Book contents
- Governing in a Polarized Age
- Governing in a Polarized Age
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Political Representation and Democratic Accountability
- Part II Continuity and Change in Party Organizations
- Part III Partisanship and Governmental Performance
- 9 Polarized We Govern?
- 10 What Has Congress Done?
- 11 Can Congress Do Policy Analysis?
- 12 Studying Contingency Systematically
- 13 Majoritarianism, Majoritarian Tension, and the Reed Revolution
- Part IV Conclusions
- Index
- References
11 - Can Congress Do Policy Analysis?
The Politics of Problem Solving on Capitol Hill
from Part III - Partisanship and Governmental Performance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 October 2016
Book contents
- Governing in a Polarized Age
- Governing in a Polarized Age
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Political Representation and Democratic Accountability
- Part II Continuity and Change in Party Organizations
- Part III Partisanship and Governmental Performance
- 9 Polarized We Govern?
- 10 What Has Congress Done?
- 11 Can Congress Do Policy Analysis?
- 12 Studying Contingency Systematically
- 13 Majoritarianism, Majoritarian Tension, and the Reed Revolution
- Part IV Conclusions
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Governing in a Polarized AgeElections, Parties, and Political Representation in America, pp. 267 - 303Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Adler, E. Scott and Wilkerson, John D.. Congress and the Politics of Policymaking. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012Google Scholar
Arnold, R. Douglas. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990Google Scholar
Bardach, Eugene. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2009Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jones, Bryan D.. The Politics of Information: Problem Definition and the Course of Public Policy in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary. “A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 (1983): 371–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Christopher R., Burden, Barry C., and Howell, William G.. “After Enactment: The Lives and Deaths of Federal Programs.” American Journal of Political Science 54.1 (2010): 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimber, Bruce. “Information as a Factor in Congressional Politics.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16 (November 1991): 585–605Google Scholar
Bimber, Bruce. The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey E. The President’s Legislative Policy Agenda, 1789–2002. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012Google Scholar
Congress of the United States Congressional Budget Office. “Who Pays and When? An Assessment of Generational Accounting.” Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1995Google Scholar
Derthick, Martha and Quirk, Paul J.. The Politics of Deregulation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1985Google Scholar
Drutman, Lee and Teles, Steven M., “A New Agenda for Political Reform.” The Washington Monthly, May 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterling, Kevin. The Political Economy of Expertise: Information and Efficiency in American National Politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2004Google Scholar
Ellwood, John W. and Patashnik, Eric M.. “In Praise of Pork.” National Affairs 110 (1993): 19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Diana. Greasing the Wheels: Using Pork Barrel Projects to Build Majority Coalitions in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. New York: Longman, 1978Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. Defending Congress and the Constitution. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2011Google Scholar
Frankel, Jeffrey A. and Orszag, Peter R.. American Economic Policy in the 1990s. Boston: MIT Press, 2002Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S. and Patashnik, Eric M., eds. Promoting the General Welfare: New Perspectives on Government Performance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2006Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S. and Patashnik, Eric M.. “Sham Surgery: The Problem of Inadequate Medical Evidence,” in Gerber, Alan S. and Patashnik, Eric M., eds., Promoting the General Welfare: New Perspectives on Government Performance. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S. and Patashnik, Eric M.. “The Politicization of Evidence-Based Medicine: The Limits of Pragmatic Problem Solving in an Era of Polarization.” California Journal of Politics and Policy 3.4 (2011)Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012Google Scholar
Haberkorn, Jennifer. “Eric Cantor Pledges another Obamacare Repeal Vote.” Politico, May 3, 2013 (www.politico.com/story/2013/05/obamacare-repeal-vote-eric-cantor-90900.html)Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. and Pierson, Paul. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer – and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard L. and Deardorff, Alan V., “Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy,” American Political Science Review, 100.1 (February 2006): 69–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskins, Ron. “Congress Writes a Law: Research and Welfare Reform.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 10 (1991): 616–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, H. Hugh. “Policy Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 2 (January 1972): 83–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hird, John A. “The Political Economy of Pork: Project Selection at the United States Army Corps of Engineers.” American Political Science Review 85 (Spring 1991)Google Scholar
Hird, John A. Power, Knowledge and Politics: Policy Analysis in the States. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2005Google Scholar
Hochschild, Jennifer. What’s Fair? American Beliefs about Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Patashnik, Eric M., eds. Living Legislation: Durability, Change, and the Politics of American Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2012Google Scholar
Jones, Charles O. “Why Congress Can’t Do Policy Analysis (or words to that effect).” Policy Analysis 2 (1976): 251–164Google Scholar
Joyce, Philip G. The Congressional Budget Office: Honest Numbers, Power, and Policymaking. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, Ira and Lapinski, John S.. “At the Crossroads: Congress and American Political Development.” Perspectives on Politics 4 (2006): 243–260Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd edition. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1991Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. “Interests, Constituencies, and Policy Making,” in Quirk, Paul J. and Binder, Sarah A, eds., The Legislative Branch. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances E. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2009Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. “American politics is more competitive than ever. That’s making partisanship worse.” Washington Post, January 9, 2014 (www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/01/09/american-politics-is-more-competitive-than-ever-thats-making-partisanship-worse/)Google Scholar
Light, Paul C. Government’s Greatest Achievements: From Civil Rights to Homeland Security. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. “The Science of ‘Muddling Through.’” Public Administration Review 19 (Spring 1959): 79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest and Shipan, Charles R.. “Continuity, Change and the Evolution of the Law.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (April 2008): 252–267Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J.. It’s Even Worse than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books, 2012Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. “Congress as Problem Solver,” in Gerber, Alan and Patashnik, Eric M., eds., Promoting the General Welfare: New Perspectives on Government Performance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2006Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. “Is Congress ‘the Broken Branch’?” Boston University Law Review 89 (2009): 357–369Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. “Lawmaking as a Cognitive Enterprise,” in Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Patashnik, Eric M., eds., Living Legislation: Durability, Change, and the Politics of American Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltsner, Arnold. Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry M. “The Politicized Presidency,” in Chubb, John E. and Peterson, Paul E., eds., The New Direction in American Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1985Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. and Wilson, Scott A.. “Presidents and the Politics of Structure.” Law and Contemporary Problems 57 (1994): 1–44Google Scholar
Mucciaroni, Gary and Quirk, Paul J.. Deliberative Choices: Debating Public Policy in Congress. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2006Google Scholar
Nivola, Pietro S. and Brady, David W.. Red and Blue Nation?: Consequences and Correction of America’s Polarized Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008Google Scholar
Patashnik, Eric M. Reforms at Risk: What Happens after Major Policy Changes Are Enacted. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patashnik, Eric M. and Zelizer, Julian E.. “The Struggle to Remake Politics: Liberal Reform and the Limits of Policy Feedback in the Contemporary American State.” Perspectives on Politics (December 2013)Google Scholar
Peterson, Mark A. “How Health Policy Information Is Used in Congress,” in Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J., eds., Intensive Care: How Congress Shapes Health Policy. Washington, DC: AEI and Brookings Institution, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45.4 (1993): 595–628Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. “Policy Analysis and Congress.” Public Policy XVIII (Fall 1969), 61–74Google Scholar
Pressman, Jeffrey L. and Wildavsky, Aaron. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; Or, Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation of Ruined Hopes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, David E. “Professionals and ‘Entrepreneurs’: Staff Orientations and Policymaking on Three Separate Committees.” Journal of Politics 33 (1971): 316–336Google Scholar
Price, David E. “Comment,” in Robinson, William H. and Wellborn, Clay, eds., Knowledge, Power and the Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1991Google Scholar
Quirk, Paul J. “Deliberation and Decision Making,” in Quirk, Paul J. and Binder, Sarah A., eds., The Legislative Branch. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005Google Scholar
Quirk, Paul J. and Bendix, William. “Deliberation in Congress,” in Schickler, Eric, Lee, Frances E. and Edwards, George C., eds., The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011Google Scholar
Quirk, Paul J. and Binder, Sarah A., eds. The Legislative Branch. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005Google Scholar
Radin, Beryl A. Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000Google Scholar
Rhodes, R.W., Binder, Sarah A., and Rockman, Bert, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006Google Scholar
Rieselbach, Leroy N. Congressional Reform: The Changing Modern Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1994Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. “Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process,” PS: Political Science and Politics 24 (June 1991): 147–156Google Scholar
Schick, Allen. “The Supply and Demand for Policy Analysis on Capitol Hill.” Policy Analysis (Spring 1976): 215–234Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric, Lee, Frances E., and Edwards, George C., eds. The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter H. Why Government Fails so Often and How It Can Do Better. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. “Representation and Governance: The Great Legislative Trade-off.” Political Science Quarterly 103 (1988): 461–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. “Congress is a ‘They, Not an ‘It’”: Legislative Intent as Oxymoron.” International Review of Law and Economics 12 (1992): 239–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R. and Volden, Craig, “Policy Diffusion: Seven Lessons for Scholars and Practitioners.” Public Administration Review (November/December 2012): 782–7963.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulock, Nancy. “The Paradox of Policy Analysis: If It Is Not Used, Why Do We Produce So Much Of It.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 18 (1999): 226–244Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. Boomerang: Clinton’s Health Security Effort and the Turn against Government in U.S. Politics. New York: W.W. Norton, 1996Google Scholar
Stokey, Edith and Zeckhauser, Richard J.. A Primer for Policy Anlaysis. New York: HarperCollins, 1978Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making, 3rd edition. New York: W.W. Norton, 2001Google Scholar
Summers, Lawrence. “To Fix the Economy, fix the housing market.” Reuters, October 24, 2011 (http://blogs.reuters.com/lawrencesummers/2011/10/24/to-fix-the-economy-fix-the-housing-market.html)Google Scholar
Sundquist, James L. The Decline and Resurgence of Congress. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. “Beyond the Republican Revival.” Yale Law Journal 97 (1988): 1539–1590Google Scholar
Taylor, Andrew J. Congress: A Performance Appraisal. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanDoren, Peter. “Should Congress Listen to Economists?” Journal of Politics 51 (May 1989): 319–336Google Scholar
Verdier, James M. “Advising Congressional Decision-Makers: Guidelines for Economists.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 3 (1984): 421–438Google Scholar
Vining, Aidan R. and Weimer, David L.. “Policy Analysis,” Foundations of Public Administration Series, 2010 (www.aspanet.org/scriptcontent/index_par_foundationsseries.cfm)Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent. Ending Welfare As We Know It. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2000Google Scholar
Weimer, David L. and Vining, Aidan R.. Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 3rd edition. New York: Prentice Hall, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Carol H. “Congressional Committees as Users of Analysis.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 8 (1989): 411–431Google Scholar
Wellman, Michael and Dertick, Martha. Formulation of Trade-Offs in Planning under Uncertainty. New York: Elsevier Science and Technology Books, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteman, David. “The Fate of Policy Analysis in Congressional Decision Making: Three Types of Use in Committees.” Western Political Quarterly (June 1985): 294–311Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. New York: Little, Brown, 1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. “The Study of Administration.” Political Science Quarterly 2 (1887): 197–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, John R. Interest Groups and Congress: Lobbying, Contributions, and Influence. New York: Longman Publishing, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992Google Scholar
Zelizer, Julian E. Taxing America: Wilbur Mills, Congress, and the State, 1945–1975. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by