Commentary on the Third Geneva Convention Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War
Book contents
- Commentary on the Third Geneva Convention
- International Committee of the Red Cross
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Foreword by Peter Maurer
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Preamble
- Part I General Provisions
- Article 1 Respect for the Convention
- Article 2 Application of the Convention
- Article 3 Conflicts not of an international character
- Article 4 Prisoners of war
- Article 5 Beginning and end of application
- Article 6 Special agreements
- Article 7 Non-Renunciation of Rights
- Article 8 Protecting Powers
- Article 9 Activities of the ICRC and Other Impartial Humanitarian Organizations
- Article 10 Substitutes for Protecting Powers
- Article 11 Conciliation Procedure
- Part II General Protection of Prisoners of War
- Part III Captivity
- Part IV Termination of Captivity
- Part V Information Bureaux and Relief Societies for Prisoners of War
- Part VI Execution of the Convention
- Book part
- Sources
- Index
- References
Article 1 - Respect for the Convention
from Part I - General Provisions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 August 2021
Compiled by
Book contents
- Commentary on the Third Geneva Convention
- International Committee of the Red Cross
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Foreword by Peter Maurer
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Preamble
- Part I General Provisions
- Article 1 Respect for the Convention
- Article 2 Application of the Convention
- Article 3 Conflicts not of an international character
- Article 4 Prisoners of war
- Article 5 Beginning and end of application
- Article 6 Special agreements
- Article 7 Non-Renunciation of Rights
- Article 8 Protecting Powers
- Article 9 Activities of the ICRC and Other Impartial Humanitarian Organizations
- Article 10 Substitutes for Protecting Powers
- Article 11 Conciliation Procedure
- Part II General Protection of Prisoners of War
- Part III Captivity
- Part IV Termination of Captivity
- Part V Information Bureaux and Relief Societies for Prisoners of War
- Part VI Execution of the Convention
- Book part
- Sources
- Index
- References
Summary
In the very first article of each of the four 1949 Geneva Conventions, the HighContracting Parties ‘undertake to respect and to ensure respect for the presentConvention in all circumstances’. This clause attests to the special characterof the Conventions, a great many of whose rules give expression to ‘elementaryconsiderations of humanity’. The High Contracting Parties therefore deemed itappropriate to explicitly reiterate the general principle that the Conventionsare binding upon its Parties, which have ‘to respect’ them. Moreover, the HighContracting Parties commit themselves to do everything reasonably in their power‘to ensure respect’ for the Conventions. The phrase ‘to respect and to ensurerespect’ applies first and foremost to the High Contracting Parties themselves,their armed forces, other persons and groups acting on their behalf, and theirpopulations as a whole.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Commentary on the Third Geneva ConventionConvention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, pp. 47 - 80Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Select bibliography
Azzam, Fateh, ‘The Duty
of Third States to Implement and Enforce International Humanitarian
Law’, Nordic Journal of International
Law, Vol. 66, No. 1,
1997, pp.
55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benvenuti, Paolo, ‘Ensuring Observance of
International Humanitarian Law: Function, Extent and Limits of the
Obligations of Third States to Ensure Respect of IHL’, Yearbook of the International Institute of Humanitarian Law,
1989–90, pp. 27–55.Google Scholar
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence and Condorelli, Luigi, ‘Common
Article 1 of the Geneva Conventions revisited: Protecting collective
interests’, International Review of the Red
Cross, Vol. 82, No. 837, March
2000, pp.
67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence and Condorelli, Luigi, ‘De la
“responsabilité de protéger”, ou d’une nouvelle parure pour une notion
déjà bien établie’, Revue générale de droit
international public, Vol. 110, No.
1, 2006, pp.
11–18.Google Scholar
Boivin, Alexandra,
‘Complicity and beyond: International law and the transfer
of small arms and light weapons’, International
Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 87, No.
859, September 2005, pp.
