Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T13:01:36.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Larry Alexander  and
Kimberly Kessler Ferzan
With
Stephen J. Morse
Larry Alexander
Affiliation:
University of San Diego School of Law
Kimberly Kessler Ferzan
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania Law School
Stephen J. Morse
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania Law School
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Crime and Culpability
A Theory of Criminal Law
 , pp. 331 - 348
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annotated Code of Maryland, Criminal Law (2007).
Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).
Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (West 1998).
Arizona v. Henley, 687 P. 2d 1220 (Ariz. 1984).
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002).
Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002).
Baltimore & O.R.R. v. Goodman, 275 U.S. 66 (1927).
Berry v. Sugar Notch Borough, 43 A. 240 (Pa. 1899).
Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004).
Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932).
Brown v. Indiana, 830 N.E.2d 956 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005).
California v. Hamilton, 47 Cal. Rptr. 2d 343 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995).
Code of Alabama (West 1975).
Code of Georgia Annotated (2007).
Connecticut General Statutes Annotated (2007).
California Penal Code (West 1999).
City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999).
Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland v. Maxwell, (1978) 3 All E.R. 1140.
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 579 (1965).
Hawaii Revised Statutes (2006).
Illinois v. Wicks, 823 N.E.2d 1153 (Ill. Ct. App. 2005).
In re Steven S., 31 Cal. Rptr. 644 (1994).
Kansas v. Harris, 162 P. 3d 28 (Kan. 2007).
Kansas v. Neal, 120 P. 3d 366 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005).
Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 (1982).
Ladner v. United States, 358 U.S. 169 (1958).
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
Martin v. Ohio, 480 U.S. 228 (1987).
Maryland Code Annotated (2007).
Mattingly v. United States, 924 F.2d 785 (8th Cir. 1991).
Michigan Compiled Laws Annotated (2007).
Missouri Revised Statutes (2007).
Missouri v. Hunter, 459 U.S. 359 (1983).
Model Penal Code (Official Draft and Revised Comments) (1985).
New Jersey Statutes Annotated (West 2007).
New York Education Law (2001)
New York Penal Law (McKinney1999).
New York Penal Law (2003).
New York Penal Law (2007).
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company, 162 N.E. 99 (N.Y. 1928).
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes Annotated (West 2003).
People v. Anderson, 447 P. 2d 942 (1968).
People v. Decina, 138 N.E.2d 799 (N.Y. 1956).
People v. Dlugash, 363 N.E.2d 1155 (N.Y. 1977).
People v. Luparello, 231 Cal. Rptr. 832 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986).
People v. Myers, 426 N.E.2d 535 (Ill. 1981).
People v. Myers, 816 N.E.2d 820 (Ill. Ct. App. 2004).
People v. Payne, 819 N.E.2d 634 (N.Y. 2004);
People v. Rizzo, 158 N.E. 888, 889 (N.Y. 1927).
People v. Suarez, 844 N.E.2d 721 (N.Y. 2005).
Pokora v. Wabash Ry. Co., 292 U.S. 98 (1934).
Regina v. Smith (David), (1974) 2 Q.B. 354.
Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical Harm (Proposed Final Draft No. 1, 2005).
Sanchez-Rengifo v. United States, 815 A.2d 351 (D.C. Ct. App. 2002).
Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510 (1979).
Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 607 P. 2d 924 (Cal. 1980).
Smith v. United States, 295 A.2d 60 (D.C. Ct. App. 1972).
State v. LaFreniere, 481 N.W.2d 412 (Neb. 1992).
State v. Stanko, 974 P. 2d 1132 (Mont. 1998).
State v. Williams, 484 P. 2d 1167 (Wash. Ct. App. 1971).
Stephenson v. State, 179 N.E. 633 (Ind. 1932).
Summers v. Tice, 199 P. 2d 1 (Cal. 1948) (en banc).
Terry v. Ohio, 393 U.S. 1 (1968).
Texas Penal Code Annotated (2007).
Thabo Meli v. Regina, (1954) 1 All E.R. 373.
United States Code, title 18, § 1346 (2000).
United States Constitution, Amendment V.
United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2005).
United States v. Bergman, 416 F. Supp. 496 (S.D.N.Y. 1976).
United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).
United States v. Brumley, 116 F.3d 728 (5th Cir. 1997).
United States v. Carroll Towing Co., 159 F.2d. 169 (2d Cir. 1947).
United States v. Czubinski, 106 F.3d 1069 (1st Cir. 1997).
United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688 (1993).
United States v. Incorporated Village of Island Park, 888 F. Supp. 419 (E.D.N.Y. 1995).
United States v. Jewell, 532 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1976).
United States v. Johnson, 964 F.2d 124 (1992).
