Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Crime and Culpability
  • Cited by 113
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
June 2012
Print publication year:
2009
Online ISBN:
9780511804595
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804595
Subjects:
Law: General Interest, Legal Philosophy, Philosophy
Series:
Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy and Law
Information

Book description

This book presents a comprehensive overview of what the criminal law would look like if organised around the principle that those who deserve punishment should receive punishment commensurate with, but no greater than, that which they deserve. Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan argue that desert is a function of the actor's culpability, and that culpability is a function of the risks of harm to protected interests that the actor believes he is imposing and his reasons for acting in the face of those risks. The authors deny that resultant harms, as well as unperceived risks, affect the actor's desert. They thus reject punishment for inadvertent negligence as well as for intentions or preparatory acts that are not risky. Alexander and Ferzan discuss the reasons for imposing risks that negate or mitigate culpability, the individuation of crimes, and omissions.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References
Bibliography
Primary Materials
Annotated Code of Maryland, Criminal Law (2007).
Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).
Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (West 1998).
Arizona v. Henley, 687 P. 2d 1220 (Ariz. 1984).
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002).
Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002).
Baltimore & O.R.R. v. Goodman, 275 U.S. 66 (1927).
Berry v. Sugar Notch Borough, 43 A. 240 (Pa. 1899).
Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004).
Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932).
Brown v. Indiana, 830 N.E.2d 956 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005).
California v. Hamilton, 47 Cal. Rptr. 2d 343 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995).
Code of Alabama (West 1975).
Code of Georgia Annotated (2007).
Connecticut General Statutes Annotated (2007).
California Penal Code (West 1999).
City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999).
Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland v. Maxwell, (1978) 3 All E.R. 1140.
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 579 (1965).
Hawaii Revised Statutes (2006).
Illinois v. Wicks, 823 N.E.2d 1153 (Ill. Ct. App. 2005).
In re Steven S., 31 Cal. Rptr. 644 (1994).
Kansas v. Harris, 162 P. 3d 28 (Kan. 2007).
Kansas v. Neal, 120 P. 3d 366 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005).
Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 (1982).
Ladner v. United States, 358 U.S. 169 (1958).
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
Martin v. Ohio, 480 U.S. 228 (1987).
Maryland Code Annotated (2007).
Mattingly v. United States, 924 F.2d 785 (8th Cir. 1991).
Michigan Compiled Laws Annotated (2007).
Missouri Revised Statutes (2007).
Missouri v. Hunter, 459 U.S. 359 (1983).
Model Penal Code (Official Draft and Revised Comments) (1985).
New Jersey Statutes Annotated (West 2007).
New York Education Law (2001)
New York Penal Law (McKinney1999).
New York Penal Law (2003).
New York Penal Law (2007).
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company, 162 N.E. 99 (N.Y. 1928).
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes Annotated (West 2003).
People v. Anderson, 447 P. 2d 942 (1968).
People v. Decina, 138 N.E.2d 799 (N.Y. 1956).
People v. Dlugash, 363 N.E.2d 1155 (N.Y. 1977).
People v. Luparello, 231 Cal. Rptr. 832 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986).
People v. Myers, 426 N.E.2d 535 (Ill. 1981).
People v. Myers, 816 N.E.2d 820 (Ill. Ct. App. 2004).
People v. Payne, 819 N.E.2d 634 (N.Y. 2004);
People v. Rizzo, 158 N.E. 888, 889 (N.Y. 1927).
People v. Suarez, 844 N.E.2d 721 (N.Y. 2005).
Pokora v. Wabash Ry. Co., 292 U.S. 98 (1934).
Regina v. Smith (David), (1974) 2 Q.B. 354.
Restatement (Third) of Torts: Liability for Physical Harm (Proposed Final Draft No. 1, 2005).
Sanchez-Rengifo v. United States, 815 A.2d 351 (D.C. Ct. App. 2002).
Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510 (1979).
Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 607 P. 2d 924 (Cal. 1980).
Smith v. United States, 295 A.2d 60 (D.C. Ct. App. 1972).
State v. LaFreniere, 481 N.W.2d 412 (Neb. 1992).
State v. Stanko, 974 P. 2d 1132 (Mont. 1998).
State v. Williams, 484 P. 2d 1167 (Wash. Ct. App. 1971).
Stephenson v. State, 179 N.E. 633 (Ind. 1932).
Summers v. Tice, 199 P. 2d 1 (Cal. 1948) (en banc).
Terry v. Ohio, 393 U.S. 1 (1968).
Texas Penal Code Annotated (2007).
Thabo Meli v. Regina, (1954) 1 All E.R. 373.
United States Code, title 18, § 1346 (2000).
United States Constitution, Amendment V.
United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2005).
United States v. Bergman, 416 F. Supp. 496 (S.D.N.Y. 1976).
United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).
United States v. Brumley, 116 F.3d 728 (5th Cir. 1997).
United States v. Carroll Towing Co., 159 F.2d. 169 (2d Cir. 1947).
United States v. Czubinski, 106 F.3d 1069 (1st Cir. 1997).
United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688 (1993).
