Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T13:19:23.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2025

Christina R. Bambrick
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Constitutionalizing the Private Sphere
A Comparative Inquiry
, pp. 279 - 294
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackermann, Laurie. Human Dignity: Lodestar for Equality in South Africa (Cape Town: Juta, 2012).Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Barnett, Michael (eds.). Security Communities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert. A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Ally, Nurina, and Linde, Daniel. “Pridwin: Private School Contracts, the Bill of Rights and a Missed Opportunity.” Constitutional Court Review 11 (2021), 275300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANC Constitutional Committee. “A Bill of Rights for a Democratic South Africa: A Working Draft for Consultation.” African Journal of International and Comparative Law 3 (1991), 608620.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Terence Irwin (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1999).Google Scholar
Aristotle, . The Politics. Edited by Everson, Stephen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Arkes, Hadley. Beyond the Constitution (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Austin, Granville. Working a Democratic Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Bailyn, Bernard. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Bajpai, Rochana. “Liberalisms in India: A Sketch.” In Jackson, Ben and Stears, Marc (eds.), Liberalism as Ideology: Essays in Honour of Michael Freeden (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 5376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkin, Jack. Constitutional Redemption (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkin, Jack. “Which Republican Constitution?Constitutional Commentary 32 (2017), 3159.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack, and Levinson, Sanford. “The Dangerous Thirteenth Amendment.” Columbia Law Review 112:7 (2012), 14591499.Google Scholar
Bambrick, Christina. “Neither Precisely National Nor Precisely Federal: Governmental and Administrative Authority in Tocqueville’s Democracy in America.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 48:4 (2018), 586606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamforth, Nicholas. “The Public Law–Private Law Distinction: A Comparative and Philosophical Approach.” In Leyland, Peter and Woods, Terry (eds.), Administrative Law Facing the Future: Old Constraints and New Horizons (Oxford: Blackstone, 1997).Google Scholar
Barak, Aharon. Human Dignity: The Constitutional Value and the Constitutional Right (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayly, C. A. Recovering Liberties (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Bedi, Sonu. “The Scope of Formal Equality of Opportunity: The Horizontal Effect of Rights in a Liberal Constitution.” Political Theory 42:6 (2014), 716738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Richard. “Democracy as Public Law: The Case of Constitutional Rights.” German Law Journal 14:8 (2013), 10171037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Richard. Political Constitutionalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Richard. A Republican Europe of States: Cosmopolitanism, Intergovernmentalism and Democracy in the EU (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Liberty” (1958). In Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969), 118–172.Google Scholar
Besselink, Leonard F. M.National and Constitutional Identity before and after Lisbon.” Utrecht Law Review 6:3 (2010), 3649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, Gautam. “Exclusionary Covenants and the Constitution – II: The Zoroastrian Co-op Case.” Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy, January 12, 2014. Accessed January 25, 2019 <https://indconlawphil.wordpress.com/2014/01/12/exclusionary-covenants-and-the-constitution-ii-the-zoroastrian-co-op-case>..>Google Scholar
Bhatia, Gautam. “Exclusionary Covenants and the Constitution – III: Zoroastrian Cooperative and Political Liberalism.” Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy, January 13, 2014. Accessed January 25, 2019 <https://indconlawphil.wordpress.com/2014/01/13/exclusionary-covenants-and-the-constitution-iii-zoroastrian-cooperative-and-political-liberalism>..>Google Scholar
Bhatia, Gautam. “Exclusionary Covenants and the Constitution – IV: Article 15(2), IMA v. UoI, and the Constitutional Case against Racially/Religiously Restrictive Covenants.” Indian Constitutional Law and Philosophy, January 14, 2014. Accessed January 25, 2019 <https://indconlawphil.wordpress.com/2014/01/14/exclusionary-covenants-and-the-constitution-iv-article-152-ima-v-uoi-and-the-constitutional-case-against-raciallyreligiously-restrictive-covenants>..>Google Scholar
Bhatia, Gautam. The Transformative Constitution (Uttar Pradesh: HarperCollins India, 2019).Google Scholar
Bhuwania, Anuj. Courting the People (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Black, Charles L. Jr. “The Supreme Court, 1966 Term – Foreword: ‘State Action,’ Equal Protection, and California’s Proposition 14.Harvard Law Review 81 (1967), 69109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boonzaier, Leo. “Contractual Fairness at the Crossroads.” Constitutional Court Review 11 (2021), 229274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandeis, Louis, and Warren, Samuel. “The Right to Privacy.” Harvard Law Review 4:5 (1890), 193220.Google Scholar
Brandwein, Pamela. “A Lost Jurisprudence of the Reconstruction Amendments.” Journal of Supreme Court History 41 (2016), 329346.Google Scholar
