Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:12:19.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2023

Edited by
J. N. Adams ,
Anna Chahoud  and
Giuseppe Pezzini
J. N. Adams
Affiliation:
All Souls College, Oxford
Anna Chahoud
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin
Giuseppe Pezzini
Affiliation:
Corpus Christi College, Oxford
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Early Latin
Constructs, Diversity, Reception
 , pp. 597 - 637
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acciarino, D. (2017), ‘The Renaissance Editions of Festus,’ Acta Classica 60, 162–72.Google Scholar
Adamik, B. (2014), ‘Zur Prosodie, Metrik und Interpretation von Catulls Carmen 116’, WS 127, 151–64.Google Scholar
Adams, I. (2016), ‘Some Latin Funerary Formulae with OBITVS as a Direct Object: Origin, Meaning and Use’, CQ 66, 525–39.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (1977), ‘The Vocabulary of the Annales Regni Francorum’, Glotta 55, 257–82.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (1982), The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. London.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (1983), ‘Words for “Prostitute” in Latin’, RhM 126, 321–58.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (1984), ‘Female Speech in Latin Comedy’, Antichthon 18, 43–77.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (1994a), Wackernagel’s Law and the Placement of the Copula ‘esse’ in Classical Latin. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (1994b), ‘Wackernagel’s Law and the Position of Unstressed Personal Pronouns in Classical Latin’, TPhS 92, 103–78.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (1995), Pelagonius and Latin Veterinary Terminology in the Roman Empire. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N. (2003), Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (2004), ‘A Passage of Varro, “De Lingua Latina” and an Oscan Fragment of Atellan Farce’, Mnemosyne 57, 352–8.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (2005), ‘The Bellum Africum’, in Reinhardt, , Lapidge, and Adams, (2005), 73–96.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (2007), The Regional Diversification of Latin, 200 bc – ad 600. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N. (2013), Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (2016), An Anthology of Informal Latin 200 bc – ad 900. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (2021), Asyndeton and its Interpretation in Latin Literature: History, Patterns, Textual Criticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. (forthcoming), ‘Ancient Writing (Latin)’, in de Melo, and Scullion, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. and Mayer, R. (eds.) (1999), Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. and Vincent, N. (eds.) (2016), Early and Late Latin: Continuity or Change? Cambridge.Google Scholar
Agostiniani, L. (2013), ‘Sulla procedure di analisi dei sistemi di scrittura e sulla rappresentazione di /f/ nell’alfabeto nucerino’, in Bruni, and Cianferoni, (eds.), 29–52.Google Scholar
Agostiniani, L., Calderini, A. and Masserelli, R. (2011), Screhto est, lingua e scrittura degli antichi umbri: catalogo della mostra. Perugia.Google Scholar
Agustín, A. (1559), De M. Verrii Flacci quae extant. Ex Sex. Pompei Festi de uerborum significatione. Venice.Google Scholar
Albrecht, M. von (1989), Masters of Roman Prose from Cato to Apuleius: Interpretative Studies, transl. N. Adkin. Leeds.Google Scholar
Albrecht, M. von and Schubert, W. (eds.) (1990), Musik und Dichtung: Neue Forschungsbeiträge. Viktor Pöschl zum 80. Geburtstag gewidmet. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Allardice, J. T. (1929), Syntax of Terence. London.Google Scholar
Amsel, G. (1887), De ui atque indole rhytmorum quid ueteres iudicauerint. Breslau.Google Scholar
Ancilotti, A., Calderini, A., and Massarelli, M. (eds.) (2016), Forme e strutture della religione nell’Italia mediana antica. Rome.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. (2001), ‘Plautus’ Mastery of Comic Language’, in Segal, E. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Menander, Plautus, and Terence (Oxford), 107–14.Google Scholar
André, J.-M. (1959), ‘Erreurs de traduction chez Pline l’ancien’, REL 37, 203–15.Google Scholar
André, J.-M. (1964), Pline l’ancien, Histoire naturelle: Livre xvii . Paris.Google Scholar
Ángel Espinos, J. et al. (eds.) (2015), Hygíeia kaì gélos: Homenaje a I. Rodríguez Alfageme. Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Anreiter, P. and Jerem, E. (eds.) (1999), Studia Celtica et Indogermanica: Festschrift für Wolfgang Meid. Budapest.Google Scholar
Appel, G. (1909), De Romanorum precationibus. Giessen.Google Scholar
Arias Abellán, C. (2002), ‘Les dérivés latins en -arius’, in Kircher-Durand, (2002), 161–84.Google Scholar
Arnim, M. von (1903–1905), Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta. 4 vols. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Artigas, E. (1990), Pacuviana: Marco Pacuvio en Cicerón. Barcelona.Google Scholar
Astbury, R. (2002), M. Terentius Varro Saturarum Menippearum fragmenta, 2nd ed. Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Astin, A. E. (1978), Cato the Censor. Oxford.Google Scholar
Attenni, L. and Maras, D. F. (2004), ‘Materiali arcaici dalla collezione Dionigi di Lanuvio ed il più antico alfebetario latino’, SE 70, 61–78.Google Scholar
Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.) (2013), A Companion to Terence. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ax, W. (1986), ‘Quadripartita ratio: Bemerkungen zur Geschichte eines aktuellen Kategoriensystems’, Historiographia Linguistica 13, 191–214.Google Scholar
Ax, W. (2011), Quintilians Grammatik (Inst. orat. 1.4–8): Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bader, F. (1962), La formation des composés nominaux du latin. Paris.Google Scholar
Bagnasco, G. (1999), ‘L’acquisizione della scrittura in Etruria: materiali a confronto per la ricostruzione del quadro storico e culturale’, in Bagnasco, and Cordano, (1999), 85–106.Google Scholar
Bagnasco, G. and Cordano, F. (eds.) (1999), Scritture mediterranee tra il ix e il vii secolo a.C. Atti del seminario: Università degli Studi di Milano, Istituto di Storia Antica, 23–24 febbraio 1998. Milan.Google Scholar
Bagordo, A. (2007), ‘Langversstil und Senarstil bei Terenz’, in Kruschwitz, , Ehlers, and Felgentreu, (2007), 127–42.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. (1947), Titi Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bakkum, G. C. L. M. (1996), ‘Capenate esú, CIL I(2).476.6 = xi.6707.6, CIL 12.2496.9’, in Risselada, , Jong, and Bolkestein, (1996), 1–6.Google Scholar
Bakkum, G. C. L. M. (2009), The Latin Dialect of the Ager Faliscus. 2 vols. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Baldelli, G. and Lo Schiavo, F. (eds.) (2014), Amore per l’antico: Dal Tirreno all’Adriatico, dalla Preistoria al Medioevo e oltre, Studi di antichità in ricordo di Giuliano de Marinis: Volume 1, 2 vols. Rome.Google Scholar
Baldi, P. (2002), The Foundations of Latin. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Baldi, P. and Cuzzolin, P. (eds.) (2009–2014), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, 4 vols. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Ballu, A. (1906), ‘Fouilles archéologiques d’Algérie en 1905’, Bulletin archéologique du Comité des Travaux Historiques et Scientifiques, 182–222.Google Scholar
Bammesberger, A. and Heberlein, F. (eds.) (1996), Akten des VIII. internationalen Kolloquiums zur lateinischen Linguistik. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Baños, J. M. (2009), Sintaxis del latín clásico. Madrid.Google Scholar
Baños, J. M. (2012), ‘Verbos soporte e incorporación sintáctica en latín: el ejemplo de ludos facere’, Revista de Estudios Latinos 12, 37–57.Google Scholar
Baños, J. M. (2013), ‘Sobre las maneras de “hacer la guerra” en latín (bellum gero, belligero, bello)’, in Beltrán, , Encuentra, and Fontana, (2013), 27–39.Google Scholar
Baños, J. M. (2014), ‘Consilium (habere, capere, dare): un sustantivo hecho predicado’, in Baños, et al. (2014), 103–14.Google Scholar
Baños, J. M. (2015a), ‘Bellum gerere y proelium facere: Sobre las construcciones con verbo soporte en latín (y en griego)’, in Muñoz, and Carrasco, (2015), 227–34.Google Scholar
Baños, J. M. (2015b), ‘Colocaciones verbo-nominales y traducción del griego al latín: el Evangelio de san Mateo’, in Ángel Espinos, et al. (2015), 61–72.Google Scholar
Baños, J. M. (2016), ‘Las construcciones con verbo soporte en latín: sintaxis y semántica’, in Borrell, and De la Cruz, (2016), 15–39.Google Scholar
Baños, J. M. (2018), ‘Las construcciones con verbo soporte en latín: una perspectiva diacrónica’, in Bodelot, and Spevak, (2018), 21–52.Google Scholar
Baños, J. M. (2021), ‘Proelia miscere: sobre las construcciones con verbo soporte en la poesía latina’, in Unceta, L., Martín, A. M., López Grégoris, R. and González Vázquez, C. (eds.), Homenaje a Benjamín García Hernández. Madrid, 593–608.Google Scholar
Baños, J. M. et al. (eds.) (2014), Philologia, Universitas, Vita: Trabajos en honor de T. González Rolán. Madrid.Google Scholar
Baños, J. M. and Jiménez López, M. D. (2017), ‘«Odiar» en el Nuevo Testamento (odi, odio sum, odio habeo): traducción y construcciones con verbo soporte en la Vulgata’, Euphrosyne 45, 59–78.Google Scholar
Barabino, G. (1981), ‘Osservazioni sul senario giambico di Fedro’, in Fabiano, G. and Salvaneschi, E. (eds.), Desmos koinōnias: scritti di filologia e filosofia. Genoa, 91–122.Google Scholar
Barabino, G. (1985), ‘Note metriche sui senari giambici delle “Sententiae” di Publilio Siro’, AALig 42, 202–28.Google Scholar
Barabino, G. (2005), ‘L’auctoritas di Plauto in Nonio Marcello’, in Taifacos, (2005), 91–7.Google Scholar
Barabino, G. (2006), Scripta Noniana. Genoa.Google Scholar
Baratin, M., Colombat, B., and Holtz, L. (eds.) (2009), Priscien: transmission et refondation de la grammaire de l’Antiquité aux Modernes. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Bàrberi Squarotti, G. (ed.) (1994), Voce di molte acque: miscellanea di studi offerti a Eugenio Corsini. Turin.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, M. (1962), Nevio epico: storia, interpretazione, edizione critica dei frammenti del primo epos latino. Padua.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1989), ‘The Size of the Sun in Antiquity’, ACD 25: 29–41.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2015), Mantissa: Essays in Ancient Philosophy iv . Oxford.Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. et al. (2013), ‘The Story of “Woe”’, Journal of Indo-European Studies 41, 321–77.Google Scholar
Barrios-Lech, P. (2016), Linguistic Interaction in Roman Comedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barrios-Lech, P. (2017), ‘Tyndarus’ Bilingual Pun and the Ambiguities of Plautus’ Captivi’, CPh 112, 253–67.Google Scholar
Barsby, J. (1999), Terence Eunuchus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barsby, J. (2001), Terence, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bartalucci, A. (1997), ‘Arcaismi’, in Enciclopedia Oraziana 3 (Rome), 797–9.Google Scholar
Bartoněk, A. and Bu, chner, G. (1995), ‘Die ältesten griechischen Inschriften von Pithekoussai (2. Hälfte des VIII. bis 1. Hälfte des VII. Jhs.)’, Die Sprache 37, 129–31.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. (1996), ‘The Fragments of Furius Antias’, CQ 46, 387–402.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. (2009), ‘Word Order’, in Baldi, and Cuzzolin, (2009–2014), 1. 241–316.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. (2011), ‘Word Formation’, in Maiden, , Smith, and Ledgeway, (2011), 532–63.Google Scholar
Beare, W. (1930), ‘Plautus and the Fabula Atellana’, CR 44, 165–8.Google Scholar
Beare, W. (1949), ‘The Date of the Bellum Punicum’, CR 63, 48.Google Scholar
Beare, W. (1964), The Roman Stage: A Short History of Latin Drama in the Time of the Republic, 3rd ed. London [1st ed. 1950].Google Scholar
Beaujeu, J. (1951), Pline l’ancien, Histoire naturelle: Livre ii . Paris.Google Scholar
Beaujeu, J. (1982), ‘La langue de l’astronomie dans l’Histoire naturelle de Pline l’ancien’, in Plinio il Vecchio sotto il profilo storico e letterario. Atti del Convegno di Como, 5-6-7 ottobre 1979. Atti della Tavola rotonda nella ricorrenza centenaria della morte di Plinio il Vecchio, Bologna 16 dicembre 1979 (Como) (Como), 83–95.Google Scholar
Beazley, J. D. (1949), ‘The World of the Etruscan Mirror’, JHS 69, 1–17.Google Scholar
Becker, E. (1873), ‘De syntaxi interrogationum obliquarum apud priscos scriptores Latinos’, Studemunds Studien 1, 113–314.Google Scholar
Bellelli, V. and Benelli, E. (eds.) (2018), Gli Etruschi: La scrittura, la lingua, la società. Rome.Google Scholar
Beltrán, J. A., Encuentra, A., and Fontana, G. (eds.) (2013), Otium cum dignitate: estudios en homenaje al profesor José Javier Iso Echegoyen. Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Benedetti, M. et al. (eds.) (2016), Grammatiche e grammatici. Teorie, testi e contesti, Atti del xxxix Convegno della Società Italiana di Glottologia. Rome.Google Scholar
Benelli, E. (2008), ‘L’aspetto grafico’, in Santoro, (2008), 23–7.Google Scholar
Benelli, E. (2013), ‘Agro falisco e Sabina: qualche osservazioni’, in Cifani, (2013), 313–19.Google Scholar
Benelli, E. (2014), ‘Diaspore Sabine’, in Baldelli, and Lo Schiavo, (2014), 25–9.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. E. (1910–1914), Syntax of Early Latin, 2 vols. Boston and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bernardi Perini, G. (1983), ‘Le “riforme” ortografiche latine di età repubblicana’, AION(ling) 5, 141–69.Google Scholar
Bernays, J. (1885), Gesammelte Abhandlungen, 2 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Berrendonner, C. (2009), ‘L’invention des épitaphes dans la Rome médio-républicaine’, in Haack, (2009), 181–201.Google Scholar
Bertini, F. (ed.) (2003), Prolegomena Noniana 2. Genoa.Google Scholar
Bertrand, É. (1897), ‘Cicéron au théâtre’, Annales de l’Université de Grenoble 9, 83–208.Google Scholar
Beta, S. (2015), ‘Cyclops’, in Lauriola, and Demetriou, (2015), 607–20.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (1979), Studi e note su Ennio. Pisa.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (1982), ‘A proposito dei versi sotadei, greci e romani: con alcuni capitoli di ‘analisi metrica lineare’, MD 9, 59–105.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (1984), ‘Arcaismi’, in Enciclopedia Virgiliana (Rome), 287–91.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (1990), ‘La “correptio iambica”’, in Danese, , Gori, and Questa, (1990), 263–409.Google Scholar
Bibauw, J. (ed.) (1969), Hommages à Marcel Renard, Volume 2. Leuven.Google Scholar
Biddau, F. (2008), Q. Terentii Scauri De orthographia. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Bilde, P. G. and Poulsen, B. (2008) The Temple of Castor and Pollux 2.1: The Finds. 2 vols. Rome.Google Scholar
Biville, F. (1989), ‘Grec et latin: contacts linguistiques et création lexicale; Pour une typologie des héllenismes lexicaux du latin’, in Lavency, and Longrée, (1989), 29–40.Google Scholar
Biville, F. (1990), Les emprunts du latin au grec: approche phonétique; Tome I: Introduction et consonantisme. Leuven and Paris.Google Scholar
Biville, F. (1995), Les emprunts du latin au grec: approche phonétique; Tome II: Vocalisme et conclusions. Leuven and Paris.Google Scholar
Biville, F. (1996), ‘Le statut linguistique des interjections en latin’, in Rosén, (1996), 209–20.Google Scholar
Biville, F. (2000), ‘Bilinguisme gréco-latin et créations éphémères de discours’, in Fruyt, and Nicolas, (2000), 91–107.Google Scholar
Blanchard-Lemée, M. (1980), ‘La mosaïque de Khamissa, au Musée de Guelma (Algérie)’, Bulletin de l’AIEMA 8, 50–1.Google Scholar
Blanchard-Lemée, M. (1988), ‘Euphronesis’, LIMC 4, 74.Google Scholar
Blank, D. (2008), ‘Varro and the Epistemological Status of Etymology’, HEL 30, 49–73.Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J. (1974), ‘Das Bild der Komödie in der späten Republik’, in Reinhardt, and Sallmann, (1974), 141–57.Google Scholar
Blänsdorf, J. (2011), Fragmenta poetarum Latinorum epicorum et lyricorum praeter Enni Annales et Ciceronis Germanicique Aratea, post W. Morel et K. Büchner, 4th ed. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. (ed.) (2015), A Companion to Ancient Education. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Blümel, W. (1972), Untersuchungen zu Lautsystem und Morphologie des vorklassischen Lateins. Munich.Google Scholar
Bodel, J. (1994), Graveyards and Groves. A Study of the Lex Lucerina. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bodelot, C. (1987), L’interrogation indirecte en latin: Syntaxe – Valeur illocutoire – Formes. Paris.Google Scholar