United States v. Mancuso, 42 F.3d 836 (4th Cir. 1994).
United States v. Oviedo, 525 F.2d 881 (5th Cir. 1976).
United States v. Ragen, 314 U.S. 513 (1942).
United States v. Sawyer, 239 F.3d 31 (1st Cir. 2001).
United States v. Whittington, 26 F.3d 456 (4th Cir. 1994).
Village of Sugar Grove v. Rich, 808 N.E.2d 525 (Ill. Ct. App. 2004).
Washington v. Soonalole, 992 P. 2d 541 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000).
Wisconsin v. Rabe, 291 N.W.2d 809 (Wis. 1980).
Alexander, Larry. “A Unified Excuse of Preemptive Self-Protection,” Notre Dame Law Review 74 (1999), 1475–1506.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry. “Consent, Punishment, and Proportionality,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 15 (1986), 178–182.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry. “Crime and Culpability,” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 5 (1994), 1–30.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry.“Criminal Liability for Omissions: An Inventory of Issues,” in Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (Shute, S. and Simester, A. P., eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 121–142.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry. “Deontology at the Threshold,” San Diego Law Review 37 (2000), 893–912.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry. “The Doomsday Machine: Proportionality, Prevention, and Punishment,” Monist 63 (1980), 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry. “Equal Protection and the Prosecution and Conviction of Crime,” University of Chicago Legal Forum (2002), 155–162.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry. “Foreword: Coleman and Corrective Justice,” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 15 (1992), 621–636.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry. “Harm, Offense and Morality,” 7 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 199 (1994).Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry. “Inculpatory and Exculpatory Mistakes and the Fact/Law Distinction: An Essay in Memory of Myke Bayles,” Law & Philosophy 12 (1993), 33–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry. “Insufficient Concern: A Unified Conception of Criminal Culpability,” California Law Review 88 (2000), 931–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry. “Lesser Evils: A Closer Look at the Paradigmatic Justification,” Law & Philosophy 24 (2005), 611–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry. “The Moral Magic of Consent (II),” Legal Theory 2 (1996), 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry.“The Philosophy of Criminal Law,” in The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy (Coleman, Jules and Shapiro, Scott, eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 815–867.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry. “Reconsidering the Relationship among Voluntary Acts, Strict Liability, and Negligence in Criminal Law,” Social Philosophy & Policy 7 (1990), 84–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry. “Scalar Properties, Binary Judgments,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2008), 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry. “Unknowingly Justified Actors and the Attempt/Success Distinction,” Tulsa Law Review 39 (2004), 851–860.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry, and Kimberly, Kessler Ferzan. “Culpable Acts of Risk Creation,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 5 (2008), 375–405.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry, and Kimberly, D. Kessler. “Mens Rea and Inchoate Crimes,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 87 (1997), 1138–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry, and Michael, S. Moore. “Deontological Ethics,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (November 21, 2007), available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-deontological/.
Alexander, Larry, and Emily, Sherwin. “The Deceptive Nature of Rules,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142 (1994), 1191–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry, and Emily, Sherwin. The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules and the Dilemmas of Law (Durham: Duke University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arenella, Peter. “Convicting the Morally Blameless: Reassessing the Relationship between Legal and Moral Accountability,” UCLA Law Review 39 (1992), 1511–1623.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard J. “Just Warfare Theory and Noncombatant Immunity,” Cornell International Law Journal 39 (2006), 663–688.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew. “The Doctrine of Provocation,” Cambridge Law Journal 35 (1976), 292–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Brenda M. “Mens Rea, Negligence, and Criminal Law Reform,” Law & Philosophy 6 (1987), 53–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkow, Rachel E. “Recharging the Jury: The Criminal Jury's Constitutional Role in an Era of Mandatory Sentencing,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 152 (2003), 33–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayles, Michael D.Principles of Law: A Normative Analysis (Dordrecht: D. Reidel; Norwell: sold and distributed in the U.S.A. and Canada by Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom L.“Who Deserves Autonomy, and Whose Autonomy Deserves Respect?” in Personal Autonomy: New Essays in Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy (Taylor, J. S. ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 310–329.Google Scholar
Benbaji, Yitzhak. “Culpable Bystanders, Innocent Threats and the Ethics of Self-Defense,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (2005), 585–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy.Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1781; Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1988).Google Scholar
Bergelson, Vera. “The Right to Be Hurt: Testing the Boundaries of Consent,” George Washington Law Review 75 (2007), 165–236.Google Scholar
Bergelson, Vera. “Victims and Perpetrators: An Argument for Comparative Liability in Criminal Law,” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 8 (2005), 385–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Mitchell N. “Justification and Excuse, Law and Morality,” Duke Law Journal 53 (2003), 1–78.Google Scholar
Berman, Mitchell N. “Lesser Evils and Justification: A Less Close Look,” Law and Philosophy 24 (2005), 681–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Mitchell N.“Punishment and Justification,” working paper (December 15, 2006), available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=956610.
