Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:51:41.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Culture and ethics in health care

from Part I - Ethics in health care: role, history, and methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

John C. Moskop
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Case example

Dr. Jordan is a neonatologist providing intensive care for Baby Sanjay, a 2-week-old premature infant with a large unilateral cerebral hemorrhagic infarct (a blood clot in the brain causing bleeding and tissue damage). Because his lungs are not fully developed, Baby Sanjay is currently dependent on a mechanical ventilator to support his breathing. Dr. Jordan believes that Baby Sanjay has a fairly good chance of survival (60–70 percent) with continuing intensive care. It is very probable, however, that he will be both physically and mentally disabled. At this early stage of Baby Sanjay's development, the degree of his eventual disability is still highly uncertain. It could be mild to profound, and there is a small chance he would survive without disability. Dr. Jordan has provided intensive care for hundreds of infants with medical conditions like Baby Sanjay, and he is committed to preserving the lives and promoting the health and well-being of his patients.

Baby Sanjay's parents are citizens of India; his father is working temporarily in the USA, but they plan to return to India shortly. They visit their son frequently and are very concerned about his serious medical problems. After hearing that, if he survives, Baby Sanjay will probably be mentally and physically disabled, the parents have asked Dr. Jordan to discontinue ventilator support and allow the baby to die. They explain that in their home city in India, disabled people face severe discrimination; little education, rehabilitation, or health care is available to them. Therefore, they prefer to allow Baby Sanjay to die rather than to live what they believe will be a life of profound suffering and indignity.

To evaluate the parents’ request, Dr. Jordan consults several of his colleagues who received their medical training in India. They corroborate the parents’ claim that mentally disabled persons, and their families, suffer great discrimination and receive little support in India. How should Dr. Jordan respond to the parents’ request?

The ubiquity of cultural diversity

Until the twentieth century, most of the world's people lived and died within their own community, region, or nation and had little contact with foreigners or “strangers.” Developments in travel, technology, communication, politics, and economics since that time have transformed this situation in all but the world's poorest and remotest regions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ethics and Health Care
An Introduction
, pp. 63 - 74
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carrese, Joseph A. and Rhodes, Lorna A. 2000. Bridging cultural differences in medical practice: the case of discussing negative information with Navajo patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine 15: 92–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kagawa-Singer, Marjorie and Blackhall, Leslie J. 2001. Negotiating cross-cultural issues at the end of life: “you got to go where he lives.”JAMA 286: 2993–3001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopelman, Loretta M. 1997. Medicine's challenge to relativism: the case of female genital mutilation. In Carson, Ronald A. and Burns, Chester R. (eds.) Philosophy of Medicine and Bioethics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 221–237.Google ScholarPubMed
Macklin, Ruth. 1998. Ethical relativism in a multicultural society. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tervalon, Melanie and Murray-Garcia, Jann. 1998. Cultural humility versus cultural competence: a critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 9: 117–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×