Book contents
- Collective Self-Defence in International Law
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 184
- Collective Self-Defence in International Law
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Treaties
- Table of Cases and Arbitral Awards
- Introduction
- 1 Delineating Collective Self-Defence
- 2 The History and Development of Collective Self-Defence
- 3 The Requirements Shared by Individual and Collective Self-Defence
- 4 The Purported Declaration and Request Requirements for Collective Self-Defence
- 5 The Issuer of a Collective Self-Defence Request
- 6 The Manner and Form of a Collective Self-Defence Request
- 7 Collective Self-Defence Treaty Arrangements
- 8 The Relationship between Collective Self-Defence and Military Assistance on Request
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2024
Book contents
- Collective Self-Defence in International Law
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 184
- Collective Self-Defence in International Law
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Treaties
- Table of Cases and Arbitral Awards
- Introduction
- 1 Delineating Collective Self-Defence
- 2 The History and Development of Collective Self-Defence
- 3 The Requirements Shared by Individual and Collective Self-Defence
- 4 The Purported Declaration and Request Requirements for Collective Self-Defence
- 5 The Issuer of a Collective Self-Defence Request
- 6 The Manner and Form of a Collective Self-Defence Request
- 7 Collective Self-Defence Treaty Arrangements
- 8 The Relationship between Collective Self-Defence and Military Assistance on Request
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Collective Self-Defence in International Law , pp. 321 - 348Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Primary Sources
Alder, Murray Colin, The Inherent Right of Self-Defence in International Law (Dordrecht, Springer, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexandrov, Stanimir A., Self-Defence against the Use of Force in International Law (The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1996)Google Scholar
Arend, Anthony Clark, and Beck, Robert J., International Law and the Use of Force (London, Routledge, 1993)Google Scholar
Armstrong, David, Farrell, Theo, and Maiguashca, Bice (eds.), Force and Legitimacy in World Politics (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Aronsson-Storrier, Marie, Publicity in International Law-Making: Covert Operations and the Use of Force (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2020)Google Scholar
Beckett, W. Eric, The North Atlantic Treaty, the Brussels Treaty, and the Charter of the United Nations (London, Stevens & Sons, 1950)Google Scholar
Bhuta, Nehal, and Vallejo, Rodrigo (eds.), Global Governance and Human Rights (Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law) (Oxford, Oxford University Press, in press)Google Scholar
Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1765–1769)Google Scholar
Bowett, Derek W., Self-Defense in International Law (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1958)Google Scholar
Brecher, Michael, A Century of Crisis and Conflict in the International System (Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017)Google Scholar
Briggs, Asa, and Clavin, Patricia, Modern Europe, 1789–Present (London, Routledge, 2nd ed., 2013)Google Scholar
Bronitt, Simon, Gani, Miriam, and Hufnagel, Saskia (eds.), Shooting to Kill: Socio-legal Perspectives on the Use of Lethal Force (Oxford, Hart, 2012)Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian, International Law and the Use of Force by States (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1963)Google Scholar
Buchan, Russell, and Tsagourias, Nicholas, Regulating the Use of Force in International Law: Stability and Change (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey-Maslen, Stuart, Jus ad Bellum: The Law on Inter-state Use of Force (Oxford, Hart, 2020)Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio (ed.), The Current Legal Regulation of the Use of Force (Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 1986)Google Scholar
Chen, Albert H. Y. (ed.), Constitutionalism in Asia in the Early Twenty-First Century (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Chinkin, Christine, and Kaldor, Mary, International Law and New Wars (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Clark, John F. (ed.), The African Stakes of the Congo War (New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002)Google Scholar
Constantinou, Avra, The Right of Self-Defence under Customary International Law and Article 51 of the UN Charter (Brussels, Bruylant, 2000)Google Scholar
Corten, Olivier, The Law against War: The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law (Oxford, Hart, 2nd ed., 2021)Google Scholar
Corten, Olivier, Fox, Gregory H., and Kritsiotis, Dino, Armed Intervention and Consent, Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War (Peters, Anne and Marxsen, Christian, series eds.), vol. IV (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2023)Google Scholar
Cunningham, Anne C., Critical Perspectives on Government-Sponsored Assassinations (New York, Enslow, 2018)Google Scholar
Damrosch, Lori Fisler, and Scheffer, David J. (eds.), Law and Force in the New International Order (Boulder, Westview Press, 1991)Google Scholar
de Nooy, Gert (ed.), The Role of European Naval Forces after the Cold War (The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1996)Google Scholar
de Vattel, Emer, The Law of Nations (Droit des gens) (Kapossy, Béla and Whatmore, Richard, eds., Thomas Nugent, trans., Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 2008 (1758))Google Scholar
de Wet, Erika, Military Assistance on Request and the Use of Force (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2020)Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, War, Aggression and Self-Defence (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 6th ed., 2017)Google Scholar
Djalili, Mohammad-Reza, Grare, Frédéric, and Akiner, Shirin (eds.), Tajikistan: The Trials of Independence (Richmond, Curzon Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Eichler, Jan, NATO’s Expansion after the Cold War: Geopolitics and Impacts for International Security (Cham, Springer, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyffinger, Arthur, Stephens, Alan, and Muller, Sam (eds.), Self-Defence as a Fundamental Principle (The Hague, Hague Academic Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Elias, Olufemi, and Merkouris, Panos (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On (Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 2010)Google Scholar
Fletcher, George, and Ohlin, Jens, Defending Humanity: When Force Is Justified and Why (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Forcese, Craig, Destroying the Caroline: The Frontier Raid that Reshaped the Right to War (Toronto, Irwin Law, 2018)Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., Recourse to Force: State Action against Threats and Armed Attacks (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Friman, Johanna, Revisiting the Concept of Defence in the Jus ad Bellum: The Dual Face of Defence (Oxford, Hart, 2017)Google Scholar
Gardam, Judith, Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Gazzini, Tarcisio, The Changing Rules on the Use of Force in International Law (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Goodrich, Leland M., Simons, Anne Patricia, and Hambro, Edvard, Charter of the United Nations: Commentary and Documents (New York, Columbia University Press, 3rd ed., 1969)Google Scholar
Gray, Christine, International Law and the Use of Force (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 4th ed., 2018)Google Scholar
Green, James A., The International Court of Justice and Self-Defence in International Law (Oxford, Hart, 2009)Google Scholar
Green, James A. (ed.), Cyber Warfare: A Multidisciplinary Analysis (Abingdon, Routledge, 2015)Google Scholar
Green, James A., and Waters, Christopher P. M. (eds.), Conflict in the Caucasus: Implications for International Legal Order (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2010)Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, On the Law of War and Peace (De juri belli ac pacis libri tres) (Tuck, Richard, ed. / Barbeyrac, Jean, original ed. & French trans., John Morrice, English trans., Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 2005 (1625))Google Scholar
Hasar, Seyfullah, State Consent to Foreign Military Intervention during Civil Wars (Leiden, Brill Nijhoff, 2022)Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A., and Shapiro, Scott J., The Internationalists (London, Penguin Books, 2018)Google Scholar
Heathcote, Gina, The Law on the Use of Force: A Feminist Analysis (Abingdon, Routledge, 2012)Google Scholar
Henderson, Christian, The Persistent Advocate and the Use of Force: The Impact of the United States upon the Jus ad Bellum in the Post-Cold War Era (Farnham, Ashgate, 2010)Google Scholar
Henderson, Christian, The Use of Force and International Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018)Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, The Development of International Law through the Political Organs of the United Nations (London, Oxford University Press, 1963)Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Ismay (Lord), , NATO: The First Five Years, 1949–1954 (Paris, North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, 1955)Google Scholar
Jackson, Miles, Complicity in International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Kassimeris, George, and Buckley, John (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Modern Warfare (Farnham, Ashgate, 2010)Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005 reissue)Google Scholar
Koutrakos, Panos (ed.), European Foreign Policy: Legal and Political Perspectives (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2011)Google Scholar
