meeting in Stockholm 18–19 August 2011]. De nordiske juristmøder (2011), 237–243.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Jack, Trans*: A Quick and Quirky Account of Gender Variability. University of California Press (2018).Google Scholar
Halsos, Martin S, ‘Norway 1842–1972: When Public Interest Demands’. In Rydström, Jens & Mustola, Kati (eds), Criminally Queer: Homosexuality and Criminal Law in Scandinavia 1842–1999. Aksant Academic Publishers (2007), 91–116.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, Rune, ‘Etnisk mobilisering i en brytningstid [Ethnic Mobilisation in a Period of Transition]’. In Hvinden, Bjørn (ed), Romanifolket og det norske samfunnet [The Romani People and Norwegian Society]. Fagbokforlaget (2000), 195–226.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie, Intersectionality: An Intellectual History. Oxford University Press (2016).Google Scholar
Hansen, Bent S, ‘Something Rotten in the State of Denmark: Eugenics and the Ascent of the Welfare State’. In Broberg, Gunnar & Roll-Hansen, Nils (eds), Eugenics and the Welfare State: Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Finland. Michigan State University Press (2005), 9–76.Google Scholar
Hanson, Clare, ‘Biopolitics, Biological Racism and Eugenics’. In Morton, Stephen & Bygrave, Stephen (eds), Foucault in an Age of Terror: Essays on Biopolitics and the Defence of Society. Palgrave Macmillan (2008), 106–117.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Betsy, Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control. Haymarket Books (2016).Google Scholar
Hassenstab, Christine M, Body Law and the Body of Law: A Comparative Study of Social Norm Inclusion in Norwegian and American Laws. De Gruyter Open (2014).Google Scholar
Hägglund, Göran, ‘Dags att avskaffa kravet på sterilisering vid könsbyte [Time to Abolish the Requirement of Sterilisation Connected to Sex Change]’. Dagens Nyheter (18 February 2012).Google Scholar
HBRS, Vedrørende rapport om behandlingstilbudet til pasienter med diagnosen transseksualisme [Concerning the Report on Treatments Offered to Patients Diagnosed with Transsexualism]. Letter to the Norwegian Directorate of Health (2011).Google Scholar
Hedrén, Gunnar, ‘Några reflektioner med anledning av den vid innevarande riksdag väckta motionen om utredning rörande sterilisering av sinnesslöa m.fl. [Some Reflections on the Parliamentary Motion on Investigation concerning Sterilisation of Feebleminded etc.]’. Svenska läkartidningen vol. 19 no. 14 (1922), 273–278.Google Scholar
Heim, Nikolaus, Die Kastration und ihre Folgen bei Sexualstraftätern [Castration and Its Consequences on Sexual Criminals]. Otto Schwartz & Co (1980).Google Scholar
Hellum, Anne, ‘Making Space and Giving Voice: The CEDAW in Norwegian Law’. In Hellum, Anne & Sinding Aasen, Henriette (eds), Women's Human Rights: The CEDAW in International, Regional and National Law. Cambridge University Press (2013), 588–624.Google Scholar
Hellum, Anne, ‘Vern mot diskriminering på grunnlag av seksuell orientering, kjønnsidentitet og kjønnsuttrykk: Noen utviklingslinjer i internasjonal og norsk rett [Protection against Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Gender Expression: Some Developments in International and Norwegian Law]’. In Anne Hellum, Reidun Førde, Kjelland, Morten & Stridbeck, Ulf (eds), Cand.mag., cand.med., cand.jur., cand.alt: Festskrift til Aslak Syse 70 år [Cand.mag., cand.med., cand.jur., cand.alt: Commemoration of Aslak Syse 70 years]. Gyldendal (2016), 191–213.Google Scholar
Hellum, Anne, ‘Norwegian Equality and Anti-discrimination Reform in an Individualist and Market-oriented Context’. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research vol. 25 no. 3 (2017), 211–216.Google Scholar
Hellum, Anne, ‘Individets vern mot diskriminering på grunnlag av seksuell orientering, kjønnsidentitet og kjønnsuttrykk: Et vern på majoritetens premisser? [Individual Protection against Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Gender Expression: Protection on the Premises of the Majority?]’. In Hellum, Anne & Sørlie, Anniken (eds), Frihet, likhet og mangfold [Freedom, Equality and Diversity]. Gyldendal (2021), 306–343.Google Scholar
Herzog, Dagmar, Sexuality in Europe: A Twentieth-century History. Cambridge University Press (2011).Google Scholar
Hietala, Marjatta, ‘Suomalaisen naistyypin etsiminen [Looking for the Finnish Female Type]’. In Kemiläinen, Aira, Hietala, Marjatta & Suvanto, Pekka (eds), Mongoleja vai germaaneja? – rotuteorioiden suomalaiset [Mongols or Germanic People? – The Finns of Eugenics]. Societas Historica Finlandiae (1985), 421–446.Google Scholar
Hietala, Marjatta, ‘Pohjoismaihinkin säädettiin sterilisaatiolait vuoteen 1938 mennessä – Huoli ihmiskunnan laadusta synnytti rotuhygienian [Also the Nordic Countries Established Sterilisation Laws Until 1938 – Worry about the Quality of Humankind Gave Birth to Eugenics]’. Helsingin Sanomat (11 January 1995).Google Scholar
Hietala, Marjatta, ‘From Race Hygiene to Sterilization: The Eugenics Movement in Finland’. In Broberg, Gunnar & Roll-Hansen, Nils (eds), Eugenics and the Welfare State: Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. Michigan State University Press (2005), 195–258.Google Scholar
Higuchi, A, Takita, M, Ozaki, A, Kimura, H & Watanabe, H, ‘Forced Sterilization during Post-war Era in Japan’. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine vol. 112 no. 10 (2019), 829.Google Scholar
Hilson, Chris, ‘New Social Movements: The Role of Legal Opportunity’. Journal of European Public Policy vol. 9 no. 2 (2002), 238–255.Google Scholar
Hilson, Chris, ‘Climate Change Litigation in the UK: An Explanatory Approach (or Bringing Grievance Back In)’. In Fracchia, Fabrizio & Occhiena, Massimo (eds), Climate Change: La riposta del diritto. Editoriale Scientifica (2010), 421–436.Google Scholar
Hirdman, Yvonne, Att lägga livet tillrätta: Studier i svensk folkhemspolitik [To Put Life in Order: Studies of Swedish Policies concerning the People’s Home]. Carlssons (2000).Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran, ‘The Nordic Counternarrative: Democracy, Human Development, and Judicial Review’. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 9 no. 2 (2011), 449–469.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran, Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press (2014).Google Scholar
Hjelmeng, Erling, ‘Folkerettslig påvirkning av norsk erstatningsrett – to høyesterettsdommer [International Legal Influence on Norwegian Compensation Law – Two Supreme Court Judgments]’. Tidsskrift for erstatningsrett, forsikringsrett og trygderett vol. 1 no. 3 (2016), 211–229.Google Scholar
Holmlund, Sofia, ‘Finländska döva steriliserades – nu önskas en ursäkt av staten [Finnish Deaf People were Sterilised – Now They Ask for a State Apology]’. Hufvudstadsbladet, www.hbl.fi/artikel/finlandska-dova-steriliserades-nu-onskas-en-ursakt-av-staten/ (21 October 2018a).Google Scholar
Holmlund, Sofia, ‘Politiker börjar jobba för att steriliseringar mot döva ska erkännas [Politicians Start Working for the Recognition of the Sterilisation of Deaf People]’. Hufvudstadsbladet, www.hbl.fi/artikel/politiker-borjar-jobba-for-att-steriliseringar-mot-dova-ska-erkannas-2/ (28 October 2018b).Google Scholar
Hooks, Bell, Feminist Theory from Margin to Center. South End Press (1984).Google Scholar
Honkanen, Toini, ‘Kastroimiskysymys lainkäytön valossa [The Castration Question in the Light of Legal Implementation]’. Lakimies (1954), 41–55.Google Scholar
Honkasalo, Brynolf, ‘Finlands nya lagförslag angående sterilisering [Finland’s New Legislative Proposal on Sterilisation]’. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Strafferet vol. 23 (1935), 114–123.Google Scholar
Honkasalo, Julian, ‘When Boys Will Not Be Boys: American Eugenics and the Formation of Gender Nonconformity as Psychopathology’. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies vol. 11 no. 4 (2016), 270–286.Google Scholar
Honkasalo, Julian, ‘In the Shadow of Eugenics: Transgender Sterilisation Legislation and the Struggle for Self-determination’. In Pearce, Ruth, Moon, Igi, Gupta, Kat & Steinberg, Deborah L (eds), The Emergence of Trans: Cultures, Politics and Everyday Lives. Routledge (2019), 17–33.Google Scholar
Howe, Adrian, ‘The Problem of Privatized Injuries: Feminist Strategies for Litigation’. In Fineman, Martha A & Thomadsen, Nancy S (eds), At the Boundaries of Law: Feminism and Legal Theory. Routledge (1991), 148–167.Google Scholar
Hoyle, Lindsay, ‘V.C. v. Slovakia: A Reproductive Rights Victory Misses the Point’. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review vol. 36 no. 3 (2014), 17–31.Google Scholar
Huffington Post, Sweden’s Transgender Sterilization Law Slammed by International Activists, Politicians, www.huffpost.com/entry/sweden-transgender-sterilization-law-activists_n_1219878 (20 January 2012).Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan, ‘Rights and Social Movements: Counter-hegemonic Strategies’. Journal of Law and Society vol. 17 no. 3 (1990), 309–328.Google Scholar
Husa, Jaakko, ‘Nordic Constitutionalism and European Human Rights – Mixing Oil and Water?’. Scandinavian Studies in Law vol. 55 (2010), 101–124.Google Scholar
Husa, Jaakko, The Constitution of Finland: A Contextual Analysis. Hart Publishing (2011).Google Scholar
