Book contents
- Governing in a Polarized Age
- Governing in a Polarized Age
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Political Representation and Democratic Accountability
- Part II Continuity and Change in Party Organizations
- Part III Partisanship and Governmental Performance
- Part IV Conclusions
- Index
- References
Part III - Partisanship and Governmental Performance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 October 2016
Book contents
- Governing in a Polarized Age
- Governing in a Polarized Age
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Political Representation and Democratic Accountability
- Part II Continuity and Change in Party Organizations
- Part III Partisanship and Governmental Performance
- Part IV Conclusions
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Governing in a Polarized AgeElections, Parties, and Political Representation in America, pp. 221 - 368Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
References
Binder, Sarah A. 1999. “Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947–1996.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 519–533.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 2011. “Legislative Productivity and Gridlock.” In Oxford Handbook of the American Congress, Schickler, Eric and Lee, Frances E., eds. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edward, George C. III, Barrett, Andrew, and Peake, Jeffrey. 1997. “The Legislative Impact of Divided Government.” American Journal of Political Science 41(2): 545–563.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 2006. “Parties as Problem Solvers.” In Promoting the General Welfare, Patashnik, Eric and Gerber, Alan, eds. Brookings Institution Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmour, John. 1995. Strategic Disagreement: Stalemate in American Politics. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2013. “Presidents and Party Teams: Debt Limits and Executive Oversight, 2001–2013.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 43(4): 775–91.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2012. It’s Even Worse than It Looks. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 2006. “Congress as Problem Solver.” In Promoting the General Welfare, Patashnik, Eric and Gerber, Alan, eds. Brookings Institution Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Mark. 2010. “The do something Congress.” NBC News First Read. http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2010/12/21/5689395-the-do-something-congress?lite [Accessed May 11, 2014].Google Scholar
Riffkin, Rebecca. 2014. “Public faith in Congress falls again, hits historic low.” www.gallup.com/poll/171710/public-faith-congress-falls-again-hits-historic-low.aspx [Accessed June 25, 2015].Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S. 2010. “The Senate Syndrome,” Issues in Governance Studies, No. 35 (June). www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2010/06/cloture-smith [Accessed May 11, 2014].Google Scholar
Steinhauer, Jennifer. 2012. “A Showdown Long Foreseen.” New York Times, Dec. 30. www.nytimes.com/2012/12/31/us/politics/fiscal-crisis-impasse-long-in-the-making.html [Accessed May 11, 2014].Google Scholar
Stevenson, Betsey and Wolfers, Justin. 2012. “Debt-Ceiling Déjà Vu Could Sink Economy.” Bloomberg, May 28. www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-28/debt-ceiling-deja-vu-could-sink-economy.html [Accessed May 11, 2014].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundquist, James L. 1988–89. “Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 103(4): 613–35.Google Scholar
Voteview. 2012. “Polarization in Real (and Asymmetric),” Voteview Blog, May 16. http://voteview.com/blog/?p=494 [Accessed May 11, 2014].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Aldrich, John H. and Niemi, Richard G.. 1996. “The Sixth American Party System: Electoral Change, 1952–1992,” in Craig, Stephen, ed. Broken Contract? Changing Relationships between Americans and Their Government. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H. and Grant, Ruth W.. 1993. “The Anti-Federalists, the First Congress, and the First Parties.” Journal of Politics 55(2): 295–326.Google Scholar
Brady, David W. and Volden, Craig. 1998. Revolving Gridlock: Politics and Policy from Carter to Clinton. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Castel, Albert and Gibson, Scott L.. 1975. The Yeas and the Nays: Key Congressional Decisions, 1774–1945. Kalamazoo, MI: New Issues Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, Joshua and Lapinski, John. 2006. “Measuring Legislative Accomplishment, 1874–1994.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 232–249.Google Scholar
Galloway, George B. and Wise, Sidney. 1976. History of the House of Representatives. New York: Crowell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, William, Adler, Scott, Cameron, Charles, and Reimann, Charles. 2000. “Divided Government and the Legislative Productivity of Congress, 1945–1994.” Legislative Studies Quarterly XXV(2): 285–312.Google Scholar
Josephy, Alvin M. 1975. The American Heritage History of the Congress of the United States. New York: American Heritage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2012. It’s Even Worse than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 2000. America’s Congress: Actions in the Public Sphere, James Madison through Newt Gingrich. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1993. “America’s First Social Security System: The Expansion of Benefits for Civil War Veterans.” Political Science Quarterly 108: 85–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1995. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bibliography
