Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-01T08:39:45.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The Congressional Incumbency Advantage over Sixty Years

Measurement, Trends, and Implications

from Part I - Political Representation and Democratic Accountability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2016

By
Robert S. Erikson
Edited by
Alan S. Gerber  and
Eric Schickler
Alan S. Gerber
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Eric Schickler
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Governing in a Polarized Age
Elections, Parties, and Political Representation in America
 , pp. 65 - 89
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, John R. and Hibbing, John R.. 1981. “Increased Incumbency Advantage in the House.” Journal of Politics 43: 1052–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, John R. and Brady, David W.. 1993. “Personal and Partisan Advantage in US Congressional Elections.” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds., Congress Reconsidered, 5th ed. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Ansolahebere, Stephen and Snyder, James M. Jr. 2000. “Money and Office: The Source of the Incumbency Advantage in Campaign Finance.” In Brady, David, Cogan, John, and Fiorina, Morris P., eds., Continuity and Change in House Elections. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ansolahebere, Stephen, Brady, David W., and Fiorina, Morris P.. 1988. “The Vanishing Marginals and Electoral Responsiveness.” British Journal of Political Science 22: 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolahebere, Stephen, Snyder, James M. Jr., and Stewart, Charles III. 2000. “Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 17–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Phillip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Phillip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1966. Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cover, Albert D. and Mayhew, David. 1977. “Congressional Dynamics and the Decline of Competitive Congressional Elections.” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds., Congress Reconsidered. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1996. “Why Did the Incumbency Advantage in US House Elections Grow?” American Journal of Political Science 40: 478–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2002. Elbridge Gerry’s Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert. 1971. “The Incumbency Advantage in Congressional Elections.” Polity 3: Spring, pp. 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert. 1972. “Malapportionment, Gerrymandering and Party Fortunes in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 65: December, pp. 1234–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. and Wright, Gerald C.. 2000. “Representation of Constituency Ideology in Congress.” In Brady, David, Cogan, John, and Fiorina, Morris, eds., Continuity and Change in Congressional Elections. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. and Titiunik, Rocio. 2015. “Using Regression Discontinuity to Uncover the Personal Incumbency Advantage.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10: 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. and Palfrey, Thomas R.. 1998. “Campaign Spending Effects and Incumbency: An Alternative Simultaneous Equations Approach.” Journal of Politics 60: May, pp. 355–373.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1977. “On the Decline in Competition in Congressional Elections. American Political Science Review 71: 166–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 1977. “The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did It.” American Political Science Review 71: 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Anthony and Hall, Andrew B.. 2014. “Disentangling the Personal and Partisan Incumbency Advantages: Evidence from Close Elections and Term Limits.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 9: 501–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew and King, Gary. 1990. “Estimating Incumbency Advantage without Bias.” American Journal of Political Science 34(4): 1142–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew and King, Gary. 1991. “Systemic Consequences of Incumbency Advantage in US House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 35: 110–138.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1987. “The Marginals Never Vanished: Incumbency and Competition in Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1952–1982. American Journal of Poltiical Science 31: 126–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2015. “ Its Nothing Personal: The Decline of the Incumbency Advantage in US House Elections.” Journal of Politics: 77: 861–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, David S. 2008. “Randomized Experiments from Non-random Selection in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Econometrics 142(2): 675–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, Steven D. and Wolfram, Catherine D.. 1997. “Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(1): 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974a. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974b. “Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals.” Polity 6: 3295–3317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan. 2010. “The Geographic Distribution of Political Preferences.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 297–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1973. “The Relationship between Seats and Votes in Two-Party Systems.” American Political Science Review 67: 549–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1998. “Politicians as Prize Fighters: Electoral Selection and Incumbency Advantage.” In Geer, John, ed., Party Politics and Politicians. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×