Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:13:31.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The ceramic production environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

Philip J. Arnold III
Affiliation:
Skidmore College, New York
Get access

Summary

Although central to the study of ceramic ecology (e.g. Matson 1965), the role of the environment in ceramic production has only recently been addressed in a systematic fashion (Arnold 1985). Arnold's ethnographic synthesis demonstrates how both the natural and social environment are intimately related to the character and tempo of pottery manufacture. For example, the availability and quality of clay, temper, and fuel can help determine the location and scale of production efforts (Arnold 1985:20–60; Nicklin 1979). Climate can regulate drying time, firing opportunities, and the length of the production season (Arnold 1985:61–98). Population pressure and market demand may also contribute to the development and trajectory of a production industry (Arnold 1985:171–201; Rice 1984a:249–250, 255–257).

This chapter describes the Tuxtlas production environment from the perspective of ceramic ecology. It places the potters and production communities in a natural and social environmental context and explores some of the factors regulating pottery manufacture. These factors include weather patterns, the quality and accessibility of raw material, and the demographic and labor organization of the Tuxtlas potters.

This ecological discussion underscores the relative homogeneity in the Tuxtlas production environment. Potters have access to similar suites of raw material and there are minimal climatic differences between the production communities. The potters' social environment is characterized by comparable household demographics and subsistence activities. Given this overall similarity, one might also expect consistency in the potters' tools and production techniques.

Type
Chapter
Information
Domestic Ceramic Production and Spatial Organization
A Mexican Case Study in Ethnoarchaeology
, pp. 11 - 34
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×