Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:42:21.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2024

Edited by
Phil Orchard  and
Antje Wiener
Phil Orchard
Affiliation:
University of Wollongong, New South Wales
Antje Wiener
Affiliation:
Universität Hamburg
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Contesting the World
Norm Research in Theory and Practice
 , pp. 275 - 329
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie, and Snidal, Duncan 2000. ‘The Concept of Legalization.’ International Organization 54(3): 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdelal, Rawi 2007. Capital Rules: The Construction of Global Finance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Abouharb, Rodwan M., and Cingranelli, David L. 2007. Human Rights and Structural Adjustment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Kavi J., and Abramson, Yehonathan 2015. ‘A Pragmatist Vocation for International Relations: The (Global) Public and Its Problems.’ European Journal of International Relations 23(1): 26–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav 2004. ‘How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism.’ International Organization 58(2): 239–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav 2013. ‘The R2P and Norm Diffusion: Towards a Framework of Norm Circulation.’ Global Responsibility to Protect 5(4): 466–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav 2014. ‘Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: New Agenda for International Studies.’ International Studies Quarterly 58: 647–659.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav 2015. Indonesia Matters: Asia’s Emerging Democratic Power. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav 2016. ‘Advancing Global IR: Challenges, Contentions, and Contributions.’ International Studies Review 18(1): 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acheson, Roy, and Butler, Maria 2019. ‘WPS and Arms Trade Treaty.’ In Davies, S. E., and True, J. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace, and Security, 690–703. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerly, Brooke A. 2003. ‘Women’s Human Rights Activists as Cross-Cultural Theorists.’ International Feminist Journal of Politics 3(3): 311–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adachi, Kenki 2005. ‘Why Japan Signed the Mine Ban Treaty: The Political Dynamics behind the Decision.’ Asian Survey 45(3): 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addams, Jane 2007. ‘The Newer Ideals of Peace.’ In Ely, R. T. (ed). The Citizen’s Library of Economics, Politics, and Sociology, 209–238. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Addams, Jane, Balch, Emily G., and Hamilton, Alice 2015. Women at The Hague: The International Congress of Women and Its Results. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel 1997. ‘Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics.’ European Journal of International Relations 3(3): 319–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel 2019. World Ordering: A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Matthew D. 2012. ‘Interpretive Contestation and Legal Correctness.’ William & Mary Law Review 53(4): 1115–1136.Google Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca 2014. ‘Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms, and Order in International Society.’ International Organization 68(1): 143–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Pouliot, Vincent 2014. ‘Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya.’ European Journal of International Relations 20(4): 889–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggestam, Karin 2019. ‘WPS, Peace Negotiations and Peace Agreements.’ In Davies, S. E., and True, J. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace, and Security, 815–828. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aggestam, Karin, and True, Jacqui 2023. ‘Foreign Policy and Feminist Governance.’ In Sawer, M., Banaschak, L., True, J., and Kantola, J. (eds). The Handbook of Feminist Governance, 203–215. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AIIB. 2018. ‘Policy on the Project-affected People’s Mechanism.’ 7 December. www.aiib.org/en/policies-strategies/_download/project-affected/PPM-policy.pdf.Google Scholar
Albert, Mathias 1999. ‘Observing World Politics: Luhman’s Systems Theory of Society and International Relations.’ Millennium – Journal of International Studies 28(2): 239–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Amanda 2015. ‘A Short History of International Humanitarian Law.’ European Journal of International Law 26(1): 109–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alsaba, Khuloud, and Kapilashrami, Anuj 2016. ‘Understanding Women’s Experiences of Violence and the Political Economy of Gender: The Case of Syria.’ Reproductive Health Matters 24: 5–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alter, Karen J. 2014. The New Terrain of International Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Meunier, Sophie 2009. ‘The Politics of International Regime Complexity.’ Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amnesty International. 2004. ‘USA: Pattern of Brutality and Cruelty. War Crimes at Abu Ghraib.’ Amnesty International Press Release, 7 May.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2008. ‘Myanmar Briefing. Human Rights Concerns a Month after Cyclone Nargis.’ 5 June. www.amnesty.org/es/wpcontent/uploads/2021/07/asa160132008eng.pdf.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2019. ‘Coming Face to Face with Torture.’ www.amnestyusa.org/coming-face-to-face-with-torture/.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2022. ‘Israel’s Apartheid against Palestinians: Cruel System of Domination and Crime against Humanity.’ Released 2 February, https://amnesty.org.Google Scholar
Anderl, Felix and Witt, Antonia 2020. ‘Problematising the Global in Global IR.’ Millennium 49(1): 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderlini, Sanam N. 2019. ‘Civil Society Leadership in Adopting 1325 Resolution.’ In Davies, S. E., and True, J. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace, and Security, 38–52. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher G. 2013. Canadian Liberalism and the Politics of Border Control, 1867–1967. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Anelay, Joyce (The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office) 2014. ‘Mediterranean Sea Question Asked by Lord Hylton.’ UK Parliament. www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201415/ldhansrd/text/141015w0001.htm.Google Scholar
Anievas, Alexander, Manchanda, Nivi, and Shilliam, , Robbie (eds). 2015. Race and Racism in International Relations: Confronting the Global Colour Line. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Annan, Kofi 1999. ‘Two Concepts of Sovereignty.’ The Economist, 18 September.Google Scholar
Annan, Kofi 2004. ‘Secretary-General’s Address to the General Assembly.’ United Nations Secretary-General. www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2004-09-21/secretary-generals-address-general-assembly.Google Scholar
Arnold, Magda B. 1960. Emotion and Personality. Irvington: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Aust, Helmut P. 2015. ‘The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy: An Effective Mechanism against Complicity of Peacekeeping Forces?’ Conflict and Security Law 20(1): 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert 1986. ‘An Evolutionary Approach to Norms.’ American Political Science Review 80(4): 1095–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azuma, Eiichiro 2019. ‘Japanese Agricultural Labor Program: Temporary Worker Immigration, US-Japan Cultural Diplomacy, and Ethnic Community Making among Japanese Americans.’ In Marinar, M., Hsu, M., and García, M.C. (eds). A Nation of Immigrants Reconsidered: US Society in an Age of Restriction, 1924–1965, 161–186. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Babb, Sarah 2009. Behind the Development Banks. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badescu, Cristina G., and Weiss, Thomas G. 2010. ‘Misrepresenting R2P and Advancing Norms: An Alternative Spiral?’ International Studies Perspectives 11(4): 354–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Jennifer L. 2008. ‘Arrested Development: The Fight to End Commercial Whaling as a Case of Failed Norm Change.’ European Journal of International Relations 14(2): 289–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkin, Samuel J., and Cronin, Bruce 1994. ‘The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations.’ International Organization 48 (1): 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkin, Samuel J., and Sjoberg, Laura 2019. International Relations’ Last Synthesis? Decoupling Constructivist and Critical Approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basham, Victoria M. 2015. ‘Waiting for War. Soldiering, Temporality and the Gendered Politics of Boredom and Joy in Military Spaces.’ In Ahall, L., and Gregory, T. (eds). Emotions, Politics and War, 128–140. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Basu, Soumita 2016. ‘The Global South Writes 1325 (Too).’ International Political Science Review 37(3): 362–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC. 2021. ‘Vitaly Shishov: Head of Belarus Exiles Group Found Dead in Ukraine.’ 3 August. www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-58065313.Google Scholar
BBC News. 2016. ‘Ukraine Crisis: Timeline.’ BBC News, 24 February. www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-26248275.Google Scholar
Beauregard, Philippe 2019. ‘Beyond Cold Monsters: A Cognitive-Affective Theory of International Leadership.’ Dissertation. Université de Laval. https://corpus.ulaval.ca/jspui/bitstream/20.500.11794/36238/1/35290.pdf.Google Scholar
Beetham, David 2013. The Legitimation of Power. 2nd ed. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beirlaen, Mathieu 2011. ‘A Unifying Framework for Reasoning about Normative Conflicts.’ In Pelis, M., and Puchocar, V. (eds). The Logica Yearbook, 1–14. College Publications. www.clps.ugent.be/sites/default/files/publications/logica2011_proceedings.pdfGoogle Scholar
Belich, James 2009. Replenishing the Earth: The Settler Revolution and the Rise of the Anglo-World, 1783–1939. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J. 2010. ‘The Responsibility to Protect – Five Years On.’ Ethics & International Affairs 24(2): 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J. 2011. Global Politics and The Responsibility to Protect: From Words to Deeds. Oxford and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J. 2016. ‘The Humanisation of Security? Towards an International Human Protection Regime.’ European Journal of International Security 1(1): 112–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J., and Drummond, Catherine 2011. ‘The Responsibility to Protect in Southeast Asia: Between Non-Interference and Sovereignty as Responsibility.’ The Pacific Review 24(2): 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belta. 2021. ‘Belarus Participates in ICAO Council Session on Ryanair’s Flight FR4978 Incident.’ 29 June. https://eng.belta.by/society/view/belarus-participates-in-icao-council-session-on-ryanairs-flight-fr4978-incident-141272-2021/.Google Scholar
Ben-Josef Hirsch, Michal. 2009. ‘And the Truth Shall Make You Free: The International Norm of Truth-Seeking.’ Ph.D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Ben-Josef Hirsch, Michal. 2014. ‘Ideational Change and the Emergence of the International Norm of Truth and Reconciliation Commissions.’ European Journal of International Relations 20(3): 810–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Josef Hirsch, Michal, and Dixon, Jennifer M. 2021. ‘Conceptualizing and Assessing Norm Strength in International Relations.’ European Journal of International Relations 27(2): 521–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Josef Hirsch, Michal, and Dixon, Jennifer M. 2024. ‘Rethinking Norm Change: Content and Strength in Norm Development.’ In Orchard, P., and Wiener, A. (eds). Contesting the World. Norm Research in Theory and Practice, 29–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Thomas U. 1996. ‘Norms, Identity, and National Security in Germany and Japan.’ In Katzenstein, P. (ed). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, 317–356. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Berkman, Joyce 1990. Feminism, War, and Peace Politics: The Case of World War I. Savage: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Berkovitch, Nitza, and Gordon, Neve 2016. ‘Differentiated Decoupling and Human Rights.’ Social Problems 63(4): 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berliner, Daniel, and Prakash, Aseem 2012. ‘From Norms to Programs: The United Nations Global Compact and Global Governance.’ Regulation and Governance 6: 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Steven 2000. ‘Ideas, Social Structure and the Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism.’ European Journal of International Relations 6(4): 464–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Steven 2001. The Compromise of Liberal Environmental Norms. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/bern12036.6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, Alexander, and Orchard, Phil 2014. ‘Introduction: The Normative Institutionalization-Implementation Gap.’ In Betts, A., and Orchard, P. (eds). Implementation and World Politics: How International Norms Change Practice, 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewarder, Manuel, and Walter, Lisa 2017. ‘Rettungseinsätze vor Libyen müssen auf den Prüfstand – Interview mit Frontex Direktor Fabrice Leggeri.’ Die Welt Online, 27 February. www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article162394787/Rettungseinsaetze-vor-Libyen-muessen-auf-den-Pruefstand.html.Google Scholar
Bhabha, Jacqueline 2014. Child Migration and Human Rights in a Global Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhana, Surendra 1997. Gandhi’s Legacy: The Natal Indian Congress, 1894–1994. Scottsville: University of Natal Press.Google Scholar
Bially Mattern, Janice 2011. ‘A Practice Theory of Emotion for International Relations.’ In Adler, E., and Pouliot, V. (eds). International Practices, 63–86. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bially Mattern, Janice, and Zarakol, Ayşe 2016. ‘Hierarchies in World Politics.’ International Organization 70(3): 623–654. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818316000126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Andrea 2009. ‘The International Regulation of the Use of Force: The Politics of Interpretive Method.’ Leiden Journal of International Law 22(4): 651–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Andrea 2016. ‘But We Don’t Call It “Torture”! Norm Contestation during the US “War on Terror”.’ International Politics 53(2). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2015.42.Google Scholar
Birkenkötter, Hannah 2020. ‘International Law as a Common Language across Spheres of Authority?’ Global Constitutionalism 9(2): 318–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, David 1999. ‘The Long and Winding Road: International Norms and Domestic Political Change in South Africa.’ In Risse, T., Ropp, S., and Sikkink, K. (eds). The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, 78–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, T. 2007. ‘The Struggle for Openness in the International Financial Institutions.’ In Florini, A. (ed). The Right to Know: Transparency in an Open World, 243–278. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleiker, Roland, and Hutchison, Emma. 2008. ‘Fear No More: Emotions and World Politics.’ Review of International Studies 34: 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloodgood, Elizabeth A., and Clough, Emily 2017. ‘Transnational Advocacy Networks: A Complex Adaptive Systems Simulation Model of the Boomerang Effect.’ Social Science Computer Review 35(3): 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439316634077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Alan 2016. ‘Norm Antipreneurs and Theorising Resistance to Normative Change.’ Review of International Studies 42(2): 310–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Alan, and Scott, Shirley V. (eds). 2016. Norm Antipreneurs and the Politics of Resistance to Global Normative Change. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315707341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel 2017. ‘The Role of the International Court of Justice in Addressing Climate Change: Some Preliminary Reflections Symposium: The Forefront of International Law.’ Arizona State Law Journal 49(Special Issue): 689–712.Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel, Brunnée, Jutta, and Rajamani, Lavanya 2017. International Climate Change Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boekle, Henning, Rittberger, Volker, and Wagner, Wolfgang 1999. ‘Norms and Foreign Policy: Constructivist Foreign Policy Theory.’ Tübinger Arbeitspapiere zur Internationalen Politik und Friedensforschung 34a: 1–46.Google Scholar
Bogdandy, Armin von, and Venzke, Ingo (eds). 2012. International Judicial Lawmaking. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgen, Christopher J. 2009. ‘The Language of Law and the Practice of Politics: Great Powers and the Rhetoric of Self-Determination in the Cases of Kosovo and South Ossetia.’ Chicago Journal of International Law 10: 1–34.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A. and Risse, Thomas 2000. ‘When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change.’ European Integration Online Papers 4(15). http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-015a.htm.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A. and Risse, Thomas 2003. ‘Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe.’ In Featherstone, K., and Radaelli, C.M. (eds). The Politics of Europeanization, 57–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A., and Zürn, Michael 2021. ‘Contestations of the Liberal International Order: From Liberal Multilateralism to Postnational Liberalism.’ International Organization 75(2): 282–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1980. Le Sens Pratique. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1987. ‘The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.’ Hastings Law Journal 38(5): 814–853.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loic 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Bousquet, Antoine, and Curtis, Simon 2011. ‘Beyond Models and Metaphors: Complexity Theory, Systems Thinking and International Relations.’ Cambridge Review of International Affairs 24(1): 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2011.558054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousquet, Antoine, and Geyer, Robert 2011. ‘Introduction: Complexity and the International Arena.’ Cambridge Review of International Affairs 24(1): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2011.558713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, Adam 2015. ‘Arguing with Law: Strategic Legal Argumentation, US Diplomacy, and Debates over the International Criminal Court.’ Review of International Studies 41(2): 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210514000217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braaten, Daniel B. 2016. ‘Ambivalent Engagement: Human Rights and the Multilateral Development Banks.’ In Park, S., and Strand, J. (eds). Global Economic Governance and the Development Practices of the Multilateral Development Banks, 99–118. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bradlow, Daniel 2019. ‘Mulilaterals Must Earn the Right to Limited Immunity.’ Financial Times, 28 March. www.ft.com/content/2512aa84-515d-11e9-9c76-bf4a0ce37d49.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John 2002. Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John 2021. ‘Glimmers of Cosmopolitan Criminology.’ International Criminology. Online First. 1–8.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Pettit, Philip 1992. Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John, Coglianese, Cary, and Levi-Faur, David 2007. ‘Can Regulation and Governance Make a Difference?’ Regulation and Governance 1(1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, Lothar 1999. ‘Normative Integration und kollektive Handlungskompetenz auf internationaler Ebene.’ Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 6(2): 323–347.Google Scholar
Brosig, Malte 2012. ‘No Space for Constructivism? A Critical Appraisal of European Compliance Research.’ Perspectives on European Politics and Society 13(4): 390–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Garrett W. 2010. ‘Safeguarding Deliberative Global Governance: The Case of The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.’ Review of International Studies 36: 511–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Garrett W. 2014. ‘Norm Diffusion and Health System Strengthening: The Persistent Relevance of National Leadership in Global Health Governance.’ Review of International Studies 40(5): 877–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Garrett W. 2015. ‘Knowledge, Politics and Power in Global Health.’ International Journal of Health Policy and Management 4(2): 111–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. 2010. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. 2011. ‘Interactional International Law: An Introduction.’ International Theory 3(2): 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. 2012. ‘Constructivism and International Law. In Dunoff, J. L., and Pollack, M. A. (eds). Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, 119–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. 2018. ‘International Law and the Practice of Legality: Stability and Change.’ Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 49(4): 429–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. 2019. ‘Norm Robustness and Contestation in International Law: Self-Defense against Nonstate Actors.’ Journal of Global Security Studies 4(1): 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueger, Christian, and Gadinger, Frank 2015. ‘The Play of International Practice.’ International Studies Quarterly 59: 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueger, Christian, and Gadinger, Frank 2018. International Practice Theory. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buitelaar, Tom, and Hirschmann, Gisela 2021. ‘Criminal Accountability at What Cost? Norm Conflict, UN Peace Operations and the International Criminal Court.’ European Journal of International Relations 27(2): 548–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukovansky, Mlada, Clark, Ian, Eckersley, Robyn, Price, Richard, Reus-Smit, Christian, and Wheeler, Nicholas J. 2012. Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Roland 2010. Decolonization and the Evolution of International Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busby, Joshua W. 2007. ‘Bono Made Jesse Helms Cry: Jubilee 2000, Debt Relief, and Moral Action in International Politics.’ International Studies Quarterly 5(2): 247–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Marc L. 2007. ‘Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade.’ International Organization 61(4): 735–761. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, George W. 2004. ‘Remarks Following Discussions with Prime Minister Peter Medgyessy of Hungary and an Exchange with Reporters.’ www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-following-discussions-with-prime-minister-peter-medgyessy-hungary-and-exchange.Google Scholar