United States v. Incorporated Village of Island Park, 888 F. Supp. 419 (E.D.N.Y. 1995).
United States v. Jewell, 532 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1976).
United States v. Johnson, 964 F.2d 124 (1992).
United States v. Mancuso, 42 F.3d 836 (4th Cir. 1994).
United States v. Oviedo, 525 F.2d 881 (5th Cir. 1976).
United States v. Ragen, 314 U.S. 513 (1942).
United States v. Sawyer, 239 F.3d 31 (1st Cir. 2001).
United States v. Whittington, 26 F.3d 456 (4th Cir. 1994).
Village of Sugar Grove v. Rich, 808 N.E.2d 525 (Ill. Ct. App. 2004).
Washington v. Soonalole, 992 P. 2d 541 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000).
Wisconsin v. Rabe, 291 N.W.2d 809 (Wis. 1980).
Secondary Materials
Alexander, Larry. “A Unified Excuse of Preemptive Self-Protection,” Notre Dame Law Review 74 (1999), 1475–1506.
Alexander, Larry. “Consent, Punishment, and Proportionality,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 15 (1986), 178–182.
Alexander, Larry. “Crime and Culpability,” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 5 (1994), 1–30.
Alexander, Larry.“Criminal Liability for Omissions: An Inventory of Issues,” in Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (Shute, S. and Simester, A. P., eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 121–142.
Alexander, Larry. “Deontology at the Threshold,” San Diego Law Review 37 (2000), 893–912.
Alexander, Larry. “The Doomsday Machine: Proportionality, Prevention, and Punishment,” Monist 63 (1980), 199–227.
Alexander, Larry. “Equal Protection and the Prosecution and Conviction of Crime,” University of Chicago Legal Forum (2002), 155–162.
Alexander, Larry. “Foreword: Coleman and Corrective Justice,” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 15 (1992), 621–636.
Alexander, Larry. “Harm, Offense and Morality,” 7 Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 199 (1994).
Alexander, Larry. “Inculpatory and Exculpatory Mistakes and the Fact/Law Distinction: An Essay in Memory of Myke Bayles,” Law & Philosophy 12 (1993), 33–70.
Alexander, Larry. “Insufficient Concern: A Unified Conception of Criminal Culpability,” California Law Review 88 (2000), 931–954.
Alexander, Larry. “Lesser Evils: A Closer Look at the Paradigmatic Justification,” Law & Philosophy 24 (2005), 611–644.
Alexander, Larry. “The Moral Magic of Consent (II),” Legal Theory 2 (1996), 165–174.
Alexander, Larry.“The Philosophy of Criminal Law,” in The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy (Coleman, Jules and Shapiro, Scott, eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 815–867.
Alexander, Larry. “Reconsidering the Relationship among Voluntary Acts, Strict Liability, and Negligence in Criminal Law,” Social Philosophy & Policy 7 (1990), 84–104.
Alexander, Larry. “Scalar Properties, Binary Judgments,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2008), 85–104.
Alexander, Larry. “Unknowingly Justified Actors and the Attempt/Success Distinction,” Tulsa Law Review 39 (2004), 851–860.
Alexander, Larry, and Kimberly, Kessler Ferzan. “Culpable Acts of Risk Creation,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 5 (2008), 375–405.
Alexander, Larry, and Kimberly, D. Kessler. “Mens Rea and Inchoate Crimes,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 87 (1997), 1138–1193.
Alexander, Larry, and Michael, S. Moore. “Deontological Ethics,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (November 21, 2007), available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-deontological/.
Alexander, Larry, and Emily, Sherwin. “The Deceptive Nature of Rules,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142 (1994), 1191–1227.
Alexander, Larry, and Emily, Sherwin. The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules and the Dilemmas of Law (Durham: Duke University Press, 2001).
Arenella, Peter. “Convicting the Morally Blameless: Reassessing the Relationship between Legal and Moral Accountability,” UCLA Law Review 39 (1992), 1511–1623.
Arneson, Richard J. “Just Warfare Theory and Noncombatant Immunity,” Cornell International Law Journal 39 (2006), 663–688.
Ashworth, Andrew. “The Doctrine of Provocation,” Cambridge Law Journal 35 (1976), 292–320.
Baker, Brenda M. “Mens Rea, Negligence, and Criminal Law Reform,” Law & Philosophy 6 (1987), 53–88.
Barkow, Rachel E. “Recharging the Jury: The Criminal Jury's Constitutional Role in an Era of Mandatory Sentencing,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 152 (2003), 33–128.
Bayles, Michael D.Principles of Law: A Normative Analysis (Dordrecht: D. Reidel; Norwell: sold and distributed in the U.S.A. and Canada by Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1987).
Beauchamp, Tom L.“Who Deserves Autonomy, and Whose Autonomy Deserves Respect?” in Personal Autonomy: New Essays in Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy (Taylor, J. S. ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 310–329.
Benbaji, Yitzhak. “Culpable Bystanders, Innocent Threats and the Ethics of Self-Defense,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (2005), 585–622.
Bentham, Jeremy.Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1781; Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1988).
Bergelson, Vera. “The Right to Be Hurt: Testing the Boundaries of Consent,” George Washington Law Review 75 (2007), 165–236.