Hvinden, Bjørn, ‘Innledning: Fra fordømmelse til respekt og verdighet [Introduction: From Condemnation to Respect and Dignity]’. In Hvinden, Bjørn (ed), Romanifolket og det norske samfunnet [The Romani People and Norwegian Society]. Fagbokforlaget (2000a), 11–31.Google Scholar
Hvinden, Bjørn (ed), Romanifolket og det norske samfunnet [The Romani People and Norwegian Society]. Fagbokforlaget (2000b).Google Scholar
Hyde, Alan, Bodies of Law. Princeton University Press (2003).Google Scholar
ICJ-Norge, Prosesskriv til Borgarting lagmannsrett i sak 18-190131ASD-BORG/02 [Amicus Curiae to Borgarting Court of Appeal in Case 18-190131ASD-BORG/02]. Letter to the court (2020).Google Scholar
Independent, Following in Malta’s Footsteps, Norway Extends Gender Identity Laws to Children, www.independent.com.mt/articles/2016-09-28/world-news/Following-in-Malta-s-footsteps-Norway-extends-gender-identity-laws-to-children-6736164367 (28 September 2016).Google Scholar
International Commission of Jurists, Yogyakarta Principles – Principles on the Application of International Human Rights Law in Relation to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. International Commission of Jurists Publications (2007).Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Maria H, Prosesskrift til Oslo tingrett [Written Pleadings before the Oslo Court of First Instance]. Case No. 17-132417TVI-OTIR/08. Unpublished (2018).Google Scholar
Johnston, Hank, Laraña, Enrique & Gusfield, Joseph R, ‘Identities, Grievances, and New Social Movements’. In Johnston, Hank, Laraña, Enrique & Gusfield, Joseph R (eds), New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity. Temple University Press (2009), 3–35.Google Scholar
Karlsson Schaffer, Johan, ‘Mellan ambivalens och aktivism: Norden och internationella mänskliga rättigheter [Between Ambivalence and Activism: The Nordic Countries and International Human Rights]’. Retfærd – The Nordic Journal of Law and Justice vol. 40 no. 1 (2017), 55–72.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Schaffer, Johan & Langford, Malcolm, ‘The Reluctant Activists: The Nordic States and International Human Rights’. Unpublished research paper (2018).Google Scholar
Kastari, Paavo, Kansalaisvapauksien perustuslainturva [The Constitutional Protection of Civil Rights]. Suomalainen Lakimiesyhdistys (1972).Google Scholar
Kelly, Liz, Surviving Sexual Violence. Polity Press (1988).Google Scholar
Kervinen, Elina, ‘Oslolainen Noah, 20, tunsi olevansa väärässä kehossa jo viisivuotiaana – Norja vapautti translakiaan, ja Suomesta tuli ainoa sterilointia vaativa Pohjoismaa [Noah, 20 Years, from Oslo, Felt that He Was in the Wrong Body Already When He Was Five – Norway Liberalised Its Trans Act and Finland Became the Only Nordic Country Requiring Sterilisation]’. Helsingin Sanomat, www.hs.fi/ulkomaat/art-2000005222128.html (23 May 2017).Google Scholar
Kevles, Daniel, ‘Eugenics and Human Rights’. The BMJ, vol. 319 no. 7207 (1999), 435–438.Google Scholar
Kierulf, Anine, ‘Grunnloven som irrelevant rettskilde [The Constitution as an Irrelevant Legal Source]’. Lov og Rett, vol. 55 no. 3 (2016), 185–189.Google Scholar
Kimmel, Michael S, Hearn, Jeff & Connell, Robert W (eds), Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities. SAGE Publications (2004).Google Scholar
Kirves, Jenni, ‘”Sota ei ollut elämisen eikä muistamisen arvoista aikaa” – kirjailijat ja traumaattinen sota [“The War Was Neither a Time to Live, Nor a Time to Remember” – The Authors and the Traumatic War]’. In Näre, Sari & Kirves, Jenni (eds), Ruma sota: Talvi- ja jatkosodan vaiettu historia [Ugly War: The Silenced History of the Winter and Continuation War]. Johnny Kniga (2008), 381–425.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne & Ulfstein, Geir, The Constitutionalization of International Law. Oxford University Press (2009).Google Scholar
Knight, Kyle, ‘Dispatches: Norway’s Transgender Rights Transformation’. Human Rights Watch, www.hrw.org/news/2016/06/07/dispatches-norways-transgender-rights-transformation (7 June 2016).Google Scholar
Koch, Lene, ‘The Meaning of Eugenics: Reflections on the Government of Genetic Knowledge in the Past and the Present’. Science in Context vol. 17 no. 3 (2004), 315–331.Google Scholar
Kolata, Jens, ‘Exkurs: Kastration homosexueller Männer in der Nachkriegszeit [Excursion: Castration of Homosexual Men in the Post-War Period]’. Der Liebe Wegen, www.der-liebe-wegen.org/nachkriegszeit_baden-wuerttemberg_spitzenreiter_der_verfolgung/ (24 January 2017).Google Scholar
Koslerova, Anna, ‘Illegally Sterilised Czech Women to Be Offered Compensation’. The Guardian, www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/aug/04/illegally-sterilised-czech-women-to-be-offered-compensation (4 August 2021).Google Scholar
Kouvo, Sari, Making Just Rights? Mainstreaming Women’s Human Rights and a Gender Perspective. Iustus (2004).Google Scholar
Kuechenhoff, Bernhard, ‘The Psychiatrist Auguste Forel and His Attitude to Eugenics’. History of Psychiatry vol. 19 no. 2 (2008), 215–223.Google Scholar
Kühl, Stefan, The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism. Oxford University Press (2002).Google Scholar
Langford, Malcolm, Madsen, Mikael R & Karlsson Schaffer, Johan, The Scandinavian Rights Revolution: Courts, Rights and Legal Mobilization since the 1970s. Unpublished research paper (2019).Google Scholar
Lahti, Raimo, ‘Vuoden 1970 abortti-, sterilisaatio- ja kastraatiolainsäädäntö [The Abortion, Sterilisation and Castration Legislation of 1970]’. In Borgström, Johan, Hellén, Erik, Sevón, Leif & von Veh, Berndt (eds), Festskrift utgiven i anledning av Juristklubben Codex 30-års jubileum [Commemoration for the 30th Anniversary of the Lawyers’ Club Codex]. Juridiska föreningen i Finland, publikationsserie 40 (1970), 67–105.Google Scholar
Lahti, Raimo, ‘Perhesuunnittelupolitiikka ja syntyvyyden säännöstelyä koskeva lainsäädäntömme [Our Legislation on Family Planning Policies and Birth Control]’. Oikeus vol. 1 no. 1 (1972), 15–40.Google Scholar
Lahti, Raimo, ‘Uusien abortti- ja steriloimislakien vaikutus maassamme [The Effect of the New Abortion and Sterilisation Acts in Our Country]’. Suomen Lääkärilehti no. 28 (1973), 303–314.Google Scholar
Lahti, Raimo, ‘Rikosseuraamukset ja niihin verrattavat pakkotoimenpiteet: Eräiden kontrollipolitiikan kysymysten tarkastelua [Criminal Sanctions and Comparable Forced Interventions: Investigation of Some Control Policy Questions]’. In Majanen, Martti (ed), Rikosoikeudellisia kirjoitelmia IV: Reino Kalervo Ellilälle omistettu [Criminal Legal Essays IV: Dedicated to Reino Kalervo Ellilä]. Suomalainen Lakimiesyhdistys (1980), 104–122.Google Scholar
Lahti, Raimo, ‘Voluntary or Compulsory Treatment – Some Trends in Finnish Law’. In Dierkens, Raphaël (ed), Jus Medicum. Centrum voor Medisch Recht Rijksuniversiteit Gent (1982), 23–27Google Scholar
Lahti, Raimo, ‘Vuoden 1970 abortti-, steriloimis-, ja kastroimislait, niiden soveltaminen sekä abortti- ja steriloimislakien muutokset vuosina 1978 ja 1985 [The 1970 Abortion, Sterilisation and Castration Acts, Their Implementation and Amendments of the Abortion and Sterilisation Acts in 1978 and 1985]’. Suomen Lääkärilehti vol. 18 (1985), 1809–1814.Google Scholar
Lahti, Raimo, ‘Pakkohoito terveydenhuollossa [Forced Treatment in Health Care]’. Sosiaalinen aikakausikirja no. 2 (1986), 37–39.Google Scholar
Lahti, Raimo (ed), Kohti rationaalista ja humaania kriminaalipolitiikkaa [Towards a Rational and Humane Criminal Policy]. Yliopistopaino (1996).Google Scholar
Lahti, Raimo, ‘Lääkäri ja henkilökohtaiseen koskemattomuuteen puuttuminen. Lääkintäoikeuden kehityksestä eräiden sääntelyesimerkkien valossa [The Medical Doctor and Interventions into Personal Integrity. On the Development of Medical Law in the Light of Regulatory Examples]’. In Lohiniva-Kerkelä, Mirja (ed), Väkivalta. Seuraamukset ja haavoittuvuus. Terttu Utriaisen juhlakirja. [Violence. Consequences and Vulnerability. Commemoration of Terttu Utriainen]. Talentum (2006), 183–206.Google Scholar
Lahti, Raimo, ‘Ärztliche Eingriffe und das Selbstbestimmungsrecht des Individuums [Medical Interventions and Individual Autonomy]’. In Britz, Guido et al (eds), Festschrift für Heike Jung [Commemoration of Heike Jung]. Nomos (2007), 511–528.Google Scholar
Lahti, Raimo, Asiantuntijalausunto (hedelmöityshoidon kysymyksiä) [Expert Statement (Questions Regarding Fertility Treatment)]. Report to the Finnish Parliamentary Ombudsman (2008).Google Scholar
Lahti, Raimo (ed), Inkeri Anttila (1916–2013): Rikosoikeudes uudistajan ammatillinen ura ja vaikutus [Inkeri Anttila (1916–2013): The Professional Career and Impact of the Reformer of Criminal Law]. Forum Iuris (2016).Google Scholar
Lambertz, Göran, ‘Tankar om justitiekanslern [Thoughts on the Swedish Chancellor of Justice]’. In Heckscher, Sten & Eka, Anders (eds), Festskrift till Johan Hirschfeldt [Commemoration of Johan Hirschfeldt]. Iustus (2008), 203–223.Google Scholar
Laughlin, Harry H, Eugenical Sterilization in the United States. Psychopathic Laboratory of the Municipal Court of Chicago (1922).Google Scholar
Lavapuro, Juha, Scheinin, Martin & Ojanen, Tuomas, ‘Rights-based Constitutionalism in Finland and the Development of Pluralist Constitutional Review’. International Journal of Constitutional Law vol. 9 no. 2 (2011), 505–531.Google Scholar
Lee, Rebecca, ‘Forced Sterilization and Mandatory Divorce: How a Majority of Council of Europe Member States’ Laws Regarding Gender Identity Violate the Internationally and Regionally Established Human Rights of Trans* People’. Berkley Journal of International Law vol. 33 no. 1 (2015), 114–152.Google Scholar