Butt, Nathalie, Lambrick, Frances, Menton, Mary, and Renwick, Anna 2019. ‘The Supply Chain of Violence.’ Nature Sustainability 2: 742–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Búzás, Zoltan I. 2021a. Evading International Norms: Race and Rights in the Shadow of Legality. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Búzás, Zoltan I. 2021b. ‘Racism and Antiracism in the Liberal International Order.’ International Organization 75(2): 440–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, Michael 2003. ‘Preemptive Self-Defense: Hegemony, Equality and Strategies of Legal Change.’ Journal of Political Philosophy 11(2): 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camacho, Alejandro E., and Glicksman, Robert L. 2021. ‘Designing Regulation Across Organizations: Assessing the Functions and Dimensions of Governance.’ Regulation and Governance. Early View, 3 July.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron Miles. 2021. ‘Belarus and the Hijacking of Ryanair Flight FR4978: A Preliminary International Law Analysis.’ Lawfare, 24 May. www.lawfareblog.com/belarus-and-hijacking-ryanair-flight-fr4978-preliminary-international-law-analysis.Google Scholar
Capie, David 2012. ‘The Responsibility to Protect Norm in Southeast Asia: Framing, Resistance, and the Localization Myth.’ The Pacific Review 25(1): 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardenas, Sonia 2007. Conflict and Compliance: State Responses to International Human Rights Pressure. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Charli R. 2005. ‘“Women, Children and Other Vulnerable Groups”: Gender, Strategic Frames and the Protection of Civilians as a Transnational Issue.’ International Studies Quarterly 49(2): 295–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Charli R. 2007. ‘Setting the Advocacy Agenda: Theorizing Issue Emergence and Nonemergence in Transnational Advocacy Networks.’ International Studies Quarterly 51(1): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Charli R. 2011. ‘Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms.’ International Organization 65(1): 69–102. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818310000329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Charli R. 2014. Lost Causes: Agenda Vetting in Global Issue Networks and the Shaping of Human Security. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Carraro, Valentina, Conzelmann, Thomas, and Jongen, Hortense 2019. ‘Fears of Peers? Explaining Peer and Public Shaming in Global Governance.’ Cooperation and Conflict 54(3): 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartan, Brian 2008. ‘Thai Ties Bind Myanmar Cyclone Relief.’ Asia Times, 24 May.Google Scholar
Carter, George 2021. ‘Pacific Island States and 30 Years of Global Climate Change Negotiations.’ In Klöck, C., Castro, P., Weiler, F., and Blaxkejaer, L. (eds). Coalitions in the Climate Change Negotiations, 73–90. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik 1997. Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop and Dissolve. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for Justice and Accountability. 2010. ‘Human Rights Abuses in the USA.’ Center for Justice and Accountability.Google Scholar
CEPAL, UNICEF, and Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Violence against Children. 2020. Violence against Children and Adolescents in the Time of COVID-19. COVID-19 Report. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
CFFP. 2020. A Feminist Foreign Policy for the European Union. Belgium: The Greens/EFA in the European Parliament.Google Scholar
Chaiken, Shelly, Wood, Wendy, and Eagly, Alice H. 1996. ‘Principles of Persuasion.’ In Higgins, E. T., and Kruglanski, A. W. (eds). Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, 702–742. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise 2016. Gender Justice and the International Criminal Court. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, Hilary, and Farrall, Jeremy 2016. ‘Regulating the Rule of Law through the Security Council.’ In Charlesworth, H., and Farrall, J. (eds). Strengthening the Rule of Law through the UN Security Council, 1–10. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia H. 1993. ‘On Compliance.’ International Organization 47(2): 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeff T. 1997. ‘International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist-Constructivist Divide.’ European Journal of International Relations 3(4): 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066197003004003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeff T. 1998. ‘The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory.’ World Politics 50(2): 324–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeff T. 1999. ‘Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe.’ International Studies Quarterly 43(1): 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeff T. 2001. ‘The Europeanization of Citizenship?’ In Cowles, M. G., Caporaso, J., and Risse, T. (eds). Transforming Europe. Europeanization and Domestic Change, 180–197. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeff T. 2005. ‘International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework.’ International Organization 59(4): 801–826. www.jstor.org/stable/3877829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinkin, Christine M. 2019. ‘Adoption of 1325 Resolution.’ In Davies, S. E., and True, J. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace, and Security, 26–37. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cholvy, Laurence, and Cuppens, Frédéric 1995. ‘Solving Normative Conflicts by Merging Roles.’ In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chongkittavorn, Kavi 2007. ‘Time for Thailand to Revisit Its Policy on Burma.’ The Nation, 29 October.Google Scholar
CIEL. 2016. ‘NGO Response: Proposed World Bank Safeguards Represent Dangerous Set-Back to Key Environmental and Social Protections,’ Press Release 22 July. 19 December. www.ciel.org/news/safeguard-policy-endangers-rights/.Google Scholar
Clapham, A. 2006. Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D., Fox, J., and Treakle, K. 2003. Demanding Accountability: Civil-Society Claims and the World Bank Inspection Panel. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Climate Mayors 2020. ‘Climate Mayors.’ https://climatemayors.org/.Google Scholar
Cloward, Karisa 2016. When Norms Collide. Local Responses to Activism Against Female Genital Mutilation and Early Marriage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, Molly 1999. Normative Theory in International Relations. A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, Molly 2017. ‘The “Newer Ideals” of Jane Addams’s Progressivism: A Realistic Utopia of Cosmopolitan Justice.’ In Cochran, M., and Navari, C. (eds). Progressivism and US Foreign Policy between the World Wars, 143–166. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogan, Jacob K. 2011. ‘The Regulatory Turn in International Law.’ Harvard International Law Journal 52(2): 322–372.Google Scholar
Cohn, Carol 2006. ‘Motive and Methods: Using Multi-Sited Ethnography to Study US National Security Discourses.’ In Ackerly, B. A., Stern, M., and True, J. (eds). Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, 91–107. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Katherine P. 2013. ‘Locating Norm Diplomacy: Venue Change in International Norm Negotiations.’ European Journal of International Relations 19(1): 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111411209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colgan, Jeff D., Keohane, Robert O., and Van de Graaf, Thijs 2012. ‘Punctuated Equilibrium in the Energy Regime Complex.’ Review of International Organizations 7(2): 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-011-9130-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Richard 2017. ‘Sources and the Legitimate Authority of International Law: A Challenge to the “Standard View”?’ In Besson, S., and D’Aspremont, J. (eds). The Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law, 703–723. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conca, Ken 2015. An Unfinished Foundation: The United Nations and Global Environmental Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Confortini, Catia C. 2012. Intelligent Compassion: Feminist Critical Methodology in the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, Kate 2016. ‘German Government Approves strict Limits on EU Migrant Claiming Benefits.’ The Guardian, 12 October. www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/12/german-government-approves-bill-to-stop-eu-migrants-claiming-benefits.Google Scholar
Cook, Sam 2016. ‘The ‘Woman-in-Conflict’ at the UN Security Council: A Subject of Practice.’ International Affairs 92(2): 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Frederick 2005. Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooperman, Alan 2002. ‘CIA Techniques Called into Question: A Human-Rights Group Said Interrogation Methods Used on al-Qaeda Detainees Might Be Torture.’ Philadelphia Inquirer, 29 December.Google Scholar
Cortell, Andrew P., and Davis, James W. 2000. ‘Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms: A Research Agenda.’ International Studies Review 2(1): 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortell, Andrew P., and Davis, James W. 2005. ‘When Norms Clash: International Norms, Domestic Practices, and Japan’s Internalisation of the GATT/WTO.’ Review of International Studies 31(1): 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotsaftis, Michel. 2009. ‘What Makes a System Complex? – An Approach to Self Organization and Emergence.’ In Aziz-Alaoui, M. A., and Bertelle, C. (eds). From System Complexity to Emergent Properties, 49–99. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02199-2_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowles, Maria Green, Caporaso, James, and Risse, Thomas (eds). 2001. Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta C. 1993. ‘Decolonization as an International Norm: The Evolution of Practices, Arguments, and Beliefs.’ In Reed, Laura E., and Kaysen, Carl (eds). Emerging Norms of Humanitarian Intervention: A Collection of Essays from a Project of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 37–61. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta C. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Neta C. 2016. ‘Studying World Politics as a Complex Adaptive System.’ In Booth, K., and Erskine, T. (eds). International Relations Theory Today. 2nd ed., 263–267. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta, and Klotz, Audie (eds). 1999. How Sanctions Work: Lessons from South Africa. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, David A. 1999. ‘Reckoning with Past Wrongs: A Normative Framework.’ Ethics & International Affairs 13(1): 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, Noele 2020. ‘Conceptualising Consistency: Coherence, Principles, and the Practice of Human Protection.’ Global Responsibility to Protect 12(4): 440–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusumano, Eugenio, and Villa, Matteo 2021. ‘From “Angels” to “Vice Smugglers”: The Criminalization of Sea Rescue NGOs in Italy.’ European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 27(1): 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Alessandra, Federica 2017. ‘The Accountability Turn in Third Wave Human Rights Fact-Finding.’ Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 33(84): 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Alessandra, Federica, Rapp, Stephen, Sutherland, Kirsty, and Ashraph, Sareta 2022. Anchoring Accountability for Mass Atrocities. The Permanent Support Needed to Fulfil UN Investigative Mandates. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Ethics, Law, and Armed Conflict.Google Scholar
Daly, Erin 2008. ‘Truth Skepticism: An Inquiry into the Value of Truth in Times of Transition.’ The International Journal of Transitional Justice 2(March): 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijn004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, Antonio 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
D’Amato, Anthony 1987. ‘Trashing Customary International Law.’ The American Journal of International Law 81(1): 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darrow, Mac 2003. Between Light and Shadow: The World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and International Human Rights Law. Oxford, Portland and Oregon: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Darrow, Mac 2021. ‘Up the Stream without a Paddle: Human Rights Challenges in Mega-infrastructure Finance and Investment.’ In Bhuta, N. (ed). The Struggle for Human Rights: Essays in honour of Philip Alston. Oxford University Press, online first.Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, Jeanne 2016. Epistemic Forces in International Law: Foundational Doctrines and Argumentation. Cheltenham: Elgar International Law.Google Scholar
Davies, Sara E., and True, Jacqui 2017. ‘Norm Entrepreneurship in International Politics: William Hague and the Prevention of Sexual Violence in Conflict.’ Foreign Policy Analysis 13(3): 701–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Maizière, Thomas 2014. ‘Rede von Bundesminister Dr. Thomas de Maizière anlässlich der ersten Beratung des Bundeshaushaltes 2015.’ www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/reden/DE/2014/09/haushaltsrede-2015.html.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole 2009. ‘The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case.’ International Organization 63(1): 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole 2019. ‘Is the R2P Failing? The Controversy about Norm Justification and Norm Application of the Responsibility to Protect.’ Global Responsibility to Protect 11(2): 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Zimmermann, Lisbeth 2019. ‘Norms under Challenge: Unpacking the Dynamics of Norm Robustness.’ Journal of Global Security Studies 4(1): 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogy041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Zimmermann, Lisbeth 2020. ‘Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Robustness of International Norms.’ International Studies Review 22(1): 51–76.Google Scholar
Dellinger, Myanna 2017. ‘See You in Court: Around the World in Eight Climate Change Lawsuits.’ William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 42 (2): 525–552.Google Scholar
Dellmuth, Lisa, and Schlipphak, Bernd 2020. ‘Legitimacy Beliefs towards Global Governance Institutions: A Research Agenda.’ Journal of European Public Policy 27(6): 931–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMeritt, Jacqueline H. R. 2012. ‘International Organizations and Government Killing: Does Naming and Shaming Save Lives?’ International Interactions 38(5): 597–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dessler, David 1989. ‘What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?’ International Organization, 43(3): 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John 1915 [1998]. ‘The Logic of Judgments of Practice’, first published in Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 12, 505–523, 533–543. Republished in Hickman, L. A., and Alexander, T. M. (eds). The Essential Dewey. Volume 2. Ethics, Logic, Psychology, 236–271. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John 1925a [1998]. ‘The Development of American Pragmatism’, first published in Department of Philosophy, Columbia University (ed). Studies in the History of Ideas. Republished in Hickman, L. A., and Alexander, T. M. (eds). The Essential Dewey. Volume 1. Pragmatism, Education, Democracy, 3–13. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John 1925b [1998]. ‘Existence, Value and Criticism’, from Experience and Nature. In Hickman, L. A., and Alexander, T. M. (eds). The Essential Dewey. Volume 2. Ethics, Logic, Psychology, 84–101. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John 1927. The Public and Its Problems. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Madsen, Mikael R. 2012. ‘The Force of Law and Lawyers: Pierre Bourdieu and the Reflexive Sociology of Law.’ Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8(1): 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diez, Thomas, and Wiener, Antje 2018. ‘Introducing the Mosaic of Integration Theory.’ KFG Working Paper Series No. 88 (Online). Freie Universität Berlin, FB Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften, Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft KollegForschergruppe ‘The Transformative Power of Europe.’ https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-57752-1.Google Scholar
Dixon, Jennifer M. 2017. ‘Rhetorical Adaptation and Resistance to International Norms.’ Perspectives on Politics 15(1): 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dönges, Hannah E., and Kullenberg, Janosch 2019. ‘What Works (and Fails) in Protection.’ In Davies, S. E., and True, J. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace, and Security, 161–177. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, John 1986. ‘International Human Rights: A Regime Analysis.’ International Organization 40(3): 599–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, John 2012. ‘The Elements of the Structures of International Systems.’ International Organization 66(4): 609–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, John 2019. ‘Systems, Levels, and Structural Theory: Waltz’s Theory Is Not a Systemic Theory (and Why That Matters for International Relations Today).’ European Journal of International Relations 25(3): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066118820929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosch, Jörn 2014. ‘Mahathirism and Its Legacy in Malaysia’s Foreign Policy.’ European Journal of East Asian Studies 13(1): 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doty, Roxanne L. 1993. ‘The Bounds of “Race” in International Relations.’ Millennium 22(3): 443–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doty, Roxanne L. 2004. ‘Maladies of Our Souls: Identity and Voice in the Writing of Academic International Relations.’ Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17(2): 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N. 1996. ‘Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?’ International Organization 50(3): 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drahos, Peter, and Krygier, Martin 2017. ‘Regulation, Institutions and Networks.’ In Drahos, P. (ed). Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications, 1–24. Canberra: ANU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draude, Anke 2017. ‘The Agency of the Governed in Transfer and Diffusion Studies.’ Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 2(5): 577–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draude, Anke (ed). 2019. The Agency of the Governed in the Global South: Normative and Institutional Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dreyling, Justus 2021. ‘Institutional Complexity and Opportunity Structures: Weaker Actor Influence in International Intellectual Property Regulation.’ Global Policy 12(S4): 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2009. ‘The Power and Peril of International Regime Complexity.’ Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driesen, David M. 2019. ‘President Trump’s Executive Orders and the Rule of Law.’ UMKC Law Review 87(Spring): 489–524.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 2004. ‘Pragmatism and Democracy: In Search of Deliberative Publics.’ The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18(1): 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudziak, Mary L. 2000. Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Pollack, Mark A. (eds). 2013. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Pollack, Mark A. (eds). 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method: And Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method. London, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
DW. 2021. ‘Angela Merkel says Belarus’ story “completely implausible”.’ 24 May. www.dw.com/en/angela-merkel-says-belarus-story-completely-implausible/a-57639025.Google Scholar
Eckel, Jan, and Moyn, Samuel 2014. The Breakthrough: Human Rights in the 1970s. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Pearce 2020. ‘Why No Justice for Past Repression? Militaries and Human Rights Organizations in Post-Authoritarian States.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 65(4): 759–787. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002720957068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiichiro, Washio 2021. ‘Statement by H.E. Mr. Washio Eiichiro, State Minister for Foreign Affairs of Japan at the Sixth Annual Pledging Conference for the Implementation of the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention.’ www.disarm.emb-japan.go.jp/files/100174366.pdf.Google Scholar
