Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:42:41.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2024

Shu-Ling Wu ,
Lihong Huang  and
Carl Polley
Shu-Ling Wu
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
Lihong Huang
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Carl Polley
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition of Chinese
Theories and Applications
 , pp. 210 - 230
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achard, M. (2018). Teaching usage and concepts: Toward a cognitive pedagogical grammar. In Tyler, A. et al. (Eds.), What is applied cognitive linguistics?: Answers from current SLA research (pp. 37–61). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
ACTFL. (2012). ACTFL proficiency guidelines. Retrieved January 27, 2023 from www.actfl.org/resources/actfl-proficiency-guidelines-2012.Google Scholar
Ahrens, K. (2010). Mapping principles for conceptual metaphors. In Low, G. et al. (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp. 185–208). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ahrens, K., & Chung, S. (2019). Metaphor in Chinese. In Huang, C. et al. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Chinese applied linguistics (pp. 364–378). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akama, H., & Murphy, B. (2017). Emerging methods for conceptual modelling in neuroimaging. Behaviormetrika, 44(1), 117–133.Google Scholar
Anderson, R., & Nagy, W. (1991). Word meanings. In Barr, R. et al. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 690–724). Longman.Google Scholar
Ao, Q. (2021). The sociocultural-cognitive underpinnings in error correction: A descriptive study on acquisition of Chinese tones. International Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 2(2), 44–71.Google Scholar
Asher, J. (1969). The total physical response approach to second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 53(1), 3–17.Google Scholar
Aslin, R., Pisoni, D., Hennessy, B., & Perey, A. (1981). Discrimination of voice onset time by human infants: New findings and implications for the effect of early experience. Child Development, 52(4), 1135–1145.Google Scholar
Aziz-Zadeh, L., & Damasio, A. (2008). Embodied semantics for actions: Findings from functional brain imaging. Journal of Physiology Paris, 102(1–3), 35–39.Google Scholar
Baidu Baike. (2023). 雨. Retrieved January 27, 2023 from https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E9%9B%A8/5056714.Google Scholar
Baills, F., Suárez-González, N., González-Fuente, S., & Prieto, P. (2019). Observing and producing pitch gestures facilitates the learning of Mandarin Chinese tones and words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(1), 33–58.Google Scholar
Barchard, K., Grob, K., & Roe, M. (2017). Is sadness blue? The problem of using figurative language for emotions on psychological tests. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 443–456.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergen, B. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. [Class handout], LING 640.Google Scholar
Bergen, B. (2012). Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bergen, B., & Chang, N. (2013). Embodied construction grammar. In Hoffman, T. & Trousdale, G. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bergen, B., Lindsay, S., Matlock, T., & Narayanan, S. (2007). Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31(5), 733–764.Google Scholar
Bergen, B., Polley, C., & Wheeler, K. (2010). Language and inner space. In Evans, V. (Ed.), Language, cognition, and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 79–92). Equinox.Google Scholar
Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K. (2010). Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112(3), 150–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berman, R., & Slobin, D. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Best, C., & Tyler, M. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Munro, M. & Bohn, O.-S. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Boers, F. (2013). Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary: Assessment and integration. Language Teaching, 46(2), 208–224.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1977). Meaning and form. Longmans.Google Scholar
Borghi, A., & Cimatti, F. (2010). Embodied cognition and beyond: Acting and sensing the body. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 763–773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O., & McCormick, K. (2011). Do English and Mandarin speakers think differently about time? Cognition, 118(1), 123–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13, 185–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L., & Phillips, W. (2003). Sex, syntax and semantics. In Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 61–79). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bowdle, B., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradlow, A., Pisoni, D., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2299–2310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bréal, M. (1897). Essay on semantics [Essai de sémantique]. Hachette.Google Scholar
Brown, A. (2015). Universal development and L1–L2 convergence in bilingual construal of manner in speech and gesture in Mandarin, Japanese, and English. Modern Language Journal, 99, 66–82.Google Scholar
Brown, A., & Chen, J. (2013). Construal of manner in speech and gesture in Mandarin, English, and Japanese. Cognitive Linguistics, 24(4), 605–631.Google Scholar
Buchler, J. (Ed.) (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce. Dover.Google Scholar
Burnham, D., & Mattock, K. (2007). The perception of tones and phones. In Bohn, O.-S & Munro, M. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 259–280). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & Pagliuca, W. (1987). The evolution of future meaning. In Ramat, A. G. et al. (Eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (pp. 109–122). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cadierno, T. (2004). Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In Achard, M. & Niemeier, S. (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 13–49). Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadierno, T. (2008). Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. (Eds.), A handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 378–406). Routledge.Google Scholar
Cadierno, T. (2010). Motion in Danish as a second language: Does the learner’s L1 make a difference? In Han, Z.-H. & Cadierno, T. (Eds.), Linguistic relativity in second language acquisition: Thinking for speaking (pp. 1–33). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cao, Y., & Wang, L. (2017). Processing of emotional information in written language. Chinese Science Bulletin, 63(2), 148–163.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106(2), 579–593.Google Scholar
Chan, T., & Bergen, B. (2005). Writing direction influences spatial cognition. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 27. Retrieved January 27, 2023 from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4tt0k00j.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. (1948). Mandarin primer. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Y. (1970). Language and symbolic systems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, I., Long, Y., Lu, Q., & Huang, C. (2019). Metaphor detection: Leveraging culturally grounded eventive information. IEEE Access, 7, 10987–10998.Google Scholar
Chen, L. (2007). The acquisition and use of motion event expressions in Chinese. Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Chen, L., & Guo, J. (2009). Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently-framed language. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(9), 1749–1766.Google Scholar
