Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-25T01:11:01.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part 2 - Dementia and Diagnostics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2024

Edited by
Peter Muntigl ,
Charlotta Plejert  and
Danielle Jones
Peter Muntigl
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
Charlotta Plejert
Affiliation:
Linköpings Universitet, Sweden
Danielle Jones
Affiliation:
University of Bradford
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Dementia and Language
The Lived Experience in Interaction
 , pp. 23 - 100
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Alzheimer’s Society (2015) Helping you to assess cognition: A practical toolkit for clinicians. Available at: www.wamhinpc.org.uk/sites/default/files/dementia-practical-toolkit-for-clinicians.pdf.Google Scholar
Atkinson, M. and Drew, P. (1979) Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: The Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, W. A. (1993) ‘Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “Okay” usages’. Journal of Pragmatics, 19: 325–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beishon, L. C., Batterham, A. P., Quinn, T. J., Nelson, C. P., Panerai, R. B., Robinson, T. and Haunton, V. J. (2019) ‘Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III (ACE‑III) and mini‐ACE for the detection of dementia and mild cognitive impairment’. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (12) CD013282. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013282.pub2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolden, G. (2006) ‘Little words that matter: Discourse markers “so” and “oh” and the doing of other‐attentiveness in social interaction’. Journal of Communication, 56(4): 661–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, D. and Schurmann Vignaga, S. (2019) ‘Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination III in the diagnosis of dementia: A critical review’. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 15(15): 441–447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Button, G. (1987) ‘Answers as interactional products: Two sequential practices used in interviews’. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2): 160–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, S. M., Gibb, M., Bruce, I., Headon, M. and Drury, M. (2008) ‘‘I was worried coming in because I don’t really know why it was arranged’: The subjective experience of new patients and their primary caregivers attending a memory clinic’. Dementia, 7(2): 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, P. and Sweller, J. (1991) ‘Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction’. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4): 293–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheston, R., Bender, M. and Byatt, S. (2000) ‘Involving people who have dementia in the evaluation of services: A review’. Journal of Mental Health, 9(5): 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, S. E. (1988) ‘Displaying neutrality in television news interviews’. Social Problems, 35(4): 474–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, S. E. and Heritage, J. (2002) The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, S. E., Heritage, J. and Hill, A. M. J. (2020) ‘Gender matters in questioning presidents’. Journal of Language and Politics, 19(1): 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, S., Whitnall, L., Robertson, J. and Evans, J. J. (2012) ‘A systematic review of the accuracy and clinical utility of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination and the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised in the diagnosis of dementia’. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 27: 659–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dooley, J., Bass, N. and McCabe, R. (2018) ‘How do doctors deliver a diagnosis of dementia in memory clinics?’ British Journal of Psychiatry, 212(4): 239–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drew, P., Raymond, G. and Weinberg, D. (eds.) (2006) Talking Research: Language and Interaction in Sociological Methodology. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsey, C., Drew, P., Jones, D., Blackburn, D., Wakefield, S., Harkness, K. and Reuber, M. (2015) ‘Towards diagnostic conversational profiles of patients presenting with dementia or functional memory disorders to memory clinics’. Patient Education and Counselling, 98(9): 1071–1077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goffman, E. (1955) ‘On face-work’. Psychiatry, 18(3): 213–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Heath, C. (1992) ‘The delivery and reception of diagnosis in the general-practice consultation’. In Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (eds.) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 235–267.Google Scholar