Bodelot, C. (1990), Termes introducteurs et modes dans l’interrogation indirecte en latin de Plaute à Juvénal. Avignon.Google Scholar
Bodelot, C. (2000), Espaces fonctionnels de la subordination complétive en latin: Étude morpho-syntactique et sémantico-énonciative. Paris.Google Scholar
Bodelot, C. (2003), ‘L’interrogation indirecte’, in Bodelot, C. (ed.), Grammaire fondamentale du latin Tome X: Les propositions complétives en latin. Paris, 193–333.Google Scholar
Bodelot, C. (2021a), ‘Faits de langue et variations génériques chez Cicéron: étude de ecquis’, in L. Unceta Gómez, C. González Vázquez, R. López Gregoris and A. M. Martín Rodríguez (eds.), Amice benigneque honorem nostrum habes. Estudios lingüísticos en homenaje al Profesor Benjamin García-Hernández. Madrid, 553–67.Google Scholar
Bodelot, C. (2021b), ‘Ecquis en latin classique’, in A. M. Martín Rodríguez (ed.), Linguisticae Dissertationes, Current Perspectives on Latin Grammar, Lexicon and Pragmatics. Selected Papers from the 20th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, June 17-21, 2019). Madrid, 313–26.Google Scholar
Bodelot, C. and Spevak, O. (eds.) (2018), Les constructions à verbe support en latin. Clermont-Ferrand.Google Scholar
Boissier, G. (1901), ‘Claveau d’une des portes de la façade du théâtre de Khamissa (Afrique)’, Comptes-rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 45, 344–6.Google Scholar
Boldrini, S. (2004), Fondamenti di prosodia e metrica latina. Rome.Google Scholar
Boldrini, S. (2017), La prosodia e la metrica dei Romani, 3rd ed. Rome (1st ed. 1992).Google Scholar
Bonadeo, A. and Romano, E. (eds.) (2007), Dialogando con il passato: permanenze e innovazioni nella cultura latina di età flavia. Florence.Google Scholar
Bonaria, M. (1965), Romani mimi. Rome.Google Scholar
Bondarko, N. A. and Kazanskij, N. N. (eds.) (2009), Indoevropejskoe jazykoznanie i klassičeskaja filologija xiii . St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Bonnet, G. (2013), ‘Les formes verbales archaïques sous le regard des grammairiens latins’, in Garcea, , Lhommé, and Vallat, (2013), 729–41.Google Scholar
Booth, J. (ed.) (2007), Cicero on the Attack. Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond. Swansea.Google Scholar
Bordenaque Battaglia, G. and Emiliozzi, A. (1990), Le ciste prenestine I, 2 vols. Rome.Google Scholar
Borrell, E. and Cruz, O. de la (eds.) (2016), Omnia mutantur: Canvi, transformació i pervivència en la cultura clàssica, en les seves llengües i en el seu llegat, 2 vols. Barcelona.Google Scholar
Boscherini, S. (1970a), ‘Due probabili calchi greci in Catone’, in Mille: I dibattiti del Circolo linguistico fiorentino, 1945–1970. Florence, 27–32.Google Scholar
Boscherini, S. (1970b), Lingua e scienza greca nel De agri cultura di Catone. Rome.Google Scholar
Boscherini, S. (1976), ‘Città e campagna nella dottrina linguistica di Varrone’, in Atti del congresso internazionale di studi varroniani. Rieti, 317–20.Google Scholar
Boscherini, S. (1993), ‘Termini medici negli scritti di M. Porcio Catone’, in Boscherini, S. (ed.), Studi di lessicologia medica antica. Bologna, 31–43.Google Scholar
Botley, P. (2014), ‘Three Very Different Translators: Joseph Scaliger, Isaac Casaubon and Richard Thomson’, CRCL 41, 477–91.Google Scholar
Botley, P. and van Miert, D. (2012), The Correspondence of Joseph Justus Scaliger. Geneva.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (2006), An Introduction to Roman Tragedy. London.Google Scholar
Brachet, J. P. and Moussy, C. (eds.) (2006), Latin et langues techniques. Paris.Google Scholar
Braun, L. (1980), Scenae suppositiciae, oder Der falsche Plautus. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Bräunlich, A. F. (1920), The Indicative Indirect Question in Latin. Chicago.Google Scholar
Breed, B. B., Keitel, E. E. and Wallace, R. (eds.) (2018), Lucilius and Satire in Second-Century bc Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brender, F. (1920), Die rückläufige Ableitung im Lateinischen. Diss. Basel.Google Scholar
Breyer, G. (1993), Etruskisches Sprachgut im Lateinischen unter Ausschluss des spezifisch onomastischen Bereiches. Leuven.Google Scholar
Briggs, W. W. (1983), Concordantia in Varronis libros De re rustica. Hildesheim, Zurich and New York.Google Scholar
Briquel, D. (1984), Les Pélasges en Italie: recherches sur l’histoire de la légende. Paris and Rome.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. (1973), A Commentary on Livy, Books 31–33. Oxford.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. (1981), A Commentary on Livy, Books 34–37. Oxford.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. (1986), Titi Liui ab urbe condita libri xli–xlv. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. (1991), Titi Liui ab urbe condita libri xxxi–xl, 2 vols. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. (2005), ‘The Language and Style of the Fragmentary Republican Historians’, in Reinhardt, , Lapidge, and Adams, (2005), 53–72.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. (2008), A Commentary on Livy, Books 38–40. Oxford.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. (2012), A Commentary on Livy, Books 41–45. Oxford.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. (2016), Titi Liui ab urbe condita tomus iii libri xxi–xxv. Oxford.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. (2018), Liviana: Studies on Livy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brocato, P. (1995), ‘Lazio, Roma’, SE 60, 301–2.Google Scholar
Broise, H. and Scheid, J. (1993), ‘Étude d’un cas: le lucus deae Diae à Rome’, in de Cazanove, and Scheid, (1993), 145–57.Google Scholar
Brotherton, B. E. M. (1926), The Vocabulary of Intrigue in Roman Comedy. Diss. Chicago.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. (1950–1968), The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, 3 vols. New York and Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Brown, P. H., Joseph, B. D. and Wallace, R. (2009), ‘Questions and Answers’, in Baldi, and Cuzzolin, (2009–2014), 1. 489–530.Google Scholar
Bruder, H. (1970), Bedeutung und Funktion des Verswechsels bei Terenz. Zurich.Google Scholar
Bruni, S. and Cianferoni, G. C., (eds.) (2013), Dósis d’olige te phile te: studi per Antonella Romualdi. Florence.Google Scholar
Buescu, V. (1966), Cicéron, les Aratea. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Butler, C. (1985), Statistics in Linguistics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. J. (2008), ‘Sigmatic Ecthlipsis in Lucretius’, Hermes 136, 188–205.Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. J. (2013), The Early Textual History of Lucretius’ De rerum natura. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Butterfield, D. J. (ed.) (2015), Varro Varius: The Polymath of the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cabrillana, C. (2016), ‘Directives in Latin Comedy: Pragmatics, Dramatic Role and Social Status’, Journal of Latin Linguistics 15, 179–214.Google Scholar
Caiazza, D. (ed.) (2005), Italica ars: Studi in onore di Giovanni Colonna per il premio I Sanniti. Alife.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1978), Marci Porci Catonis Oratio pro Rhodiensibus: Catone, l’Oriente greco e gli imprenditori romani. Bologna.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1982), ‘La retorica preciceroniana e la politica a Roma’, in Ludwig, (1982), 41–100.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1986), ‘I modelli dell’arcaismo: M. Porcio Catone’, AION(ling) 8, 37–69.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1993), Cornifici Rhetorica ad C. Herennium, 2nd ed. Bologna.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1997), ‘Asindeto e polisindeto’, in Enciclopedia Oraziana, Volume ii (Rome), 799–803.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (ed.) (2005), Papers on Grammar ix, 2: Latina Lingua! Proceedings of the Twelfth International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Bologna, 9–14 June 2003. Rome.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (2006), ‘L’emploi de la proposition relative dans les textes juridiques latins’, in Brachet, and Moussy, (2006), 233–50.Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (2009), ‘Latin Syntax and Greek’, in Baldi, and Cuzzolin, (2009–2014), 1. 65–193.Google Scholar
Callebat, L. (1968), Sermo cotidianus dans les Métamorphoses d’Apulée. Caen.Google Scholar
Camporeale, G. (ed.) (1999), Incontro di studi in memoria di Massimo Pallotino. Pisa and Rome.Google Scholar
Camporeale, G. (2015), ‘L’arrivo dell’alfabeto in Etruria’, in Camporeale, G. (ed.), Gli Etruschi: Maestri di Scrittura (Milan), 18–25.Google Scholar
Caplan, H. (1954), Cicero: Rhetorica ad Herennium. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Caruso, C. (2012), ‘i.5 Un innamorato’, in Friggeri, , Granino Cecere, and Gregori, (2012), 29.Google Scholar
Cassard, J. (2005), ‘Les composés en -fer et en -ger dans les traités de rhétorique de l’époque républicaine’, in Moussy, (2005b), 179–96.Google Scholar
Caston, R. R. (2015), ‘Pacuuius hoc melius quam Sophocles: Cicero’s Use of Drama in the Treatment of the Emotions’, in Cairns, D. and Fulkerson, L. (eds.), Emotions between Greece and Rome (BICS Suppl. 125), 129–48.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, L. (1991), ‘Prosodia e metrica latina arcaica 1956–1990’, Lustrum 33, 227–400, 411–15.Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. (1998), C. Lucilii reliquiarum concordantiae. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. (2004), ‘The Roman Satirist Speaks Greek’, Classics Ireland 11, 1–46.Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. (2007), ‘Antiquity and Authority in Nonius Marcellus’, in Scourfield, (2007), 69–96.Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. (2010), ‘Idiom(s) and Literariness in Classical Literary Criticism’, in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010), 42–64.Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. (2011), ‘The Language of Latin Verse Satire’, in Clackson, (2011), 367–84.Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. (2018), ‘Verbal Mosaics: Speech Patterns and Generic Stylisation in Lucilius’, in Breed, , Keitel, and Wallace, , (2018), 132–61.Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. (2019), ‘Lucilius on Latin Spelling, Grammar and Usage’, in Pezzini, and Taylor, (2019), 46–78.Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. (2021), ‘The Language of Catullus’, in DuQuesnay, and Woodman, (2021), 116–42.Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. (1968–1980), Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque, 4 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Chapot, F. and Laurot, B. (2001), Corpus de prières grecques et romaines. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Charpin, F. (1978–1991) Lucilius, Satires. 3 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Chassignet, M. (1986), Caton: Les Origines (fragments). Paris.Google Scholar
Chrestien, F. (1605), Euripidis Cyclops Tragoedia Q. Septimio Florente Christiano interprete. Printed as an appendix to Casaubon, I. (1605), De Satyrica Graecorum poesi & Romanorum Satira libri duo, in quibus etiam poetae recensentur, qui in utraque poesi floruerunt. Paris.Google Scholar
Christenson, D. (2000), Plautus Amphitruo. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Churchill, J. B. (1996), The Elder Cato: A Philological Reassessment. Diss. Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Cifani, G. (ed.) (2013), Tra Roma e l’Etruria: Cultura, identità e territorio dei Falisci. Rome.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (ed.) (2003), Memoria e identità: La cultura romana costruisce la sua immagine. Florence.Google Scholar
Clackson, J. (ed.) (2011a), A Companion to the Latin Language. Malden and Oxford.Google Scholar
Clackson, J. (2011b), ‘Classical Latin’, in Clackson, (2011a), 236–56.Google Scholar
Clackson, J. (2016), ‘The Language of a Pompeian Tavern: Submerged Latin?’, in Adams, and Vincent, (2016), 69–86.Google Scholar
Clackson, J. and Horrocks, G. (2007), The Blackwell History of the Latin Language. Malden, MA, and Oxford.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. (1994), A Commentary on Virgil, Eclogues. Oxford.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (2011), Le origini di Roma: La cultura artistica dalle origini al III secolo a.C. Rome.Google Scholar
Cobet, C. G. (1860), ‘Livius nonnullis locis emendatus’, Mnemosyne 9, 298.Google Scholar
Coleman, R. (1999), ‘Poetic Diction, Poetic Discourse and the Poetic Register’, in Adams, and Mayer, (1999), 21–93.Google Scholar
Colonna, G. (1980a), ‘Appendice: le iscrizioni strumentali latine del VI e V secolo a.C.’, in Stibbe et al. (1980a), 53–69.Google Scholar
Colonna, G. (1980b), ‘Graeco more bibere: l’iscrizione della tomba 115 dell’Osteria dell’Osa’, Archaeologia Laziale 3, 51–5.Google Scholar
Colonna, G. (1988), ‘L’écriture dans l’Italie centrale à l’époque archaïque’, in Revue de la Société des élèves, anciens élèves et amis de la section des sciences religieuses de l’É.P.H.É (Paris), 22–31.Google Scholar
Colonna, G. (1995a), ‘Ager Signinus’, SE 60, 298–301.Google Scholar
Colonna, G. (1995b), ‘Lazio, Roma: Iscrizione latina arcaica dai pressi della Meta Sudans (valle dal Colosseo)’, SE 61, 347–50.Google Scholar
Colonna, G. (1999a), ‘L’iscrizione del biconico di Uppsala: Un documento del paleoumbro’, in Camporeale, (1999), 19–29.Google Scholar
Colonna, G. (1999b), ‘Epigrafi etrusche e latine a confronto’, in Atti dell’ XI Congresso Internazionale di Epigrafia Greca e Latina. Roma, 18–24 settembre 1997, 435–50.Google Scholar
Colonna, G. (2005), ‘Il cippo di Tragliatella (e questioni connesse)’, SE 71, 83–109.Google Scholar
Colonna, G. and Beijer, A. (1992), ‘Lazio, Satricum: Un’ iscrizione latina di VII secolo da Satricum’, SE 58, 316–20.Google Scholar
Colonna, G. and Gatti, S. (1992), ‘Anagni. Iscrizioni in dialetto ernico’, Studi Etruschi 58, 323–7.Google Scholar
Colonna, G. and Gnade, M. (2003), ‘Dolio con iscrizioni latine arcaiche da Satricum’, Archeologia classica 54, 1–21.Google Scholar
Conrad, C. (1965), ‘Traditional Patterns of Word-Order in Latin Epic from Ennius to Vergil’, HSPh 69, 195–258.Google Scholar
Conrad, F. (1931), ‘Die Deminutiva im Altlatein’, Glotta 20, 78–84.Google Scholar
Consoli, M. E. (2014), Quintus Ennius: Fortuna ed enigma. Lecce.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1982), Gaio Plinio Secondo Storia Naturale, vol. 1, Cosmologia e geografia: libri 1–6. Turin.Google Scholar
Conway, R. S. and Johnson, S. K. (1935), Titi Liui ab urbe condita tomus iv libri xxvi–xxx. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cook, A. B. (1902), ‘Unconscious Iterations (With Special Reference to Classical Literature)’, CR 16, 146–58, 256–67.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (2015), Sexing the World: Grammatical Gender and Biological Sex in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (1991), ‘The Tyranny of the Evidence: A Discussion of the Possible Uses of Literacy in Etruria and Latium in the Archaic Age’, in Humphrey, (1991), 7–33.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (1995), The Beginnings of Rome: Italy from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000–264 bc). London and New York.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (ed.) (2013), The Fragments of the Roman Historians, 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (2002), Writing Systems: An Introduction to Their Linguistic Analysis. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Coulter, C. C. (1916), ‘Compound Adjectives in Early Latin Poetry’, TAPhA 47, 153–72.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1991), The Poems of Petronius. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1995), Musa Lapidaria: A Selection of Latin Verse Inscriptions. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1999), Archaic Latin Prose. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (2003), The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford [1st ed. 1993].Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (2004), ‘The “Greek” Accusative’, CJ 99, 425–31.Google Scholar
Cova, P. V. et al. (eds.) (1986), Studi sulla lingua di Plinio il Vecchio. Milan.Google Scholar
Cova, P. V. (1986a), ‘La lingua di Plinio il Vecchio: Studi e problemi’, BStudLat 16, 47–54.Google Scholar
Cova, P. V. (1986b), ‘L’ablativo assoluto nella Naturalis Historia’, in Cova, et al. (1986), 13–142.Google Scholar
Crampon, M. (2000), ‘Création de mots chez Plaute’, in Fruyt, and Nicolas, (2000), 149–54.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H. (1974), Roman Republican Coinage, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H. (1996), Roman Statutes, 2 vols. London.Google Scholar