Adler, E. Scott and Wilkerson, John D.. Congress and the Politics of Policymaking. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012Google Scholar
Arnold, R. Douglas. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990Google Scholar
Bardach, Eugene. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2009Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D.. The Politics of Information: Problem Definition and the Course of Public Policy in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary. “A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 (1983): 371–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Christopher R., Burden, Barry C., and Howell, William G.. “After Enactment: The Lives and Deaths of Federal Programs.” American Journal of Political Science 54.1 (2010): 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimber, Bruce. “Information as a Factor in Congressional Politics.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16 (November 1991): 585–605Google Scholar
Bimber, Bruce. The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey E. The President’s Legislative Policy Agenda, 1789–2002. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012Google Scholar
Congress of the United States Congressional Budget Office. “Who Pays and When? An Assessment of Generational Accounting.” Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1995Google Scholar
Derthick, Martha and Quirk, Paul J.. The Politics of Deregulation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1985Google Scholar
Drutman, Lee and Teles, Steven M., “A New Agenda for Political Reform.” The Washington Monthly, May 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterling, Kevin. The Political Economy of Expertise: Information and Efficiency in American National Politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2004Google Scholar
Ellwood, John W. and Patashnik, Eric M.. “In Praise of Pork.” National Affairs 110 (1993): 19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Diana. Greasing the Wheels: Using Pork Barrel Projects to Build Majority Coalitions in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. New York: Longman, 1978Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. Defending Congress and the Constitution. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2011Google Scholar
Frankel, Jeffrey A. and Orszag, Peter R.. American Economic Policy in the 1990s. Boston: MIT Press, 2002Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S. and Patashnik, Eric M., eds. Promoting the General Welfare: New Perspectives on Government Performance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2006Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S. and Patashnik, Eric M.. “Sham Surgery: The Problem of Inadequate Medical Evidence,” in Gerber, Alan S. and Patashnik, Eric M., eds., Promoting the General Welfare: New Perspectives on Government Performance. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S. and Patashnik, Eric M.. “The Politicization of Evidence-Based Medicine: The Limits of Pragmatic Problem Solving in an Era of Polarization.” California Journal of Politics and Policy 3.4 (2011)Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012Google Scholar
Haberkorn, Jennifer. “Eric Cantor Pledges another Obamacare Repeal Vote.” Politico, May 3, 2013 (www.politico.com/story/2013/05/obamacare-repeal-vote-eric-cantor-90900.html)Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. and Pierson, Paul. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer – and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard L. and Deardorff, Alan V., “Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy,” American Political Science Review, 100.1 (February 2006): 69–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskins, Ron. “Congress Writes a Law: Research and Welfare Reform.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 10 (1991): 616–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, H. Hugh. “Policy Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 2 (January 1972): 83–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hird, John A. “The Political Economy of Pork: Project Selection at the United States Army Corps of Engineers.” American Political Science Review 85 (Spring 1991)Google Scholar
Hird, John A. Power, Knowledge and Politics: Policy Analysis in the States. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2005Google Scholar
Hochschild, Jennifer. What’s Fair? American Beliefs about Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Patashnik, Eric M., eds. Living Legislation: Durability, Change, and the Politics of American Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2012Google Scholar
Jones, Charles O. “Why Congress Can’t Do Policy Analysis (or words to that effect).” Policy Analysis 2 (1976): 251–164Google Scholar
