Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables
- Acknowledgments
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction: foreign and security policy in the European Union
- Part I Institutions and foreign policy cooperation: the theoretical and empirical terrain
- Part II The institutionalization of cooperation
- Part III Residual institutional issues
- Conclusion: beyond the CFSP: institutions, defense, and the European identity
- References
- Index
Introduction: foreign and security policy in the European Union
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 January 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables
- Acknowledgments
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction: foreign and security policy in the European Union
- Part I Institutions and foreign policy cooperation: the theoretical and empirical terrain
- Part II The institutionalization of cooperation
- Part III Residual institutional issues
- Conclusion: beyond the CFSP: institutions, defense, and the European identity
- References
- Index
Summary
Nothing is possible without men; nothing lasts without institutions.
Jean MonnetOn November 19, 1970, Europe's novel experiment in regional economic integration quietly delved into uncharted territory. In Munich, at the former Prussian embassy to the Kingdom of Bavaria, European Union (EU) foreign ministers met for the first time under the rubric of a new institutional framework, “European Political Cooperation” (EPC). This meeting represented the latest in a long series of efforts to coordinate the foreign policies of EU member states in areas other than economic affairs. The EU's previous attempts to coordinate such policies, such as the European Defense Community and the European Political Community of the 1950s, and the Fouchet Plans of the 1960s, had failed miserably because of fundamental disagreements about the means and ends of European foreign policy cooperation. Thanks to this legacy, EPC was greeted with considerable uncertainty and skepticism when the EU foreign ministers met in Munich. The meeting aroused little public attention, and EPC participants themselves expected the profound differences in their foreign policy traditions, domestic political cultures, administrative capacities, and global relationships to inhibit their attempts to find a collective voice in world politics.
In addition, not only was EPC's scope of action so indeterminate that it threatened to invite more conflict than cooperation, but its mechanisms to induce such cooperation were feeble and peculiar. It was not based on a treaty, nor did it have any permanent organizational machinery. Its rules were extremely vague and its instruments for collective action few.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Europe's Foreign and Security PolicyThe Institutionalization of Cooperation, pp. 1 - 14Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003