Chen, Z. (1989). Theories of yin and yang, and of the five elements [阴阳五行]. In Jin, W. et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of family health [家庭医学全书] (pp. 997–1002). Shanghai Science and Technology Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, L. (2019). The application of TPR teaching methods in Mandarin class of America. Frontiers in Educational Research, 2(11), 10–15.Google Scholar
Cho, K. (2010). Fostering the acquisition of English prepositions by Japanese learners with networks and prototypes. In Knop, S. et al. (Ed.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (pp. 259–276). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 48, 83–121.Google Scholar
Choi, S., & Lantolf, J. (2008). Representation and embodiment of meaning in L2 communication: Motion events in the speech and gesture of advanced L2 Korean and L2 English speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 191–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (1997). Some properties and groupings of image schemas. In Verspoor, M. et al. (Eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning (pp. 3–15). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausner, T., & Croft, W. (1999). Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
Conca, F., Borsa, V., Cappa, S., & Catricalà, E. (2021). The multidimensionality of abstract concepts: A systematic review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 127, 474–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connell, L., & Lynott, D. (2009). Is a bear white in the woods? Parallel representation of implied object color during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(3), 573–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J., Klassen, A., Plano Clark, V., & Smith, K. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, United States National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Csábi, S. (2004). A cognitive linguistic view of polysemy in English and its implications for teaching. In Achard, M. & Niemeier, S. (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 233–256). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dapretto, M., Davies, M., Preifer, J., Scott, A., Sigman, M., Bookheimer, S., & Iacoboni, M. (2006). Understanding emotions in others: Mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders. Nature Neuroscience, 9(1), 28–30.Google Scholar
Davis, J., Coulson, S., Arnold, A., & Winkielman, P. (2021). Dynamic grounding of concepts: Implications for emotion and social cognition. In Robinson, M. & Thomas, L. (Eds.), Handbook of embodied psychology (pp. 23–42). Springer.Google Scholar
De Costa, P., Gajasinghe, K., Ojha, L., & Rabie-Ahmed, A. (2022). Bridging the researcher–practitioner divide through community-engaged action research: A collaborative autoethnographic exploration. The Modern Language Journal, 106(3), 547–563.Google Scholar
Della Putta, P. (2018). Embodied semantics and the mirror neurons: Past research and some proposals for the future. In Baicchi, A., Digonnet, R., & Sandford, J. L. (Eds.), Sensory perceptions in language, embodiment and epistemology (pp. 21–43). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, E., & Lakoff, G. (2005). Image schemas: From linguistic analysis to neural grounding. In Hampe, B. & Grady, J. (Eds.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 57–91). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dong, S., Yang, Y., Ren, H., & Huang, C. (2021). Directionality of atmospheric water in Chinese: A lexical semantic study based on linguistic ontology. SAGE Open, 11(1), at https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020988293.Google Scholar
Dove, G., Barca, L., Tummolini, L., & Borghi, A. (2022). Words have a weight: Language as a source of inner grounding and flexibility in abstract concepts. Psychological Research, 86, 2451–2467.Google Scholar
Du, X., & Kirkebæk, M. (Eds.) (2012). Exploring task-based PBL in Chinese teaching and learning. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Duan, Y. (1815). Commentary on the Explanation of Simple Characters and the Analysis of Compound Characters [说文解字注]. Annotated version of partially extant lexicographic text, Han Dynasty, c. 125 AD. Facsimile version (1998). Tiangong.Google Scholar
Eckerth, J. (2008). Investigating consciousness-raising tasks: Pedagogically targeted and non-targeted learning gains. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 121–145.Google Scholar
Ellis, N., & Wulff, S. (2020). Usage-based approaches to L2 acquisition. In VanPatten, B. et al. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (third edition) (pp. 63–85). Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, 1–46.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2016). Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 405–428.Google Scholar
Enkvist, N. (1990). Discourse comprehension, text strategies and style. Journal of the Australasian Universities Modern Language Association, 73, 166–180.Google Scholar
Evans, V. (2003). The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Evans, V. (2009). How words mean: Lexical concepts, cognitive models, and meaning construction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, V. (2013). Language and time: A cognitive linguistics approach. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, V. (2015). A unified account of polysemy within LCCM Theory. Lingua, 157, 100–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Faris, M., Best, C., & Tyler, M. (2018). Discrimination of uncategorised non-native vowel contrasts is modulated by perceived overlap with native phonological categories. Journal of Phonetics, 70, 1–19.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (2005). Compression and emergent structure. Language and Linguistics Taipei, 6(4), 523.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2003). Polysemy and conceptual blending. In Nerlich, B. et al. (Eds.), Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language (pp. 79–94). Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2008). Rethinking metaphor. In Gibbs, R. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 53–66). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, J. (2020). Advances in embodied construction grammar. Constructions and Frames, 12(1), 149–169.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15(1), 47–65.Google Scholar
Floyd, S., & Goldberg, A. (2020). Children make use of relationships across meanings in word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(1), 29–44.Google Scholar
Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119(2), 593–609.Google Scholar
Gandour, J. (1983). Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics, 11(2), 149–175.Google Scholar
Gandour, J. (1984). Tone dissimilarity judgments by Chinese listeners. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 12, 235–261.Google Scholar
Gao, Z. (2020). L2 learning of opaque Chinese compounds through elaborative encoding. Chinese as a Second Language, 55(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
García, P. (2018). Investigating the role of conscious conceptual manipulation in L2 development. In Lantolf, J. et al. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language development (pp. 181–196). Routledge.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (1989). Prospects and problems of prototype theory. Linguistics, 27, 587–612.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D., & Cuyckens, H. (2007). Introducing cognitive linguistics. In Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 3–21). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. (2008). Metaphor as structure-mapping. In Gibbs, R. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 109–128). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space → time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 537–565.Google Scholar
