Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:49:09.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Germanic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2023

Edited by
Jeffrey P. Williams
Jeffrey P. Williams
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Expressivity in European Languages , pp. 89 - 120
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Akita, Kimi. (2015). Sound symbolism. In Östman, Jan-Ola & Verschueren, Jef (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–24.Google Scholar
Abbi, Anvita. (1992). Reduplication in South Asian Languages: An areal, typological, and historical study. New Delhi: South Asia Books.Google Scholar
Akita, Kimi & Pardeshi, Prashant (eds.) (2019). Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterji, S. K. (1926). Origin and Development of the Bengali Language. Calcutta: Calcutta University Press.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. (2012). Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and linguistics compass 6(10), 654–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.361Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. (2015). Ideophones and reduplication: Depiction, description, and the interpretation of repeated talk in discourse. Studies in language 39(4), 946–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.4.05dinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. (2018). Redrawing the margins of language: Lessons from research on ideophones. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 3(1), 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.444Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. (1938). An echo-word motif in Dravidian folk-tales. Journal of the American Oriental Society 58(4): 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel. (2019). The Grammar of Expressivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John. (2019). Ideophones and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. (2017). Basque ideophones from a typological perspective. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62(2), 196–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2017.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon & Zoll, Cheryl. (2005). Reduplication: Doubling in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Noriko, Sells, Peter & Akita, Kimi (eds.) (2017). The Grammar of Japanese Mimetics: Perspectives from structure, acquisition, and translation. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J., Kimper, Wendell & Mullin, Kevin. (2012). Reduplication in Harmonic Serialism. Morphology 22, 173–232.Google Scholar
Mattiello, Elisa. (2013). Extra-Grammatical Morphology in English. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis. (2003). To be or not to be ideophonically impoverished. Texas Linguistics Forum 47: 131–42.Google Scholar
Robinson, Mairi (ed.) (1985). Concise Scots Dictionary. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Scripture, Edward Wheeler. (1902). Elements of Experimental Phonetics. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
Voeltz, F. K. Erhard & Kilian-Hatz, Christa (eds.) (2001). Ideophones. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Jeffrey P. (2004). Ecky-becky: Evidence of Scots echo word morphology in Barbadian English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 8: 163–70.Google Scholar
Williams, Jeffrey P. (ed.) (2021). Expressive Morphology in the Languages of South Asia. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, Jeffrey P. & Siu, Lap. (2014). The aesthetics of Jarai echo morphology. In Williams, J. P. (ed.) The Aesthetics of Grammar: Sound and meaning in the languages of Mainland Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 191–206.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira (1998). Identity avoidance in phonology and morphology. In Lapointe, Steven G. & Brentari, Diane K. (eds.) Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 216–46.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold & Pullum, Geoffrey (1987). Plain morphology and expressive morphology. In Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 330–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Barnes, K. R., Ebert, C., Hörnig, R., & Stender, T. (2022). The at-issue status of ideophones in German: An experimental approach. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics, 7(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5827Google Scholar
Barz, I. (2015). German. In Müller, P., Ohnheiser, I., Olsen, S. & Rainer, F. (eds.) Word-Formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe, Vol. 4: Word formation in the individual European languages. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2387–410.Google Scholar
Benczes, R. (2019). Rhyme over Reason: Phonological motivation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bücking, S. & Rau, J. (2013). German non-inflectional constructions as separate performatives. In Gutzmann, D. & Gärtner, H.-M. (eds.) Beyond Expressives: Explorations in use-conditional meaning. Leiden: Brill, 59–94.Google Scholar
Bzdȩga, Andrzej (1965). Reduplizierte Wortbildung im Deutschen. Poznań: Poznańskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. (2015). Ideophones and reduplication: Depiction, description, and the interpretation of repeated talk in discourse. Studies in Language 39(4), 946–70.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. (2018). Redrawing the margins of language: Lessons from research on ideophones. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 3(1), 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U. (2000). Extragrammatical vs. marginal phonology. In Doleschal, U. & Thornton, A. (eds.) Extragrammatical and Marginal Phonology. Munich: Lincom, 2–10.Google Scholar
