Book contents
- Governing Markets as Knowledge Commons
- Cambridge Studies on Governing Knowledge Commons
- Governing Markets as Knowledge Commons
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The Contribution Good as the Foundation of the Industrial Revolution
- 2 On the Social Evolution of Knowledge
- 3 Individual Sovereignty and Coproduction of Knowledge Governance
- 4 Common Sense Commons
- 5 Conventions as Shared Cognitive Infrastructures
- 6 Property Rights, Knowledge Commons, and Blockchain Governance
- 7 Knowledge Commons, Social Infrastructures, and Informal Markets
- 8 Entrepreneurship and Governance in the Scotch Whisky Knowledge Commons
- 9 Trolling in the Deep
- 10 Crowdfunding the Queer Museum
- 11 Understanding Different Qualities of the Knowledge Commons in Contemporary Cities
- References
4 - Common Sense Commons
The Case of Commonsensical Social Norms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 December 2021
Book contents
- Governing Markets as Knowledge Commons
- Cambridge Studies on Governing Knowledge Commons
- Governing Markets as Knowledge Commons
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The Contribution Good as the Foundation of the Industrial Revolution
- 2 On the Social Evolution of Knowledge
- 3 Individual Sovereignty and Coproduction of Knowledge Governance
- 4 Common Sense Commons
- 5 Conventions as Shared Cognitive Infrastructures
- 6 Property Rights, Knowledge Commons, and Blockchain Governance
- 7 Knowledge Commons, Social Infrastructures, and Informal Markets
- 8 Entrepreneurship and Governance in the Scotch Whisky Knowledge Commons
- 9 Trolling in the Deep
- 10 Crowdfunding the Queer Museum
- 11 Understanding Different Qualities of the Knowledge Commons in Contemporary Cities
- References
Summary
Common sense is fundamental to humanity in two different but related ways. First, it is a basic capability essential to human flourishing. It helps us effectively engage with each other and our complex world. Second, it is social knowledge, often situational and contextual. Though easily taken for granted, common sense functions as critical social infrastructure that shapes and enables various social systems, including markets. This chapter examines this special type of social infrastructure, exploring common sense in general and focusing on the subset of common sense that also constitutes social norms.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Governing Markets as Knowledge Commons , pp. 113 - 132Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Akerlof, George A. 1976. “The Economics of Caste and of the Rat Race and Other Woeful Tales.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 90 (4): 599–617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1885324.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1971. “A Utilitarian Approach to the Concept of Equality in Public Expenditure.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 85 (3): 409–415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1885930.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, Cristina, Muldoon, Ryan, and Sontuoso, Alessandro. 2018. “Social Norms.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition), edited by Zalta, Edward N..Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules L. 1989. “Afterword: Rational Choice Approach to Legal Rules.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 65 (1): 177–191.Google Scholar
Cornes, Richard, and Sandler, Todd. 1996. The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dekker, Erwin, and Kuchař, Pavel. 2019. “Lachmann and Shackle: On the Joint Production of Interpretation Instruments.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 37B, 25–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/s0743–41542019000037b005.Google Scholar
Erion, Gerald. 2001. “The Cartesian Test for Automatism.” Minds and Machines 11 (1): 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frischmann, Brett M. 2007. “Cultural Environmentalism and the Wealth of Networks.” University of Chicago Law Review 74: 1083–1911.Google Scholar
Frischmann, Brett M. 2012. Infrastructure: The Social Value of Shared Resources. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frischmann, Brett M., and Selinger, Evan. 2018. Re-engineering Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frischmann, Brett M., Madison, Michael J., and Strandburg, Katherine J., Eds. 2014. Governing Knowledge Commons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Susan A., and Gottfried, Gail M.. 1996. “Children’s Causal Explanations of Animate and Inanimate Motion.” Child Development 67: 1970–1987.Google Scholar
Gelman, Susan A., and Wellman, Henry A.. 1991. “Insides and Essences: Early Understandings of the Non-obvious.” Cognition 39: 213–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, Dan. 2016. Frequent Password Changes Are the Enemy of Security, FTC Technologist Says, ars technica (August 2, 2016), https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/08/frequent-password-changes-are-the-enemy-of-security-ftc-technologist-says/.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M. 2008. “Fairness and Social Norms.” Philosophy of Science 75 (5): 850–860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/594529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuchař, Pavel. 2016. “Entrepreneurship and Institutional Change.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 26: 349–379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-015-0433-5Google Scholar
Leslie, Alan M. 1984. “Spatiotemporal Continuity and the Perception of Causality in Infants.” Perception 13: 287–305.Google Scholar
Leslie, Alan M., and Keeble, Stephanie. 1987. “Do Six-Month-Old Infants Perceive Causality?” Cognition 25: 265–288.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1969. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470693711.Google Scholar
Medin, Douglas L., and Ortony, Andrew. 1989. “Psychological Essentialism.” In Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, edited by Ortony, Andrew and Vosniadou, Stella, 179–185. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nissenbaum, Helen. 2009. Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, David R. 1987. “Schooling and the Transformation of Common Sense.” In Common Sense: The Foundations for Social Science, edited by van Holthoon, Frits and Olson, David R., 327. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, J. Robert. 1954. Science and the Common Understanding. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pepinsky, Pauline N. 1994. Worlds of Common Sense: Equality, Identity, and Two Modes of Impulse Management. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Premack, David. 1990. “The Infant’s Theory of Self-Propelled Objects.” Cognition 36: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redekop, Benjamin W. 2009. “Common Sense in Philosophical and Scientific Perspective.” Management Decision 47 (3): 399–412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910946679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redekop, Benjamin W. 2020. Common Sense and Science: From Aristotle to Reid. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1954. “A Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” Review of Economics and Statistics 36: 387.Google Scholar
Sanfilippo, Madelyn R., Frischmann, Brett M., and Strandburg, Katherine J.. 2018. “Privacy as Commons: Case Evaluation through the Governing Knowledge Commons Framework.” Journal of Information Policy 8: 116–166.Google Scholar
Thibaut, John W., and Kelley, Harold H.. 1959. The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ur, Blase, Kelley, Patrick G., Komanduri, Saranga et al. 2012. “Helping users create better passwords.” USENIX. www.usenix.org/system/files/login/articles/login1212_ur.pdf.Google Scholar