Geurts, K. (2003). Culture and the senses: Bodily ways of knowing in an African community. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2003). Embodied experience and linguistic meaning. Brain and Language, 84, 1–15.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., Beitel, D., Harrington, M., & Sanders, P. (1994). Taking a stand on the meaning of stand: Bodily experience as motivation for polysemy. Journal of Semantics, 11, 231–251.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R., & Colston, H. (1995). The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(4), 347–378.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1995). Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. In Simone, R. (Ed.), Iconicity in language (pp. 47–76). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. (2010). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1, 586–596.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A., & Kaschak, M. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A., Webster, B., Mouilso, E., Havas, D., & Lindeman, L. (2009). Gender, emotion, and the embodiment of language comprehension. Emotion Review, 1(2), 151–161.Google Scholar
Gobyn, S., & Lutas, L. (2013). Metalepsis out of bounds. ENTHYMEMA, 9, 157–162.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldstone, R., Kersten, A., & Carvalho, P. (2003). Concepts and categorization. In Healy, A. & Proctor, R. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology (pp. 599–621). Wiley.Google Scholar
Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “L” and “R.” Neuropsychologia, 9(3), 317–323.Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1998). The “conduit metaphor” revisited: A reassessment of metaphors for communication. In Koenig, J. (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 205–218). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grady, J. (1999). A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation versus resemblance. In Gibbs, R. & Steen, G. (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 79–100). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gu, Y., Mol, L., Hoetjes, M., & Swerts, M. (2017). Conceptual and lexical effects on gestures: The case of vertical spatial metaphors for time in Chinese. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 1048–1063.Google Scholar
Guo, H. (2017). A cognitive linguistics perspective on the polysemous features of time metaphor [从认知语言学视角看时间隐喻的多义性]. Journal of Jinzhong University [晋中学院学报], 34(4), 103–105.Google Scholar
Häggström, M. (Ed.) (2014). Medical gallery of Blausen Medical 2014. WikiJournal of Medicine 1(2), at https://doi.org/10.15347/wjm/2014.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, J. (1980). The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language, 56(3), 515–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, J. (1983). Iconic and economic motivation. Language, 59(4), 781–819.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1985). Natural syntax: Iconicity and erosion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hampe, B. (2005). Image schemas in cognitive linguistics: Introduction. In Hampe, B. & Grady, J. (Eds.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 1–12). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hampe, B., & Grady, J. (Eds.) (2005). From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harmon, Z., & Kapatsinski, V. (2017). Putting old tools to novel uses: The role of form accessibility in semantic extension. Cognitive Psychology, 98, 22–44.Google Scholar
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307.Google Scholar
Havas, D., Glenberg, A., & Rinck, M. (2007). Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(3), 436–441.Google Scholar
Hawkes, D. (Trans.) (2012). The Story of the Stone: The Golden Days (Volume I): The Golden Days, Chapters 1–26. Penguin.Google Scholar
Heine, B. (1993). Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P., & Traugott, E. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hsieh, L., Gandour, J., Wong, D., & Hutchins, G. (2001). Functional heterogeneity of inferior frontal gyrus is shaped by linguistic experience. Brain and Language, 76, 227–252.Google Scholar
Huang, C., Dong, S., Yang, Y., & Ren, H. (2021). From language to meteorology: Kinesis in weather events and weather verbs across Sinitic languages. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Huang, L. (2017). Corpus-based study of the grammaticalization and semantic networks of Chinese guo and le. Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Huang, L. (2021). “Can,” “could,” or “may” in Chinese? A usage-based perspective gleaned from diachronic corpus analysis. International Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 2(2), 7–31.Google Scholar
Huang, Y., Yang, S., Gao, L., Zhang, W., & Cui, X. (2007). An investigation of L2 acquisition of Chinese Bei constructions [汉语作为第二语言”被“字句习得的考察], Chinese Teaching in the World [世界汉语教学], 80(2), 76–90.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. (2000). Intentional and incidental second-language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258–286). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M., & Okada, H. (2008). Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition, 109, 54–65.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, N. (2018). The best of both worlds: Combining cognitive linguistics and pedagogic tasks to teach English conditionals. Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 668–693.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J., Strange, W., & Polka, L. (1995). Not everyone can tell a “rock” from a “lock”: Assessing individual differences in speech perception. In Lubinski, D. & Dawis, R. (Eds.), Assessing individual differences in human behavior: New concepts, methods, and findings (pp. 297–325). Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Jeong, H., Sugiura, M., Sassa, Y., Wakusawa, K., Horie, K., Sato, S., & Kawashima, R. (2010). Learning second language vocabulary: Neural dissociation of situation-based learning and text-based learning. Neuroimage, 50(2), 802–809.Google Scholar
Jiang, N. (2000). Lexical development and representation in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 47–77.Google Scholar
Jiang, N. (2002). Form-meaning mapping in vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), 617–637.Google Scholar
Jiang, S. (2017). The semantics of Chinese classifiers and linguistic relativity. Routledge.Google Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Z. (2010). Seven events in three languages: Culture-specific conceptualizations and their implications for FLT. In De Knop, S. et al. (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (pp. 137–166). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Z., Peng, X., & Chen, J.-Y. (2015). From corpus analysis to grammar instruction: Toward a usage-based constructionist approach to constructional stratification. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 50(2), 109–138.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (2005). The philosophical significance of image schemas. In Hampe, B. & Grady, J. (Eds.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 15–34). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (2017). Embodied mind, meaning, and reason: How our bodies give rise to understanding. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, R. (1981). Conceptualizing in Nakanai and English. In Franklin, K. (Ed.), Syntax and semantics in New Guinea languages (pp. 212–224). Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Juárez, F., Labrecque, D., & Frak, V. (2019). Assessing language-induced motor activity through event related potentials and the grip force sensor. Brain and Cognition, 135, article 103572, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.010.Google Scholar
Kaschak, M., Madden, C., Therriault, D., Yaxley, R., Aveyard, M., Blanchard, A., & Zwaan, R. (2005). Perception of motion affects language processing. Cognition, 94(3), B79–B89.Google Scholar
