Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:26:28.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2017

Edited by
Marta Infantino  and
Eleni Zervogianni
Marta Infantino
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Trieste
Eleni Zervogianni
Affiliation:
Aristotle University, Thessaloniki
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Causation in European Tort Law , pp. 667 - 704
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, K. S., ‘Self-Proving Causation’ (2013) 99 Virginia Law Review 1811–53Google Scholar
Abraham, K. S., The Forms and Functions of Tort Law, 2nd ed. (New York: Foundation Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Agostini, F., ‘La tutela delle malattie professionali dopo la sentenza della Corte Costituzionale del 18 febbraio 1988 n. 179’ (1988) III Rivista giurisprudenza del lavoro 3–30Google Scholar
Akkermans, A. J., ‘Causaliteit bij letselschade en medische expertise’ (2003) 2 Tijdschrift voor Vergoeding Personenschade 93–104Google Scholar
Akkermans, A. J., ‘Proportionele aansprakelijkheid bij onzeker causaal verband’ (diss. Tilburg) (Deventer: W. E. J. Tjeenk Willink, 1997)Google Scholar
Akkermans, A. J., ‘Oorzakelijk verband’, in Onrechtmatige daad BW-Krant Jaarboek 1996 (Deventer: Gouda Quint, 1996)Google Scholar
Akkermans, A. J. and van Dijk, C. H., ‘Proportionele aansprakelijkheid, omkeringsregel, bewijslastverlichting en eigen schuld: een inventarisatie van de stand van zaken’ (2012) 17 Aansprakelijkheid, Verzekering en Schade 157–77Google Scholar
Alarcão, R., Direito das obrigações (Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra, 1983)Google Scholar
Alibrandi, G., Infortuni sul lavoro e malattie professionali (Milan: Giuffrè, 2002)Google Scholar
Almeida Costa, M. J., Direito das obrigações, 12th ed. (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2008)Google Scholar
Almeida Costa, M. J., ‘O concurso da responsabilidade civil contratual e extracontratual’, in Ab uno ad omnes – 75 anos da Coimbra Editora (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 1995), pp. 555–65Google Scholar
Alpa, G., La responsabilità civile. Parte generale (Turin: Utet, 2010)Google Scholar
Alpa, G. and Chiodi, G. (eds.), Il progetto italo-francese delle obbligazioni (1927). Un modello di armonizzazione nell’epoca della ricodificazione (Milan: Giuffrè, 2007)Google Scholar
American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law Third, Torts: Liability for Physical and Emotional Harm (St. Paul Minn.: American Law Institute, 2010)Google Scholar
American Law Institute, Model Penal Code and Commentaries (St. Paul Minn.: American Law Institute, 1985)Google Scholar
American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law Second, Torts (St. Paul Minn.: American Law Institute, 1965)Google Scholar
American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law, Torts (St. Paul Minn.: American Law Institute, 1934)Google Scholar
Anderson, W. L., Levitan, L. and Tuckley, K., ‘The “Any Exposure” Theory Round II - Court Review of Minimal Exposure Expert Testimony in Asbestos and Toxic Tort Litigation Since 2008’ (2012) 22 Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy 1–48Google Scholar
Andersson, H. Gränsproblem i skadeståndsrätten (Uppsala: Iustus, 2013)Google Scholar
Andersson, H., ‘The Tort Law Culture(s) of Scandinavia’ (2012) 3 Journal of European Tort Law 210–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, H., Skyddsändamål och adekvans (Uppsala: Iustus, 1993)Google Scholar
Andrade, M., Teoria geral das obrigações, 3rd ed. (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 1966)Google Scholar
Antolisei, F., Il rapporto di causalità nel diritto penale (Turin: Giappichelli, 1960)Google Scholar
Antonov, D., Tort Law (Непозволено увреждане) (Sofia: Nauka I Izkustvo, 1965)Google Scholar
Antunes Varela, J. M., Das obrigações em geral, I, 10th ed. (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2000)Google Scholar
Apathy, P., ‘Zur Haftung bei überholender Kausalität’, in Festschrift Koziol (Vienna: Sramek Verlag, 2010), pp. 515–28Google Scholar
Apostolov, I., Law of Obligations, Part One (Облигационно право, Част първа) (Sofia: BAN, 1990)Google Scholar
Araújo, F., A procriação assistida e o problema da santidade da vida (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 1999)Google Scholar
Argiriadis, A., Legal Issues, vol. A (Νομικά θέματα) (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 1978)Google Scholar
Armstrong, D., ‘The Open Door: Counterfactual versus Singularist Theories of Causation’, in Sankey, H. (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature (Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic, 1999), pp. 175–85Google Scholar
Askeland, B., Tapsfordelning og regress ved erstatningsoppgjör (Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, 2006)Google Scholar
Auletta, G., ‘Revocatoria fallimentare ed obbligo di corrispondere il valore del bene alienato’ (1956) III Foro padano 57–67Google Scholar
Azevedo de Almeida, M., ‘A responsabilidade civil perante os investidores por realização defeituosa de relatórios de auditoria, recomendações de investimento e relatórios de notação de risco’ (2010) Cadernos da Comissão do Mercado de Valores Mobiliários 9–31Google Scholar
Azevedo de Almeida, M., A responsabilidade civil do banqueiro perante os credores da empresa financiada (Coimbra: Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra / Coimbra Editora 2003)Google Scholar
Bączyk-Rozwadowska, K., ‘Medical Malpractice and Compensation in Poland’ (2011) 86 Chicago-Kent Law Review 1217–61Google Scholar
Bailey, S. H., ‘Causation in Negligence: What Is a Material Contribution?’ (2010) 30 Legal Studies 167–85Google Scholar
Bagińska, E., Odpowiedzialność deliktowa w razie niepewności związku przyczynowego. Studium prawnoporównawcze (Toruń: TNOiK, 2013)Google Scholar
Bagińska, E., ‘A Polish Perspective on the House of Lords Judgment in Corr v. IBC Vehicles LTD’ (2010) 18 European Review of Private Law 667–79Google Scholar
Bagińska, E., ‘Poland’, in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2006 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2008), pp. 373–93Google Scholar
Bagińska, E., ‘Overview of Polish Private Law. Tort Law and Property Law’, in Bussani, M. and Mattei, U. (eds.), Opening Up European Tort Law (Munich: Sellier, 2007), pp. 233–43Google Scholar
Bagińska, E., Odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza za wykonywanie władzy publicznej (Warsaw: C. H. Beck, 2006)Google Scholar
Bagińska, E., Odpowiedzialność za produkt w USA (Toruń: TNOiK, 1999)Google Scholar
Bagshaw, R., ‘Causing the Behaviour of Others and Other Causal Mixtures’, in Goldberg, R. (ed.), Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011), pp. 361–82Google Scholar
Bamberger, H. G. and Roth, H. (eds.), Beck’scher Online-Kommentar BGB, 37th ed. (Munich: Beck, 2015)Google Scholar
von Bar, C. (ed.), Principles of European Law. Non-Contractual Liability Arising Out of Damage Caused to Another (Munich: Sellier, 2009)Google Scholar
von Bar, C., The Common European Law of Torts, vol. II (Oxford: Clarendon, 2000)Google Scholar
von Bar, C., ‘The Study Group on a European Civil Code’, in European Parliament, The Private Law Systems in the EU: Discrimination on Grounds of Nationality and the Need for a European Civil Code, Working Paper, Legal Affairs Series, JURI 103 EN, 1999, 130–5Google Scholar
von Bar, C., The Common European Law of Torts, vol. I (Oxford: Clarendon, 1998)Google Scholar
von Bar, C., Clive, E., Beale, H. and Schulte-Nölke, H. (eds.), Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law. Draft Common Frame of Reference (Munich: Sellier, 2009)Google Scholar
Barta, H., Zivilrecht: Grundriss und Einführung in das Rechtsdenken (Vienna: WUV-Univ.-Verl., 2004)Google Scholar
Baumgartner, A., Die (Dritt-)Haftung von Ratingagenturen und anderen Informationsexperten (Vienna: Verlag Österreich, 2016)Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T. and Rosenberg, A., Hume and the Problem of Causation (New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Behren, M. A. and Anderson, W. L., ‘The “Any Exposure” Theory: An Unsound Basis for Asbestos Causation and Expert Testimony’ (2008) 37 Southwestern University Law Review 479–510Google Scholar
Bengtsson, B., Skadestånd för miljöskada (Stockholm: Norstedts juridik, 2011)Google Scholar
Bengtsson, B., Försäkringsavtalsrätt (Stockholm: Norstedts juridik, 2006)Google Scholar
Bengtsson, B., 14 uppsatser 1983–1991 (Stockholm: Norstedts juridik, 1992)Google Scholar
Bengtsson, B., Om jämkning av skadestånd (Stockholm: Norstedts juridik, 1982)Google Scholar
Bengtsson, B. and Ullman, H., Produktansvaret (Uppsala: Iustus, 2001)Google Scholar
Ben-Shahar, O., ‘Causation and Foreseeability’, in Faure, M. (ed.), Tort Law and Economics (Encyclopedia of Law and Economics), 2nd ed. (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2007), pp. 83–108Google Scholar
Biard, J.-F., ‘Les agences de notation de crédit’, La semaine juridique (Entreprises et Affaires) (2011) n° 27, 7 Juillet 1524–5Google Scholar
Bieniek, G., Komentarz do kodeksu cywilnego. Księga trzecia. Zobowiązania, vol. 1, 7th ed. (Warsaw: Lexisnexis, 2006)Google Scholar
Bikelis, S., ‘Neturtinės žalos atlyginimas (?) baudžiamosiose bylose dėl gyvybės atėmimo ir sunkaus sveikatos sutrikdymo’ (‘Compensation (?) of non-pecuniary damage in criminal cases for personal injuries and death’) (2011) 4(74) Teisės problemos 5–51Google Scholar
Birnbacher, D. and Hommen, D., ‘Omissions as Causes – Genuine, Quasi, or not at All?’, in Kahmen, B. and Stepanians, M. (eds.), Critical Essays on “Causation and Responsibility” (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 133–56Google Scholar
Bloch Ehlers, A. and Ulfbeck, V. G., ‘Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability in Denmark’, in Gilead, I., Green, M. D. and Koch, B. A. (eds.), Proportional Liability: Analytical and Comparative Perspectives (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 117–19Google Scholar
Bollenberger, R., ‘Das Kreditgeschäft’, in Apathy, P., Iro, G. and Koziol, H. (eds.), Österreichisches Bankvertragsrecht IV, 2nd ed. (Vienna: Springer, 2012), pp. 1–208Google Scholar
van Boom, W. H. and Giesen, I., ‘The Netherlands’, in Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B. A. and Zimmemann, R. (eds.), Digest of European Tort Law, I, Essential Cases on Natural Causation (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2007)Google Scholar
Borghetti, J. S., ‘Causation in Hepatitis B. Vaccination Litigation in France: Breaking Through Scientific Uncertainty?’, (2016) 91 Chicago-Kent Law Review 543–66Google Scholar
Borghetti, J. S., ‘Litigation on Hepatitis B’ Vaccination and Demyelinating Diseases in France: Breaking through Scientific Uncertainty?’, in Martín-Casals, M. and Papayannis, D. M. (eds.), Uncertain Causation in Tort Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 11–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borghetti, J. S., ‘France’, in Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B. A. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), Digest of European Tort Law, I, Essential Cases on Natural Causation (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2007)Google Scholar