Elhag, Abdullatif A.O., Breuker, Joost, and Brouwer, Bob W. 2000. ‘On the Formal Analysis of Normative Conflicts.’ Information & Communications Technology Law 9(3): 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elshtain, Jean B. 2002. Jane Addams and the Dream of American Democracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon 1989. ‘Social Norms and Economic Theory.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(4): 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelkamp, Stephan, and Glaab, Katharina 2015. ‘Writing Norms: Constructivist Norm Research and the Politics of Ambiguity.’ Alternatives 40(3–4): 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engerman, Stanley L. 2009. ‘Apologies, Regrets, and Reparations.’ European Review 17(3–4): 593–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, Toni (ed). 2003a. Can Institutions Have Responsibilities. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, Toni (ed). 2003b. ‘Making Sense of ‘Responsibility’ in International Relations.’ In Erskine, T. (ed). Can Institutions Have Responsibilities, 1–16. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, Toni (ed). 2008. ‘Locating Responsibility: The Problem of Moral Agency in International Relations.’ In Reus-Smit, C., and Snidal, D. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, 699–707. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erskine, Toni (ed). 2012. ‘Whose Progress, Which Morals? Constructivism, Normative IR Theory and the Limits and Possibilities of Studying Ethics in World Politics.’ International Theory 4(3): 449–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essam, Amr 2016. ‘The Like Minded Group (LMG): Speaking Truth to Power.’ Universal Rights Group, 10 May. www.universal-rights.org/blog/like-minded-group-lmg-speaking-truth-power/.Google Scholar
Euronews. 2021. ‘“Putin Supports Lukashenko Amid Outcry over Ryanair Flight Diversion”.’ 29 May. www.euronews.com/2021/05/28/putin-supports-lukashenko-amid-outcry-over-ryanair-flight-diversion.Google Scholar
European Commission (DG1). 1998. 1/D/3/BW D (98) – Note on the WHO’s Revised Drug Strategy.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2021. ‘Opening Remarks by President von der Leyen at the Joint Press Conference with President Michel Following the Special Meeting of the European Council of 24 May 2021.’ https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_21_2661.Google Scholar
European Court of Justice. 2016. Press Release No. 63/16.Google Scholar
European Union External Action Service. 2021. ‘Belarus: Joint Statement by Canada, the European Union, United Kingdom, and United States.’ 21 June. https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/100402/belarus-joint-statement-canada-european-union-united-kingdom-and-united-states_en.Google Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew 1999. Unarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth, and Thakur, Ramesh 2013. ‘Correspondence: Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect.’ International Security 37(4): 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evers, Miles M. 2017. ‘On Transgression.’ International Studies Quarterly 61(4): 786–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrall, Jeremy, and Rubenstein, Kim 2009. ‘Filling or Falling between the Cracks? Law’s Potential: Introduction.’ In Farrall, J., and Rubenstein, K. (eds). Sanctions, Accountability and Governance in a Globalised World, 1–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, Raphaëlle, Prizzon, Annalisa, and Rogerson, Andrew 2015. Multilateral Development Banks: A Short Guide. Overseas Development Institute (ODI) Report. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1997. ‘Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(1): 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehl, Caroline 2018. ‘Navigating Norm Complexity: A Shared Research Agenda for Diverse Constructivist Perspectives.’ PRIF Working Papers 41. Frankfurt/Main: Peace Research Institute Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Fehl, Caroline 2019. ‘Bombs, Trials, and Rights: Norm Complexity and the Evolution of Liberal Intervention Practices.’ Human Rights Quarterly 4(4): 893–915. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2019.0066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehl, Caroline, and Rosert, Elvira 2020. ‘It’s Complicated: A Conceptual Framework for Studying Relations and Interactions between International Norms.’ PRIF Working Papers 49. Frankfurt/Main: Peace Research Institute Frankfurt. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.21.5.608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew 2004. ‘Deliberative Democracy and Two Models of Pragmatism.’ European Journal of Social Theory 7(3): 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fierke, Karin M. 2013. Political Self-Sacrifice: Agency, Body and Emotion in International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fierke, Karin M., and Jørgensen, Knud E. (eds). 2001. Constructing International Relations: The Next Generation. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha 1996. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha 2000. ‘Are Legal Norms Distinctive?’ NYU Journal of International Law and Politics 32(3): 699–705.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn 1998. ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.’ International Organization 52(4): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Toope, Stephen J. 2001. ‘Alternatives to “Legalization”: Richer Views of Law and Politics.’ International Organization 55(3): 743–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fioretos, Orfeo, and Heldt, Eugénia C. 2019. ‘Legacies and Innovations in Global Economic Governance Since Bretton Woods.’ Review of International Political Economy 26(6): 1089–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley 1990. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, David S., and Cook-Martin, David 2014. Culling the Masses: The Democratic Origins of Racist Immigration Policy in the Americas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flonk, Danielle, Jachtenfuchs, Markus, and Obendiek, Anke S. 2020. ‘Authority Conflicts in Internet Governance: Liberals vs. Sovereigntists?’ Global Constitutionalism 9(2): 364–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045381720000167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florini, Ann 1996. ‘The Evolution of International Norms.’ International Studies Quarterly 40(3): 363–389. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, Frank 2021. ‘The (De)Legitimation of Torture: Rhetoric, Shaming and Narrative Contestation in Two British Cases.’ European Journal of International Relations 27(1): 102–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120950011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, Caroline E. 2011. Science and the Precautionary Principle in International Courts and Tribunals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Rosemary and Walter, Andrew. 2013. ‘Global Norms and Major State Behaviour: The Cases of China and the United States.’ European Journal of International Relations 19(2): 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J. 2000. ‘The World Bank Inspection Panel: Lessons from the First Five Years.’ Global Governance 6(3): 279–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan, and Brown, David L., (eds). 1998. The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs and Grassroots Movements. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, James C. 2008. ‘Shame on You: The Impact of Human Rights Criticism on Political Repression in Latin America.’ International Studies Quarterly 52(1): 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. 2020. Democracy under Lockdown: The Impact of COVID-19 on the Global Struggle for Freedom. Washington, DC: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Friedman, Jeffrey 2012. ‘System Effects and the Problem of Prediction.’ Critical Review 24(3): 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2012.779806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrichs, Jörg, and Kratochwil, Friedrich 2009. ‘On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology.’ International Organization 63(4): 701–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friman, Richard (ed). 2015. The Politics of Leverage in International Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friman, Richard (ed). 2019. ‘An “Untrammeled Right”? The McCarran Immigration Subcommittee and the Origins of Presidential Authority to Suspend and Restrict Alien Entry under §1182(f).’ Journal of Policy History 31(4): 433–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Mervyn 1996. Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, Sanae 2013. The World Bank, Asian Development Bank and Human Rights. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon 1969. The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Anne T., and David, Fiona 2014. The International Law of Migrant Smuggling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambale, Maria L. 2016. ‘How Syrian Women Landed at the UN Peace Talks and What It All Means.’ PassBlue, 10 May. www.passblue.com/2016/05/10/how-syrian-women-landed-at-the-un-peace-talks-and-what-it-all-means/.Google Scholar
Garriga, Ana C. 2016. ‘Human Rights Regimes, Reputation, and Foreign Direct Investment.’ International Studies Quarterly 60(1): 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqw006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehring, Thomas, and Faude, Benjamin 2013. ‘The Dynamics of Regime Complexes: Microfoundations and Systemic Effects.’ Global Governance 19(1): 119–130. www-jstor-org.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/stable/pdf/24526245.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geis, Anna, Clément, Maeve, and Pfeifer, Hanna (eds). 2021. Armed Non-state Actors and the Politics of Recognition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelpi, Christopher 1997. ‘Crime and Punishment. The Role of Norms in Crisis Bargaining.’ The American Political Science Review 91(2): 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geneva Call. 2022. ‘Their Words: Directory of Armed Non-State Actor Humanitarian Commitments.’ https://theirwords.org/.Google Scholar
Gholiagha, Sassan 2022. The Humanisation of Global Politics: International Criminal Law, the Responsibility to Protect, and Drones. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gholiagha, Sassan and Sienknecht, Mitja 2023. ‘Between (ir)Responsibility and (in)Appropriateness: Conceptualizing Norm-related State Behaviour in the Russian wçar against Ukraine.’ Global Constitutionalism: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gholiagha, Sassan, Holzscheiter, Anna, and Liese, Andrea 2020. ‘Activating Norm Collisions: Interface Conflicts in International Drug Control.’ Global Constitutionalism – Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law 9(2): 290–317.Google Scholar
Gillies, Alexandra 2010. ‘Reputational Concerns and the Emergence of Oil Sector Transparency as an International Norm.’ International Studies Quarterly 54(1): 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glanville, Luke 2006. ‘Norms, Interests and Humanitarian Intervention.’ Global Change, Peace and Security 18: 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GNWP. 2020. ‘COVID-19 and Women, Peace and Security Database.’ In GNWP Resources. https://gnwp.org/resources/covid-19-wps-database/.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary 2003. International Norms and Decisionmaking: A Punctuated Equilibrium Model. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith., and Keohane, Robert O. 1993. ‘Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework.’ In Goldstein, J., and Keohane, R. O. (eds). Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, 3–30. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, Daniel 2006. Imperial Citizenship: Empire and the Question of Belonging. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Government of Canada. 2021. ‘The Downing of Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752: Factual Analysis.’ June. www.international.gc.ca/gac-amc/assets/pdfs/publications/flight-vol-ps752/factual_analysis-analyse_faits-en.pdf.Google Scholar
Graf-Brugère, Anne-Laurence 2013. ‘A Lex Favorabilis? Resolving Norm Conflicts between Human Rights Law and Humanitarian Law.’ In Kolb, R., and Gaggioli, G. (eds). Research Handbook on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, 251–270. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Grant, Thomas D. 2015. ‘Current Developments – Annexation of Crimea.’ American Journal of International Law 109(1): 68–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gready, Paul 2011. The Era of Transitional Justice: The Aftermath of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa and Beyond. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grillot, Suzette R. 2011. ‘Global Gun Control. Examining the Consequences of Competing International Norms.’ Global Governance 17(4): 539–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grovogui, Siba N. 2001. ‘Sovereignty in Africa: Quasi-Statehood and Other Myths in International Theory.’ In Dunn, K., and Shaw, T. (eds). Africa’s Challenge to International Relations Theory, 29–45. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumuchian, Marie-Louise, Smith-Spark, Laura, and Formanek, Ingird 2014. ‘Gunmen Seize Parliament in Ukraine’s Crimea, Raise Russian Flag.’ CNN, 27 February. https://edition.cnn.com/2014/02/27/world/europe/ukraine-politics/index.html.Google Scholar
Gunitsky, Seva 2013. ‘Complexity and Theories of Change in International Politics.’ International Theory 5(1): 35–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971913000110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurowitz, Amy 1999. ‘Mobilizing International Norms: Domestic Actors, Immigrants, and the Japanese State.’ World Politics 51(3): 413–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guterres, António 2016. Challenges and Opportunities for the United Nations. Secretary-General Vision Statement, Lisbon, 4 April.Google Scholar
Gutner, T. 2002. Banking on the Environment: Multilateral Development Banks and Their Environmental Performance in Central and Eastern Europe. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. 2010. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1980. ‘Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes.’ World Politics 32(3): 357–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M., and Haas, Ernst B. 2002. ‘Pragmatic Constructivism and the Study of International Institutions.’ Millennium. Journal of International Studies 31(3), 573–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadden, Jennifer 2018. ‘The Relational Sources of Advocacy Strategies: Comparative Evidence from the European and U.S. Climate Change Sectors.’ Policy Studies Journal 46(2): 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadden, Jennifer, and Seybert, Lucia A. 2016. ‘What’s in a Norm? Mapping the Norm Definition Process in the Debate on Sustainable Development.’ Global Governance 22(2): 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emile M. 2005. ‘Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression.’ International Organization 59(3): 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emile M. 2008. ‘Sticks and Stones. Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcement Problem.’ International Organization 62: 689–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emile M., and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru 2005. ‘Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises.’ American Journal of Sociology 110(5): 1373–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emile M., Kahler, Miles, and Montgomery, Alexander H. 2009. ‘Network Analysis for International Relations.’ International Organization 63(3): 559–592. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagan, John 2003. Justice in the Balkans. Prosecuting War Crimes in The Hague Tribunal. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Taylor, Rosemary R. 1996. ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.’ Political Studies 44(5): 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terrence C., and Shaffer, George 2015. ‘Researching Transnational Legal Orders.’ In Haliday, T. C., and Shaffer, G (eds). Transnational Legal Orders, 475–528. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terrence C., Pacewicz, Josh, and Block-Lieb, Susan 2013. ‘Who Governs? Delegations in Global Trade Lawmaking.’ Regulation and Governance 7: 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Lene 2015. ‘How Images Make World Politics: International Icons and the Case of Abu Ghraib.’ Review of International Studies 41(2): 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes, and Vetterlein, , Antje (eds). 2020. The Rise of Responsibility in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes, and Vetterlein, , Antje (eds). 2021. Responsibility in International Relations Theories. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hari, Kurniawan 2013. ‘Indonesia to Promote Reconciliation in Rakhine.’ The Jakarta Post. 9 January.Google Scholar
Harlan, Chico 2018. ‘The Retreat of Rescue Ships from the Mediterranean is a Sign of Changing Odds for Migrants.’ The Washington Post, 16 June (Washington, DC). www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/the-retreat-of-rescue-ships-from-the-mediterranean-is-a-sign-of-changing-odds-for-migrants/2018/06/15/099b74f0-6e61-11e8-b4d8-eaf78d4c544c_story.html.Google Scholar
Harrington, Joanna 2017. ‘The Working Methods of the United Nations Security Council: Maintaining the Implementation of Change.’ International and Comparative Law Quarterly 66(1): 39–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Neil E. 2006. Complexity in World Politics: Concepts and Methods of a New Paradigm. Albany: SUNY Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haugen, Hans M. 2007. ‘Patent Rights and Human Rights: Exploring Their Relationships.’ The Journal of World Intellectual Property 10(2): 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan 2017. ‘Introduction. Symposium on Contestation and International Relations.’ Polity 49(1): 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan 2018. ‘Social Constructivism and International Ethics.’ In Steele, Brent J., and Heinze, Eric A. (eds). Routledge Handbook on Ethics in International Relations, 116–130. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan, and Duvall, Robert 2017. ‘Challenges of an Agonistic Constructivism for International Relations: Comments on Antje Wiener’s Theory of Contestation.’ Polity 49(1): 156–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haverland, Markus, and Yanow, Dvora 2012. ‘A Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Public Administration Research Universe: Surviving Conversations on Methodologies and Methods.’ Public Administration Review 72(3): 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, Naomi 2020. ‘A “Pedagogy of Discomfort”? Experiential Learning and Conflict Analysis in Israel-Palestine.’ International Studies Perspectives 21(7): 78–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. 2003. ‘Human Rights and Intellectual Property: Conflict or Coexistence?’ Minnesota Intellectual Property Review 5(1): 47–61.Google Scholar
Heller, Kevin Jon 2022. ‘Options for Prosecuting Russian Aggression Against Ukraine: A Critical Analysis.’ Journal of Genocide Research, published online 6 July.Google Scholar
Heller, Regina, Kahl, Martin, and Pisoiu, Daniela 2012. ‘The “Dark” Side of Normative Argumentation: The Case of Counterterrorism Policy.’ Global Constitutionalism – Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law 1(2): 278–312.Google Scholar
Hendrix, Cullen S., and Wong, Wendy H. 2013. ‘When Is the Pen Truly Mighty? Regime Type and the Efficacy of Naming and Shaming in Curbing Human Rights Abuses.’ British Journal of Political Science 43(3): 651–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, C. Randall 2017. Tangled Governance: International Regime Complexity, the Troika, and the Euro Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, C. Randall 2019. ‘Regime Complexity and the Organisations of Crisis and Development Finance.’ Development and Change 50(1): 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, Gleider 2017. ‘The Responsibility of the International Legal Academic: Situating the Grammarian within the “Invisible College”.’ In D’Aspremont, J., Gazzini, T., Nollkaemper, A., and Werner, W. (eds). International Law as a Profession, 160–188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertogh, Mark, and Kirkham, Richard 2018. ‘The Ombudsman and Administrative Justice: From Promise to Performance.’ In Hertogh, M., and Kirkham, R. (eds). Research Handbook on the Ombudsman, 1–15. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hevener, Natalie K. 1983. International Law and the Status of Women. Nashville: Westview Publishing.Google Scholar
Hilde, Thomas C. 2012. ‘Uncertainty and the Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Deliberation in Climate Change Adaptation.’ Democratization 19(5): 889–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Christopher 2003. The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hill, Felicity, Aboitiz, Mikele, and Poehlman-Doumbouya, Sara 2003. ‘Nongovernmental Organizations’ Role in the Buildup and Implementation of Security Council Resolution 1325.’ Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(4): 1255–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie R. 1983. The Managed Heart. Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie R. 2004. ‘What’s in a Word? Torture.’ New York Times, 23 May. www.nytimes.com/2004/05/23/opinion/what-s-in-a-word-torture.html.Google Scholar
Hofferberth, Matthias, and Weber, Christian 2015. ‘Lost in Translation: A Critique of Constructivist Norm Research.’ Journal of International Relations and Development 18(1): 75–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Matthew J. 2009. ‘Is Constructivist Ethics an Oxymoron?’ International Studies Review 11(2): 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofius, Maren 2016. ‘Community at the Border or the Boundaries of Community? The Case of EU Field Diplomats.’ Review of International Studies 42(5): 939–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofius, Maren 2020. ‘Towards a “Theory of the Gap”: Addressing the Relationship between Practice and Theory.’ Global Constitutionalism 9(1): 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofius, Maren, Wilkens, Jan, Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes, and Gholiagha, Sassan 2014. ‘Den Schleier lichten? Kritische Normenforschung, Freiheit und Gleichberechtigung im Kontext des “Arabischen Frühlings”.’ Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 21(2): 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Marcus, and Wheeler, Nicholas J. 2020. ‘Social Bonding in Diplomacy.’ International Theory 12(1): 133–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtermann, Jakob v. H., and Madsen, Mikael R. 2015. ‘European New Legal Realism and International Law: How to Male International Law Intelligible.’ Leiden Journal of International Law 28(2): 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holthaus, Leonie, and Steffek, Jens. 2020. ‘Ideologies of International Organisation: Exploring the Trading Zones between Theory and Practice.’ In Martill, B., and Schindler, S. (eds). Theory as Ideology in International Relations: The Politics of Knowledge, 187–208. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzscheiter, Anna, Gholiagha, Sassan, and Liese, Andrea 2022. ‘Advocacy Coalition Constellations and Norm Collisions: Insights from International Drug Control, Human Trafficking, and Child Labour.’ Global Society 36(1): 25–48.Google Scholar