Brandwein, Pamela. Rethinking the Judicial Settlement of Reconstruction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breslin, Beau. The Communitarian Constitution (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brettschneider, Corey. When the State Speaks, What Should It Say? (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Bruggemeier, Gert, Ciacchi, Aurelia Colombi, and Comandé, Giovanni (eds.). Fundamental Rights and Private Law in the European Union: Volume 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Brugger, Winfried. “Communitarianism as the Social and Legal Theory behind the German Constitution.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 2:3 (2004), 431460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cachalia, Firoz. “Democratic Constitutionalism in the Time of the Postcolony: Beyond Triumph and Betrayal.” South African Journal on Human Rights 34:3 (2018), 375397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Ernest. “Horizontal Rights and Chinese Constitutionalism: Judicialization through Labor Disputes.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 88:1 (2012), 6392.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Charles. Conceiving a New Republic (Lawrence: Kansas University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey. “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework.” International Organization 59 (2005), 801826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin. “Rethinking State Action.” Northwestern University Law Review 80:3 (1985), 503557.Google Scholar
Chirwa, Danwood Mikenge. “The Horizontal Application of Constitutional Rights in Comparative Perspective.” Law, Democracy, and Development 10:2 (2006), 2148.Google Scholar
Chirwa, Danwood Mzikenge. “In Search of Philosophical Justifications and Theoretical Models for the Horizontal Application of Human Rights.” African Human Rights Law Journal 8:2 (2008), 294311.Google Scholar
Cicero. On Duties. Edited by Griffin, M. T. and Atikins, E. M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew. Human Rights Obligations of Non-state Actors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockrell, Alfred. “Private Law and the Bill of Rights: A Threshold Issue of ‘Horizontality.’” In Bill of Rights Compendium (Cape Town: LexisNexis South Africa), 3A13A20.Google Scholar
Cordelli, Chiara. “Democratizing Organized Religion.” Journal of Politics 79:2 (2017), 576590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla, Woolman, Stu, Fuller, Sam, Brickhill, Jason, Bishop, Michael, and Dunbar, Diana (eds.). “Grootboom.” In The Dignity Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of South Africa: Cases and Materials (New York: Fordham University Press, 2013), 415430.Google Scholar
Corrin, Jennifer. “From Horizontal and Vertical to Lateral: Extending the Effect of Human Rights in Post Colonial Legal Systems of the South Pacific.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58 (2009), 3171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Paul, and de Búrca, Gráinne. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 6th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Eoin. “Freedom as Nondomination in the Jurisprudence of Constitutional Rights.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 28:2 (2015), 289316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Eoin, and Hickey, Tom. The Political Theory of the Irish Constitution: Republicanism and the Basic Law (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Davis, Dennis. “Twenty Years of Constitutional Democracy: A Preliminary Reflection.” New York Law School Law Review 60:1 (2016), 3954.Google Scholar
Davis, Dennis M.Constitutional Borrowing: The Influence of Legal Culture and Local History in the Reconstitution of Comparative Influence – The South African Experience.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 1:2 (2003), 181195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Dennis M.Is the South African Constitution an Obstacle to a Democratic Post-colonial State?South African Journal on Human Rights 34:3 (2018), 359374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Gregorio, Giovanni. Digital Constitutionalism in Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMol, Mirjam. “The Novel Approach of the CJEU on the Horizontal Direct Effect of the EU Principle of Non-discrimination: (Unbridled) Expansionism of EU Law?Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 18 (2011), 109135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, John. “Constructing an Alternative to ‘State Action’ as a Limit on State Constitutional Rights Guarantees: A Survey, Critique, and Proposal.” Rutgers Law Journal 21 (1990), 819902.Google Scholar
DeWitt, Bruno. “The Crumbling Public/Private Divide: Horizontality in European Anti-discrimination Law.” Citizenship Studies 13:5 (2009), 515525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, Del (ed.). The Supreme Court in Conference (1940–1985): The Private Discussions behind Nearly 300 Supreme Court Decisions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Dinan, John. The American State Constitutional Tradition (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Douglas, Stacy. “Ubuntu versus Ubuntu: Finding a Philosophy of Justice through Obligation.” Law Critique 26 (2015), 305312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Plessis, Lourens Marthinus, and Corder, Hugh. Understanding South Africa’s Transitional Bill of Rights (Kenwyn: Juta, 1994).Google Scholar