Eitelmann, M. & Haumann, D. (2022) (eds.) Extravagant Morphology: Studies in rule-bending, pattern-extending and theory-challenging morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabb, N. (2015). What is Poetry? Language and memory in the poems of the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Féry, C. (1997). Uni und Studis: die besten Wörter des Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte (172), 461–89.Google Scholar
Finkbeiner, R. (2014). Identical constituent compounds in German. Word Structure 7(2), 182–213.Google Scholar
Fischer, O. (2011). Cognitive iconic grounding of reduplication in language. In Michelucci, P., Fischer, O., & Ljungberg, C. (eds.) Semblance and Signification. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Frankowsky, M. (2022). Extravagant expressions denoting quite normal entities. In Eitelmann, M. & Haumann, D. (eds.) Extravagant Morphology: Studies in rule-bending, pattern-extending and theory-challenging morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 155–79.Google Scholar
Freywald, U. (2015). Total reduplication as a productive process in German. Studies in Language. 39(4), 905–45.Google Scholar
Ghomeshi, J., Jackendoff, R., Rosen, N., & Russell, K. (2004). Contrastive focus reduplication in English (the salad-salad paper). Natural language & linguistic theory, 22(2), 307–57.Google Scholar
Görner, R. (2015). Ästhetik der Wiederholung. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.Google Scholar
Grüter, T. (2003). Hypocoristics: The case of u-formation in Bernese Swiss German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 15(1), 27–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohenhaus, P. (2004). Identical constituent compounding: A corpus-based study. Folia Linguistica 38(3–4), 297–331.Google Scholar
Horn, L. R. (2018). The lexical clone: Pragmatics, prototypes, productivity. In Finkbeiner, R. & Freywald, U. (eds.) Exact Repetition in Grammar and Discourse. Berlin: De Gruyter, 233–64.Google Scholar
Inkelas, S. & Zoll, C. (2005). Reduplication: Doubling in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. (ed.) Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 350–77.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D. (1996). Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive>. Language 72(3), 533–578..+Language+72(3),+533–578.>Google Scholar
Kentner, G. (2017). On the emergence of reduplication in German morphophonology. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 36(2), 233–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kentner, G. (2022). Do not repeat: Repetition and reduplication in German revisited. In Eitelmann, M. & Haumann, D. (eds.) Extravagant Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 181–205.Google Scholar
Kentner, G., Franz, I., & Menninghaus, W. (2022). Poetics of reduplicative word formation: Evidence from a rating and recall experiment. Language and Cognition 14(3), 333–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2021.27Google Scholar
Koch, P. & Oesterreicher, W. (1985). Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36(1), 15–43.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, S. & LaCharité, D. (2005). Less is more: Evidence from diminutive reduplication in Caribbean Creole languages. In Hurch, B. & Mattes, V. (eds.) Studies on Reduplication. Berlin: De Gruyter, 11–29.Google Scholar
Meibauer, J. (2007). How marginal are phrasal compounds? Generalized insertion, expressivity, and I/Q-interaction. Morphology, 17(2), 233–59.Google Scholar
Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., & Knoop, C. A. (2017). The emotional and aesthetic powers of parallelistic diction. Poetics 63, 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, C. (2007). The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2), 165–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regier, T. (1998). Reduplication and the arbitrariness of the sign. In Gernsbacher, M. A. & Derry, S. J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rubino, C. (2005). Reduplication: Form, function and distribution. In Hurch, B. & Mattes, V. (eds.) Studies on Reduplication. Berlin: De Gruyter, 11–29.Google Scholar
Saba Kirchner, J. (2010). Minimal reduplication. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Schindler, W. (1991). Reduplizierende Wortbildung im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 44(1–4), 595–611.Google Scholar
Stolz, T., Stroh, C., & Urdze, A. (2011): Total Reduplication: The areal linguistics of a potential universal. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Wiese, R. (1990). Über die Interaktion von Morphologie und Phonologie–Reduplikation im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 43(1–4), 603–24.Google Scholar
Wiese, R. (2001). Regular morphology vs. prosodic morphology? The case of truncations in German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 13(2), 131–77.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. M. & Pullum, G. K. (1987). Plain morphology and expressive morphology. In Aske, J., Beery, N., Michaelis, L. & Filip, H. (eds.) Proccedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 330–40.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Germanic
  • Edited by Jeffrey P. Williams, Texas Tech University
  • Book: Expressivity in European Languages
  • Online publication: 24 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108989084.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Germanic
  • Edited by Jeffrey P. Williams, Texas Tech University
  • Book: Expressivity in European Languages
  • Online publication: 24 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108989084.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Germanic
  • Edited by Jeffrey P. Williams, Texas Tech University
  • Book: Expressivity in European Languages
  • Online publication: 24 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108989084.005
Available formats
×