467–496.Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael, Partsch, Karl
Josef and Solf, Waldemar
A., New Rules for Victims of Armed
Conflicts: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva
Conventions of 1949, Martinus Nijhoff
Publishers, The Hague,
1982, pp.
43–44.Google Scholar
Brehm, Maya, ‘The Arms
Trade and States’ Duty to Ensure Respect for Humanitarian and Human Rights
Law’, Journal of Conflict and Security
Law, Vol. 12, No. 3,
2007, pp.
359–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colassis, Laurent, ‘The Role
of the International Committee of the Red Cross in Stability
Operations’, in ‘Pete’ Pedrozo, Raul A. (ed.), The War in
Iraq: A Legal Analysis, International Law Studies,
U.S. Naval War College, Vol. 86,
2010, pp.
457–476.Google Scholar
Condorelli, Luigi and Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence,
‘Quelques remarques à propos de l’obligation des Etats de
“respecter et faire respecter” le droit international humanitaire “en
toutes circonstances”’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Etudes et essais
sur le droit humanitaire et sur les principes de la Croix-Rouge en
l’honneur de Jean Pictet, ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff
Publishers, The Hague,
1984, pp.
17–35.Google Scholar
David, Eric, Principes de droit
des conflits armés, 6th edition,
Bruylant,
Brussels, 2019, paras
3.11–3.20.Google Scholar
Devillard, Alexandre,
‘L’obligation de faire respecter le droit international
humanitaire: l’article 1 commun aux Conventions de Genève et à leur
premier Protocole additionnel, fondement d’un droit international
humanitaire de coopération?’, Revue québécoise de
droit international, Vol. 20, No.
2, 2007, pp.
75–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörmann, Knut and Serralvo, Jose, ‘Common
Article 1 to the Geneva Conventions and the obligation to prevent
international humanitarian law violations’,
International Review of the Red Cross, Vol.
96, No. 895–896, December
2014, pp.
707–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, Brian, ‘Keynote Address:
International Law, Legal Diplomacy, and the Counter-ISIL Campaign: Some
Observations’, Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law,
Washington, D.C., 1 April 2016, reprinted in International Law Studies, Vol. 92, 2016, http://stockton.usnwc.edu/ils/vol92/iss1/7/.Google Scholar
Engdahl, Ola, ‘Compliance
with International Humanitarian Law in Multinational Peace
Operations’, Nordic Journal of International
Law, Vol. 78, No. 4,
2009, pp.
513–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleck, Dieter,
‘International Accountability for Violations of the Ius in Bello: The Impact of the ICRC Study on
Customary International Humanitarian Law’, Journal
of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 11, No.
2, 2006, pp.
179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Focarelli, Carlo, ‘Common
Article 1 of the 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Soap Bubble?’,
European Journal of International Law, Vol.
21, No. 1, 2010, pp.
125–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frutig, Andreas, Die Pflicht von
Drittstaaten zur Durchsetzung des humanitären Völkerrechts nach Art. 1 der
Genfer Konventionen von 1949, Helbing Lichtenhahn
Verlag, Basel,
2009.Google Scholar
Gasser, Hans-Peter,
‘Ensuring Respect for the Geneva Conventions and Protocols:
The Role of Third States and the United Nations’, in
Fox, Hazel and Meyer, Michael
A. (eds), Armed Conflict and
the New Law, Vol. II: Effecting Compliance, The
British Institute of International and Comparative Law,
London, 1993, pp.
15–49.Google Scholar
Geiss, Robin, ‘The
Obligation to Respect and to Ensure Respect for the
Conventions’, in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds), The 1949 Geneva
Conventions: A Commentary, Oxford University
Press, 2015, pp.
111–134. (2015a)Google Scholar
Geiss, Robin, ‘Common
Article 1 of the Geneva Conventions: scope and content of the obligation
to “ensure respect” – “narrow but deep” or “wide and
shallow”?’, in Krieger, Heike (ed.), Inducing
Compliance with International Humanitarian Law: Lessons from the African
Great Lakes Region, Cambridge University
Press, 2015, pp.
