Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T03:13:10.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Tests of the AdS/CFT correspondence

from Part II - Gauge/Gravity Duality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Martin Ammon
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany
Johanna Erdmenger
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Munich
Get access

Summary

In the preceding chapter we introduced the conjectured duality of N = 4 Super Yang–Mills theory and IIB string theory on AdS5 × S5 as a map between the open and closed string pictures of D3-branes. As we explained, a proof of this duality would require a full non-perturbative understanding of quantised string theory in a curved space background. This is absent at present. This means that, to date, it is not possible to give a proof of the AdS/CFT correspondence.

Nevertheless, some very non-trivial tests of the conjectured duality are possible, for which observables are calculated on both sides and perfect agreement is found. Some of these tests are presented in this chapter. Generally, tests of the correspondence are possible for both the strong form and the weak form as defined in table 5.1, both of which require the N → ∞ limit on the field theory side to ensure a classical calculation on the gravity side. While tests for the strong form with the 't Hooft coupling λ fixed but arbitrary will be discussed in chapter 7, in this chapter we focus on tests for the weak form for which λ is taken to be large. This amounts to calculations in classical supergravity on the gravity side.

An important issue is that in the weak form, the AdS/CFT correspondence maps a quantum field theory in the strongly coupled regime to a gravity theory in the weakly coupled regime. In part III of this book, we will use this property to make non-trivial predictions for strongly coupled field theories which cannot be obtained by standard quantum field theory methods. However, for the tests considered here, our aim is to compare observables calculated perturbatively at weak coupling within quantum field theory to the same QFT observables calculated at strong coupling using the AdS/CFT correspondence. This implies that only calculations for observables independent of the coupling may be compared directly to each other.

Type
Chapter
Information
Gauge/Gravity Duality
Foundations and Applications
, pp. 219 - 239
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Lee, Sangmin, Minwalla, Shiraz, Rangamani, Mukund, and Seiberg, Nathan. 1998. Three-point functions of chiral operators in D = 4, N = 4 SYM at large N. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 697–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Freedman, Daniel Z., Mathur, Samir D., Matusis, Alec, and Rastelli, Leonardo. 1999. Correlation functions in the CFTd/AdS correspondence. Nucl. Phys., B546, 96–118.Google Scholar
[3] D'Hoker, Eric, Freedman, Daniel Z., Mathur, Samir D., Matusis, Alec, and Rastelli, Leonardo. 1999. Extremal correlators in the AdS/CFT correspondence. ArXiv:hep-th/9908160.
[4] Penrose, R., and Rindler, W. 1986. Spinors and Space-Time.Vol. 2: Spinor and Twistor Methods in Space-Time Geometry, Chapter 9. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Brown, J. David, and Henneaux, M. 1986. Central charges in the canonical realization of asymptotic symmetries: an example from three-dimensional gravity. Commun. Math. Phys., 104, 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Imbimbo, C., Schwimmer, A., Theisen, S., and Yankielowicz, S. 2000. Diffeomorphisms and holographic anomalies. Class. Quantum. Grav., 17, 1129–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] D'Hoker, Eric, and Freedman, Daniel Z. 2002. Supersymmetric gauge theories and the AdS/CFT correspondence. TASI 2001 School Proceedings. ArXiv:hepth/0201253. 3–158.
[8] Freedman, Daniel Z., Mathur, Samir D., Matusis, Alec, and Rastelli, Leonardo. 1999. Comments on four-point functions in the CFT/AdS correspondence. Phys. Lett., B452, 61–68.Google Scholar
[9] Liu, Hong, and Tseytlin, Arkady A. 1999. On four-point functions in the CFT/AdS correspondence. Phys. Rev., D59, 086002.Google Scholar
[10] D'Hoker, Eric, and Freedman, Daniel Z. 1999. Gauge boson exchange in AdSd+1. Nucl. Phys., B544, 612–632.Google Scholar
[11] D'Hoker, Eric, and Freedman, Daniel Z. 1999. General scalar exchange in AdS(d+1). Nucl. Phys., B550, 261–288.Google Scholar
[12] D'Hoker, Eric, Freedman, Daniel Z., Mathur, Samir D., Matusis, Alec, and Rastelli, Leonardo. 1999. Graviton exchange and complete four-point functions in the AdS/CFT correspondence. Nucl. Phys., B562, 353–394.Google Scholar
[13] D'Hoker, Eric, Freedman, Daniel Z., and Rastelli, Leonardo. 1999. AdS/CFT four-point functions: how to succeed at z integrals without really trying. Nucl. Phys., B562, 395–411.Google Scholar
[14] Arutyunov, G., and Frolov, S. 2000. Four-point functions of lowest weight CPO's in N = 4 SYM in supergravity approximation. Phys. Rev., D62, 064016.Google Scholar
[15] Erdmenger, J., and Perez-Victoria, M. 2000. Nonrenormalization of next-to-extremal correlators in N = 4 SYM and the AdS/CFT correspondence. Phys. Rev., D62, 045008.Google Scholar
[16] Liu, Hong, and Tseytlin, Arkady A. 1998. D = 4 Super Yang-Mills, D = 5 gauged supergravity, and D = 4 conformal supergravity. Nucl. Phys., B533, 88–108.Google Scholar
[17] Arutyunov, G., and Frolov, S. 1999. Three-point Green function of the stress energy tensor in the AdS/CFT correspondence. Phys. Rev., D60, 026004.Google Scholar
[18] Capper, D. M., and Duff, M. J. 1974. Trace anomalies in dimensional regularization. Nuovo Cimento, A23, 173–183.Google Scholar
[19] Christensen, S. M., and Duff, M. J. 1978. Axial and conformal anomalies for arbitrary spin in gravity and supergravity. Phys. Lett., B76, 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Henningson, M., and Skenderis, K. 1998. The holographic Weyl anomaly. J. High Energy Phys., 9807, 023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Henningson, M., and Skenderis, K. 2000. Holography and the Weyl anomaly. Fortschr. Phys., 48, 125–128.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] de Haro, Sebastian, Solodukhin, Sergey N., and Skenderis, Kostas. 2001. Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS/CFT correspondence. Commun. Math. Phys., 217, 595–622.Google Scholar
[23] Schwimmer, A., and Theisen, S. 2000. Diffeomorphisms, anomalies and the Fefferman-Graham ambiguity. J. High Energy Phys., 0008, 032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×