Bergelson, Vera. “Victims and Perpetrators: An Argument for Comparative Liability in Criminal Law,” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 8 (2005), 385–488.
Berman, Mitchell N. “Justification and Excuse, Law and Morality,” Duke Law Journal 53 (2003), 1–78.
Berman, Mitchell N. “Lesser Evils and Justification: A Less Close Look,” Law and Philosophy 24 (2005), 681–709.
Berman, Mitchell N.“Punishment and Justification,” working paper (December 15, 2006), available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=956610.
Bierschbach, Richard A., and Alex Stein. “Mediating Rules in Criminal Law,” Virginia Law Review 93 (2007), 1197–1258.
Bok, Hilary.Freedom and Responsibility (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).
Brady, James. “Punishment for Negligence: A Reply to Professor Hall,” Buffalo Law Review 22 (1972), 107–122.
Bratman, Michael.Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987).
Brown, Darryl K. “Plain Meaning, Practical Reason, and Culpability: Toward a Theory of Jury Interpretation of Criminal Statutes,” Michigan Law Review 96 (1998), 1199–1268.
Byrd, B. Sharon. “Wrongdoing and Attribution: Implications beyond the Justification-Excuse Distinction,” Wayne Law Review 33 (1987), 1289–1342.
Cahill, Michael T. “Punishment Decisions at Conviction: Recognizing the Jury as Fault-Finder,” University of Chicago Legal Forum (2005), 91–148.
Cahill, Michael T. “Retributive Justice in the Real World,” Legal Studies Paper No. 77, Brooklyn Law School (2007), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=996140.
Calabresi, Guido, and Phillip, Bobbitt. Tragic Choices (New York: Norton, 1978).
Cardozo, Benjamin.What Medicine Can Do for Law (1930; Clark: Lawbook Exchange, 2005).
Cavanaugh, T. A.Double-Effect Reasoning: Doing Good and Avoiding Evil (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006).
Christopher, Russell L. “The Prosecutor's Dilemma: Bargains and Punishments,” Fordham Law Review 72 (2003), 93–168.
Conlisk, John. “Why Bounded Rationality,” Journal of Economic Literature 34 (1996), 669–700.
Dan-Cohen, Meir. “Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law,” Harvard Law Review 97 (1984), 625–677.
Davidson, Donald.Essays on Actions and Events (2d ed., Oxford: Clarendon, 2001).
Delaney, Neil Francis. “A Note on Intention and the Doctrine of Double Effect,” Philosophical Studies 134 (2007), 103–110.
Delaney, Neil Francis. “Two Cheers for ‘Closeness’: Terror, Targeting and Double Effect,” Philosophical Studies 137 (2008), 335–367.
Dennett, Daniel Clement.Content and Consciousness (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; New York, Humanities Press, 1969).
Dennett, Daniel Clement.Freedom Evolves (New York: Viking, 2003).
Domsky, Darren. “There Is No Door: Finally Solving the Problem of Moral Luck,” Journal of Philosophy 101 (2004), 445–464.
Domsky, Darren. “Double Jeopardy,” Georgetown Law Journal Annual Review of Criminal Procedure 35 (2006), 422–464.
Dressler, Joshua. “Battered Women Who Kill Their Sleeping Tormenters: Reflections on Maintaining Respect for Human Life While Killing Moral Monsters,” in Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (Shute, Stephen and Simester, A. P., eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 259–282.
Dressler, Joshua. “Does One Size Fit All? Thoughts on Alexander's Unified Conception of Criminal Culpability,” California Law Review 88 (2000), 955–964.
Dressler, Joshua. “Justifications and Excuses: A Brief Review of the Concepts and the Literature,” Wayne Law Review 33 (1987), 1155–1176.
Dressler, Joshua.Understanding Criminal Law (4th ed., New York: Lexis, 2006).
Dressler, Joshua. “Why Keep the Provocation Defense?: Some Reflections on a Difficult Subject,” Minnesota Law Review 86 (2002), 959–1002.
Dubber, Marcus Dirk. “Toward a Constitutional Law of Crime and Punishment,” Hastings Law Journal 55 (2004), 509–572.
Duff, R. A.Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in Criminal Law (Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart, (2007).
Duff, R. A. “Crime, Prohibition, and Punishment,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2002), 97–108.
Duff, R. A. “Criminalizing Endangerment,” Louisiana Law Review 65 (2005), 941–967.
Duff, R. A. “'I Might Be Guilty, But You Can't Try Me': Estoppel and Other Bars to Trial,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 1 (2003), 245–260.
Duff, R. A.Intention, Agency, and Criminal Liability: Philosophy of Action and the Criminal Law (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).
Duff, R. A. “Rethinking Justifications,” Tulsa Law Review 39 (2004), 829–850.
Dworkin, Gerald, and David, Blumenfeld. “Punishment for Intentions,” Mind 75 (1966), 396–404.
Edmundson, William. “Morality without Responsibility,” manuscript on submission (2007), on file with author, University of San Diego School of Law.