Dürig, Günther. “Grundrechte und Zivilrechtsprechung.” In Maunz, Theodor (ed.), Festschrift Zum 75. Geburtstag von Hans Nawiasky (Munich: Isar Verlag, 1956), 157190.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Law’s Empire (Cambridge: Belknap, 1986).Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. “Critical Notice of On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy, by Philip Pettit, Cambridge University Press, 2012, xii + 333 pp.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43:4 (2013), 494513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhower, Dwight D.The President’s News Conference.” In Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1960–1961 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1961), 293302.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, and Melton, James. “Constitutions.” Constitute, 2023. Accessed September 13, 2023 <www.constituteproject.org/constitutions?lang=en&key=express&status=in_force>..>Google Scholar
Ellmann, Stephen. “A Constitutional Confluence: American ‘State Action’ Law and the Application of South Africa’s Socioeconomic Rights Guarantees to Private Actors.” New York Law School Law Review 45 (2001), 2175.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N., and Ferejohn, John. A Republic of Statutes: The New American Constitution (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
The Federal. “Congress Proposes Law to Bar Entry of All Women to Sabarimala Shrine.” February 7, 2021. Accessed April 25, 2021 <https://thefederal.com/states/south/kerala/congress-proposes-law-to-bar-entry-of-all-women-to-sabarimala-shrine>..>Google Scholar
Fedtke, Jorg. “Drittwirkung in Germany.” In Oliver, Dawn and Fedtke, Jorg (eds.), Human Rights and the Private Sphere (Oxford: Rutledge-Cavendish, 2007), 125156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Nuno. Fundamental Rights and Private Law in Europe: The Case of Tort Law and Children (New York: Routledge, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreres Comella, Victor. “Do Constitutional Rights Bind Private Individuals?” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Finn, Meghan. “Befriending the Bogeyman: Direct Horizontal Application in AB v. Pridwin.” South African Law Journal 137:4 (2020), 591608.Google Scholar
Forbath, William. “Not So Simple Justice: Frank Michelman on Social Rights, 1969–Present.” Tulsa Law Review 39 (2004), 597638.Google Scholar
Frantziou, Eleni. “The Horizontal Effect of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU: Rediscovering the Reasons for Horizontality.” European Law Journal 21:5 (2015), 657679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frantzoiu, Eleni. The Horizontal Effect of Fundamental Rights in the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Frantziou, Eleni. “Joined Cases C-569/16 and C-570/16 Bauer et al: (Most of) the Charter of Fundamental Rights Is Horizontally Applicable.” European Law Blog, November 19, 2018. Accessed March 22, 2019 <https://europeanlawblog.eu/2018/11/19/joined-cases-c-569-16-and-c-570-16-bauer-et-al-most-of-the-charter-of-fundamental-rights-is-horizontally-applicable/>.CrossRef.>Google Scholar
Friedman, Leon (ed.). Argument: The Complete Oral Argument before the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 1952–1955 (New York: Chelsea House, 1969).Google Scholar
Friedman, Nick. “The South African Common Law and the Constitution: Revisiting Horizontality.” South African Journal on Human Rights 30:1 (2014), 6388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futch, Delisa. “Du Plessis v. De Klerk: South Africa’s Bill of Rights and the Issue of Horizontal Application.” North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 22:3 (1997), 10091037.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. Competing Equalities: Law and the Backward Classes in India (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Galston, William. Liberal Pluralism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, William. “Liberal Virtues and the Formation of Civic Character.” In Glendon, Mary Ann and Blankenhorn, David (eds.), Seedbeds of Virtue (Lanham: Madison Books, 1995).Google Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen. “The Case for the New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism.” German Law Journal 14:12 (2013), 22292248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen. “The ‘Horizontal Effect’ of Constitutional Rights.” Michigan Law Review 102 (2003), 387459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen. “Horizontality in the Indian Constitution.” In Choudhry, Sujit, Khosla, Madhav, and Bhanu Mehta, Pratap (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 600–613.Google Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen. “Law, Politics, and the Claims of Community.” Michigan Law Review 90:4 (1992), 685760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen. “Positive and Horizontal Rights: Proportionality’s Next Frontier or a Bridge Too Far?” In Jackson, Vicki and Tushnet, Mark (eds.), Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 221–247.Google Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen. “What Makes for More or Less Powerful Constitutional Courts?Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 29:1 (2018), 140.Google Scholar
Garlicki, Lech. “Relations between Private Actors and the European Convention on Human Rights.” In Sajó, András and Uitz, Renáta (eds.), The Constitution in Private Relations (Utrecht: Eleven, 2005), 129144.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse (New York: Free Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Green, Andrew, and Yoon, Albert H.. “Triaging the Law: Developing the Common Law on the Supreme Court of India.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 14:4 (2017), 683715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Christopher R.The Original Sense of the (Equal) Protection Clause: Subsequent Interpretation and Application.” George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal 19 (2009), 219310.Google Scholar