Hookway, Christopher 2013. ‘“The Principle of Peirce” and the Origins of Pragmatism.’ In Malachowski, A. (ed). The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism, 17–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, Joseph 2012. ‘Reconstructing Responsibility and Moral Agency in World Politics.’ International Theory 4(2): 233–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopf, Ted 1998. ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory.’ International Security 23(1): 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Weldon, Laurel S. 2012. ‘The Civic Origins of Progressive Policy Change: Combating Violence against Women in Global Perspective, 1975–2005.’ American Political Science Review 106(3): 548–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Melanie M., Krook, Mona L., and Paxton, Pamela 2015. ‘Transnational Women’s Activism and the Global Diffusion of Gender Quotas.’ International Studies Quarterly 59(2): 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huijstee, M., Genovese, K., Daniel, C., and Singh, S. 2016. Glass Half Full: The State of Accountability in Development Finance. Report by 11 NGOs. 19 December. www.somo.nl/glass-half-full-2/.Google Scholar
Human Rights Council. 2015. ‘The Role of Prevention in the Promotion and Prevention of Human Rights.’ Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 16 July. A/HRC/30/20.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2001. ‘Torture Not an Option.’ Human Rights Watch Issue Backgrounder, 19 November.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2008. ‘Burma: China Should Push to Get Aid In.’ In Human Rights Watch News, 10 May. www.hrw.org/news/2008/05/09/burma-china-should-push-get-aid.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2017. ‘The Costs of International Advocacy: China’s Interference in United Nations Human Rights Mechanisms.’ Report, 5 September.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2020. ‘Human Rights Dimensions of COVID-19 Response.’ 19 March. www.hrw.org/news/2020/03/19/human-rights-dimensions-covid-19-response.Google Scholar
Hunt, Charles T. 2016. ‘Emerging Powers and the Responsibility to Protect: Non-Linear Norm Dynamics in Complex International Society.’ Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29(2): 761–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2016.1166478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Charles T, and Orchard, Phil 2020. ‘Consolidation and Contestation of the Responsibility to Protect.’ In Hunt, C. T., and Orchard, P. (eds). Constructing the Responsibility to Protect, 1–27. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Paul 2017. ‘Configuring the UN Human Rights system in the “Era of Implementation”: Mainland and Archipelago.’ Human Rights Quarterly. 39(3): 489–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, D. 2008. ‘Civil Society Networks and the Development of Environmental Standards at International Financial Institutions.’ Chicago Journal of International Law 8(2): 437–477.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian 1999. ‘Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics.’ International Organization 53(2): 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew 2002. ‘Norms and Ethics in International Relations.’ In Carlesnaes, W., Risse, T., Simmons, B. (eds). Handbook of International Relations, 57–84. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Emma 2010. ‘Trauma and the Politics of Emotions: Constituting Identity, Security and Community after the Bali Bombing.’ International Relations 24: 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, Emma 2016. Affective Communities in World Politics. Collective Emotions after Trauma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Susan D. 2011. ‘Catch Us if You Can: Election Monitoring and International Norm Diffusion.’ American Journal of Political Science 55(2): 356–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICAO. 2021. ‘ICAO Council Condemns Belarus over 2021 Ryanair Flight Bomb Threat and Diversion.’ 19 July. www.icao.int/Newsroom/Pages/ICAO-Council-strongly-condemns-Belarus-over-2021-Ryanair-flight-bomb-threat-and-diversion.aspx.Google Scholar
ICC. 2022. ‘Statement of ICC Prosecutor, Karim A.A. Khan QC, on the Situation in Ukraine: “I have decided to proceed with opening an investigation”.’ 28 February. www.icc-cpi.int/news/statement-icc-prosecutor-karim-aa-khan-qc-situation-ukraine-i-have-decided-proceed-opening.Google Scholar
ICCPR. 1966. ‘International Convention on Civial and Polical Rights.’ www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights (173 ratifications as of 7 October 2022). https://indicators.ohchr.org.Google Scholar
ICERD. 1965. ‘International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (182 ratifications as of 7 October 2022).’ https://indicators.ohchr.org/%29\t”_blank.Google Scholar
ICESCR. 1966. ‘International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (171 ratifications as of 7 October 2022).’ https://indicators.ohchr.org.Google Scholar
ICRW 2019. Toward a Feminist Foreign Policy in the United States. Discussion Draft, October. Washington, DC: International Centre for Research on Women.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, John G., and Kupchan, Charles A., 1990. ‘Socialization and Hegemonic Power.’ International Organization, 44(3): 283–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILC Study Group. 2006. ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law; Conclusions of the Work of the Study Group (A/CN.4/L.702).’ 18 July.Google Scholar
Ilgit, Asli, and Prakash, Deepa 2019. ‘Making Human Rights Emotional: A Research Agenda to Recover Shame in “Naming and Shaming.”’ Political Psychology 40(6): 1297–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immerwahr, Daniel 2019. How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States. New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Inayatullah, Naeem, and Blaney, David 2004. International Relations and the Problem of Difference. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Independent International Commission on Kosovo. 2000. The Kosovo Report: Conflict, International Response, Lessons Learned: A Report from the Independent International Commission on Kosovo. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inspection Panel. 2009. Accountability at the World Bank: The Inspection Panel at 15 Years. Washington, DC: The Inspection Panel, World Bank.Google Scholar
International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect. 2020. www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/.Google Scholar
International Commission of Jurists. 2022. Options for the Establishment of a Standing Independent Investigative Mechanism (SIIM). Geneva: International Commission of Jurists.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. 2007. Report on the Treatment of Fourteen “High Value Detainees” in CIA Custody. Regional Delegation for United States and Canada. 14 February, Geneva.Google Scholar
International Court of Justice (ICJ). 2022. ‘Press Release: Ukraine Institutes Proceedings against the Russian Federation and Requests the Court to Indicate Provisional Measures. No. 2022/4.’ 27 February.Google Scholar
International Finance Corporation. 2012a. ‘IFC Sustainability Framework: Policy and Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability, Access to Information Policy, Washington, DC, World Bank Group.’ www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/sustainability-at-ifc/policies-standards/ifcsustainabilityframework_2012.Google Scholar
International Finance Corporation. 2012b. The International Bill of Human Rights and IFC Sustainability Framework. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/sustainability-at-ifc/publications/ibhr_ifc_sustainability_framework.Google Scholar
Isachenkov, Vladimir 2014. ‘Putin Signs Treaty to Add Crimea to Map of Russia.’ AP NEWS, 18 March. https://apnews.com/article/ed0ea4d1515e4165949a156ed80c12e0.Google Scholar
IWDA. 2021. Introducing the Australian Feminist Foreign Policy Coalition. https://iwda.org.au/australian-feminist-foreign-policy-coalition/.Google Scholar
Jacob, Cecilia 2018. ‘From Norm Contestation to Norm Implementation: Recursivity and the Responsibility to Protect.’ Global Governance 24(3): 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, Cecilia 2020. ‘R2P as an Atrocity Prevention Framework: Concepts and Institutionalization at the Global Level.’ In Jacob, C., and Mennecke, M. (eds). Implementing the Responsibility to Protect: A Future Agenda, 16–33. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jacob, Cecilia 2021a. ‘Regulatory Contestation: Steering toward Consistency in International Norm Implementation.’ International Studies Review 23(4): 1349–1369. Online Advance, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, Cecilia 2021b. ‘Institutionalising Prevention at the UN: International Organisation Reform as a Site of Norm Contestation.’ Global Governance 27(2): 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, Cecilia 2021c. ‘The Status of Human Protection in International Law and Institutions: The United Nations Prevention and Protection Architecture.’ The Australian Year Book of International Law Online 8(1): 110–133.Google Scholar
Jakobi, Anja P., and Loges, Bastian 2021. ‘Urbanising Norms? Cities as Local Amplifiers in Global Norm Dynamics on HIV/AIDS Policies.’ Journal of International Relations and Development 25: 54–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jam v. IFC. 2019. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit No. 17–1011.Google Scholar
Jansson, Maria, and Eduards, Maud 2016. ‘The Politics of Gender in the UN Security Council Resolutions on Women, Peace and Security.’ International Feminist Journal of Politics 18(4): 590–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeff Wise. 2021. ‘Why Belarus Grounding of Ryanair Flight Broke International Law.’ New York Magazine Intelligencer, 24 May. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/05/belarus-grounding-of-ryanair-flight-broke-international-law.html.Google Scholar
Jepperson, Ronald L., Wendt, Alexander, and Katzenstein, Peter 1996. ‘Norms, Identity and Culture in National Security.’ In Katzenstein, P. (ed). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, 33–75. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert 1997. ‘System Effects.’ In Jervis, R. (ed). System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life, 29–91. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jetschke, Anja, and Liese, Andrea 2013. ‘The Power of Human Rights a Decade After.’ In Risse, T., Ropp, S. C., and Sikkink, K. (eds). The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance, 43–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joachim, Jutta M. 2008. Agenda Setting, the UN, and NGOs: Gender Violence and Reproductive Rights. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Joachim, Jutta M., and Schneiker, Andrea 2012. ‘Changing Discourses, Changing Practices? Gender Mainstreaming and Security.’ Comparative European Politics 10(5): 528–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson-Nogués, Elisabeth, Vlaskamp, Martijn C., and Barbé, , Esther (eds). 2020. European Union Contested: Foreign Policy in a New Global Context. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Lyndon B. 1968. ‘Special Message to the Senate Transmitting the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.’ The American Presidency Project. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/237750.Google Scholar
Johnson, Melissa, Davies, Sara E., True, Jacqui, and Morales-Riveros, Yolanda 2023. ‘“Patriarchal Reset” in the Asia Pacific during COVID-19: The Impacts on Women’s Security and Rights.’ Pacific Review 36(3): 603–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain 2001. ‘Treating International Institutions as Social Environments.’ International Studies Quarterly 45(4), 487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Ian 2011. The Power of Deliberation: International Law, Politics and Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jose, Betcy 2017. ‘Not Completely the New Normal: How Human Rights Watch Tried to Suppress the Targeted Killing Norm.’ Contemporary Security Policy 38(2): 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Sara 2011. Blame it on the WTO?: A Human Rights Critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurkovich, Michele 2020. ‘What Isn’t a Norm? Redefining the Conceptual Boundaries of “Norms” in the Human Rights Literature.’ International Studies Review 22(3): 693–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jörg 2005. ‘Structural Uncertainty through Neo-Kelsenian Consistency: Conflicts of Norms in International Law.’ Papers of the European Society of International Law 1–25.Google Scholar
Kardam, Nüket 2004. ‘The Emerging Global Gender Equality Regime from Neoliberal and Constructivist Perspectives in International Relations.’ International Feminist Journal of Politics 6(1): 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsrud, John 2019. ‘For the Greater Good?: “Good States” Turning UN Peacekeeping towards Counterterrorism.’ International Journal. Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Anaylsis 74(1): 65–83.Google Scholar
Karmanau, Yuras, and Baetz, Juergen 2014. ‘Crimea to Vote to Split from Ukraine, Join Russia.’ AP NEWS, 7 March. www.yahoo.com/entertainment/news/crimea-vote-split-ukraine-join-russia-233303911.html?guccounter=1.Google Scholar
Katsumata, Hiro 2009. ‘ASEAN and Human Rights: Resisting Western Pressure or Emulating the West?’ Pacific Review 5: 619–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter 1996. ‘Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security.’ In Katzesntein, P. (ed). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, 1–32. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Craig M. 2017. Grassroots Global Governance: Local Watershed Management Experiments and the Evolution of Sustainable Development. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauppi, Niilo, and Madsen, Mikael R. 2014. ‘Fields of Global Governance: How Transnational Power Elites Can Make Global Governance Intelligible.’ International Political Sociology 8(3): 324–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavalski, Emilian 2007. ‘The Fifth Debate and the Emergence of Complex International Relations Theory: Notes on the Application of Complexity Theory to the Study of International Life.’ Cambridge Review of International Affairs 20(36): 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570701574154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Vincent C. 2014. ‘Contesting the International Illegitimacy of Torture: The Bush Administration’s Failure to Legitimate Its Preferences within International Society.’ The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kellerman, Miles 2019. ‘The Proliferation of the Multilateral Development Banks.’ Review of International Organization 14: 107–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Judith G. 2008. ‘Assessing the Complex Evolution of Norms: The Rise of International Election Monitoring.’ International Organization 62(2): 221–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A. 2015. ‘Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations.’ American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, David 2016. A World of Struggle: How Power, Law, and Expertise Shape Global Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Edward M. 1981. ‘Refugee Act of 1980.’ International Migration Review 15(1–2): 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khundee, Supalak 2007. ‘Thai Role Gets UK Backing Britain Tells Nitya, It Understands Kingdom’s Unique Circumstances.’ The Nation, 30 September.Google Scholar
Kim, Hun J., and Sharman, Jason C. 2014. ‘Accounts and Accountability: Corruption, Human Rights and Individual Accountability Norms.’ International Organization 68(2): 417–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Rakhyun E. 2020. ‘Is Global Governance Fragmented, Polycentric, or Complex? The State of the Art of the Network Approach.’ International Studies Review 22(4): 903–931. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Desmond 2000. Making Americans: Immigration, Race, and the Origins of the Diverse Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict 2010. ‘The International Legal Order. International Law and Justice.’ Working Paper 20003/1, History and Theory of International Law Series. Institute for International Law and Justice, New York University.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico, and Stewart, Richard B. 2005. ‘Emergence of Global Administrative Law.’ Law and Contemporary Problems 68(15): 15–62.Google Scholar
Kirby, Paul, and Shepherd, Laura J. 2016. ‘The Futures Past of the Women, Peace and Security Agenda.’ International Affairs 92(2): 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, Paul, and Shepherd, Laura J. 2020. ‘Women, Peace, and Security: Mapping the (Re) Production of a Policy Ecosystem.’ Journal of Global Security Studies 6(3): 1–25.Google Scholar
Kirgis, Frederic L. 1987. ‘Custom on a Sliding Scale.’ American Journal of International Law 81(1): 146–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kistler, Deborah, Thöni, Christian, and Welzel, Christian 2017. ‘Survey Response and Observed Behavior: Emancipative and Secular Values Predict Prosocial Behaviors.’ Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 48(4): 461–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaaren, Jonathan 2000. ‘Post-Apartheid Citizenship in South Africa.’ In Aleinikoff, A. T., and Klusmeyer, D. (eds). From Migrants to Citizens: Membership in a Changing World, 221–252. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne, and Ulfstein, Geir 2011. The Constitutionalization of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kleinlein, Thomas 2023. ‘Matters of Interpretation: How to Conceptualize and Evaluate Change of Norms and Values in the International Legal Order.’ In Krieger, H., and Liese, A. (eds). Tracing Value Change in the International Legal Order: Perspectives from Legal and Political Science, 64–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, Audie 1995a. Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie 1995b. ‘Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions against South Africa.’ International Organization 49(3): 451–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, Audie 2013. Migration and National Identity in South Africa, 1860–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, Audie 2017. ‘Racial Inequality.’ In Dunne, T., and Reus-Smit, C. (eds). Globalization of International Society, 362–379. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, Audie 2018. ‘The Power of Prejudice: The Race Gap in Constructivist International Relations Scholarship.’ In Bertucci, M., Hayes, J., and James, P. (eds). Constructivism and Its Critics, 87–102. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie, and Boehme, Franziska 2022. A Genealogy of Apartheid in International Law. Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Meeting, Nashville.Google Scholar
Kornprobst, Markus, and Senn, Martin 2016. ‘Introduction: Background Ideas in International Relations.’ The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18(2): 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koschut, Simon 2014. ‘Emotional (Security) Communities: The Significance of Emotion Norms in Inter-Allied Conflict Management.’ Review of International Studies 40: 533–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koschut, Simon 2018. ‘The Power of (Emotion) Words. On the Importance of Emotions for Discourse Analysis in IR.’ Journal of International Relations and Development 21(3): 495–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti 2007. ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics.’ Modern Law Review 70(1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowert, Paul A. 2012. ‘Completing the Ideational Triangle: Identity, Choice and Obligation in International Relations.’ In: Shannon, V. P., and Kowert, P. A. (eds). Psychology and Constructivism in International Relations: An Ideational Alliance, 30–53. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Krain, Matthew 2012. ‘“J’accuse”! Does Naming and Shaming Perpetrators Reduce the Severity of Genocides or Politicides?’ International Studies Quarterly 56(3): 574–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Paul A. 2006. The Blood of Government: Race, Empire, the United States, and the Philippines. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Krampf, Arie 2013. ‘The Life Cycles of Competing Policy Norms. Localizing European and Developmental Central Banking Ideas.’ KFG The Transformative Power of Europe, Working Paper No. 49 (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich 1986. ‘Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality: An Inquiry into the Formation of the State System.’ World Politics 39(1): 27–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich 1991. Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich 1993. ‘The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of Realpolitik without Politics.’ Review of International Studies 19(1): 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich, and Ruggie, John G. 1986. International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State.’ International Organization 40(4): 753–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, Ronald R., and Jackson, Patrick T. 2007. ‘Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric.’ European Journal of International Relations 13(1): 35–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreft, Anne-Kathrin 2017. ‘The Gender Mainstreaming Gap: Security Council Resolution 1325 and UN Peacekeeping Mandates.” International Peacekeeping 24(1): 132–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian 2019. ‘China vs the WTO: A Behavioural Norm Conflict in the SARS Crisis.’ International Affairs 95(3): 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian, and Zürn, Michael 2020. ‘After Fragmentation: Norm Collisions, Interface Conflicts, and Conflict Management.’ Global Constitutionalism 9(2): 241–267. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381719000315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Heike, and Liese, Andrea 2019. ‘A Metamorphosis of International Law? – Value Changes in the International Legal Order from the Perspectives of Legal and Political Science.’ KFG Working Paper Series No. 27. Berlin Potsdam Research Group ‘The International Rule of Law – Rise or Decline?’ Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. https://d-nb.info/1217813039/34.Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico 2005. ‘International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order.’ European Journal of International Law 16(3): 369–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, Nico 2014. ‘The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods.’ American Journal of International Law 198(1): 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, Nico, and Kingsbury, Benedict 2006. ‘Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order.’ European Journal of International Law. 17(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, Nico, Corradini, Francesco, and Reimers, Lucy L. 2020. ‘Order at the Margins: The Legal Construction of Interface Conflicts over Time.’ Global Constitutionalism 9(2): 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381719000327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona L. 2011. ‘Gendering Comparative Politics: Achievements and Challenges.’ Politics & Gender 7(1): 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona L., and True, Jacqui 2012. ‘Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality.’ European Journal of International Relations, 18(1): 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, Shashank P., and Rose, Cecily 2014. ‘A Study of Lawyers Appearing before the International Court of Justice, 1999–2012.’ European Journal of International Law 25(3): 893–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurowska, Xymena 2019. The Politics of Cyber Norms: Beyond Norm Construction towards Strategic Narrative Contestation. Brussels and Paris: EU Cyber Direct/EU Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