Bierschbach, Richard A., and Alex Stein. “Mediating Rules in Criminal Law,” Virginia Law Review 93 (2007), 1197–1258.Google Scholar
Bok, Hilary.Freedom and Responsibility (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, James. “Punishment for Negligence: A Reply to Professor Hall,” Buffalo Law Review 22 (1972), 107–122.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael.Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Brown, Darryl K. “Plain Meaning, Practical Reason, and Culpability: Toward a Theory of Jury Interpretation of Criminal Statutes,” Michigan Law Review 96 (1998), 1199–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, B. Sharon. “Wrongdoing and Attribution: Implications beyond the Justification-Excuse Distinction,” Wayne Law Review 33 (1987), 1289–1342.Google Scholar
Cahill, Michael T. “Punishment Decisions at Conviction: Recognizing the Jury as Fault-Finder,” University of Chicago Legal Forum (2005), 91–148.
Cahill, Michael T. “Retributive Justice in the Real World,” Legal Studies Paper No. 77, Brooklyn Law School (2007), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=996140.
Calabresi, Guido, and Phillip, Bobbitt. Tragic Choices (New York: Norton, 1978).Google Scholar
Cardozo, Benjamin.What Medicine Can Do for Law (1930; Clark: Lawbook Exchange, 2005).Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, T. A.Double-Effect Reasoning: Doing Good and Avoiding Evil (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christopher, Russell L. “The Prosecutor's Dilemma: Bargains and Punishments,” Fordham Law Review 72 (2003), 93–168.Google Scholar
Conlisk, John. “Why Bounded Rationality,” Journal of Economic Literature 34 (1996), 669–700.Google Scholar
Dan-Cohen, Meir. “Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law,” Harvard Law Review 97 (1984), 625–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald.Essays on Actions and Events (2d ed., Oxford: Clarendon, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaney, Neil Francis. “A Note on Intention and the Doctrine of Double Effect,” Philosophical Studies 134 (2007), 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaney, Neil Francis. “Two Cheers for ‘Closeness’: Terror, Targeting and Double Effect,” Philosophical Studies 137 (2008), 335–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel Clement.Content and Consciousness (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; New York, Humanities Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel Clement.Freedom Evolves (New York: Viking, 2003).Google Scholar
Domsky, Darren. “There Is No Door: Finally Solving the Problem of Moral Luck,” Journal of Philosophy 101 (2004), 445–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domsky, Darren. “Double Jeopardy,” Georgetown Law Journal Annual Review of Criminal Procedure 35 (2006), 422–464.Google Scholar
Dressler, Joshua. “Battered Women Who Kill Their Sleeping Tormenters: Reflections on Maintaining Respect for Human Life While Killing Moral Monsters,” in Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (Shute, Stephen and Simester, A. P., eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 259–282.Google Scholar
Dressler, Joshua. “Does One Size Fit All? Thoughts on Alexander's Unified Conception of Criminal Culpability,” California Law Review 88 (2000), 955–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Joshua. “Justifications and Excuses: A Brief Review of the Concepts and the Literature,” Wayne Law Review 33 (1987), 1155–1176.Google Scholar
Dressler, Joshua.Understanding Criminal Law (4th ed., New York: Lexis, 2006).Google Scholar
Dressler, Joshua. “Why Keep the Provocation Defense?: Some Reflections on a Difficult Subject,” Minnesota Law Review 86 (2002), 959–1002.Google Scholar
Dubber, Marcus Dirk. “Toward a Constitutional Law of Crime and Punishment,” Hastings Law Journal 55 (2004), 509–572.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A.Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in Criminal Law (Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart, (2007).Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. “Crime, Prohibition, and Punishment,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2002), 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R. A. “Criminalizing Endangerment,” Louisiana Law Review 65 (2005), 941–967.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. “'I Might Be Guilty, But You Can't Try Me': Estoppel and Other Bars to Trial,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 1 (2003), 245–260.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A.Intention, Agency, and Criminal Liability: Philosophy of Action and the Criminal Law (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar
Duff, R. A. “Rethinking Justifications,” Tulsa Law Review 39 (2004), 829–850.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald, and David, Blumenfeld. “Punishment for Intentions,” Mind 75 (1966), 396–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmundson, William. “Morality without Responsibility,” manuscript on submission (2007), on file with author, University of San Diego School of Law.