Eisikovits, Nir. “Moral Luck and the Criminal Law,” in Law and Social Justice (Campbell, J. K., O'Rourke, M., and Shier, D., eds., Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2005), 105–124.
Enoch, David. “Ends, Means, Side-Effects, and Beyond: A Comment on the Justification of the Use of Force,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 7 (2005), 43–59.
Estrich, Susan.Real Rape (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987).
Ezorsky, Gertrude. “The Ethics of Punishment,” in Philosophical Perspectives on Punishment (Ezorsky, G., ed., Albany: State University of New York Press, 1972), xi–xxvi.
Fabre, Cecile.Whose Body Is It Anyway?: Justice and the Integrity of the Person (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).
Feinberg, Joel.Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970).
Feinberg, Joel.Harm to Others (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984).
Feinberg, Joel.Harm to Self (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).
Feinberg, Joel.Harmless Wrongdoing (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).
Feinberg, Joel.Offense to Others (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985).
Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. “Act, Agency, and Indifference: The Foundations of Criminal Responsibility,” New Criminal Law Review 10 (2007), 441–457.
Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. “Beyond Intention,” Cardozo Law Review 29 (2008), 1147–1167.
Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. “Clarifying Consent: Peter Westen's The Logic of Consent,” Law & Philosophy 25 (2006), 193–217.
Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. “Defending Imminence: From Battered Women to Iraq,” Arizona Law Review 46 (2004), 213–262.
Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. “Don't Abandon the Model Penal Code Yet! Thinking Through Simons's Rethinking,” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 6 (2002), 185–218.
Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. “Holistic Culpability,” Cardozo Law Review 28 (2007), 2523–2544.
Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. “Justifying Self-Defense,” Law & Philosophy 24 (2005), 711–749.
Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler. “Opaque Recklessness,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 91 (2001), 597–652.
Finkelstein, Claire O. “Excuses and Dispositions in Criminal Law,” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 6 (2002), 317–360.
Finkelstein, Claire O. “Self-Defense as Rational Excuse,” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 57 (1996), 621–650.
Fischer, John Martin. “'Punishment and Desert: A Reply to Dolinko,” Ethics 117 (2006), 109–118.
Fischer, John Martin. “Recent Work on Moral Responsibility,” Ethics 110 (1999), 93–139.
Fitzpatrick, William J. “The Intend/Foresee Distinction and the Problem of ‘Closeness,’ ” Philosophical Studies 128 (2006), 585–617.
Fletcher, George P.The Grammar of Criminal Law: American, Comparative, and International, vol. 1: Foundations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).
Fletcher, George P.“The Nature of Justification,” in Action and Value in Criminal Law (Shute, Stephen et al., eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), 175–186.
Fletcher, George P.Rethinking Criminal Law (Boston: Little, Brown, 1978).
Fletcher, George P. “The Right Deed for the Wrong Reason: A Reply to Mr. Robinson,” UCLA Law Review 23 (1975), 293–322.
Fletcher, George P. “Should Intolerable Prison Conditions Generate a Justification or an Excuse for Escape?” UCLA Law Review 26 (1979), 1355–1369.
Fletcher, George P.Structure and Function in Criminal Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).
Fletcher, George P. “The Theory of Criminal Negligence: A Comparative Analysis,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 119 (1971), 401–438.
Fodor, Jerry.Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987).
Fuller, Lon L. “The Case of the Speluncean Explorers,” Harvard Law Review 62 (1949), 616–645.
Gardner, J. “The Gist of Excuses,” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 1 (1998), 575–598.
Gardner, J., and S. Shute. “The Wrongness of Rape,” in Oxford Essays on Jurisprudence (4th ser., Horder, J., ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 193–218.
Garvey, Stephen P. “Passion's Puzzle,” Iowa Law Review 90 (2005), 1677–1746.
Garvey, Stephen P. “Self-Defense and the Mistaken Racist,” New Criminal Law Review 11 (2008), 119–171.
Garvey, Stephen P. “What's Wrong with Involuntary Manslaughter?” Texas Law Review 85 (2006), 333–384.
Goldman, Alvin I.A Theory of Human Action (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970).
Goodin, Robert E., and Frank Jackson. “Freedom from Fear,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 35 (2007), 249–265.
Greco, John. “Virtue, Luck and the Pyrrhonian Problematic,” Philosophical Studies 130 (2006), 9–34.
Green, Stuart.Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White-Collar Crime (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).
Guttenplan, Samuel D.A Companion to Philosophy of Mind (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994).
Haji, Ishtiyaque. “An Epistemic Dimension of Blameworthiness,” Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 57 (1997), 523–544.
Hall, Jerome. “Negligent Behavior Should Be Excluded from Penal Liability,” Columbia Law Review 63 (1963), 632–644.
Halpin, Andrew.Definition in the Criminal Law (Oxford: Hart, 2004).
Harcourt, Bernard E. “The Collapse of the Harm Principle,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 90 (1999), 109–194.
Hart, H. L. A.Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 1968).
Haworth, Lawrence.Autonomy: An Essay in Philosophical Psychology and Ethics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986).
Hieronymi, Pamela. “Responsibility for Believing,” Synthese 16 (2008), 357–373.