417–441. (2015b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Happold, Matthew, ‘Comment
– obligations of States contributing to UN peacekeeping missions under
Common Article 1 of the Geneva Conventions’, in
Krieger, Heike (ed.), Inducing
Compliance with International Humanitarian Law: Lessons from the African
Great Lakes Region, Cambridge University
Press, 2015, pp.
382–398.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary
International Humanitarian Law, Volume I: Rules,
ICRC/Cambridge University Press,
2005, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits, ‘The
Undertaking to Respect and Ensure Respect in All Circumstances: From Tiny
Seed to Ripening Fruit’, Yearbook of International
Humanitarian Law, Vol. 2, 1999, pp.
3–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Birgit, Die Durchsetzung
der Genfer Abkommen von 1949 in nicht-internationalen bewaffneten
Konflikten auf Grundlage ihres gemeinsamen Art. 1,
Duncker & Humblot,
Berlin, 2001.
(2001a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Birgit, ‘The duty
to “ensure respect” under common Article 1 of the Geneva Conventions: its
implications on international and non-international armed
conflicts’, German Yearbook of International
Law, Vol. 44, 2001, pp.
498–516. (2001b)Google Scholar
Koivurova, Timo, ‘Due
Diligence’, version of February 2010, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck
Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford
University Press, http://www.mpepil.com.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert,
‘Commentaires iconoclastes sur l’obligation de faire
respecter le droit international humanitaire selon l’article 1 commun des
Conventions de Genève de 1949’, Revue belge de
droit international, Vol. 46, No.
2, 2013, pp.
513–520.Google Scholar
Kolb, Robert, Porretto, Gabriele and Vité, Sylvain, L’application
du droit international humanitaire et des droits de l’homme aux
organisations internationales: Forces de paix et administrations civiles
transitoires, Bruylant,
Brussels,
2005.Google Scholar
Levrat, Nicolas, ‘Les
conséquences de l’engagement pris par les Hautes Parties contractantes de
“faire respecter” les Conventions humanitaires’, in
Kalshoven, Frits and Sandoz, Yves (eds), Mise en œuvre du
droit international humanitaire, Martinus Nijhoff
Publishers, Dordrecht,
1989, pp.
263–296.Google Scholar
Momtaz, Djamchid, ‘L’engagement des Etats à “faire respecter” le droit international
humanitaire par les parties aux conflits armés’, in Actes du Colloque de
Bruges, Améliorer le respect du Droit International Humanitaire,
11–12 septembre 2003, Collegium No. 30, Summer 2004, pp.
27–34.Google Scholar
Momtaz, Djamchid, ‘Les
défis des conflits armés asymétriques et identitaires au droit
international humanitaire’, in Matheson, Michael
J. and Momtaz, Djamchid (eds), Les règles et
institutions du droit international humanitaire à l’épreuve des conflits
armés récents, Martinus Nijhoff
Publishers, Leiden,
2010, pp. 3–137, at
70–101.Google Scholar
Moulier, Isabelle,
‘L’obligation de “faire respecter” le droit international
humanitaire’, in Matheson, Michael J. and Momtaz, Djamchid (eds), Les règles et
institutions du droit international humanitaire à l’épreuve des conflits
armés récents, Martinus Nijhoff
Publishers, Leiden,
2010, pp.
725–783.Google Scholar
Naert, Frederik, International
Law Aspects of the EU’s Security and Defence Policy, with a Particular
Focus on the Law of Armed Conflict and Human Rights,
Intersentia,
Antwerp,
2010.Google Scholar
Ney, Paul,
Remarks by Department of Defense General Counsel Paul C. Ney Jr. at the
Israel Defense Forces 3rd International Conference on the Law of Armed
Conflict, 28 May 2019.Google Scholar
Niyungeko, Gérard, ‘The
implementation of international humanitarian law and the principle of
State sovereignty’, International Review of the
Red Cross, Vol. 31, No. 281,
April 1991, pp.