Koutrakos, Panos, The EU Common Security and Defence Policy (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Lanovoy, Vladyslav, Complicity and Its Limits in the Law of International Responsibility (Oxford, Hart, 2016)Google Scholar
Lawson, Ruth C., International Regional Organizations: Constitutional Foundations (New York, Praeger, 1962)Google Scholar
Lepard, Brian D. (ed.), Reexamining Customary International Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Lieblich, Eliav, International Law and Civil Wars: Intervention and Consent (Abingdon, Routledge, 2013)Google Scholar
Lubell, Noam, Extraterritorial Use of Force against Non-State Actors (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Martin, Andrew, Collective Security: A Progress Report (Paris, United Nations (UNESCO), 1952)Google Scholar
Matsui, Shigenori, The Constitution of Japan: A Contextual Analysis (London, Hart, 2011)Google Scholar
McDermott, Kevin, and Stibbe, Matthew (eds.), Eastern Europe in 1968 (Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018)Google Scholar
McDougal, Myres S., and Feliciano, Florentino P., Law and Minimum World Public Order: The Legal Regulation of International Coercion (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1961)Google Scholar
McWhinney, Edward, The September 11 Terrorist Attacks and the Invasion of Iraq in Contemporary International Law: Opinions on the Emerging New World Order System (Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 2004)Google Scholar
Meiertöns, Heiko, The Doctrines of US Security Policy: An Evaluation under International Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York, McGraw-Hill, 7th ed., revised by Thompson, Kenneth W. and David Clinton, W., 2005)Google Scholar
Mori, Tadashi, Origins of the Right of Self-Defence in International Law: From the Caroline Incident to the United Nations Charter (Leiden, Brill Nijhoff, 2018)Google Scholar
Neff, Stephen C., War and the Law of Nations: A General History (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Notter, Harley A., Postwar Foreign Policy Preparation, 1939–1945 (Washington DC, Greenwood Press, 1975)Google Scholar
O’Connell, Mary Ellen, Tams, Christian J., and Tladi, Dire, Self-Defence against Non-State Actors, Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War (Peters, Anne and Marxsen, Christian, series eds.), vol. I (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2019)Google Scholar
O’Meara, Chris, Necessity and Proportionality and the Right of Self-Defence in International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2021)Google Scholar
Okimoto, Keiichiro, The Distinction and Relationship between Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello (Oxford, Hart, 2011)Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, Peremptory Norms in International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, Collective Security (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Paddeu, Federica, Justification and Excuse in International Law: Concept and Theory of General Defences (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018)Google Scholar
Piris, Jean-Claude, The Lisbon Treaty: A Legal and Political Analysis (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Powell, Nathaniel K., France’s Wars in Chad: Military Intervention and Decolonisation in Africa (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Ragazzi, Maurizio, The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Redaelli, Chiara, Intervention in Civil Wars: Effectiveness, Legitimacy, and Human Rights (Oxford, Hart, 2021)Google Scholar
Redslob, Robert, Traité de droit des gens: l’évolution historique, les institutions positives, les idées de justice, le droit nouveau (Paris, Recueil Sirey, 1950)Google Scholar
Rotelle, John E. (ed.), The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century, Part II – Letters, vol. 1, Letters 1–99 (Hyde Park, NY, New City Press, 2001) (398 AD) (Roland Teske, trans. & notes)Google Scholar
Roth, Brad R., Governmental Illegitimacy in International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Rozanov, Anatoliy A., and Douhan, Alena F., Collective Security Treaty Organisation, 2002–2012 (Geneva/Minsk, The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2013)Google Scholar
Ruys, Tom, ‘Armed Attack’ and Article 51 of the UN Charter: Evolutions in Customary Law and Practice (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Ruys, Tom, and Corten, Olivier (with Hofer, Alexandra) (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018)Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, International Law in Theory and Practice (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff, 1991)Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas, Arms and Influence (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1966 (Veritas paperback ed., 2020))Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Nolte, Georg, Paulus, Andreas, and Wessendorf, Nikolai (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, vol. II (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 3rd ed., 2012)Google Scholar
Stallybrass, W. T. S., Salmond’s Law of Torts (London, Sweet and Maxwell, 10th ed., 1945)Google Scholar
Stone, Julius, Aggression and World Order (Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1958)Google Scholar
Stone, Julius, Legal Controls of International Conflict: A Treatise on the Dynamics of Disputes and War-Law, second impression, revised with supplement 1953–1958 (Sydney, Maitland Publications, 1959)Google Scholar
Talmon, Stefan, Recognition of Governments in International Law: With Particular Reference to Governments in Exile (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Tanca, Antonio, Foreign Armed Intervention in Internal Conflict (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff, 1993)Google Scholar
Tibori-Szabó, Kinga, Anticipatory Action in Self-Defence: Essence and Limits under International Law (The Hague, TMC Asser Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Tsagourias, Nicholas, and White, Nigel D., Collective Security: Theory, Law and Practice (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Tzouvala, Ntina, Capitalism as Civilisation: A History of International Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2020)Google Scholar
Upcher, James, Neutrality in Contemporary International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2020Google Scholar
van Oudenaren, John, Détente in Europe: The Soviet Union and the West Since 1953 (Durham, Duke University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
von Pufendorf, Samuel, The Whole Duty of Man According to the Law of Nature (De officio hominis & civis juxta legem naturalem libri duo) (Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David, eds. / Barbeyrac, Jean, original ed. & French trans., Andrew Tooke, English trans., Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 2003 (1673))Google Scholar
Weller, Marc (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Westra, Joel H., International Law and the Use of Armed Force: The UN Charter and the Major Powers (Abingdon, Routledge, 2007)Google Scholar
White, Nigel D., and Henderson, Christian (eds.), Research Handbook on International Conflict and Security Law: Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello and Jus Post Bellum (Abingdon, Routledge, 2013)Google Scholar
Wilén, Nina, Justifying Interventions in Africa: (De)Stabilizing Sovereignty in Liberia, Burundi and the Congo (London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012)Google Scholar
Williams, Kieran, The Prague Spring and Its Aftermath: Czechoslovak Politics, 1968–1970 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Williamson, Myra, Terrorism, War and International Law: The Legality of the Use of Force against Afghanistan in 2001 (Farnham, Ashgate, 2009)Google Scholar
Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012) (online version, https://opil.ouplaw.com/home/mpil)Google Scholar
Wolfrum, Rüdiger, and Philipp, Christiane E. (eds.), United Nations: Law, Policies and Practice, vol. II (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff, 1995)Google Scholar
Wouters, Jan, Hoffmeister, Frank, de Baere, Geert, and Ramopoulos, Thomas, The Law of EU External Relations: Cases, Materials, and Commentary on the EU as an International Legal Actor (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 3rd ed., 2021)Google Scholar
[no designated editor] Right v. Might (New York, Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Besson, Samantha, ‘Sovereignty’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law, vol. IX (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012), 366Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael, ‘Neutrality, Concept and General Rules’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law, vol. VII (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012), 617Google Scholar
Brown, Bess A., ‘The Civil War in Tajikistan, 1992–1993’, in Djalili, Mohammad-Reza, Grare, Frédéric, and Akiner, Shirin (eds.), Tajikistan: The Trials of Independence (Richmond, Curzon Press, 1998), 86Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, ‘Geopolitical Change and International Law’, in Armstrong, David, Farrell, Theo, and Maiguashca, Bice (eds.), Force and Legitimacy in World Politics (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005), 51Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, ‘The Use of Force in the Persian Gulf’, in Damrosch, Lori Fisler and Scheffer, David J. (eds.), Law and Force in the New International Order (Boulder, Westview Press, 1991), 3Google Scholar
Cliteur, Paul, ‘Self-Defence and Terrorism’, in Eyffinger, Arthur, Stephens, Alan, and Muller, Sam (eds.), Self-Defence as a Fundamental Principle (The Hague, Hague Academic Press, 2009), 67Google Scholar