Hodgson, David. “Responsibility and Good Reasons,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 2 (2005), 471–484.
Holmes, Oliver Wendell.The Common Law (London: Macmillan, 1881).
Horn, Mike. Note, “A Rude Awakening: What to Do with the Sleepwalking Defense?” Boston College Law Review 46 (2004), 149–182.
Huigens, Kyron.“Is Strict Liability Rape Defensible?” in Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special Part of the Criminal Law (Duff, R. A. and Green, Stuart P., eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 196–217.
Hurd, Heidi M. “Challenging Authority,” Yale Law Journal 100 (1991), 1611–1678.
Hurd, Heidi M. “Justification and Excuse, Wrongdoing and Culpability,” Notre Dame Law Review 74 (1999), 1551–1574.
Hurley, Paul E. “Does Consequentialism Make Too Many Demands, or None at All?” Ethics 116 (2006), 680–706.
Husak, Douglas N. “Already Punished Enough,” Philosophical Topics 19 (1990), 79–99.
Husak, Douglas N. “Crimes outside the Core,” Tulsa Law Review 39 (2004), 755–780.
Husak, Douglas N. “Guns and Drugs: Case Studies on the Principles Limits of the Criminal Sanction,” Law & Philosophy 23 (2004), 437–493.
Husak, Douglas N. “Justifications and the Criminal Liability of Accessories,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 80 (1989), 491–520.
Husak, Douglas N.Legalize This! The Case for Decriminalizing Drugs (London: Verso, 2002).
Husak, Douglas N.Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).
Husak, Douglas N. “Rethinking the Act Requirement,” Cardozo Law Review 28 (2007), 2437–2460.
Husak, Douglas N. “The Sequential Principle of Relative Culpability,” Legal Theory 1 (1995), 493–518.
Husak, Douglas N., and Callender, Craig A.. “Willful Ignorance, Knowledge, and the ‘Equal Culpability’ Thesis: A Study of the Deeper Significance of the Principle of Legality,” Wisconsin Law Review (1994), 29–70.
Hyman, David A. “Rescue without Law: An Empirical Perspective on the Duty to Rescue,” Texas Law Review 84 (2006), 653–738.
Jeffries, John Calvin, Jr. “Legality, Vagueness, and the Construction of Penal Statutes,” Virginia Law Review 71 (1985), 189–246.
Kadish, Sanford H. “Reckless Complicity,” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 87 (1997), 369–394.
Kadish, Sanford H. “Respect for Life and Regard for Rights in the Criminal Law,” California Law Review 64 (1976), 871–901.
Kadish, Sanford H., and Schulhofer, Stephen J., eds. Criminal Law and Its Processes: Cases and Materials (7th ed., Boston: Little, Brown, 2001).
Kahan, Dan, and Nussbaum, Martha C.. “Two Conceptions of Emotion in Criminal Law,” Columbia Law Review 96 (1996), 269–374.
Kamm, F. M. “The Doctrine of Triple Effect,” Aristotelian Society 74 (2000), 21–39.
Kamm, F. M. “Failures of Just War Theory: Terror, Harm, and Justice,” Ethics 114 (2004), 650–692.
Kamm, F. M. “Terror and Collateral Damage,” Journal of Ethics 9 (2005), 381–401.
Kamm, F. M. “Terrorism and Several Moral Distinctions,” Legal Theory 12 (2006), 19–69.
Kane, Robert.The Significance of Free Will (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Katz, Leo.Bad Acts and Guilty Minds: Conundrums of the Criminal Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).
Katz, Leo. “Before and After: Temporal Anomalies in Legal Doctrine,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151 (2003), 863–886.
Katz, Leo. “Choice, Consent, and Cycling: The Hidden Limitations of Consent,” Michigan Law Review 104 (2006), 627–670.
Katz, Leo.“Why the Law Is Either/Or,” working paper, on file with authors.
Kessler, Kimberly D. Comment, “The Role of Luck in the Criminal Law,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142 (1994), 2183–2237.
King, Robert E., and Sunstein, Cass R.. Essay, “Doing without Speed Limits,” Boston University Law Review 79 (1999), 155–194.
Knobe, Joshua, and Doris, John M.. “Strawsonian Variations: Folk Morality and the Search for a Unified Theory,” in The Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology (Doris, J. M. et al., eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming).
Kobrin, Joshua A. Note, “Betraying Honest Services: Theories of Trust and Betrayal Applied to the Mail Fraud Statute and § 1346,” New York University Annual Survey of American Law 61 (2006), 779–822.
Kugler, Itzhak.Direct and Oblique Intention in the Criminal Law: An Inquiry into Degrees of Blameworthiness (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002).
Lenman, James. “Compatibilism and Contractualism: The Possibility of Moral Responsibility,” Ethics 117 (2006), 7–31.
Levy, Ken. “The Solution to the Problem of Outcome Luck: Why Harm Is Just as Punishable as the Wrongful Action That Causes It,” Law & Philosophy 24 (2005), 263–303.
Lippke, Richard L. “No Easy Way Out: Dangerous Offenders and Preventive Detention,” Law & Philosophy 27 (2008), 383–414.