Eisikovits, Nir. “Moral Luck and the Criminal Law,” in Law and Social Justice (Campbell, J. K., O'Rourke, M., and Shier, D., eds., Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2005), 105–124.Google Scholar
Enoch, David. “Ends, Means, Side-Effects, and Beyond: A Comment on the Justification of the Use of Force,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 7 (2005), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrich, Susan.Real Rape (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Ezorsky, Gertrude. “The Ethics of Punishment,” in Philosophical Perspectives on Punishment (Ezorsky, G., ed., Albany: State University of New York Press, 1972), xi–xxvi.Google Scholar
Fabre, Cecile.Whose Body Is It Anyway?: Justice and the Integrity of the Person (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel.Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel.Harm to Others (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel.Harm to Self (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel.Harmless Wrongdoing (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel.Offense to Others (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. “Act, Agency, and Indifference: The Foundations of Criminal Responsibility,” New Criminal Law Review 10 (2007), 441–457.Google Scholar
Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. “Beyond Intention,” Cardozo Law Review 29 (2008), 1147–1167.Google Scholar
Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. “Clarifying Consent: Peter Westen's The Logic of Consent,” Law & Philosophy 25 (2006), 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. “Defending Imminence: From Battered Women to Iraq,” Arizona Law Review 46 (2004), 213–262.Google Scholar
Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. “Don't Abandon the Model Penal Code Yet! Thinking Through Simons's Rethinking,” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 6 (2002), 185–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. “Holistic Culpability,” Cardozo Law Review 28 (2007), 2523–2544.Google Scholar
Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. “Justifying Self-Defense,” Law & Philosophy 24 (2005), 711–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. “Opaque Recklessness,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 91 (2001), 597–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, Claire O. “Excuses and Dispositions in Criminal Law,” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 6 (2002), 317–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, Claire O. “Self-Defense as Rational Excuse,” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 57 (1996), 621–650.Google Scholar
Fischer, John Martin. “'Punishment and Desert: A Reply to Dolinko,” Ethics 117 (2006), 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John Martin. “Recent Work on Moral Responsibility,” Ethics 110 (1999), 93–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, William J. “The Intend/Foresee Distinction and the Problem of ‘Closeness,’ ” Philosophical Studies 128 (2006), 585–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, George P.The Grammar of Criminal Law: American, Comparative, and International, vol. 1: Foundations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Fletcher, George P.“The Nature of Justification,” in Action and Value in Criminal Law (Shute, Stephen et al., eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), 175–186.Google Scholar
Fletcher, George P.Rethinking Criminal Law (Boston: Little, Brown, 1978).Google Scholar
Fletcher, George P. “The Right Deed for the Wrong Reason: A Reply to Mr. Robinson,” UCLA Law Review 23 (1975), 293–322.Google Scholar
Fletcher, George P. “Should Intolerable Prison Conditions Generate a Justification or an Excuse for Escape?” UCLA Law Review 26 (1979), 1355–1369.Google Scholar
Fletcher, George P.Structure and Function in Criminal Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Fletcher, George P. “The Theory of Criminal Negligence: A Comparative Analysis,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 119 (1971), 401–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry.Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. “The Case of the Speluncean Explorers,” Harvard Law Review 62 (1949), 616–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. “The Gist of Excuses,” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 1 (1998), 575–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J., and S. Shute. “The Wrongness of Rape,” in Oxford Essays on Jurisprudence (4th ser., Horder, J., ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 193–218.Google Scholar
Garvey, Stephen P. “Passion's Puzzle,” Iowa Law Review 90 (2005), 1677–1746.Google Scholar
Garvey, Stephen P. “Self-Defense and the Mistaken Racist,” New Criminal Law Review 11 (2008), 119–171.Google Scholar
Garvey, Stephen P. “What's Wrong with Involuntary Manslaughter?” Texas Law Review 85 (2006), 333–384.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I.A Theory of Human Action (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970).Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E., and Frank Jackson. “Freedom from Fear,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 35 (2007), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, John. “Virtue, Luck and the Pyrrhonian Problematic,” Philosophical Studies 130 (2006), 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Stuart.Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White-Collar Crime (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Guttenplan, Samuel D.A Companion to Philosophy of Mind (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994).Google Scholar