Joyce, Philip G. The Congressional Budget Office: Honest Numbers, Power, and Policymaking. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, Ira and Lapinski, John S.. “At the Crossroads: Congress and American Political Development.” Perspectives on Politics 4 (2006): 243–260Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd edition. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1991Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. “Interests, Constituencies, and Policy Making,” in Quirk, Paul J. and Binder, Sarah A, eds., The Legislative Branch. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances E. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2009Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. “American politics is more competitive than ever. That’s making partisanship worse.” Washington Post, January 9, 2014 (www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/01/09/american-politics-is-more-competitive-than-ever-thats-making-partisanship-worse/)Google Scholar
Light, Paul C. Government’s Greatest Achievements: From Civil Rights to Homeland Security. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. “The Science of ‘Muddling Through.’” Public Administration Review 19 (Spring 1959): 79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest and Shipan, Charles R.. “Continuity, Change and the Evolution of the Law.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (April 2008): 252–267Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J.. It’s Even Worse than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books, 2012Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. “Congress as Problem Solver,” in Gerber, Alan and Patashnik, Eric M., eds., Promoting the General Welfare: New Perspectives on Government Performance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2006Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. “Is Congress ‘the Broken Branch’?” Boston University Law Review 89 (2009): 357–369Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. “Lawmaking as a Cognitive Enterprise,” in Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Patashnik, Eric M., eds., Living Legislation: Durability, Change, and the Politics of American Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltsner, Arnold. Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry M. “The Politicized Presidency,” in Chubb, John E. and Peterson, Paul E., eds., The New Direction in American Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1985Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. and Wilson, Scott A.. “Presidents and the Politics of Structure.” Law and Contemporary Problems 57 (1994): 1–44Google Scholar
Mucciaroni, Gary and Quirk, Paul J.. Deliberative Choices: Debating Public Policy in Congress. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2006Google Scholar
Nivola, Pietro S. and Brady, David W.. Red and Blue Nation?: Consequences and Correction of America’s Polarized Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008Google Scholar
Patashnik, Eric M. Reforms at Risk: What Happens after Major Policy Changes Are Enacted. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patashnik, Eric M. and Zelizer, Julian E.. “The Struggle to Remake Politics: Liberal Reform and the Limits of Policy Feedback in the Contemporary American State.” Perspectives on Politics (December 2013)Google Scholar
Peterson, Mark A. “How Health Policy Information Is Used in Congress,” in Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J., eds., Intensive Care: How Congress Shapes Health Policy. Washington, DC: AEI and Brookings Institution, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45.4 (1993): 595–628Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. “Policy Analysis and Congress.” Public Policy XVIII (Fall 1969), 61–74Google Scholar
Pressman, Jeffrey L. and Wildavsky, Aaron. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; Or, Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation of Ruined Hopes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, David E. “Professionals and ‘Entrepreneurs’: Staff Orientations and Policymaking on Three Separate Committees.” Journal of Politics 33 (1971): 316–336Google Scholar
Price, David E. “Comment,” in Robinson, William H. and Wellborn, Clay, eds., Knowledge, Power and the Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1991Google Scholar
Quirk, Paul J. “Deliberation and Decision Making,” in Quirk, Paul J. and Binder, Sarah A., eds., The Legislative Branch. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005Google Scholar
Quirk, Paul J. and Bendix, William. “Deliberation in Congress,” in Schickler, Eric, Lee, Frances E. and Edwards, George C., eds., The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011Google Scholar
Quirk, Paul J. and Binder, Sarah A., eds. The Legislative Branch. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005Google Scholar
Radin, Beryl A. Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000Google Scholar
Rhodes, R.W., Binder, Sarah A., and Rockman, Bert, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006Google Scholar
Rieselbach, Leroy N. Congressional Reform: The Changing Modern Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1994Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. “Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process,” PS: Political Science and Politics 24 (June 1991): 147–156Google Scholar