Luban, David. “Contrived Ignorance,” Georgetown Law Journal 87 (1999), 957–980.
Luntley, Michael.Contemporary Philosophy of Thought: Truth, World, Content (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999).
McAdams, Richard H.“A Tempting State: The Political Economy of Entrapment,” Working Paper No. 33, Illinois Law and Economics (2005).
McMahan, Jeff. “The Basis of Moral Liability to Defensive Killing,” Philosophical Issues 15 (2005), 386–405.
McMahan, Jeff. “The Ethics of Killing in War,” Ethics 114 (2004), 693–733.
McMahan, Jeff.The Ethics of Killing in War: The Oxford Uehiro Lectures, forthcoming, manuscript on file with authors.
McMahan, Jeff. “Self-Defense and Culpability,” Law & Philosophy 24 (2005), 751–774.
McMahan, Jeff. “Self-Defense and the Problem of the Innocent Attacker,” Ethics 104 (1994), 252–290.
Mellow, David. “Iraq: A Morally Justified Resort to War,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2006), 293–310.
Mikhail, John.“Aspects of the Theory of Moral Cognition: Investigating Intuitive Knowledge of the Prohibition of Intentional Battery and the Principle of Double Effect,” Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper, Paper No. 762385 (2002), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=762385.
Michaels, Alan. “Acceptance: The Missing Mental State,” Southern California Law Review 71 (1998), 953–1036.
Mill, John Stuart.On Liberty (London: John W. Parker and Son, West Strand, 1859).
Mongin, Philippe. “Does Optimization Imply Rationality,” Synthese 124 (2000), 73–111.
Montague, Phillip. “The Morality of Self-Defense: A Reply to Wasserman,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 18 (1989), 81–89.
Montmarquet, J. “Zimmerman on Culpable Ignorance,” Ethics 109 (1999), 842–845.
Montmarquet, J.Monty Python and the Holy Grail (EMI Films, 1975).
Moore, Michael S.Act and Crime: The Philosophy of Action and Its Implications for Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).
Moore, Michael S.Causation and Responsibility, forthcoming, manuscript on file with authors.
Moore, Michael S. “Causation and Responsibility,” Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (1999), 1–51.
Moore, Michael S.“Foreseeing Harm Opaquely,” in Action and Value in Criminal Law (Shute, S. et al., eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), 125–155.
Moore, Michael S.Law and Psychiatry: Rethinking the Relationship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).
Moore, Michael S. “Patrolling the Consequentialist Borders of Our Obligations,” Law & Philosophy 27 (2008), 35–96.
Moore, Michael S.Placing Blame: A General Theory of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).
Moore, Michael S. “Responsibility and the Unconscious,” Southern California Law Review 53 (1980), 1563–1678.
Moore, Michael S. “Thomson's Preliminaries about Causation and Rights,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 63 (1987), 497–522.
Moriarty, Jeffrey. “Ross on Desert and Punishment,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2006), 231–244.
Morse, Stephen J. “Criminal Responsibility and the Disappearing Person,” Cardozo Law Review 28 (2006), 2545–2576.
Morse, Stephen J. “Culpability and Control,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 142 (1994), 1587–1660.
Morse, Stephen J. “Diminished Rationality, Diminished Responsibility,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 1 (2003), 289–308.
Morse, Stephen J. “Equality and Individuation in Punishment,” Law & Philosophy, forthcoming.
Morse, Stephen J. “Neither Desert nor Disease,” Legal Theory 5 (1999), 265–309.
Morse, Stephen J. “Rationality and Responsibility,” Southern California Law Review 74 (2000), 251–268.
Morse, Stephen J. “Reasons, Results, and Criminal Responsibility,” University of Illinois Law Review 2004), 363–444.
Morse, Stephen J. “Uncontrollable Urges and Irrational People,” Virginia Law Review 88 (2002), 1025–1078.
Murphy, Mark.Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Natapoff, Alexandra. “Underenforcement,” Fordham Law Review 75 (2006), 1715–1776.
Norcross, Alastair. “Contractualism and Aggregation,” Social Theory & Practice 28 (2002), 303–314.
Norcross, Alastair. “Harming in Context,” Philosophical Studies 123 (2005), 149–173.
Ohana, Daniel. “Desert and Punishment for Acts Preparatory to the Commission of a Crime,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20 (2007), 113–142.
Overland, Gerhard. “The Right to Do Wrong,” Law & Philosophy 26 (2007), 377–404.
Pendleton, Hibi. “A Critique of Rational Excuse Defense: A Reply to Finkelstein,” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 57 (1996), 651–676.
Pereboom, Derek.Living without Free Will (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).
Perry, Stephen R.“Risk, Harm, and Responsibility,” in Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Owen, David G., ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), 321–346.
Pillsbury, Samuel H. “Crimes of Indifference,” Rutgers Law Review 49 (1996), 105–218.
Pillsbury, Samuel H.Judging Evil: Rethinking the Law of Murder and Manslaughter (New York: New York University Press, 1998).
Pink, Thomas.The Psychology of Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
Pollard, Bill. “Explaining Actions with Habits,” American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2006), 57–70.