Ke, S. (2020). Review of research on learning and instruction with specific reference to reading Chinese as an additional language (1976–2018). Frontiers of Education in China, 15(1), 14–38.Google Scholar
Kimmel, M. (2005). Culture regained: Situated and compound image schemas. In Hampe, B. & Grady, J. (Eds.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 285–312). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Klein, D., Zatorre, R., Milner, B., & Zhao, V. (2001). A crosslinguistic PET study of tone perception in Mandarin Chinese and English speakers. NeuroImage, 13, 646–653.Google Scholar
Kogan, B., Muñoz, E., Ibáñez, A., & García, A. (2020). Too late to be grounded? Motor resonance for action words acquired after middle childhood. Brain and Cognition, 138, article 105509, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.010doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.105509.Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. Liveright.Google Scholar
Kovács, É. (2011). Polysemy in traditional vs. cognitive linguistics. Eger Journal of English Studies. XI, 3–18.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (1998). Are there any emotion-specific metaphors? In Athanasiadou, A. & Tabakowska, E. (Eds.), Speaking of emotions (pp. 127–152). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2003). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2019). Perception and metaphor. In Speed, L. et al. (Eds.), Perception metaphors (pp. 327–46). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1991). Cognitive versus generative linguistics: How commitments influence results. Language and Communication, 11(1/2), 53–62.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (second edition) (pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2014). Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: Metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, article 958, at https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lan, Y. (2019). Interlingual interfaces in Chinese language learning and its use: Exploring language transfer errors in Chinese writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(3), 437–445.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1990). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Volume II: Descriptive application. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1999). Grammar and conceptualization. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (2001). Cognitive linguistics, language pedagogy, and the English present tense. In Pütz, M. et al. (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics I: Theory and language acquisition (pp. 3–40), Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (2002). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar (second edition). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langendonck, W. (2007). Iconicity. In Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 394–418). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. (2003). Intrapersonal communication and internalization in the second language classroom. In Kozulin, A. et al. (Eds.), Vygotsky’s theory of education in cultural context (pp. 349–70). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leather, J. (1987). F0 pattern inference in the perceptual acquisition of second language tone. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquisition (pp. 59–80). Foris.Google Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2007). Polysemy, prototypes, and radial categories. In Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 139–169). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1979). Third-person pronouns and zero-anaphora in Chinese discourse. Syntax and Semantics, 12, 311–335.Google Scholar
Li, C., & Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, D. (1996). Grammatical error analysis of Chinese as a foreign language learners’ production [外国人学汉语语法偏误分析]. Beijing Language and Culture Press.Google Scholar
Li, Fengxiang. (1993). A diachronic study of V-V compounds in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo State University.Google Scholar
Li, Fuyin. (2002). The acquisition of metaphorical expressions, idioms, and proverbs by Chinese learners of English: A conceptual metaphor and image schema based approach. Doctoral dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Li, P., & Jeong, H. (2020). The social brain of language: Grounding second language learning in social interaction. npj Science of Learning, 5(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Li, S. (2020). Research on semantic derivation from the perspective of frame semantics: Taking the polysemy of “kan” as an example [框架语义学视阈下的词义衍生研究——以多义词“看”为例]. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science) [东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)], 303, 20–25.Google Scholar
Li, Y. (2014). The study on English and Chinese temporal metaphors from a cultural perspective. [文化视域下英汉时间的隐喻研究]. Journal of Weinan Normal University [渭南师范学院学报], 24, 30–33.Google Scholar
Li, Y., & Wu, L. (2018). Does your mind push? Mental simulation of context-independent monosyllabic verbs in Chinese. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(4), 149–154.Google Scholar
Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Children’s first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 168–196). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lin, N., Wang, X., Xu, Y., Wang, X., Hua, H., Zhao, Y., & Li, X. (2018). Fine subdivisions of the semantic network supporting social and sensory-motor semantic processing. Cerebral Cortex, 28(8), 2699–2710.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2001). The use of metaphor in university lectures and the problems that it causes for overseas students. Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 333–349.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2009). Applying cognitive linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2017). On the role of embodied cognition in the understanding and use of metonymy. In Hampe, B. (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 160–178). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Metaphoric competence and communicative language ability. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 268–294.Google Scholar
Liu, N. (2021). Verb bias in Chinese and its effect on L2 Chinese learners’ writing [汉语动词偏好在报刊中的体现以及对母语为英语的L2汉语学习者写作的影响]. International Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 2(2), 32–43.Google Scholar
Liu, N. (2023). Simulation semantics: How the body characterizes the mind. In Li, T. (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive semantics (pp. 235–266). Brill.Google Scholar
Liu, N., & Bergen, B. (2016). When do language comprehenders mentally simulate locations? Cognitive Linguistics, 27(2), 181–203.Google Scholar
Liu, S., & Hsieh, C. (2020). Developing metaphorical awareness and competence in Chinese as a foreign language through concept‐based instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 53(3), 478–504.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Pan, W., & Gu, W. (1983). Practical modern Chinese grammar [实用现代汉语语法]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Yao, T., Bi, N., Ge, L., & Shi, Y. (2017). Integrated Chinese (fourth edition). Cheng & Tsui.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In De Bot, K. et al. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Long, M. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In Lambert, R. & Shohamy, E. (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy: Essays in honor of A. Ronald Walton (pp. 178–192). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lu, J. (1984). Directional complement: A pedagogical view. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 19(2), 79–94.Google Scholar