Hepburn, A. (2004) ‘Crying: Notes on description, transcription, and interaction’. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(3): 251–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. (1998) ‘Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry’. Language in Society, 27: 291–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. (2002) ‘Ad hoc inquiries: Two preferences in the design of routine questions in an open context’. In Maynard, D. W., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., Schaeffer, N. C. and van der Zouwen, H. (eds.) Standardization and Tacit Knowledge Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: Wiley, pp. 313–333.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. and Maynard, D. W. (2006) Communication in Medical Care. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. and Sorjonen, M. L. (1994) ‘Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design’. Language in Society, 23(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. and Stivers, T. (1999) ‘Online commentary in acute medical visits: A method of shaping patient expectations’. Social Science & Medicine, 49: 1501–1517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heritage, J., Robinson, J., Elliott, M., Veckett, M. and Wilkes, M. (2007) ‘Reducing patients’ unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can make’. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22: 1429–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoey, E. M. (2013) ‘Do sighs matter? Interactional perspectives on sighing’. Berkeley Linguistics Society 61–74, https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v39i1.3870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoey, E. M. (2020) ‘Waiting to inhale: On sniffing in conversation’. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1): 118–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (1995) ‘Meeting both ends: Between standardization and recipient design in telephone survey interviews’. In Ten Have, P. and Psathas, G. (eds.) Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities. Washington, DC: University Press of America pp. 91–107.Google Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (1997) ‘Being friendly in survey interviews’. Journal of Pragmatics, 28: 591–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000) Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview. The Living Questionnaire. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. and Antaki, C. (1997) ‘Creating happy people by asking yes-no questions’. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(4): 285–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, S., Schubert, S., Hoon, C., Mioshi, E. and Hodges, J. R. (2013) ‘Validation of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease’. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 36(3–4): 242–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, D., Drew, P., Elsey, C., Blackburn, D., Wakefield, S., Harkness, K. and Reuber, M. (2016) ‘Conversational assessment in memory clinic encounters: interactional profiling for differentiating dementia from functional memory disorders’. Aging & Mental Health, 20(5): 500–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, D., Wilkinson, R., Jackson, C. and Drew, P. (2020) ‘Variation and interactional non-standardization in neuropsychological tests: The case of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination’. Qualitative Health Research, 30(3): 458–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koole, T. (2010) ‘Displays of epistemic access: Student responses to teacher explanations’. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(2): 183–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leydon, G. M. and Barnes, R. K. (2020) ‘Conversation Analysis’. In Pope, C. and Mays, N. (4 ed.) Qualitative Research in Health Care. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Publications, pp. 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindeberg, S., Samuelsson, C. and Müller, N. (2019) ‘Swedish clinical professionals’ perspectives on evaluating cognitive and communicative function in dementia’. Clinical Gerontologist, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2019.1701168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majlesi, A. R. and Plejert, C. (2018) ‘Embodiment in tests of cognitive functioning: A study of an interpreter-mediated dementia evaluation’. Dementia, 17(2): 138–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marlaire, C. and Maynard, D. W. (1990) ‘Standardized testing as an interactional phenomenon’. Sociology of Education, 63: 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, D. W. (2017) ‘Delivering bad news in emergency care medicine’. Acute Medicine & Surgery, 4(1): 3–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard, D. W. and Marlaire, C. L. (1992) ‘Good reasons for bad testing performance: The interactional substrate of educational exams’. Qualitative Sociology, 15(2): 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, D. and Schaeffer, N. C. (2006) ‘Standardization-in-interaction: The survey interview’. In Drew, P.., Raymond, G.. and Weinberg, D. (eds.) Talking Research: Language and Interaction in Sociological Methodology. London: Sage, pp. 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, D. W. and Turowetz, J. (2017) ‘Doing testing: How concrete competence can facilitate or inhibit performances of children with autism spectrum disorder’. Qualitative Sociology, 40: 467–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, D. W., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., Schaeffer, N. C. and van der Zouwen, H. (2002) Standardization and Tacit Knowledge Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
McHoul, A. (1978) ‘The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom’. Language in Society, 7: 183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H., Hertweck, A. and Meihls, J. L. (1986) Handicapping the Handicapped: Decision-Making in Students’ Educational Careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, M. (1980) ‘On the use of “OK” in service encounters’. In Shuy, R. W. and Shnukal, A. (eds.) Language Use and the Uses of Language. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 162–172.Google Scholar
