Book contents
- Explorations in Latin Literature
- Explorations in Latin Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- List of Acknowledgements and Original Places of Publication
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Si licet et fas est: Ovid’s Fasti and the Problem of Free Speech Under the Principate
- Chapter 2 ‘Shall I Compare Thee … ?’ Catullus 68B and the Limits of Analogy
- Chapter 3 Towards an Account of the Ancient World’s Concepts of Fictive Belief
- Chapter 4 Horace and the Greek Lyric Poets
- Chapter 5 Criticism Ancient and Modern
- Chapter 6 The Odiousness of Comparisons: Horace on Literary History and the Limitations of synkrisis
- Chapter 7 Una cum scriptore meo: Poetry, Principate, and the Traditions of Literary History in the Epistle to Augustus
- Chapter 8 Two Virgilian Acrostics: certissima signa?
- Chapter 9 Catullus and the Roman Paradox Epigram
- Chapter 10 Becoming an Authority: Horace on his Own Reception
- Chapter 11 Fathers and Sons: The Manlii Torquati and Family Continuity in Catullus and Horace
- Chapter 12 Doing the Numbers: The Roman Mathematics of Civil War in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra
- Chapter 13 Crediting Pseudolus: Trust, Belief, and the Credit Crunch in Plautus’ Pseudolus
- Chapter 14 Hic finis fandi: On the Absence of Punctuation for the Endings (and Beginnings) of Speeches in Latin Poetic Texts
- Chapter 15 Representation and the Materiality of the Book in Catullus’ Polymetrics
- Chapter 16 Catullus 61: Epithalamium and Comparison
- Chapter 17 Ovid’s Ciceronian Literary History: End-Career Chronology and Autobiography
- Chapter 18 Horace and the Literature of the Past: Lyric, Epic, and History in Odes 4
- Chapter 19 Forma manet facti (Ov. Fast. 2.379): Aetiologies of Myth and Ritual in Ovid’s Fasti and Metamorphoses
- Published Works of Denis Feeney
- Bibliography
- Index locorum
- General Index
Chapter 18 - Horace and the Literature of the Past: Lyric, Epic, and History in Odes 4
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2021
- Explorations in Latin Literature
- Explorations in Latin Literature
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- List of Acknowledgements and Original Places of Publication
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Si licet et fas est: Ovid’s Fasti and the Problem of Free Speech Under the Principate
- Chapter 2 ‘Shall I Compare Thee … ?’ Catullus 68B and the Limits of Analogy
- Chapter 3 Towards an Account of the Ancient World’s Concepts of Fictive Belief
- Chapter 4 Horace and the Greek Lyric Poets
- Chapter 5 Criticism Ancient and Modern
- Chapter 6 The Odiousness of Comparisons: Horace on Literary History and the Limitations of synkrisis
- Chapter 7 Una cum scriptore meo: Poetry, Principate, and the Traditions of Literary History in the Epistle to Augustus
- Chapter 8 Two Virgilian Acrostics: certissima signa?
- Chapter 9 Catullus and the Roman Paradox Epigram
- Chapter 10 Becoming an Authority: Horace on his Own Reception
- Chapter 11 Fathers and Sons: The Manlii Torquati and Family Continuity in Catullus and Horace
- Chapter 12 Doing the Numbers: The Roman Mathematics of Civil War in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra
- Chapter 13 Crediting Pseudolus: Trust, Belief, and the Credit Crunch in Plautus’ Pseudolus
- Chapter 14 Hic finis fandi: On the Absence of Punctuation for the Endings (and Beginnings) of Speeches in Latin Poetic Texts
- Chapter 15 Representation and the Materiality of the Book in Catullus’ Polymetrics
- Chapter 16 Catullus 61: Epithalamium and Comparison
- Chapter 17 Ovid’s Ciceronian Literary History: End-Career Chronology and Autobiography
- Chapter 18 Horace and the Literature of the Past: Lyric, Epic, and History in Odes 4
- Chapter 19 Forma manet facti (Ov. Fast. 2.379): Aetiologies of Myth and Ritual in Ovid’s Fasti and Metamorphoses
- Published Works of Denis Feeney
- Bibliography
- Index locorum
- General Index
Summary
Horace’s Greek lyric predecessors all had a distinctive relationship to Homer, and Horace had a problem in following them, since there was not really a figure in Roman culture comparable to Homer, even if Ennius looked like it in some ways. In the first three books of his Odes, published in 23 BCE, Horace made very few references to epic. But in his fourth book, published in 13 BCE after the death of Virgil and the publication of the Aeneid in 19 BCE, Horace engages systematically with epic, explicitly with Homer and Ennius. The chapter argues that it is in fact the new classic of the Aeneid that is the real focus of interest. The chapter closes by asking why Horace deliberately ignored the work of Livy in a book of poetry that was so interested in how best to represent and commemorate the Roman past.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Explorations in Latin Literature , pp. 343 - 363Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021