Cristofani, M. (1972), ‘Sull’origine e la diffusione dell’alfabeto etrusco’, ANRW 1.2, 466–89.Google Scholar
Cristofani, M. (1978), ‘Rapporto sulla diffusione della scrittura nell’Italia antica’, S&C 2, 5–33.Google Scholar
Cugusi, P. (1970–1979), Epistolographi Latini minores, 2 vols. Turin.Google Scholar
Cugusi, P. and Sblendorio Cugusi, M. T. (2001), Marco Porcio Catone Censore: Opere. Turin.Google Scholar
Cullhed, A. (2015), The Shadow of Creusa: Negotiating Fictionality in Late Antique Latin Literature. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. (ed.) (1988), The Temple of Sulis Minerva at Bath. Vol. 2: The Finds from the Sacred Spring. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cupaiuolo, G. (1963), Un capitolo sull’esametro latino. Naples.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, P. (2004), Rufini Antiochensis Commentaria in metra terentiana et de compositione et de numeris oratorum. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, P. (2012), Varrone e la tradizione metrica antica. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
D’Elia, M. (1976), ‘Sull’uso di ‘quod’ con il senso di ‘si’ nel latino giuridico’, in Scritti in onore di Giuliano Bonfante: Vol. 1 (Brescia), 191–204.Google Scholar
Danese, R. M., Gori, F., and Questa, C. (eds.) (1990), Metrica classica e linguistica: Atti del colloquio, Urbino 3–6 ottobre 1988. Urbino.Google Scholar
Danese, R. M. (2010), ‘Stile e sesso nei frammenti dell’Atellana letteraria’, in Raffaelli, and Tontini, (2010), 101–17.Google Scholar
Dangel, J. (1995), Accius, Œuvres. Paris.Google Scholar
Dangel, J. (ed.) (1994), Grammaire et rhétorique à Rome: notion de Romanité. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Daube, D. (1956), Forms of Roman Legislation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Daviault, A. (1981), Comoedia togata: fragments. Paris.Google Scholar
De Cazanove, O. (2000), ‘I destinatari dell’iscrizione di Tiriolo e la questione del campo di applicazione del Senatoconsulto de Bacchanalibus’, Athenaeum 88, 59–68.Google Scholar
De Cazanove, O. and Scheid, J. (eds.) (1993), Les bois sacrés: Actes du colloque international, Naples, 23–25 novembre 1989. Paris.Google Scholar
de Melo, W. D. C. (2006), ‘If in Doubt, Leave It in: Subject Accusatives in Plautus and Terence’, Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics 11, 5–20.Google Scholar
de Melo, W. D. C. (2007), The Early Latin Verb System: Archaic Forms in Plautus, Terence, and beyond. Oxford.Google Scholar
de Melo, W. D. C. (2009), ‘Scies (Mil. 520) e scibis (Mil. 1365): Variazione accidentale?’, in Raffaelli, and Tontini, (2009), 41–52.Google Scholar
de Melo, W. D. C. (2010a), ‘Possessive Pronouns in Plautus’, in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010), 71–99.Google Scholar
de Melo, W. D. C. (2010b), ‘The Language of Atellan Farce’, in Raffaelli, and Tontini, (2010), 89–123.Google Scholar
de Melo, W. D. C. (2011), ‘The Language of Roman Comedy’, in Clackson, (2011a), 321–43.Google Scholar
de Melo, W. D. C. (2011–2013), Plautus, 5 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
de Melo, W. D. C. (2014), ‘The Latin Saturnian Revisited: a Critical Look at Mercado’s Italic Verse, Followed by a Fresh Analysis of the Metre’, Kratylos 59, 53–81.Google Scholar
de Melo, W. D. C. (2019), Varro, De Lingua Latina: Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
de Melo, W. D. C. and Scullion, S. (eds.) (forthcoming), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Latin Textual Criticism. Oxford.Google Scholar
De Meo, C. (2005), Lingue tecniche del latino, 3rd ed. Bologna.Google Scholar
De Nonno, M. (1990), ‘Ruolo e funzione della metrica nei grammatici latini’, in Danese, , Gori, and Questa, (1990), 453–94.Google Scholar
De Nonno, M. (2010), ‘I grammatici e la tradizione dell’Atellana letteraria’, in Raffaelli, and Tontini, (2010), 37–67.Google Scholar
De Nonno, M. (2017), ‘Vetustas e antiquitas, ueteres e antiqui nei grammatici latini’, in Rocchi, and Mussini, (2007), 213–47.Google Scholar
De Pachtère, F. G. (1909), Musée de Guelma. Paris.Google Scholar
De Paolis, P. (2010), ‘L’insegnamento dell’ortografia latina fra Tardoantico e alto Medioevo: teorie e manuali’, in Del Corso, and Pecere, (2010), 229–91.Google Scholar
De Paolis, P. (2014), ‘Sordidi sermones uiri: Velio Longo, Flavio Capro e la lingua di Lucano’, in Piras, (2014), 97–109.Google Scholar
De Paolis, P. (2015), ‘La parentela linguistica fra greco e latino nella tradizione grammaticale latina’, in Haverling, (2015), 610–24.Google Scholar
De Simone, C. (1968–1970), Die griechische Entlehnung im Etruskischen, 2 vols. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
De Simone, C. (1968), ‘Zur altetruskischen Inschrift aus Rom (ni araziia laraniia)’, Glotta 46, 2007–12.Google Scholar
De Simone, C. (1972), ‘Per la storia degli imprestiti greci in etrusco’, ANRW 1.2, 490–521.Google Scholar
De Vaan, M. (2008), Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
De Vos Raiijmakers, M. and Pepe, C. (2015), ‘A New Funerary Epigram of a Syrian Migrant near Thugga (Africa Proconsularis), Tunisian tell’, ZPE 194, 73–9.Google Scholar
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R. (1975), ‘Un modulo del linguaggio critico di Cicerone (Brutus, 76)’, SIFC 47, 68–85.Google Scholar
Del Castillo Herrera, M. (2011), ‘Los infinitivos pasivos en -ier en la literatura latina: de Plauto a Juvenal’, Latomus 70, 51–66.Google Scholar
Del Corso, L. and Pecere, O. (eds.) (2010), Libri di scuola e pratiche didattiche. Dall’antichità al rinascimento. Cassino.Google Scholar
DeLancey, S. (1997), ‘Mirativity: The Grammatical Marking of Unexpected Information’, Linguistic Typology 1, 33–52.Google Scholar
Della Casa, A. (1969), Il Dubius sermo di Plinio. Genoa.Google Scholar
Della Casa, A. (1982), ‘Plinio grammatico’, in Plinio il Vecchio sotto il profilo storico e letterario. Atti del Convegno di Como, 5-6-7 ottobre 1979. Atti della Tavola rotonda nella ricorrenza centenaria della morte di Plinio il Vecchio, Bologna 16 dicembre 1979 (Como) (Como), 109–15.Google Scholar
Delvigo, M. L. (2013), ‘Servio e i ueteres’, in Stok, (2013), 83–100.Google Scholar
Den Boeft, J. et al. (2013), Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus xxix . Leiden.Google Scholar
Denizot, C. and Spevak, O. (eds.) (2017), Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Denniston, J. D. (1934), The Greek Particles. Oxford.Google Scholar
Desbordes, F. (1983), ‘Le schéma “addition, soustraction, mutation, métathèse” dans les textes anciens’, HEL 5, 23–30. (= Idées grecques et romaines sur le langage (Lyon 2007), 55–63).Google Scholar
Deufert, M. (2002), Textgeschichte und Rezeption der plautinischen Komödien im Altertum. Berlin.Google Scholar
Deufert, M. (2007), ‘Terenz und die altlateinische Verskunst: ein Beitrag zur Technik des Enjambements in der neuen Komödie’, in Kruschwitz, Ehlers and Felgentreu (2007), 51–71.Google Scholar
Deufert, M. (2010), ‘“Quid aliud est Plautina emendare quam ludere?”: Gottfried Hermanns Bedeutung für die Plautusphilologie des 19. Jahrhunderts’, in Sier, and Wockener-Gade, (2010), 277–97.Google Scholar
Deufert, M. (2014), ‘Metrics and Music’, in Fontaine, and Scafuro, (2014), 477–97.Google Scholar
Devoto, G. (1940), Storia della lingua di Roma. Bologna.Google Scholar
Di Napoli, M. (2011), Velii Longi De orthographia. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Dickey, E. (2002), Latin Forms of Address: from Plautus to Apuleius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dickey, E. (2018), ‘What Is a Loanword? The Case of Latin Borrowings and Codeswitches in Ancient Greek’, Lingue e linguaggio 17, 7–36.Google Scholar
Dickey, E. and Chahoud, A. (eds.) (2010), Colloquial and Literary Latin. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Diederich, S. (2005), ‘Das römische Agrarhandbuch als Medium der Selbstdarstellung’, in Fögen, (2005), 271–88.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1922), ‘Lukrezstudien v ’, Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophisch-historische Klasse, 46–59. (= Diels, 1969, 365–78).Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1969), Kleine Schriften zur Geschichte der antiken Philosophie, Burkert, W. (ed.). Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Dimsdale, M. S. (1889), Livy Book xxii. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dinter, M. T. (ed.) (2019), The Cambridge Companion to Roman Comedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dousa, F. (1597), C Lucillii Suessani Auruncani satyrographorum principis … Satyrarum quae supersunt reliquiae. Franciscus Iani f. Dousa collegit, disposuit et notas addidit. Leiden.Google Scholar
Drago Troccoli, L. (ed.) (2009), Il Lazio dai Colli Albani ai Monti Lepini tra preistoria ed età moderna. Rome.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. (1975), ‘Methodisches zu Allegro-Regeln’, in Dressler, and Mareš, (1975), 219–34.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. and Mareš, F. V. (eds.) (1975), Phonologica 1972: Akten der Zweiten Internationalen Phonologie-Tagung, Wien, 5.-8. September 1972. Munich.Google Scholar
Drexler, H. (1967), Einführung in die römische Metrik. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Drexler, H. (1969), Die Iambenkürzung: Kürzung der zweiten Silbe eines iambischen Wortes – eines iambischen Wortanfangs. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2005), Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2018), ‘Netting the Wolf-Fish: Gaius Titius in Macrobius and Cicero’, in Gray, et al. (2018), 135–50.Google Scholar
Dunbabin, K. M. D. (1989), ‘Baiarum grata voluptas: Pleasures and Dangers of the Baths’, PBSR 57, 6–46.Google Scholar
Dunkel, G. E. (1997), ‘Mono- and Disyllabic ā´ in the R̥gveda’, in Pirart, E. (ed.), Syntaxe des langues indo-iraniennes anciennes. Barcelona, 9–27.Google Scholar
Dunkel, G. E. (1998), ‘On the Short Vowel in the Name Ἡρακλῆς’, MH 55, 76–83.Google Scholar
Dupraz, E. (2011), Sabellian Demonstratives: Forms and Functions. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
DuQuesnay, I. M. le M. and Woodman, T. (eds.) (2021), The Cambridge Companion to Catullus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Durante, M. (1976), Sulla preistoria della tradizione poetica greca 2: Risultanze della comparazione indoeuropea. Rome.Google Scholar
Dutsch, D. (2008), Feminine Discourse in Roman Comedy: on Echoes and Voices. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. (2010), Cicero: Pro Sexto Roscio. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ebbeler, J. V. (2012), Disciplining Christians: Correction and Community in Augustine’s Letters. Oxford.Google Scholar
Eckert, A. (2018), ‘Roman Orators between Greece and Rome: The Case of Cato the Elder, L. Crassus, and M. Antonius’, in Gray, et al. (2018), 19–32.Google Scholar
Eichner, H. (1988–1990a), ‘Ein Heldendenkmal der Sabiner mit trochäischem Epigramm eines pikenischen Plautus des fünften Jahrhunderts v. Chr.’, Die Sprache 34, 198–206.Google Scholar
Eichner, H. (1988–1990b), ‘Reklameiamben aus Roms Königszeit’, Die Sprache 34, 207–38.Google Scholar
Eichner, H. (1995), ‘Zu frühlateinischen Wortformen auf dem Forumscippus CIL I2, 1’, in Ofitsch, and Zinko, (1995), 65–73.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. (2007), ‘The Voices of Ennius’ Annals’, in Fitzgerald, and Gowers, (2007), 38–54.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. (2013), Ennius and the Architecture of the Annales. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Emiliozzi, A. (2008), ‘Dialoghi prenestini su cista e specchio figurati’, Bollettino di Archeologia online i 2010/Volume speciale D/D5/3, 27–35.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. (1908–1909), ‘Recherches sur l’emploi du passif latin à l’époque républicaine’, Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 15, 273–333.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. (1936), Plaute 4: Menaechmi, Mercator, Miles Gloriosus. Paris.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. (1953), Morphologie historique du latin, 3rd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. (1954), Aspects du vocabulaire latin. Paris.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. (1957), Recueil de textes latins archaïques, 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. and Meillet, A. (1985), Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine: histoire des mots, 4th ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. and Robin, L. (1962), Lucrèce, De rerum natura: Commentaire exégétique et critique, précédé d’une introduction sur l’art de Lucrèce et d’une traduction des lettres et pensées d’Épicure, 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Estienne, R. and Estienne, H. (1564), Fragmenta poetarum ueterum Romanorum, quorum opera non extant… undique a Roberto Stephano summa diligentia olim congesta: nunc autem ab Henrico Stephano eius filio digesta, et priscarum quae in illis sunt uocum expositione illustrata: additis etiam alicubi uersibus Graecis quos interpretantur. Geneva.Google Scholar
Facchetti, G. M. (2016), ‘Tinas cliniiaras’, in Ancilotti, , Calderini, and Massarelli, (2016), 279–99.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. and Damon, C. (eds.) (2020), Ennius’ Annals: Poetry and History. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (1972), Il carme 61 di Catullo. Fribourg.Google Scholar
Fedriani, C. (2017), ‘Quapropter, quaeso? “Why, for pity’s sake?”’, in Denizot, C. and Spevak, O. (eds.), Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek (Amsterdam), 83–109.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2005), ‘Review: The Beginnings of a Literature in Latin’, JRS 95, 226–40.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2016), Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fehling, D. (1969), Die Wiederholungsfiguren und ihr Gebrauch bei den Griechen vor Gorgias. Berlin.Google Scholar
Ferrara, G. (1905), Della voce “Scutula”: nota di semantica latina. Milan.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (ed.) (2012), Leges publicae: La legge nell’esperienza giuridica romana. Pavia.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. and Gowers, E. (eds.) (2007), Ennius Perennis: The Annals and Beyond. Oxford.Google Scholar
Flach, D. (2005), Marcus Porcius Cato: Über den Ackerbau. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Flobert, P. (1975), Les verbes déponents latins des origines à Charlemagne. Paris.Google Scholar
Flobert, P. (1988), ‘Lingua Latina et lingua Romana: purisme, administration et invasions barbares’, Ktema 13, 205–12. (= Flobert 2014: 442–53).Google Scholar
Flobert, P. (1996), ‘Verbes supports en latin’, in Bammesberger, and Heberlein, (1996), 193–9.Google Scholar
Flobert, P. (2009), ‘Le chapitre de Priscien sur la voix et la diathèse (GL 2,373–404)’, in Baratin, , Colombat, and Holtz, (2009), 331–40.Google Scholar
Flobert, P. (2014), Grammaire comparée et variétés du latin: Articles revus et mis à jour (1964–2012). Geneva.Google Scholar
Flores, E. (2014), Commentario a Cn. Naevi Bellum Poenicum. Naples.Google Scholar
Flores, E. et al. (2002), Quinto Ennio, Annali (libri I–VIII): Volume 2 Commentari. Naples.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (ed.) (2005), Antike Fachtexte/Ancient Technical Texts. Berlin.Google Scholar
Fontaine, M. (2006), ‘Sicilicissitat (Plautus, Menaechmi 12) and Early Geminate Writing in Latin (with an Appendix on Men. 13)’, Mnemosyne 59, 95–110.Google Scholar
Fontaine, M. (2010), Funny Words in Plautine Comedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. C. (eds.) (2014), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fordyce, C. J. (1961), Catullus: A Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fortini, P. (2005), ‘Una nuova iscrizione latina arcaica dal Foro Romano (area del cd. Equus Domitiani)’, in Caiazza, (2005), 267–76.Google Scholar
Fortson, B. W. (2008), Language and Rhythm in Plautus. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Fortson, B. W. (2011a), ‘Latin Prosody and Metrics’, in Clackson, (2011a), 92–104.Google Scholar
Fortson, B. W. (2011b), ‘The Historical Background to Latin within the Indo-European Language Family’, in Clackson, (2011b), 199–219.Google Scholar
Fortson, B. W. (2017), ‘The Dialectology of Italic’, in Klein, , Joseph, and Fritz, (2017), 835–58.Google Scholar
Fortson, B. W. and Potter, D. (2011), ‘A Fragmentary Early Republican Public Inscription from Gabii’, ZPE 178, 255–60.Google Scholar
