Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:00:55.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Coming Clean but Playing Dirtier: The Shortcomings of Disclosure as a Solution to Conflicts of Interest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Daylian M. Cain
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University
George Loewenstein
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University
Don A. Moore
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University
Don A. Moore
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
Daylian M. Cain
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
George Loewenstein
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
Max H. Bazerman
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Conflicts of Interest
Challenges and Solutions in Business, Law, Medicine, and Public Policy
, pp. 104 - 125
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, R. P., and Levi, A. (1985). Decision making and decision theory. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, 3rd edition, Vol. 1 (pp. 231–310). New York: Random House
Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for lemons: Qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, 488–500CrossRef
Allport, F. H., and Lepkin, M. (1945). Wartime rumors of waste and special privilege: Why some people believe them. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 40, 3–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Association of Universities. (2001). Report on individual and institutional financial conflict of interest. http://www.aau.edu/research/coi.01.pdf
American Medical Association. (2002, July 22). Code of medical ethics, section E-8.03, Available: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/8469.html
Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., Issacharoff, S., and Camerer, C. (1995). Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining. American Economic Review, 85(5), 1337–1343Google Scholar
Bazerman, M. H., Loewenstein, G., and Moore, D. A. (2002). Why good accountants do bad audits. Harvard Business Review, 80(1), 87–102Google ScholarPubMed
Brehmer, B. (1980). In one word: Not from experience. Acta Psychologica, 45, 223–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, D. M. (2004). Low quality compliance: Regulating behavior off the books. Unpublished manuscript. Carnegie Mellon University
Cain, D. M., Loewenstein, G., and Moore, D. A. (forthcoming). The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Journal of Legal Studies
Cain, D. M., Loewenstein, G., and Moore, D. A. (2004). Honesty and its discontents: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Unpublished manuscript. Carnegie Mellon University
Camerer, C. (2000). Prospect theory in the wild. In D. Kahneman and A. Tversky (Eds.), Choice, values, and frames, (pp. 288–300). New York: Cambridge University Press
Camerer, C. and Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1), 7–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., and Weber, M. (1989). The curse of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 97(5), 1232–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellan, N. J. (1977). Decision making with multiple probabilistic cues. In N. Castellan, J. Pisoni, and M. Potts (Eds.), Cognitive Theory, Vol. 2 (pp. 288–300). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Chapman, G. B., and Bornstein, B. H. (1996). The more you ask for the more you get: Anchoring in personal injury verdicts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 519–5403.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, G. B., and Johnson, E. J. (1999). Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 115–153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choudhry, N. K., Stelfox, H. T., and Detsky, A. S. (2002). Relationships between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(5)Google ScholarPubMed
Crawford, V. P., and Sobel, J. (1982). Strategic information transmission. Econometrica, 50(6), 1431–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, J., and Loewenstein, G. (2003). A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290(2), 252–255CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, M. (2001). Introduction. In M. Davis and A. Stark (Eds.), Conflict of interest in the professions, (pp. 3–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Davis, M., and Stark, A. (2001). Conflict of interest in the professions. New York: Oxford University Press
Dutton, D. G., and Lake, R. A. (1973). Threat of own prejudice and reverse discrimination in interracial situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 94–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dye, R. A., (2001). An evaluation of essays on disclosure and the disclosure literature in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, (32), 181–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbesen, E. B., and Konečni, V. J. (1975). Decision making and information integration in the courts: The setting of bail. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 805–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einhorn, H. (1980). Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making. In T. S. Wallsten (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior, (pp 1–20). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates
Einhorn, H. and Hogarth, R. (1978). Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psychological Review, 35(5), 395–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., and Mussweiler, T. (2001). First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 657–669CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gigerenzer, G. (1991). How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond Heuristics and biases. In W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 83–115)CrossRef
Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46(2), 107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., and Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 21–38CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilovich, T. (1987). Secondhand information and social judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilovich, T. (1991). How we know what isn't so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York: Free Press
Gunderson, M. (1997). Eliminating conflicts of interest in managed care organizations through disclosure and consent. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 27, 5–15Google Scholar