Porat, Ariel.“Offsetting Risks,” Olin Working Paper No.316, University of Chicago Law and Economics (2007), available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=946764.
Portmore, Douglas. “Are Moral Reasons Morally Overriding?” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (2008), 369–388.
Quinn, Warren.“Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect,” in Morality and Action (Quinn, W. and Foot, P., eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 175–193.
Radcliffe-Richards, Janet.Human Nature after Darwin: A Philosophical Introduction (London: Routledge, 2000).
Raz, Joseph.The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979).
Raz, Joseph.Practical Reasons and Norms (London: Hutchinson, 1975).
Robinson, Paul H. “The Bomb Thief and the Theory of Justification Defenses,” Criminal Law Forum 8 (1997), 387–409.
Robinson, Paul H.Criminal Law Defenses, vol. 2 (St. Paul: West, 1984).
Robinson, Paul H. “Dissenting View of Commissioner Paul H. Robinson to the Promulgation of Sentencing Guidelines by the United States Sentencing Commission,” Federal Register 52 (1987), 18121–18132.
Robinson, Paul H. “Prohibited Risks and Culpable Disregard or Inattentiveness: Challenge and Confusion in the Formulation of Risk-Creation Offenses,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 4 (2002), 367–396.
Robinson, Paul H. “Punishing Dangerousness: Cloaking Preventive Detention as Criminal Justice,” Harvard Law Review 114 (2001), 1429–1456.
Robinson, Paul H.Structure and Function in Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).
Robinson, Paul H. “A Theory of Justification: Societal Harm as a Prerequisite for Criminal Liability,” UCLA Law Review 23 (1975), 266–292.
Robinson, Paul H., and Michael T. Cahill. “The Accelerating Degradation of Criminal Codes,” Hastings Law Journal 56 (2005), 633–656.
Robinson, Paul H., and Cahill, Michael T.. “Can a Model Penal Code Second Save the States from Themselves?” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 1 (2003), 169–178.
Robinson, Paul H., and Cahill, Michael T.. Law without Justice: Why Criminal Law Doesn't Give People What They Deserve (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).
Robinson, Paul H., Michael T. Cahill, and Usman Mohammad. “The Five Worst (and Five Best) American Criminal Codes,” Northwestern University Law Review 95 (2000), 1–90.
Robinson, Paul H., and John M. Darley. “Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioural Science Investigation,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24 (2004), 173–205.
Robinson, Paul H., and Darley, John M.. Justice, Liability and Blame: Community Views and the Criminal Law (Boulder: Westview Press, 1995).
Robinson, Paul H., and Robert Kurzban. “Concordance and Conflict in Intuitions of Justice,” Minnesota Law Review 91 (2007), 1829–1907.
Rodin, David.War and Self-Defense (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Rogers, Audrey. “New Technology, Old Defenses: Internet Sting Operations and Attempt Liability,” University of Richmond Law Review 38 (2004), 477–524.
Rose, Carol M. “Crystals and Mud in Property Law,” Stanford Law Review 40 (1988), 577–610.
Rosen, Gideon. “Skepticism about Moral Responsibility,” Philosophical Perspectives 18 (Ethics) (2004), 295–313.
Royzman, Edward, and Rahul, Kumar. “Is Consequential Luck Morally Inconsequential? Empirical Psychology and the Reassessment of Moral Luck,” Ratio 17 (2004), 329–344.
Ryle, Gilbert.The Concept of Mind (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949).
Sartorio, Carolina. “Causes as Difference-Makers,” Philosophical Studies 123 (2005), 71–96.
Sartorio, Carolina. “Moral Inertia,” Philosophical Studies 140 (2008), 117–133.
Scalia, Antonin. “The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules,” University of Chicago Law Review 56 (1989), 1175–1188.
Scanlon, Thomas. “Replies,” Social Theory and Practice 28 (2002), 337–358.
Schafer-Landau, Russ. “Retributivism and Desert,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 (2000), 189–214.
Schauer, Frederick.Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).
Schauer, Frederick, and Richard, Zeckhauser. “Regulation by Generalization,” Working Paper No. 05–16, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies (2005), available at http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf/rwp/RWP05–048.
Schopp, Robert F.Automatism, Insanity, and the Psychology of Criminal Responsibility: A Philosophical Inquiry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1991).
Schulhofer, Stephen J. “The Gender Question in Criminal Law,” Social Philosophy & Policy 7 (1990), 105–137.
Shavell, Steven. “Strict Liability versus Negligence,” Journal of Legal Studies 9 (1986), 1–26.
Shaw, Joseph. “Intention in Ethics,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (2006), 187–223.
Shaw, Joseph. “Intentions and Trolleys,” Philosophical Quarterly 56 (2006), 63–83.
Sher, George. “Out of Control,” Ethics 116 (2006), 285–301.
Shoemaker, David. “Moral Address, Moral Responsibility, and the Boundaries of the Moral Community,” Ethics 118 (2007), 70–108.
Simester, A. P., and G. R. Sullivan. “On the Nature and Rationale of Property Offenses,” in Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special Part of the Criminal Law (Duff, R. A. and Green, Stuart, eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 168–195.