Fournier, N. (1998), ‘Les termes en qu- et l’opposition animé / non animé’, IG 78, 4–12.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (2002), Lucretius on Atomic Motion: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura, Book Two, Lines 1–332. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1917), ‘Das Geschlecht von dies’, Glotta 8, 24–68 (= Fraenkel 1964: 1.26–72).Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1931), ‘Livius Andronicus’, RE Supplementum 5, 598–607.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1956), ‘Eine Form römischer Kriegsbulletins’, Eranos 54, 189–94 (= Fraenkel 1964: 2.69–73).Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1964), Kleine Beiträge zur classischen Philologie, 2 vols. Rome.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (1968), Leseproben aus Reden Ciceros und Catos. Rome.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (2007), Plautine Elements in Plautus, transl. T. Drevikovsky and F. Muecke. Oxford (1st ed. German ed. Berlin 1922; Italian ed. Florence 1960).Google Scholar
Franchi de Bellis, A. (2005), Iscrizioni prenestine su specchi e ciste. Alessandria.Google Scholar
Frassinetti, P. (1967), Atellanae Fabulae, 2nd ed. Rome.Google Scholar
Friggeri, R., Granino Cecere, M. G., and Gregori, G. L. (eds.) (2012), Terme di Diocleziano: La collezione epigrafica. Rome.Google Scholar
Frisk, H. (1960–1972), Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, 3 vols. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Fruyt, M. (2002), ‘Constraints and Productivity in Latin Nominal Compounding’, TPhS 100, 259–97.Google Scholar
Fruyt, M. (2005), ‘Le statut des composés nominaux dans le lexique latin’, in Moussy, (2005b), 29–54.Google Scholar
Fruyt, M. (2011a), ‘Word-Formation in Classical Latin’, in Clackson, (2011a), 157–75.Google Scholar
Fruyt, M. (2011b), ‘Grammaticalization in Latin’, in Baldi, and Cuzzolin, (2009–2014), 4. 661–864.Google Scholar
Fruyt, M. and Moussy, C. (eds.) (1996), Structures lexicales du latin. Paris.Google Scholar
Fruyt, M. and Nicolas, C. (eds.) (2000), La création lexicale en latin. Paris.Google Scholar
Fruyt, M. and Van Laer, S. (eds.) (2008), Adverbes et évolution linguistique en latin. Paris.Google Scholar
Funaioli, G. (1907), Grammaticae Romanae Fragmenta. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Gaertner, J. F. and Hausburg, B. (2013), Caesar and the Bellum Alexandrinum. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Gagnér, A. (1920), De ‘hercle’ ‘mehercle’ ceterisque id genus particulis priscae poesis latinae scaenicae. Greifswald.Google Scholar
Gaide, F. (1988), Les substantifs masculins latins en …(i)ō, …(i)ōnis. Louvain and Paris.Google Scholar
Galdi, G. (2018), ‘On the Use of facio as Support Verb in Late and Merovingian Latin’, Journal of Latin Linguistics 17, 231–57.Google Scholar
Gale, M. (1994), Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Garcea, A. (2012a), Caesar’s De Analogia: Edition, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Garcea, A. (2012b), ‘Probus et l’accent’, REL 90, 245–51.Google Scholar
Garcea, A. (2019), ‘Cornificius, Varro and the quadripertita ratio’, in Swiggers, (2019), 247–56.Google Scholar
Garcea, A. and Lomanto, V. (2004), ‘Aulus Gellius and Fronto on Loan Words and Literary Models: Their Evaluation of Laberius’, in Holford-Strevens, and Vardi, (2004), 41–64.Google Scholar
Garcea, A., Lhommé, M. K., and Vallat, D. (eds.) (2013), Polyphonia Romana: Hommages à Frédérique Biville. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Garcea, A., Lhommé, M. K., and Vallat, D. (eds.) (2016), Fragments d’érudition. Servius et le savoir antique. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Garcea, A., Rosellini, M., and Silvano, L. (eds.) (2019), Latin in Byzantium I: Late Antiquity and Beyond. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Gasperin, i, L. (1970) ‘La più antica dedica a Dite’, Epigraphica 32, 35–49.Google Scholar
Gee, E. (2013a), Aratus and the Astronomical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gee, E. (2013b), ‘Cicero’s Poetry’ in Steel, (2013), 88–106.Google Scholar
Georgescu, T. (2019), ‘Les mots latins d’origine grecque avec diffusion panromane: comment et pourquoi?’, in Holmes, N. et al. (eds.) (2019), Lemmata Linguistica Latina Volume I: Words and Sounds (Berlin), 277–93.Google Scholar
Ghini, G. (ed.) (2009), ‘Su due iscrizioni protoitaliche dal tempo delle Stimmate a Velletri’, in Ghini, G. (ed.), Lazio e Sabina 5, Scoperte, scavi e ricerche: atti del convegno quinto incontro di studi sul Lazio e la Sabina, Roma 3–5 dicembre 2007 (Rome), 325–30.Google Scholar
Gigante Lanzara, V. (2000) Licofrone: Alessandra. Milan.Google Scholar
Gitner, A. (2015), ‘Varro Aeolicus: Latin’s Affiliation with Greek’, in Butterfield, (2015), 33–50.Google Scholar
Glareanus, H. (1540), T. Livi Patavini Historiarum Ab Urbe Condita Libri. Basel.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. and Burnett, C. S. F. (eds.) (2012), Greek into Latin from Antiquity until the Nineteenth Century. London.Google Scholar
Godwin, J. (2014), Metamorphoses III: An Extract 511–733. London.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (1983), ‘Terence, Cato, and the Rhetorical Prologue’, CPh 78, 198–211.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (1995), Epic in Republican Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (2005), Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (2010), ‘Fact, Fiction and Form in Early Roman Epic’, in Konstan, and Raaflaub, (2010), 167–84.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (2018), ‘Lucilius and the poetae seniores’, in Breed, , Keitel, and Wallace, (2018), 39–56.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. and Manuwald, G. (2017), Fragmentary Republican Latin i : Ennius, Testimonia. Epic Fragments. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. and Manuwald, G. (2018), Fragmentary Republican Latin ii : Ennius, Dramatic Fragments; Minor Works. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Goold, G. P. (1989), Catullus, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Grafton, A. (1983), Joseph Scaliger. A Study in the History of Classical Scholarship. i. Textual Criticism and Exegesis. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. (1982a), ‘Ennius the Hellenistic Poet: Epic Diction and Verse’, in Kenney, and Clausen, (1982), 66–75.Google Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. (1982b), ‘The Form and Verse of Roman Drama’, in Kenney, and Clausen, (1982), 84–93.Google Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. (1993), Plautus Menaechmi. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. (1999), Terence The Brothers, 2nd ed. Warminster (1st ed. 1987).Google Scholar
Gray, C. et al. (eds.) (2018), Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gross, G. (1993), ‘Les passifs nominaux’, Langages 109, 103–25.Google Scholar
Gross, G. (2004), ‘Pour un Bescherelle de prédicats nominaux’, in Gross, and Pontonx, (2004), 343–58.Google Scholar
Gross, G. and Pontonx, S. (eds.) (2004), Verbes supports: Nouvel état des lieux. Paris.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1990), Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Leiden (repr. Berkeley 1996).Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1992), Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Gsell, S. (1922), Inscriptions latines de l’Algérie. Tome premier: inscriptions de la proconsulaire. Paris.Google Scholar
Gsell, S. and Joly, C. A. (1914), Khamissa, Mdaourouch, Announa: fouilles exécutées par le Service des Monuments Historiques de l’Algérie. Première partie: Khamissa. Paris.Google Scholar
Guardì, T. (1974), Cecilio Stazio: I frammenti. Palermo.Google Scholar
Guardì, T. (1995), ‘Afranio in Nonio’, Pan 13, 17–37.Google Scholar
Guldager, P. and Poulsen, B. (2008), The Temple of Castor and Pollux, ii, 1: The Finds. Rome.Google Scholar
Gunkel, D. et al. (eds.) (2018), Vina Diem Celebrent: Studies in Linguistics and Philology in Honor of Brent Vine. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Haack, M.-L. (ed.) (2009), Écritures, cultures, sociétés dans les nécropoles d’Italie ancienne. Pessac.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. (2006), ‘The Wisdom of Ennius’, Arethusa 39, 471–88.Google Scholar
Hackstein, O. (2014), ‘Univerbierung und irreguläre Reduktion in temporalen Adverbien: uridg. ges-tern von Bopp bis heute’, in Melchert, H. C., Rieken, E., and Steer, T. (eds.), Munus amicitiae Norbert Oettinger a collegis et amicis datum. Ann Arbor, MI, 32–45.Google Scholar
Hackstein, O. and Gunkel, D. (eds.) (2018), Language and Meter. Leiden.Google Scholar
Haffter, H. (1934), Untersuchungen zur altlateinischen Dichtersprache. Berlin.Google Scholar
Haffter, H. (1969), Terenzio e la sua personalità artistica, transl. D. Nardo. Rome.Google Scholar
Hagendahl, H. (1967), Augustine and the Latin Classics, 2 vols. Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Hahn, E. A. (1960), ‘The Origin of the Greek Accusative in Latin’, TAPhA 91, 221–38.Google Scholar
Hall, J. (2009), Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. Oxford.Google Scholar
Halla-aho, H. (2019), ‘Proleptic Accusatives in Latin’, Glotta 95, 135–58.Google Scholar
Halla-aho, H. and Kruschwitz, P. (2010), ‘Colloquial and Literary Latin in Early Roman Tragedy’, in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010), 127–53.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. (2018), ‘Oratorum Romanarum Fragmenta Liberae Rei Publicae: The Letter of Cornelia, Mater Gracchorum, and the Speeches of Her Father and Son’, in Gray, et al. (2018), 309–18.Google Scholar
Halm, K. (1863), Rhetores Latini Minores. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Handford, S. A. (1947), The Latin Subjunctive: Its Usage and Development from Plautus to Tacitus. London.Google Scholar
Hanssen, J. S. T. (1953), Latin Diminutives. A Semantic Study. Bergen.Google Scholar
Happ, H. (1967), ‘Die lateinische Umgangssprache und die Kunstsprache des Plautus’, Glotta 45, 60–104.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1986), Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harries, B. (2007), ‘Acting the Part: Techniques of the Comic Stage in Cicero’s Early Speeches’, in Booth, (2007), 129–47.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (1989), Ancient Literacy. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Harrison, G. W. M. (ed.) (2015), Brill’s Companion to Roman Tragedy. Leiden.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. (2002), ‘Ennius and the Prologue to Lucretius DRN (1.1–148)’, LICS 1, 1–13.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2004), Apuleius: A Latin Sophist. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harsh, P. W. (1959), ‘Early Latin Meter and Prosody’, Lustrum 3, 215–50.Google Scholar
Hartmann, M. (2005), Die frühlateinischen Inschriften und ihre Datierung. Bremen.Google Scholar
Hasenmüller, J. (1864), ‘Die Formel der heiligen Frühlingsweihe. (zu Liv. xxii. 10)’, RhM 19, 402–9.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2004a), ‘Coordinating Constructions: An Overview’, in Haspelmath (2004b), 3–39.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (ed.) (2004b), Coordinating Constructions. Amsterdam and Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. and Tadmor, U. (eds.) (2009), Loanwords in the World’s Languages: A Comparative Handbook. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hassall, M. W. C. and Tomlin, R. S. O. (1989), ‘Roman Britain in 1988. ii. Inscriptions’, Britannia 20, 327–45.Google Scholar
Hassall, M. W. C. and Tomlin, R. S. O. (1992), ‘Roman Britain in 1991. ii. Inscriptions’, Britannia 23, 309–23.Google Scholar
Hassall, M. W. C. and Tomlin, R. S. O. (1995), ‘Roman Britain in 1994. ii. Inscriptions’, Britannia 26, 371–90.Google Scholar
Haugen, K. L. (2011), Richard Bentley: Poetry and Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Haverling, G. (ed.) (2015), Latin Linguistics in the Early 21st Century. Acts of the 16th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Havers, W. (1911), Untersuchungen zur Kasussyntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Strassburg.Google Scholar
Havet, L. (1880), De Saturnio Latinorum uersu. Paris.Google Scholar
Havet, L. (1895), Phaedri Augusti liberti Fabulae Aesopiae. Paris.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (2009), Introductory Phonology. Malden, Oxford, and Chichester.Google Scholar
Heick, O. W. (1936), The Ab Urbe Condita Construction in Latin. Lincoln, NB.Google Scholar
Heikkinen, S. (2014), ‘The Resurrection and Afterlife of an Archaic Metre: Bede, the Carolingians and the Trochaic Septenarius’, C&M 65, 241–81.Google Scholar
Heinsius, D. (1643), De tragoediae constitutione liber, in quo inter cetera tota de hac Aristotelis sententia dilucide explicatur. 2nd ed. Leiden (1st ed. 1611).Google Scholar
Heinze, R. (1897), T. Lucretius Carus: De rerum natura Buch iii . Leipzig.Google Scholar
Helttula, A. (1985), ‘Post depositum militiae munus’, in Studia in honorem Iiro Kajanto (Helsinki), 41–56.Google Scholar
Henzen, G. (1874), Acta fratrum Arualium quae supersunt. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hermann, G. (1816), Elementa doctrinae metricae. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hertz, M. (1855), Prisciani grammatici Caesariensis institutionum grammaticarum libri xviii . Leipzig.Google Scholar
Heusinger, K. (1821), Livius. Römische Geschichte. Übersetzung mit kritischen und erklärenden Anmerkungen. Braunschweig.Google Scholar
Hickson, F. V. (1993), Roman Prayer Language: Livy and the Aneid [sic] of Vergil. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hilka, A., Schumann, O. and Meyer, W. (1970), Carmina Burana: Band i, Text. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Hill, J. (2021), ‘True Friendship: Ennius and Other Poets in Catullus 116’, TAPhA 151, 155–84.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998), Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hine, H. (2005), ‘Poetic Influence on Prose: The Case of the Younger Seneca’, in Reinhardt, , Lapidge, and Adams, (2005), 211–37.Google Scholar
Hoff, F. (1979), Le système linguistique de l’interrogation en latin classique. Diss. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, R. (1996), ‘Funktionsverbgefüge im Lateinischen’, in Bammesberger, and Heberlein, (1996), 200–12.Google Scholar
Hofmann, J. B. (1951), Lateinische Umgangssprache, 3rd ed. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Hofmann, J. B. and Ricottilli, L. (2003), La lingua d’uso latina, 3rd ed. Bologna (2nd ed. 1985, 1st ed. 1980 = Hofmann, 1951).Google Scholar
Hofmann, J. B. and Szantyr, A. (1965), Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. (1976), ‘Elocutio nouella’, CQ 26, 140–1.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. (2003), Aulus Gellius: an Antonine Scholar and his Achievement, 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. (2010), ‘Current and Ancient Colloquial in Gellius’, in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010), 331–8.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. (2017), ‘Fronto’s and Gellius’ Veteres’, in Rocchi, and Mussini, (2007), 199–211.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. and Vardi, A. (eds.) (2004), The Worlds of Aulus Gellius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Horn, W. (1924), ‘Beobachtungen über Sprachkörper und Sprachfunktion’, in Horn, W. (ed.), Beiträge zur germanischen Sprachwissenschaft: Festschrift für Otto Behaghel. Heidelberg, 58–82.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (2015), Lycophron, Alexandra. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (2018), Lycophron’s Alexandra, Rome, and the Hellenistic World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (2003), Virgil, Aeneid 11: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (ed.) (1988), Vir bonus discendi peritus: Studies in Celebration of Otto Skutsch. London.Google Scholar
Hough, J. N. (1934), ‘The Use of Greek Words by Plautus’, AJPh 55, 346–64.Google Scholar
Housman, A. E. (1927), M. Annaei Lucani Belli civilis libri decem, 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Howley, J. A. (2014), ‘Valuing the Mediators of Antiquity in the Noctes Atticae’, in Ker, and Pieper, (2014), 465–84.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. (2002), ‘Syntactic Overview’, in Huddleston, and Pullum, (2002), 43–69.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. K. (eds.) (2002), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R., Payne, J. and Peterson, P. (2002), ‘Coordination and Supplementation’, in Huddleston, and Pullum, (2002), 1273–1362.Google Scholar
Humphrey, J. H. (ed.) (1991), Literacy in the Roman World. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2013), Greek to Latin: Frameworks and Contexts for Intertextuality. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hyart, C. (1954), Les origines du style indirect latin et son emploi jusqu’à l’époque de César. Brussels.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960), ‘Concluding Statement: Linguistics and Poetics’, in Sebeok, (1960), 350–77.Google Scholar