Haji, Ishtiyaque. “An Epistemic Dimension of Blameworthiness,” Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 57 (1997), 523–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Jerome. “Negligent Behavior Should Be Excluded from Penal Liability,” Columbia Law Review 63 (1963), 632–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpin, Andrew.Definition in the Criminal Law (Oxford: Hart, 2004).Google Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard E. “The Collapse of the Harm Principle,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 90 (1999), 109–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A.Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Haworth, Lawrence.Autonomy: An Essay in Philosophical Psychology and Ethics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hieronymi, Pamela. “Responsibility for Believing,” Synthese 16 (2008), 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, David. “Responsibility and Good Reasons,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 2 (2005), 471–484.Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell.The Common Law (London: Macmillan, 1881).Google Scholar
Horn, Mike. Note, “A Rude Awakening: What to Do with the Sleepwalking Defense?” Boston College Law Review 46 (2004), 149–182.Google Scholar
Huigens, Kyron.“Is Strict Liability Rape Defensible?” in Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special Part of the Criminal Law (Duff, R. A. and Green, Stuart P., eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 196–217.Google Scholar
Hurd, Heidi M. “Challenging Authority,” Yale Law Journal 100 (1991), 1611–1678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Heidi M. “Justification and Excuse, Wrongdoing and Culpability,” Notre Dame Law Review 74 (1999), 1551–1574.Google Scholar
Hurley, Paul E. “Does Consequentialism Make Too Many Demands, or None at All?” Ethics 116 (2006), 680–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas N. “Already Punished Enough,” Philosophical Topics 19 (1990), 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas N. “Crimes outside the Core,” Tulsa Law Review 39 (2004), 755–780.Google Scholar
Husak, Douglas N. “Guns and Drugs: Case Studies on the Principles Limits of the Criminal Sanction,” Law & Philosophy 23 (2004), 437–493.Google Scholar
Husak, Douglas N. “Justifications and the Criminal Liability of Accessories,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 80 (1989), 491–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas N.Legalize This! The Case for Decriminalizing Drugs (London: Verso, 2002).Google Scholar
Husak, Douglas N.Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Husak, Douglas N. “Rethinking the Act Requirement,” Cardozo Law Review 28 (2007), 2437–2460.Google Scholar
Husak, Douglas N. “The Sequential Principle of Relative Culpability,” Legal Theory 1 (1995), 493–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., and Callender, Craig A.. “Willful Ignorance, Knowledge, and the ‘Equal Culpability’ Thesis: A Study of the Deeper Significance of the Principle of Legality,” Wisconsin Law Review (1994), 29–70.
Hyman, David A. “Rescue without Law: An Empirical Perspective on the Duty to Rescue,” Texas Law Review 84 (2006), 653–738.Google Scholar
Jeffries, John Calvin, Jr. “Legality, Vagueness, and the Construction of Penal Statutes,” Virginia Law Review 71 (1985), 189–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadish, Sanford H. “Reckless Complicity,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 87 (1997), 369–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadish, Sanford H. “Respect for Life and Regard for Rights in the Criminal Law,” California Law Review 64 (1976), 871–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadish, Sanford H., and Schulhofer, Stephen J., eds. Criminal Law and Its Processes: Cases and Materials (7th ed., Boston: Little, Brown, 2001).
Kahan, Dan, and Nussbaum, Martha C.. “Two Conceptions of Emotion in Criminal Law,” Columbia Law Review 96 (1996), 269–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamm, F. M. “The Doctrine of Triple Effect,” Aristotelian Society 74 (2000), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamm, F. M. “Failures of Just War Theory: Terror, Harm, and Justice,” Ethics 114 (2004), 650–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamm, F. M. “Terror and Collateral Damage,” Journal of Ethics 9 (2005), 381–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamm, F. M. “Terrorism and Several Moral Distinctions,” Legal Theory 12 (2006), 19–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Robert.The Significance of Free Will (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Katz, Leo.Bad Acts and Guilty Minds: Conundrums of the Criminal Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Leo. “Before and After: Temporal Anomalies in Legal Doctrine,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151 (2003), 863–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Leo. “Choice, Consent, and Cycling: The Hidden Limitations of Consent,” Michigan Law Review 104 (2006), 627–670.Google Scholar
Katz, Leo.“Why the Law Is Either/Or,” working paper, on file with authors.
Kessler, Kimberly D. Comment, “The Role of Luck in the Criminal Law,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142 (1994), 2183–2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Robert E., and Sunstein, Cass R.. Essay, “Doing without Speed Limits,” Boston University Law Review 79 (1999), 155–194.Google Scholar
Knobe, Joshua, and Doris, John M.. “Strawsonian Variations: Folk Morality and the Search for a Unified Theory,” in The Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology (Doris, J. M. et al., eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming).