Brandão Proença, J. C., Direito das obrigações. Relatório sobre o programa, o conteúdo e os métodos de ensino da disciplina (Porto: Universidade Católica, 2007)Google Scholar
Brandão Proença, J. C., A conduta do lesado como pressuposto e critério de imputação do dano extracontratual (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 1997)Google Scholar
Brüggemeier, G., Haftungsrecht: Struktur, Prinzipien, Schutzbereich (Berlin: Springer, 2016)Google Scholar
Brüggemeier, G., Tort Law in the European Union (The Hague: Kluwer, 2015)Google Scholar
Brüggemeier, G., Common Principles of Tort Law (London: BIICL, 2004)Google Scholar
Brüggemeier, G., Colombi, Ciacchi A. and O’Callaghan, P. (eds.), Personality Rights in European Tort Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Brun, P., Responsabilité civile extracontractuelle, 2nd ed. (Paris: Litec, 2009)Google Scholar
Brun, P., ‘Causalité juridique et causalité scientifique’, in ‘Les distorsions du lien de causalité en droit de la responsabilité civile’ (2007) 40 Revue Lamy Droit civil, suppl. no. 2630Google Scholar
Brunner, C. J. H., ‘Causaliteit en toerekening van schade’ (1981) 29 Verkeersrecht 210–7Google Scholar
von Buri, M., Über Causalität und deren Verantwortung (Leipzig: Gebhardt, 1873)Google Scholar
Burrows, A., ‘Uncertainty about Uncertainty: Damages for Loss of a Chance’ (2008) Journal of Personal Injury Law 31–43Google Scholar
Busnelli, F. D. and Comandé, G., ‘Italy’, in Spier, J. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Causation (The Hague: Kluwer, 2000), pp. 79–92Google Scholar
Bussani, M., Il diritto dell’Occidente. Geopolitica delle regole globali (Turin: Einaudi, 2010)Google Scholar
Bussani, M., ‘European Tort Law – A Way Forward?’, in Id. (ed.), European Tort Law. Eastern and Western Perspectives (Berne: Stämpfli, 2007), p. 365–78Google Scholar
Bussani, M., ‘Intention et lien de causalité dans le droit comparé de la responsabilité civile (la fable très peu convenue de la malice qui accroche)’, in De tous horizons. Mélanges Xavier Blanc-Jouvan (Paris: Société de législation comparée, 2005), p. 459–71Google Scholar
Bussani, M., “Integrative’ Comparative Law Enterprises and the Inner Stratification of Legal Systems’ (2000) 8 European Review of Private Law 85–99Google Scholar
Bussani, M., La colpa soggettiva. Modelli di valutazione della colpa extracontrattuale (Padua: Cedam, 1991)Google Scholar
Bussani, M. and Infantino, M., ‘Tort Law and Legal Cultures’ (2015) 63 American Journal of Comparative Law 77–108Google Scholar
Bussani, M. and Infantino, M., ‘Harmonization of Tort Law in Europe’, in Marciano, A. and Ramello, G.B. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Munich: Springer, 2014), pp. 1–22Google Scholar
Bussani, M. and Infantino, M., ‘Fault, Causation and Damage in the Law of Negligence: A Comparative Appraisal’, in Ciacchi, A. Colombi, Godt, C., Rott, P. and Smith, L. J. (eds.), Haftungsrecht im dritten Millennium - Liability in the Third Millennium. Liber Amicorum Gert Brüggemeier (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2009), pp. 145–56Google Scholar
Bussani, M., Infantino, M. and Werro, F., ‘The Common Core Sound: Short Notes on Themes, Harmonies and Disharmonies in European Tort Law’ (2009) 20 King’s Law Journal 239–55Google Scholar
Bussani, M. and Mattei, U. (eds.), Opening Up European Tort Law (Munich: Sellier, 2007)Google Scholar
Bussani, M. and Mattei, U., ‘Le fonds commun du droit privé europeén’ (2000) 52 Revue internationale de droit comparé 29–48Google Scholar
Bussani, M. and Mattei, U., ‘The Common Core Approach to European Private Law’ (1997–1998) 3 Columbia Journal of European Law 339–56Google Scholar
Bussani, M. and Palmer, V. V., Pure Economic Loss in Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Bussani, M. and Sebok, A. J. (eds.), Comparative Tort Law. Global Perspectives (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2015)Google Scholar
Busto Lago, J. M., ‘Materiales para la construcción de la responsabilidad civil de los terceros de confianza: perspectiva desde la responsabilidad civil de auditores y de las agencias de rating y la teoría de las flood gates’ (2014) 18 Anuario da Facultade de Dereito da Universidade da Coruña 31–64Google Scholar
Busto Lago, J. M., and Reglero Campos, L. F. (eds.), Lecciones de responsabilidad civil, 2nd ed. (Navarra: Thomson-Aranzadi, 2012)Google Scholar
Bydlinski, F., ‘Methodological Approaches to Tort Law of the ECHR’, in Fenyves, A., Karner, E., Koziol, H. and Steiner, E. (eds.), Tort Law in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2011), pp. 72–91Google Scholar
Bydlinski, F., ‘Causation as a Legal Phenomenon’, in Tichý, L. (ed.), Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Karlowa, 2007), p. 7–26Google Scholar
Bydlinski, F., ‘Die Verursachung im Entwurf eines neuen Schadenersatzrecht’, in Griss, I., Kathrein, G. and Koziol, H. (eds.), Entwurf eines neuen österreichischen Schadenersatzrechts (Vienna: Springer, 2006), pp. 37–45Google Scholar
Bydlinski, F., ‘Haftungsgrund und Zufall als alternativ mögliche Schadensursachen’, in Festschrift Frotz (Vienna: Mainz, 1993), pp. 3–10Google Scholar
Bydlinski, F., ‘Aktuelle Streitfragen um die alternative Kausalität’, in Festschrift Beitzke (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1979), pp. 3–34Google Scholar
Bydlinski, F., Probleme der Schadensverursachung nach deutschem und österreichischem Recht (Stuttgart: F. Enke, 1964)Google Scholar
Bydlinski, F., ‘Haftung bei alternativer Kausalität’ (1959) Juristische Blätter 1–13Google Scholar
von Caemmerer, E., Das Problem des Kausalzusammenhangs im Privatrecht (Freiburg: Schutz, 1956)Google Scholar
Calabresi, G., ‘Concerning Cause and the Law of Torts: An Essay for Harry Kalven’ (1975) 43 University of Chicago Law Review 69–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calamandrei, P., Studi sul processo civile, III (Padua: Cedam, 1934)Google Scholar
Calvão da Silva, J., Responsabilidade civil do produtor (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 1990)Google Scholar
Cane, P., The Anatomy of Tort Law (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 1997)Google Scholar
Capecchi, M., Il nesso di causalità (Padua: Cedam, 2002)Google Scholar
Capozzi, G., ‘Risarcimento dei danni e svalutazione della moneta’ (1945) Diritto e giurisprudenza 74–77Google Scholar
Cardona Ferreira, R., ‘The Loss of Chance in Civil Law Countries: A Comparative and Critical Analysis’ (2013) 20 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 53–74Google Scholar
Cardona Ferreira, R., ‘A perda de chance — análise comparativa e perspetivas de ordenação sistemática’ (2012) 144 O Direito 28–57Google Scholar
Cardona Ferreira, R., Indemnização do interesse contratual positivo e perda de chance (em especial, na contratação pública) (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2011)Google Scholar
Carlsson, M., Arbetsskada. Samspelet mellan skadestånd och andra ersättningsordningar (Stockholm: Jure, 2008)Google Scholar
Carnap, R., An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (edited by Gardner, M.), corrected ed. (New York: Dover, 1995)Google Scholar
Carnap, R., Meaning and Necessity—A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1956)Google Scholar
Carneiro da Frada, M., ‘Danos societários e governação de sociedades (corporate governance)’ (2012) Cadernos de direito privado, special edition, II Seminário dos Cadernos de Direito Privado. Responsabilidade civil 31–44Google Scholar
Carneiro da Frada, M., ‘Sociedades e notação do risco (rating) – a protecção dos investidores’, in II Congresso Direito das Sociedades em Revista (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2012), pp. 341–6Google Scholar
Carneiro da Frada, M., ‘A própria vida como dano? – Dimensões civis e constitucionais de uma questão-limite’, in Leite de Campos, D. and de Abreu Chinelatto, S. (eds.), Pessoa humana e direito (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2009), pp. 259–94Google Scholar
Carneiro da Frada, M., ‘A protecção juscivil da vida pré-natal. Sobre o estatuto jurídico do embrião’ (2008) Direito e justiça 134–55Google Scholar
Carneiro da Frada, M., Direito civil, Responsabilidade civil. O método do caso (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2006)Google Scholar
Carneiro da Frada, M., Teoria da confiança e responsabilidade civil (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2004)Google Scholar
Carnevali, U., ‘Omessa informazione da parte del medico, danno da trattamento terapeutico e ipotetica scelta del paziente’ (2010) Responsabilità civile e previdenza 2181–7Google Scholar
Carpenter, C. E., ‘Concurrent Causation’ (1935) 83 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 941–52Google Scholar
Carval, S., La responsabilité civile dans sa fonction de peine privée (Paris: LGDJ, 1995)Google Scholar
Catala, P. and Weir, J. A., ‘Delict and Torts: A Study in Parallel – Part IV’ (1965) 39 Tulane Law Review 701–16Google Scholar
Catalucci, A., ‘In ordine al quesito se la nascita di un figlio non voluto costituisca danno risarcibile ai sensi dell’art. 2043’ (1983) Rivista italiana di medicina legale 812–13Google Scholar
Cendon, P., Il dolo nella responsabilità extracontrattuale (Turin: Giappichelli, 1976)Google Scholar
Chabas, F., ‘Bilan de quelques années de jurisprudence en matière de rôle causal’ (1970) Dalloz chr. 113Google Scholar
Chabas, F., L’influence de la pluralité de causes sur le droit à réparation (Paris: LGDJ, 1967)Google Scholar
Chamallas, M. and Wriggins, J. B., The Measure of Injury (New York: NYU Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Charalambakis, A., Medical Liability and Ethics (Ιατρική ευθύνη και δεοντολογία) (Athens, Komotini: Ant. N. Sakkoulas, 1993)Google Scholar
Chiolos, K., ‘Liability of the State for Damages from Illegal Acts or Omissions of its Organs’ (‘Η αποζημιωτική ευθύνη του Δημοσίου για παράνομες πράξεις ή παραλείψεις των οργάνων του’) (2007) 55 Nomiko Vima 1727–29Google Scholar
Clark, T. and Nolan, D., ‘A Critique of Chester v. Afshar’ (2014) 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 659–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H., ‘The Problem of Social Costs’ (1960) 3 Journal of Law & Economics 1–44Google Scholar
Coderch, P. S., ‘Causation and Liability’ (2000) 1 Indret 1–16.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. J., The Probable and the Provable (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977)Google Scholar
Collins, J., Hall, N. and Paul, L. A. (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals (Cambridge MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1994)Google Scholar
Corgas-Bernard, C., ‘La pluralité de responsables en droit français et dans d’autres ordres juridiques nationaux’, in GRERCA, Le droit français de la responsabilité civile confronté aux projets européens d’harmonisation (Paris: Irjs éditions, 2012), pp. 427–40Google Scholar
Cornu, G., ‘Obs. à Cass. crim., 10 juillet 1952’ (1952) II Juris-Classeur Périodique n° 7272Google Scholar
Czachórski, W., Zobowiązania (Warsaw: Lexisnexis, 2003)Google Scholar
Czachórski, W., in Radwanski, Z. (ed.), System prawa cywilnego, vol. 3, Part 1 (Warsaw: Ossolineum, 1981)Google Scholar
Dacoronia, E., ‘Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability in Greece’, in Gilead, I., Green, M. D. and Koch, B. A. (eds.), Proportional Liability: Analytical and Comparative Perspectives (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 171–82Google Scholar