Lu, M., Hallman, G., & Black, J. (2013). Chinese character learning: Using embodied animations in initial stages. Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 4(2), 1–24.Google Scholar
Lü, S. (1984). A collection of papers on Chinese grammar [汉语语法论文集]. Beijing Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Lü, S. (1999). Modern Chinese: 800 words (revised edition) [现代汉语八百词(增订本)]. Beijing Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Lucy, J. (1997). Linguistic relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 291–312.Google Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2016). Second language research: Methodology and design (second edition). Routledge.Google Scholar
McClelland, J., Fiez, J., & McCandliss, B. (2002). Teaching the /r/–/l/ discrimination to Japanese adults: Behavioral and neural aspects. Physiology and Behavior, 77 (4–5), 657–662.Google Scholar
Madden, C., & Zwaan, R. (2003). How does verb aspect constrain event representations? Memory and Cognition, 31(5), 663–672.Google Scholar
Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology Paris, 102, 59–70.Google Scholar
Makni, F. (2014). Applying cognitive linguistics to teaching polysemous vocabulary. Arab World English Journal, 5(1), 4–20.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. (1992). How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99(4), 587–604.Google Scholar
Mandler, J., & Cánovas, C. (2014). On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition, 6(4), 510–532.Google Scholar
Matlock, T. (2004). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory and Cognition, 32(8), 1389–1400.Google Scholar
Mazza, V., Turatto, M., & Umilta, C. (2005). Foreground–background segmentation and attention: A change blindness study. Psychological Research, 69, 201–210.Google Scholar
Meier, B., Robinson, M., & Clore, G. (2004). Why good guys wear white: Automatic inferences about stimulus valence based on brightness. Psychological Science, 15(2), 82–87.Google Scholar
Meier, B., Robinson, M., Crawford, L., & Ahlvers, W. (2007). When “light” and “dark” thoughts become light and dark responses: Affect biases brightness judgments. Emotion, 7(2), 366–376.Google Scholar
Moore, C., & Jongman, A. (1997). Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1864–1877.Google Scholar
Morimoto, S., & Loewen, S. (2007). A comparison of the effects of image-schema-based instruction and translation-based instruction on the acquisition of L2 polysemous words. Language Teaching Research, 11(3), 347–372.Google Scholar
Mortelmans, T. (2007). Modality in cognitive linguistics. In Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 869–889). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. (1996). On metaphoric representation. Cognition, 60(2), 99–108.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. (1997). On the role of context in first- and second-language vocabulary learning. In Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 64–83). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Negueruela-Azarola, E., & Fernández Parera, A. (2016). Explicit focus on meaning: Mindful conceptual engagement in the second language classroom. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 3, 195–218.Google Scholar
Niedenthal, P., Wood, A., & Rychlowska, M. (2014). Embodied emotion concepts. In Shapiro, L. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 258–267). Routledge.Google Scholar
Nikolova, M. (2015). The effect of a cognitive linguistics approach to teaching the semantic meanings of German modal verbs. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
Núñez, R., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401–450.Google Scholar
Oh, K.-J. (2003). Language, cognition, and development: Motion events in English and Korean. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Oosterwijk, S., Rotteveel, M., Fischer, A., & Hess, U. (2009). Embodied emotion concepts: How generating words about pride and disappointment influences posture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 457–466.Google Scholar
Ortega, L., Iwashita, N., Norris, J., & Rabie, S. (2002). An investigation of elicited imitation tasks in crosslinguistic second language acquisition research. Paper presented at the 20th Second Language Research Forum, Toronto, October 3–6, 2002.Google Scholar
Ortega, L., Tyler, A., Park, H., & Uno, M. (Eds.) (2016). The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Özçaliskan, Ş., & Slobin, D. (2003). Codability effects on the expression of manner of motion in Turkish and English. In Özsoy, A. S. et al. (Eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics (pp. 259–270). Bogaziçi University Press.Google Scholar
Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J. (2008). Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108, 155–184.Google Scholar
Pederson, E. (2007). Cognitive linguistics and linguistic relativity. In Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 1012–1044). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pepper, J. (2020). Rise of the monkey king: A story in simplified Chinese and English, 600 word vocabulary level. Imagin8 Press.Google Scholar
Peyraube, A. (2006). Motion events in Chinese: Diachronic study of directional complements. In Hickmann, M. & Robert, S. (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 121–135). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Phillips, W., & Boroditsky, L. (2003). Can quirks of grammar affect the way you think? Grammatical gender and object concepts. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 25, 928–933.Google Scholar
Polley, C. (2012). Metaphors for happiness in English and Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.Google Scholar
Polley, C. (2022). Elementary Mandarin I Textbook. Kapi‘olani Community College. Retrieved January 27, 2023 from https://human.libretexts.org/@go/page/65582.Google Scholar
Postle, N., McMahon, K., Ashton, R., Meredith, M., & Zubicaray, G. de (2008). Action word meaning representations in cytoarchitectonically defined primary and premotor cortices. Neuroimage, 43(3), 634–644.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(7), 576–582.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. (2013). How neurons make meaning: Brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract–symbolic semantics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(9), 458–470.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Ilmoniemi, R. (2005). Brain signatures of meaning access in action word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(6), 884–892.Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Dirven, R. (2007). Cognitive English grammar. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ramat, A. (1995). Iconicity in grammaticalization processes. In Simone, R. (Ed.), Iconicity in language (pp. 119–140). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Raposo, A., Moss, H., Stamatakis, E., & Tyler, L. (2009). Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 388–396.Google Scholar
Raukko, J. (2003). Polysemy as flexible meaning: Experiments with English get and Finnish pitää. In Nerlich, B. et al. (Eds.), Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language (pp. 161–194). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, D., & Matlock, T. (2007). The integration of figurative language and static depictions: An eye movement study of fictive motion. Cognition, 102(1), 129–138.Google Scholar
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. (2008). Conclusion: Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and L2 instruction – Issues for research. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 489–546). Routledge.Google Scholar
Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 245–266.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In Moore, T. (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 111–144). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In Rosch, E. & Lloyd, B. (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.Google Scholar
Rosch, E., Simpson, C., & Miller, R. (1976). Structural bases of typicality effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(4), 491–502.Google Scholar
Saalbach, H., & Imai, M. (2007). Scope of linguistic influence: Does a classifier system alter object concepts? Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 136(3), 485–501.Google Scholar
Saji, N., & Imai, M. (2013). Evolution of verb meanings in children and L2 adult learners through reorganization of an entire semantic domain: The case of Chinese carry/hold verbs. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 71–88.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1929). The status of linguistics as a science. In E. Sapir (1958), Culture, language and personality: Selected essays (ed. D. Mandelbaum). University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sato, M., & Bergen, B. (2013). The case of the missing pronouns: Does mentally simulated perspective play a functional role in the comprehension of person? Cognition, 127(3), 361–374.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). In Bally, C. & Sechehaye, A. (Eds.). The Philosophical Library. (Original work published 1916).Google Scholar
Schmid, H.-J. (2007). Entrenchment, salience and basic levels. In Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 117–138). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, H.-J. (Ed.) (2017). Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2010). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In Chan, W. et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of CLaSIC 2010, Singapore, December 2–4 (pp. 721–737). National University of Singapore, Centre for Language Studies.Google Scholar
Schmitt, B., & Zhang, S. (1998). Language structure and categorization: A study of Classifiers in consumer cognition, judgment, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 108–122.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 26–43.Google Scholar
Schwering, S., Ghaffari-Nikou, N., Zhao, F., Niedenthal, P., & MacDonald, M. (2021). Exploring the relationship between fiction reading and emotion recognition. Affective Science, 2(2), 178–186.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Conscious-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 159–168.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed second language acquisition: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 165–79.Google Scholar
Shen, J. (2002). Can the disposal construction be disposed of? On the subjectivity of the Ba construction in Mandarin Chinese [如何处置“处置式”？——论把字句的主观性]. Chinese Language [中国语文], 290(5), 387–400.Google Scholar
Shen, L., & Li, B. (2014). A corpus analysis of misuses of Ba constructions by L1 Korean learners and its pedagogical implications [基于语料库的韩国留学生“把”字句习得偏误分析及教学建议], Modern Chinese [现代语文], 2, 86–89.Google Scholar
Shi, W. (2011). The pattern shift of the motion event integration in Chinese: A typological study based on morpho-syntactic features [汉语运动事件词化类型的历时转移]. Studies of the Chinese Language [中国语文], 6, 483–498.Google Scholar
Shields, C. (2020). Aristotle’s psychology. In Zalta, E. (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (winter 2020 edition). Stanford University.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. (1991). Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sidhu, D., Vigliocco, G., & Pexman, P. (2020). Effects of iconicity in lexical decision. Language and Cognition, 12, 164–181.Google Scholar
Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory–visual equivalences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 14(1), 5–13.Google Scholar
Simmers, K. (2021). Education research is still too dense. We need more teacher–researcher partnerships. EdSurge. Retrieved January 27, 2023 from www.edsurge.com/news/2021-04-08-education-research-is-still-too-dense-we-need-more-teacher-researcher-partnerships.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1987). Thinking for speaking. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13, 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In Gumperz, J. & Levinson, S. (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1997). Mind, code, and text. In Bybee, J., Haiman, J., & Thompson, S.A. (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón (pp. 437–467). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (2000). Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In Niemeier, S. & Dirven, R. (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp. 107–138). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157–192). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Strömqvist, S. & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.), Relating events in narrative. Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (2006). What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In Hickmann, M. & Robert, S. (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 59–81). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sommer, M. (2002). Sex, law, and society in late imperial China. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Spivey, M., & Geng, J. (2001). Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research, 65(4), 235–241.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, M., & Rabagliati, H. (2015). How concepts and conventions structure the lexicon: Cross-linguistic evidence from polysemy. Lingua, 157, 124–152.Google Scholar
Stam, G. (2006). Thinking for speaking about motion: L1 and L2 speech and gesture. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 44, 143–169.Google Scholar
Su, D., Zhong, Y., Zeng, H., & Ye, H. (2013). Embodied semantic processing of Chinese action idioms: Evidence from an fMRI study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45(11), 1187–1199.Google Scholar
Svanlund, J. (2007). Metaphor and convention. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(1), 47–89.Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tabakowska, E. (2009). Iconicity. In Brisard, F. et al. (Eds.), Grammar, meaning and pragmatics (pp. 129–145). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tai, J. H.-Y. (1975). On two functions of place adverbials in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 3(2/3), 154–179.Google Scholar
Tai, J. H.-Y. (1985). Temporal sequence and Chinese word order. In Haiman, J. (Eds.), Iconicity in syntax (pp. 49–72). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tai, J. H.-Y. (1993). Iconicity: Motivations in Chinese grammar. In Eid, M. & Iverson, G. (Eds.), Principles and prediction: The analysis of natural language (pp. 153–174). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1978). Figure and ground in complex sentences. In Greenberg, J. (Ed.), Universals of human language (pp. 625–649). University of California Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, T. (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 49–100.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 480–519.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. 2: Typology and process in concept structuring. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2007). Attention phenomena. In Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 264–293). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2012). Main verb properties. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 1–23.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2016). Properties of main verbs. Cognitive Semantics, 2(2), 133–163.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. (2002). Cognitive grammar. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. (2003). Cognitive models of polysemy. In Nerlich, B. et al. (Eds.), Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language (pp. 31–48). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. (2008). Prototypes in cognitive linguistics. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 39–65). Routledge.Google Scholar