Corten, Olivier, ‘Intervention by Invitation: The Expanding Role of the Security Council’, in Corten, Olivier, Fox, Gregory H., and Kritsiotis, Dino, Armed Intervention and Consent, Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War (Peters, Anne and Marxsen, Christian, series eds.), vol. IV (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2023), 101Google Scholar
Daniel, Donald, and Hayes, Bradd, ‘Toward a West European Navy: Organizational and Operational Issues’, in de Nooy, Gert (ed.), The Role of European Naval Forces after the Cold War (The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1996), 73Google Scholar
Deeks, Ashley S., ‘Taming the Doctrine of Pre-emption’, in Weller, Marc (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015), 661Google Scholar
Eyffinger, Arthur, ‘Self-Defence or the Meanderings of a Protean Principle’, in Eyffinger, Arthur, Stephens, Alan, and Muller, Sam (eds.), Self-Defence as a Fundamental Principle (The Hague, Hague Academic Press, 2009), 103Google Scholar
Fox, Gregory H., ‘Intervention by Invitation’, in Weller, Marc (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015), 816Google Scholar
Fox, Gregory H., ‘Invitations to Intervene after the Cold War: Toward a New Collective Model’, in Corten, Olivier, Fox, Gregory H., and Kritsiotis, Dino, Armed Intervention and Consent, Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War (Peters, Anne and Marxsen, Christian, series eds.), vol. IV (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2023), 179Google Scholar
Gardner, Richard N., ‘Commentary on the Law of Self-Defence’, in Damrosch, Lori Fisler and Scheffer, David J. (eds.), Law and Force in the New International Order (Boulder, Westview Press, 1991), 49Google Scholar
Green, James A., ‘Passportisation, Peacekeepers and Proportionality: The Russian Claim of the Protection of Nationals Abroad in Self-Defence’, in Green, James A. and Waters, Christopher P. M. (eds.), Conflict in the Caucasus: Implications for International Legal Order (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), 54Google Scholar
Green, James A., ‘The Regulation of Cyber Warfare under the Jus ad Bellum’, in Green, James A. (ed.), Cyber Warfare: A Multidisciplinary Analysis (Abingdon, Routledge, 2015), 96Google Scholar
Green, James A., ‘The Great African War and the Intervention by Uganda and Rwanda in the Democratic Republic of Congo – 1998–2003’, in Ruys, Tom and Corten, Olivier (with Hofer, Alexandra) (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018), 575Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, ‘Self-Defence’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law, vol. IX (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012), 103Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter, ‘Self-Defence as a General Principle of Law and Its Relation to War’, in Eyffinger, Arthur, Stephens, Alan, and Muller, Sam (eds.), Self-Defence as a Fundamental Principle (The Hague, Hague Academic Press, 2009), 3Google Scholar
Heathcote, Gina, ‘Feminist Perspectives on the Law on the Use of Force’, in Weller, Marc (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015), 114Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis, ‘The Use of Force: Law and US Policy’, in Right v Might (New York, Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1991), 45Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘The Attitudes of Western States towards Legal Aspects of the Use of Force’, in Cassese, Antonio (ed.), The Current Legal Regulation of the Use of Force (Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 1986), 435Google Scholar
Kenny, Kevin C., ‘Self-Defence’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger and Philipp, Christiane E. (eds.), United Nations: Law, Policies and Practice, vol. II (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff, 1995), 1162Google Scholar
Koutrakos, Panos, ‘The Role of Law in Common Security and Defence Policy: Functions, Limitations and Perceptions’, in Koutrakos, Panos (ed.), European Foreign Policy: Legal and Political Perspectives (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2011), 235Google Scholar
Kritsiotis, Dino, ‘A Study of the Scope and Operation of the Rights of Individual and Collective Self-Defence under International Law’, in White, Nigel D. and Henderson, Christian (eds.), Research Handbook on International Conflict and Security Law: Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello and Jus Post Bellum (Abingdon, Routledge, 2013), 170Google Scholar
Kritsiotis, Dino, ‘Intervention and the Problematisation of Consent’, in Corten, Olivier, Fox, Gregory H., and Kritsiotis, Dino, Armed Intervention and Consent, Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War (Peters, Anne and Marxsen, Christian, series eds.), vol. IV (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2023), 26Google Scholar
Lalaj, Ana, ‘1968: The Prague Spring and the Albanian “Castle”’, in McDermott, Kevin and Stibbe, Matthew (eds.), Eastern Europe in 1968 (Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018), 235Google Scholar
Lieblich, Eliav, ‘The Soviet Intervention in Hungary – 1956’, in Ruys, Tom and Corten, Olivier (with Hofer, Alexandra) (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018), 48Google Scholar
Lieblich, Eliav, ‘Self-Defense against Non-State Actors and the Myth of the Innocent State’, in Bhuta, Nehal and Vallejo, Rodrigo (eds.), Global Governance and Human Rights (Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law) (Oxford, Oxford University Press, in press), SSRN version (13 May 2019), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3364163Google Scholar
Lubell, Noam, ‘The Problem of Imminence in an Uncertain World’, in Weller, Marc (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015), 697Google Scholar
Merkouris, Panos, ‘Introduction: Interpretation Is a Science, Is an Art, Is a Science’, in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Elias, Olufemi, and Merkouris, Panos (eds.), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On (Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 2010), 1Google Scholar
Müllerson, Rein, ‘Self-Defence in the Contemporary World’, in Damrosch, Lori Fisler and Scheffer, David J. (eds.), Law and Force in the New International Order (Boulder, Westview Press, 1991), 13Google Scholar
Nolte, Georg, and Randelzhofer, Albrecht, ‘Article 51’, in Simma, Bruno, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Nolte, Georg, Paulus, Andreas, and Wessendorf, Nikolai (eds.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, vol. II (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 3rd ed., 2012), 1397Google Scholar
O’Connell, Mary Ellen, ‘Unlawful Killing with Combat Drones: A Case Study of Pakistan, 2004–2009’, in Bronitt, Simon, Gani, Miriam, and Hufnagel, Saskia (eds.), Shooting to Kill: Socio-Legal Perspectives on the Use of Lethal Force (Oxford, Hart, 2012), 263Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, ‘Armed Intervention and Consent: Principle and Practice’, in Corten, Olivier, Fox, Gregory H., and Kritsiotis, Dino, Armed Intervention and Consent, Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War (Peters, Anne and Marxsen, Christian, series eds.), vol. IV (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2023), 1Google Scholar
Rupiya, Martin R., ‘A Political and Military Review of Zimbabwe’s Involvement in the Second Congo War’, in Clark, John F. (ed.), The African Stakes of the Congo War (New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), 93Google Scholar
Sakaguchi, Shojiro, ‘Major Constitutional Developments in Japan in the First Decade of the Twenty-First Century’, in Chen, Albert H. Y. (ed.), Constitutionalism in Asia in the Early Twenty-First Century (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2014), 52Google Scholar
Salmon, Jean, ‘Representatives of States in International Relations’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law, vol. VIII (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012), 919Google Scholar
Tams, Christian J., ‘Self-Defence against Non-State Actors: Making Sense of the “Armed Attack” Requirement’, in Ellen O’Connell, Mary, Tams, Christian J., and Tladi, Dire, Self-Defence against Non-State Actors, Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War (Peters, Anne and Marxsen, Christian, series eds.), vol. I (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2019), 90Google Scholar
Tesón, Fernando R., ‘Fake Custom’, in Lepard, Brian D. (ed.), Reexamining Customary International Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2017), 86Google Scholar
Verdebout, Agatha, ‘The Intervention of the Gulf Cooperation Council in Bahrain – 2011’, in Ruys, Tom and Corten, Olivier (with Hofer, Alexandra) (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018), 793Google Scholar
Waters, Christopher P. M., and James A., Green, ‘International Law: Military Force and Armed Conflict’, in Kassimeris, George and Buckley, John (eds), The Ashgate Research Companion to Modern Warfare (Farnham, Ashgate, 2010), 289Google Scholar
White, Nigel D., ‘The Korean War – 1950–53’, in Ruys, Tom and Corten, Olivier (with Hofer, Alexandra) (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2018), 17Google Scholar
Wood, Michael, ‘Self-Defence and Collective Security’, in Weller, Marc (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2015), 649Google Scholar
Acevedo, Domingo E., ‘Collective Self-Defense and the Use of Regional or Subregional Authority as Justification for the Use of Force’ (1984) 78 American Society of International Law Proceedings 69Google Scholar
Akande, Dapo, and Liefländer, Thomas, ‘Clarifying Necessity, Imminence, and Proportionality in the Law of Self-Defense’ (2013) 107 American Journal of International Law 563Google Scholar