Dacoronia, E., ‘Greece’, in Oliphant, K. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2012 (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 301–32Google Scholar
Dacoronia, E., ‘Greece’, in Oliphant, K. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2011 (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2012), pp. 279–305Google Scholar
Dacoronia, E., ‘Death by Suicide and Damages to Third Persons in Greece’ (2010) 18 European Review of Private Law 613–19Google Scholar
Dacoronia, E., ‘Greece’, in Hinteregger, M. (ed.), Εnvironmental Liability and Ecological Damage in European Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Dacoronia, E., ‘Greece’, in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2005 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2006), pp. 306–31Google Scholar
Dacoronia, E., ‘Greece’, in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2002 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2003), pp. 231–51Google Scholar
van Dam, C., European Tort Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013)Google Scholar
Deakin, S., Johnston, A. and Markesinis, B., Markesinis and Deakins’ Tort Law, 7th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
De Cupis, A., Il danno teoria generale della responsabilità civile, vol. I (Milan: Giuffrè, 1979)Google Scholar
De Cupis, A., Dei fatti illeciti, 2nd ed. (Bologna, Roma: Zanichelli-Il Foro Italiano, 1971)Google Scholar
Dejean de la Bâtie, N., ‘Note sous Cass. Civ. 1, 7 mars 1989 (1990) La semaine juridique II, n° 21403Google Scholar
Dejean de la Bâtie, N., ‘Responsabilité délictuelle’, in Droit civil français d’Aubry et Rau, vol. VI-2 (Paris: Librairies techniques, 1989)Google Scholar
Dejean de la Bâtie, N., ‘Note sous Cass. Civ. 2, 20 décembre 1972’ (1973) La semaine juridique II, n° 17541Google Scholar
Delgado, R., ‘Beyond Sindell: Relaxation of Cause-in-Fact for Indeterminate Plaintiffs’ (1983) 70 California Law Review 881–908Google Scholar
Deliyannis, I. and Kornilakis, P., Law of Obligations. Special Part (Eιδικό Ενοχικό Δίκαιο), III (Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 1992)Google Scholar
De Matteis, A. and Giubboni, S., Infortuni sul lavoro e malattie professionali (Milan: Giuffrè, 2005)Google Scholar
Dias Pereira, A. G., ‘Portuguese Tort Law: A Comparison with the Principles of European Tort Law’, in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2004 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2005), pp. 623–48Google Scholar
Díez-Picazo, L., Fundamentos del derecho civil patrimonial V: La responsabilidad civil extracontractual (Navarra: Civitas, 2011)Google Scholar
van Dijk, C. H., ‘Causale perikelen: het is moeilijk en zal moeilijk blijven’ (2013) 12 Tijdschrift voor Vergoeding Personenschade 61–84Google Scholar
Dijkshoorn, W., ‘De leer van de redelijke toerekening: back to the eighties’ (2011) Aansprakelijkheid, Verzekering & Schade 257–68Google Scholar
Dobbs, D. B., The Law of Torts (St. Paul MN: West, 2000)Google Scholar
Dreyer, E., ‘Causalité civile et pénale’ (2007) 40 Revue Lamy de droit civil 35–8Google Scholar
Dubuisson, B., Durant, I. C. and Schmitz, N., ‘Belgium’ in Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B. A. and Zimmerman, R. (eds.), Digest of European Tort Law, I, Essential Cases on Natural Causation (Vienna, New York: Springer 2007)Google Scholar
Dufwa, B. W., Flera skadeståndsskyldiga (Stockholm: Juristförl., 1993)Google Scholar
Dufwa, B. W., Produktansvar (Stockholm: Forsakring, 1983)Google Scholar
Dybowski, T., in Radwanski, Z. (ed.), System prawa cywilnego, vol. 3, Part 1 (Warsaw: Ossolineum, 1981)Google Scholar
Dyson, M., ‘Tort and Crime’, in Bussani, M. and Sebok, A. J. (eds.), Comparative Tort Law. Global Perspectives (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2015), pp. 93–122Google Scholar
Dyson, M., ‘Tortious Apples and Criminal Oranges’, in Id. (ed.), Comparing Tort and Crime: Learning from across and within Legal Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 416–72Google Scholar
Ebert, I., ‘Tort Law and Insurance’, in Bussani, M. and Sebok, A. J. (eds.), Comparative Tort Law. Global Perspectives (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2015), pp. 144–50Google Scholar
Edelman, J., ‘Unnecessary Causation’ (2015) 89 Australian Law Journal 20–30Google Scholar
Ehlgen, C. B., Probabilistische Proportionalhaftung und Haftung für den Verlust von Chancen (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013)Google Scholar
Ehring, D., ‘Causal Relata’, in Beebee, H., Hitchcock, C., and Menzies, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Causation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 387–413Google Scholar
Eliáš, K., Občanský zákoník: Velký akademický komentář, vol. 1, § 1–487 (Praha: Linde, 2008)Google Scholar
Elischer, D., ‘Pojetí škody, resp. újmy v aktuálních dokumentech evropského deliktního “soft law”’, Právník, č. 4/2011, str. 378–399Google Scholar
Elischer, D., ‘Náhrada nemateriálních aspektů při újmě na zdraví. Několik úvah k principu objektivizace náhrad’, Zdravotnické fórum. Pravidelná příloha časopisu Právní forum, 2011/2, 25–35Google Scholar
Elischer, D., Frinta, O. and Pauknerová, M., ‘Recodification of Private Law in the Czech Republic’, in Rivera, J. C. (ed.), The Scope and Structure of Civil Codes (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013), pp. 105–132Google Scholar
Emaus, J. M., Handhaving van EVRM-rechten via het aansprakelijkheidsrecht (diss. Utrecht) (The Hague: BJu, 2013)Google Scholar
Engel, D. M., ‘Lumping As Default in Tort Cases: The Cultural Interpretation of Injury and Causation’ (2010) 44 Loyola Los Angeles Law Review 33–68Google Scholar
Engelhard, E. F. D. and Engelhard, I. M., ‘Shockschade’, in van Boom, W. H., Giesen, I. and Verheij, A. J. (eds.), Capita civilologie handboek empirie en privaatrecht (The Hague: BJu, 2013), pp. 517–39Google Scholar
Engisch, K., Die Kausalität als Merkmal der strafrechtlichen Tatbestände (Tübingen: Mohr, 1931) (English translation available at http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=2743661)Google Scholar
Eriksson, A., Rätten till skadestånd vid miljöskador (Stockholm: Norstedts juridik, 1986)Google Scholar
Erlenkämper, A. and Fichte, W. (eds.), Sozialrecht, 6th ed. (Köln: Luchterhand, 2008)Google Scholar
Esmein, P., ‘Le nez de Cléopâtre ou les affres de la causalité’ (1964) Dalloz chr. 205–216Google Scholar
European Group on Tort Law, Principles of European Tort Law (Vienna, New York: Springer 2005)Google Scholar
von Eyben, B. and Isager, H., Lærebog i Erstatningsret, 7th ed. (Copenhagen: DJØF, 2011)Google Scholar
Fain, H., ‘Hart and Honoré on Causation in the Law’ (1966) 9 Inquiry 322–38Google Scholar
Fairgrieve, D. and G’sell-Macrez, F., ‘Causation in French Law: Pragmatism and Policy’, in Goldberg, R. (ed.), Perspectives on Causation (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2011), pp. 111–29Google Scholar
Fasching, H. W. and Konecny, A., in Kommentar zu den Zivilprozessgesetzen, III, 2nd ed. (Vienna: Manz, 2004)Google Scholar
Faure, M. and Bruggeman, V., ‘Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability’, in Tichý, L. (ed.), Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Karlowa, 2007), pp. 105–22Google Scholar
Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L. and Sarat, A., ‘The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming…’ (1980–81) 15 Law & Society Review 631–54Google Scholar
Ferey, S. and G’sell-Macrez, F. (eds.), Causalité, responsabilité et contribution à la dette (Brussels: Bruylant, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Fernandes Cadilha, C. A., Regime da responsabilidade civil extracontratual do Estado e demais entidades públicas anotado, 2nd ed. (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2011)Google Scholar
Filios, P., Law of Obligations. General Part (Ενοχικό Δίκαιο. Γενικό μέρος), 6th ed. (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 2011)Google Scholar
Fischer, D. A., ‘Insufficient Causes’ (2005–2006) 94 Kentucky Law Journal 276–317Google Scholar
Fischer, D. A., ‘Causation in Fact in Omission Cases’ (1992) Utah Law Review 1335–84Google Scholar
Fleischer, H., ‘Schadensersatz für verlorene Chancen im Vertrags- und Deliktsrecht’, (1999) Juristenzeitung 766–75Google Scholar
Fleming, J. G., The American Tort Process (Oxford: Clarendon, 1988)Google Scholar
Forchielli, P., Il rapporto di causalità nell’illecito civile (Padua: Cedam, 1960)Google Scholar
Foot, P., ‘Hart and Honoré: Causation in the Law’ (1963) 72 Philosophical Review 505–15Google Scholar
Forray, V., ‘Commentaire complémentaire de l’article L. 650–1 du Code de commerce’ (2008) Revue trimestrielle de droit commercial 661–75Google Scholar
Fountedaki, K., Human Reproduction and Civil Medical Liability (Ανθρώπινη αναπαραγωγή και αστική ιατρική ευθύνη) (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 2007)Google Scholar
Fountedaki, K., ‘Issues of Civil Medical Liability in Case of Birth of a Person with Serious Illness or Disability (Wrongful Life)’ (‘Θέματα αστικής ιατρικής ευθύνης σε περίπτωση γέννησης ατόμου με σοβαρή ασθένεια ή αναπηρία (wrongful life)’) (2004) Digesta 471–83Google Scholar
Fountedaki, K., Civil Medical Liability (Aστική ιατρική ευθύνη) (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 2003)Google Scholar
Fountedaki, K., ‘Civil Medical Liability after the L. 2251/1994’ (‘Η αστική ιατρική ευθύνη μετά το ν. 2251/1994’) (1996) Kritiki Epitheorissi 179–204Google Scholar
Fountedaki, K., ‘The Issue of Causation in Medical Liability’ (‘Το πρόβλημα του αιτιώδους συνδέσμου στην ιατρική ευθύνη’) (1994) 35 Elliniki Dikaiosini 1226–39Google Scholar
Fourkiotis, K., Law of Obligations. General Part (Ελληνικόν Ενοχικόν Δίκαιον. Γενικόν μέρος) (Athens: Papazisis, 1964)Google Scholar
Fragoudaki, E., The Legal Treatment of Applications of Biogenetics – especially in Private Law Sector (Η νομική μεταχείριση των εφαρμογών της βιογενετικής - ιδίως από πλευράς ιδιωτικού δικαίου) (Athens, Komotini: Ant. N. Sakkoulas, 2008)Google Scholar
Fraley, J. M., ‘Re-examining Acts of God’ (2010) 27 Pace Environmental Law Review 669–90Google Scholar
Franzoni, M., Il danno risarcibile (Milan: Giuffrè, 2004)Google Scholar
Friberg, S. and Sunnqvist, M., ‘Crime and Tort in Sweden: Theoretical Distinction, Practical Connection’, in Dyson, M. (ed.), Comparing Tort and Crime. Learning from across and within Legal Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 173–222Google Scholar
Fulham-McQuillan, S., ‘Judicial Belief in Statistics as Fact: Loss of Chance in Ireland and England’ (2014) 30 Professional Negligence 9–31Google Scholar
Fumerton, R., ‘Moore, Causation, Counterfactuals, and Responsibility’ (2003) 40 San Diego Law Review 1273–81Google Scholar
Fumerton, R. and Kress, K., ‘Causation and the Law: Preemption, Lawful Sufficiency, and Causal Sufficiency’ (2001) 64 Law and Contemporary Problems 83–105Google Scholar
Gabartas, H. and Šaltinytė, L., ‘Lithuania’, in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2010 (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2011), pp. 353–83Google Scholar
Gaeta, S., ‘Sul momento cui va riferita la valutazione del danno da risarcire’ (1945) I, 2 Giurisprudenza italiana 105–8Google Scholar