Teng, S. (2009). Chinese synonyms usage dictionary. Bookman Books.Google Scholar
Tian, L., Chen, H., Zhao, W., Wu, J., Zhang, Q., De, A., & Parviainen, T. (2020). The role of motor system in action-related language comprehension in L1 and L2: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 201, article 104714, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104714.Google Scholar
Tio, Y., & Lakshmanan, U. (2021). Implicit learning of Chinese numeral classifiers using the stimulus equivalence paradigm. International Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 2(2), 72–94.Google Scholar
Tolkien, J. R. R. (1937). The Hobbit. George Allen & Unwin. [French translation: F. Ledoux, Bilbo le Hobbit. Hachette, 1980.]Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Touplikioti, S. (2007). The teaching of the polysemous words “make” and “do” to Greek learners of English: A cognitive linguistic approach. Doctoral dissertation, University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Trahey, M., & White, L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 181–204.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 65, 31–55.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. (1995). Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Stein, D. & Wright, S. (Eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives (pp. 31–54). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traxler, M. (2012). Introduction to psycholinguistics: Understanding language science. Wiley.Google Scholar
Tseng, M., Hu, Y., Han, W., & Bergen, B. (2005). “Searching for happiness” or “full of joy?” Source domain activation matters. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 31, 359–370.Google Scholar
Turner, M. (1991). Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive sciences. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, M. (2006). Compression and representation. Language and Literature, 15(1), 17–27.Google Scholar
Tyler, A. (2008). Cognitive linguistics and second language instruction. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 456–488). Routledge.Google Scholar
Tyler, A. (2012). Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. Routledge.Google Scholar
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2001). The relation between experience, conceptual structure and meaning: Non-temporal uses of tense and language teaching. In Putz, M. et al. (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics: Theory, acquisition and language pedagogy (pp. 63–105). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2004). Applying cognitive linguistics to pedagogical grammar: The case of over. In Achard, M. & Niemeier, S. (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 257–280). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tyler, A., & Huang, L. (2018). Introduction. In Tyler, A. et al. (Eds.), What is applied cognitive linguistics?: Answers from current SLA research (pp. 1–33). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Tyler, A., Mueller, C., & Ho, V. (2010). Applying cognitive linguistics to instructed L2 learning: The English modals. AILA Review, 23(1), 30–49.Google Scholar
Tyler, M. (2019). PAM-L2 and phonological category acquisition in the foreign language classroom. In Nyvad, A. et al. (Eds.), A sound approach to language matters: In honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn (pp. 607–630). Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
US National Archives. (2023). The Declaration of Independence: What does it say? Retrieved January 27, 2023 from www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration/what-does-it-say.Google Scholar
Verhagen, A. (2007). Construal and perspectivisation. In Geeraerts, D. & Cuyckens, H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 48–81). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verspoor, M. (2007). Cognitive linguistics and its applications to second language teaching. In Cenoz, J. & Hornberger, N. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (second edition) (pp. 79–91). Springer.Google Scholar
Verspoor, M., & Lowie, W. (2003). Making sense of polysemous words. Language Learning, 53(3), 547–586.Google Scholar
Verspoor, M., & Tyler, A. (2009). Cognitive linguistics and second language learning. In Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 159–177). Emerald.Google Scholar
Waltz, T. (2015). TPRS: Day 1 Mandarin [video]. YouTube. Retrieved January 27, 2023 from https://youtu.be/D9jKfHRZQfs.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Li, J., Wang, X., Jiang, M., Cong, F., & de Vega, M. (2019). Embodiment effect on the comprehension of Mandarin manual action language: An ERP study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(3), 713–728.Google Scholar
Wang, L. (1947). Modern Chinese grammar [中国现代语法]. Chinese Bookshop.Google Scholar
Wang, L., Chen, Q., Chen, Y., & Zhong, R. (2019). The effect of sweet taste on romantic semantic processing: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, article 1573, at https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2019.01573.Google Scholar
Wang, X., & Chen, J. (2020). The acquisition of Mandarin consonants by English learners: The relationship between perception and production. Languages, 5(2), article 20, at https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5020020.Google Scholar
Wang, X., Wu, W., Ling, Z., Xu, Y., Fang, Y., & Bi, Y. (2018). Organizational principles of abstract words in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 28(12), 4305–4318.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Spence, M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(6), 3649–3658.Google Scholar
Wellsby, M., & Pexman, P. (2014). Developing embodied cognition: Insights from children’s concepts and language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(506), 1–10.Google Scholar
Wen, X. (2012). A daunting task: The acquisition of the Chinese Ba construction by nonnative speakers of Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 40(1), 216–240.Google Scholar
Werker, J., Gilbert, J., Humphrey, K., & Tees, R. (1981). Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. Child Development, 52(1), 349–355.Google Scholar
Werker, J., & Tees, R. (2002). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7(1), 49–63.Google Scholar
Whitney, W. (1877). The principle of economy as a phonetic force. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 8, 123–134.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. (1956). Language, thought and reality. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wikimedia Commons. (2023). Retrieved January 27, 2023 from https://commons.wikimedia.org.Google Scholar
Willems, R., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D. (2010). Body-specific representations of action verbs: Neural evidence from right- and left-handers. Psychological Science, 21(1), 67–74.Google Scholar
Wilson, N., & Gibbs, R. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 721–731.Google Scholar
Wiseman, N., & Ellis, A. (Trans.) (1985). Fundamentals of Chinese medicine. Paradigm.Google Scholar
Wu, H.-J. (2008). Understanding metaphor: Taiwanese students and English language metaphor. Masters thesis, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Wu, S. G. (2008). Metaphor, etymology, and culture: A corpus-based exploration and methodological reflection. China Academy of Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Wu, S.-L. (2011). Learning to express motion events in an L2: The case of Chinese directional complements. Language Learning, 61, 414–454.Google Scholar