Lee, Po-Han, ‘Struggle for Recognition: Theorising Sexual/Gender Minorities as Rights-holders in International Law’. Feminist Legal Studies vol. 30 no. 1 (2022), 73–95.Google Scholar
Le Maire, Louis, ‘Danish Experiences Regarding the Castration of Sexual Offenders’. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology vol. 47 no. 3 (1956), 294–310.Google Scholar
Lennerhed, Lena, ‘Sterilisation on Eugenic Grounds in Europe in the 1930s: News in 1997 but Why?’. Reproductive Health Matters vol. 5 no. 10 (1997), 156–161.Google Scholar
Lennerhed, Lena, ‘Steriliseringar och sexuell reform: Om Elise Ottesen-Jensen och Riksförbundet för sexuell upplysning [Sterilisations and Sexual Reform: On Elise Ottesen-Jensen and the Swedish Association for Sexual Education]’. In Broberg, Gunnar (ed), Fem uppsatser om steriliseringen i Sverige [Five Essays on Sterilisation in Sweden]. Ugglan 12, Lund Studies in the History of Science and Ideas (2000), 22–46.Google Scholar
Lennerhed, Lena, Sex i folkhemmet: RFSUs tidiga historia [Sex in the People's Home: The Early History of RFSU]. Gidlunds förlag (2002).Google Scholar
Leppälä, Heli, Vammaisuus hyvinvointivaltiossa [Disability in the Welfare State]. University of Turku, PhD thesis (2014).Google Scholar
Lied, Vilde G, ‘Vart steriliserte for å få riktig kjønn på papiret: Krev unnskyldning frå staten [Were Sterilised in Order to Get Their Real Gender on Paper: Demand Apology from the State]’. NRK, www.nrk.no/norge/vart-steriliserte-for-a-fa-riktig-kjonn-pa-papiret_-krev-unnskyldning-fra-staten-1.15068993 (1 July 2020).Google Scholar
Liljeborg, Ove, En genomgång av 1997 års tvångssteriliseringsdebatt i svensk dagspress [A Review of the 1997 Sterilisation Debate in Swedish Daily Press]. Levande historia (2009).Google Scholar
Lindberg, Marjut, ‘Outo käytös ja höllö moraali riitti sterilointiin [Unusual Behaviour and Questionable Morals Was Enough for Sterilisation]’. Helsingin Sanomat, www.hs.fi/sunnuntai/art-2000003653509.html (31 August 1997a).Google Scholar
Lindberg, Marjut, ‘Tutkijat: Pakkosterilointeja tehtiin vielä 1960-luvulla. Tilastoista löytyy noin 11000 viranomaisten päätöstä vuosilta 1935–70 [Researchers: Forced Sterilisations Were Still Carried Out in the 1960s. Statistics Demonstrate around 11,000 Authority Decisions during 1935–70]’. Helsingin Sanomat, www.hs.fi/kotimaa/art-2000003653206.html (30 August 1997b).Google Scholar
Lindberg, Marjut, ‘Suomessa pakkosteriloitiin 11000 [In Finland 11,000 Were Forcibly Sterilised]’. Helsingin Sanomat, www.hs.fi/ulkomaat/art-2000003783311.html (5 March 1999).Google Scholar
Lindekilde, Lasse, ‘Discourse and Frame Analysis’. In Della Porta, Donatella (ed), Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research. Oxford University Press (2014), 195–227.Google Scholar
Lindquist, Bosse, Förädlade svenskar [Breeded Swedes]. Alfabeta (1991).Google Scholar
Liukkonen, Marjo, Hennalan naismurhat [The Hennala Femicides]. Vastapaino (2017).Google Scholar
LLH, Angående rapportutkast “Behandlingstilbudet til transseksuelle og transpersoner i Norge” [Referring to the Draft Report ‘Treatments Offered to Transsexuals and Trans People in Norway’]. Letter to the Norwegian Directorate of Health (2011).Google Scholar
Lohne, Jenny-Linn, ‘Nye eksperter får vurdere transpersoner [New Experts Get to Evaluate Trans People]’. VG, www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/sykehus-norge/nye-eksperter-faar-vurdere-transpersoner/a/10118504/ (1 August 2013).Google Scholar
Lohne, Jenny-Linn, Falch-Olsen, Ida & Fagerheim, Ragnhild H, ‘Ingentransland [Notransland]’. VG, www.vg.no/spesial/2013/transer/ (2 July 2013).Google Scholar
Lomfors, Ingrid, ‘Berättelser från livet. Intervjuer med tvångssteriliserade i Sverige [Stories from Life. Interviews with Involuntarily Sterilised in Sweden]’. In Socialdepartementet [The Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs], Steriliseringsfrågan i Sverige [The Sterilisation Issue in Sweden]. SOU 2000:20 (2000), 279–355.Google Scholar
Lundberg, Aleksa, ‘Be om ursäkt för steriliseringarna [Apologise for the Sterilisations]’. Aftonbladet, www.aftonbladet.se/debatt/article16903339.ab (5 June 2013).Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine, ‘Rape, Genocide, and Women’s Human Rights’. Harvard Women’s Law Journal vol. 17 (1994), 5–16.Google Scholar
Marhoefer, Laurie, Among Abnormals: The Queer Sexual Politics of Germany’s Weimar Republic, 1918–1933. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, PhD thesis (2008).Google Scholar
Markowitz, Lawrence P, ‘How Master Frames Mislead: The Division and Eclipse of Nationalist Movements in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan’. Ethnic & Racial Studies vol. 32 no. 4 (2009), 716–738.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria, ‘Idle Rights: Employees’ Rights Consciousness and the Construction of Sexual Harassment Policies’. Law & Society Review vol. 39 no. 1 (2005).Google Scholar
Mattila, Markku, ‘Suomalainen rotuhygienia [Finnish Racial Hygiene]’. Tieteessä tapahtuu no. 8 (1997a), 20–26.Google Scholar
Mattila, Markku, The Main Points of the Early Finnish Eugenic Movements. Unpublished research paper (1997b).Google Scholar
Mattila, Markku, ‘Suomen ruotsinkieliset ja laadukkaamman väestön vaatimus [Finland's Swedish-speakers and the Requirement for a Higher Quality Population]’. In Härmänmaa, Marja & Mattila, Markku (eds), Uusi uljas ihminen, eli modernin pimeä puoli [The Brave New Person, Or the Dark Side of Modernity]. Atena (1998), 117–141.Google Scholar
Mattila, Markku, Kansamme parhaaksi: Rotuhygienia Suomessa vuoden 1935 sterilointilakiin asti [For the Best of Our Nation: Race Hygiene in Finland until the 1935 Sterilisation Act]. Suomen Historiallinen Seura (1999).Google Scholar
Mattila, Markku, On the History of Alegal and Coercive Sterilization: Some Legal and Ethical Perspectives. Unpublished research paper (2002).Google Scholar
Mattila, Markku, Negatiivisen eugeenisen politiikan yleiskuva [The General Picture of Negative Eugenics]. Unpublished research paper (2003).Google Scholar
Mattila, Markku, ‘Sterilointipolitiikka ja romanit Suomessa vuosina 1950–1970 [Sterilisation Politics and the Romani in Finland during 1950–1970]’. In Häkkinen, Antti, Pulma, Panu & Tervonen, Miika (eds), Vieraat kulkijat – tutut talot. Näkökulmia etnisyyden ja köyhyyden historiaan Suomessa [Unfamiliar Travellers – Familiar Houses. Perspectives on the History of Ethnicity and Poverty in Finland]. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura (2006), 402–452.Google Scholar
Mattila, Markku, ‘“Det får ej finnas dåliga svenskar i detta land!” Rasbiologi och rashygien som vetenskapliga vapen i språkstridens Finland [“There Cannot Be Bad Swedes in this Country!” Race Biology and Racial Hygiene as Scientific Weapons in the Finland of Linguistic Battle]’. In Wickström, Mats & Wolff, Charlotta (eds), Mångkulturalitet, migration och minoriteter i Finland under tre sekel [Multiculturality, Migration and Minorities in Finland During Three Centuries]. Svenska Litteratursällskapet i Finland (2016), 271–318.Google Scholar
McCammon, Holly J & McGrath, Allison R, ‘Litigating Change? Social Movements and the Court System’. Sociology Compass vol. 9 no. 2 (2015), 128–139.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael, ‘Legal Mobilization and Social Reform Movements: Notes on Theory and Its Application’. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society vol. 11 (1991), 225–254.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael, Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. The University of Chicago Press (1994).Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E, ‘Introduction: Conditions of Vulnerability’. In Goodale, Mark & Merry, Sally E (eds), The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law between the Global and the Local. Cambridge University Press (2007), 195–203.Google Scholar
Mibenge, Chiseche S, Sex and International Tribunals: The Erasure of Gender from the War Narrative. University of Pennsylvania Press (2013).Google Scholar
Modéer, Kjell Å, ‘From “Rechtsstaat” to “Welfare State”: Swedish Judicial Culture in Transition 1870–1970’. In Pue, W Wesley & Sugarman, David (eds), Lawyers and Vampires: Cultural Histories of Legal Professions. Hart Publishing (2003), 151–167.Google Scholar
Moreno, Jonathan D, ‘Reassessing the Influence of the Nuremberg Code on American Medical Ethics’. Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy vol. 13 no. 2 (1997), 347–360.Google Scholar
Mörk, Martin & Hermansson, Magnus, ‘Enskildas rättsskydd vid lagstiftarens försummelse – om estoppelargumentet i svensk rätt [The Protection of Individuals When the Legislator Is Negligent – About the Estoppel Argument in Swedish Law]’. Svensk juristtidning no. 3 (2008), 229–261.Google Scholar
Mustola, Kati, ‘Finland 1889–1999: A Turbulent Past’. In Rydström, Jens & Mustola, Kati (eds), Criminally Queer: Homosexuality and Criminal Law in Scandinavia, 1842–1999. Aksant Academic Publishers (2007), 215–250.Google Scholar