105–133.Google Scholar
Obradović, Konstantin, ‘Que
faire face aux violations du droit humanitaire? Quelques réflexions sur le
rôle possible du CICR’, in Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Etudes et essais
sur le droit international humanitaire et sur les principes de la
Croix-Rouge en l’honneur de Jean Pictet,
ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,
The Hague, 1984, pp.
483–494.Google Scholar
Palwankar, Umesh, ‘Measures
available to States for fulfilling their obligation to ensure respect for
international humanitarian law’, International
Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 34, No.
298, February 1994, pp.
9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfanner, Toni, ‘Various
mechanisms and approaches for implementing international humanitarian law
and protecting and assisting war victims’,
International Review of the Red Cross, Vol.
91, No. 874, June 2009, pp.
279–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisillo-Mazzeschi, Riccardo, ‘The
Due Diligence Rule and the Nature of the International Responsibility of
States’, German Yearbook of International
Law, Vol. 35, 1992, pp.
9–51.Google Scholar
Reid, John,
‘Ensuring respect: the role of State practice in interpreting the Geneva
Conventions’, ILA Reporter,
2017.Google Scholar
Robson, Verity, ‘The
Common Approach to Article 1: The Scope of Each State’s Obligation to
Ensure Respect for the Geneva Conventions’,
Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol.
25, No. 1, Spring 2020, pp.
101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryngaert, Cedric and Van de Meulebroucke, Anneleen,
‘Enhancing and Enforcing Compliance with International
Humanitarian Law by Non-State Armed Groups: an Inquiry into some
Mechanisms’, Journal of Conflict & Security
Law, Vol. 16, No. 3,
2011, pp.
443–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryniker, Anne, ‘The ICRC’s
position on “humanitarian intervention”‘,
International Review of the Red Cross, Vol.
83, No. 842, June 2001, pp.
527–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachariew, Kamen, ‘States’
entitlement to take action to enforce international humanitarian
law’, International Review of the Red
Cross, Vol. 29, No. 270, June
1989, pp.
177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandoz, Yves, ‘Appel du
C.I.C.R. dans le cadre du conflit entre l’Irak et l’Iran’,
Annuaire français de droit international, Vol.
29, No. 1, 1983, pp.
161–173.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘State
responsibility for violations of international humanitarian
law’, International Review of the Red
Cross, Vol. 84, No. 846, June
2002, pp.
401–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, Bouvier, Antoine
A. and Quintin, Anne, How Does Law
Protect in War?, Vol. I, 3rd edition,
ICRC,
Geneva, 2011, pp.
368–372.Google Scholar
Shraga, Daphna, ‘The
United Nations as an Actor Bound by International Humanitarian
Law’, International Peacekeeping, Vol.
5, No. 2, 1998, pp.
64–81.Google Scholar
Shraga, Daphna, ‘The
Secretary-General’s Bulletin on the Observance by United Nations Forces of
International Humanitarian Law: A Decade Later’,
Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Vol.
39, 2009, pp.
357–377.Google Scholar
Tonkin, Hannah, ‘Common
Article 1: A Minimum Yardstick for Regulating Private Military and
Security Companies’, Leiden Journal of
International Law, Vol. 22, No.
4, December 2009, pp.
779–799.Google Scholar
Vöneky, Silja,
‘Implementation and Enforcement of International
Humanitarian Law’, in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of
International Humanitarian Law, 3rd edition,
Oxford University Press,
2013, pp.
647–700.Google Scholar
Zwanenburg, Marten, Accountability of
Peace Support Operations, Martinus Nijhoff
Publishers, Leiden,
2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zych, Tomasz, ‘The Scope
of the Obligation to Respect and to Ensure Respect for International
Humanitarian Law’, Windsor Yearbook of Access to
Justice, Vol. 27, No. 2,
2009, pp.
251–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar