Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T15:32:12.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Effects of globalization on freshwater systems and strategies for conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

By
Jessica Seares ,
Katherine Smith ,
Elizabeth Anderson  and
Catherine Pringle
Edited by
William W. Taylor ,
Michael G. Schechter  and
Lois G. Wolfson
Jessica Seares
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Studies Emory University Math & Science Center, Suite E510 400 Dowman Drive Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
Katherine Smith
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology University of Georgia Ecology Building Athens, GA 30602 USA
Elizabeth Anderson
Affiliation:
Global Water for Sustainability Program Department of Environmental Studies Florida International University 11200 SW 8th Street, ECS 347 Miami, FL 33199 USA
Catherine Pringle
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology University of Georgia Ecology Building Athens, GA 30602 USA
William W. Taylor
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Michael G. Schechter
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Lois G. Wolfson
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Though the effects of globalization on marine systems (i.e., commercial fisheries) have received relatively more attention, freshwater ecosystems have been and continue to be profoundly affected by increasing human populations and changing global processes. Human activities now utilize more than half of the available surface fresh water (Postel 1999), and water consumption is doubling every 20 years (WWI 2003). Currently, four out of every ten persons live in river basins that experience water scarcity and it is estimated that by 2025, at least 50 percent of the world's population will face water scarcity (WRI 2000). The ecological effects of this demand on freshwater systems are already apparent. Biodiversity of freshwater ecosystems has declined by 50 percent globally over the 30-year period from 1970 to 1999 and current extinction rates of many freshwater taxa are more than 1000 times the normal “background” rate (Master et al. 1998). The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has recognized that globalization, specifically the liberalization of trade and the promotion of markets and investment structures, is likely to have a large but uncertain impact on water resources (OECD 1998). These conditions illustrate the need for continued analysis of how globalization and associated policies drive environmental change in freshwater ecosystems.

“Globalization” is a nebulous concept, with different meanings for different people. Here, we limit our definition to the post-World War II era of transnational legal frameworks designed with the intention of reducing trade barriers between nations (International Forum on Globalization 2002) and the era of multinational corporate expansion (Korten 2001).

Type
Chapter
Information
Globalization: Effects on Fisheries Resources , pp. 75 - 91
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alexander, R. B., Smith, R. A., and Schwarz, G. E. 2000. Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of México. Nature 403: 758–761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altieri, M. 2002. Agroecology: the science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 93: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, M. 2005. Privatización de la generación eléctrica: el asalto del siglo. Ambientico 137: 8–10.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. 2002. Electricity sector reform means more dams for Costa Rica. World Rivers Review 17: 3.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. P., Freeman, M. C., and Pringle, C. M. 2006. Ecological consequences of hydropower development in Central America: impacts of small dams and water diversion on neotropical stream fish assemblages. River Research and Applications 22: 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aparicio, E., Vargas, M. J., Olmo, J. M., and Sosota, A. 2000. Decline of native freshwater fishes in a Mediterranean watershed on the Iberian Peninsula: a quantitative assessment. Environmental Biology of Fishes 59: 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, J. 1991. Uso, Manejo y Riesgos Associados a Plaguicidas en Nicaragua. Managua, Nicaragua: Proyecto Regional de Plaguicidas, Confederación Universitaria Centroamericana.Google Scholar
Bank Information Center. 2004. About the Bank Information Center. Available online at www.bicusa.org/bicusa/issues/about_the_bank_information_center/index.php
Barlow, M. 2002. Water incorporated: the commodification of the world's water. Earth Island Journal. Available online at www.globalpolicy.org/globaliz/special/2002/0305water.htm
Barrett, G. W. 1968. The effects of an acute insecticide stress on a semi-enclosed grassland ecosystem. Ecology 49: 1019–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, E. 2004. W. T. O. Rules Against U.S. on cotton subsidies. New York Times April 27, 2004.
Bellaire, L. and Dubois, C. 1997. Distribution of thiabendazole-resistant Colletotrichum musae isolates from Guadeloupe banana plantations. Plant Disease 81: 1378–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benke, A. C. 1990. A perspective on America's vanishing streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 9: 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benstead, J. P., March, J. G., Pringle, C. M., and Scatena, F. N. 1999. Effects of a low-head dam and water abstraction on migratory tropical stream biota. Ecological Applications 9: 656–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boer, J. and Wester, P. G. 1993. Determination of toxaphene in human milk from Nicaragua and in fish and marine mammals from the Northeastern Atlantic and the North Sea. Chemosphere 27: 1879–1890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgues Arrea, I. 2005. Inventario de Proyectos de Infraestructura en Mesoamérica. Conservation Strategy Fund, Proyecto: Integración de la Infraestructura y la Conservación de la Biodiversidad en Mesoamérica. Curridabat, Costa Rica: Fondo de Alianzas para los Ecosistemas Críticos, The Nature Conservancy, Conservation Strategy Fund.Google Scholar
Calder, J. and Lee, J. 1995: ICE Case studies: Aral Sea and defense issues. Inventory on Conflict and the Environment. Available online at www.american.edu/TED/ice/aralsea.htm
Calero, S., Fomsgaard, I., Lacayo, M. L., Martinex, V., and Rugama, R. 1993. Toxaphene and other organochlorine pesticides in fish and sediment from Lake Xolotlan, Nicaragua. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 53: 297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Environmental Law Association. 2004. Great Lakes Water Management Initiative. Available online at www.cglg.org
Cangelosi, A. 2001. Sustainable use of Great Lakes water: the diversion threat's silver-lining? Available online at www.nemw.org/ERGLwaterdivert.htm
Carvalho, F. P., Montenegro-Guillen, S., Villeneuve, J. P., et al. 2003. Toxaphene residues from cotton fields in soils and in the coastal environment of Nicaragua. Chemosphere 53: 627–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CEPAL (Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe). 2005. Istmo Centroamericano: Estadísticas del Subsector Eléctrico. Available online at www.cepal.org/publications
Coes, D. V. 1998. Beyond privatization: getting the rules right in Latin America's regulatory environment. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 38: 525–532.Google Scholar
Cooper, K. and Miller, S. 2001. Selling our water: water taking in Lake Superior. Intervenor 23(2): 12.Google Scholar
Council of Great Lakes Governors. 2001. Great Lakes Water Management Initiative Overview. Available online at www.cglg.org/1projects/water/overview.asp
Diaz, R. J. and Rosenberg, R. 1995. Marine benthic hypoxia: a review of its ecological effects and the behavioral responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanography and Marine Biology 33: 245–303.Google Scholar
Dudgeon, D. 2002. An inventory of riverine biodiversity in monsoonal Asia: present status and conservation challenges. Water Science and Technology 45(11): 11–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunkerley, J. 1995. Financing the energy sector in developing countries. Energy Policy 23: 929–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duran, O. 2005. La estafa legal de la energía privada. Ambientico 137: 11–14.Google Scholar
ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). 1996. Progress in the Privatization of Water-Related Public Services: A Country-by-Country Review for Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean. Santiago, Chile: Environment and Development Division, ECLAC.
Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
French, H. 2000. Saving the Planet in the Age of Globalization. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Gleick, P. 1992. Environmental consequences of hydroelectric development: the role of facility size and type. Energy 17: 735–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleick, P. 1993. Water in Crisis: A Guide to the World's Fresh Water Resources. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gleick, P. 1998. The World's Water: The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources 1998–1999. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Gleick, P., Wolff, G., Chalecki, E. L., and Reyes, R. 2002. The New Economy of Water. Hayward, CA: Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, E. and Mander, J. 1996. The Case against Globalization and for a Turn to Localization. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club.Google Scholar
Gould, K. A., Lewis, T. L., and Roberts, J. T. 2004. Blue–Green coalitions: constraints and possibilities in the post 9–11 political environment. Journal of World-Systems Research 10: 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingco, S. P. 1996. Structural changes in the power sector in Asia. Energy Policy 24: 723–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Forum on Globalization. 2002. Alternatives to Economic Globalization: A Better World is Possible. San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler.
Izaguirre, A. K. 2000. Private Participation in Energy, Note No. 208. Washington, DC: Private Sector and Infrastructure Network, The World Bank Group.Google Scholar
Joseph, T. 2001. Decolonization in the era of globalization: the independence experience of St. Lucia. D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, UK.
Jude, D. J. and Pappas, J. 1992. Fish utilization of Great Lakes coastal wetlands. Journal of Great Lakes Research 18: 651–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karliner, J. 1997. The Corporate Planet: Ecology and Politics in the Age of Globalization. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club.Google Scholar
Kiely, R. and Marfleet, P. 1998. Globalization and the Third World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kimbrell, A. 2002. Fatal Harvest: The Tragedy of Industrial Agriculture. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Korten, D. C. 2001. When Corporations Rule the World. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Lemly, A. D., Kingsford, R. T., and Thompson, J. R. 2000. Irrigated agriculture and wildlife conservation: conflict on a global scale. Environmental Management 25: 485–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ljung, P. 2001. Trends in the Financing of Water and Energy Resource Projects, Thematic Review Paper III.2. Cape Town, South Africa: World Commission on Dams.Google Scholar
Majot, J. 1997. Beyond Big Dams: A New Approach to Energy Sector and Watershed Planning. Berkeley, CA: International Rivers Network.Google Scholar
Master, L. L., Flack, S. R., and Stein, B. A. 1998. Rivers of Life: Critical Watersheds for Protecting Freshwater Biodiversity, special publication of the Nature Conservancy. Arlington, VA: NatureServe.Google Scholar
McDonald, L., Jebellie, S. J., Madramootoo, C. A., and Todds, G. T. 1999. Pesticide mobility on a hillside soil in St. Lucia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 72: 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, S. R., Johnson, K. A., Weisskopf, C. R., et al. 1998. Avian exposure to pesticides in Costa Rican banana plantations. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 60: 562–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moskin, J. 2004. Helping third world one banana at a time. New York Times May 5, 2004.