Myhre, Eivind & Thomassen, Øyvind, ‘The Construction of an Accepted Masculinity: Castration in High Security Psychiatric Institutions in Norway 1923–1945’. In Lander, Ingrid, Ravin, Signe & Jon, Nina (eds), Masculinities in the Criminological Field: Control, Vulnerability and Risk-taking. Routledge (2014), 89–109.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Alva & Myrdal, Gunnar, Kris i befolkningsfrågan [Crisis in the Population Matter]. Folkutgivning (1934).Google Scholar
Nader, Laura, ‘Introduction: Registers of Power’. In Goodale, Mark & Merry, Sally E (eds), The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law between the Global and the Local. Cambridge University Press (2007), 117–129.Google Scholar
Naffine, Ngaire, Law and the Sexes: Explorations in Feminist Jurisprudence. Allen & Unwin (1990).Google Scholar
Nair, Pooja, ‘Litigating against the Forced Sterilization of HIV-positive Women: Recent Developments in Chile and Namibia’. Harvard Human Rights Journal vol. 23 (2010), 223–231.Google Scholar
Näre, Sari, ‘“Kuin viimeistä päivää” – sota-ajan sukupuolikulttuuri ja seksuaalinen väkivalta [“As The Last Day” – Gender Culture and Sexual Violence during War Times]’. In Näre, Sari & Kirves, Jenni (eds), Ruma sota: Talvi- ja jatkosodan vaiettu historia [Ugly War: The Silenced History of the Winter and Continuation Wars]. Johnny Kniga (2008), 335–380.Google Scholar
Nergelius, Joakim, Konstitutionellt rättighetsskydd. Svensk rätt i ett komparativt perspektiv [Constitutional Protection of Rights. Swedish Law in a Comparative Perspective]. Fritzes (1996).Google Scholar
Nesheim, Britt-Ingjerd, ‘Prevensjon [Prevention]’. Store Medisinske Leksikon, sml.snl.no/prevensjon (20 February 2018).Google Scholar
Neuman, Scott, ‘North Carolina Set to Compensate Forced Sterilization Victims’. Kera News, www.keranews.org/2013-07-25/north-carolina-set-to-compensate-forced-sterilization-victims (25 July 2013).Google Scholar
Ní Aoláin, Fionnuala, ‘Sex-based Violence and the Holocaust – A Reevaluation of Harms and Rights in International Law’. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism vol. 12 (2000), 43–84.Google Scholar
Ní Aoláin, Fionnuala, Haynes, Dina F & Cahn, Naomi, ‘Criminal Justice for Gendered Violence and Beyond’. International Criminal Law Review vol. 11 (2011), 425–443.Google Scholar
Niemi-Kiesiläinen, Johanna, Honkatukia, Päivi & Ruuskanen, Minna, ‘Legal Texts as Discourses’. In Gunnarsson, Åsa, Svensson, Eva-Maria & Davies, Margaret (eds), Exploiting the Limits of Law: Swedish Feminism and the Challenge to Pessimism. Routledge (2007), 69–88.Google Scholar
Nilsson, Arne, Såna – riktiga karlar. Om manlig homosexualitet i Göteborg decennierna kring andra världskriget [Those – Real Men. On Male Homosexuality in Gothenburg in the Decades Around the Second World War]. Kartonnage (2001).Google Scholar
Nordvik, Ragnhild, ‘Erstatnings- og oppreisningsordninger for tatere/romanifolk [Compensation and Redress Schemes for Tatere/Romani People]’. In Kommunal- og moderniseringsdepartementet [The Norwegian Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation], Vedlegg til NOU 2015:7 [Annexes to NOU 2015:7] (2015), 687–697.Google Scholar
Nourse, Victoria, In Reckless Hands: Skinner v. Oklahoma and the Near Triumph of American Eugenics. W W Norton and Company (2008).Google Scholar
Nousiainen, Kevät, Gunnarsson, Åsa, Lundström, Karin & Niemi-Kiesiläinen, Johanna (eds), Responsible Selves: Women in the Nordic Legal Culture. Ashgate (2001).Google Scholar
Nownes, Anthony J, Organizing for Transgender Rights: Collective Action, Group Development, and the Rise of a New Social Movement. State University of New York Press (2019).Google Scholar
O’Flaherty, Michael & Fisher, John, ‘Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and International Human Rights Law: Contextualising the Yogyakarta Principles’. Human Rights Law Review vol. 8 no. 2 (2008), 207–248.Google Scholar
Ordover, Nancy, American Eugenics: Race, Queer Anatomy, and the Science of Nationalism. University of Minnesota Press (2003).Google Scholar
Oslo University Hospital, Høringsnotat vedr utkast til rapport om “Behandlingstilbudet til transseksuelle og transpersoner i Norge” [Consultation Document referring to Draft Report “Treatments Offered to Transsexuals and Trans People in Norway”]. Letter to the Norwegian Directorate of Health (2011).Google Scholar
Patel, Priti, ‘Forced Sterilization of Women as Discrimination’. Public Health Reviews vol. 38 no. 15 (2017), 1–12.Google Scholar
Petrén, Gustaf, ‘Domstols lagprövningsrätt [Judicial Review]’. Svensk juristtidning no. 1 (1956), 500–509.Google Scholar
Pimenoff, Veronica, ‘Transseksuaalisuus [Transsexualism]’. Duodecim vol. 109 no. 4 (1993), 368–375.Google Scholar
Pimenoff, Veronica, ‘On the Care of Transsexuals in Finland’. International Journal of Transgenderism vol. 9 no. 2 (2006), 23–33.Google Scholar
Pimenoff, Veronica, Geschlechtsumwandlung in Finnland 1970–2002: Eine historische und empirische Studie zu Geschlechtsumwandlungen unter den Regelungen des Kastrationsgesetzes bis zur Einführung des finnischen Transsexuellengesetzes [Gender Reassignment in Finland 1970–2002: A Historical and Empirical Study of Gender Reassignment under the Regulation of the Castration Act to the Introduction of the Finnish Transsexual Act]. University of Ulm, MD Dissertation (2008).Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca, It Was Like a Fever: Storytelling in Protest and Politics. The University of Chicago Press (2006).Google Scholar
Raevaara, Tiina, ‘Miehet synnyttävät, hah hah haa! [Men Give Birth, Ha Ha Ha!]’. Suomen Kuvalehti, suomenkuvalehti.fi/tarinoitatieteesta/miehet-synnyttavat-hah-hah-haa/ (4 February 2012).Google Scholar
Rastas, Merja, Oikeus oman identiteetin mukaiseen elämään – tutkimus transseksuaalien elämästä ja asemasta Suomessa [Right to Live as Oneself: Investigation of the Life and Position of Transsexuals in Finland]. The Finnish Board of Social and Health Affairs Report No. 55 (1992).Google Scholar
Reinsberg, Lisa & Juaristi, Francisco R, ‘IACtHR Holds Bolivia Responsible for Forced Sterilization in Landmark Judgment’. International Justice Resource Center, www.ijrcenter.org/2017/01/03/iacthr-holds-bolivia-responsible-for-forced-sterilization-in-landmark-judgment/ (3 January 2017).Google Scholar
Remes, Mikaela, Tabermann, Johannes & Mallén, Ingrid, ‘Nu ska samerna få berätta sin historia som innehåller tvångsförfinskning och våld – regeringen ger 1,5 miljoner till sanningskommission [Now the Sámi People Will Tell their History Containing Forced Fennofication and Violence – The Government Gives 1,5 Million to Truth Commission]’. YLE, svenska.yle.fi/artikel/2018/09/04/nu-ska-samerna-fa-beratta-sin-historia-som-innehaller-tvangsforfinskning-och-vald (4 September 2018).Google Scholar
Renz, Flora, ‘Stopping Forced Sterilisation Is Not Enough – The Limitations of the Recent ECHR Judgement on Trans Rights’. Verfassungsblog, verfassungsblog.de/stopping-forced-sterilisation-is-not-enough-the-limitations-of-the-recent-echr-judgement-on-trans-rights/ (13 April 2017).Google Scholar
Repo, Jemima, The Biopolitics of Gender. Oxford University Press (2015).Google Scholar
Repo, Jemima, ‘Governing Juridical Sex: Gender Recognition and the Biopolitics of Trans Sterilization in Finland’. Politics & Gender vol. 38 no. 1 (2019), 83–106.Google Scholar
RFSL, ‘RFSL om skadestånd till tvångssteriliserade transpersoner [RFSL on Compensation to Forcibly Sterilised Trans People]’. YouTube, www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bnS1Wajw5g (30 June 2015).Google Scholar
RFSL, Remissyttrande över Förslag till lag om ersättning till personer som har fått ändrad könstillhörighet fastställd i vissa fall (Ds 2017:6) [Comment on Proposal for Act on Compensation to People Who Have Obtained Legal Gender Recognition under Certain Circumstances]. Report no. S2017/01918/FS. Statement to the Swedish Government (2017).Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas & Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction’. In Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C & Sikkink, Kathryn (eds), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge University Press (1999), 1–38.Google Scholar
Robertson, Gary, ‘Virginia Lawmakers OK Payout to Forced Sterilization Survivors’. Reuters, www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-virginia-sterilization-idUSKBN0LU2D420150226 (26 February 2015).Google Scholar
Roivainen, Ida, ‘EU-komissio kehottaa Suomea muuttamaan translakiaan – “Rikkoo ihmisen perusoikeuksia” [The European Commission Urges Finland to Amend its Trans Act – “Violates Constitutional Rights”]’. Aamulehti, www.aamulehti.fi/a/200240903 (2 July 2017).Google Scholar
Rosef, Thea, ‘Krever kompensasjon for steriliserte transpersoner: – En umenneskelig praksis [Compensation Required for Sterilised Trans People: – An Inhuman Practice]’. VG, www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/i/awmz8O/krever-kompensasjon-for-steriliserte-transpersoner-en-umenneskelig-praksis (27 June 2020).Google Scholar
Roll-Hansen, Nils, ‘Eugenics in Scandinavia after 1945: Change of Values and Growth in Knowledge’. Scandinavian Journal of History vol. 24 no. 2 (1999), 199–213.Google Scholar
Roll-Hansen, Nils, ‘Norwegian Eugenics: Sterilization as Social Reform’. In Broberg, Gunnar & Roll-Hansen, Nils (eds), Eugenics and the Welfare State: Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. Michigan State University Press (2005), 151–194.Google Scholar