Greene, Jamal. How Rights Went Wrong (Boston: Mariner Books, 2021).Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. “Integration by Constitution.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 3 (2005), 193208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “The Concept of Human Dignity and the Realistic Utopia of Human Rights.” Metaphilosophy 41:4 (2010), 464480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Edited by Cronin, Ciaran and de Greiff, Pablo (Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Postnational Constellation. Edited by Pensky, Max (Boston: MIT University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Hailbronner, Michaela. “Transformative Constitutionalism: Not Only in the Global South.” American Journal of Comparative Law 65:3 (2017), 527565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Robert L.Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-coercive State.” Political Science Quarterly 38 (1923), 470494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. The Federalist Papers. Edited by Rossiter, Clinton (New York: Signet, 2003).Google Scholar
Hanisch, Carol. “The Personal Is Political: The Women’s Liberation Movement Classic with a New Explanatory Introduction.” In Crow, Barbara A. (ed.), Radical Feminism: A Documentary Reader (New York: NYU Press, 2000), 113117.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis. The Liberal Tradition in America (New York: Harvest Books, 1991).Google Scholar
Hattenhauer, Hans. Die Geistesgeschichtlichen Grundlagen Des Deutschen Rechts, 3rd ed. (Heidelberg: Müller, 1983).Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis. “Shelley v. Kraemer: Notes for a Revised Opinion.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 110:4 (1962), 473505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henne, Thomas. “Die neue Wertordnung in Zivilrecht – speziell Familien-und Arbeitsrecht.” In Stolleis, Michael (ed.), Das Bonner Grundgesetz: Altes Recht und neue Verfassung in den ernsten Jahrzehnten der Bundesrepublic Deutschland (1949–1969) (Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2006), 1337.Google Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen. “‘Just Words’: Common Law and the Enforcement of State Constitutional Social and Economic Rights.” Stanford Law Review 62 (2010), 15211582.Google Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen. “The New Jersey Constitution: Positive Rights, Common Law Entitlements, and State Action.” Albany Law Review 69 (2006), 553559.Google Scholar
Herskhoff, Helen. “The Private Life of Public Rights: State Constitutions and the Common Law.” New York University Law Review Online 88:1 (2013), 123.Google Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen. “State Common Law and the Dual Enforcement of Constitutional Norms.” In Gardner, James A. and Rossi, Jim (eds.), New Frontiers of State Constitutional Law: Dual Enforcement of Norms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 151172.Google Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen. “Transforming Legal Theory in the Light of Practice: The Judicial Application of Social and Economic Rights to Private Orderings.” In Gauri, Varun and Brinks, Daniel (eds.), Courting Social Rights. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 268302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Tom. “The Republican Core of the Case for Judicial Review.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 17:1 (2019), 288315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. Comparative Matters (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. Toward Juristocracy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Edited by Tuck, Richard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Holmes, Elisa. “Antidiscrimination Rights without Equality.” Modern Law Review 68:2 (2005), 175194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honohan, Iseult. “Educating Citizens: Nation-Building and Its Republican Limits.” In Honohan, Iseult and Jennings, Jeremy (eds.), Republicanism in Theory and Practice (Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Harold W.The Misleading Search for ‘State Action’ under the Fourteenth Amendment.” Southern California Law Review 30 (1957), 208221.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Morton J.The History of the Public/Private Distinction.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 130 (1982), 14231428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isenberg, Nancy. “The Personal Is Political: Gender, Feminism, and the Politics of Discourse Theory.” American Quarterly 44:3 (1992), 449458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivison, Duncan. “Republican Human Rights?European Journal of Political Theory 9:1 (2010), 3147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. Memorandum 11 (March 15, 1954) (on file with Library of Congress, Manuscript Division, Papers of Robert H. Jackson, Box 184).Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary. Apple of Gold (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary. Constitutional Identity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary. “Dramatic Jurisprudence.” In Eskridge, William and Levinson, Sanford (eds.), Constitutional Stupidities, Constitutional Tragedies (New York: New York University Press, 1998), 172179.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary. “A Lighter Touch: American Constitutional Principles in Comparative Perspective.” In Orren, Karen and Compton, John W. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the United States Constitution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), 13–44.