Galanter, M., ‘The Dialectic of Injury and Remedy’ (2010) 44 Loyola Los Angeles Law Review 1–10Google Scholar
Galanter, M., ‘Real World Torts: An Antidote to Anecdote’ (1996) 55 Maryland Law Review 1093–160Google Scholar
Galvão Telles, I., Direito das obrigações, 7th ed. (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 1997)Google Scholar
Garde, J., Nørgaard, C. A. and Revsbech, K., Forvaltningsret. Almindelige Emner, 5th ed. (Copenhagen: DJØF, 2009)Google Scholar
Garlicki, S., Odpowiedzialność cywilna za nieszczęśliwe wypadki (Warsaw: Wydawn. Prawnicze, 1971)Google Scholar
Garlicki, S., ‘Glosa do orz. SN 17.04.1967, II PR 162/67’ (1968) 4 Nowe Prawo 664–71Google Scholar
Gass, M., Haftung für Rating-Agenturen (Vienna: Verlag Österreich, 2014)Google Scholar
Gebauer, M., Hypothetische Kausalität und Haftungsgrund (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007)Google Scholar
Georgiades, Ap., Law of Obligations. General Part (Ενοχικό Δίκαιο. Γενικό μέρος), 2nd ed. (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 2015)Google Scholar
Georgiades, Ap., Issues of Civil Liability (Zητήματα αστικής ευθύνης) (Athens: Ant. N. Sakkoulas, 1972)Google Scholar
Georgiades, Ap. and Stathopoulos, M. (eds.), Civil Code (Αστικός Κώδικας), IV (Athens: P. N. Sakkoulas, 1982)Google Scholar
Georgiades, Ap. and Stathopoulos, M. (eds.), Civil Code (Αστικός Κώδικας), II (Athens: P. N. Sakkoulas, 1979)Google Scholar
Georgiades, Ast., Law of Obligations. General Part (Ενοχικό Δίκαιο. Γενικό μέρος), 4th ed. (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 2003)Google Scholar
van Gerven, W., Larouche, P. and Lever, J., Tort Law (Oxford: Hart, 2000)Google Scholar
van Gerven, W., Lever, J., Larouche, Pierre, von Bar, C. and Viney, G., Tort Law. Scope of Protection (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 1998)Google Scholar
Ghinoy, P., ‘Malattie professionali: criteri di accertamento e nozione di manifestazione’ (1997) II Giustizia civile 117–23Google Scholar
Giesen, I., ‘(Dis)Proportionele duidelijkheid’, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Burgerlijk Recht 2011, no. 19, 149–50Google Scholar
Giesen, I., ‘De aantrekkingskracht van Loreley. Over opkomst en ondergang (?) van de “omkeringsregel”’, in Hartlief, T. and Lindenbergh, S. D. (eds.), Tien pennenstreken over personenschade (The Hague: Sdu, 2009), pp. 69–86Google Scholar
Giesen, I., ‘The Burden of Proof and Other Procedural Devices in Tort Law’, in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2008 (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2009), pp. 49–67Google Scholar
Giesen, I. and Keirse, A. L. M., ‘The Netherlands’, in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2010 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2011), pp. 426–60Google Scholar
Gilead, I., Green, M. and Koch, B., ‘General Report’, in Gilead, I., Green, M. and Koch, B. (eds.), Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability. Analytical and Comparative Perspectives (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 1–73Google Scholar
Gimpel-Hinteregger, M., Theoretische Grundfragen der Umwelthaftung (Vienna: Manz, 1994)Google Scholar
Giometti, L., ‘La nozione di esposizione ad amianto; benefici contributivi e regime assicurativo: un sistema integrato di norme’ (2002) I Giurisprudenza italiana 522–6Google Scholar
Glaser, J., Abhandlungen aus dem österreichischen Strafrecht, I (Vienna: Tendler & Comp.: 1858)Google Scholar
Goldberg, J. C. P. and Zipursky, B. C., ‘Intervening Wrongdoing in Tort: The Restatement (Third)’s Unfortunate Embrace of Negligent Enabling’ (2009) 44 Wake Forest Law Review 1211–46Google Scholar
Goldberg, J. C. P., Sebok, A. J. and Zipursky, B. C. Tort Law. Responsibilities and Redress, 4th ed. (New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2016)Google Scholar
Goldberg, R. (ed.), Perspectives on Causation (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2011)Google Scholar
Goldberg, R., Causation and Risk in the Law of Torts: Scientific Evidence and Medicinal Product Liability (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 1999)Google Scholar
Golding, M. P., ‘Causation in the Law’ (1962) 59 Journal of Philosophy 85–95Google Scholar
Goleminov, C., Tort Liability (Отговорност за непозволено увреждане) (Sofia: Tilia, 1999)Google Scholar
Goleva, P., Law of Obligations (Облигационно право) (Sofia: Feneya, 2012)Google Scholar
Goleva, P., Civil and administrative liability in healthcare (Гражданска и административна отговорност в здравеопазването) (Sofia: IK Trud I Pravo, 2012)Google Scholar
Goleva, P., Tort Law (Деликтно право) (Sofia: Feneya, 2011)Google Scholar
Gomard, B., ‘Offentlige myndigheders erstatningsansvar’ (2004) Ugeskrift for Retsvæsen B.383Google Scholar
Gomes, J., ‘Ainda sobre a figura do dano da perda de oportunidade ou perda de chance’ (2012) Cadernos de direito privado, special edition, II Seminário dos Cadernos de Direito Privado. Responsabilidade civil 17–29Google Scholar
Gomes, J., ‘Em torno do dano da perda de chance — algumas reflexões’, in Dias, J. Figueiredo, Canotilho, J. J. Gomes and Costa, J. Faria (eds.), Ars judicandi. Estudos em homenagem ao Prof. Doutor António Castanheira Neves, II, Direito privado (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2008), pp. 289–327Google Scholar
Gomes, J., A gestão de negócios. Um instituto jurídico numa encruzilhada (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 1993)Google Scholar
Gonçalves Moniz, A. R., ‘Responsabilidade da Administração por prestação de cuidados de saúde e violação do dever de vigilância’ (2015) Cadernos de justiça administrativa 37–52Google Scholar
Gorla, G., ‘Civilian Judicial Decisions – An Historical Account of Italian Style’ (1970) 44 Tulane Law Review 740–9Google Scholar
Gout, O., ‘Note sous Cass. 1ere civ., 17 juin 2010, n 09–67.011’ (2010) La semaine juridique n° 36, 870–1Google Scholar
Grady, M. F., ‘Causation and Foreseeability’, in Arlen, J. H. (ed.), Research Handbook on the Economic Analysis of Torts (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2013), pp. 114–48Google Scholar
Graziadei, M., ‘Liability for Fault in Italian law: The Development of Legal Doctrine from 1865 to the End of the Twentieth Century’, in Jansen, N. (ed.), The Development and Making of Legal Doctrine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010), pp. 126–63Google Scholar
Greco, P., ‘Debito pecuniario, debito di valore e svalutazione monetaria’ (1947) II Rivista di diritto commerciale 103–17Google Scholar
Green, L., ‘The Causal Relation Issue in Negligence Law’ (1962) 60 Michigan Law Review 543–76Google Scholar
Green, L., ‘Are There Dependable Rules of Causation?’ (1929) 77 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 601–28Google Scholar
Green, L., Rationale for Proximate Cause (Kansas City: Vernon Law Book, 1927)Google Scholar
Green, M. D., ‘Second Thoughts about Apportionment in Asbestos Litigation’ (2008) 37 Southwestern University Law Review 531–52Google Scholar
Green, M. D., ‘A Future for Asbestos Apportionment?’ (2006) 12 Connecticut Insurance Law Journal 315–47Google Scholar
Green, S., Causation in Negligence (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2015)Google Scholar
Griss, I., Kathrein, G. and Koziol, H. (eds.), Entwurf eines neuen österreichischen Schadenersatzrechts (Vienna: Springer, 2006)Google Scholar
Grönwall, L., Hessmark, L.-G. and Jansson, H., Arbetsskadeförsäkring och statligt personskadeskydd (Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2013)Google Scholar
Grosse-Wilde, T., ‘Die Relata eines juristischen Kausalbegriffs und der juristische Syllogismus’, in Bäcker, C. and Ziemann, S. (eds.), Junge Rechtsphilosophie, (2012) 135 Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Beiheft pp. 43–54Google Scholar
G’sell, F., ‘Causation, Counterfactuals, and Probabilities in Philosophy and Legal Thinking’ (2016) 91 Chicago-Kent Law Review 503–25Google Scholar
G’sell-Macrez, F., ‘La preuve du lien de causalité: comparaisons franco-américaines à propos des arrêts Distilbène’ (2010) 29 October Les Petites Affiches 6–17Google Scholar
G’sell-Macrez, F., Recherches sur la notion de causalité (Villeneuve d’Ascq: L’ARNT, 2005)Google Scholar
Haack, S., Evidence Matters: Science, Proof, and Truth in the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Hager, G., ‘Umweltschäden – ein Prüfstein für die Wandlungs- und Leistungsfähigkeit des Deliktsrechts’ [1986] Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1961–71Google Scholar
Halling-Overgaard, S., Revisors erstatnings- og disciplinæransvar, 4th ed. (Copenhagen: DJØF 2014)Google Scholar
Hamer, D., ‘“Factual Causation” and “Scope of Liability”: What’s the Difference?’ (2014) 77 Modern Law Review 155–88Google Scholar
Harrer, F., ‘Zufall und Wahrscheinlichkeit im Haftungsrecht’, Zeitschrift für Verkehrsrecht 2012, 440–445Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. and Honoré, T., Causation in the Law, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. and Honoré, T., Causation in the Law (Oxford: Clarendon, 1959)Google Scholar
Hartkamp, A. S. ‘Chapter 8. Law of Obligations’, in Chorus, J., Gerver, P. H. and Hondius, E. (eds.), Introduction to Dutch Law, 4th ed. (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer, 2006)Google Scholar
Hartkamp, A. S. and Sieburgh, C. H., Mr. C. Assers Handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlands burgerlijk recht. 6. Verbintenissenrecht, II, De verbintenis in het algemeen (Deventer: Kluwer, 2013)Google Scholar
Hartkamp, A. S. and Sieburgh, C. H., Mr. C. Assers Handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlands burgerlijk recht. 6. Verbintenissenrecht, I, De verbintenis in het algemeen (Deventer: Kluwer, 2012)Google Scholar
Hanson, J. D. and McCann, M., ‘Situationist Torts’ (2008) 41 Loyola Law Review 1345–454Google Scholar
Hanson, J. D. and Yosifon, D., ‘The Situation: An Introduction to the Situational Character, Critical Realism, Power Economics and Deep Capture’ (2003) 152 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 129–346Google Scholar
Häusler, M.-S., Haftung ohne Kausalitätsnachweis (Vienna: Facultas, 2013)Google Scholar
Havel, B., ‘The Czech Republic’, in Smits, J. M. (ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, 2nd ed. (Cheltenham: Elgar 2012) pp. 279–85Google Scholar
Hebly, M., ‘Suïcide na een arbeidsongeval: een (on)geval apart?’, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Burgerlijk Recht 2010, no. 32, 258–63Google Scholar
Heerma van Voss, G. J. J., Mr. C. Assers Handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlands Burgerlijk Recht. 7. Bijzondere overeenkomsten, V, Arbeidsovereenkomst, collectievearbeidsovereenkomst en ondernemingsovereenkomst (Deventer: Kluwer, 2008)Google Scholar
Heinrich, E., ‘Teilhaftung bei alternativer Kausalität mit Zufall’ (2011) Juristische Blätter 277–87Google Scholar
Hellner, J., ‘The Swedish Alternative in an International Perspective’, in Oldertz, C. and Tidefelt, E. (eds.), Compensation for Personal Injury in Sweden and Other Countries (Stockholm: Juristförl., 1988), pp. 17–39Google Scholar
Hellner, J. and Radetzki, M., Skadeståndsrätt, 9th ed. (Stockholm: Norstedts juridik, 2014)Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. and Oppenheim, P., ‘Studies in the Logic of Explanation’ (1948) 15 Philosophy of Science 135–75Google Scholar