Laden, Anthony S., and Owen, David (eds). 2007. Multiculturalism and Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A., Martin, Lisa L., and Risse, Thomas 2021. ‘Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization.’ International Organization 75(2): 225–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A., and Wiener, Antje 2023. ‘Understanding Deep Contestation.’ In Wiener, A., Lake, D. A., and Risse, T. (eds). Deep Contestation of International Orders. Oxford: Oxford University Press (in preparation).Google Scholar
Lake, Marilyn, and Reynolds, Henry 2008. Drawing the Global Colour Line. White Men’s Countries and the International Challenge of Racial Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantis, Jeff S. 2016. ‘Agentic Constructivism and the Proliferation Security Initiative: Modeling Norm Change.’ Cooperation and Conflict 51(3): 384–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantis, Jeff S. and Wunderlich, Carmen 2018. ‘Resiliency Dynamics of Norm Clusters: Norm Contestation and International Cooperation.’ Review of International Studies 44(3): 570–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantis, Jeff S. and Wunderlich, Carmen 2022. ‘Reevaluating Constructivist Norm Theory: A Three-Dimensional Norms Research Program.’ International Studies Review online first.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Estelle T. 2006. Paper Families: Identity, Immigration Administration, and Chinese Exclusion. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laughland, Oliver, Urquhart, Conal, and Yuhas, Alan 2014. ‘Crimea Referendum: Early Results Indicate ‘Landslide’ for Secession – As It Happened.’ The Guardian, 16 March. www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/16/crimea-referendum-polls-open-live.Google Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Wenger, Etienne 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavelle, K. 2011. Legislating International Organisation: The US Congress, the IMF and the World Bank. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leander, Anna 2008. ‘Thinking Tools.’ In Klotz, A., and Prakash, D. (eds). Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, 11–27. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebovic, James H., and Voeten, Erik 2006. ‘The Politics of Shame. The Condemnation of Country Human Rights Practices in the UNCHR.’ International Studies Quarterly 50(4): 861–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard N., and Risse-Kappen, Thomas 1995. (eds). International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lechner, Silviya, and Frost, Mervyn. 2018. Practice Theory and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W. 1997. ‘Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the ‘Failure’ of Internationalism.’ International Organization 51(1): 31–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W. 2020. ‘The Transformation of Policy Ideas.’ American Journal of Political Science 44(3): 419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenton, Timothy M., Rockström, Johan, Gaffney, Owen, Rahmstorf, Stefan, Richardson, Katherine, Steffen, Will, and Schellnhuber, Hans J. 2019. ‘Climate Tipping Points – Too Risky to Bet Against.’ Nature 575: 592–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenz, Tobias, and Viola, Lora A. 2017. ‘Legitimacy and Institutional Change in International Organizations: A Cognitive Approach.’ Review of International Studies 43(5): 939–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesch, Max, and Zimmermann, Lisbeth. 2023. ‘There’s Life in the Old Dog Yet: Assessing the Strength of the International Torture Prohibition.’ In Krieger, H., and Liese, A. (eds). Tracing Value Change in the International Legal Order: Perspectives from Legal and Political Science, 100–117. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesser, Jeff 2013. Immigration, Ethnicity, and National Identity in Brazil, 1808 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, K. 2012. ‘Citizen-Driven Accountability for Sustainable Development: Giving Affected People a Voice 20 Years On.’ A Paper by the Independent Accountability Mechanisms Network. Accessed: 7 July 2016. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTINSPECTIONPANEL/Resources/Rio20_IAMs_Contribution.pdf.Google Scholar
Liebowitz, Debra J., and Zwingel, Susanne 2014. ‘Gender Equality Oversimplified: Using CEDAW to Counter the Measurement Obsession.’ International Studies Review 16: 362–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liese, Andrea 2009. ‘Exceptional Necessity: How Liberal Democracies Contest the Prohibition of Torture and Ill-treatment When Countering Terrorism.’ Journal of International Law and International Relations 5(1): 17–47.Google Scholar
Lindroos, Anja 2005. ‘Addressing Norm Conflicts in a Fragmented Legal System: The Doctrine of Lex Specialis.’ The Nordic Journal of International Law 74: 27–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liste, Philip 2020. ‘The Workings of Power in Transnational Law.’ TLI Think! Paper 24/2020. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3756985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Hin-Y., and Kinsey, Christopher 2018. ‘Challenging the Strength of the Antimercenary Norm.’ Journal of Global Security Studies 3(1): 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locher, Birgit, and Prügl, Elisabeth 2001. ‘Feminism and Constructivism: Worlds Apart or Sharing the Middle Ground?’ International Studies Quarterly 45(1): 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Sidney X. 2019. The Making of Japanese Settler Colonialism: Malthusianism and Trans-Pacific Migration, 1868–1961. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukas, Karin, Linder, Barbara, Kutrzeba, Astrid, and Sprenger, Claudia 2016. Corporate Accountability: The Role and Impact of Non-Judicial Grievance. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Cecilia 1999. Beyond Appeasement: Interpreting Interwar Peace Movements in World Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, Gene M. 1989. ‘In Search of Racial Equality: The Elimination of Racial Discrimination.’ In Taylor, P., and Groom, A. J. R. (eds). Global Issues in the United Nations’ Framework, 75–115. New York: St. Martin’s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maass, Richard W. 2020. The Picky Eagle: How Democracy and Xenophobia Limited U.S. Territorial Expansion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, Kate, and Miller-Dawkins, May 2015. ‘Accountability in Public International Development Finance.’ Global Policy 6(4): 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madokoro, Daisuke 2015. ‘How the United Nations Secretary-General Promotes International Norms: Persuasion, Collective Legitimisation, and the Responsibility to Protect.’ Global Responsibility to Protect 7(1): 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00701003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Mikael R. 2010. La Genèse de l’Europe Des Droits de l’homme: Enjeux Juridiques et Stratégies d’Etat (France, Grande-Bretagne et Pays Scandinaves, 1945–1970). Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Madsen, Mikael R. 2011. ‘Reflexivity and the Construction of the International Object: The Case of Human Rights.’ International Political Sociology 5(3): 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Mikael R. 2014. ‘The International Judiciary as Transnational Power Elite.’ International Political Sociology 8(3): 332–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Mikael R. 2018. ‘Who Rules the World: The Educational Capital of the International Judiciary.’ UC Irvine Journal of International, Transnational, and Comparative Law 3: 97.Google Scholar
Madsen, Mikael R. 2021. ‘The Narrowing of the European Court of Human Rights: Legal Diplomacy, Situational Self-Restraint and the Transformation of the Court.’ The European Convention on Human Rights Law Review 2(2): 180–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Mikael R., Cebulak, Pola, and Wiebusch, Micha 2018. ‘Backlash against International Courts: Explaining the Forms and Patterns of Resistance to International Courts.’ International Journal of Law in Context 14(2): 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maliniak, Daniel, Peterson, Susan, Powers, Ryan, and Tierney, Michael J. 2017. ‘TRIP 2017 Faculty Survey.’ In Teaching, Research, and International Policy Project. Williamsburg, VA: Global Research Institute. https://trip.wm.edu/.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. 1998. ‘The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders.’ International Organization 52 (4): 943–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. 2004. ‘The Logic of Appropriateness.’ ARENA Centre for European Studies Working Paper 04/09. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Mares, Radu 2019, ‘Securing Human Rights through Risk-Management Methods: Breakthrough or Misalignment?’ Leiden Journal of International Law 32: 517–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margulis, Matias E. 2013. ‘The Regime Complex for Food Security. Implications for the Global Hunger Challenge.’ Global Governance 19(1): 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Catherine E., Ogden, Charles K., and Florence, Mary S. 1987. Militarism versus Feminism: Writings on Women and War. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa 2013. ‘Against Compliance.’ In Dunoff, J. L., and Pollack, M. A. (eds). Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, 591–610. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin De Almagro, María 2018. ‘Lost Boomerangs, the Rebound Effect and Transnational Advocacy Networks: A Discursive Approach to Norm Diffusion.’ Review of International Studies 44(4): 672–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin-Mazé, Médéric 2017. ‘Returning Struggles to the Practice Turn: How Were Bourdieu and Boltanski Lost in (Some) Translations and What to Do about It?’ International Political Sociology 11(2): 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Michael 2005. The New Accountability: Environmental Responsibility Across Borders. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Matejova, Miriam, Parker, Stefan, and Dauvergne, Peter 2018. ‘The Politics of Repressing Environmentalists as Agents of Foreign Influence.’ Australian Journal of International Affairs 72(2): 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattern, Janice Bially and Zarazol, Ayşe 2016. ‘Hierarchy in World Politics.’ International Organization 70(3): 623–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Diez, Thomas 2014. International Arbitration and Global Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Max Fisher. 2013. ‘Evo Morales’s Controversial Flight over Europe, Minute by Heavily Disputed Minute.’ The Washington Post, 3 July. www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/07/03/evo-morales-controversial-flight-over-europe-minute-by-heavily-disputed-minute/.Google Scholar
May, Christopher, and Winchester, Adam (eds). 2018. Handbook on the Rule of Law. London: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786432445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayblin, Lucy, and Turner, Joe 2021. Migration Studies and Colonialism. Cambridge and Malden: Polity.Google Scholar
MBT Website. 2021. AP Mine Ban Convention: Japan. www.apminebanconvention.org/states-parties-to-the-convention/japan/.Google Scholar
McAdam, Jane 2020. ‘Protecting People Displaced by the Impacts of Climate Change: The UN Human Rights Committee and the Principle of Non-Refoulement.’ American Journal of International Law 114(4): 708–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAfee, Noëlle 2004a. ‘Public Knowledge.’ Philosophy and Social Criticism 30(2): 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAfee, Noëlle 2004b. ‘Three Models of Democratic Deliberation.’ The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18(1): 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Helen, Sharp, Ingrid, Beers, Laura, Sluga, Glenda, Donert, Celia, and Pankhurst, Helen 2015. ‘Women, Peace and Transnational Activism: A Century On.’ History & Policy, 30 March. www.historyandpolicy.org/dialogues/discussions/women-peace-and-transnational-activism-a-century-on.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Tom 2016. ‘Donald Trump: I’d bring back “a hell of a lot worse than water boarding”.’ The Guardian, 7 February. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/06/donald-trump-waterboarding-republican-debate-torture.Google Scholar
McCourt, David M. 2016. ‘Practice Theory and Relationalism as the New Constructivism.’ International Studies Quarterly 60(3): 475–485. www.jstor.org/stable/44510089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCourt, David M. 2022. The New Constructivism in International Relations Theory: Bristol: Bristol University Press.Google Scholar
McIntyre, O., and Nanwani, S. (eds). 2020. The Practices of the Independent Accountability Mechanisms: Towards Good Governance in Development Finance. Leiden and Boston: Brill Njihoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, Catriona L. 2012. ‘Protecting the Silent Victim from Irregular Actors: Improving Non-State Compliance with the International Law of Environmental Protection in Armed Conflict.’ In ANU College of Law Research Paper No. 12–18, ANU College of Law Honours Thesis 2011, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2082599.Google Scholar
McKeown, Adam 2011. Melancholy Order: Asian Migration and the Globalization of Borders. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
McKeown, Ryder 2009. ‘Norm Regress: US Revisionism and the Slow Death of the Torture Norm.’ International Relations 23(1): 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117808100607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melucci, Alberto 1989. Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Mende, Janne 2022. ‘Norm Convergence and Collision in Regime Overlaps. Business and Human Rights in the UN and the EU.’ Globalizations 19(5): 725–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie 2019. ‘Uses and Abuses of Socio-Legal Studies.’ In Creutzfeld, N., Mason, M., and McConacchie, K. (eds). Routledge Handbook of Socio-Legal Theory and Methods, 35–57. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan 1996. ‘Approaching Emotion.’ Paper Presented at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan 2005. ‘Rationality and Psychology in International Politics.’ International Organization 59(1): 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meron, Theodor 2000. ‘The Humanization of Humanitarian Law.’ American Journal of International Law 94(2): 239–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meron, Theodor 2018. ‘Closing the Accountability Gap: Concrete Steps toward Ending Impunity for Atrocity Crimes.’ The American Society of International Law. 112(3): 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally E. 2006. ‘Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle.’ American Anthropologist 108(1): 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4710-4_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, Ralf, and Pauwelyn, Joost 2012. ‘Conflict of Norms or Conflict of Laws?: Different Techniques in the Fragmentation of Public International Law.’ Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 22(3): 349–376.Google Scholar
Milanović, Marko 2009. ‘A Norm Conflict Perspective on the Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law.’ Journal of Conflict and Security Law 14(3): 459–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milanović, Marko 2010. ‘Norm Conflicts, International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law.’ In Ben-Naftali, O. (ed). Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law, 1–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, John H., and Page, Scott E. 2007. Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Kurt, and Karp, David J. (eds). 2015. Human Rights Protection in Global Politics: Responsibilities of States and Non-State Actors. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minha, Donna 2020. ‘The Possibility of Prosecuting Corporations for Climate Crimes before the International Criminal Court: All Roads Lead to the Rome Statute?’ Michigan Journal of International Law 41(3): 491–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. 2021. ‘Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Zhao Lijian’s Regular Press Conference on May 25, 2021.’ www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/t1878445.shtml.Google Scholar
Mintrom, Michael, and True, Jacqui 2022. ‘COVID-19 as a Policy Window: Policy Entrepreneurs and the Prevention of Violence Against Women.’ Policy and Society 41(1): 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2000. Truth, Morality and Politics: Pragmatism and Deliberation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2004. ‘Making Disagreement Matter: Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy.’ The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18(1): 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Ronald B. 2002–19. ‘International Environmental Agreements Database Project (Version 2018.1).’ http://iea.uoregon.edu/.Google Scholar
Moghadam, Valentine M. 2005. Globalizing Women: Transnational Feminist Networks. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moses, Dirk A., Duranti, Marco, and Burke, Roland, (eds). 2020. Decolonization, Self-Determination, and the Rise of Global Human Rights Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Harald 2001. ‘Arguing, Bargaining, and All That: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations.’ European Journal of International Relations 10(3): 395–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner 2015. ‘Should the EU Protect Democracy and the Rule of Law inside Member States?’ European Law Journal 21(2): 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murcott, Melanie, and Webster, Emily 2020. ‘Litigation and Regulatory Governance in the Age of the Anthropocene: The Case of Fracking in the Karoo.’ Transnational Legal Theory 11(1–2): 144–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdie, Amanda M., and Davis, David R. 2012. ‘Shaming and Blaming: Using Events Data to Assess the Impact of Human Rights INGOs: Shaming and Blaming.’ International Studies Quarterly 56(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musa, Naim 2012. ‘Malaysia in ASEAN: Foreign Policy on Non-Traditional Security Issues.’ www.academia.edu/4219715/Malaysia_foreign_policy_after_mahathir_era.Google Scholar
Mwanza, Rosemary 2018. ‘Enhancing Accountability for Environmental Damage under International Law: Ecocide as a Legal Fulfilment of Ecological Integrity.’ Melbourne Journal of International Law 19(2): 586–613.Google Scholar
Nadelmann, Ethan A. 1990. ‘Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society.’ International Organization 44(4): 479–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naude Fourie, A. 2012. ‘The World Bank Inspection Panel’s Normative Potential: A Critical Assessment and a Restatement.’ Netherlands International Law Review LIX: 199–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NATO. 1999. ‘NATO’s Role in Relation to the Conflict in Kosovo.’ www.nato.int/kosovo/history.html.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1915. ‘Peace Talk Causes Suffrage Schism.’ 25 April. www.nytimes.com/1915/04/25/archives/peace-talk-causes-suffrage-schism-mrs-pankhurst-opposes-sending.html.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2004. ‘Transcript from Bush Speech on American Strategy in Iraq.’ 24 May 2004. www.nytimes.com/2004/05/24/politics/transcript-from-bush-speech-on-american-strategy-in-iraq.html.Google Scholar