Jamison, S. W., Welchert, H. C., and Vine, B. (eds.) (2013), Proceedings of the 24th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference. Bremen.Google Scholar
Jiménez López, M. D. (2017), ‘On Support Verb Constructions in Ancient Greek’, AGI 101, 180–204.Google Scholar
Jiménez Martínez, M. I. (2016), Colocaciones y verbos soporte en latín: sintaxis y semántica de pono. Madrid.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1967), The Tragedies of Ennius. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1969), ‘Chrysalus and the Fall of Troy (Plautus, Bacchides 925–978)’, HSPh 73, 135–52.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1972), ‘Ennius as a Dramatic Poet’, in Skutsch, (1972), 39–88.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1973), ‘Greek Poetry in Cicero’s Prose Writing’, YCS 23, 61–112.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1984–1985), ‘The Annotations of M. Valerius Probus, i – iii ’, CQ 34, 464–72, 35, 149–61.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1999), ‘The Arrangement and the Language of Catullus’ So-Called Polymetra with Special Reference to the Sequence 10–11–12’, in Adams, and Mayer, (1999), 335–75.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. C., Coleman-Norton, P. R. and Bourne, F. C. (1961), Ancient Roman Statutes. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. C. (2015), ‘Another Early Fragmentary Public Inscription from Gabii’, ZPE 195, 255–8.Google Scholar
Jordan, H. (1860), M. Catonis praeter librum de re rustica quae extant. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Julia, M. A. (2013), ‘Sur ecce et quelques présentatifs des langues anciennes’. Paper presented at the Seventeenth International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Rome, 20–25 May 2013.Google Scholar
Julia, M. A. (2018), Les présentatifs dans les langues anciennes et modernes. Beau Bassin.Google Scholar
Kahle, W. (1918), De vocabulis Graecis Plauti aetate in sermonem latinum vere receptis. Münster.Google Scholar
Kaimio, J. (1979), The Romans and the Greek Language. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Kalb, W. (1912), Wegweiser in die römische Rechtssprache. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kalinka, E. (1925), ‘Siremps’, Philologische Wochenschrift 40, 1133–6.Google Scholar
Kamphausen, P. (2014), Die Luciliusausgabe des Franciscus Dousa (1597) in ihrem gelehrten Umfeld. Trier.Google Scholar
Karakasis, E. (2005), Terence and the Language of Roman Comedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Karakasis, E. (2011), Song Exchange in Roman Pastoral. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Karakasis, E. (2014), ‘The Language of the Palliata’, in Fontaine, and Scafuro, (2014), 555–79.Google Scholar
Karaseva, T. A. (2009), ‘Slova ENOS LASES IUVATE v Arval’skom gimne’, in Bondarko, and Kazanskij, (2009), 246–8.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (1995), C. Suetonius Tranquillus De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (2011a), Macrobii Ambrosii Theodosii Saturnalia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (2011b), Macrobius: Saturnalia, 3 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Kauer, R. and Lindsay, W. M. (1958), P. Terenti Afri Comoediae, 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Keil, G. (1889), De Flauio Capro grammatico quaestionum capita ii . Halle.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1972), The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, 300 b.c.– a.d. 300. Princeton.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. and Clausen, W. (eds.) (1982), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature: Vol. 2 Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ker, J. and Pieper, C. (eds.) (2014), Valuing the Past in the Greco-Roman World. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Kerkhecker, A. (2001), ‘Zur internen Gattungsgeschichte der römischen Epik: das Beispiel Ennius’, in Schmidt, (2001), 39–88.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, M. (1998), ‘Speech Act Sequences in Latin Prose: Questions and Answers’, in Ternes, and Longrée, (1998), 66–86.Google Scholar
Kircher-Durand, C. (ed.) (2002), Création lexicale: la formation des noms par dérivation suffixale. Leuven.Google Scholar
Kiss, S., Mondin, L., and Salvi, G. (eds.) (2005), Latin et langues romanes: Études de linguistique offertes à József Herman. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Klein, J. S., Joseph, B. D., and Fritz, M. (eds.) (2017), Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics, 3 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. and Foss, C. (eds.) (1998), Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Köhm, J. (1905), Altlateinische Forschungen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kondratieff, E. (2004), ‘The Column and Coinage of C. Duilius: Innovations in Large and Small Media in the Middle Republic’, SCI 23, 1–39.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2010), ‘Fact, Fiction and Form in Early Roman Epic’, in Konstan, and Raaflaub, (2010), 167–84.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. and Raaflaub, K. (eds.) (2010), Epic and History. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Kotula, T. (1969), ‘Utraque lingua eruditi: Une page relative à l’histoire de l’éducation dans l’Afrique romaine’, in Bibauw, (1969), 386–92.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. S. (1992), ‘How (Not?) to End a Sentence: The Problem of -que’, HSPh 94, 321–9.Google Scholar
Krause, A. (1833), Vitae et fragmenta veterum historicorum Romanorum. Berlin.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. (2013), ‘The Poetics of Naevius’ “Epitaph” and the History of Latin Poetry’, JRS 103, 46–64.Google Scholar
Kruschwitz, P. (2002), Carmina saturnia epigraphica: Einleitung, Text und Kommentar zu den saturnischen Versinschriften. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Kruschwitz, P. (2007), Die metrischen Inschriften der römischen Republik. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kruschwitz, P., Ehlers, W.-W., and Felgentreu, F. (eds.) (2007), Terentius Poeta. Munich.Google Scholar
Kubik, I. (1887), De M. Tullii Ciceronis poetarum Latinorum studiis. Leipzig and Prague.Google Scholar
Kühn, C. G. (1821–1833), Claudii Galeni opera omnia. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kühner, R. and Holzweissig, F. (1912), Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache 1: Elementar-, Formen- und Wortlehre, 2nd ed. Hanover.Google Scholar
Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. (1955), Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache: Satzlehre, 3rd ed., 2 vols. Leverkusen.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, W. A. (1959), ‘Cicero, Plautus and Terence’, Proceedings of the African Classical Association 2, 21–4.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, W. A. (1960), ‘Cicero and the Stage’, Hermathena 94, 56–66.Google Scholar
Laks, A. and Most, G. W. (2016), Early Greek Philosophy 2: Beginnings and Early Ionian Thinkers, Part 1. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Landgraf, G. (1914), Kommentar zu Ciceros Rede Pro Sex. Roscio Amerino, 2nd ed. Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar
Langslow, D. R. (2000), Medical Latin in the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Langslow, D. R. (2009), Jacob Wackernagel, Lectures on Syntax: With Special Reference to Greek, Latin, and Germanic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Latte, K. (1960), Römische Religionsgeschichte. Munich.Google Scholar
Laughton, E. (1964), The Participle in Cicero. Oxford.Google Scholar
Laurenberg, J. (1610), Pompeius, edited by Beck, J. F. (2012), Fabulae Neolatinae. Regensburg (www.uni-regensburg.de/assets/sprache-literatur-kultur/lateinische-philologie/fabulae-neolatinae/praetextae/laurenberg__pompeius.pdf, last accessed 17 April 2021).Google Scholar
Lauriola, R. and Demetriou, K. N. (eds.) (2015), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Euripides. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. (1998), Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study, transl. M. T. Bliss, C. Orth and A. Jansen. Leiden.Google Scholar
Lavency, M. and Longrée, D. (eds.) (1989), Actes du Ve Colloque de Linguistique latine. Leuven.Google Scholar
Lazzeroni, R. (1956), ‘La geminatio vocalium nelle iscrizioni latine’, ASNP 25, 124–35.Google Scholar
Lazzeroni, R. (1972), ‘Contatti di lingue e culture nell’Italia antica: elementi greci nei dialetti italici’, Studi e saggi linguistici 12, 1–24.Google Scholar
Lazzeroni, R. (1983), ‘Contatti di lingue e di culture nell’Italia antica: Modelli egemoni e modelli subordinati nelle iscrizioni osche in grafia greca’, AION(ling) 5, 171–82.Google Scholar
Le Bonniec, H. (1972), Pline l’Ancien, Histoire Naturelle, Livre xviii . Paris.Google Scholar
Le Goffic, P. (1994), ‘Indéfini, interrogatif, relatif (termes en qu-): parcours avec ou sans issue’, Faits de langues 4, 31–40.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D. (1963), Orationis Ratio: The Stylistic Theories and Practice of the Roman Orators, Historians, and Philosophers. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (2010), ‘Atellana e palliata: gli influssi reciproci’, in Raffaelli, and Tontini, (2010), 15–36.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (1984). Der Relativsatz. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Lelièvre, F. J. (1958), ‘Sosia and Roman Epic’, Phoenix 12, 117–24.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1895–1896), Plauti Comoediae, 2nd ed., 2 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Leo, F. (1897), Die plautinischen Cantica und die hellenistische Lyrik. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Leonardis, I. (2014), ‘Vetustas, obliuio e crisi d’identità nelle Saturae Menippeae: Il risveglio di Varrone in un’altra Roma’, Έπέκεινα. International Journal of Ontology: History and Critics 4, 19–58.Google Scholar
Leonardis, I. (2019), Ego, unus scilicet antiquorum hominum: senso del passato e pratica antiquaria in Varrone. Bari.Google Scholar
Leonhardt, J. (1989), Dimensio syllabarum: Studien zur lateinischen Prosodie- und Verslehre von der Spätantike bis zur frühen Renaissance. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Leumann, M. (1949), ‘Schwer erkennbare griechische Wörter im Latein’, Die Sprache 1, 204–12.Google Scholar
Leumann, M. (1959), ‘Die lateinische Dichtersprache’, in Kleine Schriften (Zurich and Stuttgart), 131–56.Google Scholar
Leumann, M. (1974), ‘La lingua poetica latina’, in Lunelli, A. (ed.), La lingua poetica Latina (Bologna), 131–78 (= Leumann 1959).Google Scholar
Leumann, M. (1977), Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre, 6th ed. Munich (1st ed. 1926–1928).Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1983), Pragmatics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lindholm, E. (1931), Stilistische Studien zur Erweiterung der Satzglieder im Lateinischen. Lund.Google Scholar
Lindner, T. (2002), Lateinische Komposita: Morphologische, historische und lexikalische Studien. Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. (1901), Nonius Marcellus’ Dictionary of Republican Latin. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. (1902), ‘The Emendation of the Text of Nonius’, CR 16, 46–52.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. (1903), Nonii Marcelli De Compendiosa Doctrina. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. (1907), Syntax of Plautus. Oxford (repr. New York 1936).Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. (1913), Sexti Pompei Festi De verborum significatu quae supersunt cum Pauli epitome. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Lipp, R. (2016), ‘Neuna Fata: La filatrice del destino caduta in oblio’, in Ancilotti, , Calderini, and Massarelli, (2016), 429–44.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. (1924–1933), Lexicon Plautinum, 2 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Löfstedt, B. (2000), Ausgewählte Aufsätze zur lateinischen Sprachgeschichte und Philologie. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Lomanto, V. (1994), ‘Il sistema del sermo latinus in Quintiliano’, in Bàrberi Squarotti, (1994), 237–56.Google Scholar
López Martín, I. (2016), Las colocaciones verbo-nominales en latín y en griego: estudio comparado de César y Jenofonte. Diss. Madrid.Google Scholar
López Moreda, S. (1987), Los grupos lexemáticos de facio y ago en el latín arcaico y clásico: Estudio estructural. León.Google Scholar
Luchs, A. (1887), Emendationum Liuianarum particula tertia. Erlangen.Google Scholar
Luck, G. (1964), Über einige Interjektionen der lateinischen Umgangssprache. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Ludwig, W. (ed.) (1982), Eloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron: sept exposés suivis de discussions. Geneva.Google Scholar
Luiselli, B. (1965), ‘Sul frammento del “Limon” ciceroniano’, StudUrb 39, 110–24.Google Scholar
Luiselli, B. (1969), Il problema della più antica prosa latina. Cagliari.Google Scholar
MacCary, W. T. and Willcock, M. M. (1976), Plautus: Casina. Cambridge.Google Scholar
MacCormack, S. (2013), ‘Cicero in Late Antiquity’, in Steel, (2013), 251–305.Google Scholar
Madvig, J. N. (1865), Titi Livii historiarum Romanarum libri qui supersunt, 3.2. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Magallón García, A. I. (2002), ‘El Comentario a Terencio de Donato: la lengua de Terencio y los ueteres’, Revista de Estudios Latinos 2, 17–32.Google Scholar
Maggiani, A. (1999), ‘Una iscrizione “Paleoumbra” da Chiusi’, Rivista di Archeologia 23, 64–71.Google Scholar
Maggiani, A. (2016), ‘The Vicchio Stele: The Inscription’, Etruscan Studies 19, 220–4.Google Scholar
Magni, E. (2010), ‘Mood and Modality’, in Baldi, and Cuzzolin, (2009–2014), 2. 193–275.Google Scholar
Maiden, M., Smith, J. C. and Ledgeway, A. (eds.) (2011), The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages. Vol. 1: Structures. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Malcovati, E. (1943), Cicerone e la poesia. Pavia.Google Scholar
Malcovati, E. (1976), Oratorum Romanorum fragmenta, 4th ed. Turin.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1923), ‘The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages’, in Ogden, and Richards, (1923), 296–336.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (1979), ‘Linguistic Characterization of Old Men in Terence’, CPh 74, 136–47.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (1985), ‘The Distribution of Greek Loan-Words in Terence’, CQ 35, 110–23.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (1995), ‘The Distribution of Greek Loan-Words in Plautus’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8, 31–69.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (2014), ‘Donatus on “Appropriate Style” in the Plays of Terence’, in Papaioannou, (2014), 201–22.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (2016), ‘Discussion of Diachronic Linguistic Change in Servius’, in Garcea, , Lhommé, and Vallat, (2016), 155–69.Google Scholar
Mancini, M. (2016), ‘I grammatici, lo standard e il latino arcaico’, in Benedetti, et al. (2016), 85–140.Google Scholar
Mandolfo, C. (1998), ‘Aspetti linguistici negli Annales di Ennio’, SicGymn 51, 555–82.Google Scholar
Mannino, F., Mannino, M. and Maras, D. F. (eds.) (2009), Theodor Mommsen e il Lazio antico: giornata di studi in memoria dell’illustre storico, epigrafista e giurista (Terracina, Sala Valadier, 3 aprile 2004). Rome.Google Scholar
Mantero, T. (1975), ‘La inscriptio dei codici del De compendiosa doctrina e Nonius Marcellus Peripateticus Thubursicensis’, Studi Noniani 3, 123–89.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2001), Fabulae praetextae: Spuren einer literarischen Gattung der Römer. Munich.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2011), Roman Republican Theatre. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2012), Tragicorum romanorum fragmenta: Vol. II Ennius. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Maras, D. F. (2009a), ‘Caratteri dell’epigrafia latina arcaica del Lazio meridionale’, in Drago Troccoli, (2009), 431–9.Google Scholar
Maras, D. F. (2009b), ‘Interferenze culturali arcaiche etrusco-latine: la scrittura’, Annali della Fondazione per il Museo Claudio Faina 16, 309–31.Google Scholar
Maras, D. F. (2009c), ‘Novità sulla diffusione dell’alfabeto latino nel Lazio arcaico’, in Mannino, , Mannino, and Maras, (2009), 105–18.Google Scholar
Maras, D. F. (2015), ‘Etruscan and Italic Literacy and the Case of Rome’, in Bloomer, (2015), 201–25.Google Scholar
