Book contents
- Critical Race Judgments
- Critical Race Judgments
- Copyright page
- Contents
- About the Contributors
- Advisory Committee
- Foreword
- Introduction
- 347 U.S. 483 (1954)BROWN et al.
- Part I Membership and Inclusion
- Part II Participation and Access
- Part III Property and Space
- Part IV Intimate Choice and Autonomy
- Part V Justice
Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2022
Book contents
- Critical Race Judgments
- Critical Race Judgments
- Copyright page
- Contents
- About the Contributors
- Advisory Committee
- Foreword
- Introduction
- 347 U.S. 483 (1954)BROWN et al.
- Part I Membership and Inclusion
- Part II Participation and Access
- Part III Property and Space
- Part IV Intimate Choice and Autonomy
- Part V Justice
Summary
“Is it possible to be both a judge and a feminist?” So opens Feminist Judgments, a collection of key decisions in English law rewritten by feminist legal scholars.1 It is a provocative question, and one that prompted us, a group of Critical Race Theorists, to open this book, Critical Race Judgments, with a similar question: “Is it possible to be both a judge and a Critical Race Theorist?” On one view, the answer is a resounding “no.” To put the point the way two critics of the genre once did, Critical Race Theory, which simply aims to expose and eliminate ongoing forms of racial inequality, is “beyond all reason.”2
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Critical Race JudgmentsRewritten U.S. Court Opinions on Race and the Law, pp. 1 - 24Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022