Åkermark, Sia Spiliopoulou, ‘The Puzzle of Collective Self-Defence: Dangerous Fragmentation or a Window of Opportunity? An Analysis with Finland and the Åland Islands as a Case Study’ (2017) 22 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 249Google Scholar
Alvarez, Alejandro, ‘The Monroe Doctrine from the Latin-American Point of View’ (1917) 2 St. Louis Law Review 135Google Scholar
Antonopoulos, Constantine, ‘The Unilateral Use of Force by States after the End of the Cold War’ (1999) 4 Journal of Armed Conflict Law 117Google Scholar
Antonopoulos, Constantine, ‘Some Thoughts on the NATO Position in Relation to the Iraqi Crisis’ (2004) 17 Leiden Journal of International Law 171Google Scholar
Antonopoulos, Constantine, ‘Force by Armed Groups as Armed Attack and the Broadening of Self-Defence’ (2008) 55 Netherlands International Law Review 159Google Scholar
Azubuike, Eustace Chikere, ‘Probing the Scope of Self Defense in International Law’ (2011) 17 Annual Survey of International and Comparative Law 129Google Scholar
Bakhashab, Omar Abubakar, ‘The Relationship between the Right of Self-Defence on the Part of States and the Powers of the Security Council’ (1996) 9 Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Economics and Administration 3Google Scholar
Bakircioglu, Onder, ‘The Right to Self-Defence in National and International Law: The Role of the Imminence Requirement’ (2009) 19 Indiana International and Comparative Law Review 1Google Scholar
Bannelier, Karine, and Christakis, Theodore, ‘Under the UN Security Council’s Watchful Eyes: Military Intervention by Invitation in the Malian Conflict’ (2013) 26 Leiden Journal of International Law 855Google Scholar
Bannelier-Christakis, Karine, ‘Military Interventions against ISIL in Iraq, Syria and Libya, and the Legal Basis of Consent’ (2016) 29 Leiden Journal of International Law 74Google Scholar
Bassett Moore, John, ‘The New Isolation’ (1933) 27 American Journal of International Law 607Google Scholar
Baxter, Richard R., ‘The Legal Consequences of the Unlawful Use of Force under the Charter’ (1968) 62 American Society of International Law Proceedings 68Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex, ‘International Law and the War with Iraq’ (2003) 4 Melbourne Journal of International Law 497Google Scholar
Blank, Laurie R., ‘Irreconcilable Differences: The Thresholds for Armed Attack and International Armed Conflict’ (2020–2021) 96 Notre Dame Law Review 249Google Scholar
Bowett, Derek W., ‘Collective Self-Defence under the Charter of the United Nations’ (1955–1956) 32 British Yearbook of International Law 130Google Scholar
Boyle, Joe, ‘Making Sense of Self-Defence in the War on Terror’ (2014) 1 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 55Google Scholar
Brookman-Byrne, Max, ‘Intervention by (Secret) Invitation: Searching for a Requirement of Publicity in the International Law on the Use of Force with Consent’ (2020) 7 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 74Google Scholar
Brzezinski, Zbigniew, ‘An Agenda for NATO – Toward a Global Security Web’ (2009) 88 Foreign Affairs 2Google Scholar
Buchan, Russell, ‘Non-Forcible Measures and the Law of Self-Defence’ (2023) 72 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1Google Scholar
Butchard, Patrick M., ‘Back to San Francisco: Explaining the Inherent Contradictions of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter’ (2018) 23 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 229, 262–264.Google Scholar
Butchard, Patrick M., ‘Territorial Integrity, Political Independence, and Consent: The Limitations of Military Assistance on Request under the Prohibition of Force’ (2020) 7 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 35Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, ‘Terrorism, the Use of Force and International Law after 11 September’ (2002) 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 401Google Scholar
Byers, Michael, ‘Still Agreeing to Disagree: International Security and Constructive Ambiguity’ (2021) 8 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 91Google Scholar
Byrne, Max, ‘Consent and the Use of Force: An Examination of “Intervention by Invitation” as a Basis for US Drone Strikes in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen’ (2016) 3 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 97Google Scholar
Cannizzaro, Enzo, and Rasi, Aurora, ‘Europe at War’ (2022), (2021) 6 European Papers 1523Google Scholar
Caserta, Salvatore, ‘Western Centrism, Contemporary International Law, and International Courts’ (2021) 34 Leiden Journal of International Law 32Google Scholar
Cavandoli, Sofia, and Wilson, Gary, ‘Distorting Fundamental Norms of International Law to Resurrect the Soviet Union: The International Law Context of Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine’ (2022) 69 Netherlands International Law Review 383Google Scholar
Chen, Jie, et al., ‘The Primacy of the Individual Versus the Collective Self: Evidence from an Event-Related Potential Study’ (2013) 535 Neuroscience Letters 30Google Scholar
Chigara, Ben, ‘Operation of the SADC Protocol on Politics, Defence and Security in the Democratic Republic of Congo’ (2000) 12 African Journal of International and Comparative Law 58Google Scholar
Couzigou, Irène, ‘Respect for State Sovereignty: Primacy of Intervention by Invitation over the Right to Self-Defence’ (2019) 79 Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 695Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, Jean, ‘Legitimacy of Governments in the Age of Democracy’ (2006) 38 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 877Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, Jean, ‘Mapping the Concepts behind the Contemporary Liberalization of the Use of Force in International Law’ (2010) 31 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 1089Google Scholar
de Wet, Erika, ‘The (Im)permissibility of Military Assistance on Request during a Civil War’ (2020) 7 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 26Google Scholar
de Wet, Erika, ‘Military Assistance Based on Ex-Ante Consent: A Violation of Article 2(4) UN Charter?’ (2020) 93 Die Friedens-Warte 413Google Scholar
Deeks, Ashley S., ‘Consent to the Use of Force and International Law Supremacy’ (2013) 54 Harvard International Law Journal 1Google Scholar
Delanis, James A., ‘“Force” under Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter: The Question of Economic and Political Coercion’ (1979) 12 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 101Google Scholar
Deutsch, Eberhard P., ‘The Legality of the United States Position in Vietnam’ (1966) 52 American Bar Association Journal 436Google Scholar
Diab, Nader Iskandar, ‘Enforcement Action by Regional Organisations Revisited: The Prospective Joint Arab Forces’ (2017) 4 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 86Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, ‘The Jurisprudence of the Court in the Nicaragua Decision: Remarks’ (1987) 81 American Society of International Law Proceedings 266Google Scholar
Doswald-Beck, Louise, ‘The Legal Validity of Military Intervention by Invitation of the Government’ (1985) 56 British Yearbook of International Law 189Google Scholar
Dris-Aït-Hamadouche, Louisa, and Zoubir, Yahia H., ‘The US–Saudi Relationship and the Iraq War: The Dialectics of a Dependent Alliance’ (2007) 24 Journal of Third World Studies 109Google Scholar
Egan, Patrick T., ‘The Kosovo Intervention and Collective Self-Defence’ (2001) 8 International Peacekeeping 39Google Scholar
Emanuel, Lia, et al., ‘Who am I? Representing the Self Offline and in Different Online Contexts’ (2014) 41 Computers in Human Behavior 146Google Scholar
Etezazian, Sina, ‘The Nature of the Self-Defence Proportionality Requirement’ (2016) 3 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 260Google Scholar
Ezechi, K. C., Onyishi, A. U., Okonkwo, W. O., and Ogbuka, Ikenna, ‘Maintenance of International Peace and Security and Great Power Hypocrisy: Insights from the Iraqi and Ukrainian Invasions’ (2022) 4 Sapientia Foundation Journal of Education, Sciences and Gender Studies 237Google Scholar
Falk, Richard A., ‘International Law and the United States Role in the Viet Nam War’ (1966) 75 Yale Law Journal 1122Google Scholar
Falk, Richard A., ‘The Cambodian Operation and International Law’ (1971) 65 American Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar
Farer, Tom J., ‘Political and Economic Coercion in Contemporary International Law’ (1985) 79 American Journal of International Law 40Google Scholar
Farer, Tom J., ‘Drawing the Right Line’ (1987) 81 American Journal of International Law 112Google Scholar
Fawcett, J. E. S., The Legal Character of International Agreements’ (1953) 30 British Yearbook of International Law 381Google Scholar
Fawcett, J.E.S., ‘Intervention in International Law: A Study of Some Recent Cases’ (1961) 103 Recueil des cours 343Google Scholar
Fenwick, Charles G., ‘The Monroe Doctrine and the Declaration of Lima’ (1939) 33 American Journal of International Law 257Google Scholar
Ferro, Luca, ‘The Doctrine of “Negative Equality” and the Silent Majority of States’ (2021) 8 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 4Google Scholar
Fisher, Ryan M., ‘Defending Taiwan: Collective Self-Defense of a Contested State’ (2020) 32 Florida Journal of International Law 101Google Scholar
Flasch, Olivia, ‘The Legality of the Air Strikes against ISIL in Syria: New Insights on the Extraterritorial Use of Force against Non-State Actors’ (2016) 3 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 37Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., ‘Who Killed Article 2(4)? or Changing the Norms Governing the Use of Force by States’ (1970) 64 American Journal of International Law 809Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., ‘Terrorism and the Right of Self-Defence’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law 839Google Scholar
