Book contents
- EthnoprimatologyA Practical Guide to Research at the Human–Nonhuman Primate Interface
- Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology
- Ethnoprimatology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Methods
- 1 Introduction: Doing Ethnoprimatology in the Anthropocene
- Part I Characterizing the Interface
- Part II Following the Data: Incorporating Ethnography
- Part III Implications for Conservation
- Index
- References
1 - Introduction: Doing Ethnoprimatology in the Anthropocene
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2017
Book contents
- EthnoprimatologyA Practical Guide to Research at the Human–Nonhuman Primate Interface
- Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology
- Ethnoprimatology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Methods
- 1 Introduction: Doing Ethnoprimatology in the Anthropocene
- Part I Characterizing the Interface
- Part II Following the Data: Incorporating Ethnography
- Part III Implications for Conservation
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- EthnoprimatologyA Practical Guide to Research at the Human-Nonhuman Primate Interface, pp. 1 - 6Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Asquith, P. J. (1995). Of monkeys and men: Cultural views in Japan and the West. In Corbey, R. & Theunissen, B. (eds.) Ape, Man, and Apeman: Changing Views Since 1600. Leiden: Department of Prehistory of Leiden University.Google Scholar
Asquith, P. J. (2000). Negotiating science: Internationalization and Japanese primatology. In Strum, S. C. & Fedigan, L. M. (eds.) Primate Encounters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Candea, M. (2013). Habituating meerkats and redescribing animal behaviour science. Theory, Culture & Society, 30, 105–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormier, L. A. (2002). Monkey as food, Monkey as child: Guaja symbolic cannibalism. In Fuentes, A. & Wolfe, L. (eds.) Primates Face to Face: Conservation Implications of Human–Honhuman Primate Interconnections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cormier, L. A. (2003). Kinship with Monkeys: The Guaja Foragers of Eastern Amazonia. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crutzen, P. J. & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The “Anthropocene.” Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17–18.Google Scholar
Dore, K. M. (2013). An anthropological investigation of the dynamic human–vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) interface in St. Kitts, West Indies. PhD, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
Fuentes, A. (2006). Human–nonhuman primate interconnections and their relevance to anthropology. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 2, 1–11.Google Scholar
Fuentes, A. (2010). Naturalcultural encounters in Bali: Monkeys, temples, tourists, and ethnoprimatology. Cultural Anthropology, 25, 600–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, A. (2012). Ethnoprimatology and the anthropology of the human–primate interface. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, A. & Hockings, K. J. (2010). The ethnoprimatological approach in primatology. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 841–847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuentes, A. & Wolfe, L. D. (eds.) (2002). Primates Face to Face: The Conservation Implications of Human–Nonhuman Primate Interconnections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jay, P. (1963). The social behavior of the langur monkey. PhD Dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Jones-Engel, L., Engel, G. A., Schillaci, M. A., Babo, R., & Froehlich, J. (2001). Detection of antibodies to selected human pathogens among wild and pet macaques (Macaca tonkeana) in Sulawesi, Indonesia. American Journal of Primatology, 54, 171–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones-Engel, L., Engel, G., & Fuentes, A. (2011). An ethnoprimatological approach to interactions between human and non-human primates. In Setchell, J. & Curtis, D. J. (eds.) Field and Laboratory Methods in Primatology: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jost Robinson, C. A. & Remis, M. J. (2014). Entangled realms: Hunters and hunted in the Dzanga-Sangha Dense Forest Reserve (APDS), Central African Republic. Anthropological Quarterly, 87, 613–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klegarth, A. (2015). Landscape genetic structure, ranging patterns, and management of urban primates. PhD thesis, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Knight, J. (ed.) (2005). Animals in Person: Cultural Perspectives on Human–Animal Intimacies. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Lane-Degraaf, K. E., Fuentes, A., & Hollocher, H. (2014). Landscape genetics reveal fine-scale boundaries in island populations of Indonesian long-tailed macaques. American Journal of Primatology, 29, 1505–1519.Google Scholar
Lee, P. C. (2010). Sharing space: Can ethnoprimatology contribute to the survival of nonhuman primates in human-dominated landscapes? American Journal of Primatology, 72, 925–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lestel, D., Brunois, F., & Gaunet, F. (2006). Etho-ethnology and ethno-ethology. Social Science Information, 45, 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loudon, J. E., Sauther, M. L., Fish, D. D., Hunter-Ishikawa, M., & Ibrahim, Y. J. (2006). One reserve, three primates: Applying a holistic approach to understand the interconnections among ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta), Verraux’s sifaka (Propithecus verrauxi), and humans (Homo sapiens) at Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve, Madagascar. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 2, 54–74.Google Scholar
Malone, N., Wade, A. H., Fuentes, A., et al. (2014). Ethnoprimatology: Critical interdisciplinarity and multispecies approaches in anthropology. Critique of Anthropology, 34, 8–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, J. & Wallis, J. (eds.) (2005). Commensalism and Conflict: The Human–Primate Interface. Norman, OK: ASP.Google Scholar
Riley, E. P. (2006). Ethnoprimatology: Toward reconciliation between biological and cultural anthropology. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 2, 75–86.Google Scholar
Riley, E. P. (2007). The human–macaque interface: Conservation implications of current and future overlap and conflict in Lore Lindu National park, Sulawesi, Indonesia. American Anthropologist, 109, 473–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, E. P. (2010). The importance of human–macaque folklore for conservation in Lore Lindu National Park, Sulawesi, Indonesia. Oryx, 44, 235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, E. P. (2013). Contemporary primatology in anthropology: Beyond the epistemological abyss. American Anthropologist, 115, 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, E. P. & Ellwanger, A. L. (2013). Methods in ethnoprimatology: Exploring the human–nonhuman primate interface. In Sterling, E. J., Bynum, N., & Blair, M. E. (eds.) Primate Ecology and Conservation: A Handbook of Techniques. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodman, P. S. (1999). Whither primatology? The place of primates in contemporary anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 311–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruddiman, W. F. (2003). The anthropogenic greenhouse era began thousands of years ago. Climate Change, 61, 261–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sponsel, L. E. (1997). The human niche in Amazonia: Explorations in ethnoprimatology. In Kinnzey, W. G. (ed.) New World Primates: Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior. New York: Aldine Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sussman, R. W. (2011). A brief history for primate field studies. In Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Bearder, S. K., & Stumpf, R. M. (eds.) Primates in Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Syvitski, J. P. M. (2012). Anthropocene: An epoch of our making. Global Change, 78, 12–15.Google Scholar
Tutin, C. E. G. & Oslisly, R. (1995). Homo, Pan and Gorilla: Co-existence over 60,000 years at Lope in Central Gabon. Journal of Human Evolution, 28, 597–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washburn, S. (1951). The new physical anthropology. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 13, 298–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheatley, B. (1999). The Sacred Monkeys of Bali. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by