Roll-Hansen, Nils, ‘Some Thoughts on Genetics and Politics. The Historical Misrepresentation of Scandinavian Eugenics and Sterilization’. In Petermann, Heike I, Harper, Peter S & Doetz, Susanne (eds), History of Human Genetics: Aspects of Its Development and Global Perspectives. Springer (2017), 167–187.Google Scholar
Romanifolkets landsforening [The Romani People’s Association of Norway], Satisfaction of a People: Tatere Before and Now. Romanifolkets landsforening (2000).Google Scholar
Rubio-Marín, Ruth, ‘Introduction: A Gender and Reparations Taxonomy’. In Rubio-Marín, Ruth (ed), The Gender of Reparations: Unsettling Sexual Hierarchies while Redressing Human Rights Violations. Cambridge University Press (2009a), 1–17.Google Scholar
Rubio-Marín, Ruth, ‘Gender and Collective Reparations in the Aftermath of Conflict and Political Repression’. In Rubio-Marín, Ruth (ed), The Gender of Reparations: Unsettling Sexual Hierarchies while Redressing Human Rights Violations. Cambridge University Press (2009b), 381–402.Google Scholar
Rubio-Marín, Ruth, ‘Reparations for Conflict-related Sexual and Reproductive Violence: A Decalogue’. William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law vol. 19 no. 1 (2012), 69–104.Google Scholar
Rubio-Marín, Ruth & De Greiff, Pablo, ‘Women and Reparations’. International Journal of Transitional Justice vol. 1 no. 3 (2007), 318–337.Google Scholar
Rubio-Marín, Ruth & Möschel, Mathias, ‘Anti-Discrimination Exceptionalism: Racist Violence before the ECtHR and the Holocaust Prism’. European Journal of International Law vol. 24 no. 4 (2015), 881–899.Google Scholar
Rubio-Marín, Ruth & Sandoval, Clara, ‘Engendering the Reparations Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: The Promise of the Cotton Field Judgment’. Human Rights Quarterly vol. 33 no. 4 (2011), 1062–1091.Google Scholar
Runcis, Maija, Steriliseringar i folkhemmet [Sterilisations in the People’s Home]. Ordfront (1998).Google Scholar
Runcis, Maija, Makten över barnen: tvångsomhändertagande av barn i Sverige 1928–1969 [The Power over the Children: Forced Custody of Children in Sweden 1928–1969]. Atlas (2007).Google Scholar
Runcis, Maija, ‘Historikern, experterna och steriliseringarna av resanderomer [The Historian, the Experts and the Sterilisations of Travelling Romani]’. In Elgán, Elisabeth & Sandén, Annika (eds), Kunskapens tider: Historiska perspektiv på kunskapssamhället [Times of Knowledge: Historical Perspectives on the Society of Knowledge]. Stockholm University Press (2016), 110–127.Google Scholar
Rydström, Jens, ‘“Sodomitical Sins Are Threefold”: Typologies of Bestiality, Masturbation, and Homosexuality in Sweden, 1880–1950’. Journal of the History of Sexuality vol. 9 no. 3 (2000), 240–276.Google Scholar
Rydström, Jens, Sinners and Citizens: Bestiality and Homosexuality in Sweden, 1880–1950. The University of Chicago Press (2003).Google Scholar
Rydström, Jens, ‘Piska och morot. HBT mellan stat och folkrörelse 1944–2007 [Stick and Carrot. HBT between State and Social Movement 1944–2007]’. In Marika Hedin, Urban Lundberg, Rydström, Jens & Tydén, Mattias (eds), Staten som vän eller fiende? Individ och samhälle i svenskt 1900-tal [The State as Friend or Foe? Individual and Society in 20th Century Sweden]. Institutet för framtidsstudier (2007a), 157–192.Google Scholar
Rydström, Jens, ‘Sweden 1864–1978: Beasts and Beauties’. In Rydström, Jens & Mustola, Kati (eds), Criminally Queer: Homosexuality and Criminal Law in Scandinavia 1842–1999. Aksant Academic Publishers (2007b), 183–213.Google Scholar
Salmiala, Bruno, ‘Onko pakkokastratio oikeus- ja kulttuurivaltiossa hyväksyttävä reaktiomuoto rikoksen seurauksena? [Is Forced Castration an Acceptable Consequence of a Crime in a Rule of Law Culture?]’. Defensor Legis (1951) 130–167.Google Scholar
Salminen, Janne, ’Den konstitutionella identiteten, förändringen och Finland [Constitutional Identity, Change and Finland]’. Retfærd – The Nordic Journal of Law and Justice vol. 37 no. 4 (2014), 41–65.Google Scholar
Sandal, Sigrid, ‘Kirurgi og byråkrati: Eit historisk blikk på etablering av praksis kring kjønnsbekreftande behandling i Noreg 1952–1979 [Surgery and Bureaucracy: A Historical Glance at the Establishment of Practice surrounding Gender-affirming Treatment in Norway 1952–1979]’. In Hellum, Anne & Sørlie, Anniken (eds), Frihet, likhet og mangfold [Freedom, Equality and Diversity]. Gyldendal (2021), 42–62.Google Scholar
Schabas, William A, The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute. Oxford University Press (2016).Google Scholar
Schaps, Karolin, ‘Netherlands to Compensate Trans Victims of Forced Sterilisation’. Reuters, www.reuters.com/article/us-netherlands-lgbt-sterilisation-idUSKBN28B5UX (1 December 2020).Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A, The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. University of Michigan Press (2004).Google Scholar
Scheinin, Martin, Lausunto [Statement]. Letter to the Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (1992).Google Scholar
Scheinin, Martin, ‘Incorporation and Implementation of Human Rights in Finland’. In Scheinin, Martin (ed), International Human Rights Norms in the Nordic and Baltic Countries. Martinus Nijhoff (1996), 257–294.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane, ‘Constitutional Ethnography: An Introduction’. Law & Society Review vol. 38 no. 3 (2004), 389–406.Google Scholar
Schlüter, Ragnhild, De reisende: En norsk minoritets historie og kultur [The Travellers: The History and Culture of a Norwegian Minority]. Ad Notam Gyldendal (1993).Google Scholar
Schultz, Mårten, ‘Rights Through Torts: The Rise of a Rights Discourse in Swedish Tort Law’. European Review of Private Law vol. 17 no. 3 (2009), 305–333.Google Scholar
Schultz, Mårten, ‘Skadestånd som medel för ersättning vid kränkningar av mänskliga rättigheter [Compensation as Reparations for Human Rights Violations]’. In Mirchadani, Karin B & Ståhl, Kristina (eds), Förhandlingarna vid det 39:e nordiska juristmötet i Stockholm 18–19 augusti 2011 [Negotiations at the 39th Nordic Law Meeting in Stockholm 18–19 August 2011]. De nordiske juristmøder (2011), 217–236.Google Scholar
Sejersted, Fredrik, Kontroll og konstitusjon [Control and Constitution]. Cappelen Akademisk Forlag (2002).Google Scholar
Seta, ‘Erilaiset häät [A Different Kind of Wedding]’. Seta-lehti no. 2 (1987).Google Scholar
Shaw, Laura, ‘Iceland’. Eugenics Archive, eugenicsarchive.ca/discover/connections/530b9af676f0db569b00000f (24 February 2014).Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah, Remedies in International Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press (2015).Google Scholar
Shriver, Thomas E, Bray, Laura A & Adams, Alison E, ‘Legal Repression of Protesters: The Case of Worker Revolt in Czechoslovakia’. Mobilization: An International Quarterly vol. 23 no. 3 (2018), 307–328.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva, ‘The Constitutionalization of Abortion’. In Rosenfeld, Michel & Sajó, András (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford University Press (2012), 1057–1078.Google Scholar
Sifris, Ronli, Reproductive Freedom, Torture and International Human Rights. Routledge (2014).Google Scholar
Silver, Michael G, ‘Eugenics and Compulsory Sterilization Laws: Providing Redress for the Victims of a Shameful Area in United States History’, George Washington Law Review vol. 72 no. 4 (2004) 862–892.Google Scholar
Siverskog, Anna, Queera livslopp: Att leva och åldras som lhbtq-person i en heteronormativ värld [Queer Life Courses: To Live and Age as an LGBTQ Person in a Heteronormative World]. Linköping Studies in Art and Science No.702, PhD thesis (2016).Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A, Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge University Press (2009).Google Scholar
Sisula-Tulokas, Lena, Sveda, värk och annat lidande [Pain and Other Suffering]. Juristförbundets förlag (1995).Google Scholar
Smith, Andrea, Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide. Duke University Press (2005).Google Scholar
Smith, Carsten, ‘Om Høyesteretts forhold til den Europeiske menneskerettskonvensjon [About the Norwegian Supreme Court’s Relationship to the ECHR]’. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Menneskerettigheter, vol. 23 no. 4 (2005), 433–440.Google Scholar
Smith, Eivind, ‘The Constitution between Politics and Law’. In Smith, Eivind (ed), The Constitution as an Instrument of Change. SNS Forlag (2003a), 21–52.Google Scholar
Smith, Eivind, ‘Courts and Parliament: The Norwegian System of Judicial Review of Legislation’. In Smith, Eivind (ed), The Constitution as an Instrument of Change. SNS Forlag (2003b), 171–187.Google Scholar
Smith, Eivind, Konstitusjonelt demokrati: Statsforfatningsretten i prinsipielt og komparativt lys [Constitutional Democracy: Constitutional Law in the Light of Principle and Comparison]. Fagbokforlaget (2015).Google Scholar
Snow, David A & Benford, Robert D, ‘Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization’. International Social Movement Research vol. 1 (1988), 197–217.Google Scholar
Snow, David A & Benford, Robert D, ‘Master Frames and Cycles of Protest’. In Morris, Aldon D & Mueller, Carol M (eds), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. Yale University Press (1992), 133–155.Google Scholar
Snow, David A, Rochford, E Burke, Worden, Steven K & Benford, Robert D, ‘Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation’. American Sociological Review vol. 51 no. 4 (1986), 464–481.Google Scholar