Hertz, K., ‘Erstatningsansvar for psykiske skader’ (2004) Ugeskrift for Retsvæsen B.183Google Scholar
Hill, A. B., ‘The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?’ (1965) 58 Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 295–300Google Scholar
Hodgson, D., The Law of Intervening Causation (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008)Google Scholar
Hoffmann, L., ‘Causation’ (2005) 121 Law Quarterly Review 592–603Google Scholar
Holčapek, T., Dokazování v medicínskoprávních sporech (Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2011)Google Scholar
Hondius, E., ‘Professional Liability’, in Bussani, M. and Sebok, A. J. (eds.), Comparative Tort Law. Global Perspectives (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2015), pp. 226–49Google Scholar
Honoré, T., ‘Causation in the Law’, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2010 ed.), available at plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/causation-lawGoogle Scholar
Honoré, T., ‘Necessary and Sufficient Conditions in Tort Law’, in Owen, D. G. (ed.), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), pp. 363–85Google Scholar
Honoré, A. M. (T.), Causation and Remoteness, in International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, vol. XI, ch. 7 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1971)Google Scholar
Honoré, T., ‘Die Kausalitätslehre im anglo-amerikanischen Recht im Vergleich zum deutschen Recht’ (1957) 69 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 463–74Google Scholar
Hume, D., An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (London, 1748)Google Scholar
Hume, D., A Treatise of Human Nature (London, 1739–1740)Google Scholar
Hylton, K. N., ‘Causation in Tort Law: A Reconsideration’, in Arlen, J. H. (ed.), Research Handbook on the Economic Analysis of Torts (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2013), pp. 97–113Google Scholar
Ibbetson, D., ‘The Tort of Negligence in the Common Law in the Nineneteenth and Twentieth Centuries’, in Schrage, E. J. H. (ed.), Negligence: The Comparative Legal History of the Law of Torts (Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 2001), pp. 229–71Google Scholar
Infantino, M., ‘Diffusing Tort Law Softly: Insights into the European Travels of Italian Tort Law’ (2015) 6 Journal of European Tort Law 1–22Google Scholar
Infantino, M., ‘Causation Theories and Causation Rules’, in Bussani, M. and Sebok, A. J. (eds.), Comparative Tort Law. Global Perspectives (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2015), pp. 279–99Google Scholar
Infantino, M., La causalità nella responsabilità extracontrattuale (Bern: Stämpli, 2012)Google Scholar
Infantino, M., ‘Making European Tort Law: The Game and Its Players’ (2010) 20 Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law 45–87Google Scholar
Iossiffov, B. and Balabanov, B., Delictual Liability (Непозволено увреждане) (Sofia: IM Clement University, 1989)Google Scholar
Issacharoff, S., ‘Can There Be a Behavioral Law and Economics’, (1998) 51 Vanderbilt Law Review 1729–45Google Scholar
Jaakke, J. C., ‘Strengere regels voor ratingbureaus. Een vereenvoudiging van de aansprakelijkheidstelling onder Nederlands recht?’, Ars Aequi 2014, 190–3Google Scholar
Jaakke, J. C., ‘De regulering van en toezicht op ratingbureaus in de Europese Unie’ (2012) 20 Onderneming en Financiering 43–55Google Scholar
Jansen, N., Die Struktur des Haftungsrechts (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2003)Google Scholar
Jansen, N., ‘The Idea of a Lost Chance’ (1999) 19 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 271–96Google Scholar
Jestaz, P., ‘Une question d’épistémologie’ (2001) Revue trimestrielle de droit civil 547–58Google Scholar
Jolls, C., Sunstein, C. R. and Thaler, R., ‘A Behavioural Approach to Law and Economics’, (1998) 50 Stanford Law Review 1471–1550Google Scholar
Josephson, A. (ed.), Patientskadenämndens referatsamling. Avgöranden enligt patientskadelagen 1998–2009 (available at: www.eddy.se, 2010)Google Scholar
Jourdain, P., Les principes de la responsabilité civile, 8th ed. (Paris: Dalloz, 2010)Google Scholar
Jurkevičius, V., Kadner Graziano, T. and Selelionytė-Drukteinienė, S., ‘The Impact of the Comparative Method on Lithuanian Private Law’, (2013) 21 European Review of Private Law 959–90Google Scholar
Kadner Graziano, T., ‘The “Loss of a Chance” in European Private Law. “All or Nothing” or Partial Compensation in Cases of Uncertainty of Causation’, in Tichý, L. (ed.), Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Karlowa, 2007), pp. 123–48Google Scholar
Kahmen, B. and Stepanians, M., Critical Essays on ‘Causation and Responsibility’ (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013)Google Scholar
Kalaidjiev, A., Law of Obligations, General Part (Облигационно право, Обща част) (Sofia: Sibi, 2001) – 6th ed. 2013Google Scholar
Kaliński, M., Odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza, in Olejniczak, A. (ed.), System prawa prywatnego. Prawo zobowiązań – część ogólna, vol. 6 (Warsaw: C. H. Beck, 2009), pp. 1–214Google Scholar
Kaliński, M., Szkoda na mieniu i jej naprawienie (Warsaw: C. H. Beck, 2008)Google Scholar
Kaliński, M., ‘O normalności powiązań kauzalnych’ (2007) 11–12 Przegląd Sądowy 25–9Google Scholar
Kanellopoulou-Bottis, M., ‘The Infringement of Probability as Damage to Patrimony or Moral Harm’ (‘Η προσβολή της πιθανότητας ως περιουσιακή ζημία ή ως ηθική βλάβη’) (2003) Kritiki Epitheorissi 253–307Google Scholar
Kaplow, L. and Shavell, S., ‘Accuracy in the Assessment of Damages’ (1996) 39 Journal of Law and Economics 191–209Google Scholar
Karakostas, I., Law of Torts (Το δίκαιο των αδικοπραξιών) (Athens: Nomiki Bibliothiki, 2014)Google Scholar
Karakostas, I., Environment and Law (Περιβάλλον και δίκαιο) (Athens, Komotini: Ant. N. Sakkoulas, 2000)Google Scholar
Karasis, M., Joint and Several Debt, I, The Notion (Οφειλή εις ολόκληρον, Ι, Η έννοια), 2nd ed. (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 1990)Google Scholar
Karczewski, C., Die Haftung für Schockschäden (Frankfurt a.M. et al.: Lang, 1992)Google Scholar
Karner, E., ‘Haftung für Rat und Auskunft zwischen Vertrag und Delikt’, in Festschrift Koziol (Vienna: Sramek Verlag, 2010), pp. 695–720Google Scholar
Karner, E., ‘Zur Haftung von Rating-Agenturen’ (2010) Österreichisches Bank-Archiv 587–96Google Scholar
Karner, E., ‘Unerwünschte Zeugung und ungeplante Geburt – (k)eine Rechtsprechungsdivergenz?’ (2009) Zeitschrift für Ehe und Familie 91–4Google Scholar
Karner, E., Der Ersatz ideeller Schäden bei Körperverletzung (Vienna, New York: Springer, 1999)Google Scholar
Karner, E. ‘Rechtsprechungswende bei Schock- und Fernwirkungsschäden Dritter?’ (1998) Zeitschrift für Verkehrsrecht 182–9Google Scholar
Karner, E. and Kernbichler, F., ‘Austria’, in Oliphant, K. and Wagner, G. (eds.), Employers’ Liability and Workers’ Compensation (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2012), pp. 63–110Google Scholar
Karner, E. and Koziol, H., Der Ersatz ideellen Schadens im österreichischen Recht und seine Reform, 15. Österreichischer Juristentag vol. II/1 (Vienna: Manz, 2003)Google Scholar
Karner, E. and Riss, O., ‘Aggregation and Divisibility of Damage in Austria: Tort Law’, in Oliphant, K. (ed.), Aggregation and Divisibility of Damage (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2009), pp. 13–49Google Scholar
Karollus, M., Funktion und Dogmatik der Haftung aus Schutzgesetzverletzung (Vienna: Springer, 1992)Google Scholar
Kasche, M., Verlust von Heilungschancen: eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung (Frankfurt a.M. et al.: Lang, 1999)Google Scholar
Kaye, D., ‘The Limits of the Preponderance of the Evidence Standard: Justifiably Naked Statistical Evidence and Multiple Causation’ (1982) American Bar Foundation Research Journal 487–516Google Scholar
Keeton, W. P., Dobbs, D. B., Keeton, R. E. and Owen, D. G., Prosser and Keeton on Torts, 5th ed., (St. Paul MN: West, 1984)Google Scholar
Keil, G., ‘Making Causal Counterfactuals More Singular, and More Appropriate for Use in the Law’, in Kahmen, B. and Stepanians, M. (eds.), Critical Essays on ‘Causation and Responsibility’ (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 157–89Google Scholar
Keirse, A. L. M., ‘The Tortfeasor Takes his Victim as He Finds Him’, in Hartlief, T. and Lindenbergh, S. D. (eds.), Tien pennenstreken over personenschade (The Hague: Sdu Uitgevers, 2009), pp. 107–25Google Scholar
Keirse, A. L. M., 'Schadebeperkingsplicht: over eigen schuld aan omvang van de schade’ (diss. Groningen) (Deventer: Kluwer, 2003)Google Scholar
Keirse, A. L. M. and Schaub, M., ‘Dutch Case Note: Employer’s Liability for an Injured Employee’s Suicide in Dutch law’ (2010) 18 European Review of Private Law 631–47Google Scholar
Kelman, M., ‘The Necessary Myth of Objective Causation Judgments in Liberal Political Theory’ (1987) 63 Chicago-Kent Law Review 579–637Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan, ‘Three Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought: 1850–2000’, in Trubek, D. M. and Santos, A. (eds.), The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 19–73Google Scholar
Keren-Paz, T., Sex Trafficking: A Private Law Response (Abingdon: Routledge 2013)Google Scholar
Khoury, L., Uncertain Causation in Medical Liability (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2006)Google Scholar
Kitsaras, L., ‘Wrongful Birth: A Claim of the Parents against the Doctor for Monetary Compensation because of the Loss of the “Chance” of Interruption of the Pregnancy?’ (‘Wrongful birth: Αξίωση των γονέων έναντι του ιατρού για χρηματική ικανοποίηση λόγω απώλειας της «ευκαιρίας» διακοπής της κύησης;’) (2011) IA Chronika Idiotikou Dikaiou 166–73Google Scholar
Klaassen, C. J. M., Schadevergoeding: algemeen, II (Mon. BW B35) (Deventer: Kluwer, 2007)Google Scholar
Kleineman, J., Ren förmögenhetsskada. Särskilt vid vilseledandeavannanänkontraktspart (Stockholm: Juristförlaget, 1987)Google Scholar
Kleinschmidt, J., ‘Causation’, in Basedow, J., Hopt, K.J., Zimmermann, R. and Stier, A. (eds.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of European Private Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 159–160Google Scholar
Kletečka, A. ‘Alternative Verursachungskonkurrenz mit dem Zufall’ (2009) Juristische Blätter 137–43Google Scholar
Kletečka, A. and Schauer, M., ABGB-ON1.02 (Vienna: Manz, 2016)Google Scholar
Klicka, T., Beweislastverteilung im Zivilverfahrensrecht (Vienna: Manz, 1995)Google Scholar
Koch, A., Zwiazek przyczynowy jako podstawa odpowiedzialności odszkodowawczej w prawie cywilnym (Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawn. Naukowe, 1975)Google Scholar
Koch, B. A., ‘Proportional Liability for Causal Uncertainty: How It Works on the Basis of a 200-Year-Old Code’, in Martín-Casals, M. and Papayannis, D. M. (eds.), Uncertain Causation in Tort Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 67–86Google Scholar
Koch, B. A., ‘Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability in Austria’, in Gilead, I., Green, M. D. and Koch, B. A. (eds.), Proportional Liability: Analytical and Comparative Perspectives (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 77–97Google Scholar
Koch, B. A., ‘Principles of European Tort Law’ (2009) 20 King’s Law Journal 203–14Google Scholar