Nielsen, T. R., Segers, K., Vanderaspoilden, V., Beinhoff, U., Minthon, L., Pissiota, A., Bekkhus-Wetterberg, P., Bjørkløf, G. H., Tsolaki, M., Gkioka, M. and Waldemar, G. (2019) ‘Validation of a brief Multicultural Cognitive Examination (MCE) for evaluation of dementia’. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 34(7): 982–989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panegyres, P. K., Berry, R. and Burchell, J. (2016) ‘Early dementia screening’. Diagnostics, 6(1): 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennington, C., Newson, M., Hayre, M. and Coulthard, E. (2015) ‘Functional cognitive disorder: What is it and what to do about it?’ Practical Neurology, 15(6): 436–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, A. (1998) ‘Authority and accountability: The delivery of diagnosis in primary health care’. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61: 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pond, C. D., Mate, K. E., Phillips, J., Stocks, N. P., Magin, P. J., Weaver, N. and Brodaty, H. (2013) ‘Predictors of agreement between general practitioner detection of dementia and the revised Cambridge Cognitive Assessment (CAMCOG‑R)’. International Psychogeriatrics, 25(10): 1639–1647, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610213000884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raymond, G. (2003) ‘Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding’. American Sociological Review, 68(6): 939–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuber, M., Blackburn, D., Elsey, C., Wakefield, S., Ardern, K., Harkness, K., Venneri, A., Jones, D., Shaw, C. and Drew, P. (2018) ‘An interactional profile to assist the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative and functional memory disorders’. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders: An International Journal, 32(3): 197–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reuber, M., Monzoni, C., Sharrack, B. and Plug, L. (2009) ‘Using interactional and linguistic analysis to distinguish between epileptic and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: A prospective, blinded multirater study’. Epilepsy & Behavior, 16: 139–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Right Decisions Service (2017) ACE-III and M-ACE English Guide 2017. Available https://rightdecisions.scot.nhs.uk/media/vk2cizbp/ace-iii-scoring-guide-uk-2017.pdf.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. D. and Heritage, J. (2014) ‘Intervening with conversation analysis: The case of medicine’. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(3): 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation (Vol. II, Jefferson, G., ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1972) ‘Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place’. In Sudnow, D. (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction. New York: The Free Press, pp. 75–119.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1992) ‘Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation’. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5): 1295–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, M. and Peräkylä, A. (2012) ‘Deontic rights in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide’. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(3): 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T. (2002) ‘Participating in decisions about treatment: Overt parent pressure for antibiotic medication in pediatric encounters’. Social Science & Medicine, 54: 1111–1130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stivers, T. (2007) Prescribing under Pressure: Parent-Physician Conversations and Antibiotics. London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T. and Barnes, R. (2018) ‘Treatment recommendation actions, contingencies, and responses: An introduction’. Health Communication, 33(11): 1331–1334, https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1350914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swallow, J. and Hillman, A. (2018) ‘Fear and anxiety: Affects, emotions and care practices in the memory clinic’. Social Studies of Science, https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718820965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toerien, M. (2021) ‘When do patients exercise their right to refuse treatment? A conversation analytic study of decision-making trajectories in UK neurology outpatient consultations’. Social Science and Medicine, 290: 114278, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venneri, A. (2005) ‘The promised land: The blooming business of neurosychological assessment guidance books’. Cortex, 41: 96–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, R. (2013) ‘The interactional organization of aphasia naming testing’. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 27(10–11): 805–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Albury, C. V. A., Ziebland, S., Webb, H., Stokoe, E. and Aveyard, P. (2021) ‘Discussing weight loss opportunistically and effectively in family practice: A qualitative study of clinical interactions using conversation analysis in UK family practice.’ Fam Pract, 38: 321–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, C., Dooley, J. and McCabe, R. (2019) ‘How do they want to know?’ Doctors’ perspectives on making and communicating a diagnosis of dementia.’ Dementia (London), 18: 3004–3022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergen, C., Stivers, T., Barnes, R. K., Heritage, J., McCabe, R., Thompson, L. and Toerien, M. (2018) ‘Closing the deal: A cross-cultural comparison of treatment resistance.’ Health Commun, 33: 1377–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byszewski, A. M., Molnar, F. J., Aminzadeh, F., Eisner, M., Gardezi, F. and Bassett, R. (2007) ‘Dementia diagnosis disclosure: A study of patient and caregiver perspectives.’ Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 21: 107–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahill, S., Gibb, M., Bruce, I., Headon, M. and Drury, M. (2008) ‘“I was worried coming in because I don’t really know why it was arranged”: The subjective experience of new patients and their primary caregivers attending a memory clinic.’ Dementia, 7: 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, S., Manthorpe, J., Samsi, K., Abley, C., Robinson, L., Watts, S., Bond, J. and Keady, J. (2016) ‘Living with uncertainty: Mapping the transition from pre-diagnosis to a diagnosis of dementia.’ J Aging Stud, 37: 40–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clare, L., Whitaker, C. J., Nelis, S. M., Martyr, A., Markova, I. S., Roth, I., Woods, R. T. and Morris, R. G. (2013) ‘Self-concept in early stage dementia: Profile, course, correlates, predictors and implications for quality of life.’ Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 28: 494–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dooley, J. (2017) Communicating a Diagnosis of Dementia. PhD, University of Exeter.Google Scholar
Dooley, J., Bass, N. and McCabe, R. (2018) ‘How do doctors deliver a diagnosis of dementia in memory clinics?’ Br J Psychiatry, 212: 239–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dooley, J., Bass, N., Livingston, G. and McCabe, R. (2019) ‘Involving patients with dementia in decisions to initiate treatment: Effect on patient acceptance, satisfaction and medication prescription.’ Br J Psychiatry, 214: 213–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goffman, E. (1967) ‘On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction.’ In Goffman, Erving (ed.) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Haakana, M. (2001) ‘Laughter as a patient’s resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction.’ Text & Talk, 21: 187–219.Google Scholar
Harman, G. and Clare, L. (2006) ‘Illness representations and lived experience in early-stage dementia.’ Qualitative Health Research, 16: 484–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedman, R., Hellström, I., Ternestedt, B. M., Hansebo, G. and Norberg, A. (2014) ‘Social positioning by people with Alzheimer’s disease in a support group.’ J Aging Stud, 28: 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, A. and Bolden, G. B. (2013) ‘The conversation analytic approach to transcription.’ In Hepburn, A. and Bolden, G. B. (eds.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984) ‘A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement.’ In Atkinson, J. and Heritage, J. (eds.) Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (2011) ‘Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction.’ In Stivers, T., Mondada, L. and Steensig, J. (eds.) The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (2015) ‘Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 88: 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karnieli-Miller, O., Werner, P., Aharon-Peretz, J., Sinoff, G. and Eidelman, S. (2012) ‘Expectations, experiences, and tensions in the memory clinic: The process of diagnosis disclosure of dementia within a triad.’ Int Psychogeriatr, 24: 1756–1770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunneman, M., Pel-Littel, R., Bouwman, F. H., Gillissen, F., Schoonenboom, N. S. M., Claus, J. J., Van Der Flier, W. M. and Smets, E. M. A. (2017) ‘Patients’ and caregivers’ views on conversations and shared decision making in diagnostic testing for Alzheimer’s disease: The ABIDE project.’ Alzheimers Dement (N Y), 3: 314–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markova, I. S., Clare, L., Whitaker, C. J., Roth, I., Nelis, S. M., Martyr, A., Roberts, J. L., Woods, R. T. and Morris, R. (2014) ‘Phenomena of awareness in dementia: Heterogeneity and its implications.’ Conscious Cogn, 25: 17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard, D. W. (2003) Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCabe, R., Pavlickova, H., Xanthopoulou, P., Bass, N. J., Livingston, G. and Dooley, J. (2019) ‘Patient and companion shared decision making and satisfaction with decisions about starting cholinesterase medication at dementia diagnosis.’ Age Ageing, 48: 711–718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlynn, S. and Schacter, D. (1989) ‘Unawareness of deficits in neuropsychological syndromes.’ Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, 11: 143–205.Google ScholarPubMed
Milne, A. (2010) ‘The ‘D’ word: Reflections on the relationship between stigma, discrimination and dementia.’ Journal of Mental Health, 19: 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mograbi, D. C., Ferri, C. P., Sosa, A. L., Stewart, R., Laks, J., Brown, R. and Morris, R. G. (2012) ‘Unawareness of memory impairment in dementia: A population-based study.’ Int Psychogeriatr, 24: 931–939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, J. I. and Muskett, T. (2020) ‘Interactional misalignment in the UK NHS 111 healthcare telephone triage service.’ International Journal of Medical Informatics, 134: 104030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murdoch, J., Barnes, R., Pooler, J., Lattimer, V., Fletcher, E. and Campbell, J. L. (2015) ‘The impact of using computer decision-support software in primary care nurse-led telephone triage: Interactional dilemmas and conversational consequences.’ Social Science & Medicine, 126: 36–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peel, E. (2014) ‘“The living death of Alzheimer’s” versus “Take a walk to keep dementia at bay”: Representations of dementia in print media and carer discourse.’ Sociol Health Illn, 36: 885–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, C., Jones, I. R. and Clare, L. (2017) ‘Illness representations in caregivers of people with dementia.’ Aging Ment Health, 21: 553–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabat, S. and Harre, R. (1992) ‘The construction and deconstruction of self in Alzheimer’s disease.’ Ageing & Society, 12: 443–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, P. (1998) ‘“You’re out of your mind!”: Humor as a face-saving strategy during neuropsychological examinations.’ Neurological Disorders & Brain Damage, 10: 357–372.Google ScholarPubMed