Niemann, Holger, and Schillinger, Henrik 2017. ‘Contestation “All The Way Down”? The Grammar of Contestation in Norm Research.’ Review of International Studies 43(1): 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noor, Elina, and Qistina, T. N. 2017. ‘Great Power Rivalries, Domestic Politics and Malaysian Foreign Policy.’ Asian Security 13(3): 200–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuñez-Mietz, Fernando G., and García Iommi, Lucrecia 2017. ‘Can Transnational Norm Advocacy Undermine Internalization? Explaining Immunization Against LGBT Rights in Uganda.’ International Studies Quarterly 61(1): 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odello, Marco E., and Burke, Róisín 2016. ‘Between Immunity and Impunity: Peacekeeping and Sexual Abuses and Violence.’ The International Journal of Human Rights 20(6): 839–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2017. OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement in the Extractive Sector. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Ognibene, Lara, and Kariuki, Angela 2019. ‘Standards in the Procedural Rights of Multilateral Environmental Agreements.’ In Turner, S., Shelton, D., Razzaque, J., McIntyre, O., and May, J. (eds). Environmental Rights: The Development of Standards, 174–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, Arissa H. 2019. ‘Japanese War Brides and the Normalization of Family Unification after World War II.’ In Marinari, M., Hsu, M., and García, M. C. (eds). A Nation of Immigrants Reconsidered: US Society in an Age of Restriction, 1924–1965, 231–254. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Olivius, Elisabeth, Hedstrom, Jenny, and Zin Mar, Phyo 2021. ‘Feminist Peace or State Co-optation? The Women, Peace and Security Agenda in Myanmar.’ European Journal of Politics and Gender 5(1): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ollivier, Maurice (ed). 1954. The Colonial and Imperial Conferences from 1887 to 1937. Ottawa: Queen’s Printer.Google Scholar
O’Mahoney, Joseph 2014. ‘Rule Tensions and the Dynamics of Institutional Change: From “to the Victor go the Spoils” to the Stimson Doctrine.’ European Journal of International Relations 20(3): 834–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas 1994. ‘The Constitution of International Society.’ European Journal of International Law 5(1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejil.a035857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbach, Barak 2012. ‘What is Regulation?’ Yale Journal on Regulation Online 30(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
Orchard, Phil 2014. A Right to Flee: Refugees, States, and the Construction of International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orchard, Phil 2018. Protecting the Internally Displaced: Rhetoric and Reality. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orchard, Phil, and Wiener, Antje 2024. ‘Introduction.’ In Orchard, P., and Wiener, A. (eds). Contesting the World: Norm Research in Theory and Practice, 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2018. Multilateral Development Finance: Towards a New Pact on Multilateralism to Achieve the 2030 Agenda Together. Geneva: OECD.www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-topics/Multilateral-Development-Finance-Highlights-2018.pdf.Google Scholar
Orsini, Amandine, Le Prestre, Philippe, Haas, Peter M., Brosig, Malte, Pattberg, Philipp, Widerberg, Oscar, Gomez-Mera, Laura, et al. 2020. ‘Forum: Complex Systems and International Governance.’ International Studies Review 22(4): 1008–1038. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottawa Convention. 1997. ‘Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction.’ https://geneva-s3.unoda.org/static-unoda-site/pages/templates/anti-personnel-landmines-convention/APLC%2BEnglish.pdf.Google Scholar
Owen, David, and Tully, James 2007. ‘Redistribution and Recognition: Two Approaches.’ In Laden, A. S., and Owen, D. (eds). Multiculturalism and Political Theory, 265–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oxfam. 2020. ‘Small Group of Rich Nations Have Bought Up More Than Half the Future Supply of Leading COVID-19 Vaccine Contenders.’ Oxfam Press Releases, 17 September. www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/small-group-rich-nations-have-bought-more-half-future-supply-leading-covid-19.Google Scholar
Oxford Institute for Ethics, Law and Armed Conflict. n.d. ‘Anchoring Accountability for Mass Atrocities: A Project to Research and Advise on the Permanent Support Needed to Fulfil International Investigative mandates.’ www.elac.ox.ac.uk/research/anchoring-accountability-for-mass-atrocities/.Google Scholar
Paffenholz, Thania, Ross, Nick, Dixon, Steven, Shluchter, Anna-Lena, and True, Jacqui 2016. Making Women Count – Not Just Counting Women. New York: Inclusive Peace and Transition Initiative and UN Women.Google Scholar
Pahuja, Sundhya 2011. Decolonising International Law: Development, Economic Growth and the Politics of Universality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panebianco, Stefania 2016. ‘The Mediterranean Migration Crisis: Border Control versus Humanitarian Approaches.’ Global Affairs 2(4): 441–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panke, Diana, and Petersohn, Ulrich 2012. ‘Why International Norms Disappear Sometimes.’ European Journal of International Relations 18(4): 719–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panke, Diana, and Petersohn, Ulrich 2016. ‘Norm Challenges and Norm Death: The Inexplicable?’ Cooperation and Conflict 51: 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panke, Diana, and Petersohn, Ulrich 2017. ‘President Donald J. Trump: An Agent of Norm Death?’ International Journal 72(4): 572–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020702017740159.Google Scholar
Pantzerhielm, Laura, Holzscheiter, Anna, and Bahr, Thurid 2022. ‘Governing Effectively in a Complex World? How Metagovernance Norms and Changing Repertoires of Knowledge Shape International Organization Discourses on Institutional Order in Global Health.’ Cambridge Review of International Affairs 35(4): 592–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1678112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papanicolopulu, Irini 2016. ‘The Duty to Rescue at Sea, in Peacetime and in War: A General Overview.’ International Review of the Red Cross 98(2): 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappas, Gregory F. 2012. ‘What Would John Dewey Say about Deliberative Democracy and Democratic Experimentalism?’ Contemporary Pragmatism 9(2): 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, Roland 2020. ‘The Right to Dominate: How Old Ideas about Sovereignty Pose New Challenges for World Order.’ International Organization 74(3): 453–489. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Susan 2010. The World Bank Group and Environmentalists: Changing International Organisation Identities. London: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Park, Susan 2017. ‘Accountability as Justice for the Multilateral Development Banks? Borrower Opposition and Bank Avoidance to US Power and Influence.’ Review of International Political Economy 24(5): 776–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Susan 2020. Environmental Recourse at the Multilateral Development Banks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Susan 2022. The Good Hegemon: United States Power, Accountability as Justice, and the Multilateral Development Banks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Susan, and Vetterlein, Antje 2010. Owning Development: Creating Policy Norms in the IMF and the World Bank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Christine, and Braithwaite, John 2005. ‘Regulation.’ In Tushnet, M., and Cane, P. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies, 119–145. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine, Scott, Colin, Lacey, Nicola, and Braithwaite, John 2004. ‘Introduction.’ In Parker, C., Scott, C., Lacey, N., and Braithwaite, J. (eds). Regulating Law, 1–12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parnini, Syeda N. 2013. ‘The Crisis of the Rohingya as a Muslim Minority in Myanmar and Bilateral Relations with Bangladesh.’ Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 33(2): 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passoni, C., Rosenbaum, A., and Vermunt, E. 2016. Empowering the Inspection Panel: The Impact of the World Bank’s Safeguards Review. Report, New York University School of Law. www.iilj.org/publications/empowering-the-inspection-panel/.Google Scholar
Paul, Kathleen 1997. Whitewashing Britain: Race and Citizenship in the Postwar Era. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, T. V., Larson, Deborah W., and Wohlforth, , , William C. (eds). 2014. Status in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Jost 2003. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law. How WTO Law Relates to other Rules of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, Hughes, Melanie M., and Green, Jennifer L. 2006. ‘The International Women’s Movement and Women’s Political Representation, 1893–2003.’ American Sociological Review 71(6): 893–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Rodger A. 2001. ‘Persuasion, Frames and Norm Construction.’ European Journal of International Relations 7(1): 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, Jacqueline 2010. Science and Risk Regulation in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, Jacqueline, and Lin, Jolene 2019. ‘Transnational Climate Litigation: The Contribution of the Global South.’ American Journal of International Law 113(4): 679–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, Jacqueline, and Osofsky, Hari M. 2020. ‘Climate Change Litigation.’ Annual Review of Law and Social Science 16: 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1877. ‘The Fixation of Belief.’ Popular Science Monthly 12: 1–15. www.peirce.org/writings/p107.html.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1878. ‘How to Make Our Ideas Clear.’ Popular Science Monthly, January, 286–302. https://courses.media.mit.edu/2004spring/mas966/Peirce%201878%20Make%20Ideas%20Clear.pdf.Google Scholar
Peltner, Anne 2017. ‘Competing Norms and Foreign Policy Change: Humanitarian Intervention and British Foreign Policy.’ International Politics 54(6): 745–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percy, Sarah 2007. Mercenaries: The History of a Norm in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percy, Sarah 2019. ‘What Makes a Norm Robust: The Norm Against Female Combat.’ Journal of Global Security Studies 4(1): 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percy, Sarah, and Sandholtz, Wayne 2022. ‘Why Norms Rarely Die.’ European Journal of International Relations, September, Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661221126018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrova, Margarita H. 2019. ‘Naming and Praising in Humanitarian Norm Development.’ World Politics 71(3): 586–630. https://doi.org/10.1017/s004388711800031X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pienaar, Sara 1987. South Africa and International Relations between the Two World Wars. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl 1957. The Great Transformation. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
Ponthieu, Aurélie 2016. ‘Bounties not Bodies: Smugglers Profit from Sea Rescues Though No Clear Alternative Available.’ MSF Analysis. https://msf-analysis.org/bounties-not-bodies-smugglers-profit-sea-rescues-though-no-clear-alternative-available/.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2003. Law, Pragmatism and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, Samantha 2016. ‘Remarks at a UN Security Council Emergency Briefing on Syria.’ 13 December. https://usun.state.gov/remarks/7607.Google Scholar
Pramendorfer, Elisabeth 2020. ‘The Role of the Human Rights Council in Implementing the Responsibility to Protect.’ Global Responsibility to Protect 12(3): 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prantl, Jochen, and Nakano, Ryoko 2011. ‘Global Norm Diffusion in East Asia: How China and Japan Implement the Responsibility to Protect.’ International Relations 25(2): 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117811404450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Simon F. 2018. ‘Norm Transformation and the Institutionalization of Targeted Killing in the US.’ European Journal of International Relations 25(3): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066118812178.Google Scholar
Pratt, Simon F. 2020. ‘From Norms to Normative Configurations: A Pragmatist and Relational Approach to Theorizing Normativity in IR.’ International Theory 12(1): 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
President of Russia. 2014. Address by President of the Russian Federation. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20603.Google Scholar
Price, Richard M. 1997. The Chemical Weapons Taboo. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard M. 1998. ‘Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines.’ International Organization 52(3): 613–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard M. 2006. ‘Detecting Ideas and Their Effects.’ In Goodin, R. E., and Tilly, C. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, 252–265. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard M. (ed). 2008. Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard M., and Reus-Smit, Christian 1998. ‘Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism.’ European Journal of International Relations 4(3): 259–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard M., and Sikkink, Kathryn 2017. ‘From Micro to Neuro: Implications of Neuroscience and Moral Psychology for Research on International Norms.’ Memo for ISA Workshop ‘Taking Stock of the Past to Shape the Future of Norm Studies.’ Baltimore, 21 February.Google Scholar
Price, Richard M., and Sikkink, Kathryn 2021. International Norms, Moral Psychology, and Neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard M., and Tannenwald, Nina 1996. ‘Norms and Deterrence: The Nuclear and Chemical Weapons Taboos.’ In Katzenstein, P. (ed). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, 114–152. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Priest, Dana, and Gellman, Barton 2002. ‘US Decries Abuse but Defends Interrogations.’ The Washington Post, 26 December.Google Scholar
ProAsyl. 2013. ‘Pushed Back: Systematische Menschenrechtsverletzungen an den griechisch- türkischen See- und Landgrenzen.’ www.proasyl.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Summary_Faelle_Deutsch_Pushed_Back.pdf.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 2004. Ethics without Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Quirk, Joel 2011. The Anti-Slavery Project: From the Slave Trade to Human Trafficking. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Joel, and Vigneswaran, Darshan 2015. ‘Mobility Makes States.’ In Vigneswaran, D., and Quirk, J. (eds). Mobility Makes States: Migration and Power in Africa, 1–34. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Rajkovic, Nikolas, Aalberts, Tanja, and Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas 2016. ‘Introduction: Legality, Interdisciplinarity, and the Study of Practices.’ In Rajkovic, N., Aalberts, T., and Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (eds). The Power of Legality: Practices of International Law and Their Politics, 1–25. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, Jason 2013. America’s War on Terror: The State of the American Exception from Bush to Obama. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, Jason 2018. ‘What Should Be Done? Pragmatic Constructivist Ethics and the Responsibility to Protect.’ International Organization 72(1): 173–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, Jason 2023. On Global Learning. Pragmatic Constructivism, International Practice and the Challenge of Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, Bruno 2001. Crossing the 49th Parallel: Migration from Canada to the United States, 1900–1930. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos, Jennifer M. 2013. Changing Norms through Actions: The Evolution of Sovereignty. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, Stephen J. 2016. ‘Bridging the Hague-Geneva Divide.’ Intersections. Autumn/Winter: 11–13.Google Scholar
Ratti, Giovanni B. 2015. ‘Negation in Legislation.’ In Araszkiewicz, M., and Pleszka, K. (eds). Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking, 137–157. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal 2000. ‘Compliance & Effectiveness in International Regulatory Cooperation.’ Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 32(3): 387–440.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David G. 2004, ‘The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources.’ International Organization 58(2): 277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razzaque, J. 2019 ‘A Stock-Taking of FPIC Standards in International Environmental Law.’ In Turner, S., Shelton, D., Razzaque, J., McIntyre, O., and May, J. (eds). Environmental Rights: The Development of Standards, 195–221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, Jonas H., Allpress, Jesse A., and Brown, Rupert 2013. ‘Nie Wieder: Group-Based Emotions for In-Group Wrongdoing Affect Attitudes toward Unrelated Minorities: Never Again.’ Political Psychology 34(3): 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reike, Ruben, Sharma, Serena K., and Welsh, Jennifer M. 2015. ‘Conceptualizing the Responsibility to Prevent.’ In Sharma, S. K., and Welsh, J. M. (eds). The Responsibility to Prevent: Overcoming the Challenges of Atrocity Prevention, 21–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reiling, Carrie 2017. ‘Pragmatic Scepticism in Implementing the Women, Peace and Security Agenda.’ Global Affairs 3(4–5): 469–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiners, Nina 2022. Transnational Lawmaking Coalitions for Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reinold, Theresa, 2023. ‘The Prohibition on the Use of Force and its Justifications: Plus ca Change?’ In Krieger, H., and Liese, A. (eds). Tracing Value Change in the International Legal Order: Perspectives from Legal and Political Science, 136–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuters. 2021. ‘Belarus Points to Hamas Bomb Threat in Plane Diversion, Hamas Rejects Claim.’ 25 May. www.reuters.com/world/europe/belarus-points-hamas-bomb-threat-plane-diversion-hamas-rejects-claim-2021-05-24/.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2023. ‘Norway Proposes 40% Gender Quota for Large and Mid-size Unlisted Firms.’ 19 June. www.reuters.com/markets/europe/norwayproposes-40-gender-quota-large-mid-size-unlisted-firms-2023-06-19/.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian 2001. ‘Human Rights and the Social Construction of Sovereignty.’ Review of International Studies 27(4): 519–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian 2011. ‘Struggles for Individual Rights and the Expansion of the International System.’ International Organization 65(2): 207–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoads, Emily Paddon 2016. Taking Sides in Peacekeeping: Impartiality and the Future of the United Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rhoads, Emily Paddon, and Welsh, Jennifer 2019. ‘Close Cousins in Protection: The Evolution of Two Norms.’ International Affairs 95(3): 597–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Condoleezza 2008. ‘U.S. Recognizes Kosovo as Independent State.’ https://2001-2009.state.gov/secretary/rm/2008/02/100973.htm.Google Scholar
Rich, Bruce 1994. Mortgaging the Earth: The World Bank, Environmental Impoverishment and the Crisis of Development. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Frank 2007. ‘The “Good Germans” Among Us.’ Der Spiegel, 15 October. www.spiegel.de/international/frank-rich-the-good-germans-among-us-a-511459.html.Google Scholar
Riis Andersen, Louise 2018. ‘The HIPPO in the Room: The Pragmatic Push-Back from the UN Peace Bureaucracy against the Militarization of UN Peacekeeping.’ International Affairs 94(2): 343–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas 2000. ‘“Let’s Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics.’ International Organization 51(1): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, and Sikkink, Kathryn 1999. ‘The Socialization of International Human Rights into Domestic Practices: Introduction.’ In Risse, T., Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, K. (eds). The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, 1–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn (eds). 1999. The Power of Human Rights. International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn (eds). 2013. The Persistent Power of Human Rights: From Commitment to Compliance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivas, Althea-Marai, and Safi, Mariam 2022. ‘Women and the Afghan Peace and Reintegration Process.’ International Affairs 98(1): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Anthea 2017. Is International Law International? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Melvin L. 2009. ‘Dewey, Pluralism, and Democracy: A Response to Robert Talisse.’ Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45(1): 75–79.Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi 2006. The Pinochet Effect: Transitional Justice in the Age of Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Eleanor 1948. ‘On the Adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.’ Speech Delivered 9 December, Paris, France. www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/eleanorrooseveltdeclarationhumanrights.htm.Google Scholar
Rosenne, Shabtai, (ed). 1975. League of Nations Conference for the Codification of International Law (1930). Dobbs Ferry: Oceana Publications.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Uriel, Charles, Michael T., and T’Hart, Paul 1989. Coping with Crises. The Management of Disasters, Riots and Terrorism. Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publishers.Google Scholar
Rosert, Elvira 2019. ‘Norm Emergence as Agenda Diffusion: Failure and Success in the Regulation of Cluster Munitions.’ European Journal of International Relations 25(4): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119842644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Andrew A. G. 2006. ‘Coming in from the Cold: Constructivism and Emotions.’ European Journal of International Relations 12(2): 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Andrew A. G. 2014. Mixed Emotions: Beyond Fear and Hatred in International Conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Alf 2019. On Law and Justice, Holtermann, Jakob v. H. (ed.), Bindreiter, U. (trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Elise 2018. ‘Power, Mechanisms, and Denunciations: Understanding Compliance with Human Rights in International Relations.’ Political Studies Review 16(4): 318–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1982. ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order.’ International Organization 36(2): 379–415. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1983. ‘Human Rights and the Future International Community.’ Daedalus 112(4): 93–110.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1993. ‘Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations.’ International Organization 47(1): 139–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 2004. ‘Reconstituting the Global Public Domain – Issues, Actors, and Practices.’ European Journal of International Relations 10(4): 499–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruhl, Christian, Hollis, Duncan, Hoffman, Wyatt, and Maurer, Tim 2020. ‘Cyberspace and Geopolitics: Assessing Global Cybersecurity Norm Processes at a Crossroads.’ Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/02/26/cyberspace-and-geopolitics-assessing-global-cybersecurity-norm-processes-at-crossroads-pub-81110.Google Scholar