Schick, Allen. “The Supply and Demand for Policy Analysis on Capitol Hill.” Policy Analysis (Spring 1976): 215–234Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric, Lee, Frances E., and Edwards, George C., eds. The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter H. Why Government Fails so Often and How It Can Do Better. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. “Representation and Governance: The Great Legislative Trade-off.” Political Science Quarterly 103 (1988): 461–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. “Congress is a ‘They, Not an ‘It’”: Legislative Intent as Oxymoron.” International Review of Law and Economics 12 (1992): 239–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R. and Volden, Craig, “Policy Diffusion: Seven Lessons for Scholars and Practitioners.” Public Administration Review (November/December 2012): 782–7963.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulock, Nancy. “The Paradox of Policy Analysis: If It Is Not Used, Why Do We Produce So Much Of It.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 18 (1999): 226–244Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. Boomerang: Clinton’s Health Security Effort and the Turn against Government in U.S. Politics. New York: W.W. Norton, 1996Google Scholar
Stokey, Edith and Zeckhauser, Richard J.. A Primer for Policy Anlaysis. New York: HarperCollins, 1978Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making, 3rd edition. New York: W.W. Norton, 2001Google Scholar
Summers, Lawrence. “To Fix the Economy, fix the housing market.” Reuters, October 24, 2011 (http://blogs.reuters.com/lawrencesummers/2011/10/24/to-fix-the-economy-fix-the-housing-market.html)Google Scholar
Sundquist, James L. The Decline and Resurgence of Congress. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. “Beyond the Republican Revival.” Yale Law Journal 97 (1988): 1539–1590Google Scholar
Taylor, Andrew J. Congress: A Performance Appraisal. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanDoren, Peter. “Should Congress Listen to Economists?” Journal of Politics 51 (May 1989): 319–336Google Scholar
Verdier, James M. “Advising Congressional Decision-Makers: Guidelines for Economists.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 3 (1984): 421–438Google Scholar
Vining, Aidan R. and Weimer, David L.. “Policy Analysis,” Foundations of Public Administration Series, 2010 (www.aspanet.org/scriptcontent/index_par_foundationsseries.cfm)Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent. Ending Welfare As We Know It. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2000Google Scholar
Weimer, David L. and Vining, Aidan R.. Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 3rd edition. New York: Prentice Hall, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Carol H. “Congressional Committees as Users of Analysis.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 8 (1989): 411–431Google Scholar
Wellman, Michael and Dertick, Martha. Formulation of Trade-Offs in Planning under Uncertainty. New York: Elsevier Science and Technology Books, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteman, David. “The Fate of Policy Analysis in Congressional Decision Making: Three Types of Use in Committees.” Western Political Quarterly (June 1985): 294–311Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. New York: Little, Brown, 1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. “The Study of Administration.” Political Science Quarterly 2 (1887): 197–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, John R. Interest Groups and Congress: Lobbying, Contributions, and Influence. New York: Longman Publishing, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992Google Scholar
Zelizer, Julian E. Taxing America: Wilbur Mills, Congress, and the State, 1945–1975. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998Google Scholar
References
Arnold, R. Douglas (1990). The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bass, Paul (2013). “Malloy: ‘This Is Climate Change.’” New Haven Independent. www.newhavenindependent.org/index.php/archives/entry/this_is_climate_change/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam (2009). In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam (2012). “Rumors, Truths, and Reality: A Study of Political Misinformation.” Cambridge MA, MIT, Political Science Department. web.mit.edu/berinsky/www/les/rumor.pdf.Google Scholar
Bloomberg, Michael (2012). “A Vote for a President to Lead on Climate Change.” Bloomberg.com. www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-01/a-vote-for-a-president-to-lead-on-climate-change.html.Google Scholar
Boxall, Bettina and Banerjee, Neela (2012). “Sandy a Galvanizing Moment for Climate Change.” Los Angeles Times. November 4.Google Scholar
Brixi, Hana, et al., eds. (2004). Tax Expenditures – Shedding Light on Government Spending through the Tax System: Lessons from Developed and Transition Economies. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Andrea (2003). How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, Dennis and Druckman, James (2010). “Dynamic Public Opinion: Communication Effects over Time.” American Political Science Review 104(4): 663–680.Google Scholar
City of New York (2013). “Mayor Bloomberg Details Progress on Resiliency Projects Outlined in the City’s Long-Term Plan to Protect City against the Effects of Climate Change on Hurricane Sandy Anniversary.” www1.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/348-13/mayor-bloomberg-details-progress-resiliency-projects-outlined-the-city-s-long-term-plan-to/#/0.Google Scholar
Clark, Christopher (2013). The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Climate Preparedness Task Force (2013). “Climate Ready Boston: Municipal Vulnerability to Climate Change.” www.cityofboston.gov/news/uploads/30044_50_29_58.pdf.Google Scholar