Schegloff, E. A. (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T. (2005) ‘Parent resistance to physicians’ treatment recommendations: One resource for initiating a negotiation of the treatment decision.’ Health Commun, 18: 41–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stivers, T. and Barnes, R. K. (2018) ‘Treatment recommendation actions, contingencies, and responses: An introduction.’ Health Commun, 33: 1331–1334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stivers, T. and Timmermans, S. (2017) ‘Always look on the bright side of life: Making bad news bivalent.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50: 404–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T., Heritage, J., Barnes, R. K., McCabe, R., Thompson, L. and Toerien, M. (2018) ‘Treatment recommendations as actions.’ Health Commun, 33: 1335–1344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voutilainen, L., Peräkylä, A. and Ruusuvuori, J. (2010) ‘Misalignment as a therapeutic resource.’ Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7: 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, S. and Kitzinger, C. (2006) ‘Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation.’ Social Psychology Quarterly, 69: 150–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Aburto Maldonado, J. and Eklind, L. (2021) Tolksamarbete inom logopediska verksamheter. En enkätstudie ur tolkarnas perspektiv. [Interpreter Collaboration in Speech and Language Therapy Activities. A Questionnaire Study from the Interpreters’ Perspective]. MA thesis. Linköping University. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1567407/FULLTEXT01.pdf.Google Scholar
Alzheimer Europe (2018) The Development of Intercultural Care and Support for People with Dementia from Minority Ethnic Groups. www.alzheimer-europe.org/sites/default/files/alzheimer_europe_ethics_report_2018.pdf (retrieved 19 January 2022).Google Scholar
Antaki, C. (2011) Applied Conversation Analysis. Intervention and Change in Institutional Talk. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Antelius, E. and Kiwi, M. (2015) ‘Frankly, none of us know what dementia is: Dementia caregiving among Iranian immigrants living in Sweden’. Care Management Journals, 16(2): 79–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bockgård, G. (2004) Syntax som social resurs: en studie av samkonstruktionssekvensers form och funktion i svenska samtal [Syntax as a Social Resource: A Study of Form and Function of Co-construction Sequences in Swedish Conversation]. Doctoral dissertation. Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Bolden, G. (2000) ‘Toward understanding practices of medical interpreting: Interpreter’s involvement in history taking. Discourse Analysis, 2(4): 387–419.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. and Goodwin, C. (1986) ‘Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word.’ Semiotica, 62: 51–75.Google Scholar
Gove, D., Nielsen, T. R., Smits, C., Plejert, C., Rauf, M. A., Parveen, S., Jaakson, S., Golan Shemesh, D., Lahav, D., Kaur, R., Herz, M. K., Monses, J., Thyrian, J. R. and Georges, J. (2021) ‘The challenges of achieving timely diagnosis and culturally appropriate care of people with dementia from minority ethnic groups in Europe.’ International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 36: 1823–1828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, E. and Kramer, E. M. (2012) ‘Medical interpreters as tools: Dangers and challenges in the utilitarian approach to interpreters’ roles and functions.’ Patient Education & Counselling, 89(1): 158–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jansson, G. (2014) ‘Bridging language barriers in multilingual care encounters.’ Multilingua, 33(1–2): 201–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansson, G., Plejert, C. and Lindholm, C. (2019) ‘The social organization of assistance in multilingual interaction in Swedish residential care.’ Discourse Studies 21(1): 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D., Wilkinson, R., Jackson, C. and Drew, P. (2020) ‘Variation and interactional non-standardization in neuropsychological tests: The case of the Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination.’ Qualitative Health Research 30(3): 458–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kammarkollegiet [The Legal, Financial and Administrative Services Agency] (2020) God tolksed [Good Interpreting Practice]. www.kammarkollegiet.se/download/18.27f1fe4c168c1d817515205f/1551777027993/God_tolksed_mars2019.pdf (retrieved 19 January 2022).Google Scholar