Hastie, R., Schkade, D. A., and Payne, J. W. (1999). Juror judgments in civil cases: Effects of plaintiff's requests and plaintiff's identity on punitive damage awards. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 445–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, P., and Palepu, K. (2000). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Proceedings of the JAE Rochester Conference (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=258514)Google Scholar
Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 197–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, E. E., and Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassirer, J. P. (2003). Physicians' ties with the pharmaceutical industry: A critical element of a wildly successful marketing network. Unpublished manuscript. Boston: Tufts University
Keysar, B., Ginzel, L. E., and Bazerman, M. H. (1995). States of affairs and states of mind: The effect of knowledge of beliefs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(3), 283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klayman, J., and Ha, Y. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94(2), 211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krimsky, S., Rothenberg, L. (2001). Conflict of interest policies in science and medical journals: Editorial practices and author disclosures. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 205–218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunda, Z. (1987). Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 636–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewenstein, G., Moore, D. A., and Weber, R. (2003). Paying $1 to lose $2: Misperceptions of the value of information in predicting the performance of others. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings
Loftus, E. F. (1979). The malleability of human memory. American Scientist, 67(May–June), 312–320Google ScholarPubMed
Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., and Preston, E. (1984). Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1231–1243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messick, D. M., and Sentis, K. P. (1979). Fairness and preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 418–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaely, R. and Womack, K. L. (1999). Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations. Review of Financial Studies, 12, 653–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371–378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monin, B., and Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 33–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, D. A., and Loewenstein, G. (2004). Self-interest, automaticity, and the psychology of conflict of interest. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. A., Loewenstein, G., Tanlu, L., and Bazerman, M. H. (2003). Conflict of interest, and the unconscious intrusion of bias. Unpublished manuscript. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University
Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110(3), 472–489CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mussweiler, T., and Strack, F. (1999). Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(2), 136–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mussweiler, T., and Strack, F. (2001). Considering the impossible: Explaining the effects of implausible anchors. Social Cognition, 19, 145–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., and Pfeiffer, T. (2000). Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: Considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1142–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northcraft, G. B., and Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 84–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., and Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratkanis, A. R., Greenwald, A. G., Leippe, M. R., and Baumgardner, M. H. (1988). In search of reliable persuasion effects: The sleeper effect is dead: Long live the sleeper effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 203–218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social psychology, (Vol. 10, pp. 173–220). New York: AcademicCrossRef
Ross, L., and Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill
Russo, J. E., and Shoemaker, P. J. H. (1989). Decision traps. New York: Simon and Schuster
SEC. (2000, September 13). Hearing on auditor independence. Available: http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s71300/testimony/shamis1.htm
Skurnik, I., Moskowitz, G. B., and Johnson, M. (2002). Biases in remembering true and false information: The illusions of truth and falseness. Unpublished manuscript. University of Toronto
Skurnik, I., Park, D. C., and Schwarz, N. (2002). How warnings become recommendations: Paradoxical effects of health warnings on beliefs of older adults. Unpublished manuscript. University of Michigan
Strack, F., and Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strack, F., and Mussweiler, T. (in press). Resisting influence: Judgmental correction and its goals. In J. P. Forgas and K. Williams (Eds.), The Sydney symposium of social psychology: Social influence. Cambridge University Press
Surowiecki, J. (2002). The financial page: The talking cure. The New Yorker Magazine, Dec. 9, 54Google Scholar
Tenery, R. M. (2000). Interactions between physicians and the health care technology industry. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(3), 391–393CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 25, pp. 331–376). New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Thaler, R. H. (1991). The Psychology and Economics Conference Handbook. Quasi rational economics, (pp. 189–195). New York: Russell Sage Foundation
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valins, S. (1966). Cognitive effects of false heart-rate feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(4), 400–408CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vickers, M., France, M., Thornton, E., Henry, D., Timmons, H., and McNamee, M. (2002, May 13). How corrupt is Wall Street? Business Week
Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 97–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101(1), 34–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, T. D., Houston, C., Etling, K. M., and Brekke, N. (1996). A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 387–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×