Gaertner, Lowell, et al., ‘A Motivational Hierarchy Within: Primacy of the Individual Self, Relational Self, or Collective Self?’ (2012) 48 Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 997Google Scholar
Garwood-Gowers, Anthony, ‘Israel’s Airstrike on Syria’s Al-Kibar Facility: A Test Case for the Doctrine of Preemptive Self-Defence?’ (2011) 16 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 263Google Scholar
Gehrke, William, ‘The Mozambique Crisis: A Case for United Nations Military Intervention’ (1991) 24 Cornell International Law Journal 135Google Scholar
Gerges, F. A., ‘The Lebanese Crisis of 1958: The Risks of Inflated Self-Importance’ (1993) 5 Beirut Review 83Google Scholar
German, Robert K., ‘Norway and the Bear: Soviet Coercive Diplomacy and Norwegian Security Policy’ (1982) 7 International Security 55Google Scholar
Gibson, John S., ‘Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations’ (1957) 13 India Quarterly 121Google Scholar
Gill, Terry D., ‘The Law of Armed Attack in the Context of the Nicaragua Case’ (1988) 1 Hague Yearbook of International Law 30Google Scholar
Gill, Terry D., ‘The Second Gulf Crisis and the Relation between Collective Security and Collective Self-Defense’ (1989) 10 Grotiana 47Google Scholar
Gill, Terry D., ‘The Jus ad Bellum and Russia’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine’ (2022) 25 Journal of International Peacekeeping 121Google Scholar
Gill, Terry D., and Tibori-Szabó, Kinga, ‘Twelve Key Questions on Self-Defense against Non-State Actors’ (2019) 95 International Law Studies 467Google Scholar
Glennon, Michael J., ‘United States Mutual Security Treaties: The Commitment Myth’ (1986) 24 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 509Google Scholar
Goldberg, Michael A., ‘Mirage of Defense: Reexamining Article Five of the North Atlantic Treaty after the Terrorist Attacks on the United States’ (2003) 26 Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 77Google Scholar
Grady, Broderick C., ‘Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty: Past, Present, and Uncertain Future’ (2002) 31 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 167Google Scholar
Gray, Christine, ‘The US National Security Strategy and the New “Bush Doctrine” on Pre-Emptive Self-Defence’ (2002) 1 Chinese Journal of International Law 437Google Scholar
Green, James A., ‘Docking the Caroline: Understanding the Relevance of the Formula in Contemporary Customary International Law Concerning Self-Defence’ (2006) 14 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 429Google Scholar
Green, James A., ‘Fluctuating Evidentiary Standards for Self-Defence in the International Court of Justice’ (2009) 58 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 163Google Scholar
Green, James A., ‘The Annexation of Crimea: Russia, Passportisation and the Protection of National Revisited’ (2014) 1 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 3Google Scholar
Green, James A., ‘The Article 51 Reporting Requirement for Self-Defense Actions’ (2015) 55 Virginia Journal of International Law 463Google Scholar
Green, James A., ‘The Ratione Temporis Elements of Self-Defence’ (2015) 2 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 97Google Scholar
Green, James A., ‘The “Additional” Criteria for Collective Self-Defence: Request but Not Declaration’ (2017) 4 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 4Google Scholar
Green, James A., ‘The Provision of Weapons and Logistical Support to Ukraine and the Jus ad Bellum’ (2023) 10 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 3Google Scholar
Green, James A., and Grimal, Francis, ‘The Threat of Force as an Action in Self-Defense under International Law’ (2011) 44 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 285Google Scholar
Green, James A., Henderson, Christian, and Ruys, Tom, ‘Russia’s Attack on Ukraine and the Jus ad Bellum’ (2022) 9 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 4Google Scholar
Greenwood, Christopher, ‘International Law and the Pre-Emptive Use of Force: Afghanistan, Al-Qaida, and Iraq’ (2003) 4 San Diego International Law Journal 7Google Scholar
Greig, D. W., ‘Self-Defence and the Security Council: What Does Article 51 Require?’ (1991) 40 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 366Google Scholar
Hafner, Gerhard, l’Institut de droit international, 10th Commission, ‘Present Problems of the Use of Force in International Law Sub-group: Intervention by Invitation’ (2009) 73 Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international 299Google Scholar
Halberstam, Malvina, ‘The Right to Self-Defense Once the Security Council Takes Action’ (1996) 17 Michigan Journal of International Law 229Google Scholar
Hamid, Abdul Ghafur, and Sein, Khin Maung, ‘Combating Terrorism and the Use of Force against a State: A Relook at the Contemporary World Order’ (2015) 8 Journal of East Asia and International Law 107Google Scholar
Hamilton, Tomas, ‘Defending Ukraine with EU Weapons: Arms Control Law in Times of Crisis’ (2022) 1 European Law Open 635Google Scholar
Haque, Adil Ahmad, ‘The Use of Force against Non-State Actors: All over the Map’ (2021) 8 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 278Google Scholar
Hargrove, John Lawrence, ‘The Nicaragua Judgment and the Future of the Law of Force and Self-Defence’ (1987) 81 American Journal of International Law 135Google Scholar
Heindel, Richard H., Kalijarvi, Thorsten V., and Wilcox, Francis O., ‘The North Atlantic Treaty in the United States Senate’ (1949) 43 American Journal of International Law 633Google Scholar
Heller, Kevin Jon, ‘The Unlawfulness of a “Bloody Nose Strike” on North Korea’ (2020) 96 International Law Studies 1, 15Google Scholar
Heller, Kevin Jon, and Trabucco, Lena, ‘The Legality of Weapons Transfers to Ukraine under International Law’ (2022) 13 Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies 251Google Scholar
Henderson, Christian, ‘The 2006 National Security Strategy of the United States: The Pre-Emptive Use of Force and the Persistent Advocate’ (2007–2008) 15 Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law 1Google Scholar
Henderson, Christian, ‘Contested States and the Rights and Obligations of the Jus ad Bellum’ (2013) 21 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 367Google Scholar
Henderson, Christian, ‘A Countering of the Asymmetrical Interpretation of the Doctrine of Counter-Intervention’ (2021) 8 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 34Google Scholar
Henderson, Christian, ‘Book Review: Erika de Wet, Military Assistance on Request and the Use of Force’ (2022) 33 European Journal of International Law 1037Google Scholar
Henderson, Christian, and Green, James A., ‘The Jus ad Bellum and Entities Short of Statehood in the Report on the Conflict in Georgia’ (2010) 59 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 129Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘The Legal Limits to the Use of Force by Sovereign States: United Nations Practice’ (1961) 37 British Yearbook of International Law 269Google Scholar
Himes, Annie, and Kim, Brian J., ‘Self-Defense on Behalf of Non-State Actors’ (2021) 43 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 241Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tamás, ‘The International Legal Aspects of the Georgia–Russia Conflict’ (December 2008) Foreign Policy Review 80Google Scholar
Hofmann, Rainer, ‘International Law and the Use of Military Force against Iraq’ (2002) 45 German Yearbook of International Law 9Google Scholar
Holder, William E., ‘The Legality of United States Participation in Vietnam: An Appraisal’ (1966) 2 Australian Yearbook of International Law 67Google Scholar
Hughes, Charles E., ‘Observations on the Monroe Doctrine’ (1923) 17 American Journal of International Law 611Google Scholar
Hursh, John, ‘International Humanitarian Law Violations, Legal Responsibility, and US Military Support to the Saudi Coalition in Yemen: A Cautionary Tale’ (2020) 7 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 122Google Scholar
Ikejiaku, Brian-Vincent, ‘International Law Is Western Made Global Law: The Perception of Third-World Category’ (2013) 6 African Journal of Legal Studies 337Google Scholar
Jacewicz, Andrzej, ‘The Concept of Force in the United Nations Charter’ (1977–1978) 9 Polish Yearbook of International Law 137Google Scholar
Jain, Abhimanyu George, ‘Rationalising International Law Rules on Self-Defence: The Pin-Prick Doctrine’ (2014) 14 Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law 23Google Scholar
Joyner, Daniel, ‘Why I Stopped Believing in Customary International Law’ (2019) 9 Asian Journal of International Law 31Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W., ‘From Nuremburg to The Hague: The United States Position in Nicaragua v. United States and the Development of International Law’ (1987) 12 Yale Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jörg, ‘Uncertainty in the Formal Sources of International Law: Customary International Law and Some of Its Problems’ (2004) 15 European Journal of International Law 523Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, ‘Collective Security and Collective Self-Defense under the Charter of the United Nations’ (1948) 42 American Journal of International Law 783Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, ‘The Future of Collective Security’ (1951) 21 Revista Juridica de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 83Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, ‘Is the North Atlantic Treaty a Regional Arrangement?’ (1951) 45 American Journal of International Law 162Google Scholar
Khater, Maya, ‘The Legality of the Russian Military Operations against Ukraine from the Perspective of International Law’ (2022) 3 Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 1Google Scholar
Kleczkowska, Agata, ‘The Misconception about the Term “Intervention by Invitation”’ (2019) 79 Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 1Google Scholar
Kleczkowska, Agata, ‘The Meaning of Treaty Authorisation and Ad Hoc Consent for the Legality of Military Assistance on Request’ (2020) 7 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 270Google Scholar
Kopel, David B., Gallant, Paul, and Eisen, Joanne D., ‘The Human Right of Self-Defense’ (2007) 22 Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law 43Google Scholar
Kreß, Claus, ‘The Ukraine War and the Prohibition of the Use of Force in International Law’ (2022) Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, Occasional Paper Series No. 13, 1Google Scholar
Kritsiotis, Dino, ‘Arguments of Mass Confusion’ (2004) 15 European Journal of International Law 233Google Scholar
Kufuor, Kofi Oteng, ‘The OAU and the Recognition of Governments in Africa: Analyzing its Practice and Proposals for the Future’ (2002) 17 American University International Law Review 369Google Scholar
Kulski, W. W., ‘The Soviet System of Collective Security Compared with the Western System’ (1950) 44 American Journal of International Law 453Google Scholar
Kunz, Joseph L., ‘Individual and Collective Self-Defence under Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations’ (1947) 41 American Journal of International Law 872Google Scholar
Kwiecień, Roman, ‘The Nicaragua Judgment and the Use of Force – 30 Years Later’ (2016) 36 Polish Yearbook of International Law 21Google Scholar
Land, Kristi, ‘Legal Aspects of the Conflict in Georgia and Post-Conflict Developments’ (2008–2009) Estonian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Yearbook 49Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘Recognition of States in International Law’ (1944) 53 Yale Law Journal 385Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, ‘Recognition of Governments: I’ (1945) 45 Columbia Law Review 815Google Scholar
Le Mon, Christopher J., ‘Unilateral Intervention by Invitation in Civil Wars: The Effective Control Test Tested’ (2003) 35 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 741Google Scholar
Lee, Jaemin, ‘Collective Self-Defense or Collective Security: Japan’s Reinterpretation of Article 9 of the Constitution’ (2015) 8 Journal of East Asia and International Law 373Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, ‘Is Treaty Interpretation an Art or a Science? International Law and Rational Decision Making’ (2015) 26 European Journal of International Law 169Google Scholar
Lotrionte, Catherine, ‘The Just War Doctrine and Covert Responses to Terrorism’ (2002) 3 Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 85Google Scholar
Lott, Alexander, ‘The Tagliavini Report Revisited: Jus ad Bellum and the Legality of the Russian Intervention in Georgia’ (2012) 28 Merkourios – International and European Security Law 4Google Scholar
MacDonald, R. St. J., ‘The Nicaragua Case: New Answers to Old Questions’ (1986) 24 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 127Google Scholar
Mahmoudi, Said, ‘Self-Defence and “Unwilling or Unable” States’ (2021) 422 Recueil des cours 249Google Scholar
Martin, Craig, ‘Challenging and Refining the “Unwilling or Unable” Doctrine’ (2019) 52 Vanderbilt Law Review 387Google Scholar
McWhinney, Edward, ‘President Bush and the New U.S. National Security Strategy: The Continuing Relevance of the Legal Advisor and International Law’ (2002) 1 Chinese Journal of International Law 421Google Scholar
Meeker, Leonard C., ‘The Legality of United States Participation in the Defense of Viet-Nam’ (1966) 54 Department of State Bulletin 474Google Scholar
Meiβner, Berhard, ‘Ancient Greek Coalition Warfare: Classical and Hellenistic Examples’ (2012) 14 Journal of Military and Strategic Studies 1Google Scholar
Mendelson, Maurice, ‘Practice, Propaganda and Principle in International Law’ (1989) 42 Current Legal Problems 1Google Scholar
Meyer, Jane A., ‘Collective Self-Defense and Regional Security: Necessary Exceptions to a Globalist Doctrine’ (1993) 11 Boston University International Law Journal 391Google Scholar
Michael, Helen, ‘Covert Involvement in Essentially Internal Conflicts: United States Assistance to the Contras under International Law’ (1990) 23 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 539Google Scholar
Miles, William F. S., ‘Tragic Tradeoffs: Democracy and Security in Chad’ (1995) 33 The Journal of Modern African Studies 53Google Scholar
Miller, Edward, ‘Self-Defence, International Law and the Six Day War’ (1985) 20 Israeli Law Review 49Google Scholar
Mills, Claire, ‘Military Assistance to Ukraine since the Russian Invasion’, House of Commons Library, Research Briefing (17 October 2022)Google Scholar
Minai, Keisuke, ‘What Legal Interest Is Protected by the Right of Collective Self-Defense: The Japanese Perspective’ (2016) 24 Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution 105Google Scholar
Modabber, Zia, ‘Collective Self-Defense: Nicaragua v. United States’ (1988) 10 Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal 449Google Scholar
Mori, Tadashi, ‘Collective Self-Defence in International Law and in the New Japanese Legislation for Peace and Security (2015)’ (2017) 60 Japanese Yearbook of International Law 158Google Scholar
Morrison, Fred L., ‘Legal Issues in the Nicaragua Opinion’ (1987) 81 American Journal of International Law 160Google Scholar
Mrázek, Josef, ‘Prohibition of the Use and Threat of Force: Self-Defence and Self-Help in International Law’ (1989) 27 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 81Google Scholar
Murphy, Sean D., ‘Self-Defence and the Israeli Wall Advisory Opinion: An Ipse Dixit from the ICJ?’ (2005) 99 American Journal of International Law 62Google Scholar
Murphy, Sean D., ‘The International Legality of US Military Cross-border Operations from Afghanistan into Pakistan’ (2009) 85 International Legal Studies 109Google Scholar
Mushkat, Roda, ‘Who May Wage War – An Examination of an Old/New Question’ (1987) 2 American University Journal of International Law and Policy 97Google Scholar
Nagan, Winston P., and Hammer, Craig, ‘The Changing Character of Sovereignty in International Law and International Relations’ (2004) 43 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 141Google Scholar
Norton Moore, John, ‘The Secret War in Central America and the Future of World Order’ (1986) 80 American Journal of International Law 43Google Scholar
Norton Moore, John, ‘The Nicaragua Case and the Deterioration of World Order’ (1987) 81 American Journal of International Law 151Google Scholar
Norton Moore, John, and Underwood, James L., ‘The Lawfulness of United States Assistance to the Republic of Viet Nam’ (1966) 5 Duquesne Law Review 235Google Scholar
Nußberger, Benjamin, ‘Military Strikes in Yemen in 2015: Intervention by Invitation and Self-Defence in the Course of Yemen’s “Model Transitional Process”’ (2017) 4 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 110Google Scholar
O’Connell, Mary Ellen, ‘Review: Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States by Judith Gardam’ (2006) 100 American Journal of International Law 973Google Scholar
O’Connell, Mary Ellen, ‘Rules of Evidence for the Use of Force in International Law’s New Era’ (2006) 100 American Society of International Law Proceedings 44Google Scholar
O’Connell, Mary Ellen, ‘Preserving the Peace: The Continuing Ban on War between States’ (2007) 38 California Western International Law Journal 41Google Scholar
O’Connell, Mary Ellen, ‘The True Meaning of Force: A Further Response to Tom Ruys in the Interest of Peace’ (2014) 108 AJIL Unbound 153Google Scholar
O’Connor, Laurie, ‘Legality of the Use of Force in Syria against Islamic State and the Khorasan Group’ (2016) 3 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 70Google Scholar
Ochoa-Ruiz, Natalia, and Salamanca-Aguado, Esther, ‘Exploring the Limits of International Law relating to the Use of Force in Self-Defence’ (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 499Google Scholar
Oliver, Covey, ‘International Law and the Quarantine of Cuba: A Hopeful Prescription for Legal Writing’ (1963) 57 American Journal of International Law 373Google Scholar
Orford, Anne, ‘Regional Orders, Geopolitics, and the Future of International Law’ (2021) 74 Current Legal Problems 149Google Scholar
Österdahl, Inger, ‘Sweden’s Collective Defence Obligations or This Is Not a Collective Defence Pact (or Is It?): Considerations of International and Constitutional Law’ (2021) 90 Nordic Journal of International Law 127Google Scholar
Paddeu, Federica, ‘Use of Force against Non-State Actors and the Circumstance Precluding Wrongfulness of Self-Defence’ (2017) 30 Leiden Journal of International Law 93Google Scholar
Paddeu, Federica I., ‘Military Assistance on Request and General Reasons against Force: Consent as a Defence to the Prohibition of Force’ (2020) 7 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 227Google Scholar
Padmanabhan, Aadhithi, and Shih, Michael, ‘Collective Self-Defense: A Report of the Yale Law School Center for Global Legal Challenges’ (10 December 2012), https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/cglc/GLC_Collective_SelfDefense.pdfGoogle Scholar
Perišić, Petra, ‘Intervention by Invitation – When Can Consent from a Host State Justify Foreign Military Intervention?’ (2019) 7 Russian Law Journal 4Google Scholar
Perkins, John A., ‘The Right of Counterintervention’ (1987) 17 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 171Google Scholar
Perot, Elie, ‘The Art of Commitments: NATO, the EU, and the Interplay between Law and Politics within Europe’s Collective Defence Architecture’ (2019) 28 European Security 40Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, ‘Intervention by Invitation: Impulses from the Max Planck Trialogues on the Law of Peace and War’ (2019) 79 Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 635Google Scholar