Wu, S.-L. (2014). Influence of L1 thinking for speaking on use of an L2: The case of path expressions by English-speaking learners of Chinese. In Han, Z.-H. (Ed.), Studies in second language acquisition of Chinese (pp. 1–29). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Wu, S.-L. (2016a). Development of thinking for speaking: What role does language socialization play? The Modern Language Journal, 100(2), 446–465.Google Scholar
Wu, S.-L. (2016b). Listening for imagery by native speakers and L2 learners. Languages, 1(2), article 10, at https://doi.org/10.3390/languages1020010.Google Scholar
Wu, S.-L., Nunome, T., & Wang, J. (2022). Crosslinguistic influence in the conceptualization of motion events: A synthesis study on L2 acquisition of Chinese motion expressions. Second Language Research. Retrieved January 27, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221132205.Google Scholar
Wu, S.-L., & Ortega, L. (2013). Measuring global oral proficiency in second language acquisition research: A new elicited imitation test of L2 Chinese. Foreign Language Annals, 46, 680–704.Google Scholar
Xiao, G. (2004). Meaning, classification and usage of Chinese classifier ba – Oriented to research on cognitive explanation and function of second language teaching [汉语量词“把”的意义、分类及用法——面向第二语言教学的认知解释与功能研究]. Journal of Jianghan University (Humanities Sciences) [江汉大学学报(人文科学版)], 23(1), 5–10.Google Scholar
Yang, C., & Yu, A. (2019). The acquisition of Mandarin affricates by American L2 learners. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 17(2), 91–122.Google Scholar
Yang, D. (2003). Sequence of acquiring the directional complement by English-speaking learners of Chinese [英语母语学习者趋向补语的习得顺序]. World Chinese Teaching [世界汉语教学], 64(2), 52–65.Google Scholar
Yang, J., & Shu, H. (2011). Embodied representation of tool-use action verbs and hand action verbs: Evidence from a tone judgment task. Neuroscience Letters, 493, 112–115.Google Scholar
Yip, P.-C., & Rimmington, D. (2016). Chinese: A comprehensive grammar (second edition). Routledge.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (1995). Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. Metaphor and Symbol, 10(2), 59–92.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (1998). The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2002). Body and emotion: Body parts in Chinese expression of emotion. Pragmatics and Cognition, 10(1–2), 341–367.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2003). Chinese metaphors of thinking. Cognitive Linguistics, 14(2/3), 141–65.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2006). Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. Metaphor and Symbol, 10(2), 59–92.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2009). The Chinese HEART in a cognitive perspective: Culture, body, and language. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2011). Speech organs and linguistic activity/function in Chinese. In Maalej, Z. & Yu, N. (Eds.), Embodiment via body parts: Studies from various languages and cultures (pp. 117–148). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2012). The metaphorical orientation of time in Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(10), 1335–1354.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2013). The body in anatomy: Looking at “head” for the mind–body link in Chinese. In Caballero, R. & Díaz Vera, J. (Eds.), Sensuous cognition (pp. 53–74). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2014). Embodiment, culture, and language. In Sharifan, F. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 243–255). Routledge.Google Scholar
Yu, N. (2017). Life as opera: A cultural metaphor in Chinese. In Sharifan, F. (Ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics (pp. 65–87). Springer.Google Scholar
Yu, P. (1983). Allegory, allegoresis, and the classic of poetry. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 43(2), 377–412.Google Scholar
Yuan, F. (2018). Form-focused instruction and task-based language teaching in Chinese as a second language. In Ke, C. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of Chinese second language acquisition (pp. 415–431). Routledge.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. (1985). Emotion and facial efference: A theory reclaimed. Science, 228(4695), 15–21.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R., Adelmann, P., Murphy, S., & Niedenthal, P. (1987). Convergence in the physical appearance of spouses. Motivation and Emotion, 11(4), 335–346.Google Scholar
Zarei, G., Darakeh, M., & Daneshkhah, N. (2016). Effect of using image-schemas on learning L2 prepositions and enhancing learner autonomy: A dynamic system theory and cognitive linguistics-inspired approach. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 118–137.Google Scholar
Zhang, J. (2013). Effects of providing the polysemy core meaning on inferring other meaning of polysemy [提供核心义对汉语第二语言学习者多义词词义猜测的影响]. Applied Linguistics [语言文字应用], 4, 127–136.Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Yang, J., Wang, R., & Li, P. (2020). A neuroimaging study of semantic representation in first and second languages. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(10), 1223–1238.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. (2013). Spatial representation of topological concepts IN and ON: A comparative study of English and Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Sun, Y., & Wang, Z. (2018). Representation of action semantics in the motor cortex and Broca’s area. Brain and Language, 179, 33–41.Google Scholar
Zhao, Q. (2018). Synaesthesia, metaphor and cognition: A corpus-based study on synaesthetic adjectives in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. (2011). A tree in the wood: A review of research on L2 Chinese acquisition. Second Language Research, 27(4), 559–572.Google Scholar
Zheng, L., Huang, P., Zhong, X., Li, T., & Mo, L. (2017). Color adaptation induced from linguistic description of color. PLoS One, 12(3), article e0173755, at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173755.Google Scholar
Zhong, C., & Leonardelli, G. (2008). Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science, 19(9), 838–842.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R., Madden, C., Yaxley, R., & Aveyard, M. (2004). Moving words: Dynamic representations in language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 28(4), 611–619.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R., & Pecher, D. (2012). Revisiting mental simulation in language comprehension: Six replication attempts. PLoS One, 7(12), article e51382, at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051382.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R., Stanfield, R., & Yaxley, R. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13(2), 168–171.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Shu-Ling Wu, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Lihong Huang, Georgetown University, Washington DC, Carl Polley, University of Hawaii
  • Book: Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition of Chinese
  • Online publication: 01 February 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009186711.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Shu-Ling Wu, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Lihong Huang, Georgetown University, Washington DC, Carl Polley, University of Hawaii
  • Book: Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition of Chinese
  • Online publication: 01 February 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009186711.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Shu-Ling Wu, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Lihong Huang, Georgetown University, Washington DC, Carl Polley, University of Hawaii
  • Book: Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition of Chinese
  • Online publication: 01 February 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009186711.011
Available formats
×