We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
from Part III - The Legal Framework for International Cooperation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 October 2018
INTRODUCTION
Obviously, close international cooperation is a fundamental key to a successful policy of asset recovery, as strong national powers of confiscation are significantly weakened if they cannot be enforced abroad. Technological developments (for example instant electronic transactions and banking) and the increasing internationalisation of society in general, render it absolute necessary that law enforcement agencies may investigate and search for assets across borders in an efficient and speedy way. The EU area is in this respect particularly vulnerable against the background of the free movement and the abolishment of internal border controls. Consequently, it is relatively easy for criminals to transfer and hide illegal proceeds in other Member States.
Various instruments on international cooperation in criminal matters have been adopted over the years. Some of them generally regulate the area of requests for legal assistance, whereas others are specifically drafted with respect to cooperation within asset recovery or regarding certain types of criminality. Traditionally, international cooperation in criminal matters is built upon the system of mutual legal assistance (“MLA”). Hereby a requesting State sends a formal request for legal assistance to a requested State, which will decide whether such a measure may be executed on the behalf of another State. It is based on reciprocity. Common grounds for refusal of such requests are, for example, a lack of double criminality, ordre public or exceptions for fiscal and political offences. Generally speaking, the regime of MLA is considered to be slow and cumbersome, as requests usually go through diplomatic channels or central authorities (often the Ministry of Justice). Even if there have been improvements in this area in recent years to facilitate the execution of requests and provide for faster procedures, many difficulties remain. Within the EU, some legal instruments have therefore been adopted in order to provide for improved and more advanced forms of MLA between the Member States. The international and EU instruments on MLA which may be applied for requests in the area of asset recovery will be described in Section 8.2.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