Pijpers, Peter B. M. J., Boddens Hosang, Hans J. F. R., and Ducheine, Paul A. L., ‘Collective Cyber Defence – The EU and NATO Perspective on Cyber Attacks’ (2021) Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2021-37, Amsterdam Center for International Law No. 2021-13Google Scholar
Powell, Russell, ‘The Law and Philosophy of Preventive War: An Institution-Based Approach to Collective Self-Defence’ (2007) 32 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 67Google Scholar
Reichler, Paul S., and Wippman, David, ‘United States Armed Intervention in Nicaragua: A Rejoinder’ (1986) 11 Yale Journal of International Law 462Google Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael, ‘International Incidents: Introduction to a New Genre in the Study of International Law’ (1984–1985) 10 Yale Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael, ‘Old Wine in New Bottles: The Reagan and Brezhnev Doctrines in Contemporary International Law and Practice’ (1988) 13 Yale Journal of International Law 171Google Scholar
Reisman, W. Michael, ‘Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law’ (1990) 84 American Journal of International Law 866Google Scholar
Parra, Paola Diana Reyes, ‘Self-Defence against Non-State Actors: Possibility or Reality?’ (2021) 9 Revista de la Facultad de Jurisprudencia 151Google Scholar
Rohlik, Josef, ‘Some Remarks on Self-Defense and Intervention: A Reaction to Reading Law and Civil War in the Modern World’ (1976) 6 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 395Google Scholar
Rondos, Alex, ‘Civil War and Foreign Intervention in Chad’ (1985) 84 Current History 209Google Scholar
Roscini, Marco, ‘On the “Inherent” Character of the Right of States to Self-Defence’ (2015) 4 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 634Google Scholar
Ross, Simona, ‘U.S. Justifications for the Use of Force in Syria through the Prism of the Responsibility to Protect’ (2021) 8 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 233Google Scholar
Rostow, Eugene V., ‘Until What? Enforcement Action or Collective Self-Defense’ (1991) 85 American Journal of International Law 506Google Scholar
Rostow, Nicholas, ‘Nicaragua and the Law of Self-Defense Revisited’ (1986) 11 Yale Journal of International Law 437Google Scholar
Roth, Brad R., ‘The Enduring Significance of State Sovereignty’ (2004) 56 Florida Law Review 1017Google Scholar
Roucounas, Emmanuel, l’Institut de droit international, 10th Commission, ‘Present Problems of the Use of Force in International Law Sub-group: Self-Defence’ (2007) 72 Annuaire de l’Institut de droit international 75Google Scholar
Rowles, James P., ‘Secret Wars, Self-Defense and the Charter – A Reply to Professor Moore’ (1986) 80 American Journal of International Law 568Google Scholar
Rumpf, Helmut, ‘The Concepts of Peace and War in International Law’ (1984) 27 German Yearbook of International Law 429Google Scholar
Ruys, Tom, ‘The “Protection of Nationals” Doctrine Revisited’ (2008) 13 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 233Google Scholar
Ruys, Tom, ‘The Meaning of Force and the Boundaries of the Jus ad Bellum: Are Minimal Uses of Force Excluded from UN Charter Article 2(4)’ (2014) 108 American Journal of International Law 159Google Scholar
Ruys, Tom, ‘The True Meaning of Force: A Reply to Mary Ellen O’Connell’ (2014) 108 AJIL Unbound 148Google Scholar
Ruys, Tom, and Ferro, Luca, ‘Weathering the Storm: Legality and Legal Implication of the Saudi-Led Military Intervention in Yemen’ (2016) 65 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 61Google Scholar
Sapiro, Miriam, ‘Iraq: The Shifting Sands of Pre-Emptive Self-Defense’ (2003) 97 American Journal of International Law 599Google Scholar
Sari, Aurel, ‘The Mutual Assistance Clauses of the North Atlantic and EU Treaties: The Challenge of Hybrid Threats’ (2019) 10 Harvard National Security Journal 405Google Scholar
Scarfi, Juan Pablo, ‘Denaturalizing the Monroe Doctrine: The Rise of Latin American Legal Anti-Imperialism in the Face of the Modern US and Hemispheric Redefinition of the Monroe Doctrine’ (2020) 33 Leiden Journal of International Law 541Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, ‘The Right of States to Use Armed Force’ (1983–1984) 82 Michigan Law Review 1620Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, ‘Self-Defense and the Rule of Law’ (1989) 83 American Journal of International Law 259Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, ‘United Nations in the Gulf Conflict’ (1991) 85 American Journal of International Law 452Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, ‘Implementing Limitations on the Use of Force: The Doctrine of Proportionality and Necessity: Remarks’ (1992) 86 American Society of International Law Proceedings 39Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., ‘Computer Network Attack and the Use of Force in International Law: Thoughts on a Normative Framework’ (1999) 37 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 885Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., ‘Drone Attacks under the Jus as Bellum and Jus in Bello: Clearing the “Fog of Law”’ (2010) 13 Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 311Google Scholar
Schuit, Anne, ‘Recognition of Governments in International Law and the Recent Conflict in Libya’ (2012) 14 International Community Law Review 381Google Scholar
Scobbie, Iain, ‘Words My Mother Never Taught Me: In Defence of the International Court’ (2005) 99 American Journal of International Law 76Google Scholar
Shah, Niaz A., ‘Self-Defence, Anticipatory Self-Defence and Pre-Emption: International Law’s Response to Terrorism’ (2007) 12 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 95Google Scholar
Shteynberg, Garriy, et al., ‘Agency and Identity in the Collective Self’ (2022) 26 Personality and Social Psychology Review 35Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno, ‘NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar
Sofaer, Abraham D., ‘On the Necessity of Pre-Emption’ (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law 209Google Scholar
Sohn, Louis B., ‘Western European Treaty for Collaboration and Collective Self-Defence’ (1948) 34 American Bar Association Journal 406Google Scholar
Sohn, Louis B., ‘How New Is the New International Legal Order?’ (1992) 20 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 205Google Scholar
Spagnolo, Andrea, ‘The Armed Attack against Ukraine and the Italian Reaction from a Ius ad Bellum Perspective’ (2022) 2 The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law 443Google Scholar
Starski, Paulina, ‘Silence within the Process of Normative Change and Evolution of the Prohibition on the Use of Force: Normative Volatility and Legislative Responsibility’ (2017) 4 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 14Google Scholar
Svicevic, Marko, ‘Collective Self-Defence or Regional Enforcement Action: The Legality of a SADC Intervention in Cabo Delgado and the Question of Mozambican Consent’ (2022) 9 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 138Google Scholar
Szpak, Agnieszka, et al., ‘Reaction to the Russian Aggression against Ukraine: Cities as International Standards’ Supporters’ (2022) Journal of Contemporary European Studies, advance access version, www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14782804.2022.2126445Google Scholar
Taft IV, William H., ‘Self-Defence and the Oil Platforms Decision’ (2004) 29 Yale Journal of International Law 295Google Scholar
Talmon, Stefan, ‘Changing Views on the Use of Force: The German Position’ (2005) 5 Baltic Yearbook of International Law 41Google Scholar
Terry, Patrick C. R., ‘Afghanistan’s Civil War (1979–1989): Illegal and Failed Foreign Interventions’ (2011) 31 Polish Yearbook of International Law 107Google Scholar
Terry, Patrick, ‘Germany Joins the Campaign against ISIS in Syria: A Case of Collective Self-Defence or Rather the Unlawful Use of Force?’ (2016) 4 Russian Law Journal 26Google Scholar
Tertrais, Bruno, ‘Article 5 of the Washington Treaty: Its Origins, Meaning and Future’ (2016) NATO Defense College, Research Paper No. 130Google Scholar
ThomasJr., A. J., and Van Wynen Thomas, Ann, ‘The Organization of American States and Collective Security’ (1959) 13 Southwestern Law Journal 177Google Scholar
Trapp, Kimberley N., ‘Back to Basics: Necessity, Proportionality and the Right of Self-Defence against Non-State Terrorist Actors’ (2007) 56 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 141Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert W., ‘The Interpretation of War under Present International Law’ (1951) 4 International Law Quarterly 11Google Scholar
Tzouvala, Ntina, ‘TWAIL and the “Unwilling or Unable” Doctrine: Continuities and Ruptures’ (2015) 109 AJIL Unbound 266Google Scholar
Ulfstein, Geir, and Christiansen, Hege Føsund, ‘The Legality of the NATO Bombing in Libya’ (2013) 62 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 159Google Scholar
van den Herik, Larissa, ‘Replicating Article 51: A Reporting Requirement for Consent-Based Use of Force?’ (2019) 79 Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 707Google Scholar
van der Steenhoven, Nick, ‘Conduct and Subsequent Practice by States in the Application of the Requirement to Report under UN Charter Article 51 (2019) 6 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 242Google Scholar
van der Vyver, Johan D., ‘Military Intervention in Syria: The American, British and French Alternatives and the Russian Option’ (2015) 48 De Jure 36Google Scholar
Verdross, Alfred, ‘Austria’s Permanent Neutrality and the United Nations Organization’ (1956) 50 American Journal of International Law 61Google Scholar
Visser, Laura, ‘May the Force Be with You: The Legal Classification of Intervention by Invitation’ (2019) 66 Netherlands International Law Review 21Google Scholar
Visser, Laura, ‘What’s in a Name? The Terminology of Intervention by Invitation’ (2019) 79 Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 651Google Scholar
