Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T13:09:34.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Economic history and neomercantilism: William Cunningham and J. S. Nicholson

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2011

Gerard M. Koot
Affiliation:
Southeastern Massachusetts University
Get access

Summary

Both critics and supporters of William Cunningham agreed that the archdeacon's volumes on English economic history laid the foundation of the discipline in England as an academic field of study. J.H. Clapham, a student of Marshall who represented the next generation in the study of economic history, dedicated his work on English economic history to both Cunningham and Marshall. Cunningham achieved his success in spite of his often bitter academic and personal disputes with Marshall. Indeed, it is difficult to imagine two more dissimilar academics than Cunningham and Marshall who shared the broadly similar goal of expanding economic studies at Cambridge. Cunningham delighted in controversy and Marshall shunned it. Cunningham derided the usefulness of economic theory and Marshall made it his life's work. Cunningham worked for the recognition of economic history as an independent subject and Marshall saw it as a handmaiden of economic theory. Cunningham was a vigorous nationalist and imperialist and Marshall's framework was more cosmopolitan.

The very qualities of stridency that gave Cunningham an independent voice at Marshall's Cambridge were not the attributes necessary to mold the often different views and interests of the historical economists into a coherent school. Other historical economists were generous in their praise of Cunningham, but they also criticized his work. Ashley noted that Cunningham's greatest fault was his failure to stress the evolutionary nature of institutions. He wins shrewdly noted that Cunningham's view of history was governed by the abstraction of national power.

Type
Chapter
Information
English Historical Economics, 1870–1926
The Rise of Economic History and Neomercantilism
, pp. 135 - 159
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×