Karliner, L. S., Jacobs, E. A., Chen, A. H. and Mutha, S. (2007) ‘Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature.’ Health Services Research, 42(2): 727–754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langdon, W. H. and Saenz, T. I. (2016) Working with Interpreters and Translators: A Guide for Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H. (2004) ‘Collaborative turn sequences’, in Lerner, G. H. (ed.) Conversation Analysis. Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 225–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindholm, C. (2008) ‘Laughter, communication problems, and dementia.’ Communication & Medicine 5(1): 3–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majlesi, A. R. and Plejert, C. (2018) ‘Embodiment in tests of cognitive functioning: A study of an interpreter-mediated dementia evaluation.’ Dementia – the International Journal of Social Research & Practice, 17(2): 138–163.Google ScholarPubMed
Migrationsskolan (2019) Inga om men eller varför: att främja säker och jämlik kognitiv utredning genom tolk [No Ifs, Buts or Whys: To Promote Safe and Equal Cognitive Screening Using an Interpreter] Migrationsskolan report 2019:2. https://vardgivare.skane.se/kompetens-utveckling/rapporter/rapport/inga-om-men-eller-varfor/ (retrieved 19 January 2022).Google Scholar
Nasreddine, S. Z. (2003–2017) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment MoCA, www.mocatest.org (retrieved 19 January 2022).Google Scholar
Nielsen, T. R. and Jørgensen, K. (2013) ‘Visuoconstructional abilities in cognitively healthy illiterate Turkish immigrants: A quantitative and qualitative investigation.’ The Clinical Neuropsychologist 27(4): 681–692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, T. R., Vogel, A., Phung, T. K., Gade, A. and Waldemar, G. (2011a) ‘Over- and under-diagnosis of dementia in ethnic minorities: A nationwide register-based study.’ International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 26(11): 1128–1135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, T. R., Vogel, A., Riepe, M. W., de Mendonca, A., Rodriguez, G., Nobili, F., Fade, A. and Waldemar, G. (2011b) ‘Assessment of dementia in ethnic minority patients in Europe: A European Alzheimer’s disease consortium survey.’ International Psychogeriatrics, 23(1): 89–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, T. R., Andersen, B. B., Kastrup, M., Phung, T. K. T. and Waldemar, G. (2011c) ‘Quality of dementia diagnostic evaluation for ethnic minority patients: A nationwide study.’ Dementia & Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 31: 388–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, T. R., Segers, K., Vanderaspoilden, V., Beinhoff, U., Minthon, L., Pissiota, A., Bekkhus-Wetterberg, P., Hanevold Bjørkløf, G., Tsolaki, M., Gkioka, M. and Waldemar, G. (2019) ‘Validation of a European cross-cultural neuropsychological test battery (CNTB) for evaluation of dementia.’ International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 34(1): 144–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plejert, C. (2022) ‘Challenges and remedies for interpreter-mediated dementia assessments’, in Gavioli, L. and Wadensjö, C. (eds.) Routledge Handbook on Public Service Interpreting. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plejert, C., Antelius, E., Yazdanpanah, M. and Nielsen, T. R. (2015) ‘“There’s a letter called ef.” On challenges and repair in interpreter-mediated tests of cognitive functioning in dementia evaluations: A case study.’ Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 30: 163–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raymond, W. C. (2014) ‘Conveying information in the interpreter-mediated medical visit: The case of epistemic brokering.’ Patient Education & Counselling, 97: 38–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Small, J., Chan, S. M., Drance, E., Globerman, J., Hulko, W., O’Connor, D., Perry, J., Stern, L. and Ho, L. (2015) ‘Verbal and non-verbal indicators of quality of communication between care staff and residents in ethnoculturally and linguistically diverse long-term care settings.’ Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 30: 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-015-9269-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söderman, M. and Rosendahl, S. P. (2016) ‘Caring for ethnic older people living with dementia: Experiences of nursing staff.’ Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 31(3): 311–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torkpoor, R., Fioretos, I., Essén, B. and Londos, E. (2022) ‘I know hyena. Do you know hyena? Challenges in interpreter-mediated dementia assessments, focusing on the role of the interpreter.’ Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 37: 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van De Mieroop, D., Bevilacqua, G. and Van Hove, L. (2012) ‘Negotiating discursive norms: Community interpreting in a Belgian rest home.’ Interpreting, 14(1): 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadensjö, C. (1998) Interpreting as Interaction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. (2007) ‘Managing linguistic incompetence as a delicate issue in aphasic talk-in-interaction: On the use of laughter in prolonged repair sequences.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3): 542–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yildiz, K., Aki, O. E., Can, U. A., Derle, E., Kibaroglu, S. and Barak, A. (2014) ‘Validation of Montreal Cognitive Assessment and discriminant power of Montreal Cognitive Assessment subtests in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer dementia in Turkish population.’ Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 27(2): 103–109.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×