Snow, David A & Soule, Sarah A, A Primer on Social Movements. W W Norton & Company (2010).Google Scholar
Sorainen, Antu, Rikollisia sattumalta? Naisten keskinäistä haureutta koskevat oikeudenkäynnit 1950-luvun Itä-Suomessa [Criminals by Chance? Trials on Unchastity between Women in 1950s Eastern Finland]. University of Helsinki, PhD thesis (2005).Google Scholar
Sørlie, Anniken, Retten til kjønnsidentitet som menneskerettighet: Kan norsk forvaltningspraksis’ krav om irreversibel sterilisering ved endring av fødselsnummer forsvares? [The Right to Gender Identity as a Human Right: Can the Requirement in Norwegian Administrative Practice of Irreversible Sterilisation when Changing Personal Identity Number be Defended?]. University of Oslo, Kvinnerettslig skriftserie no. 90 (2013).Google Scholar
Sørlie, Anniken, ‘Tvungen identitet – en vurdering av norsk forvaltningspraksis’ krav om irreversibel sterilisering ved endring av juridisk kjønn [Forced Identity – An Evaluation of the Requirement of Irreversible Sterilisation when Amending Legal Gender in Norwegian Administrative Practice]’. Tidsskrift for familierett, arverett og barnevernrettslige spørsmål vol. 12 no. 4 (2014), 272–295.Google Scholar
Sørlie, Anniken, ‘Legal Gender Meets Reality: A Socio-Legal Children’s Perspective’. Nordic Journal of Human Rights vol. 33 no. 4 (2015), 353–279.Google Scholar
Sørlie, Anniken, ‘Rettighetssubjekter i endring: den fødende mannen [Legal Subjects in Change: The Man Giving Birth]’. In Ikdahl, Ingunn & Blaker Strand, Vibeke (eds), Rettigheter i velferdsstaten: Begreper, trender, teorier [Rights in the Welfare State: Terms, Trends, Theories]. Gyldendal (2016), 227–248.Google Scholar
Sørlie, Anniken, ‘The Right to Trans-specific Healthcare in Norway: Understanding the Health Needs of Transgender People’. Medical Law Review (2018), 1–23.Google Scholar
Speed, Shannon, ‘Exercising Rights and Reconfiguring Resistance in the Zapatista Juntas de Buen Gobierno’. In Goodale, Mark & Merry, Sally E (eds), The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law between the Global and the Local. Cambridge University Press (2007), 163–192.Google Scholar
Spektorowski, Alberto & Ireni-Saban, Liza, Politics of Eugenics: Productionism, Population, and National Welfare. Routledge (2014).Google Scholar
Sperfeldt, Christoph, ‘Rome’s Legacy: Negotiating the Reparations Mandate of the International Criminal Court’. International Criminal Law Review vol. 17 no. 2 (2017), 351–377.Google Scholar
Sprengel, Vivianne, ‘Skadestånd krävs för tvångssterilisering [Compensation Is Requested for Forced Sterilisation]’. Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå (9 October 1987).Google Scholar
Sprengel, Vivianne & Dahlgren, Peter, ‘Steril [Barren]’. Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå (12 August 1986).Google Scholar
Stote, Karen, An Act of Genocide: Colonialism and the Sterilization of Aboriginal Women. Fernwood Publishing (2015).Google Scholar
Sutton, Christopher JG, ‘The History of Hysterectomy’. In Alkatout, Ibrahim & Mettler, Liselotte (eds), Hysterectomy: A Comprehensive Surgical Approach. Springer (2018), 1–28.Google Scholar
Sveriges Radio, Kräver skadestånd för tvångssterilisering [Demand Compensation for Forced Sterilisation], sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=1646&artikel=5573519 (24 June 2013).Google Scholar
Sweet, Alec S, ‘On the Constitutionalisation of the Convention: The European Court of Human Rights as a Constitutional Court’. Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship Series, paper 71 (2009).Google Scholar
Syse, Aslak, ‘Om åndssvakhet og tvangssterilisering på eugenisk grunnlag [About Feeblemindedness and Forced Sterilisation on Eugenic Grounds]’. Kritisk Juss vol. 27 no. 1–2 (2001), 35–62.Google Scholar
Tamayo, Giulia, Nada personal: Reporte de derechos humanos sobra la aplicación de la anticoncepción quirúrgica en el Perú 1996–1998 [Nothing Personal: Human Rights Report on the Application of Surgical Contraception in Peru 1996–1998]. CLADEM (1999).Google Scholar
Tams, Christian J; Berster, Lars & Schiffbauer, Björn, Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide: A Commentary. Hart Publishing (2014).Google Scholar
The Japan Times, Records of Sterilizations under Japan’s Scrapped Eugenics Law Could Help Victims Seek State Compensation, www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/01/25/national/social-issues/survey-finds-records-remain-past-sterilizations-2700-japan-scrapped-eugenics-law/#.WurF39PRDBI (25 January 2018).Google Scholar
Theilen, Jens T, ‘Depathologisation of Transgenderism and International Human Rights Law’. Human Rights Law Review vol. 14 no. 2 (2014), 327–342.Google Scholar
Thune, Jens Kristian & Stiftelsen romanifolket/taterne, Vedr. Romanifolket/taterne – oppreisning/fonds/tilskudd [About the Romani People/Tatere – Redress/Funds/Subsidy]. Letter to the Norwegian Ministry of Regional Government (2003).Google Scholar
Tidningarnas telegrambyrå, Steril [Barren] (21 August 1986a).Google Scholar
Tidningarnas telegrambyrå, Steril, bakgrund [Barren, Background] (12 November 1986b).Google Scholar
Tidningarnas telegrambyrå, Steril [Barren] (30 March 1987a).Google Scholar
Tidningarnas telegrambyrå, En steriliserad får skadestånd [A Sterilised Gets Compensation] (12 November 1987b).Google Scholar
Tiusanen, Liina, ‘Helsinki pride-tapahtumaan osallistunut ministeri Tiilikainen: Translain kokonaisuudistus ei saa olla pelinappula seuraavissa hallitusneuvotteluissa [Minister Tiilikainen, who Participated in Helsinki Pride: The Complete Revision of the Trans Act Cannot Be a Pawn at the Next Negotiations for Government]’. Suomenmaa, www.suomenmaa.fi/uutiset/helsinki-pride-tapahtumaan-osallistunut-ministeri-tiilikainen-translain-kokonaisuudistus-ei-saa-olla-pelinappula-seuraavissa-hallitusneuvotteluissa-6.3.390662.98aa093fa1 (30 June 2018).Google Scholar
Tømmerås, Ane S, Billighetserstatning – og andre offentlige erstatningsordninger [Compensation Ex Gratia – and Other Public Compensation Schemes]. Universitetsforlaget (2002).Google Scholar
Tonon, Matias, ‘La reparación del daño al proyecto de vida en la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos [Reparation of Harm to Life Project in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights]’. AEQUITAS Virtual vol. 5 no. 16 (2011), 1–11.Google Scholar
Tranøy, Joar, ‘”Mindreverdig anlegg” – om sterilisering av taterjenter på skolehjem [“Inferior Features” – On Sterilisation of Tatere Girls at Residential Schools]’. Materialisten vol. 23 no. 2/3 (1995), 55–73.Google Scholar
Trasek & Seta, , The Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment of Trans and Intersex People in Finland. Submission to the UN Committee against Torture (2016).Google Scholar
Tsuchiya, Takashi, ‘Eugenic Sterilizations in Japan and Recent Demands for Apology: A Report’. Newsletter of the Network on Ethics and Intellectual Disability vol. 3 no. 1 (1997), 1–4.Google Scholar
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru, Rights Make Might: Global Human Rights and Minority Social Movements in Japan. Oxford University Press (2018).Google Scholar
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru & Smith, Jackie, ‘Human Rights and Social Movements: From the Boomerang Pattern to a Sandwich Effect’. In Snow, David A, Soule, Sarah A, Kriesi, Hanspeter & McCammon, Holly J (eds), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Wiley Blackwell (2019), 586–601.Google Scholar
Tydén, Mattias, Från politik till praktik: De svenska steriliseringslagarna 1935–1975 [From Politics to Practise: The Swedish sterilisation Laws 1935–1975]. Stockholm Studies in History (2002).Google Scholar
Undén, Östen, ‘Några ord om domstolskontroll över lagars grundlagsenlighet [A Few Words about Judicial Constitutional Review]’. Svensk juristtidning no. 1 (1956), 260–263.Google Scholar
Van Der Ros, Janneke, Alskens folk: Levekår, livssituasjon og livskvalitet for personer med kjønnsidentitetstematikk [All Kinds of People: Living Conditions, and Quality of Life of Individuals with Gender Identity Thematic]. Likestillingssenteret [The Norwegian Centre for Equality] (2013).Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa, Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization. Cambridge University Press (2010).Google Scholar
Vik, Hanne H & Skage, Alexander Ø, ‘Deploying the Engagement Policy: The Significance of Legal Dualism in Norway’s Support for Human Rights Treaties from the late 1970s’. Nordic Journal of Human Rights vol. 36 no. 3 (2018), 304–321.Google Scholar
Vollebæk, Knut & Plesner, Ingvill T, ‘Constitutional Protection of National Minorities’ Rights in Norway: Does It Matter?’. Nordic Journal of Human Rights vol. 32 no. 2 (2014), 176–187.Google Scholar
Walker, Margaret U, ‘Gender and Violence in Focus: A Background for Gender Justice in Reparations’. In Rubio-Marín, Ruth (ed), The Gender of Reparations: Unsettling Sexual Hierarchies while Redressing Human Rights Violations. Cambridge University Press (2009), 18–62.Google Scholar
Weedon, Chris, Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Blackwell (1987).Google Scholar
Weindling, Paul, Health, Race and German Politics between National Unification and Nazism, 1879–1945. Cambridge University Press (1989).Google Scholar
Weindling, Paul, ‘International Eugenics: Swedish Sterilization in Context’. Scandinavian Journal of History, vol. 24 no. 2 (1999), 179–197.Google Scholar
