Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figures
- Acknowledgements
- Notes on contributors
- one Theoretical framework for children's internet use
- two Methodological framework: the EU Kids Online project
- three Cognitive interviewing and responses to EU Kids Online survey questions
- four Which children are fully online?
- five Varieties of access and use
- six Online opportunities
- seven Digital skills in the context of media literacy
- eight Between public and private: privacy in social networking sites
- nine Experimenting with the self online: a risky opportunity
- ten Young Europeans’ online environments: a typology of user practices
- eleven Bullying
- twelve ‘Sexting’: the exchange of sexual messages online among European youth
- thirteen Pornography
- fourteen Meeting new contacts online
- fifteen Excessive internet use among European children
- sixteen Coping and resilience: children's responses to online risks
- seventeen Agents of mediation and sources of safety awareness: a comparative overview
- eighteen The effectiveness of parental mediation
- nineteen Effectiveness of teachers’ and peers’ mediation in supporting opportunities and reducing risks online
- twenty Understanding digital inequality: the interplay between parental socialisation and children's development
- twenty-one Similarities and differences across Europe
- twenty-two Mobile access: different users, different risks, different consequences?
- twenty-three Explaining vulnerability to risk and harm
- twenty-four Relating online practices, negative experiences and coping strategies
- twenty-five Towards a general model of determinants of risk and safety
- twenty-six Policy implications and recommendations: now what?
- Appendix Key variables used in EU Kids Online analyses
- Index
nineteen - Effectiveness of teachers’ and peers’ mediation in supporting opportunities and reducing risks online
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 September 2022
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figures
- Acknowledgements
- Notes on contributors
- one Theoretical framework for children's internet use
- two Methodological framework: the EU Kids Online project
- three Cognitive interviewing and responses to EU Kids Online survey questions
- four Which children are fully online?
- five Varieties of access and use
- six Online opportunities
- seven Digital skills in the context of media literacy
- eight Between public and private: privacy in social networking sites
- nine Experimenting with the self online: a risky opportunity
- ten Young Europeans’ online environments: a typology of user practices
- eleven Bullying
- twelve ‘Sexting’: the exchange of sexual messages online among European youth
- thirteen Pornography
- fourteen Meeting new contacts online
- fifteen Excessive internet use among European children
- sixteen Coping and resilience: children's responses to online risks
- seventeen Agents of mediation and sources of safety awareness: a comparative overview
- eighteen The effectiveness of parental mediation
- nineteen Effectiveness of teachers’ and peers’ mediation in supporting opportunities and reducing risks online
- twenty Understanding digital inequality: the interplay between parental socialisation and children's development
- twenty-one Similarities and differences across Europe
- twenty-two Mobile access: different users, different risks, different consequences?
- twenty-three Explaining vulnerability to risk and harm
- twenty-four Relating online practices, negative experiences and coping strategies
- twenty-five Towards a general model of determinants of risk and safety
- twenty-six Policy implications and recommendations: now what?
- Appendix Key variables used in EU Kids Online analyses
- Index
Summary
Introduction
A distinctive feature of the EU Kids Online survey is that it asked children about mediation of internet use practised by parents, teachers and peers (Livingstone et al, 2011). This chapter starts from the assumption that these three agents, by virtue of their different social relationships with children, play distinct roles in influencing children’s online experiences, both positively and negatively. The chapter evaluates the effectiveness of mediation by teachers and peers in supporting online opportunities and in reducing risks and harm.
Teachers’ mediation
Parents often expect teachers to act as coach or facilitator in relation to their children's internet use, in other words to act ‘in loco parentis’ (Wishart, 2004, p 200). There is a quite long tradition of research examining the role of parental mediation of their children's (new) media use. Work on teachers’ mediation, however, is more recent (cf Hasebrink et al, 2009; Inan et al, 2010; Zhao et al, 2011), and most studies (see, for example, Wishart, 2004; Berrier, 2007) do not differentiate between different types of mediation, or ask how teachers’ mediation is related to online risks and harm experienced by children.
Research indicates that teachers are concerned mainly with internet safety. Rather than engaging in active mediation, teachers tend to apply rules that restrict children's internet use, but which also hinder the development of good internet safety practices and reduce the chances for children to explore online opportunities (Wishart, 2004).
Although the support given by teachers has been shown to have a weak influence on children's intrinsic motivation to go online, some of the motivation for children to explore the internet is related to use of this technology for school assignments (Zhao et al, 2011). In relation to more advanced usage than is required for schoolwork, however, teachers’ mediation is the weakest predictor of children's online content creation (Kalmus et al, 2009b).
Peer mediation
The role played by peers may also be important for shaping the online practices of young people (cf Hasebrink et al, 2009; see also Chapter 1 in this volume), although relatively little is known about their influence. Livingstone and Bober (2005) found that compared to parents and teachers, peers may be less important for help related to using the internet, but may have a significant impact on young people’s intrinsic motivations for going online (Zhao et al, 2011).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Children, Risk and Safety on the InternetResearch and Policy Challenges in Comparative Perspective, pp. 245 - 256Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2012