Koch, B. A., ‘Austria’, in Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B. A. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), Digest of European Tort Law, I, Essential Cases on Natural Causation (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2007)Google Scholar
Koch, B. A., ‘Wilburg’s “Flexible System” in a Nutshell’, in Koziol, H. and Steninger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2001 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2002), pp. 545–8Google Scholar
Koch, B. A. and Koziol, H., ‘Comparative Conclusions’, in Koch, B. A. and Koziol, H. (eds.), Unification of Tort Law: Strict Liability (The Hague: Kluwer, 2002), pp. 395–435Google Scholar
Koch, B. A. and Schwarzenegger, P., ‘Multiple Tortfeasors under Austrian Law’, in Rogers, W. V. H. and van Boom, W. H. (eds.), Unification of Tort Law: Multiple Tortfeasors (The Hague, Kluwer, 2004), pp. 9–27Google Scholar
Konov, T., The Basis of Civil Liability (Основание на гражданската отговорност) (Sofia: IM Clement University, 1995)Google Scholar
Kontogianni, A., Contributory Negligence in Civil Law (Η συνυπευθυνότητα του ζημιωθέντος στο Αστικό Δίκαιο) (Athens, Komotini: Ant. N. Sakkoulas, 2006)Google Scholar
Kornilakis, P., Law of Obligations. Special Part, I (Ειδικό Ενοχικό Δίκαιο), 2nd ed. (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 2012)Google Scholar
Korobkin, R. B. and Ulen, T. S., ‘Law and Behavioural Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics’ (2000) 88 California Law Review 1075–144Google Scholar
Korzonek, J. and Rosenbluth, I., Kodeks zobowiązań, Komentarz (Kraków: Księgarnia Powszechna, 1934–35)Google Scholar
Kötz, H. and Wagner, G., Deliktsrecht, 11th ed. (Munich: Verlag Franz Vahlen, 2010)Google Scholar
Kounougeri-Manoledaki, E., ‘The Problem of Hypothetical Causation in the Law of Compensation’ (‘Το πρόβλημα της υποθετικής αιτιότητας στο δίκαιο της αποζημίωσης’) (1981) Scientific Annual of Armenopoulos 185–202Google Scholar
Kozhuharov, A., Contract Law. Theory of Contractual Terms (Облигационно право, Общо учение за облигационното отношение) (Sofia: Nauka I Izkustvo, 1958)Google Scholar
Koziol, H., Österreichisches Haftpflichtrecht II, 3rd ed. (Vienna: Manz, 2014)Google Scholar
Koziol, H., Basic Questions of Tort Law from a Germanic Perspective (Vienna: Sramek Verlag, 2012); English Version of H. Koziol, Grundfragen des Schadenersatzrechts (Vienna: Sramek Verlag, 2010)Google Scholar
Koziol, H., ‘Gedanken zur österreichischen Schadenersatzreform’, in Justiz, Bundesministerium für (ed.), 200 Jahre ABGB (Vienna: Manz, 2011), p. 307–33Google Scholar
Koziol, H., Grundfragen des Schadenersatzrechts (Vienna: Sramek Verlag, 2010)Google Scholar
Koziol, H., ‘Natural and Legal Causation’, in Tichý, L. (ed.), Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Karlowa, 2007), pp. 53–67Google Scholar
Koziol, H., ‘Comparative Report’, in Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B. A. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), Digest of European Tort Law, I, Essential Cases on Natural Causation (Vienna, New York: Springer: 2007), pp. 589–92Google Scholar
Koziol, H., ‘Schadenersatz für den Verlust einer Chance?’ in Hohloch, G. and Frank, R., Schlechtriem, P. (eds.), Festschrift für Stoll (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001), pp. 233–50Google Scholar
Koziol, H., ‘Damages under Austrian Law’, in Magnus, U. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Damages (The Hague: Kluwer, 2001), pp. 7–26Google Scholar
Koziol, H., ‘Causation under Austrian Law’, in Spier, J. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Causation (The Hague: Kluwer, 2000), pp. 11–21Google Scholar
Koziol, H., ‘Der Beweis des natürlichen Kausalzusammenhangs’, in Koller, A. (ed.), Haftpflicht- und Versicherungsrechtstagung 1999 (St. Gallen: Verlag Institut für Versicherungswirtschaft der Universität St. Gallen, 1999), pp. 79–103Google Scholar
Koziol, H., ‘Problems of Alternative Causation in Tort Law’, in Hausmaninger, H., Koziol, H., Rabello, A. M. and Gilead, I. (eds.), Developments in Austrian and Israeli Private Law (Vienna: Springer, 1999), pp. 177–86Google Scholar
Koziol, H., ‘Rechtmäßiges Alternativverhalten – Auflockerung starrer Lösungsansätze’, in Festschrift Deutsch (Köln: C. Heymanns, 1999), pp. 179–87Google Scholar
Koziol, H., ‘Wrongfulness under Austrian Law’, in Koziol, (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Wrongfulness (The Hague: Kluwer, 1998), pp. 11–30Google Scholar
Koziol, H., Österreichisches Haftpflichtrecht I, 3rd ed. (Vienna: Manz, 1997)Google Scholar
Koziol, H., ‘Delikt, Verletzung von Schuldverhältnissen und Zwischenbereich’ (1994) Juristische Blätter 209–23Google Scholar
Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2008 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2009)Google Scholar
Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2007 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2008)Google Scholar
Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2006 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2008)Google Scholar
Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C., ‘Schadenersatz bei ungeplanter Geburt eines Kindes’ (2008) Österreichische Richterzeitung 138–48Google Scholar
Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2005 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2006)Google Scholar
Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2003 (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2004)Google Scholar
Koziol, H., Bydlinski, P. and Bollenberger, R. (eds.), Kurzkommentar zum ABGB (KBB), 5th ed. (Vienna, Springer, 2017)Google Scholar
Kramer, E., ‘Der Einfluß des BGB auf das schweizerische und österreichische Privatrecht’ (2000) 200 Archiv für die civilistische Praxis 365–400Google Scholar
Krejci, H. and Böhler, E., ‘Schadenersatzrecht’, in Tomandl, T. (ed.), System des österreichischen Sozialversicherungsrechts (Vienna: Manz, 2017, loose leaf collection)Google Scholar
von Kries, J. A., ‘Über den Begriff der objektiven Möglichkeit und einige Anwendungen desselben’ Vierteljahresschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie (1888) 12(2–4) 179–240, 287–323, 393–428Google Scholar
Lackoroński, B., ‘Orzecznictwo dotyczące odpowiedzialności za tzw. szkody pośrednie’ (2007) 9 Przegląd Sądowy 35–48Google Scholar
Lambert-Faivre, Y., ‘De la poursuite à la contribution: quelques arcanes de la causalité’ (1992) Dalloz chronique 311Google Scholar
Lamour, M.-P., ‘Des cas où l’on répare les dommages que l’on n’a pas causés’ (2002) Revue de la Recherche Juridique 1237–67Google Scholar
Landes, W. M. and Posner, R. A., The Economic Structure of Tort Law (Cambridge Mass., London: Harvard University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Landes, W. M. and Posner, R. A., ‘Causation in Tort Law: An Economic Approach’ (1983) 12 Journal of Legal Studies 109–34Google Scholar
Lange, H. and Schiemann, G., Schadensersatz, 3rd ed. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003)Google Scholar
Lapoyade Deschamps, C., ‘La réparation du préjudice économique pur en droit français’ (1998) 50 Revue internationale de droit comparé 367–81Google Scholar
Larenz, K. and Canaris, C.-W., Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts, II/2, 13th ed. (Munich: Beck, 1994)Google Scholar
Leite de Campos, D., ‘Da responsabilidade do credor na fase de incumprimento’ (1992) 52 Revista da Ordem dos Advogados 1–16Google Scholar
Leite de Campos, D., ‘A responsabilidade do banqueiro pela concessão ou não concessão de crédito’ (1986) 46 Revista da Ordem dos Advogados 49–55Google Scholar
Le Tourneau, P. (ed.), Droit de la responsabilité et des contrats (Paris: Dalloz Action, 2010)Google Scholar
Le Tourneau, P., Responsabilité civile professionnelle, 2nd ed. (Paris: Dalloz, 2005)Google Scholar
Lewaszkiewicz-Petrykowska, B., Wyrządzenie szkody przez kilka osób (Warsaw: Wydaw. Prawnicze, 1978)Google Scholar
Lewis, D., ‘Causation as Influence’, in Collins, J., Hall, N. and Paul, L. A. (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals (Cambridge Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1994), pp. 75–106Google Scholar
Lewis, D., ‘Causation’ (1973) 70 Journal of Philosophy 556–67Google Scholar
Lewis, R., ‘Insurance and the Tort System’ (2005) 25 Legal Studies 85–116Google Scholar
Lindenbergh, S. D., Arbeidsongevallen en beroepsziekten (Mon. Privaatrecht 13) (Deventer: Kluwer, 2009)Google Scholar
Lindenbergh, S. D. and Pape, S. B., ‘Proportionele aansprakelijkheid bij onzeker causaal verband: deel 2’ (2011) Ars Aequi 720–5Google Scholar
Litzeropoulos, A., Elements of the Law of Obligations (Στοιχεία Ενοχικού Δικαίου) (Athens 1968; reprinted: Athens, Komotini: Ant. N. Sakkoulas, 2002)Google Scholar
Lixouriotis, I., ‘Note II under AP 106/2003’ (‘ΑΠ 106/2003, σημ. II’) (2004) Dikaio Epiheiriseon kai Etairion 950Google Scholar
Lohsse, S., ‘The Development of Traffic Liability in Germany’, in Ernst, W. (ed.), The Development of Traffic Liability (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010), pp. 75–111Google Scholar
López y García de la Serrana, J. and Sánchez Ruiz de la Valdivia, I. (eds.). Cuestiones actuales sobre responsabilidad civil (Navarra: Thomson-Aranzadi, 2013)Google Scholar
Lunney, M. and Oliphant, K., Tort Law, 5th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
MacDonald, R. A., ‘Access to Civil Justice’, in Cane, P. and Kritzer, H. M. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 492–521Google Scholar
Machnikowski, P., in Radwański, Z. (ed.), System prawa prywatnego, vol. 6 (Warsaw: C. H. Beck, 2009)Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L., The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation, corrected ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980)Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L., ‘Causes and Conditions’ (1965) 2 American Philosophical Quarterly 245–64Google Scholar
Magnus, U., ‘Causation by Omission’, in Tichý, L. (ed.), Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Karlowa, 2007), pp. 95–104Google Scholar
Magnus, , ‘Multiple Tortfeasors under German Law’, in Rogers, W. V. H. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Multiple Tortfeasors (The Hague: Kluwer, 2004), pp. 87–102Google Scholar
Magnus, U., ‘Causation in German Tort Law’, in Spier, J. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Causation (The Hague: Kluwer, 2000), pp. 63–73Google Scholar
Magnus, U. and Martín-Casals, M., ‘Comparative Conclusions’, in Magnus, U. and Martín-Casals, M. (eds.), Unification of Tort Law: Contributory Negligence (The Hague: Kluwer, 2004), pp. 259–91Google Scholar
Malaurie, P. and Aynès, L., Les obligations (Paris: Defrénois, 2011)Google Scholar
Malone, W. S., ‘Ruminations on Cause-in-Fact’ (1956) 9 Stanford Law Review 60–99Google Scholar
Mańko, R., ‘The Culture of Private Law in Central Europe after Enlargement: A Polish Perspective’ (2005) 11 European Law Journal 527–48Google Scholar
Marando, G., Le azioni di responsabilità civile per infortuni sul lavoro e malattie professionali (Milan: Giuffrè, 1987)Google Scholar
Marino, V., La responsabilità del datore per infortuni e malattie da lavoro (Milan: Angeli, 1990)Google Scholar
Markesinis, B., ‘Réflexions d’un comparatiste anglais sur et à partir de l’arrêt Perruche’ (2001) Revue trimestrielle de droit civil 77–102Google Scholar