Simon, Rita J., and David E. Aaronson. The Insanity Defense: A Critical Assessment of the Law and Policy in the Post Hinckley Era (New York: Praeger, 1988).
Simons, Kenneth W. “Culpability and Retributive Theory: The Problem of Criminal Negligence,” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 5 (1994), 365–398.
Simons, Kenneth W. “Does Punishment for ‘Culpable Indifference’ Simply Punish for ‘Bad Character’? Examining the Requisite Connection between Mens Rea and Actus Reus,” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 6 (2002), 219–316.
Simons, Kenneth W. “Rethinking Mental States,” Boston University Law Review 72 (1992), 463–554.
Simons, Kenneth W. “Tort Negligence, Cost-Benefit Analysis and Tradeoffs: A Closer Look at the Controversy,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, forthcoming.
Slobogin, Christopher.Minding Justice: Laws That Deprive People with Mental Disability of Life and Liberty (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2006).
Smilansky, Saul.Free Will and Illusion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000).
Smith, Angela M. “Responsibility for Attitudes: Activity and Passivity in Mental Life,” Ethics 115 (2005), 236–271.
Smith, J. C.Justification and Excuse in the Criminal Law (London: Stevens, 1989).
Steadman, Henry J., et al. Before and After Hinckley: Evaluating Insanity Defense Reform (New York: Guilford Press, 1993).
Steinhoff, Uwe. “Torture – The Case for Dirty Harry and against Alan Dershowitz,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2006), 337–353.
Steinhoff, Uwe. “Yet Another Revised DDE? A Note on David K. Chan's DDED,” Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 9 (2006), 231–236.
Stevenson, Jim, and Robert, Goodman. “Association between Behavior at Age 3 Years and Adult Criminality,” British Journal of Psychiatry 179 (2001), 197–202.
Strawson, Galen. “The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility,” Philosophical Studies 75 (1994), 5–24.
Strawson, Peter.“Freedom and Resentment,” in Free Will (Watson, Gary, ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982), 72–93.
Stuntz, William J. “The Pathological Politics of Criminal Law,” Michigan Law Review 100 (2001), 505–600.
Stuntz, William J. “Plea Bargaining and Criminal Law's Disappearing Shadow,” Harvard Law Review 117 (2004), 2548–2569.
Sunstein, Cass R., and Adrian Vermeule. “Is Capital Punishment Morally Required? The Relevance of Life-Life Tradeoffs,” Stanford Law Review 58 (2005), 703–750.
Tadros, Victor.Criminal Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
Tasioulas, John. “Punishment and Repentance,” Philosophy 81 (2006), 279–322.
Thomson, Judith Jarvis.“Self-Defense and Rights,” Lindley Lecture at the University of Kansas (April 5, 1976), reprinted in Judith Jarvis Thomson, Rights, Restitution, and Risk: Essays in Moral Theory (Parent, William, ed., Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986), 33–48.
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. “Some Ruminations on Rights,” 19 Arizona Law Review 45 (1977).
Varzi, Achille C., and Giuliano Torrengo. “Crimes and Punishments,” Philosophia 34 (2006), 395–404.
Vierkant, Tillman. “Owning Intentions and Moral Responsibility,” Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 8 (2005), 507–534.
Vranas, Peter B. M. “I Ought, Therefore I Can,” Philosophical Studies 136 (2007), 167–216.
Walen, Alec. “The Doctrine of Illicit Intentions,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 34 (2006), 39–67.
Walen, Alec. “Permissibly Encouraging the Impermissible,” Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (2004), 341–354.
Wallace, R. Jay.Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994).
Wasserstrom, Richard A. “H. L. A. Hart and the Doctrines of Mens Rea and Criminal Responsibility,” University of Chicago Law Review 35 (1967), 92–126.
Westen, Peter. “An Attitudinal Theory of Excuse,” Law & Philosophy 25 (2006), 289–375.
Westen, Peter. “Individualizing the Reasonable Person in Criminal Law,” Criminal Law & Philosophy 2 (2008), 137–162.
Westen, Peter. “Two Rules of Legality in Criminal Law,” Law & Philosophy 26 (2007), 229–305.
Westen, Peter. “Why Criminal Harm Matters: Plato's Abiding Insight in the Laws,” Criminal Law & Philosophy 1 (2007), 307–326.
Williams, Glanville Llewelyn.Criminal Law: The General Part (2d ed., London: Stevens, 1961).
Wright, Richard W. “Causation in Tort Law,” California Law Review 73 (1985), 1735–1828.
Yaffe, Gideon.“Trying, Acting and Attempted Crimes,” unpublished manuscript, on file with the authors.
Zaibert, Leo.Punishment and Retribution (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).
Zimmerman, Michael J. “Moral Luck: A Partial Map,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (2006), 585–608.
Zimmerman, Michael J. “Moral Responsibility and Ignorance,” Ethics 107 (1997), 410–426.
Zohar, Noam J. “Innocence and Complex Threats: Upholding the War Effort and the Condemnation of Terrorism,” Ethics 114 (2004), 734–751.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.