Community Services Administration (n.d.). “New Haven’s Elm City Resident Card: My City. My Card.” www.cityofnewhaven.com/csa/newhavenresidents/.Google Scholar
Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (2013). “Connecticut Climate Preparedness Plan.” www.ct.gov/deep/cwp/view.asp?a=4423&Q=528012&deepNav_GID=2121.Google Scholar
Environmental and Energy Study Institute (2013). “Public Perceptions about Global Warming and Government Involvement in the Issue.” www.eesi.org/032813polls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, David and Friedland, Zoe (2014). “How Often Do States Study Each Other? Evidence of Policy Knowledge Diffusion.” American Politics Research 42 (6): 956–985.Google Scholar
Gray, Louise (2011). “Flooding at Home, Not Polar Bears, Convinces People of Man-Made Climate Change.” The Telegraph. March 21.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, et al. (2004). Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identity of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulasekaram, Pratheepan and Ramakrishnan, S. Karthick (2015). The New Immigration Federalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hartman, Todd and Newmark, Adam (2012). “Motivated Reasoning, Political Sophistication, and Associations between President Obama and Islam.” PS: Political Science and Politics (July): 449–455.Google Scholar
Hayes, Danny (2013). “Why This Gun Control Debate Has Been Different.” Wonkblog. www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/28/why-this-gun-control-debate-has-been-different/.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Jennifer (2013). Dynamics of International Migration: Will Demography Change Politics before Politics Impedes Demographic Change? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Department of Government.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Jennifer and Burch, Traci (2009). “Contingent Public Policies and Racial Hierarchy: Lessons from Immigration and Census Policies.” In Political Contingency: Studying the Unexpected, the Accidental, and the Unforeseen, eds. Shapiro, Ian and Bedi, Sonu. New York: New York University Press, 138–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Jennifer and Einstein, Katherine Levine (2015). Do Facts Matter? Information and Misinformation in American Politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Jennifer, et al. (2012). Creating a New Racial Order: How Immigration, Multiracialism, Genomics, and the Young Can Remake Race in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Christopher (1999). The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Gregory (2009). “Contingency, Politics, and the Nature of Inquiry: Why Non-Events Matter.” In Political Contingency: Studying the Unexpected, the Accidental, and the Unforeseen, eds. Shapiro, Ian and Bedi, Sonu. New York: New York University Press, 205–221.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira (2013). Fear Itself: The New Deal and the Origins of Our Time. New York: Liveright Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank (1921). Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklinski, James, et al. (2000). “Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship.” Journal of Politics 62 (3): 791–816.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Howard (2012). “Some Pro-Gun Voices Now Changing Their View.” Daily Beast. www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/12/17/some-pro-gun-voices-now-changing-their-view.html.Google Scholar
Langer, Gary (2010). “This I Believe.” ABC News Online. blogs.abcnews.com/thenumbers/2010/08/this-i-believe.html.Google Scholar
Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence (2013). “2013 State Scorecard: Why Gun Laws Matter.” www.bradycampaign.org/sites/default/files/2013-scorecard.pdf.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey et al. (2009). A Muslim President? Assessing the Causes and Consequences of Misperceptions about Barack Obama’s Faith in the 2008 Presidential Election. Toronto, Ontario: Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton and Taber, Charles (2013). The Rationalizing Voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lowrey, Annie (2014). “Cities Advance Their Fight against Rising Inequality.” New York Times. April 6 p.A1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane (1986). Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David (1974). Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David (2005). “Wars and American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (3): 473–493.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David (2009). “Events as Causes: The Case of American Politics.” In Political Contingency: Studying the Unexpected, the Accidental, and the Unforeseen., eds. Shapiro, Ian and Bedi, Sonu. New York: New York University Press, 99–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David (2010). “Legislative Obstruction.” Perspectives on Politics 8(4): 1145–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne (2011). The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
National Hurricane Center (2011). “The Deadliest, Costliest, and Most Intense United States Tropical Cyclones from 1851 to 2010 (and Other Frequently Requested Hurricane Facts).”Google Scholar
