Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps
- List of tables
- Acknowledgements
- Glossary
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 From the archaeology of mind to the archaeology of matter
- 2 Subsistence and predation at the margins of cultivation
- 3 State formation in the highland forests 1350–1800
- 4 The peoples of the Sahyadri under Marathas and British
- 5 The central Indian forest from Mughal suzerainty to British control
- 6 The central Indian forest under early British rule
- 7 Identities and aspiration – not noble savage but savage noble
- 8 The high colonial period and after – new patterns of authority and power
- 9 From sanctuaries to safeguards: policies and politics in twentieth-century India
- Conclusion
- Afterword
- Bibliography
- Index
5 - The central Indian forest from Mughal suzerainty to British control
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 November 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps
- List of tables
- Acknowledgements
- Glossary
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 From the archaeology of mind to the archaeology of matter
- 2 Subsistence and predation at the margins of cultivation
- 3 State formation in the highland forests 1350–1800
- 4 The peoples of the Sahyadri under Marathas and British
- 5 The central Indian forest from Mughal suzerainty to British control
- 6 The central Indian forest under early British rule
- 7 Identities and aspiration – not noble savage but savage noble
- 8 The high colonial period and after – new patterns of authority and power
- 9 From sanctuaries to safeguards: policies and politics in twentieth-century India
- Conclusion
- Afterword
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
PART I – THE BHIL COUNTRY
Introduction,
We have so far looked the peoples dwelling in the peninsula; now our focus shifts to its northern boundaries. These are marked by the two great west-flowing rivers, the Narmada and Tapti, and by the parallel ranges that separate their valleys from each other and the Dakhan plateau. In the nineteenth century the forest people who dominated the hill forest in the western half of this region were termed Bhils – a name also found in the rugged country of north-east Gujarat and the adjoining regions of Rajasthan. The ethnonym itself does not (to my knowledge) appear until the early medieval period and is not mentioned in the great classical lexicon Amarakosha, nor could I trace it in an exhaustive index to the Valmiki Ramayana. However, by 1240 CE when a Sanskrit work on dance was written in north Karnataka, the Bhils evidently possessed a distinct identity and costume, which the performers of a particular dance were supposed to don (bhillaveshamupeyushim). The dance was also performed in Maharashtra, but (the treatise continues) it was known there as the Gondli dance since that was the term for Bhilla in Maharashtra at the time. So the name was unfamiliar in thirteenth-century Maharashtra, but the life-style had a local equivalent permitting translation. The name Bhilla (and not necessarily the population) thus originated in the Dravidian-speaking south, and then travelled north to its later lodgement in the central Indian forests.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Environment and Ethnicity in India, 1200–1991 , pp. 108 - 129Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1999