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary. Pragmatism, Statesmanship, and the Supreme Court (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary. The Wheel of Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary, and Roznai, Yaniv. Constitutional Revolution (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Jaffa, Harry. Crisis of the House Divided (Chicago: University of Chicago, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Andreas, and Katznelson, Ira. Liberal Beginnings: Making a Republic for the Moderns (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, David Jason. “What Is the Responsibility to Respect Human Rights? Reconsidering the ‘Respect, Protect, and Fulfill’ Framework.” International Theory 12:1 (2020), 83108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, John F.Radio and Television Report to the American People on Civil Rights.” In Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: John F. Kennedy, 1963 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1964), 468470.Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda K.Making Republicanism Useful.” Yale Law Journal 97:8 (1998), 16631672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaitan, Tarunabh. “The Duty Bearers.” In A Theory of Discrimination Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaitan, Tarunabh. “Equality: Legislative Review under Article 14.” In Choudhry, Sujit, Khosla, Madhav, and Bhanu Mehta, Pratap (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 699–719.Google Scholar
Khaitan, Tarunabh. “Killing a Constitution with a Thousand Cuts: Executive Aggrandizement and Party-State Fusion in India.” Law and Ethics of Human Rights 14:1 (2020), 4995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaitan, Tarunabh. “Reading Swaraj into Article 15: A New Deal for All Minorities.” NUJS Law Review 2:3 (2009), 420432.Google Scholar
King, Jeff. “Social Rights in Comparative Constitutional Theory.” In Jacobsohn, Gary and Schor, Miguel (eds.), Comparative Constitutional Theory (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018), 144166.Google Scholar
King, Martin Luther, Jr. “A Creative Protest.” In Carson, Clayborne, Armstrong, Tenisha Hart, Clay, Adrienne, and Carson, Susan (eds.), The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr., Volume V (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006), 367370.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz. Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism, and South Africa’s Political Reconstruction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Knight, Ben. “European Court of Justice Tells German Churches to Respect EU Discrimination Law.” Deutsche Welle, September 11, 2017. Accessed July 9, 2019 <https://p.dw.com/p/2nMsu>..>Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald, and Miller, Russell. Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, 3rd ed. (Durham: Duke University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico. Beyond Constitutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Krishnaswamy, Sudhir. “Horizontal Application of Fundamental Rights and State Action in India.” In Raj Kumar, C. and Chockalingam, K. (eds.), Human Rights, Justice, & Constitutional Empowerment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias. “Who Is Afraid of the Total Constitution? Constitutional Rights as Principles and the Constitutionalization of Private Law.” German Law Journal 7:4 (2006), 341369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, Mattias, and Comella, Victor Ferreres. “What Is So Special about Constitutional Rights in Private Litigation?” In Sajó, András and Uitz, Renáta (eds.), The Constitution in Private Relations (Utrecht: Eleven, 2005), 241–286.Google Scholar
Laborde, Cécile. “Minimal Secularism: Lessons for, and from, India.” American Political Science Review 115:1 (2021), 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborde, Cécile, and Maynor, John. Republicanism and Political Theory (Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008).Google Scholar
Larenz, Karl. Methodenlehre Der Rechtswissenschaft (Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebenberg, Sandra. “The Application of Socio-economic Rights to Private Law.” Journal of South African Law 3 (2008), 464480.Google Scholar
Liebenberg, Sandra. Socio-economic rights: Adjudication under a Transformative Constitution (Claremont: Juta, 2010).Google Scholar
Liebenberg, Sandra. “Socio-economic Rights beyond the Public Private Law Divide.” In Langford, Malcolm, Cousins, Ben, Dugard, Jackie, and Madingozi, Tshepo (eds.), Socio-economic Rights in South Africa: Symbols or Substance? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 63–91.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Second Treatise of Government. Edited by MacPherson, C. B. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1980).Google Scholar
Lowenthal, Tom. “AB v. Pridwin Preparatory School: Progress and Problems in Horizontal Human Rights Law.” South African Journal on Human Rights 36 (2020), 261274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Richard L. “Lunch ‘Sitdown’ a Legal Puzzler.” Washington Post, March 27, 1960, E5.Google Scholar
Maas, Willem. “Multilevel Citizenship.” In Shachar, Ayelet, Bauboeck, Rainer, Bloemraad, Irene, and Vink, Maarten (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Citizenship (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), 644–668.Google Scholar
Maas, Willem. “The Origins, Evolution, and Political Objectives of EU Citizenship.” German Law Journal 15:5 (2014), 797819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. Liberal Virtues (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo. Discourses on Livy. Translated by Harvey C. Mansfield and Nathan Tarcov (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madlanga, Mbuyiseli. “The Human Rights Duties of Companies and Other Private Actors in South Africa.” Stellenbosch Human Law Review 29:3 (2018), 359378.Google Scholar