National Hurricane Center (2013). “Hurricane Sandy: October 22–29, 2012 (Tropical Cyclone Report).”Google Scholar
News Watch (2012). “C40 Chair, New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg: ‘Cities Are Forging Ahead.’” newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2012/03/14/c40-chair-new-york-city-mayor-michael-r-bloomberg-cities-are-forging-ahead/.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan (2010). “Pundits Blame the Victims on Obama Muslim Myth.” www.brendan-nyhan.com/blog/2010/08/pundits-blame-the-victims-on-obama-muslim-myth-.html.Google Scholar
Obama, Barack (2012). “Statement by the President on the School Shooting in Newtown, Ct.” www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/2012/12/14/president-obama-makes-statement-shooting-newtown-connecticut#.Google Scholar
Patashnik, Eric (2008). Reforms at Risk: What Happens after Major Policy Changes Are Enacted. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center for the People & the Press (2013) “If No Deal Is Struck, Four-in-Ten Say Let the Sequester Happen.” www.people-press.org/2013/02/21/section-1-opinions-about-major-issues/.Google Scholar
Raju, Manu (2013). “Heidi Heitkamp Defends Gun Vote.” Politico. www.politico.com/story/2013/04/heidi-heitkamp-defends-gun-vote-90600.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, James and Shapiro, Ian (2014). “Transforming Power Relationships: Leadership, Risk, and Hope.” American Political Science Review 18(1): 40–53.Google Scholar
Schedler, Adreas (2009). “Mapping Contingency.” In Political Contingency: Studying the Unexpected, the Accidental, and the Unforeseen, eds. Shapiro, Ian and Bedi, Sonu. New York: New York University Press, 54–78.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian and Bedi, Sonu, eds. (2009). Political Contingency: Studying the Unexpected, the Accidental, and the Unforeseen. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Shear, Michael (2014). “After Push by Obama, Minimum-Wage Action Is Moving to the States.” New York Times. April 2.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Kate (2013). “Could Chris Christie Bring the GOP around on Climate?” Mother Jones. www.motherjones.com/environment/2013/02/chris-christie-climate-change.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles and Volden, Craig (2008). “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 840–857.Google Scholar
Smith, David Thomas (c. 2010). The First Muslim President? Causes and Consequences of the Belief that Barack Obama Is a Muslim. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Department of Political Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, A. et al. (2011). “Perceptions of Climate Change and Willingness to Save Energy Related to Flood Experience.” Nature Climate Change 1(1): 46–49.Google Scholar
Stone, Clarence et al. (2001). Building Civic Capacity: The Politics of Reforming Urban Schools. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Varsanyi, Monica, ed. (2010). Taking Local Control: Immigration Policy Activism in U.S. Cities and States. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vielkind, Jimmy (2012). “Cuomo: ‘Climate Change Is a Reality… We Are Vulnerable.’” Capitol Confidential. blog.timesunion.com/capitol/archives/162798/cuomo-climate-change-is-a-reality-we-are-vulnerable/.Google Scholar
Walshe, Shushannah (2013). “Some States Propose Gun Control Law, Others Say No to Federal Proposals.” ABC News. January 19.Google Scholar
Wasow, Omar (2015). “Do Protest Tactics Matter? Effects of the 1960s Black Insurgency on White Attitudes and Voting Behavior.” Paper presented at the Center for the Study of Democratic Politics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, April 9.Google Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth (2009). “Modeling Contingency.” In Political Contingency: Studying the Unexpected, the Accidental, and the Unforeseen, eds. Shapiro, Ian and Bedi, Sonu. New York: New York University Press, 222–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
References
Aldrich, John and Rohde, David. 1998. Measuring Conditional Party Government. Manuscript: Midwest Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Alexander, DeAlva Stanwood. 1915 [1970]. History and Procedure of the House of Representatives. Franklin Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 1996. “The Partisan Basis of Procedural Choice: Allocating Parliamentary Rights in the House, 1789–1990.” American Political Science Review (1996): 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 1997. Minority Rights, Majority Rule: Partisanship and the Development of Congress. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. and Smith, Steven S.. 1997. Politics or Principle?: Filibustering in the United States Senate. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Chiu, Shi-Chang. 1928 [1968]. The Speaker of the House of Representatives Since 1896. AMS Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Joseph and Brady, David W.. 1981. “Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn.” American Political Science Review (1981): 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2007. Replication Data for: Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. Harvard Institute for Quantitative Political Science.Google Scholar