Maras, D. F. (2020), ‘Traces of Orality in Writing’, in Whitehouse, (2020), 125–34.Google Scholar
Marchesini, S. (2004), ‘Seriazione ed epigrafia. L’impiego di BASP (The Bonn Archaeological Software Package) nello studio di iscrizioni’, Archeologia e Calcolatori 15, 257–66.Google Scholar
Marchesini, S. (2012), ‘The Elymian Language’, in Tribulato, (2012), 95–114.Google Scholar
Marinetti, A. (1985), Le iscrizioni sudpicene. Florence.Google Scholar
Mariotti, I. (1954), ‘I grecismi di Lucilio’, StudUrb 28, 357–86.Google Scholar
Mariotti, I. (1960a), Studi Luciliani. Florence.Google Scholar
Mariotti, I. (1960b), Introduzione a Pacuvio. Urbino.Google Scholar
Mariotti, I. (1967), Marii Victorini Ars Grammatica: introduzione, testo critico e commento. Florence.Google Scholar
Mariotti, S. (1952), Livio Andronico e la traduzione artistica: Saggio critico ed edizione dei frammenti dell’Odyssea. Milan.Google Scholar
Mariotti, S. (1955), Il Bellum Poenicum e l’arte di Nevio: Saggio con edizione dei frammenti del Bellum Poenicum. Rome.Google Scholar
Mariotti, S. (1988), ‘Ennius, Ann. 120 Skutsch (126 V.2)’, in Horsfall, (1988), 82–5.Google Scholar
Marotta, G. and Tamponi, L. (2019), ‘Omission of Final -S in Latin Inscriptions: Time and Space’, TPhS 117, 79–95.Google Scholar
Marouzeau, J. (1946), Traité de stylistique latine, 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. (2006), The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marti, H. (1974), ‘Zeugnisse zur Nachwirkung des Dichters Terenz im Altertum’, in Reinhardt, and Sallmann, (1974), 158–78.Google Scholar
Martín Rodríguez, A. M. (1996), ‘Dare, auxiliaire lexical en latin’, in Fruyt, and Moussy, (1996), 49–64.Google Scholar
Martzloff, V. (2018), ‘Métrique italique archaïque. Poésie sud-picénienne et inscription latine de Duenos’, in Hackstein, and Gunkel, (2018), 222–52.Google Scholar
Marx, F. (1904–1905), C. Lucilii carminum reliquiae. 2 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Massa-Pairault, F. H. (1992), ‘Aspetti e problemi della società prenestina tra iv e iii sec. a.C.’, in La necropoli di Praeneste: periodi orientalizzante e medio repubblicano: Atti del Secondo Convegno di Studi Archeologici, Palestrina 21/22 aprile 1990 (Palestrina), 109–45.Google Scholar
Maurenbrecher, B. (1893), C. Sallusti Crispi historiarum reliquiae 2. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Maurenbrecher, B. (1899), Hiatus und Verschleifung im alten Latein. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Mayans y Siscar, G. (1754), Ad triginta Jurisconsultorum fragmenta, quae extant in juris civilis corpore, commentarii. Geneva.Google Scholar
Mayhoff, K. (1892–1909), C. Plini Secundi Naturalis historiae libri xxxvii , 6 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Mazzanti, A., Jr (2018), Com ou sem ut? Um estudo da complementação com subjuntivo de facio e uolo em latim arcaico. Diss. São Paulo.Google Scholar
Mazzarino, A. (1955), Grammaticae Romanae fragmenta aetatis Caesareae, 2nd ed. Turin.Google Scholar
Mazzarino, A. (1962), Introduzione al De agri cultura di Catone, 2nd ed. Messina.Google Scholar
Mazzarino, A. (1982), M. Porci Catonis De agri cultura ad fidem Florentini codicis deperditi, 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1982), ‘Prosodic Structure and Expletive Infixation’, Language 58, 574–90.Google Scholar
McDonnell, M. (1987), ‘The Speech of Numidicus at Gellius, N.A. 1.6’, AJPh 108, 81–94.Google Scholar
McGlynn, P. (1963–1967), Lexicon Terentianum, 2 vols. London and Glasgow.Google Scholar
McNelis, C. and Sens, A. (2016), The Alexandra of Lycophron: A Literary Study. Oxford.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1933), Esquisse d’une histoire de la langue latine, 3rd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Meiser, G. (1986) Lautgeschichte der umbrischen Sprache. Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Meiser, G. (1998), Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Meiser, G. (2003), Veni Vidi Vici: Die Vorgeschichte des lateinischen Perfektsystems. Munich.Google Scholar
Meiser, G. (2014), Etruskische Texte: Editio Minor, 2 vols. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Meister, K. (1916), Lateinisch-griechische Eigennamen, i : Altitalische und römische Eigennamen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Mendózar, J. (2015), ‘Causatividad y construcciones con verbo soporte en latín: el ejemplo de poena afficere’, CFC(L) 35, 7–28.Google Scholar
Mercado, A. (2012), Italic Verse: A Study of the Poetic Remains of Old Latin, Faliscan, and Sabellian. Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Mercado, A. (2018), ‘Accent in Lucilius’ Hexameters’, in Breed, , Wallace, and Keitel, (2018), 184–214.Google Scholar
Merlin, A. (1903), ‘Inscriptions inédites de Khamissa (Thubursicum Numidarum)’, MEFRA 23, 117–30.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. (1842), Oratorum Romanorum Fragmenta. Zurich.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, W. (1935), Romanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, 3rd ed. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Molinari-Carlès, D. (2008), ‘Les adverbes latins en -(t)im’, in Fruyt, and Van Laer, (2008), 223–39.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. (1942), ‘Terra marique’, JRS 32, 53–64.Google Scholar
Monda, S. (2013), ‘La preistoria dell’Atellana nelle fonti storiche e letterarie’, in Raffaelli, and Tontini, (2013), 95–124.Google Scholar
Monda, S. (2015), ‘La cosiddetta Atellana imperiale’, Rationes Rerum 6, 121–47.Google Scholar
Monda, S. (2020), ‘La fabula Atellana’, in Petrone, G. (ed.) (2020), Storia del teatro latino, Rome, 255–67.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. (1998), ‘Music and Structure in Roman Comedy’, AJPh 119, 245–73.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. (1999), ‘Facing the Music: Character and Musical Accompaniment in Roman Comedy’, SyllClass 10, 130–53.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. (2008), ‘When did the Tibicen Play? Meter and Musical Accompaniment in Roman Comedy’, TAPhA 138, 3–46.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. (2012), Music in Roman Comedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. (2013), ‘Metre and Music’, in Augoustakis, and Traill, (2013), 89–110.Google Scholar
Morandi, A. (2009) ‘Su due iscrizioni protoitaliche dal tempo delle Stimmate a Velletri’, in Ghini, (2009), 325–30.Google Scholar
Morelli, G. (2011–2012), Caesii Bassi de metris, Atilii Fortunati de metris Horatianis, 2 vols. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. (2010), Musa Pedestris: Metre and Meaning in Roman Verse. Oxford.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. and Brown, P. G. M. (2017), ‘Latin Poetic Meter’, Oxford Bibliographies Online, DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780195389661-0257, accessed on 22 July 2022.Google Scholar
Morris, E. P. (1890), ‘On the Sentence-Question in Plautus and Terence’, AJPh 11, 16–54.Google Scholar
Moussy, C. (2005a), ‘La polysémie du préverbe com-’, in Moussy, (2005b), 243–62.Google Scholar
Moussy, C. (ed.) (2005b), La composition et la préverbation en latin. Paris.Google Scholar
Mueller, C. O. (1839), Sexti Pompei Festi De uerborum significatione quae supersunt cum Pauli Epitome. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Munro, H. A. J. (1886), T. Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex, 4th ed., 3 vols. London.Google Scholar
Munro, L. (2013), Archaic Style in English Literature, 1590–1674. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Müller, H. J. (1909), T. Livi ab urbe condita libri: Wilhelm Weissenborn’s erklärende Ausgabe, 9.1, 3rd ed. Berlin.Google Scholar
Müller, R. (2005), ‘Antike Periodisierungsmodelle des Lateinischen’, in Kiss, , Mondin, and Salvi, (2005), 15–23.Google Scholar
Müller, R. (2007), ‘Pura oratiound puri sermonis amator: Zu zwei Begriffsklippen der Terenz-Forschung’, in Kruschwitz, , Ehlers, and Felgentreu, (2007), 111–25.Google Scholar
Muñoz, M. T. and Carrasco, L. (eds.) (2015), Miscellanea Latina. Madrid.Google Scholar
Münzer, F. (1897), Beiträge zur Quellenkritik der Naturgeschichte des Plinius. Berlin.Google Scholar
Nassichuk, J. (2014), ‘Strepsiades’ Latin Voice: Two Renaissance Translations of Aristophanes’ Clouds’, in Olson, (2014), 427–46.Google Scholar
Nethercut, J. (2014). ‘Ennius and the Revaluation of Traditional Historiography in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura’, in Ker, and Pieper, (2014), 435–61.Google Scholar
Nethercut, J. S. (2018), ‘The Alexandrian Footnote in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura’, Mnemosyne, 75–99.Google Scholar
Nethercut, J. S. (2020), ‘How Ennian Was Latin Epic between the Annals and Lucretius?’, in Farrell, and Damon, (2020), 188–210.Google Scholar
Nethercut, J. S. (2021), Ennius Noster: Lucretius and the Annales. Oxford.Google Scholar
Neue, F. and Wagener, C. (1892–1905), Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache, 3rd ed., 4 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O. (1975), A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy, 2 vols. New York.Google Scholar
Nixon, P. (1938), Plautus 5: Stichus, Trinummus, Truculentus, Vidularia, Fragments. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Nolfo, F. (2008), ‘La commedia romana’, BStudLat 38, 737–41.Google Scholar
Nonnis, D. (2012), ‘Roma tra IV e III secolo a.C.: considerazioni sulla produzione epigrafica’, in Friggeri, , Granino Cecere, and Gregori, (2012), 136–8.Google Scholar
Norden, E. (1939), Aus altrömischen Priesterbüchern. Lund and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Norden, E. (1957), P. Vergilius Maro Aeneis Buch VI, 4th ed. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Norden, E. (1986), La prosa d’arte antica: Dal vi secolo a. C. all’età della rinascenza, transl. B. Heinemann. 2 vols. Rome.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, A. J. (1994), ‘Five Latin Verbs from a Root *leik-’, HSPh 96, 161–90.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, A. J. (1999), ‘Some Old Stories and a “New” Adjective in Latin’, Handout for paper presented at the 18th East Coast Indo-European Conference (University of Texas, Austin).Google Scholar
O’Donnell, J. J. (1980), ‘Augustine’s Classical Readings’, Recherches Augustiniennes et Patristiques 15, 144–75.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, N. (2012), ‘Notes and Discussions: Lucilius 93–94 Marx: Chaere, Tite’, CPh 107, 355–8.Google Scholar
Oakley, S. P. (1997–2005), A Commentary on Livy Books vi–x, 4 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Odelman, E. (1972), Études sur quelques reflets du style administratif chez César. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Ofitsch, M. and Zinko, C. (eds.) (1995), Studia Onomastica et Indogermanica: Festschrift für Fritz Lochner von Hüttenbach zum 65. Geburtstag. Graz.Google Scholar
Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A. (eds.) (1923), The Meaning of Meaning. London.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R. M. (1965), A Commentary on Livy Books 1–5. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R. M. (1974), Titi Liui ab urbe condita, tomus i, libri i–v. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R. M. (1978), The Library of Lactantius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Oksala, P. (1953), Die griechischen Lehnwörter in den Prosaschriften Ciceros. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Olson, S. D. (ed.) (2014), Ancient Comedy and Reception: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Henderson. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Oniga, R. (1985), ‘Il canticum di Sosia: forme stilistiche e modelli culturali’, MD 14, 113–208.Google Scholar
Oniga, R. (1988), I composti nominali latini: una morfologia generativa. Bologna.Google Scholar
Oniga, R. (1992), ‘Compounding in Latin’, Rivista di Linguistica 4, 97–116.Google Scholar
Oniga, R. (ed.) (2003), Il plurilinguismo nella tradizione letteraria latina. Rome.Google Scholar
Oniga, R. (2005), ‘Composition et préverbation en latin: problèmes de typologie’, in Moussy, (2005b), 211–28.Google Scholar
Oniga, R. and Re, A. (2017), ‘L’analyse synchronique des composés nominaux du latin, hier et aujourd’hui’, AC 86, 39–58.Google Scholar
Önnerfors, A. (1956), Pliniana: In Plinii maioris Naturalem historiam studia grammatica, semantica, critica. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Opfermann, A. (2016), Univerbierung: Der passive Wortbildungsmechanismus. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Orlandini, A. (1996), ‘Phénomènes de polarisation dans certaines complétives en latin’, in Rosén, (1996), 451–62.Google Scholar
Otten, W. and Pollmann, K. (eds.) (2007), Poetry and Exegesis in Premodern Latin Christianity: The Encounter Between Classical and Christian Strategies of Interpretation. Leiden.Google Scholar
Packard, D. W. (1968), A Concordance to Livy, 4 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Pais, E. (1915–1921), Ricerche sulla storia e sul diritto pubblico di Roma, 4 vols. Rome.Google Scholar
Palmer, L. R. (1954), The Latin Language. London.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, C. (2010), Decimus Laberius: The Fragments. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, C. (2019), ‘Native Italian Drama and Its Influence on Plautus’, in Dinter, (2019), 32–46.Google Scholar
Panciera, S. (1989–1990), ‘Le iscrizioni votive latine’, Scienze dell’Antichità 3–4, 905–15 (= Panciera 2006: 1.21–30).Google Scholar
Panciera, S. (1994), ‘La lex luci Spoletina e la legislazione sui boschi sacri in età romana’, in Monteluco e i monti sacri. Atti dell’incontro di studio, Spoleto 1993 (Spoleto), 903–19.Google Scholar
Panciera, S. (1995), ‘La posizione epigrafica di Roma in età repubblicana’, in Solin, , Salomies and Liertz (eds.), 319–42.Google Scholar
Panciera, S. (2006), Epigrafi, epigrafia, epigrafisti: Scritti vari e inediti (1956–2005) con note complementari e inedite. Rome.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, S. (ed.) (2014), Terence and Interpretation. Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Pascucci, G. (1968), ‘Aspetti del latino giuridico’, SIFC 40, 3–43.Google Scholar
Pascucci, G. (1983), ‘Valerio Probo e i ueteres’, in Scritti scelti (Florence), 397–422 (= Grammatici latini di età imperiale (Genoa 1976), 17–40).Google Scholar
Pasetti, L. (2007), Plauto in Apuleio. Bologna.Google Scholar
Pease, A. S. (1963), M. Tulli Ciceronis De divinatione libri duo. Darmstadt (1st ed. Urbana-Champaign 1920–3).Google Scholar
Pennacini, A. (1974), La funzione dell’arcaismo e del neologismo nelle teorie della prosa da Cornificio a Frontone. Turin.Google Scholar
Penney, J. (1999), ‘Archaism and Innovation in Latin Poetic Syntax’, in Adams, and Mayer, (1999), 249–68.Google Scholar
Penney, J. (2011), ‘Archaic and Old Latin’, in Clackson, (2011a), 220–35.Google Scholar
Pensabene, P. et al. (2000), ‘Ceramica graffita di età arcaica e repubblicana dall’area sud ovest del Palatino’, Scienze dell’antichità storia, archeologia, antropologia 10, 163–247.Google Scholar
Pepe, L. (1975), ‘L’annalista Q. Fabio Massimo Serviliano’, StudUrb 49, 95–108.Google Scholar
Peruzzi, E. (1963), ‘L’iscrizione di Vendia’, Maia 15, 89–92.Google Scholar
Peter, H. (1906–1914), Historicorum Romanorum Reliquiae, 2 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Petersmann, H. (1999), ‘The Language of Early Roman Satire: Its Function and Characteristics’, in Adams, and Mayer, (1999), 289–310.Google Scholar
Petersmann, H. and Petersmann, A. (2003), ‘Sprache und Stil als ein Mittel der Personencharakterisierung in den Komödien des Plautus’, in Schauer, and Thome, (2003), 108–15.Google Scholar
Pezzini, G. (2015), Terence and the Verb ‘To Be‘ in Latin. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pezzini, G. (2016), ‘Comic Lexicon: Searching for Underground Latin from Plautus to Erasmus’, in Adams, and Vincent, (2016), 14–46.Google Scholar
Pezzini, G. (2018), ‘The Early Lucilius and the Language of the Roman Palliata’, in Breed, , Keitel, and Wallace, (2018), 162–83.Google Scholar
Pezzini, G. and Taylor, B. (eds.) (2019), Language and Nature in the Classical Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pinkster, H. (1969), ‘A B & C Coordination in Latin’, Mnemosyne 22, 458–67.Google Scholar
Pinkster, H. (1972), On Latin Adverbs. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Pinkster, H. (2005), ‘The Language of Pliny the Elder’, in Reinhardt, , Lapidge, and Adams, (2005), 239–56.Google Scholar
Pinkster, H. (2015), The Oxford Latin Syntax, Volume 1: The Simple Clause. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pinkster, H. (2021), The Oxford Latin Syntax, Volume 2: The Complex Sentence. Oxford.Google Scholar
