Book contents
- Everyday Justice
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Everyday Justice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter One Theorizing Everyday Justice
- Part One Im/possibilities of Everyday Justice
- Part Two The Force of Everyday Justice
- Part Three Everyday Justice Unbound
- Chapter Six Troubled Currents and the Contentious Moral Orderings of Drakes Estero
- Chapter Seven Everyday Justice at the Courthouse?
- Chapter Eight Ever in the Making
- Afterword
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- References
Chapter Six - Troubled Currents and the Contentious Moral Orderings of Drakes Estero
from Part Three - Everyday Justice Unbound
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Everyday Justice
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Everyday Justice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter One Theorizing Everyday Justice
- Part One Im/possibilities of Everyday Justice
- Part Two The Force of Everyday Justice
- Part Three Everyday Justice Unbound
- Chapter Six Troubled Currents and the Contentious Moral Orderings of Drakes Estero
- Chapter Seven Everyday Justice at the Courthouse?
- Chapter Eight Ever in the Making
- Afterword
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- References
Summary
Whose everyday? Whose place? This chapter examines the moral assumptions that anchor the different senses of justice concerning Drakes Estero, located in largely rural and agricultural Marin County, California, Point Reyes National Seashore. Vociferous opposition riddled local communities and spread throughout the region over whether a locally popular, family owner–operated oyster company should be allowed to stay once its federal permits for its terrestrial operations expired, and over whether Drakes Estero, legally designated as potential wilderness, should be allowed to become actual wilderness. This chapter investigates the wide array of notions about just and unjust uses of Drakes Estero manifested in the public sphere and the courtrooms, paying particular attention to the moralities that shaped the conflicts over jobs, ways of life, wilderness, environment, and justice. This conflict illuminates the ways in which contentious notions about uses of US public lands are, for all of their differences, premised on a shared perpetuating of the foundational social relations of what Durkheim calls non-integrative social solidarity. Taken in the larger context of contemporary conflicts over US public lands, this particular conflict leads us to query the forms of civics that arise from the social and legal processes of justice already in place.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Everyday JusticeLaw, Ethnography, Injustice, pp. 135 - 160Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Ames, Michael. 2015. ‘The Oyster Shell Game’. Newsweek, 18 January 2015. www.newsweek.com/2015/01/30/oyster-shell-game-300225.html, accessed 18 November 2016.Google Scholar
Babalis, Timothy. 2011. ‘Restoring the Past: Environmental History and Oysters at Point Reyes National Seashore’. The George Wright Forum 28(2): 199–215.Google Scholar
Behr, Peter. 2010 [1993]. ‘Oral History Interview with Ann Lage’. In Saving Point Reyes National Seashore, 1969–1970: An Oral History of Citizen Action in Conservation: Oral History Transcript/1993. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft Library Regional Oral History Office and Nabu Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Summer. 2015. The Oyster War: The True Story of a Small Farm, Big Politics, and the Future of Wilderness in America. Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint Press.Google Scholar
Brunnegger, Sandra, and Faulk, Karen (eds.). 2016. A Sense of Justice: Legal Knowledge and Lived Experience in Latin America. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Kamari Maxine, and Goodale, Mark (eds.). 2010. Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post–Cold War Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, George L. 2010 [1980]. ‘Oral History Interview with Ann Lage’. In The Art and Politics of Park Planning and Preservations, 1920–1979: Oral History Transcript/and Related Material, 1978–1980. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft Library Regional Oral History Office and Nabu Press.Google Scholar
Duddleston, William J. 2010 [1993]. ‘Oral History Interview with Ann Lage’. In Saving Point Reyes National Seashore, 1969–1970 An Oral History of Citizen Action in Conservation: Oral History Transcript/1993. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft Library Regional Oral History Office and Nabu Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1984. Division of Labor in Society, Halls, W. D., trans. New York: Free Press, Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairfax, Sally K., Nelson Dyble, Louise, Guthy, Greig Tor, Gwin, Lauren, Moore, Monica, and Sokolove, Jennifer. 2012. California Cuisine and Just Food, foreword by Nestle, M.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganapathy, Sandhya, 2013. ‘Imagining Alaska: Local and Translocal Engagements with Place’. American Anthropologist 115(1): 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliam, Harold. 1962. Island in Time: The Point Reyes Peninsula. New York: Sierra Club, Scribner.Google Scholar
Goodale, Mark, and Clarke, Kamari Maxine. 2010. ‘Introduction: Understanding the Multiplicity of Justice’. In Clarke, Kamari Maxine and Goodale, Mark (eds.), Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post–Cold War Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–27.Google Scholar
Goodman, Cory S. 2016. ‘The President’s Unfinished Promise: The Federal Government Still Lacks a Meaningful Scientific Integrity Policy’. Huffington Post, 26 February 2016. www.huffingtonpost.com/corey-s-goodman/scientific-integrity-policy_b_9024578.html, accessed 17 November 2016.Google Scholar
Graeser, Julie. 2013. ‘The Role of (Junk) Science in Wilderness Management: Lessons Learned in the Wake of Drakes Bay Oyster Company’. Hastings West-Northwest Journal of Environmental Law, Policy 19: 307–333.Google Scholar