Kobrin, Joshua A. Note, “Betraying Honest Services: Theories of Trust and Betrayal Applied to the Mail Fraud Statute and § 1346,” New York University Annual Survey of American Law 61 (2006), 779–822.Google Scholar
Kugler, Itzhak.Direct and Oblique Intention in the Criminal Law: An Inquiry into Degrees of Blameworthiness (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002).Google Scholar
Lenman, James. “Compatibilism and Contractualism: The Possibility of Moral Responsibility,” Ethics 117 (2006), 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Ken. “The Solution to the Problem of Outcome Luck: Why Harm Is Just as Punishable as the Wrongful Action That Causes It,” Law & Philosophy 24 (2005), 263–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippke, Richard L. “No Easy Way Out: Dangerous Offenders and Preventive Detention,” Law & Philosophy 27 (2008), 383–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luban, David. “Contrived Ignorance,” Georgetown Law Journal 87 (1999), 957–980.Google Scholar
Luntley, Michael.Contemporary Philosophy of Thought: Truth, World, Content (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999).Google Scholar
McAdams, Richard H.“A Tempting State: The Political Economy of Entrapment,” Working Paper No. 33, Illinois Law and Economics (2005).
McMahan, Jeff. “The Basis of Moral Liability to Defensive Killing,” Philosophical Issues 15 (2005), 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. “The Ethics of Killing in War,” Ethics 114 (2004), 693–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, Jeff.The Ethics of Killing in War: The Oxford Uehiro Lectures, forthcoming, manuscript on file with authors.
McMahan, Jeff. “Self-Defense and Culpability,” Law & Philosophy 24 (2005), 751–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. “Self-Defense and the Problem of the Innocent Attacker,” Ethics 104 (1994), 252–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellow, David. “Iraq: A Morally Justified Resort to War,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2006), 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikhail, John.“Aspects of the Theory of Moral Cognition: Investigating Intuitive Knowledge of the Prohibition of Intentional Battery and the Principle of Double Effect,” Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper, Paper No. 762385 (2002), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=762385.
Michaels, Alan. “Acceptance: The Missing Mental State,” Southern California Law Review 71 (1998), 953–1036.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart.On Liberty (London: John W. Parker and Son, West Strand, 1859).Google Scholar
Mongin, Philippe. “Does Optimization Imply Rationality,” Synthese 124 (2000), 73–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montague, Phillip. “The Morality of Self-Defense: A Reply to Wasserman,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 18 (1989), 81–89.Google Scholar
Montmarquet, J. “Zimmerman on Culpable Ignorance,” Ethics 109 (1999), 842–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montmarquet, J.Monty Python and the Holy Grail (EMI Films, 1975).
Moore, Michael S.Act and Crime: The Philosophy of Action and Its Implications for Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S.Causation and Responsibility, forthcoming, manuscript on file with authors.
Moore, Michael S. “Causation and Responsibility,” Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (1999), 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Michael S.“Foreseeing Harm Opaquely,” in Action and Value in Criminal Law (Shute, S. et al., eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), 125–155.Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S.Law and Psychiatry: Rethinking the Relationship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S. “Patrolling the Consequentialist Borders of Our Obligations,” Law & Philosophy 27 (2008), 35–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Michael S.Placing Blame: A General Theory of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S. “Responsibility and the Unconscious,” Southern California Law Review 53 (1980), 1563–1678.Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S. “Thomson's Preliminaries about Causation and Rights,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 63 (1987), 497–522.Google Scholar
Moriarty, Jeffrey. “Ross on Desert and Punishment,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2006), 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. “Criminal Responsibility and the Disappearing Person,” Cardozo Law Review 28 (2006), 2545–2576.Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. “Culpability and Control,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142 (1994), 1587–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. “Diminished Rationality, Diminished Responsibility,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 1 (2003), 289–308.Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. “Equality and Individuation in Punishment,” Law & Philosophy, forthcoming.
Morse, Stephen J. “Neither Desert nor Disease,” Legal Theory 5 (1999), 265–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. “Rationality and Responsibility,” Southern California Law Review 74 (2000), 251–268.Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. “Reasons, Results, and Criminal Responsibility,” University of Illinois Law Review 2004), 363–444.
Morse, Stephen J. “Uncontrollable Urges and Irrational People,” Virginia Law Review 88 (2002), 1025–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark.Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natapoff, Alexandra. “Underenforcement,” Fordham Law Review 75 (2006), 1715–1776.Google Scholar
Norcross, Alastair. “Contractualism and Aggregation,” Social Theory & Practice 28 (2002), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norcross, Alastair. “Harming in Context,” Philosophical Studies 123 (2005), 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohana, Daniel. “Desert and Punishment for Acts Preparatory to the Commission of a Crime,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20 (2007), 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overland, Gerhard. “The Right to Do Wrong,” Law & Philosophy 26 (2007), 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendleton, Hibi. “A Critique of Rational Excuse Defense: A Reply to Finkelstein,” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 57 (1996), 651–676.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derek.Living without Free Will (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Stephen R.“Risk, Harm, and Responsibility,” in Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Owen, David G., ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), 321–346.Google Scholar
Pillsbury, Samuel H. “Crimes of Indifference,” Rutgers Law Review 49 (1996), 105–218.Google Scholar
Pillsbury, Samuel H.Judging Evil: Rethinking the Law of Murder and Manslaughter (New York: New York University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Pink, Thomas.The Psychology of Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, Bill. “Explaining Actions with Habits,” American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2006), 57–70.Google Scholar
Porat, Ariel.“Offsetting Risks,” Olin Working Paper No.316, University of Chicago Law and Economics (2007), available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=946764.