Piras, G. (ed.) (2014), Labor in studiis: scritti di filologia in onore di Piergiorgio Parroni. Rome.Google Scholar
Ploen, H. (1882), De copiae uerborum differentiis inter uaria poesis Romanae antiquioris genera intercedentibus. Diss. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Poccetti, P. (1980–1981), ‘Varietà linguistica nell’Italia antica e tradizione latina: per l’interpretazione di Lucilio 581 M.’, AION 2–3: 113–24.Google Scholar
Poccetti, P. (1999), ‘Identità e identificazione del latino’, in Poccetti, P., Poli, D. and Santini, C., 9–171.Google Scholar
Poccetti, P. (2003), ‘Il plurilinguismo di Lucilio e le selve dell’interpretazione: Gli elementi italici nei frammenti 581 e 1318 M.’, in Oniga (2003), 63–89.Google Scholar
Poccetti, P. (2018), ‘Another Image of Literary Latin: Language Variation and the Aims of Lucilius’ Satires’, in Breed, , Keitel, and Wallace, (2018), 81–131.Google Scholar
Poccetti, P., Poli, D. and Santini, C. (1999), Una storia della lingua latina: formazione, usi, comunicazione. Rome.Google Scholar
Pompei, A. (2011), ‘Relative Clauses’, in Baldi, and Cuzzolin, (2009–2014), 4. 427–547.Google Scholar
Possanza, D. M. (2004), Translating the Heavens: Aratus, Germanicus, and the Poetics of Latin Translation. New York.Google Scholar
Poulsen, B. (2002), ‘Genucilia – Small Plate with a Large Range’, in Rathje, , Nielsen, and Rasmussen, (2002), 83–100.Google Scholar
Poultney, J. W. (1953), ‘The Declension of Latin Compound Adjectives’, AJPh, 367–82.Google Scholar
Poultney, J. W. (1959), The Bronze Tables of Iguvium. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (1988), Cato Maior de Senectute. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (2005), ‘Cicero’s Adaptation of Legal Latin in the De Legibus’, in Reinhardt, , Lapidge, and Adams, (2005), 117–50.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (2011), ‘Legal Latin’, in Clackson, (2011), 464–84.Google Scholar
Prag, J. R. W. (2014), ‘Bronze Rostra from the Egadi Islands off NW Sicily: the Latin Inscriptions’, JRA 27, 33–59.Google Scholar
Prag, J. R. W. (2017a), ‘Le iscrizioni latine sui rostra delle Egadi’, in Tusa, and Buccellato, (2017), 153–64.Google Scholar
Prag, J. R. W. (2017b), ‘A Revised Edition of the Latin Inscription on the Egadi 11: Bronze Rostrum from the Egadi Islands’, ZPE 202, 287–92.Google Scholar
Preuss, S. (1881), De bimembris dissoluti apud scriptores Romanos usu sollemni. Edenkoben.Google Scholar
Prinzen, H. (1998), Ennius im Urteil der Antike. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Puccioni, G. (1944), ‘L’uso stilistico dei compositi nominali latini’, Atti Accademici d’Italia 4, 371–481.Google Scholar
Pullig, H. (1888), Ennio quid debuerit Lucretius. Diss. Halle.Google Scholar
Quattordio Moreschini, A. (ed.) (1985), L’etrusco e le lingue dell’Italia antica: Atti del Convegno della Società Italiana di Glottologia, Pisa 8 e 9 dicembre 1984. Pisa.Google Scholar
Questa, C. (1984), Numeri innumeri: ricerche sui cantica e la tradizione manoscritta di Plauto. Rome.Google Scholar
Questa, C. (1995), Titi Macci Plauti cantica. Urbino.Google Scholar
Questa, C. (2007), La metrica di Plauto e di Terenzio. Urbino.Google Scholar
Radke, G. (1991), ‘Beobachtungen zum Elogium auf L. Cornelius Scipio Barbatus’, RM 134, 69–79.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, R. (1982), Ricerche sui versi lunghi di Plauto e Terenzio. Pisa.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, R. (1987), ‘Pomponio e l’Atellana (spunti di analisi stilistiche e tematiche)’, in Cispadana e letteratura antica: Atti del convegno di studi tenuto ad Imola nel maggio 1986. Bologna, 115–33.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) (2009), Lecturae Plautinae Sarsinates xii : Miles gloriosus. Urbino.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) (2010), L’Atellana letteraria: Atti della prima giornata di studi sull’Atellana. Urbino.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, R. and Tontini, A. (eds.) (2013), L’Atellana preletteraria: Atti della seconda giornata di studi sull’Atellana. Urbino.Google Scholar
Rathje, A., Nielsen, M., and Rasmussen, B. B. (eds.) (2002), Pots for the Living, Pots for the Dead. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Reggio, G. (2005), ‘Relative Clauses in Juridical Latin’, in Calboli, (2005), 653–61.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2010), ‘Syntactic Colloquialism in Lucretius’, in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010), 203–28.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T., Lapidge, M. and Adams, J. N. (eds.) (2005), Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose. Oxford.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, U. and Sallmann, K. (eds.) (1974), Musa Iocosa: Arbeiten über Humor und Witz, Komik und Komödie der Antike. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Renehan, R. (1977), ‘Compound-Simplex Verbal Iteration in Plautus’, CPh 72, 243–8.Google Scholar
Renehan, R. (1998), ‘On Gender Shifting as a Literary Device in Latin Poetry’, in Knox, and Foss, (1998), 212–29.Google Scholar
Rett, J. (2011), ‘Exclamatives, Degrees and Speech Acts’, Linguistics and Philosophy 34, 411–42.Google Scholar
Reuther, P. (1903), De Catonis De agri cultura libri vestigiis apud Graecos. Diss. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Ribbeck, O. (1858), ‘Über F. Ritschl’s Forschungen zur lateinischen Sprachgeschichte’, Neue Jahrbücher für Philologie und Paedagogik 77, 177–213.Google Scholar
Ribbeck, O. (1869), Beiträge zur Lehre von den lateinischen Partikeln. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Ribbeck, O. (1896–1897), Scaenicae Romanorum poesis fragmenta, 3rd ed., 2 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (2017), Slave Theater in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Richter, W. (1978), Gegenständliches Denken, archaisches Ordnen: Untersuchungen zur Anlage von Cato De agri cultura. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Risch, E. (1984), Gerundivum und Gerundium: Gebrauch im klassischen und älteren Latein, Entstehung und Vorgeschichte. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Risicato, A. (1966), Lingua parlata e lingua d’arte in Ennio, 2nd ed. Messina.Google Scholar
Risselada, R. (1993), Imperatives and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Risselada, R. (2005), ‘Particles in Questions’, in Calboli, (2005), 663–79.Google Scholar
Risselada, R., Jong, J. R., and Bolkestein, A. M. (eds.) (1996), On Latin: Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Harm Pinkster. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ritschl, F. (1878), Opuscula Philologica, 4. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Rix, H. (1985), ‘Descrizioni di rituali in etrusco e in italico’, in Quattordio Moreschini, (1985), 21–37.Google Scholar
Rix, H. (1998), ‘Eine neue frühsabellische Inschrift und der altitalische Präventiv’, HSF 11, 247–69.Google Scholar
Rix, H. (2002), Sabellische Texte: die Texte des Oskischen, Umbrischen und Südpikenischen. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Rocchi, S. (2007), ‘I ueteres di Valerio Probo’, in Bonadeo, and Romano, (2007), 78–86.Google Scholar
Rocchi, S. and Mussini, C. (eds.) (2017), Imagines antiquitatis: Representations, Concepts, Receptions of the Past in Roman Antiquity and the Early Italian Renaissance. Berlin.Google Scholar
Romanini, F. (2007), Malli Theodori De metris: Introduzione, edizione critica e traduzione. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Romano, E. (2003), ‘Il concetto di antico in Varrone’, in Citroni, (2003), 99–117.Google Scholar
Rosellini, M. and Spangenberg Yanes, E. (2019), ‘L’insegnamento di Prisciano’, in Garcea, , Rosellini, and Silvano, (2019), 163–81.Google Scholar
Rosén, H. (1981), Studies in the Syntax of the Verbal Noun in Early Latin. Munich.Google Scholar
Rosén, H. (1999a), Latine Loqui: Trends and Directions in the Crystallization of Classical Latin. Munich.Google Scholar
Rosén, H. (1999b), ‘Phonetica Latina varia’, in Anreiter, and Jerem, (1999), 397–408.Google Scholar
Rosén, H. (ed.) (1996), Aspects of Latin: Papers from the Seventh International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Jerusalem, April 1993. Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, C. (2018), ‘I Said, He Said: Fragments of Informal Conversations’, in Gray, et al. (2018), 247–59.Google Scholar
Ruge, M. (1881), Bemerkungen zu den griechischen Lehnwörtern im Lateinischen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Ruiz Darasse, C. and Luján, E. R. (eds.) (2011), Contacts linguistiques dans l’Occident méditerranéen antique. Madrid.Google Scholar
Rychlewska, L. (1967–1968), ‘De Nonii comoediarum Naeuianarum notitia’, Eos 57, 203–10.Google Scholar
Saalfeld, G. A. E. A. (1884), Tensaurus italograecus. Ausführliches historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch der griechischen Lehn- und Fremdwörter im Lateinischen. Vienna.Google Scholar
Santoro, P. (ed.) (2008), Una nuova iscrizione da Magliano Sabina: scrittura e cultura nella valle del Tevere. Pisa and Rome.Google Scholar
Sblendorio Cugusi, M. T. (1971), ‘Note sullo stile dell’oratoria catoniana’, AFLC 34, 5–32.Google Scholar
Sblendorio Cugusi, M. T. (1982), M. Porci Catonis orationum reliquiae. Turin.Google Scholar
Sblendorio Cugusi, M. T. (1991), I sostantivi latini in -tudo. Bologna.Google Scholar
Sblendorio Cugusi, M. T. (1996), ‘Per la storia di nothus e di nugator (e un frammento catoniano conservato ad verbum)’, Eikasmos 7, 219–41.Google Scholar
Sblendorio Cugusi, M. T. and Cugusi, P. (1996), ‘Problematica catoniana: Rassegna di studi 1978–1993 e contributi critici’, BStudLat 26, 82–218.Google Scholar
Scaliger, J. J. (1565), Coniectanea in M. Terentium Varronem de lingua Latina. Paris.Google Scholar
Scaliger, J. J. (1575), M. Verrii Flacci quae extant. Sex. Pompei Festi de verborum significatione libri xx. Et in eos Iosephi Scaligeri Iul. Caesaris filii Castigationes nunc primum publicatae. Geneva.Google Scholar
Scaliger, J. J. (1576), In Sex. Pompei Festi libros de verborum significatione Castigationes recognitae et auctae. His accesserunt Annotationes ex Veneta editione. Paris.Google Scholar
Scaliger, J. J. (1591), Sophoclis Aiax Lorarius, stylo tragico a Iosepho Scaligero Iulii f. translatus. Eiusdem epigrammata quaedam, tum Graeca tum Latina, cum aliquot ex Graeco translatis. Printed as an appendix to I. Caesaris Scaligeri viri clarissimi poemata in duas partes divisa. Geneva. (1st edition 1574.)Google Scholar
Scaliger, J. J. (1670), Prima Scaligerana, nusquam antehac edita, cum praefatione T. Fabri. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Scaliger, J. J. and Canter, W. (1566) Lycophronis Chalcidensis Alexandrae, siue Cassandrae uersiones duae; una ad uerbum a Guglielmo Cantero: altera carmine espressa, per Iosephum Scaligerum, Iulii f. Basel.Google Scholar
Schauer, M. (2012), Tragicorum Romanorum Fragmenta: Vol. I Livius Andronicus, Naevius, tragici minores, fragmenta adespota. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Schauer, M. and Thome, G. (eds.) (2003), Altera Ratio: Klassische Philologie zwischen Subjektivität und Wissenschaft. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1968), ‘Sequencing in Conversational Openings’, American Anthropologist 70, 1075–95.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. and Sacks, H. (1973), ‘Opening up Closings’, Semiotica 8, 289–327.Google Scholar
Schierl, P. (2006), Die Tragödien des Pacuvius: Ein Kommentar zu den Fragmenten mit Einleitung, Text und Übersetzung. Berlin.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1952), ‘Terenz als Menander Latinus’, RhM 95, 229–72.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. A. (ed.) (2001), L’histoire littéraire immanente dans la poésie latine. Geneva.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. G. (1975), ‘Philosophische und poetische Elemente bei Lukrez’, in Urushadze, and Gordeziani, (1975), 175–99.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. G. (1981), ‘Himmel-Erde-Meer im frühgriechischen Epos und im alten Orient’, Philologus 125, 1–24.Google Scholar
Schuhmann, R. (2009), ‘Loanwords in Old High German’, in Haspelmath, and Tadmor, (2009), 330–7.Google Scholar
Sciarrino, E. (2011), Cato the Censor and the Beginnings of Latin Prose: from Poetic Translation to Elite Transcription. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Scourfield, J. H. D. (2007), Texts and Culture in Late Antiquity: Inheritance, Authority, and Change. Swansea.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1976), ‘A Classification of Illocutionary Acts’, Language in Society 5, 1–24.Google Scholar
Sebeok, T. A. (ed.) (1960), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Segal, E. (ed.) (2001), Oxford Readings in Menander, Plautus, and Terence. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sen, R. (2015), Syllable and Segment in Latin. Oxford.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1983), ‘Cicero and Early Latin Poetry’, ICS 8, 239–49.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1987), M. Tulli Ciceronis Epistulae ad Atticum, 2 vols. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Shanzer, D. (2012), ‘Augustine and the Latin Classics’, in Vessey, (2012), 161–74.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. (2013), ‘Terence and Non-comic Intertexts’, in Augoustakis, and Traill, (2013), 52–68.Google Scholar
Shipp, G. P. (1960), P. Terenti Afri Andria, 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
Siebenborn, E. (1976), Die Lehre von der Sprachrichtigkeit und ihren Kriterien: Studien zur antiken normativen Grammatik. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Siegert, H. K. (1939), Die Syntax der Tempora und Modi der ältesten lateinischen Inschriften (bis zum Tode Caesars). Würzburg.Google Scholar
Sier, K. and Wockener-Gade, K. (eds.) (2010), Gottfried Hermann (1772–1848): Internationales Symposium in Leipzig 11.–13. Oktober 2007. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Sigonio, C. (1555–1572), T. Livi Patavini Historiarum Ab Urbe Condita Libri. Venice.Google Scholar
Sjögren, H. (1906), Zum Gebrauch des Futurums im Altlateinischen. Uppsala and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. (1948), ‘Enniana II’, CQ 42, 94–101 (= Skutsch 1968: 30–45).Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. (1968), Studia Enniana. London.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. (ed.) (1972), Ennius: Sept exposés suivis de discussions. Geneva.Google Scholar
Skutsch, O. (1985), The Annals of Q. Ennius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Solin, H. (1971), Beiträge zur Kenntnis der griechischen Personennamen in Rom. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Solin, H. (1999), ‘Epigrafia repubblicana: Bilancio, novità, prospettive’, in Atti dell’ xi Congresso internazionale di epigrafia greca e latina. Roma, 18–24 settembre 1997, 397–404.Google Scholar
Solin, H. (2003), Die griechischen Personennamen in Rom: Ein Namenbuch. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Solin, H., Salomies, O., and Liertz, U.-M. (eds.), Acta Colloquii Epigraphici Latini Helsingiae 3–6 Sept. 1991 Habiti. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Solodow, J. B. (1978), The Latin Particle quidem. University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Sommer, F. (1914), Handbuch der lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre, 2nd and 3rd ed. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Sommer, F. and Pfister, R. (1977), Handbuch der lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre, Band 1, Einleitung und Lautlehre, 4th ed. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Soubiran, J. (1988), Essai sur la versification dramatique des Romains. Paris.Google Scholar
Spahlinger, L. (2005), Tulliana simplicitas: Zu Form und Funktion des Zitats in den philosophischen Dialogen Ciceros. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Spevak, O. (2015), ‘Les noms verbaux en latin’, BSL 110, 289–321.Google Scholar
Spevak, O. (2018a), ‘Les constructions à verbe support dans les textes normatifs’, in Bodelot, and Spevak, (2018), 207–18.Google Scholar
Spevak, O. (2018b), ‘La construction à participe dominant vs. le nom verbal chez Cicéron’, Revue de Philologie 92, 63–84.Google Scholar
Spevak, O. (2019), ‘La construction à participe dominant (ab urbe condita): emplois prépositionnels’, Folia Philologica 142, 283–306.Google Scholar
Squintu, C. (1999), ‘Pomponio novator verborum’, AFLC 54, 171–203.Google Scholar
Squintu, C. (2000), ‘Le formazioni diminutive nelle Atellane’, AFLC 55, 154–68.Google Scholar
Squintu, C. (2003), ‘Note sulla lingua di Pomponio’, AFLC 57, 69–87.Google Scholar