Graf, William L. 1990. Wilderness Preservation and the Sagebrush Rebellions. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol J. 1998. ‘Figuring the Future: Issues of Time, Power, and Agency in Ethnographic Problems of Scale’. In Garth, Bryant and Sarat, Austin (eds.), Justice and Power in Sociolegal Studies. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, American Bar Association, 108–135.Google Scholar
Hart, John. 2012. An Island in Time: 50 Years of Point Reyes National Seashore. Mill Valley, CA: Pickleweed Press.Google Scholar
Hein, Jayne Foyle. 2013. ‘Of Mollusks and Men: The Wilderness Act and Drakes Bay Oyster Company’. The Berkeley Blog, 4 January 2013, http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2013/01/04/of-mollusks-and-men-the-wilderness-act-and-drakes-bay-oyster-company/, accessed 18 November 2016.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Susan F. 2010. ‘The Victim Deserving of Global Justice: Power, Caution, and Recovering Individuals’. In Clarke, Kamari Maxine and Goodale, Mark (eds.), Mirrors of Justice: Law and Power in the Post–Cold War Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 149–190.Google Scholar
Lage, Ann. 2010a [1993]. ‘Introduction’. In Saving Point Reyes National Seashore, 1969–1970: An Oral History of Citizen Action in Conservation: Oral History Transcript/1993. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft Library Regional Oral History Office and Nabu Press.Google Scholar
Lage, Ann, ed., 2010b. Saving Point Reyes National Seashore, 1969–1970: An Oral History of Citizen Action in Conservation: Oral History Transcript/1993. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft Library Regional Oral History Office and Nabu Press.Google Scholar
Leshy, John D. 2005. ‘Contemporary Politics of Wilderness Preservation’. Journal of Land Resources and Environmental Law 25(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Lowe, Setha. 2009. ‘Claiming Space for an Engaged Anthropology: Spatial Inequality and Social Exclusion’. America Anthropologist 113(3): 389–407.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E. 1995. ‘Mass Toxic Torts and the End of Everyday Life’. In Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R. (eds.), Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 237–274.Google Scholar
Miller Johnson, Katy. 2010a [1993]. ‘Oral History Interview with Ann Lage’. In Saving Point Reyes National Seashore, 1969–1970: An Oral History of Citizen Action in Conservation: Oral History Transcript/1993. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft Library Regional Oral History Office and Nabu Press.Google Scholar
Miller Johnson, Katy. 2010b [1993]. ‘A “Katy-gram”: Fact Sheet on Point Reyes for Congressmen 1969’. Reprinted in Saving Point Reyes National Seashore, 1969–1970: An Oral History of Citizen Action in Conservation: Oral History Transcript/1993. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft Library Regional Oral History Office and Nabu Press, unnumbered page between 67 and 68.Google Scholar
Nylen, Nell Green, Elizabeth Long, Mary Loum, Welles, Heather, Carlin, Dan, Cook, Brynn, and Adams, Sage. 2012. ‘Will the Wilderness Act be Diluted in Drakes Estero?’ Ecological Law Currents 39: 46–99.Google Scholar
Office of the Inspector General. 2013. Investigative Report of Drakes Bay Oyster Company Environmental Impact Statement. Office of the Inspector General, US Department for the Interior. 7 February.Google Scholar
Riles, Ellie, and Bush, Lisa. 2009. The Changing Role of Agriculture in Point Reyes National Seashore. Berkeley: University of California Cooperative Extension.Google Scholar
Sadin, Paul. 2007. Managing a Land in Motion: An Administrative History of Point Reyes National Seashore. US National Park Service.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas R. (eds.). 1995a. Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas R.. 1995b. ‘Law and Everyday Life: Editorial Introduction’. In Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R. (eds.), Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1–20.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas R. (eds.). 1999a. Justice and Injustice in Law and Legal Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas R.. 1999b. ‘Legal Justice and Injustice: Toward a Situated Perspective’. In Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R. (eds.), Justice and Injustice in Law and Legal Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael Peter. 2005. ‘Power in Place/Places of Power: Contextualizing Transnational Research’. City & Society 17(1): 5–34.Google Scholar
Stewart, Boyd. 2010a [1993]. ‘Oral History Interview with Ann Lage’. In Saving Point Reyes National Seashore, 1969–1970: An Oral History of Citizen Action in Conservation: Oral History Transcript/1993. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft Library Regional Oral History Office and Nabu Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, Boyd. 2010b [1993]. ‘Boyd Stewart Testimony – 1970’. In Saving Point Reyes National Seashore, 1969–1970: An Oral History of Citizen Action in Conservation: Oral History Transcript/1993. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft Library Regional Oral History Office and Nabu Press, 281–287.Google Scholar
Trainer, Amy. 2013. ‘It’s Time for Drakes Estero to Run Wild’. Latest News Earth Island Journal, Earth Island Institute, 16 May. www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/oeuvre/Amy-Trainer/, accessed 17 November 2016.Google Scholar
Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2005. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
US National Park Service. 2007. ‘Clarification of Law, Policy, and Science on Drakes Estero’. Public Letter, 18 September,Google Scholar
Watt, Laura. 2002. ‘The Trouble with Preservation, or, Getting Back to the Wrong Term for Wilderness Protection: A Case Study at Point Reyes National Seashore’. APCG Yearbook 64: 55–72.Google Scholar