Mungwena, W. 2002. Hydropower development on Zimbabwe's major dams. Renewable Energy 25: 455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1998. Water Consumption and Sustainable Water Resources Management. Paris: OECD Publications.
Parker, D. 2002. Privatization and neoliberalism: the European experience and the lessons for Latin America. In Globalization and Sustainable Development in Latin America, eds. Saha, S. K. and Parker, D.. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 51–77.Google Scholar
Pesticide Action Network. 2001. Cotton pesticides cause more deaths in Benin. Pesticide News June 2001: 12–14.
Pesticide Action Network. 2003. PAN pesticides database: California pesticide use. Available online at www.pesticideinfo.org
Postel, S. L. 1999. Pillar of Sand: Can the Irrigation Miracle Last?New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Postel, S. L. and Richter, B. 2004. Rivers for Life: Managing Water for People and Nature. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Pringle, C. M. 2000. Threats to U.S. public lands from cumulative hydrologic alterations outside of their boundaries. Ecological Applications 10: 971–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, C. M. 2001. Hydrologic connectivity and the management of biological reserves: a global perspective. Ecological Applications 11: 981–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, C. M. 2003. Interacting effects of altered hydrology and contaminant transport: emerging ecological patterns of global concern. In Achieving Sustainable Freshwater Systems: A Web of Connections, eds. Holland, M., Blood, E., and Shaffer, L.. Washington, DC: Island Press pp. 85–107.Google Scholar
Pringle, C. M., Freeman, M. C., and Freeman, B. J. 2000. Regional effects of hydrologic alterations on riverine macrobiota in the New World: tropical–temperate comparisons. BioScience 50: 807–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raphals, P. 2001. Restructured Rivers: Hydropower in The Era of Competitive Markets. Berkeley, CA: International Rivers Network.Google Scholar
Ritchie, M. 1999. Great Lakes water in danger from international trade laws. Detroit Free Press June 29, 1999. Available online at www.iatp.org
Rogers, P. 1991. Energy use in the developing world: a crisis of rising expectations. Environmental Science and Technology 25: 580–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, F. D. and Oliver, P. E. 1999. “From local to global” anti-dam movement in Brazil. Mobilization 4: 41–57.Google Scholar
Rouse, J. D., Bishop, C. A., and Struger, J. 1999. Nitrogen pollution: an assessment of its threat to amphibian survival. Environmental Health Perspectives 107: 799–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sassen, S. 1998. Globalization and Its Discontents: Essays on the New Mobility of People and Money. New York: New York Press.Google Scholar
Seares, J. 2004. From the local to the global: the ecology of agricultural development in St. Lucia, West Indies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Stokes, B. 2003. WTO: the cost of failing to change. National Journal 35(11): 839.Google Scholar
Stone, D. and Manrique, J. 2002. U.S. collaboration promotes integrated social development in Guatemala. Hydropower and Dams 2002(4): 102–104.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. 2003. Farm reform vital after WTO failure, says Beckett. The Independent (London) March 31, 2003.
Tilman, D. 1999. Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96: 5995–6000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization). 2001. Securing the Food Supply. Paris: UNESCO.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Government of Canada. 1995. The Great Lakes: An Environmental Atlas and Resource Book. Toronto, Ontario: Government of Canada and Chicago, IL: EPA.
Vandermeer, J. H., Perfecto, I., and Jody, M. Z. 1995. Breakfast of Biodiversity: The Truth about Rainforest Destruction. Oakland, CA: Institute for Food and Development Policy.Google Scholar
WCD (World Commission on Dams). 2000. Dams and Development: A Framework for Decision-Making. Available online at www.damsreport.org
WHO (World Health Organization). 1984. Camphechlor, Environmental Health Criteria 45. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
WRI (World Resources Institute). 2000. People and Ecosystems: The Fraying Web of Life. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
WWI (World Watch Institute). 2003. Vital Signs. Washington, DC: Worldwatch Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×