Weindling, Paul, ‘Sterilization Compensation’. Eugenics Archive, eugenicsarchive.ca/discover/connections/535eeaff7095aa0000000217 (28 April 2014).Google Scholar
Wersäll, Fredrik, ‘En offensiv Högsta domstol. Några reflektioner kring HD:s rättsbildning [An Offensive Supreme Court. Some Reflections on the Lawmaking of the Supreme Court]’. Svensk juristtidning no. 1 (2014), 1–8.Google Scholar
Wessel, Merle, ‘Castration of Male Sex Offenders in the Nordic Welfare State in the Context of Homosexuality and Heteronormativity, 1930–1955’. Scandinavian Journal of History vol. 40 no. 5 (2015), 591–609.Google Scholar
Westerlund, Ulrika, ‘RFSL: Ge skadestånd till tvångssteriliserade transpersoner [RFSL: Provide Compensation for Forcibly Sterilised Trans People]’. Dagens Arena, www.dagensarena.se/opinion/rfsl-ge-skadestand-till-tvangssteriliserade-transpersoner/ (30 June 2015).Google Scholar
Wickman, Jan, Transgender Politics: The Construction and Deconstruction of Binary Gender in the Finnish Transgender Community. Åbo Akademi University Press (2001).Google Scholar
Wiklund, Ola, ‘The Reception Process in Sweden and Norway’. In Keller, Helen & Sweet, Alec S (eds), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems. Oxford University Press (2008), 165–227.Google Scholar
Wilhelmsson, Thomas, Senmodern ansvarsrätt. Privaträtt som redskap för mikropolitik [Late Modern Liability Law. Private Law as Tool for Micropolitics]. Kauppakaari (2001).Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert A, ‘Eugenics Never Went Away’. Aeon, aeon.co/essays/eugenics-today-where-eugenic-sterilisation-continues-now (5 June 2018a).Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert A, The Eugenic Mind Project. MIT Press (2018b).Google Scholar
Wind, Marlene & Follesdal, Andreas, ‘Nordic Reluctance Towards Judicial Review Under Siege’. Nordic Journal of Human Rights vol. 27 no. 2 (2009), 131–141.Google Scholar
Winfield, Ann G, ‘Resuscitating Bad Science: Eugenics Past and Present’. In Watkins, William H (ed), The Assault on Public Education: Confronting the Politics of Corporate School Reform. Teachers College Press (2012), 143–159.Google Scholar
Winter, Stephen, ‘Australia’s Ex Gratia Redress’. Australian Indigenous Law Review vol. 13 no. 1 (2009), 49–61.Google Scholar
WPATH, Statement for Immediate Release (16 June 2010).Google Scholar
WPATH, Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender and Gender Nonconforming People. WPATH Publications (2012).Google Scholar
Yle Uutiset, Lakialoite translain muuttamisesta odottaa sosiaali- ja terveysvaliokunnan enemmistön kantaa [Legislative Initiative Awaits the Support of the Majority in the Parliamentary Social Affairs and Health Committee], yle.fi/uutiset/3-9871309 (7 October 2017).Google Scholar
Zald, Mayer N, ‘Culture, Ideology, and Strategic Framing’. In McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D & Zald, Mayer N (eds), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilising Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge University Press (1996), 261–274.Google Scholar
Zampas, Christina, ‘I.V. v. Bolivia Decision: Forced Sterilization is Based on Harmful Stereotypes’. Reprohealthlaw Blog, reprohealthlaw.wordpress.com/2017/03/29/i-v-v-bolivia-decision-forced-sterilization-is-based-on-harmful-gender-stereotypes/ (29 March 2017).Google Scholar
Zaremba, Maciej, ‘Rasren i välfärden [Racially Pure in the Welfare]’. Dagens Nyheter (20 August 1997a).Google Scholar
Zaremba, Maciej, ‘De olönsamma skars bort [The Unprofitable Were Cut Off]’. Dagens Nyheter (21 August 1997b).Google Scholar
Zaremba, Maciej, De rena och de andra: om tvångssteriliseringar, rashygien och arvssynd [The Clean Ones and the Others: On Forced Sterilisations, Racial Hygiene and Original Sin]. WSOY (1999).Google Scholar
Zondag, Martin H W, ‘Statens politikk mot tatere har vært feilslått og nedbrytende [The State’s Policy against the Tatere Has Been Wrong and Oppressive]’. NRK, www.nrk.no/norge/_-statens-politikk-mot-tatere-har-vaert-feilslatt-og-nedbrytende-1.12387816 (1 June 2015).Google Scholar
Aasen, Cesilie, Senior Counsellor at the Norwegian Directorate of Health, e-mail correspondence on 23 November 2016.Google Scholar
Abelson, Lars Göran, Former Court of Appeal Chief Judge, Main Investigator in 2007 State Report on the Health Care Needs of Intersex and Transsexuals (SOU 2007:16), personal interview on 20 September 2016.Google Scholar
Ågren, Lisa, Archivist at the Swedish Board of Health and Welfare, e-mail correspondence on 26 November 2015.Google Scholar
Andrén, Carl-Gustaf, Former University Chancellor at Lund University, Main Investigator in the Swedish Sterilisation Investigation (1997–2000), personal interview on 21 September 2016.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, Bertil, Former Professor of Law at Uppsala University, Member of the Swedish Sterilisation Investigation (1997–2000), written interviews on 31 August 2016, 1 October 2016 and 23 November 2018.Google Scholar
Broberg, Gunnar, Emeritus Professor at Lund University, Department for the History of Ideas, Member of the Swedish Sterilisation Investigation (1997–2000), personal interview 20 September 2016.Google Scholar
Bergkvist, Johanne, Romani Representative Member of the Norwegian Investigation into Oppression of the Romani Minority (NOU 2015:7), telephone interview on 27 January 2017.Google Scholar
Burman, Kerstin, Legal Representative of the Sterilisation Victims of the 1972 Gender Recognition Act, telephone interview 4 February 2015, personal interview on 8 September 2016.Google Scholar
Drefvelin, Petter, Former Head of Public Administration, Leader of the 2003 Interdepartmental Investigation on Compensation to Tatere/Romani people & Skotvedt, Tove, Former Senior Counsellor and Secretary of the 2003 Interdepartmental Investigation on Compensation to Tatere/Romani people, personal interview on 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Durbáková, Vanda, Human rights lawyer representing the applicants in K.H. and Others v. Slovakia, V.C. v. Slovakia, N.B. v. Slovakia and I.G. and Others v. Slovakia, telephone interview on 29 April 2015 and e-mail correspondence on 13 December 2017.Google Scholar
Duurhuus, Edel, Civil Servant at the Personal Registry at the Norwegian Tax Administration, e-mail correspondence on 29 November 2016.Google Scholar
Ekberg, Hedvig, Legal Counsellor at the Norwegian Association for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities (NFU), e-mail correspondence on 27 October 2016.Google Scholar
Ekeløve-Slydal, Gunnar, Deputy Secretary General of the Norwegian Helsinki Committee, personal interview on 7 December 2016.Google Scholar
Ericsson, Kjersti, Professor Emerita in Criminology at the University of Oslo & Papendorf, Knut, Professor Emeritus in Criminology and Sociology of Law, personal interview on 8 December 2016.Google Scholar
Eriksson, Panda, Former President of Trasek, personal interview on 11 September 2017.Google Scholar
Espseth, Luca Dalen, Former Advisor on Gender Diversity at FRI, Deputy Chairperson at PKI, teleconference interview on 4 January 2022.Google Scholar
Fodstad, Hjørdis, Associate Professor at Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, personal interview on 14 December 2016.Google Scholar
Frydenlund, Stein Wolff, Former Head of the FRI Trans Political Committee and LGBT Activist in Amnesty International, former Steering Committee Member of TGEU (2014–2018), personal interview on 10 December 2016.Google Scholar
González-Dominguez, Marta, Legal Advisor for Latin America and the Caribbean at the Center for Reproductive Rights, teleconference interview on 5 January 2018.Google Scholar
Grammeltvedt, Gorm, Former Department Director at NPE, Deputy Chairman at the Norwegian National Insurance Court, personal interview on 8 December 2016; e-mail correspondence on 12 December 2016.Google Scholar
Haave, Per, Researcher at the Department of Community Medicine and Global Health, University of Oslo, Author of the Report Sterilisering av tatere 1934–1977: En historisk undersøkelse av lov og praksis (2000) and Member of the State Investigation for NOU 2015:7, personal interview on 5 December 2016.Google Scholar
Hallberg, Pekka, Former President of the Supreme Administrative Court of Finland; Docent at the University of Helsinki and the University of Joensuu, e-mail correspondence on 8 July 2017.Google Scholar
Hansen, Harald M Kvame, Association Chairman of the National Association of People with Developmental Disabilities and their Relatives (LUPE), e-mail correspondence on 7 November 2016.Google Scholar
Hansen, Tone Maria, Managing Director at the Norwegian Harry Benjamin Resource Centre, e-mail correspondence on 12 December 2016.Google Scholar
Heino, Anna, Senior Planning Officer at the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, e-mail correspondence on 10 August, 18 August and 23 October 2017.Google Scholar
Hemgård, Lisbeth, Executive Manager at Inclusion Finland FDUV & Lindholm, Mikael, Former Executive Manager at Inclusion Finland FDUV, personal interview on 7 September 2017.Google Scholar
Hietala, Marjatta, Professor Emerita, Department of History, Tampere University, written interview on 11 October 2017.Google Scholar