Manent, Pierre. An Intellectual History of Liberalism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Marti, Jose, and Pettit, Philip. A Political Philosophy in Public Life: Civic Republicanism in Zapatero’s Spain (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Mathews, Jud. Extending Rights’ Reach (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, Jud. “Some Kind of Right.” German Law Journal 21:S1 (2020), 4044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathiba, Gaopalelwe Lesley. “Evictions and Tenure Security in South Africa.” ESR Review 19:2 (2018), 1215.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry. The Civil Law Tradition, 3rd ed. (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, Thaddeus. “Ubuntu as a Moral Theory and Human Rights in South Africa.” African Human Rights Law Journal 11 (2011), 532559.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank. “Constitutions and the Public/Private Divide.” In Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 298–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelman, Frank. “The Interplay of Constitutional and Ordinary Jurisdiction.” In Ginsburg, Tom and Dixon, Rosalind (eds.), Comparative Constitutional Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), 278–297.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank. “Law’s Republic.” Yale Law Journal 97:8 (1988), 14931537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michl, Fabian. “Wer darf wen ‘diskriminieren’? Zum Nichtannahmebeschluss in Sachen Hotelverbot (1 BvR 879/12).” VerfBlog. Accessed October 12, 2019 <https://verfassungsblog.de/wer-darf-wen-diskriminieren/>..>Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. Edited by Rapaport, Elizabeth (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1978).Google Scholar
Miller, David. “Republicanism, National Identity, and Europe.” In Laborde, Cécile and Maynor, John (eds.), Republicanism and Political Theory (Oxford: Wiley & Blackwell, 2008).Google Scholar
Modiri, Joel M.Conquest and Constitutionalism: First Thoughts on an Alternative Jurisprudence.” South African Journal on Human Rights 34:3 (2018), 300325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moseneke, Dikgang. “Transformative Constitutionalism: Its Implications for the Law of Contract.” Stellenbosch Law Review 20:1 (2009), 313.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter. Constitutional Democracy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Nair, Ravi. “Confronting the Violence Committed by Armed Opposition Groups.” Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal 1:1 (1998), 1314.Google Scholar
Nolan, Aoife. “Daniels v. Scribante: South Africa Pushes the Boundaries of Horizontality and Social Rights.” I-CONnect: Blog of the International Journal of Constitutional Law, June 27, 2017. Accessed December 20, 2017 <www.iconnectblog.com/2017/06/daniels-v-scribante-south-africa-pushes-the-boundaries-of-horizontality-and-social-rights>..>Google Scholar
Nolan, Aoife. “Holding Non-state Actors to Account for Constitutional Economic and Social Rights Violations: Experiences and Lessons from South Africa and Ireland.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 12:1 (2014), 6193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Cinnede, Colm. “Irish Constitutional Law and Direct Horizontal Effect: A Successful Experiment?” In Oliver, Dawn and Fedtke, Jorg (eds.), Human Rights in the Private Sphere (Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007), 213251.Google Scholar
Oyowe, Anthony O.Strange Bedfellows: Rethinking Ubuntu and Human Rights in South Africa.” African Human Rights Law Journal 13 (2013), 103124.Google Scholar
Pangle, Thomas. The Spirit of Modern Republicanism (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. “Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory.” In Shapiro, Ian and Macedo, Stephen (eds.), Designing Democratic Institutions (New York: NYU Press, 2000), 105146.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. On the People’s Terms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard. “The Structural Conception of Rights and Judicial Balancing.” Review of Constitutional Studies 6:2 (2002), 179212.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Postell, Joseph. “Regulation during the American Founding: Achieving Liberalism and Republicanism.” American Political Thought 5 (2016), 80108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Praeg, Leonhard. A Report on Ubuntu (Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Preuss, Ulrich. “The German Drittwirkung Doctrine and Its Socio-political Background.” In Sajó, András and Uitz, Renáta (eds.), The Constitution in Private Relations (Utrecht: Eleven, 2005), 2332.Google Scholar
Quint, Peter. “Free Speech and Private Law in German Constitutional Theory.” Maryland Law Review 48:2 (1989), 247349.Google Scholar
Quong, Jonathan. “The Argument from Autonomy.” In Jonathan Quong (ed.), Liberalism without Perfection (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radbruch, Gustav. Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaft. Edited by Zweigert, Konrad (Stuttgart: Koehler, 1980).Google Scholar
Raj, Thulasi K.Private Discrimination, Public Service and the Constitution.” Indian Law Review 6:1 (2022), 1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajagopalan, Shruti. “Constitutional Change: A Public Choice Analysis.” In Choudhry, Sujit, Khosla, Madhav, and Bhanu Mehta, Pratap (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 127–142.Google Scholar
Ramgotra, Manjeet. “India’s Republican Moment.” In Bhatia, Udit (ed.), The Indian Constituent Assembly: Deliberations on Democracy (New York: Routledge, 2018), 196223.Google Scholar