Rüland, Anchalee 2018. ‘Norms in Conflict: An Analysis of State Responses to Norm Conflict in Southeast Asia.’ Ph.D. dissertation. Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Rüland, Anchalee 2022. Norms in Conflict: Southeast Asia’s Response to Human Rights Violations in Myanmar. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüland, Anchalee, and Welsh, Jennifer M. 2024. ‘Understanding and Resolving Norm Conflict.’ In Orchard, P., and Wiener, A. (eds). Contesting the World. Norm Research in Theory and Practice, 43–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Safety4Sea. 2019. ‘Migrant Rescue Vessel Denied Access to EU Ports.’ https://safety4sea.com/migrant-rescue-vessel-denied-access-to-eu-ports/.Google Scholar
Salter, Mark 2003. Rights of Passage: The Passport in International Relations. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saltnes, Johanne D. 2019. ‘Resistance to EU Integration? Norm Collision in the Coordination of Development Aid.’ Journal of European Integration 41(4): 525–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Rebecca 2011. ‘(Im)plausible Legality: The Rationalisation of Human Rights Abuses in the American “Global War on Terror”.’ International Journal of Human Rights 15(4): 605–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne 2007. Prohibiting Plunder: How Norms Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne 2008. ‘Dynamics of International Norm Change: Rules against Wartime Plunder.’ European Journal of International Relations 14(1): 101–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne 2009. ‘Explaining International Norm Change.’ In Sandtholz, W., and Stiles, K. (eds). International Norms and Cycles of Change, 1–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne 2016. ‘The Multiple Paths to Norm Replacement.’ Paper presented to the International Studies Association meeting, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne 2017a. ‘Domestic Law and Human Rights Treaty Commitments: The Convention against Torture.’ Journal of Human Rights 16(1): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne 2017b. ‘International Norm Change.’ In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-588.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne 2019. ‘Norm Contestation, Robustness, and Replacement.’ Journal of Global Security Studies 4(1): 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne, and Stiles, Kendall 2009. International Norms and Cycles of Change. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sarfaty, Galit A. 2009. ‘Why Culture Matters in International Institutions: The Marginality of Human Rights at the World Bank.’ American Journal of International Law 103: 647–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarfaty, Galit A. 2012. Values in Translation: Human Rights and the Culture of the World Bank. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian, and Grey, Sandra L. (eds). 2009. Women’s Movements: Flourishing or in Abeyance? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian, Banaszak, Lee A., Kantola, Johanna, and True, Jacqui 2023. Handbook of Feminist Governance. London: Edward Elgar Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, Keith R. 2005. Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Oscar 1977. ‘The Invisible College of International Lawyers.’ Northwestern University Law Review 72(2): 217–226.Google Scholar
Schenkkan, Nate, and Linzer, Isabel 2021. ‘Out of Sight, Not Out of Reach: The Global Scale and Scope of Transnational Repression.’ Freedom House Report. Washington, DC: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank 2001. ‘The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union.’ International Organization 55(1): 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Averell, and Sikkink, Kathryn 2019. ‘Breaking the Ban? The Heterogeneous Impact of US Contestation of the Torture Norm.’ Journal of Global Security Studies 4(1): 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogy036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Dennis R. 2021. ‘Complexity in International Society: Theorising Fragmentation and Linkages in Primary and Secondary Institutions.’ Complexity, Governance & Networks 6(1): 94. https://doi.org/10.20377/cgn-105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Sebastian 2014. ‘Foreign Military Presence and the Changing Practice of Sovereignty: A Pragmatist Explanation of Norm Change.’ American Political Science Review 108(4): 817–829. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneiker, Andrea 2020. ‘Norm Sabotage: Conceptual Reflection on a Phenomenon That Challenges Well-Established Norms.’ International Studies Perspectives 22(1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekaa003.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Nico 2010. Development with Destruction: The UN and Global Resource Management. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Schrover, Marlou, and Moloney, Deirdre M. 2013. Gender, Migration and Categorization: Mapping Distinctions between Migrants in Western Countries, 1945–2010. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Shirley 2017. International Law in World Politics: An Introduction. 3rd edn. Boulder: Lynne Riener Publishers.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Seidman, Gay W. 2000. ‘Adjusting the Lens: What Do Globalizations, Transnationalism, and the Anti-Apartheid Movement Mean for Social Movement Theory?’ In Guidry, J., Kennedy, M., and Mayer, Z. (eds). Globalizations and Social Movements: Culture, Power, and the Transnational Public Sphere, 339–357. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sending, Ole J. 2016. ‘Agency, Order, and Heteronomy.’ European Review of International Studies 3(3): 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setzer, Joana, and Vanhala, Lisa C. 2019. ‘Climate Change Litigation: A Review of Research on Courts and Litigants in Climate Governance.’ Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews on Climate Change 10(3): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory C., and Ginsburg, Tom 2012. ‘The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship.’ American Journal of International Law 106(1): 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Gregoy C., and Pollack, Mark A. 2013. ‘Hard and Soft Law.’ In Dunoff, J. L., and Pollack, M. A. (eds). Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, 197–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shalin, Dmitri N. 1992. ‘Critical Theory and the Pragmatist Challenge.’ American Journal of Sociology 98(2): 237–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffman, Jeremy 2014. ‘Knowledge, Moral Claims and the Exercise of Power in Global Health.’ International Journal of Health Policy and Management 3(6): 297–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sieber, Ulrich 2010. ‘Legal Order in a Global World – The Development of a Fragmented System of National, International, and Private Norms.’ In Max Planck Institute for Peace and the Rule of Law (ed). Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 14, 1–49. London: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sienknecht, Mitja 2021a. ‘Rebel with a Cause – Rebel Responsibility in Intrastate Conflict Situations.’ In Hansen-Magnusson, H., and Vetterlein, A. (eds). The Routledge Handbook on Responsibility in International Relations, 1–22. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sienknecht, Mitja 2021b. ‘The PKK’s Zig-Zag in Its Global Quest for Recognition.’ In Geis, A., Clément, M., and Pfeiffer, H. (eds). Armed Non-State Actors and the Politics of Recognition, 109–129. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Sienknecht, Mitja, and Vetterlein, Antje 2022. Conceptualizing Responsibility(-gaps) in World Politics. Manuscript under review, on file with the authors.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn 1993. ‘Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America.’ International Organization 47(3): 411–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions are Changing World Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn 2013. ‘The United States and Torture.’ In Risse, T., Ropp, S. C., and Sikkink, Kathryn. (eds). The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, 145–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn, and Kim, Hun J. 2013. ‘The Justice Cascade: The Origins and Effectiveness of Prosecutions of Human Rights Violations.’ Annual Review of Law and Social Science 9(1): 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102612-133956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Jo, Hyeran 2019. ‘Measuring Norms and Normative Contestation: The Case of International Criminal Law.’ Journal of Global Security Studies 4(1): 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogy043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skogly, Sigrun I. 2001. The Human Rights Obligations of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. London: Cavendish Publishing.Google Scholar
Sluga, Glenda 2013. Internationalism in the Age of Nationalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluga, Glenda, and James, Carolyn (eds). 2015. Women, Diplomacy and International Politics Since 1500. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Karen E. 2010. Genocide and the Europeans. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somer, Jonathan 2015. ‘Non-State Armed Groups Continue to Cause Environmental Damage in Conflicts, yet States are Reluctant to Meaningfully Address their Conduct for Fear of Granting them Legitimacy.’ CEOBS Blog, 4 December. https://ceobs.org/environmental-protection-and-non-state-armed-groups-setting-a-place-at-the-table-for-the-elephant-in-the-room/.Google Scholar
Sondermann, Elena, Ulbert, Cornelia, and Finkenbusch, Peter 2018. ‘Introduction: Moral Agency and the Politics of Responsibility.’ In Ulbert, C., Finkenbusch, P., Sondermann, E., and Debiel, T. (eds). Moral Agency and the Politics of Responsibility, 1–18. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stappert, Nora 2018. ‘A New Influence of Legal Scholars? The Use of Academic Writings at International Criminal Courts and Tribunals.’ Leiden Journal of International Law 31(4): 963–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stappert, Nora 2020. ‘Practice Theory and Change in International Law: Theorizing the Development of Legal Meaning through the Interpretive Practices of International Criminal Courts.’ International Theory 12(1): 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staunton, Eglantine, and Ralph, Jason 2020. ‘The Responsibility to Protect Norm Cluster and the Challenge of Atrocity Prevention: An Analysis of the European Union’s Strategy in Myanmar.’ European Journal of International Relations 26: 660–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbrook, Robert 2020. ‘A US Election Victory for Science and Public Health.’ British Medical Journal 10 November: 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Hayley 2013. Institutionalizing Unsustainability: The Paradox of Global Climate Change. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stimmer, Anette 2019a. ‘Beyond Internalization: Alternate Endings of the Norm Life Cycle.’ International Studies Quarterly 63(2): 270–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimmer, Anette Forthcoming. ‘Norm Contestation and Change in International Politics.’ Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stimmer, Anette 2024. ‘The Interaction of Law and Politics in Norm Interpretation.’ In Orchard, P., and Wiener, A. (eds). Contesting the World: Norm Research in Theory and Practice, 164–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stimmer, Anette, and Wisken, Lea 2019. ‘The Dynamics of Dissent: When Actions are Louder than Words.’ International Affairs 95(3): 515–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Deane, and Moloney, Kim (eds). 2019. The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Laurel 2015. ‘Quantitative Analysis of Women’s Participation in Peace Processes.’ In O’Reilly, M., Ó Suilleabhan, A., and Paffenholz, T. (eds). Reimagining Peacemaking: Women’s Roles in Peace Processes, 34, Annex II. Washington, DC: Institute for International Peace.Google Scholar
Strand, Vibeke B. 2019. ‘Interpreting the ECHR in Its Normative Environment: Interaction between the ECHR, the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.’ The International Journal of Human Rights 24(7): 979–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1574423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strezhnev, Anton, Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A. 2021. ‘Testing for Negative Spillovers: Is Promoting Human Rights Really Part of the “Problem”?’ International Organization 75(1): 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Study Group of the International Law Commission. 2006. ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law.’ Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, finalised by Koskenniumi, M. 13 April, Geneva. https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_l702.pdf.Google Scholar
Subotic, Jelena 2017. ‘Constructivism as Professional Practice in the US Academy.’ PS: Political Science & Politics 50(1): 84–88.Google Scholar
Subotic, Jelena, and Zarakol, Ayşe 2013. ‘Cultural Intimacy in International Relations.’ European Journal of International Relations 19(4): 915–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Mark C. 1995. ‘Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.’ Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Michael, and Solove, Daniel J. 2013. ‘Radical Pragmatism.’ In Malachowski, A. (ed). The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism, 324–344. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Susskind, Yifat, and Duarte, Diana 2019. ‘Networked Advocacy.’ In Davies, S. E., and True, J. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace, and Security, 792–802. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Shogi 2009. Civilization and Empire. China and Japan’s Encounter with European International Society. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taguba, Antonio M. 2004. ‘Article 15-6 Investigation of the 800th Military Police Brigade.’ Federation of American Scientists (FAS). https://fas.org/irp/agency/dod/taguba.pdf.Google Scholar
Talisse, Robert 2007. A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas and Zürn, Michael 2019. ‘The Legitimacy and Legitimation of International Organizations: Introduction and Framework.’ The Review of International Organizations 14(4): 581–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina 1999. ‘The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-use.’ International Organization 53(3): 433–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina 2005. ‘Stigmatizing the Bomb: Origins of the Nuclear Taboo.’ International Security 29(4): 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TASS. ‘Russia Supports ICAO’s Investigation into Incident with Ryanair Flight.’ 28 May. https://tass.com/politics/1295055.Google Scholar
Taylor, Sarah 2019. ‘Advocacy and the Women, Peace and Security Agenda.’ In Davies, S. E., and True, J. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace, and Security. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G. 2000. Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G. 2011. Humanity’s Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terman, Rochelle 2020. ‘The Positive Side of Negative Identity: Stigma and Deviance in Backlash Movements.’ The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22(4): 619–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terman, Rochelle, and Voeten, Erik 2018. ‘The Relational Politics of Shame: Evidence from the Universal Periodic Review.’ The Review of International Organizations 13(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Atlantic. 2007. ‘Verschärfte Vernehmung.’ 29 May. www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2007/05/-versch-auml-rfte-vernehmung/228158/.Google Scholar
The Moscow Times. 2021. ‘Lukashenko Defends “Legal” Plane Diversion to Belarus, Kremlin Backs Him.’ 26 May. www.themoscowtimes.com/2021/05/26/lukashenko-defends-legal-plane-diversion-to-belarus-kremlin-backs-him-a74013.Google Scholar
The New York Times. 2020. ‘City of Paris Fined Nearly $110,000 for Appointing Too Many Women.’ 16 December. www.nytimes.com/2020/12/16/world/europe/paris-too-many-women-fine.html.Google Scholar
The White House. 2021. ‘Statement by President Joe Biden on Diversion of Ryanair Flight and Arrest of Journalist in Belarus.’ 24 May. www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/05/24/statement-by-president-joe-biden-on-diversion-of-ryanair-flight-and-arrest-of-journalist-in-belarus/.Google Scholar
Thoits, Peggy A. 2004. ‘Emotion Norms, Emotion Work, and Social Order.’ In Manstead, A. S. R., Frijda, N., and Fischer, A. (eds). Feelings and Emotions. The Amsterdam Symposium, 359–378. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Daniel C. 2001. The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, B. 2017. ‘Determining Criteria to Evaluate Outcomes of Businesses’ Provision of Remedy: Applying a Human Rights-Based Approach.’ Business and Human Rights Journal 2: 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thörn, Håkan 2006. Anti-Apartheid and the Emergence of a Global Civil Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tickner, Ann J., and True, Jacqui 2018. ‘A Century of International Relations Feminism: From World War I Women’s Peace Pragmatism to the Women, Peace and Security Agenda.’ International Studies Quarterly 62(2): 221–233.Google Scholar
Tickner, Ann J., and True, Jacqui 2002. Stories, Identities and Political Change. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael 2007. Reputation and International Cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tooze, Adam 2023. ‘This is Why “Polycrisis” is a Useful Way of Looking at the World Right Now.’ Interview with Radio Davos, 15 February. Transcript published in World Economic Forum 2023. Global Health, 7 March. www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/03/polycrisis-adam-tooze-historian-explains/.Google Scholar
Torpey, John 1998. ‘Coming and Going: On the State Monopolization of the Legitimate “Means of Movement”.’ Sociological Theory 16(3): 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, Jacqui 2016. ‘Explaining the Global Diffusion of the Women, Peace and Security Agenda.’ International Political Science Review 37(3): 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, Jacqui 2017. ‘Ending Violence against Women in Asia: International Norm Diffusion and Global Opportunity Structures for Policy Change.’ UNRISD Working Paper.Google Scholar
True, Jacqui 2020. ‘Explaining the Global Diffusion of the Women, Peace and Security Agenda.’ International Political Science Review 37(3): 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, Jacqui, and Mintrom, Michael 2001. ‘Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion.’ International Studies Quarterly 45(1): 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, Jacqui, and Wiener, Antje 2019. ‘Everyone Wants (a) Peace: The Dynamics of Rhetoric and Practice on “Women, Peace and Security”.’ International Affairs 95(3): 553–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True-Frost, Cora C. 2022. ‘Listening to Dissonance at the Intersections of International Human Rights Law.’ Michigan Journal of International Law 43(2): 361–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tryggestad, Torunn L. 2009. ‘Trick or Treat? The UN and Implementation of Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security.’ Global Governance 15(4): 539–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James 2002. ‘The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparison to Their Ideals of Constitutional Democracy.’ The Modern Law Review 65(2): 204–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Catherine 2019. ‘“Soft Ways of Doing Hard Things”: Women Mediators and the Question of Gender in Mediation.’ Peacebuilding 8(4): 383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Stephen J., Shelton, Dinah L., Razzaque, Jona, McIntyre, Owen, and May, James R. (eds). 2019. Environmental Rights: The Development of Standards. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udall, L. 1997. The World Bank Inspection Panel: A Three Year Review. Washington, DC: Bank Information Center.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. 1966. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. 1979. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. New York: United Nations. www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/cedaw.pdf.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. 2006. Human Rights Council: Resolution, adopted by the General Assembly. A/RES/60/251. 3 April. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
UN Women. 2015. Preventing Conflict, Transforming Justice, Securing the Peace: A Global Study on the Implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325. New York: UN Women.Google Scholar
UN Women. 2018. Women’s Meaningful Participation in Negotiating Peace and the Implementation of Peace Agreements: Report of the Expert Group Meeting. New York: UN Women.Google Scholar
UN Women. 2021. Beyond COVID-19: A Feminist Plan for Sustainability and Social Justice. New York: UN Women.Google Scholar
UNHCR. 2015. ‘Rescue at Sea: A Guide to Principles and Practices as Applied to Refugees and Migrants.’ UNHCR Brochures. www.unhcr.org/publications/brochures/450037d34/rescue-sea-guide-principles-practice-applied-migrants-refugees.html.Google Scholar
UNHCR and IOM. 2019. ‘UNHCR and IOM joint statement: International approach to refugees and migrants in Libya must change.’ Geneva. www.unhcr.org/news/press/2019/7/5d2765d04/unhcr-iom-joint-statement-international-approach-refugees-migrants-libya.html.Google Scholar