Squintu, C. (2006), Le Atellane di Pomponio. Introduzione, commento e indici. Cagliari.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W. (ed.) (2013), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W. (2002), ‘Cicero’s Brutus: The End of Oratory and the Beginning of History?’, BICS 46, 195–211.Google Scholar
Stephens, L. (1985), ‘Indirect Questions in Old Latin: Syntactic and Pragmatic Factors Conditioning Modal Shift’, ICS 10, 195–214.Google Scholar
Stibbe, C. M. et al. (eds.) (1980), Lapis Satricanus: Archaeological, Epigraphical, Linguistic and Historical Aspects of the New Inscription from Satricum. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Stok, F. (ed.) (2013), Totus scientia plenus: Percorsi dell’esegesi virgiliana antica. Pisa.Google Scholar
Stone, D. L. (1998), ‘Culture and Investment in the Rural Landscape: The North African bonus agricola’, AntAfr 34, 103–13.Google Scholar
Strecker, K. (1925), Die Lieder Walters von Chatillon in der Handschrift 351 von St. Omer. Berlin.Google Scholar
Stroh, W. (1990), ‘Arsis und Thesis oder: Wie hat man lateinische Verse gesprochen?’, in von Albrecht and Schubert (1990), 87–116.Google Scholar
Stroth, F. A. (1784), Titi Livi Operum Omnium Voll. Gotha.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, J. (2004), Phonetics and Philology: Sound Change in Italic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Stürner, F. (2011), Monologe bei Plautus: ein Beitrag zur Dramaturgie der hellenistisch-römischen Komödie. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Styka, J. (1990), ‘Estetyka tragedii republikańskiej w pismach Cycerona = M.T. Ciceronis de tragoedia Romana opiniones criticae’, Meander 45, 127–41.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. (1968), Untersuchungen zur Selbstdarstellung älterer römischer Dichter. Livius Andronicus, Naevius, Ennius. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Suerbaum, W. (ed.) (2002), Handbuch der lateinischen Literatur der Antike Bd. 1: Die archaische Literatur. Von den Anfängen bis Sullas Tod. Die vorliterarische Periode und die Zeit von 240 bis 78 v. Chr. Munich.Google Scholar
Swiggers, P. (ed.) (2019), Language, Grammar, and Erudition: From Antiquity to Modern Times. Leuven.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, O. (1975), ‘The Origins of Roman Drama and Greek Tragedy’, Hermes 103, 300–32.Google Scholar
Tadmor, U. (2009), ‘Loanwords in the World’s Languages: Findings and Results’, in Haspelmath, and Tadmor, (2009), 55–75.Google Scholar
Taifacos, I. (ed.) (2005), The Origins of European Scholarship: The Cyprus Millennium International Conference. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (2012), Virgil, Aeneid: Book xii. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. (2016), ‘Rationalism and the Theatre in Lucretius’, CQ 66, 140–54.Google Scholar
Ternes, C. M. and Longrée, D. (eds.) (1998), Études luxembourgeoises d’histoire et de littérature romaines 1, Oratio soluta – oratio numerosa: les mécanismes linguistiques de cohésion et de rupture dans la prose latine. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Terrinoni, A. (2012), ‘Sulla clausola di equiparazione siremps lex esto quasi’, in Ferrary, (2012), 157–76.Google Scholar
Thieling, W. (1910), Der Hellenismus in Kleinafrika: Der griechische Kultureinfluß in den römischen Provinzen Nordwestafrikas. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Thomas, F. (1935), ‘Sur les désidératifs latins en -essō’, RPh 9, 280–7.Google Scholar
Thomas, F. (1938), Recherches sur le subjonctif latin: histoire et valeur des formes. Diss. Paris.Google Scholar
Tierno, C. (2016), Las colocaciones verbo-nominales en la Mulomedicina Chironis y en Vegecio. Diss. Madrid.Google Scholar
Tihon, A., Leurquin, R. and Scheuren, C. (2001), Une version byzantine du Traité sur l’astrolabe du Pseudo-Messahalla. Louvain-La-Neuve.Google Scholar
Tiisala, Y. (1974), Die griechischen Lehnwörter bei den römischen Historikern bis zum Ende der Augusteischen Zeit. Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Tikannen, K. W. (2017), ‘On the Building of a Narrative; the uer sacrum Ritual’, Mnemosyne 70, 958–76.Google Scholar
Till, R. (1935), Die Sprache Catos. Leipzig (= Till 1968).Google Scholar
Till, R. (1968), La lingua di Catone, transl. C. De Meo. Rome.Google Scholar
Timpanaro, S. (1994), ‘Alcuni tipi di sinonimi in asindeto in latino arcaico e loro sopravvivenze in latino classico’, in Nuovi contributi di filologia e storia della lingua latina (Bologna), 1–74.Google Scholar
Timpanaro, S. (2001), Virgilianisti antichi e tradizione indiretta. Florence.Google Scholar
Timpanaro, S. (2002), Per la storia della filologia virgiliana antica, 2nd ed. Rome.Google Scholar
Tomlin, R. S. O. (1988), ‘Tabellae Sulis: Roman Inscribed Tablets of Tin and Lead From the Sacred Spring at Bath’, in Cunliffe, (1988), 59–277.Google Scholar
Tomlin, R. S. O. (1993), ‘The Inscribed Lead Tablets: An Interim Report’, in Woodward, and Leach, (1993), 113–30.Google Scholar
Touratier, C. (1994), Syntaxe latine. Leuven.Google Scholar
Tribulato, O. (ed.) (2012), Language and Linguistic Contact in Ancient Sicily. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tuck, A. and Wallace, R. (2012), ‘An Inscribed Rocchetto from Poggio Civitate (Murlo)’, SE 74, 197–202.Google Scholar
Tuck, A. and Wallace, R. (2018a), ‘An Umbrian Inscription at Poggio Civitate (Murlo)’, Glotta, Bd. 94, 273–82.Google Scholar
Tuck, A. and Wallace, R. (2018b), ‘A Third Inscribed Kyathos from Poggio Civitate’, MDAI(R) 124, 301–9.Google Scholar
Tuck, A. and Wallace, R. (2018c), The Archaeology of Language at Poggio Civitate (Murlo). Rome.Google Scholar
Tusa, S. and Buccellato, C. A. (eds.) (2017), La battaglia delle Egadi: Atti del convegno Favignana, ex Stabilimento Florio, 20–21 novembre 2015. Palermo.Google Scholar
Uhl, A. (1998), Servius als Sprachlehrer: Zur Sprachrichtigkeit in der exegetischen Praxis des spätantiken Grammatikerunterrichts. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Ullman, B. L. (1943), ‘By Castor and Pollux’, The Classical Weekly 37, 87–9.Google Scholar
Unceta Gómez, L., (2018), ‘Gli studi sulla (s)cortesia linguistica in latino. Possibilità di analisi e proposte per il futuro’, Studi e Saggi Linguistici 56, 9–37.Google Scholar
Untermann, J. (1972), ‘Entwürfe zu einer Enniusgrammatik’, in Skutsch, (1972), 209–45.Google Scholar
Untermann, J. (2000), Wörterbuch des Oskisch-Umbrischen. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Urbanová, D. (1999), ‘La paleografia delle iscrizioni latine arcaiche’, in Atti dell’ xi Congresso internazionale di epigrafia greca e latina. Roma, 18–24 settembre 1997 (Rome), 477–92.Google Scholar
Urushadze, A. V. and Gordeziani, R. V. (eds.) (1975), Problems in Ancient Culture. Tbilisi.Google Scholar
Vahlen, J. (1903), Ennianae poesis reliquiae, 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Van den Hout, M. P. J. (1988), M. Cornelii Frontonis Epistulae. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Van Heems, G. (2011), ‘À propos de l’échange graphique f- / h- en Étrusque’, in Ruiz Darasse, and Luján, (2011), 173–94.Google Scholar
Van Sickle, J. (1987), ‘The Elogia of the Cornelii Scipiones and the Origin of Epigram at Rome’, AJPh 108, 41–55.Google Scholar
Väänänen, V. (1981), Introduction au latin vulgaire, 3rd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. (1981), ‘Lo spettacolo della natura: Circo, teatro e potere in Plinio’, Aut Aut 184–5, 111–25.Google Scholar
Vessey, M. (ed.) (2012), A Companion to Augustine. Chichester.Google Scholar
Vincent, N. (2016), ‘Continuity and Change from Latin to Romance’, in Adams, and Vincent, (2016), 1–13.Google Scholar
Vine, B. (1993), Studies in Archaic Latin Inscriptions. Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Vine, B. (1998), ‘Remarks on the Archaic Latin Garigliano Bowl Inscription’, ZPE 121, 257–62.Google Scholar
Voeltz, F. K. E. and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.) (2001), Ideophones. Amsterdam and Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Vogt-Spira, G. (2001), ‘Traditions of Theatrical Improvisation in Plautus: Some Considerations’, in Segal, (2001), 95–106.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2002), The Poetics of Latin Didactic: Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Vollmer, F. (1891), ‘Laudationum funebrium Romanorum historia et reliquiarum editio’, Fleckeisens Jahrbücher für classische Philologie 18, 445–529.Google Scholar
Vollmer, F. (1917), Kürzung durch Tonanschluss im alten Latein. Munich.Google Scholar
Wachter, R. (1987), Altlateinische Inschriften: Sprachliche und epigraphische Untersuchungen zu den Dokumenten bis etwa 150 v. Chr. Bern.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, J. (1926–1928), Vorlesungen über Syntax, 2nd ed., 2 vols. Basel.Google Scholar
Wald, L. (1968), ‘Considérations sur la distribution des formes archaïques chez Lucrèce’, Helikon 8, 161–73.Google Scholar
Walde, A. and Hofmann, J. B. (1965), Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, 4th ed., 2 vols. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. (1982), ‘A Note on the Phonostylistics of Latin: (s) in Plautus’, Glotta 60, 120–4.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. (1987), ‘The Origins and Development of the Latin Alphabet’, in Senner, W. (ed.), The Origins of Writing. Lincoln, NE. 121–35.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. (2008), Zikh Rasna: A Manual of the Etruscan Language and Inscriptions. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. (2011), ‘The Latin Alphabet and Orthography’, in Clackson, (2011), 9–28.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. (2018), ‘A Preview of the Inscribed Stele of Vicchio’, in Gunkel, et al. (2018), 426–37.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. (forthcoming), ‘Alphabets, Writing and Literacy’, in De Angelis, F. and Maiuro, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Pre-Roman Italy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. and Joseph, B. D. (1991), ‘On the Problematic f/h Variation in Faliscan’, Glotta, 84–93.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2008), Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G. (1996), Livy book xl. Warminster.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G. (1999), Titi Liui ab urbe condita tomus vi: libri xxxvi–xl. Oxford.Google Scholar
Walters, C. F. and Conway, R. S. (1919), Titi Liui ab urbe condita tomus vi: libri vi–x. Oxford.Google Scholar
Warmington, E. H. (1935–1940), Remains of Old Latin, 4 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Waszink, J. H. (1966), ‘Letum’, Mnemosyne 19, 249–60.Google Scholar
Watkins, C. (1995a), ‘Greece in Italy Outside Rome’, HSPh 97, 35–50.Google Scholar
Watkins, C. (1995b), How to Kill a Dragon: Aspects of Indo-European Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Watkins, C. (2013), ‘Aspects of the “Expressive Dimension” in Indo-European: Toward a Comparative Grammar of Speech Registers’, in Jamison, , Welchert, and Vine, (2013), 243–53.Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. (1944), Die Schule des Aristoteles. Heft 1: Dikaiarchos. Basel.Google Scholar
Weise, O. (1882), Die griechischen Wörter im Latein. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Weiss, M. (2020), Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor, MI and New York.Google Scholar
Weissenborn, W. (1851). Titi Livi ab urbe condita libri, pars v. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Weissenborn, W. (1875), Titi Livi ab urbe condita libri, 9.1: Buch xxxix und xl. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wellmann, M. (1921), Die Georgika des Demokritos. Berlin.Google Scholar
Welsh, J. T. (2012), ‘The Methods of Nonius Marcellus’ Sources 26, 27, and 28’, CQ 62, 827–45.Google Scholar
Welsh, J. T. (2013), ‘Some Fragments of Republican Drama from Nonius Marcellus’ Sources 26, 27 and 28’, CQ 63, 253–76.Google Scholar
Welsh, J. T. (2018), ‘Nonius Marcellus p. 393.30’, Mnemosyne 71, 346–50.Google Scholar
Welsh, J. T. (2019), ‘Verse Quotations in Festus’, HSPh 108, 403–54.Google Scholar
Welsh, J. T. (2021), ‘Nonius Marcellus and the Source Called “Gloss. I”’, HSPh 111, 567–624.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1966), Hesiod: Theogony. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1988), ‘The Rise of the Greek Epic’, JHS 108, 151–72.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1992), Iambi et elegi Graeci, 2nd ed., 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2007), Indo-European Poetry and Myth. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, S. (1984), ‘Lycophron Italicised’, JHS 104, 127–51.Google Scholar
Westra, H. J. (2007), ‘Augustine and Poetic Exegesis’, in Otten, and Pollmann, (2007), 9–28.Google Scholar
White, D. C. (1980), ‘The Method of Composition and Sources of Nonius Marcellus’, Studi Noniani 8, 111–211.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, R. D. (ed.) (2020), Etruscan Literacy in its Social Context. London. (Accordia Specialist Studies on Italy 18).Google Scholar
Willi, A. (2017), ‘Krieg und Frieden im frühen Rom: Altes und Neues zum carmen Arvale’, in Willi, A. (ed.), Sprachgeschichte und Epigraphik: Festgaben für Rudolph Wachter zum 60. Geburtstag (Innsbruck), 147–233.Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. (2012), The Cosmic Viewpoint: A Study of Seneca’s Natural Questions. Oxford.Google Scholar
Willis, G. G. (1950), Saint Augustine and the Donatist Controversy. London.Google Scholar
Wills, J. (1996), Repetition in Latin Poetry: Figures of Allusion. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1985), Catullus and His World: A Reappraisal. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (2015), The Roman Audience: Classical Literature as Social History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wölfflin, E. (1933), ‘Zur Alliteration’, in Meyer, G. (ed.), Ausgewählte Schriften (Leipzig), 225–84.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2018) Tacitus, Annals Book 4. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. and Martin, R. H. (1996) Tacitus, Annals Book 3. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. and Leach, P. (eds.)(1993), The Uley Shrines: Excavations of a Ritual Complex on West Hill, Uley, Gloucestershire 1977–9. London.Google Scholar
Wreschniok, R. (1907), De Cicerone Lucretioque Ennii imitatoribus. Diss. Breslau.Google Scholar
Wright, F. W. (1931), Cicero and the Theater. Northampton, MA.Google Scholar
Wright, J. (1974), Dancing in Chains: The Stylistic Unity of the Comoedia Palliata. Rome.Google Scholar
Zaffagno, E. (2003), ‘Nonio e la sua lingua’, in Bertini, (2003), 7–79.Google Scholar
Zagagi, N. (2012), ‘What Do Greek Words Do in Plautus?’, in Glucker, and Burnett, (2012), 19–36.Google Scholar
Zago, G. (2015), ‘Per il testo del Ludus Septem Sapientum di Ausonio’, Aevum(ant) 5, 283–96.Google Scholar
Zago, G. (2020), Phaedrus: Fabulae Aesopiae. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Zair, N. (2018), ‘Latin bardus and gurdus’, Glotta, 311–18.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, R. and Portner, P. (2003), ‘Exclamative Clauses: At the Syntax-Semantics Interface’, Language 79, 39–81.Google Scholar
Zeleny, K. (2008), Itali modi. Vienna.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1974), ‘Ennian Experiments’, AJPh 95, 137–40.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2007), ‘The Influence of Cicero on Ennius’, in Fitzgerald, and Gowers, (2007), 1–16.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2018), Critics, Compilers, and Commentators: An Introduction to Roman Philology, 200 bce –800 ce . Oxford.Google Scholar
Zillinger, W. (1911), Cicero und die altrömischen Dichter. Diss. Würzburg.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, J. L. (1986), ‘La fin de Falerii Veteres: Un témoignage archéologique’, GMusJ 14, 37–42.Google Scholar
Zingerle, A. (1893), T. Livi ab urbe condita libri, 6.2, liber xxxix, xl. Vienna, Prague, and Leipzig.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by J. N. Adams, All Souls College, Oxford, Anna Chahoud, Trinity College Dublin, Giuseppe Pezzini, Corpus Christi College, Oxford
  • Book: Early Latin
  • Online publication: 27 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671132.034
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by J. N. Adams, All Souls College, Oxford, Anna Chahoud, Trinity College Dublin, Giuseppe Pezzini, Corpus Christi College, Oxford
  • Book: Early Latin
  • Online publication: 27 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671132.034
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by J. N. Adams, All Souls College, Oxford, Anna Chahoud, Trinity College Dublin, Giuseppe Pezzini, Corpus Christi College, Oxford
  • Book: Early Latin
  • Online publication: 27 July 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671132.034
Available formats
×