Rao, Shiva. The Framing of India’s Constitution: Selected Documents, Vols. II and V (Bombay: N. M. Tripathi, 1966).Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Richards, David A.J.Kantian Ethics and the Harm Principle: A Reply to John Finnis.” Columbia Law Review 87:3 (1987), 457471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, David. “Thick Constitutional Readings: When Classical Distinctions Are Irrelevant.” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 35 (2007), 277331.Google Scholar
Robinson, Nick. “Expanding Judiciaries: India and the Rise of the Good Governance Court.” Washington University Global Studies Law Review 8:1 (2009), 169.Google Scholar
Rodley, Nigel. “Can Armed Opposition Groups Violate Human Rights?” In Mahoney, K. and Mahoney, P. (eds.), Human Rights in the Twenty-First Century: A Global Challenge (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993), 297318.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Helena. The Lost History of Liberalism: From Ancient Rome to the Twenty-First Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Michel. “The European Treaty: Constitution and Constitutional Identity – A View from America.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 3 (2005), 316331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostow, Eugene. “The Democratic Character of Judicial Review.” Harvard Law Review 66:2 (1952), 193224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Émile. Translated by Allan Bloom (New York: Basic Books, 1979).Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract. Translated by Donald A. Cress (Indianapolis: Hackett, 2011).Google Scholar
Roux, Theunis. “The Dignity of Comparative Constitutional Law.” Acta Juridica 1 (2008), 185203.Google Scholar
Roux, Theunis. The Politics of Principle (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, Albie. “The Judicial Enforcement of Socio-economic Rights: The Grootboom Case.” In Sajó, András and Uitz, Renáta (eds.), The Constitution in Private Relations (Utrecht: Eleven, 2005), 7998.Google Scholar
Sachs, Albie. The Strange Alchemy of Life and Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech. “Joseph Raz on Liberal Neutrality and the Harm Principle.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 10:1 (1990), 122133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sager, Lawrence. Justice in Plainclothes (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. “Constitutional Ethnography.” Law and Society Review 38:3 (2004), 389406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Christopher. “On Doctrinal Confusion: The Case of the State Action Doctrine.” BYU Law Review (2016), 575–628.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Christopher. The Sit-Ins: Protest and Legal Change in the Civil Rights Era (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Christopher. “The Sit-Ins and the State Action Doctrine.” William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 18 (2010), 767829.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Gary, and Webking, Robert. “Revolutionaries, Antifederalists, and Federalists: Comments on Gordon Wood’s Understanding of the American Founding.” Political Science Reviewer 9 (1979), 195229.Google Scholar
Seidman, Louis, and Tushnet, Mark. “The State Action Paradox.” In Remnants of Belief: Contemporary Constitutional Issues (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), 4971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalhope, Robert E.Toward a Republican Synthesis.” William and Mary Quarterly 29:1 (1972), 4980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, Henry. Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and US Foreign Policy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Shumer, S. M.Machiavelli: Republican Politics and Its Corruption.” Political Theory 7:1 (1979), 534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Reva B.Equality Talk: Antisubordination and Anticlassification Values in Constitutional Struggles over Brown.” Harvard Law Review 117 (2004), 14701547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Mahendra. “India: Protection of Human Rights against State and Non-state Action.” In Oliver, Dawn and Fedtke, Jorg (eds.), Human Rights in the Private Sphere (Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007), 180212.Google Scholar
Sitapati, Vinay. “Reservations.” In Choudhry, Sujit, Khosla, Madhav, and Bhanu Mehta, Pratap (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 720–741.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “The Idea of Negative Liberty.” In Rorty, Richard, Schneewind, Jerome B, and Skinner, Quentin (eds.), Philosophy in History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), 193–222.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “The Paradoxes of Political Liberty.” In McMurrin, Sterling (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 227–250.Google Scholar
Skwyiya, Zola, and ANC Constitutional Committee. “A Bill of Rights for a New South Africa: A Working Document by the ANC Constitutional Committee.” African Journal of International and Comparative Law 3 (1991), 601607.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers. Civic Ideals (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Sommeregger, Georg. “The Horizontalization of Equality: The German Attempt to Promote Non-discrimination in the Private Sphere via Legislation.” In Sajó, András and Uitz, Renáta (eds.), The Constitution in Private Relations (Utrecht: Eleven, 2005), 33–53.Google Scholar