Ilola, Santeri, Former President of Trasek, telephone interview on 30 October 2017.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Maria H, Partner at Elden Law Firm, teleconference interview on 16 December 2021.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, Anders, Quality Manager at the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, e-mail correspondence on 18 April 2017.Google Scholar
Jentoft, Christine M, Advisor on Gender Diversity at the Norwegian Organization for Sexual and Gender Diversity FRI, teleconference interview on 20 December 2021.Google Scholar
Kaatee, Patricia, Policy Advisor at the Norwegian Department of Amnesty International, personal interview on 6 December 2016.Google Scholar
Karanki, Antti, Former President of Trasek, personal interview on 6 September 2017; e-mail correspondence on 13 September 2017.Google Scholar
Karlbom, Agneta, Insurance Lawyer at the Swedish Patient Claims Panel, e-mail correspondence 30 November 2015 and personal interview on 19 September 2016.Google Scholar
Kempf, Françoise, Lam, Claudia & Mattioli-Zeltner, Géraldine, Advisors at the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, personal interview on 12 October 2017.Google Scholar
Knapskog, Arne-Birger, Senior Counsellor at the Norwegian Directorate of Health, e-mail correspondence on 3 May 2018.Google Scholar
Lahti, Raimo, Professor Emeritus of Law at the University of Helsinki; Secretary of the Revision Committee for the Abortion, Sterilisation, and Castration Legislation; Former Permanent Expert at the Finnish Board of Health/the National Supervisory Authority for Social Welfare and Health, personal interview on 8 September 2017.Google Scholar
Langseth, Helle Holst, Legal Counsellor at the Norwegian Equality and Anti-discrimination Ombud & Falch, Helene, Lawyer at the Norwegian Equality and Anti-discrimination Ombud, personal interview on 6 December 2016.Google Scholar
Lindvik, Jan Elisabeth, Leading Activist at the Norwegian Association of Trans People FTPN, personal interview on 7 December 2016.Google Scholar
Lindquist, Bosse, Author and TV Producer at SVT Dokumentär, personal interview on 13 September 2016.Google Scholar
Lindell, Karin, Former Auditor General of Sweden and External Investigator in 2010 State Report on the Health Care Needs of Transsexual People, personal interview on 15 September 2016.Google Scholar
Lomfors, Ingrid, Director at the Swedish Living History Forum, External Investigator in the Swedish Sterilisation Investigation (1997–2000), personal interview on 8 September 2016.Google Scholar
Lundell-Kiuru, Minna, Senior Officer, Specialist on Questions concerning Gender Diversity at the Finnish Ombudsman for Equality & Valleala, Aija, Senior Officer at the Finnish Ombudsman for Equality, personal interview 6 September 2017.Google Scholar
Mattila, Markku, Senior Researcher, Migration Institute of Finland and Docent, Tampere University, personal interview on 1 September 2017.Google Scholar
Moreno, Diana Carolina, Fellow, Legal, American, Latin & Program, Caribbean, The Center for Reproductive Rights, teleconference interview on 8 January 2018.Google Scholar
Myrberg, Arild Johan, Senior Counsellor at the Norwegian Directorate of Health, telephone interview on 3 and 13 February 2017.Google Scholar
Oksanen, Pia Puu, Expert on Discrimination Based on Gender and Sexuality at Amnesty International Finland, personal interview on 7 September 2017.Google Scholar
Pasquier, Liliane Maury, Member of the Council of States (Switzerland), Rapporteur for PACE Report on ‘Putting an End to Coerced Sterilisations and Castrations’; Tanja Kleinsorge, Head of the Secretariat, PACE Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development, Council of Europe & Ayşegül Elveriş, Secretary, PACE Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development, Council of Europe, personal interview on 12 October 2017.Google Scholar
Paulsrud, Kari, Leader of State Expert Investigation on Gender Identity and Gender Registration, personal interview on 9 December 2016.Google Scholar
Persson, Leif, Judge, Secretary in the Swedish Sterilisation Investigation (1997–2000); Deputy Chairperson in the Swedish Sterilisation Compensation Committee, personal interview on 20 September 2016.Google Scholar
Petersson, Stig-Åke, Archivist at the Swedish LGBTQ federation RFSL, e-mail correspondence on 17 September 2016.Google Scholar
Pimenoff, Veronica, Psychiatrist (MD), PhD, Author, Member of the Working Groups for the Report STM 2000:2 and for the Government Bill regarding the Finnish 2002 Trans Act, personal interview on 5 September 2017.Google Scholar
Plesner, Ingvill Thorson, Researcher at the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights, President of the Secretariat for Norwegian Investigation into Oppression of the Romani Minority (NOU 2015:7, 2013–2015), personal interview on 14 December 2016.Google Scholar
Rapo, Markus, Statistician at Statistics Finland, e-mail correspondence on 8 and 9 November 2017.Google Scholar
Roll-Hansen, Nils, Emeritus Professor at the University of Oslo, Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Arts and Ideas, personal interview on 13 December 2016.Google Scholar
Rogalska-Hedlund, Anna, Lawyer and Former Contributor at Centrum för rättvisa [Centre for Justice], personal interview on 19 September 2016.Google Scholar
Runcis, Maija, Associate Professor of History at Stockholm University, personal interview on 7 May 2015.Google Scholar
Rydström, Jens, Professor at Lund University, Department of Gender Studies, telephone interview on 14 September 2016.Google Scholar
Saarela, Riina, Administrative Officer at the Finnish Patient Injury Board, e-mail correspondence on 7 August 2018.Google Scholar
Salo, Aija, Former Secretary General of Finnish LGBTI federation Seta, Senior Officer at the Office of the Non-Discrimination Ombudsman, personal interview on 4 September 2017.Google Scholar
Sandegård, Frida, Former Secretary General of the Swedish LGBTQI federation RFSL, personal interview on 16 September 2016.Google Scholar
Scheinin, Martin, British Academy Global Professor, Bonavero Institute of Human Rights, University of Oxford and Professor at the Department of Law, European University Institute, personal interview on 23 October 2017.Google Scholar
Sisula-Tulokas, Lena, Professor Emerita of Law, University of Helsinki, personal interview on 8 September 2017.Google Scholar
Skarhed, Anna, Former Swedish Chancellor of Justice, personal interview on 14 September 2016.Google Scholar
Socialstyrelsens upplysningstjänst [The Information Service of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare], e-mail correspondence on 28 March 2018.Google Scholar
Söderlund, Désirée, Member of the Working Group for the state report STM 2000:2, personal interview on 4 September 2017.Google Scholar
Sørlie, Anniken, Associate Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, OsloMet University, personal interview on 7 December 2016.Google Scholar
Sørlie-Rogne, Heidi, Professional Leader of the Rights Centre of the Norwegian Federation of Organisations of Disabled People (FFO), e-mail correspondence on 26 October 2016.Google Scholar
Sundkvist, Elida, Specialist at the Swedish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, written interview on 3 October and 5 December 2016.Google Scholar
Syse, Aslak, Emeritus Professor in Welfare and Health Law at Oslo University, Former Member of the Sterilisation Council, e-mail correspondence on 25 October 2016.Google Scholar
Tonning, Lena Røst, Senior Executive Officer at the Norwegian Civil Affairs Authority, e-mail correspondence on 13 March 2018.Google Scholar
Tystad, Arnstein, Counsellor at the Norwegian Civil Affairs Authority, e-mail correspondence on 19 October 2016.Google Scholar
Törngren, Erland, Unit Manager at the Swedish Legal, Financial and Administrative Services Agency, e-mail correspondence on 9 October 2020.Google Scholar
Van der Ros, Janneke, Associate Professor in Political Science, Lillehammer University College, teleconference interview on 2 January 2017.Google Scholar
Vigardt, Kai-Samuel, Romani Rights Activist, telephone interview on 1 February 2017.Google Scholar
Vilenius, Miika, Registrar at the Chancellor of Justice, e-mail correspondence on 26 November 2015.Google Scholar
Westerlund, Ulrika, Former President of the Swedish LGBTQI federation RFSL and Former Board Member of TGEU, personal interview on 16 September 2016 and telephone interview on 16 February 2015.Google Scholar
Wilhelmsson, Thomas, Professor Emeritus of Law at the University of Helsinki and Former Chancellor of the University of Helsinki, personal interview on 5 September 2017.Google Scholar
Zaremba, Maciej, Author, Journalist at Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter, personal interview on 13 September 2016.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Daniela Alaattinoğlu, University of Turku, Finland
  • Book: Grievance Formation, Rights and Remedies
  • Online publication: 18 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009171663.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Daniela Alaattinoğlu, University of Turku, Finland
  • Book: Grievance Formation, Rights and Remedies
  • Online publication: 18 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009171663.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Daniela Alaattinoğlu, University of Turku, Finland
  • Book: Grievance Formation, Rights and Remedies
  • Online publication: 18 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009171663.013
Available formats
×