Portmore, Douglas. “Are Moral Reasons Morally Overriding?” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (2008), 369–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Warren.“Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect,” in Morality and Action (Quinn, W. and Foot, P., eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Richards, Janet.Human Nature after Darwin: A Philosophical Introduction (London: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph.The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph.Practical Reasons and Norms (London: Hutchinson, 1975).Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H. “The Bomb Thief and the Theory of Justification Defenses,” Criminal Law Forum 8 (1997), 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Paul H.Criminal Law Defenses, vol. 2 (St. Paul: West, 1984).Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H. “Dissenting View of Commissioner Paul H. Robinson to the Promulgation of Sentencing Guidelines by the United States Sentencing Commission,” Federal Register 52 (1987), 18121–18132.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H. “Prohibited Risks and Culpable Disregard or Inattentiveness: Challenge and Confusion in the Formulation of Risk-Creation Offenses,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 4 (2002), 367–396.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H. “Punishing Dangerousness: Cloaking Preventive Detention as Criminal Justice,” Harvard Law Review 114 (2001), 1429–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Paul H.Structure and Function in Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Paul H. “A Theory of Justification: Societal Harm as a Prerequisite for Criminal Liability,” UCLA Law Review 23 (1975), 266–292.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., and Michael T. Cahill. “The Accelerating Degradation of Criminal Codes,” Hastings Law Journal 56 (2005), 633–656.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., and Cahill, Michael T.. “Can a Model Penal Code Second Save the States from Themselves?” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 1 (2003), 169–178.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., and Cahill, Michael T.. Law without Justice: Why Criminal Law Doesn't Give People What They Deserve (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., Michael T. Cahill, and Usman Mohammad. “The Five Worst (and Five Best) American Criminal Codes,” Northwestern University Law Review 95 (2000), 1–90.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., and John M. Darley. “Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioural Science Investigation,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24 (2004), 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., and Darley, John M.. Justice, Liability and Blame: Community Views and the Criminal Law (Boulder: Westview Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., and Robert Kurzban. “Concordance and Conflict in Intuitions of Justice,” Minnesota Law Review 91 (2007), 1829–1907.Google Scholar
Rodin, David.War and Self-Defense (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Audrey. “New Technology, Old Defenses: Internet Sting Operations and Attempt Liability,” University of Richmond Law Review 38 (2004), 477–524.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. “Crystals and Mud in Property Law,” Stanford Law Review 40 (1988), 577–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Gideon. “Skepticism about Moral Responsibility,” Philosophical Perspectives 18 (Ethics) (2004), 295–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royzman, Edward, and Rahul, Kumar. “Is Consequential Luck Morally Inconsequential? Empirical Psychology and the Reassessment of Moral Luck,” Ratio 17 (2004), 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert.The Concept of Mind (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949).Google Scholar
Sartorio, Carolina. “Causes as Difference-Makers,” Philosophical Studies 123 (2005), 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartorio, Carolina. “Moral Inertia,” Philosophical Studies 140 (2008), 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. “The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules,” University of Chicago Law Review 56 (1989), 1175–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. “Replies,” Social Theory and Practice 28 (2002), 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer-Landau, Russ. “Retributivism and Desert,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 (2000), 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, Frederick.Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, and Richard, Zeckhauser. “Regulation by Generalization,” Working Paper No. 05–16, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies (2005), available at http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf/rwp/RWP05–048.
Schopp, Robert F.Automatism, Insanity, and the Psychology of Criminal Responsibility: A Philosophical Inquiry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J. “The Gender Question in Criminal Law,” Social Philosophy & Policy 7 (1990), 105–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, Steven. “Strict Liability versus Negligence,” Journal of Legal Studies 9 (1986), 1–26.Google Scholar
Shaw, Joseph. “Intention in Ethics,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (2006), 187–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Joseph. “Intentions and Trolleys,” Philosophical Quarterly 56 (2006), 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, George. “Out of Control,” Ethics 116 (2006), 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, David. “Moral Address, Moral Responsibility, and the Boundaries of the Moral Community,” Ethics 118 (2007), 70–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simester, A. P., and G. R. Sullivan. “On the Nature and Rationale of Property Offenses,” in Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special Part of the Criminal Law (Duff, R. A. and Green, Stuart, eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 168–195.Google Scholar
Simon, Rita J., and David E. Aaronson. The Insanity Defense: A Critical Assessment of the Law and Policy in the Post Hinckley Era (New York: Praeger, 1988).Google Scholar
Simons, Kenneth W. “Culpability and Retributive Theory: The Problem of Criminal Negligence,” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 5 (1994), 365–398.Google Scholar
Simons, Kenneth W. “Does Punishment for ‘Culpable Indifference’ Simply Punish for ‘Bad Character’? Examining the Requisite Connection between Mens Rea and Actus Reus,” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 6 (2002), 219–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, Kenneth W. “Rethinking Mental States,” Boston University Law Review 72 (1992), 463–554.Google Scholar
Simons, Kenneth W. “Tort Negligence, Cost-Benefit Analysis and Tradeoffs: A Closer Look at the Controversy,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, forthcoming.