Visser, Laura, ‘Intervention by Invitation and Collective Self-Defence: Two Sides of the Same Coin?’ (2020) 7 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 292Google Scholar
Waldock, C. H. M., ‘The Regulation of the Use of Force by Individual States in International Law’ (1952) 81 Recueil des cours 451Google Scholar
Walker, George K., ‘Anticipatory Collective Self-Defense in the Charter Era: What the Treaties Have Said’ (1998) 31 Cornell International Law Journal 321Google Scholar
Warren, Patrick T., ‘Alliance History and the Future NATO: What the Last 500 Years of Alliance Behavior Tells Us about NATO’s Path Forward’, 21st Century Defense Initiative Policy Paper, Foreign Policy at Brookings (30 June 2010), www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/0630_nato_alliance_warren.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wedgwood, Ruth, ‘Proportionality and Necessity in American National Security Decision Making’ (1992) 86 American Society of International Law Proceedings 58Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ruth, ‘Responding to Terrorism: Strikes against bin Laden’ (1999) 24 Yale Journal of International Law 559Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ruth, ‘The ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Israeli Security Fence and the Limits of Self-Defence’ (2005) 99 American Journal of International Law 52Google Scholar
Weightman, M. A., ‘Self-Defense in International Law’ (1951) 37 Virginia Law Review 1095Google Scholar
Wigmore, John H., ‘The Work of the Fourth Assembly (1923) of the League of Nations: A Legislative Summary’ (1924) 9 The Virginia Law Register 887Google Scholar
Willard, Andrew R., ‘Incidents: An Essay in Method’ (1984–1985) 10 Yale Journal of International Law 21Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, Elizabeth (ed.), ‘The Chatham House Principles of International Law on the Use of Force by States in Self-Defence’ (2006) 55 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 963Google Scholar
Wingfield, Thomas C., ‘Forcible Protection of Nationals Abroad’ (1999–2000) 104 Dickinson Law Review 447Google Scholar
Wilson, Gary, ‘The Legal, Military and Political Consequences of the “Coalition of the Willing” Approach to UN Military Enforcement Action’ (2007) 12 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 295Google Scholar
Wilson, Larry C., ‘The Defence of Others – Criminal Law and the Good Samaritan’ (1988) 33 McGill Law Journal 756Google Scholar
Wippman, David, ‘Military Intervention, Regional Organizations, and Host-State Consent’ (1996) 7 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 209Google Scholar
Wood, Michael, ‘International Law and the Use of Force: What Happens in Practice?’ (2013) 53 Indian Journal of International Law 345Google Scholar
Wrange, Pål, ‘Law, Force and Contingency – Notes on a Bold Monograph on Article 2(4) and the Problems of Finding a Proper Basis for International Legal Reasoning’ (1992–1993) 61 Nordic Journal of International Law 83Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy, ‘United States Intervention in the Lebanon’ (1959) 53 American Journal of International Law 112Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy, ‘Legal Aspects of the Viet-Nam Situation’ (1966) 60 American Journal of International Law 750Google Scholar
Wyse, Christian, ‘The African Union’s Right of Humanitarian Intervention as Collective Self-Defense’ (2018) 19 Chicago Journal of International Law 295Google Scholar
Yoo, John, ‘International Law and the War in Iraq’ (2003) 97 American Journal of International Law 563Google Scholar
Yost, David S., ‘NATO and the Anticipatory Use of Force’ (2007) 83 International Affairs 39Google Scholar
Zamani, Masoud, and Nikouei, Majid, ‘Intervention by Invitation, Collective Self-Defence and the Enigma of Effective Control’ (2017) 16 Chinese Journal of International Law 663Google Scholar
Benton, Tim, Froggatt, Antony, and Wellesley, Laura, ‘Ukraine Crisis Could Trigger Cascading Risks Globally’, Chatham House (16 March 2022), www.chathamhouse.org/2022/03/ukraine-crisis-could-trigger-cascading-risks-globallyGoogle Scholar
Christakis, Theodore, and Bannelier, Karine, ‘French Military Intervention in Mali: It’s Legal but … Why? Part I’, EJIL:Talk! (24 January 2013), www.ejiltalk.org/french-military-intervention-in-mali-its-legal-but-why-part-iGoogle Scholar
Constantinou, Costas M., ‘Revising the Treaty of Guarantee for a Cyprus Settlement’, EJIL:Talk! (21 June 2017), www.ejiltalk.org/revising-the-treaty-of-guarantee-for-a-cyprus-settlement/#:~:text=The%20existing%20Treaty%20of%20Guarantee,led%20military%20coup%20in%201974Google Scholar
Doubek, Pavel, ‘War in Ukraine: Time for a Collective Self-Defense?’ Opinio Juris (29 March 2022), http://opiniojuris.org/2022/03/29/war-in-ukraine-time-for-a-collective-self-defenseGoogle Scholar
Gorenburg, Dmitry, ‘Russia and Collective Security: Why CSTO Is No Match for Warsaw Pact’, Russia Matters (27 May 2020), www.russiamatters.org/analysis/russia-and-collective-security-why-csto-no-match-warsaw-pactGoogle Scholar
Haque, Adil Ahmad, ‘On the Precipice: The U.S. and Russia in Syria’, Just Security (19 June 2017), www.justsecurity.org/42297/precipice-u-s-russia-syriaGoogle Scholar
Hasar, Seyfullah, ‘Kazakhstan: Another Intervention by Invitation that Played Out as Expected’, Opinio Juris (7 February 2022), http://opiniojuris.org/2022/02/07/kazakhstan-another-intervention-by-invitation-that-played-out-as-expectedGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona, and Hartig, Luke, ‘Still at War: The United States in Somalia’, Just Security (31 March 2022), www.justsecurity.org/80921/still-at-war-the-united-states-in-somaliaGoogle Scholar
Heller, Kevin Jon, ‘The Coming Attack on Syria Will Be Unlawful’, Opinio Juris (12 April 2018), http://opiniojuris.org/2018/04/12/the-coming-attack-on-syria-will-be-unlawfulGoogle Scholar
Kreß, Claus, ‘The Fine Line between Collective Self-Defense and Intervention by Invitation: Reflections on the Use of Force against “IS” in Syria’, Just Security (17 February 2015), www.justsecurity.org/20118/claus-kreb-force-isil-syriaGoogle Scholar
Lukyanov, Fyodor A., ‘Kazakhstan Intervention Sees Russia Set a New Precedent’, Russia in Global Affairs (7 January 2022), https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/kazakhstan-new-precedentGoogle Scholar
Martin, Craig, ‘Japan’s Definition of Armed Attack and “Bloody Nose” Strikes against North Korea’, Just Security (1 February 2018), www.justsecurity.org/51678/japans-definition-armed-attack-bloody-nose-strikes-north-koreaGoogle Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, ‘The Clearly Illegal US Missile Strike in Syria’, EJIL:Talk! (7 April 2017), www.ejiltalk.org/the-clearly-illegal-us-missile-strike-in-syriaGoogle Scholar
Nevitt, Mark, ‘The Operational and Legal Risks of a No-Fly Zone over Ukrainian Skies’, Just Security (10 March 2022), www.justsecurity.org/80641/the-operational-and-legal-risks-of-a-no-fly-zone-over-ukrainian-skiesGoogle Scholar
Paddeu, Federica, ‘The Rio Treaty: Paving the Way for Military Intervention in Venezuela?’, Just Security (29 October 2019), www.justsecurity.org/66758/the-rio-treaty-paving-the-way-for-military-intervention-in-venezuelaGoogle Scholar
Pothelet, Elvina, ‘U.S. Military’s “Collective Self-Defense” of Non-State Partner Forces: What Does International Law Say?’, Just Security (26 October 2018), www.justsecurity.org/61232/collective-self-defense-partner-forces-international-law-sayGoogle Scholar
Sari, Aurel, and Nasu, Hitoshi, ‘Collective Self-Defense and the “Bloody Nose Strategy”: Does It Take Two to Tango?’, Just Security (26 January 2018), www.justsecurity.org/51435/collective-self-defense-bloody-nose-strategy-tangoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., ‘Providing Arms and Materiel to Ukraine: Neutrality, Co-Belligerency, and the Use of Force’, Articles of War (7 March 2022), https://lieber.westpoint.edu/ukraine-neutrality-co-belligerency-use-of-forceGoogle Scholar
Schönleben, Ella, ‘Collective Self-Defence or Just Another Intervention?: Some Thoughts on Turkey Allegedly Sending Syrian Mercenaries to Nagorno-Karabakh’, Völkerrechtsblog (2 November 2020), https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/de/collective-self-defence-or-just-another-interventionGoogle Scholar
Tibori-Szabó, Kinga, ‘The Downing of the Syrian Fighter Jet and Collective Self-Defence’, Opinio Juris (23 June 2017), http://opiniojuris.org/2017/06/23/the-downing-of-the-syrian-fighter-jet-and-collective-self-defenceGoogle Scholar
van Wilgenburg, Wladimir, ‘Syrian Democratic Forces (Syria)’, in Guns and Governance: How Europe Should Talk with Non-State Armed Groups in The Middle East the Middle East and North Africa’, European Council on Foreign Relations, https://ecfr.eu/special/mena-armed-groups/syrian-democratic-forces-syriaGoogle Scholar
Vermeer, Zachary, ‘The Jus ad Bellum and the Airstrikes in Yemen: Double Standards for Decamping Presidents?’, EJIL:Talk! (30 April 2015), www.ejiltalk.org/the-jus-ad-bellum-and-the-airstrikes-in-yemen-double-standards-for-decamping-presidentsGoogle Scholar
Weller, Marc, ‘Options for a Peace Settlement for Ukraine: Option Paper I – Neutrality and Related Concepts’, Opinio Juris (31 March 2022), https://opiniojuris.org/2022/03/31/options-for-a-peace-settlement-for-ukraine-option-paper-i-neutrality-and-related-conceptsGoogle Scholar
Wentker, Alexander, ‘At War: When Do States Supporting Ukraine or Russia Become Parties to the Conflict and What Would that Mean?’, EJIL:Talk! (14 March 2022), www.ejiltalk.org/at-war-when-do-states-supporting-ukraine-or-russia-become-parties-to-the-conflict-and-what-would-that-meanGoogle Scholar
Wilmshurst, Elizabeth, ‘Ukraine: Debunking Russia’s Legal Justifications’, Chatham House (24 February 2022), www.chathamhouse.org/2022/02/ukraine-debunking-russias-legal-justificationsGoogle Scholar