Markesinis, B. and Unberath, H., The German Law of Torts, 4th ed. (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2002)Google Scholar
Marteau, P., La notion de causalité dans la responsabilité civile (Nice: Publications périodiques spécialisées, 1913)Google Scholar
Martín-Casals, M., ‘Proportional Liability in Spain’, in Martín-Casals, M. and Papayannis, D. M. (eds.), Uncertain Causation in Tort Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 43–66Google Scholar
Martín-Casals, M. (ed.), Principios de derecho europeo de la responsabilidad civil: texto y comentario (Navarra: Thomson-Aranzadi, 2008)Google Scholar
Martín-Casals, M. and Solé, J., ‘Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability in Spain’, in Gilead, I., Green, M. D. and Koch, B. (eds.), Proportional Liability: Analytical and Comparative Perspectives (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 295–322Google Scholar
Martinez, P. R., Direito das obrigações, 3rd ed. (Lisboa: AAFDL, 2011)Google Scholar
Marty, G., ‘La relation de cause à effet comme condition de la responsabilité civile’ (1939) Revue trimestrielle de droit civil 685Google Scholar
Mäsch, G., Chance und Schaden (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004)Google Scholar
Masè Dari, F., ‘Svalutazione monetaria e risarcimento del danno’ (1946) I, 2 Giurisprudenza italiana 197–200Google Scholar
Mattei, U., ‘Why the Wind Changed: Intellectual Leadership in Western Law’ (1994) 42 American Journal of Comparative Law 195–218Google Scholar
McGrath, C.P. and Koziol, H., ‘Is Style of Reasoning a Fundamental Difference between the Common Law and the Civil Law?’ (2014) 78 Rabels Zeitschrift 709–49Google Scholar
McGregor, H., ‘Loss of Chance: Where Has It Come from and Where Is It Going?’ (2008) 24 Professional Negligence 2–12Google Scholar
McIvor, C., ‘The “Doubles the Risk” Test for Causation and Other Related Judicial Misconceptions about Epidemiology’, in Pitel, S. G. A, Neyers, J. W. and Chamberlain, E. (eds.), Tort Law: Challenging Orthodoxy (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2013), pp. 215–34Google Scholar
McIvor, C., ‘Debunking some Judicial Myths about Epidemiology and its Relevance to UK Tort Law’ (2013) 21 Medical Law Review 553–87Google Scholar
McMahon, B. and Binchy, W., Law of Torts, 4th ed. (London: Butterworths, 2014)Google Scholar
Menezes Cordeiro, A., Tratado de direito civil português, II, Direito das obrigações, III, Gestão de negócios. Enriquecimento sem causa. Responsabilidade civil (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2010)Google Scholar
Menezes Cordeiro, A., Tratado de direito civil português, II, Direito das obrigações, I, Introdução. Sistemas e direito europeu das obrigações. Dogmática geral (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2009)Google Scholar
Menezes Cordeiro, A., Da modernização do direito civil, I, Aspectos gerais (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2004)Google Scholar
Menezes Cordeiro, A., Tratado de direito civil português, I, Parte geral, III, Pessoas (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2004)Google Scholar
Menezes Leitão, L., Direito das obrigações, I, Introdução. Da constituição das obrigações, 12th ed. (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2015)Google Scholar
Menezes Leitão, L., ‘O dano da vida’ (2012) Cadernos de direito privado, special edition, II Seminário dos Cadernos de Direito Privado. Responsabilidade civil 3–16Google Scholar
Menezes Leitão, L., ‘A responsabilidade civil por danos causados ao ambiente’, in Gomes, C. Amado and Antunes, T. (eds.), Actas do colóquio A responsabilidade civil por dano ambiental (Lisboa: Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa, 2010), pp. 21–41, available at icjp.ptGoogle Scholar
Merryman, J. H., ‘The Italian Style II: Law’ (1966) 18 Stanford Law Review 396–437Google Scholar
Mikelėnas, V. (ed.), LR civilinio kodekso komentaras. Šeštoji knyga. Prievolių teisė (Commentary to the Civil Code of the Republic of Lithuania. Book 6. The Law on Obligations), I (Vilnius: Justitia, 2003)Google Scholar
Mill, J. S., A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive, 8th ed, (London: Longmans Green, 1872)Google Scholar
Miller, C., ‘Epidemiology in the Courtroom: Mixed Messages from Recent British Experience’ (2012) 11 Law, Probability and Risk 85–99Google Scholar
Miller, C., ‘Causation in Personal Injury after (and before) Sienkiewicz’ (2012) 32 Legal Studies 396–420Google Scholar
Mizaras, V., ‘Lietuvos deliktų teisės aktualijos ir tendencijos’, in Mizaras, V. (ed.), Šiuolaikinės civilinės teisės raidos tendencijos ir perspektyvos (Trends and Perspectives in the Development of Contemporary Civil Law) (Vilnius: Justitia, 2007), pp. 51–74Google Scholar
Monateri, P. G., La responsabilità civile (Turin: Utet, 1998)Google Scholar
Monateri, P. G. and Chiaves, F. A., Italian Tort Law (The Hague: Kluwer, 2014)Google Scholar
Moore, M., ‘Responses and Appreciations’, in Ferzan, K. K. and Morse, S. J. (eds.), Legal, Moral, and Metaphysical Truths: The Philosophy of Michael S. Moore (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), p. 343–426Google Scholar
Moore, M. S., Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Moreno Martínez, J. A. (ed.), La responsabilidad civil y su problemática actual (Alicante: Dykinson, 2007)Google Scholar
Moréteau, O., ‘France: French Tort Law in the Light of European Harmonization’ (2013) 6 Journal of Civil Law Studies 768–801Google Scholar
Morgan, J., ‘Lost Causes in the House of Lords: Fairchild v. Glenhaven Funeral Services’ (2003) 66 Modern Law Review 277–84Google Scholar
Mota Pinto, C. A. da, Pinto Monteiro, A. and Mota Pinto, P., Teoria geral do direito civil, 4th ed. (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2005)Google Scholar
Mota Pinto, P., Interesse contratual negativo e interesse contratual positivo, I and II (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2008)Google Scholar
Mota Pinto, P., ‘Indemnização em caso de “nascimento indevido” e de “vida indevida” (“wrongful birth” e “wrongful life”)’, in Nos 20 anos do Código das Sociedades Comerciais. Homenagem aos Profs. Doutores A. Ferrer Correia, Orlando de Carvalho e Vasco Lobo Xavier, III, Vária (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2007), p. 915–46Google Scholar
Moura Vicente, D., Da responsabilidade pré-contratual em direito internacional privado (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2001)Google Scholar
Mummenhoff, W., Erfahrungssätze im Beweis der Kausalität (Cologne: Heymann, 1997)Google Scholar
Napoli, G. E., Il nesso causale come elemento costitutivo del fatto illecito (Naples: ESI, 2012)Google Scholar
Nasarre-Aznar, S., International Encyclopaedia for Tort Law – Spain (The Hague: Kluwer, 2008)Google Scholar
Nenov, I., Criminal Law. Generalities, Part I (Наказателно право. Обща част, 1 част) (Sofia: Nauka I Izkustvo, 1992)Google Scholar
Nesterowicz, M., Prawo medyczne, 9th ed. (Toruń: TNOiK, 2010)Google Scholar
Nesterowicz, M., Prawo medyczne, 8th ed. (Toruń: TNOiK, 2007)Google Scholar
Nesterowicz, M., ‘Odpowiedzialność cywilna w braku ustalenia sprawcy szkody w prawie amerykańskim’, in Id., Prawo cywilne USA (Toruń: Towarzystwo Naukowe Organizacji i Kierownictwa “Dom Organizatora”, 1999), pp. 45–57Google Scholar
Nesterowicz, M. and Bagińska, E., ‘Poland’, in Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B. A. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), Digest of European Tort Law, vol. I, Essential Cases on Natural Causation (Vienna, New York: Springer 2007)Google Scholar
Nesterowicz, M. and Bagińska, E., ‘Multiple Tortfeasors under Polish Law’, in Rogers, W. V. H. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Multiple Tortfeasors (The Hague: Kluwer, 2004), pp. 153–65Google Scholar
Nesterowicz, M. and Bagińska, E., ‘Contributory Negligence under Polish Law’, in Magnus, U. and Martín-Casals, M. (eds.), Unification of Tort Law: Contributory Negligence (The Hague: Kluwer, 2004) pp. 149–62Google Scholar
Nesterowicz, M., Bagińska, E. and den Exter, A., Medical Law in Poland (The Hague: Wolters Kluwer, 2011)Google Scholar
Neuberger (Lord) of Abbotsbury, ‘Loss of a chance and causation’ (2008) 24 Professional Negligence 206–14Google Scholar
Nikolopoulos, P., ‘“Wrongful Birth” and Offence to the Parents’ Personality’ (‘Ζημιογόνος τεκνοποίηση (Wrongful birth) και προσβολή της προσωπικότητας των γονέων’) (2011) 4 Efarmoges Astikou Dikaiou 812–20Google Scholar
Norkūnas, A., ‘Vartotojo teisių dėl žalos, padarytos nekokybiškais produktais, gynimo pokyčiai Lietuvai įstojus į Europos Sąjungą’ (Changes in the Protection of the Consumer Right to Compensation of Damage Caused by Defective Products Introduced by Lithuanian Membership in the European Union) (2006) 80(2) Jurisprudencija 73–9.Google Scholar
Nunes Vicente, M., ‘Algumas reflexões sobre as acções de wrongful life: a jurisprudência Perruche’ (2009) 4 Lex Medicinae 117–41Google Scholar
Olejniczak, A., in Kidyba, A. (ed.), Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz, vol. 3, Zobowiązania – część ogólna (Warsaw: Lexisnexis, 2010)Google Scholar
Olejniczak, A. (ed.), System Prawa Prywatnego. Prawo zobowiązań – część ogólna (Warsaw: C. H. Beck, 2009)Google Scholar
Oliphant, K., ‘Causation in Cases of Evidential Uncertainty: Juridical Techniques and Fundamental Issues’, (2016) 91 Chicago-Kent Law Review 587–602Google Scholar
Oliphant, K., ‘Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability in England and Wales’, in Gilead, I., Green, M. D. and Koch, B. A. (eds.), Proportional Liability: Analytical and Comparative Perspectives (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 121–39Google Scholar
Oliphant, K., ‘Uncertain Causes: The Chinese Tort Liability Act in Comparative Perspective’, in Chen, L. and van Rhee, R. (eds.), Towards a Chinese Civil Code: Historical and Comparative Perspectives (Leiden: Brill, 2012), pp. 395–408Google Scholar
Oliphant, K., ‘Uncertain Factual Causation in the Third Restatement: Some Comparative Notes’ (2011) 37 William Mitchell Law Review 1599–632Google Scholar
Oliphant, K., ‘Alternative Causation: A Comparative Analysis of Austrian and English Law’, in Festschrift für Helmut Koziol (Vienna: Sramek Verlag, 2010), pp. 795–812Google Scholar
Oliphant, K., ‘Proportional Liability’, in Verschraegen, B. (ed.), Interdisciplinary Studies of Comparative and Private International Law, I (Vienna: Jan Sramek, 2010), pp. 179–200Google Scholar
Oliphant, K., ‘Loss of Chance in English Law’ (2008) 16 European Review of Private Law 1061–71Google Scholar
Oliphant, K. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2012 (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013)Google Scholar
Oliphant, K. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2011 (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2012)Google Scholar
Oliphant, K. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law. Basic Texts (Vienna: Jan Sramek Verlag, 2011)Google Scholar
Oliphant, K. and Steininger, M., ‘Aggregation and Divisibility of Damage in Tort Law and Insurance: Comparative Summary’, in Oliphant, K. (ed.), Aggregation and Divisibility of Damage (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2009), pp. 473–517Google Scholar
de Oliveira, G., ‘O direito do diagnóstico pré-natal’, in Temas de direito da medicina (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 1999), pp. 203–23Google Scholar