Slobogin, Christopher.Minding Justice: Laws That Deprive People with Mental Disability of Life and Liberty (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Smilansky, Saul.Free Will and Illusion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Smith, Angela M. “Responsibility for Attitudes: Activity and Passivity in Mental Life,” Ethics 115 (2005), 236–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. C.Justification and Excuse in the Criminal Law (London: Stevens, 1989).Google Scholar
Steadman, Henry J., et al. Before and After Hinckley: Evaluating Insanity Defense Reform (New York: Guilford Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe. “Torture – The Case for Dirty Harry and against Alan Dershowitz,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2006), 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe. “Yet Another Revised DDE? A Note on David K. Chan's DDED,” Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 9 (2006), 231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Jim, and Robert, Goodman. “Association between Behavior at Age 3 Years and Adult Criminality,” British Journal of Psychiatry 179 (2001), 197–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strawson, Galen. “The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility,” Philosophical Studies 75 (1994), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Peter.“Freedom and Resentment,” in Free Will (Watson, Gary, ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982), 72–93.Google Scholar
Stuntz, William J. “The Pathological Politics of Criminal Law,” Michigan Law Review 100 (2001), 505–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuntz, William J. “Plea Bargaining and Criminal Law's Disappearing Shadow,” Harvard Law Review 117 (2004), 2548–2569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., and Adrian Vermeule. “Is Capital Punishment Morally Required? The Relevance of Life-Life Tradeoffs,” Stanford Law Review 58 (2005), 703–750.Google Scholar
Tadros, Victor.Criminal Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Tasioulas, John. “Punishment and Repentance,” Philosophy 81 (2006), 279–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis.“Self-Defense and Rights,” Lindley Lecture at the University of Kansas (April 5, 1976), reprinted in Judith Jarvis Thomson, Rights, Restitution, and Risk: Essays in Moral Theory (Parent, William, ed., Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986), 33–48.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. “Some Ruminations on Rights,” 19 Arizona Law Review 45 (1977).Google Scholar
Varzi, Achille C., and Giuliano Torrengo. “Crimes and Punishments,” Philosophia 34 (2006), 395–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vierkant, Tillman. “Owning Intentions and Moral Responsibility,” Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 8 (2005), 507–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vranas, Peter B. M. “I Ought, Therefore I Can,” Philosophical Studies 136 (2007), 167–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walen, Alec. “The Doctrine of Illicit Intentions,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 34 (2006), 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walen, Alec. “Permissibly Encouraging the Impermissible,” Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (2004), 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, R. Jay.Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Wasserstrom, Richard A. “H. L. A. Hart and the Doctrines of Mens Rea and Criminal Responsibility,” University of Chicago Law Review 35 (1967), 92–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westen, Peter. “An Attitudinal Theory of Excuse,” Law & Philosophy 25 (2006), 289–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westen, Peter. “Individualizing the Reasonable Person in Criminal Law,” Criminal Law & Philosophy 2 (2008), 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westen, Peter. “Two Rules of Legality in Criminal Law,” Law & Philosophy 26 (2007), 229–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westen, Peter. “Why Criminal Harm Matters: Plato's Abiding Insight in the Laws,” Criminal Law & Philosophy 1 (2007), 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Glanville Llewelyn.Criminal Law: The General Part (2d ed., London: Stevens, 1961).Google Scholar
Wright, Richard W. “Causation in Tort Law,” California Law Review 73 (1985), 1735–1828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaffe, Gideon.“Trying, Acting and Attempted Crimes,” unpublished manuscript, on file with the authors.
Zaibert, Leo.Punishment and Retribution (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Michael J. “Moral Luck: A Partial Map,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (2006), 585–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Michael J. “Moral Responsibility and Ignorance,” Ethics 107 (1997), 410–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohar, Noam J. “Innocence and Complex Threats: Upholding the War Effort and the Condemnation of Terrorism,” Ethics 114 (2004), 734–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×