Spitz, Richard, and Chaskalson, Matthews. The Politics of Transition: A Hidden History of South Africa’s Negotiated Settlement (Oxford: Hart, 2000).Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. “The Juridical Coup d’État and the Problem of Authority.” German Law Journal 8:10 (2007), 915927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, and Kathleen, Stranz. “Rights Adjudication and Constitutional Pluralism in Germany and Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 19:1 (2012), 92108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stopler, Gila. “The Personal Is Political: The Feminist Critique of Liberalism and the Challenge of Right-Wing Populism.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 19:2 (2021), 393402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storing, Herbert.Slavery and the Moral Foundations of the American Republic.” In Bessette, Joseph (ed.), Toward a More Perfect Union (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1995).Google Scholar
Storing, Herbert. What the Antifederalists Were For (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. “The Anticaste Principle.” Michigan Law Review 92:8 (1994), 24102455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. “Beyond the Republican Revival.” Yale Law Journal 97:8 (1988), 15391590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Thomas, George. The Founders and the Idea of a National University (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Jean. Public Rights, Private Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, Adam. Our Republican Constitution (Portland: Hart, 2005).Google Scholar
Tripathi, P. K.Perspectives on the American Constitutional Influence on the Constitution of India.” In Beer, Lawrence (ed.), Constitutionalism in Asia: Asian Views of the American Influence (Baltimore: University of Maryland School of Law, 1988), 5698.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. “The Issue of State Action/Horizontal Effect in Comparative Constitutional Law.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (2003), 7998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. Red, White, and Blue: A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Law (Lawrence: Kansas University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution away from the Courts (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Uitz, Renáta. “Introduction.” In Sajó, András and Uitz, Renáta (eds.), The Constitution in Private Relations (Utrecht: Eleven, 2005).Google Scholar
Van der Walt, Johan. The Horizontal Effect Revolution and the Question of Sovereignty (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Pieter, van Hoof, Fried, van Rijn, Arjen, and Zwaak, Leo (eds.). Theory and Practice of the European Convention of Human Rights, 5th ed. (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2018).Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Viroli, Maurizio. For Love of Country (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Viroli, Maurizio. “Which Patriotism for Europe?” Eutopia Magazine, August 5, 2014.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan. The Making of the Civil Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Webster, McKenzie. “The Warren Court’s Struggle with the Sit-In Cases and the Constitutionality of Segregation in Places of Public Accommodations.” Journal of Law and Politics 17 (2001), 373408.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Herbert. “Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law.” Harvard Law Review 73:1 (1959), 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieacker, Franz. Privatrechtsgeschichte der Neuzeit, 2nd ed. (Göttinggen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1967).Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. The Creation of the American Republic (Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. Empire of Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Woodward-Burns, Robinson. Hidden Laws: How State Constitutions Stabilize American Politics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Woolman, Stuart. “The Amazing Vanishing Bill of Rights.” South African Law Journal 127 (2007), 762794.Google Scholar
Woolman, Stuart, and Davis, Dennis. “The Last Laugh: Du Plessis v. De Klerk, Classical Liberalism, Creole Liberalism and the Application of Fundamental Rights under the Interim and the Final Constitutions.” South African Journal on Human Rights 12 (1996), 361404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrase, Michael. “Anti-discrimination Law and Legal Culture in Germany.” In Havelková, Barbara and Möschel, Mathias (eds.), Anti-discrimination Law in Civil Law Jurisdictions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019), 136154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zackin, Emily. Looking for Rights in All the Wrong Places: Why State Constitutions Contain America’s Positive Rights (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Zitzke, Emile. “A Decolonial Critique of Private Law and Human Rights.” South African Journal on Human Rights 34:3 (2018), 492516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckert, Michael. Natural Rights and the New Republicanism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Zweigert, K., and Kotz, H.. An Introduction to Comparative Law. Translated by Tony Weir (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Christina R. Bambrick, University of Notre Dame, Indiana
  • Book: Constitutionalizing the Private Sphere
  • Online publication: 23 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009293723.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Christina R. Bambrick, University of Notre Dame, Indiana
  • Book: Constitutionalizing the Private Sphere
  • Online publication: 23 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009293723.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Christina R. Bambrick, University of Notre Dame, Indiana
  • Book: Constitutionalizing the Private Sphere
  • Online publication: 23 January 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009293723.011
Available formats
×