Unifeed. 2021. ‘UN/Russia Belarus Protasevich.’ 28 May. www.unmultimedia.org/tv/unifeed/asset/2623/2623451/.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1946–7. Yearbook of the United Nations. New York: United Nations. www.un.org/en/yearbook.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, General Assembly Resolution 217A.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2000. Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, Supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2005. ‘Outcome Document of the 2005 World Summit.’ 24 October. https://undocs.org/A/RES/60/1.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2012. ‘Report of the Secretary-General’s Internal Review Panel on United Nations Action in Sri Lanka.’ https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/737299?ln=en.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2013. ‘Human Rights due Diligence Policy on United Nations Support to Non-United Nations Security Forces.’ A/67/775 – S/2013/110. 5 March. Geneva.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2014. ‘Fulfilling Our Collective Responsibility: International Assistance and the Responsibility to Protect.’ Report of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly, Sixty-eighth Session. A/68/947. 11 July. New York.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2015a. ‘Human Rights Up Front: An Overview.’ https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/system/files/overview_of_human_rights_up_front_july_2015.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2015b. ‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights.’ United Nations General Assembly 70th Session. A/70/274. www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/70/274.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2018. ‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on the issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy, and sustainable environment.’ United Nations General Assembly 73rd Session. A/73/188. https://undocs.org/A/73/188.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2022. ‘Belarus Improperly Diverted Passenger Flight, Endangered Lives, International Civil Aviation Organization Senior Official Tells Security Council.’ SC/15088. 31 October. https://press.un.org/en/2022/sc15088.doc.htm.Google Scholar
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2002. ‘Background Note on the Protection of Asylum-Seekers and Refugees Rescued at Sea.’ UNHCR.Google Scholar
United Nations Human Rights Council. 2015. ‘The Role of Prevention in the Promotion and Prevention of Human Rights.’ Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. A/HRC/30/20. 16 July. Geneva.Google Scholar
United Nations Human Rights Council. 2019. ‘Promotion of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of Non-Recurrence: Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of Non-Recurrence.’ A/HRC/42/45. 11 July. Geneva.Google Scholar
United Nations Human Rights Council. 2020. ‘Overview of Consultations on the Contribution of the Human Rights Council to the Prevention of Human Rights Violations.’ Report of the Rapporteurs. A/HRC/43/37. 14 January. Geneva.Google Scholar
United Nations Mandate of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, ‘Letter to the Islamic Republic of Iran.’ AL IRN 28/2020. 24 December 2020, 3.Google Scholar
United Nations Secretary General. 2013. ‘The Universal, Indivisible, Interrelated, Interdependent and Mutually Reinforcing Nature of All Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.’ Report of the Secretary-General. United Nations General Assembly. A/68/224. 23 July. New York.Google Scholar
United Nations Secretary General. 2015. ‘Report on Conflict-Related Sexual Violence.’ S/2015/361. 2 June.Google Scholar
United Nations Secretary General. 2016. ‘Report on Conflict-Related Sexual Violence.’ S/2016/361, 22 June.Google Scholar
United Nations Secretary General. 2017. ‘Report of the Secretary-General: Implementing the Responsibility to Protect: Accountability for Prevention.’ A/71/1016 –S/2017/556. 10 August. New York. www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/2017%20SG%20report%20on%20RtoP%20Advanced%20copy.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations Secretary General. 2019. ‘Resolution 2493 (2019).’ S/Res/2493. 29 October.Google Scholar
United Nations Secretary General. 2020a. Policy Brief: The Impact of COVID-19 on Women. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations Secretary General. 2020b. ‘Gender-based violence and Covid-19. Video Message by the Secretary General.’ 4 May. www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2020-04-05/secretary-generals-video-message-gender-based-violence-and-covid-19-scrolldown-for-french.Google Scholar
Universal Rights Group. 2017. ‘How to Operationalize the Council’s “Prevention” Mandate: The Effective Implementation of Paragraph 5F of GA Res. 60/251.’ Permanent Mission of Norway to the United Nations, Universal Rights Group, and the Mission permanente de la Suisse auprés de l’Office des Nations Unies et des autres organisations internationals à Geneve. www.universal-rights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Glion_final_report.pdf.Google Scholar
United States Mission to the United Nations. 2022. ‘Remarks at a UN Security Council Briefing on the ICAO Report on Belarus’ Diversion of Ryanair Flight 4978.’ 31 October. https://usun.usmission.gov/remarks-at-a-un-security-council-briefing-on-the-icao-report-on-belarus-diversion-of-ryanair-flight-4978/.Google Scholar
UNSC S/PV.7125. 2014. ‘United Nations Security Council.’ 7125th meeting. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/PRO/N14/250/46/PDF/N1425046.pdf?OpenElement.Google Scholar
UNSC S/PV.7134. 2014. ‘United Nations Security Council.’ 7134th meeting. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/PRO/N14/263/70/PDF/N1426370.pdf?OpenElement.Google Scholar
Urpelainen, Johannes 2010. ‘Regulation under Eeconomic Globalization.’ International Studies Quarterly 54(4): 1099–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Justice. 2004. ‘Memorandum for James B. Comey, Deputy Attorney General, Re: Legal Standards Applicable Under 18 USC. 2340-2340A.’ Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
US Department of State. 2016. ‘Ambassador Power’s Remarks at a UN Security Council Briefing on Syria.’ 26 September. www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJjvUkuQ_4I.Google Scholar
US Department of State. 2021. ‘Holding the Lukashenka Regime and Its Enablers to Account.’ 21 June. www.state.gov/holding-the-lukashenka-regime-and-its-enablers-to-account/.Google Scholar
Van Kersbergen, Kees, and Verbeek, Bertjan 2007. ‘The Politics of International Norms: Subsidiarity and the Imperfect Competence Regime of the European Union.’ European Journal of International Relations 13(2): 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandeveer, Stacy D., and Dabelko, Geoffrey D. 2001. ‘It’s Capacity, Stupid: International Assistance and National Implementation.’ Global Environmental Politics 1(2): 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine 2010. ‘The Transnational Politics of Judicialization. Van Gend En Loos and the Making of EU Polity.’ European Law Journal 16 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine 2014. ‘Communities of International Litigators.’ In Romano, C. P. R., Alter, K. J., and Shany, Y. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, 655–668. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venzke, Ingo 2012. How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Change and Normative Twists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetterlein, Antje 2018. ‘Responsibility Is More Than Accountability: The Conditions of Moral Agency of Corporate Social Responsibility.’ Contemporary Politics 24(5): 545–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetterlein, Antje, and Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes 2020. ‘The Rise of Responsibility in World Politics.’ In Hansen-Mangnusson, H., and Vetterlein, A. (eds). The Rise of Responsibility in World Politics, 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vezina, Renee 2012. ‘Combating Impunity in Haiti: Why the ICC Should Prosecute Sexual Abuse by UN Peacekeepers.’ Ave Maria International Law Journal 1(2): 431–460.Google Scholar
Vincent, Raymond J. 1984. ‘Racial Equality.’ In Bull, H., and Watson, A. (eds). The Expansion of International Society, 239–254. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Vitalis, Robert 2000. ‘The Graceful and Generous Liberal Gesture: Making Racism Invisible in American International Relations.’ Millennium 29(2): 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitalis, Robert 2015. White World Order, Black Power Politics: The Birth of American International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vitalis, Robert 2017. ‘UN Peace Operations and Conflicting Legitimacies.’ Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 11(3): 286–305.Google Scholar
Von Eschen, Penny M. 1997. Race against Empire: Black Americans and Anti-Colonialism, 1937–1957. Ithaca: Cornell.Google Scholar
Von Glahn, Gerhard, and Taulbee, James L. 2017. Law Among Nations: An Introduction to Public International Law. 11th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vucetic, Srdjan 2011. ‘Genealogy as a Research Tool in International Relations.’ European Journal of International Relations 37(3): 1295–1312.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert H. 1997. ‘Greening the Bank: The Struggle over the Environment 1970–1995.’ In Kapur, D., Lewis, J., and Webb, R. C. (eds). The World Bank: Its First Half Century, 611–734. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Walker, Neil 2008. ‘Beyond Boundary Disputes and Basic Grids: Mapping the Global Disorder of Normative Orders.’ International Journal of Constitutional Law 6(3–4): 373–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Neil 2014. Intimations of Global Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Shaun 2020. ‘Rule of Law Fears Remain in Poland despite EU Compromise.’ The Guardian (London). December 2020. www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/11/eu-fears-hungary-poland-compromise-not-end-of-story.Google Scholar
Waltz, Waldo E. 1937. The Nationality of Married Women: A Study of Domestic Policies and International Legislation. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Jon 2008. ‘White House Says Waterboarding not Torture.’ The Washington Post, 7 February.Google Scholar
Watt, Nicholas, and Wintour, Patrick 2015. ‘How Immigration Came to Haunt Labour: The Inside Story.’ The Guardian, 24 March.Google Scholar
Weaver, Catherine 2007. ‘The World’s Bank and the Bank’s World.’ Global Governance 13(4): 493–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max 1977. Critique of Stammler, Oakes, G. (trans.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Weldes, Jutta 1996. ‘Constructing National Interests.’ European Journal of International Relations 2(2): 275–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellens, Karel 2002. Remedies against International Organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, Jennifer M. 2013. ‘Norm Contestation and the Responsibility to Protect.’ Global Responsibility to Protect 5(4): 365–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, Jennifer M. 2018. ‘Humanitarian Actors and International Political Theory.’ In Brown, C., and Eckersley, R. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of International Political Theory, 316–329. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Welsh, Jennifer M. 2019. ‘The Individualization of War: Defining a Research Programme.’ Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi 53(1): 9–28.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander E. 1987. ‘The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory.’ International Organization 41(3): 335–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander E. 1992. ‘Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.’ International Organization 46(2): 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander E. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Etienne 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenham, Clare, Smith, Julia, Davies, Sara E., Feng, Huiyun, Grépin, Karen A., Harman, Sophie, Herten-Crabb, Asha, and Morgan, Rosemary 2020. ‘Women are Most Affected by Pandemics – Lessons from Past Outbreaks.’ Nature, 8 July. www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02006-z.Google Scholar
Westerman, Pauline C. 2013. ‘Pyramids and the Value of Generality.’ Regulation and Governance 7(1): 80–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, Jeni 2013. How Peace Operations Work: Power, Legitimacy and Effectiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, Jeni 2017. ‘Dealing with Disgrace: Addressing Sexual Exploitation and Abuse in UN Peacekeeping.’ In Providing for Peacekeeping 15. Brisbane: International Peace Institute.Google Scholar
Widmaier, Wesley W., and Glanville, Luke 2015. ‘The Benefits of Norm Ambiguity: Constructing the Responsibility to Protect across Rwanda, Iraq and Libya.’ Contemporary Politics 21(4): 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiebelhaus-Brahm, Eric 2016. ‘Use, Abuse, and Disuse of Transitional Justice Norms in the Wake of the Arab Spring.’ In Aman, M. A., and Aman, M. J. (eds). The Middle East: New Order or Disorder?, 413–439. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Organization/Westphalia Press.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje 2004. ‘Contested Compliance: Interventions on the Normative Structure of World Politics.’ European Journal of International Relations 10(2): 189–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje 2007. ‘The Dual Quality of Norms: and Governance beyond the State: Sociological and Normative Approaches to Interaction.’ Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10(1): 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje 2008. The Invisible Constitution of Politics: Contested Norms and International Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje 2009. ‘Enacting Meaning-in-Use: Qualitative Research on Norms and International Relations.’ Review of International Studies 35(1): 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje 2014. A Theory of Contestation. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje 2017a. ‘Agency of the Governed in Global International Relations: Access to Norm Validation.’ Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 2(5): 709–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje 2017b. ‘A Theory of Contestation – A Concise Summary of Its Argument and Concepts.’ Polity 49(1): 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje 2018. Contestation and Constitution of Norms in Global International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje 2020. ‘Norm(ative) Change in International Relations: A Conceptual Framework.’ KFG Working Paper Series No. 44. Berlin Potsdam Research Group ‘The International Rule of Law – Rise or Decline?’ https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract=3638205.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje 2022. ‘Societal Multiplicity for International Relations: Engaging Societal Interaction in Building Global Governance from Below.’ Cooperation and Conflict 57(3): 348–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje, and Puetter, Uwe 2009. ‘The Quality of Norms is What Actors Make of It: Critical Constructivist Research on Norms.’ Journal of International Law and International Relations 5(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje, Börzel, Tanja A., and Risse, Thomas (eds). 2019. European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkens, Jan, and Datchoua-Tirvaudey, Alvine R. C. 2022. ‘Researching Climate Justice: A Decolonial Approach to Global Climate Governance.’ International Affairs 98(1): 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willetts, Peter 1982. ‘Pressure Groups as Transnational Actors.’ In Willetts, P. (ed). Pressure Groups in the Global System: The Transnational Relations of Issue-Oriented Non-Governmental Organizations, 1–27. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Owain D., and Rushton, Simon 2011. ‘Private Actors and Global Health Governance.’ In Williams, O. D., and Rushton, S. (eds). Partnerships and Foundations in Global Health Governance, 1–25. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wills, Siobhán 2013. ‘Continuing Impunity of Peacekeepers: The Need for a Convention.’ Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies 4: 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WILPF. 2016. ‘Move the Money from War to Peace.’ www.wilpf.org/move-the-money/.Google Scholar
WILPF. 2017. Obstacles to Women’s Meaningful Participation in Peace Efforts in Ukraine. Geneva: Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom.Google Scholar
WILPF. 2018. Towards a Feminist Security Council: A Guidance Note for Security Council Members. Geneva: Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom.Google Scholar
Winston, Carla 2018. ‘Norm Structure, Diffusion, and Evolution: A Conceptual Approach.’ European Journal of International Relations 24(3): 638–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, Carla 2020. ‘Truth Commissions as Tactical Concessions: The Curious Case of Idi Amin.’ The International Journal of Human Rights 25(3): 1–23.Google Scholar
Wiuff Moe, Louise, and Stepputat, Finn 2018. ‘Introduction: Peacebuilding in an Era of Pragmatism.’ International Affairs 94(2): 293–299.Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonas and Zimmermann, Lisbeth 2016. ‘Between Banyans and Battle Scenes: Liberal Norms, Contestation, and the Limits of Critique.’ Review of International Studies 42(3): 513–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Wendy H., Levi, Ron, and Deutsch, Julia 2017. ‘The Ford Foundation: Building and Domesticating the Field of Human Rights.’ In Seabrooke, L., and Hendriksen, L. F. (eds). Professional Networks in Transnational Governance, 82–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo, Byungwon, and Murdie, Amanda 2017. ‘International Organizations and Naming and Shaming: Does the International Monetary Fund Care about the Human Rights Reputation of Its Client?’ Political Studies 65(4): 767–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, N., and Lombardi, D. 2006. ‘Uneven Patterns of Governance: How Developing Countries are Represented in the IMF.’ Review of International Political Economy 13(3): 480–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. 2007. ‘From “Safeguards” to “Sustainability”: The Evolution of Environmental Discourse Inside the International Finance Corporation.’ In Stone, Diane and Wright, Christopher (eds). The World Bank and Governance: A Decade of Reform and Reaction, 67–87. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1993. Environmental Assessment Sourcebook Updates, Number 1–5, Report 21923. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2017. Environmental and Social Framework. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
WTO. 2021a. ‘Dispute Settlement Activity – Some Figures.’ www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispustats_e.htm.Google Scholar
WTO. 2021b. ‘DS170: Canada – Term of Patent Protection.’ www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds170_e.htm.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Carmen 2013. ‘Theoretical Approaches in Norm Dynamics.’ In Müller, H., and Wunderlich, C. (eds). Norm Dynamics in Multilateral Arms Control: Interests, Conflicts, and Justice, 20–47. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Carmen 2020. Rogue States as Norm Entrepreneurs: Black Sheep or Sheep in Wolves’ Clothing? Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1980. ‘International Regimes: Problems of Concept Formation.’ World Politics 32(3): 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagelmeyer, S., Bianchi, L., and Shemberg, A. 2018. ‘Non-State Based Non-Judicial Grievance Mechanisms (NSBGM): An Exploratory Analysis.’ A report prepared for the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, University of Manchester. www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/ARP/ManchesterStudy.pdf.Google Scholar
Zarakol, Ayşe 2011. After Defeat. How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zaum, Dominik 2013. ‘International Organizations, Legitimacy, and Legitimation.’ In Zaum, D. (ed). Legitimating International Organizations, 3–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZEIT. 2020. ‘Paris muss Bußgeld wegen zu vieler Frauen in Führungspositionen zahlen.’ DIE ZEIT, 15 December. www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2020-12/paris-frauenquote-geldbusse-diskriminierung-fuehrungspositionen-anne-hidalgo.Google Scholar
Zimmerli, Walter C., and Aßländer, Michael S. 1996. ‘Wirtschaftsethik.’ In Nida-Rümelin, J. (ed). Angewandte Ethik: Die Bereichsethiken und ihre theoretische Fundierung, 290–345. Stuttgart: Alfred Kröner Verlag.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Lisbeth 2016. ‘Same Same or Different? Norm Diffusion between Resistance, Compliance, and Localization in Post-conflict States.’ International Studies Perspectives 17(1): 98–115.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Lisbeth 2017. Global Norms with a Local Face: Rule-of-Law Promotion and Norm Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Lisbeth, Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Lesch, Maximilian 2018. ‘Unlocking the Agency of the Governed: Contestation and Norm Dynamics.’ TWQ Journal 2(5): 691–708.Google Scholar
Zvobgo, Kelebogile, and Loken, Meredith 2020. ‘Why Race Matters in International Relations.’ Foreign Policy, 19 June. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/06/19/why-race-matters-international-relations-ir/.Google Scholar
Zwingel, Susanne 2012. ‘How do Norms Travel? Theorizing International Women’s Rights in Transnational Perspective.’ International Studies Quarterly 56(1): 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwingel, Susanne 2013. ‘Translating International Women’s Rights Norms: CEDAW in Context.’ In Caglar, G., Prügl, E., and Zwingel, S. (eds). Feminist Strategies in International Governance, 111–126. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zwingel, Susanne 2015. Translating International Women’s Rights: The CEDAW Convention in Context. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by Phil Orchard, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Antje Wiener, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: Contesting the World
  • Online publication: 01 November 2024
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by Phil Orchard, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Antje Wiener, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: Contesting the World
  • Online publication: 01 November 2024
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by Phil Orchard, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Antje Wiener, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: Contesting the World
  • Online publication: 01 November 2024
Available formats
×