Dion, Douglas. 2001. Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew: Minority Rights and Procedural Change in Legislative Politics. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Thomas W. and Krehbiel, Keith. 1987. “Collective Decisionmaking and Standing Committees: An Informational Rationale for Restrictive Amendment Procedures.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3: 287–335.Google Scholar
Giuriato, Luisa. 2007. Combining Autocracy and Majority Voting: The Canonical Succession Rules of the Latin Church. Manuscript: University of Rome La Sapienza.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinberg, John Gilbert. 1926. “History of the Majority Principle.” American Political Science Review 20(1): 52–68.Google Scholar
Hinds, Asher C. 1899. Parliamentary Precedents of the House of Representatives of the United States. U.S. Government Printing Office.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Alex and Shotts, Kenneth. 2012. “Policy-Specific Information and Informal Agenda Power.” American Journal of Political Science 56: 67–83.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas and Washington, Henry Augustine. 1854. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Volume 8.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Stewart, Charles III. 2013. Fighting for the Speakership: The House and the Rise of Party Government. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, Alan. N.d. “Roberts Rules: Getting Comfortable with Parliamentary Procedure.” www.dummies.com/how-to/content/roberts-rules-getting-comfortable-with-parliamenta.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles O. 1968. “Joseph G. Cannon and Howard W. Smith: An Essay on the Limits of Leadership in the House of Representatives.” The Journal of Politics 30(3): 617–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koger, Gregory. 2010. Filibustering: A Political History of Obstruction in the House and Senate. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1985. “Obstruction and Representativeness in Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 29: 643–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2000. “Party Discipline and Measures of Partisanship.” American Journal of Political Science 43: 212–27.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2003a. “Asymmetry of Party Influence: Reply.” Political Analysis 11: 108–09.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2003b. “The Coefficient of Party Influence.” Political Analysis 11: 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2007. “Partisan Roll Rates in a Nonpartisan Legislature.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 23: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith and Meirowitz, Adam. 2002. “Minority Rights and Majority Power: Theoretical Consequences of the Motion to Recommit.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27(2): 191–217.Google Scholar
Malamut, Michael E. 2008. “Musings on General or Common Parliamentary Law.” Parliamentary Journal XLIX(3) July.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ober, Josiah. 2008. Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 1977. “The Rules Committee: New Arm of Leadership in a Decentralized House.” In Congress Reconsidered, vol. 1. Praeger Publishers, pp. 96–116.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, Bruce. 1994. “The House Traffic Cop: The Rules Committee.” In Silbey, Joel (ed.), Encyclopedia of the American Legislative System. Scribners, pp. 1049–66.Google Scholar
Park, Hong Min. 2013. Logit, Ordered Logit, and Multinomial Logit: A Case of Studying Rules Changes in the U.S. House. Manuscript: University of Alabama.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1968. “The Institutionalization of the US House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 62(1): 144–68.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, Kurt A., Ober, Josiah, and Wallace, Robert. 2007. Origins of Democracy in Ancient Greece. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Jason and Smith, Steven. 2003. “Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971–2000.” American Journal of Political Science 47: 305–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1974. “Committee Reform in the House of Representatives and the Subcommittee Bill of Rights.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 411(1): 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Thomas and Rosenthal, Howard. 1978. “Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo.” Public Choice 33: 27–43.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2000. “Institutional Change in the House of Representatives, 1867–1998: A Test of Partisan and Ideological Power Balance Models.” American Political Science Review 94(2): 269–288.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the US Congress. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2014. Counting the Many: The Origins and Limits of Supermajority Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1979. “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models.” American Journal of Political Science 23(1): 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” The American Political Science Review 81(1): 85–104.Google Scholar
Wawro, Gregory J. and Schickler, Eric. 2006. Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the US Senate. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. and Marshall, William J.. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets.” The Journal of Political Economy 96(1): 132–163.Google Scholar