Pacchioni, G., Diritto civile italiano. Diritto delle obbligazioni, IV, Dei delitti e quasi delitti (Padua: Vallardi, 1940)Google Scholar
Page, J. A., Torts. Proximate Cause (New York: Foundation Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Paijmans, B. M., ‘De bijzondere zorgplicht van scholen. De grondslag en reikwijdte van de civielrechtelijke zorgvuldigheidsnorm van scholen jegens leerlingen’ (diss. Utrecht) (Deventer: Kluwer, 2013)Google Scholar
Pajor, T., ‘Poland’, in Palmer, V. V. and Bussani, M. (eds.), Pure Economic Loss. New Horizons in Comparative Law (London, New York: Routledge-Cavendish, 2008)Google Scholar
Palandt, O., Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, 75th ed. (Munich: Beck, 2016)Google Scholar
Palmer, V. V. and Bussani, M. (eds.), Pure Economic Loss. New Horizons in Comparative Law (London, New York: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009)Google Scholar
Palmerini, E., ‘Il “sottosistema” della responsabilità da nascita indesiderata e le asimmetrie con il regime della responsabilità medica in generale’ (2011) Nuova giurisprudenza civile commentata 468–72Google Scholar
Panowicz–Lipska, J. and Radwański, Z., ‘Przegląd orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego’ (1979) 6 Nowe Prawo 87Google Scholar
Papadimitriou, K. D., ‘Note I under AP 106/2003’ (‘ΑΠ 106/2003, σημ. I’) (2004) Dikaio Epiheiriseon kai Etairion 948–50Google Scholar
Papayannis, D. M., ‘Probabilistic Causation in Efficiency-Based Liability Judgments Legal Theory’ (2014) 20 Legal Theory 210–52Google Scholar
Patti, S., ‘Danno patrimoniale’, in Digesto discipline privatistiche – sezione civile, V (Turin: Utet, 1989), pp. 90–107Google Scholar
Paul, L. A., ‘Counterfactual Theories’, in Beebee, H., Hitchcock, C. and Menzies, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Causation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 158–84Google Scholar
Paul, L. A., ‘Aspect Causation’ (2000) 97 Journal of Philosophy 235–256, reprinted in Collins, J., Hall, N. and Paul, L. A. (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals (Cambridge Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1994), pp. 205–24Google Scholar
Paul, L. A. and Hall, N., Causation: A User’s Guide (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Peczenik, A., Causes and Damages (Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1979)Google Scholar
Peel, E., ‘Loss of a Chance in Medical Negligence’ (2005) 121 Law Quarterly Review 364–70Google Scholar
Pera, G., ‘L’assicurazione contro gli infortuni sul lavoro e la responsabilità civile secondo i giudici costituzionali’ (1967) I Rivista infortuni e malattie professionali 901–33Google Scholar
Pereira Coelho, F. M., O problema da causa virtual na responsabilidade civil, 2nd ed. (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 1998)Google Scholar
Pereira Coelho, F. M., ‘Obrigações. Sumários das lições ao curso de 1966/1967 (Coimbra: typescript, 1967)Google Scholar
Pereira Coelho, F. M., ‘O nexo de causalidade na responsabilidade civil’ (1951) 9 Suplemento ao Boletim da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra 65–242Google Scholar
Perestrelo de Oliveira, A., ‘A prova do nexo de causalidade na lei da responsabilidade civil ambiental’, in Gomes, C. Amado and Antunes, T. (eds.), Actas do colóquio A responsabilidade civil por dano ambiental (Lisboa: Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa, 2010), pp. 172–93, available at icjp.ptGoogle Scholar
Perestrelo de Oliveira, A., Causalidade e imputação na responsabilidade civil ambiental (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2007)Google Scholar
Pessoa Jorge, F., Ensaio sobre os pressupostos da responsabilidade civil, 2nd ed. (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 1999)Google Scholar
Philippot, A., ‘Le droit face aux catastrophes sanitaires: affaire du Distilbène, épilogue?’ (2013) 46 Revue générale de droit médical 93–8Google Scholar
Pierre, Ph. (ed.), ‘Les distorsions du lien de causalité en droit de la responsabilité civile’ (2007) 40 Revue Lamy Droit civil, suppl. no. 2634Google Scholar
Pignarre, G., Brun, P. and Piédelièvre, S., ‘Le jeune homme et la vie: Retour sur l’arrêt Perruche’ (2001) Revue de la Recherche Juridique 477–88Google Scholar
Pijls, A. C. W. and van Boom, W. H., ‘Handhaving van prospectusaansprakelijkheid niet illusoir: vermoeden van causaal verband bij prospectusaansprakelijkheid’ (2010) 6834 Weekblad voor Privaatrecht, Notariaat en Registratie 194–200Google Scholar
Pinheiro, P. and Gorjão Henriques, M., Direito do medicamento (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2009)Google Scholar
Pinto Monteiro, A., ‘Direito a não nascer (anotação ao Acórdão do STJ de 19 de Junho de 2001)’ (2001) 134 Revista de Legislação e de Jurisprudência 371–84Google Scholar
Pinto Monteiro, F., ‘Direito à não-existência, direito a não nascer’, in Comemorações dos 35 anos do Código Civil e dos 25 anos da reforma de 1977, II, A Parte Geral do Código e a teoria geral do direito civil (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2006), pp. 131–8Google Scholar
Pinto Oliveira, N. M., Responsabilidade civil dos administradores — entre direito civil, direito das sociedades e direito da insolvência (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2015)Google Scholar
Pinto Oliveira, N. M., ‘Responsabilidade civil dos administradores pela insolvência culposa’, in Serra, C. (ed.), I Colóquio de direito da insolvência de Santo Tirso (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 2015), pp. 195–256Google Scholar
Pinto Oliveira, N. M., ‘Responsabilidade objectiva’ (2012) II Seminário dos Cadernos de Direito Privado. Responsabilidade civil 107–21Google Scholar
Pinto Oliveira, N. M., Princípios de direito dos contratos (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2011)Google Scholar
Pinto Oliveira, N. M., ‘Colheita de órgãos e ‘casos de provocação’ – Considerações sobre os acórdãos do OLG Schleswig de 3 de Outubro de 1986 e do BGH de 30 de Junho de 1987’ (2006) Lex Medicinæ – Revista portuguesa de direito da saúde 23–9Google Scholar
Pinto Oliveira, N. M., ‘Responsabilidade civil em instituições privadas de saúde: problemas de ilicitude e de culpa’, in Responsabilidade civil dos médicos (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2005), pp. 127–255Google Scholar
Planiol, M., Ripert, G. and Boulanger, J., Traité pratique de droit civil français, II (Paris: LGDJ, 1957)Google Scholar
Pollock, F., The Law of Torts, 11th ed. (London: Stevens and Sons, 1920)Google Scholar
Pontrandolfi, P., ‘La responsabilità civile del datore di lavoro nell’assicurazione infortuni’ (1988) III Rivista giuridica del lavoro 31–48Google Scholar
Porat, A. and Stein, A., Tort Liability under Uncertainty (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Pothier, R.-J., Traité des obligations, in Œuvres de Pothier, annotées et mises en corrélation avec le Code civil et la législation actuelle par J. J. Bugnet, II (Paris: Cosse et Marchal, 1848)Google Scholar
Prosser, W. L., Handbook of the Law of Torts (St. Paul Minn.: West, 1971)Google Scholar
Psillos, S., ‘Regularity Theories’, in Beebee, H., Hitchcock, C. and Menzies, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Causation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 131–57Google Scholar
Puppe, I., ‘The Concept of Causation in the Law’, in Kahmen, B. and Stepanians, M. (eds.), Critical Essays on ‘Causation and Responsibility’ (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 67–109Google Scholar
Puppe, I., ‘Negligence and Responsibility in German Road Traffic Law’ (2003) 11 European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 151–63Google Scholar
Puppe, I., ‘Entscheidungsanmerkung zu BGHSt 37, 107’ (1992) Juristische Rundschau 30–4Google Scholar
Puppe, I., ‘Der objektive Tatbestand der Anstiftung’ (1984) Goltdammer’s Archiv für Strafrecht 101–23Google Scholar
Puppe, I., ‘Zurechnung und Wahrscheinlichkeit’ (1983) 95 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 287–315Google Scholar
Puppe, I., ‘Der Erfolg und seine kausale Erklärung im Strafrecht’ (1980) 92 Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 863–911 (English translation and citations to Spanish translations available at http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=2743259)Google Scholar
Quézel-Ambrunaz, C., Essai sur la causalité en droit de la responsabilité civile (Paris: Dalloz, 2010)Google Scholar
Quézel-Ambrunaz, C., ‘La fiction de la causalité alternative’ (2010) Recueil Dalloz 1162–8Google Scholar
Quill, E., Torts in Ireland, 4th ed. (Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, 2014)Google Scholar
Quill, E. ‘Ireland’, in Oliphant, K. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2011 (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2012), pp. 316–38Google Scholar
Rabin, R. L., ‘Enabling Torts’ (1999) 49 DePaul Law Review 435–53Google Scholar
Radé, C., ‘Causalité juridique et causalité scientifique: de la distinction à la dialectique’ (2012) Dalloz 112Google Scholar
Radwański, Z., ‘Glosa do orz. SN 4.09.1964, I PR 23/67’, OSPiKA 1/1969, item 5Google Scholar
Raffaelli, G. A., ‘Intorno al momento della determinazione del danno’ (1946) 1(I) Foro padano 89–97Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D., ‘Causation in the Law’ (1962) 37 Philosophy 83–4Google Scholar
Raposo, V. L., ‘As wrong actions no início da vida (wrongful conception, wrongful birth e wrongful life) e a responsabilidade médica’ (2010) Revista portuguesa do dano corporal 61–99Google Scholar
Rebhahn, R., Staatshaftung wegen mangelnder Gefahrenabwehr (Vienna: Manz, 1997)Google Scholar
Rechberger, W., ‘Maß für Maß im Zivilprozeß? Ein Beitrag zur Beweismaßdiskussion’, in Festschrift Baumgärtel (Köln: Mohr Siebeck, 1990), pp. 471–90Google Scholar
Reglero Campos, L. F., Tratado de responsabilidad civil, 5th ed., 3 vols. (Navarra: Thomson-Aranzadi, 2014)Google Scholar
Reimann, M., ‘Liability for Defective Products at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century: Emergence of a Worldwide Standard?’ (2003) 51 American Journal of Comparative Law 751–838Google Scholar
Reischauer, R., Spielbüchler, K. and Welser, R., (eds.), Reform des Schadenersatzrechts III: Vorschläge eines Arbeitskreises (Vienna: Manz, 2008)Google Scholar
Ribeiro de Faria, J., ‘Da prova na responsabilidade civil médica – Reflexões em torno do direito alemão’ (2004) Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto 115–95Google Scholar
Ribeiro de Faria, J., Direito das obrigações, II (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 1999)Google Scholar
Rijnhout, R., Schadevergoeding voor derden in personenschadezaken (diss. Utrecht) (The Hague: BJu, 2012)Google Scholar
Ripert, G., ‘Note à Cass. civ., 27 décembre 1944’ (1945) Dalloz 237–8Google Scholar
Riverso, R., ‘Questione amianto: contributi pensionistici e Fondo in favore delle vittime’ (2008) Il lavoro nella giurisprudenza 580–4Google Scholar
Rizzo, M. and Arnold, R., ‘Causal Apportionment in the Law of Torts. An Economic Theory’ (1980) 80 Columbia Law Review 1399–429Google Scholar
Rizzo, N., ‘Momento della determinazione del danno e mora del debitore’, in Rivista di diritto civile, 2010, 245–82Google Scholar
Robbennolt, J. K., ‘Apologies and Reasonableness: Some Implications of Psychology for Torts’ (2010) 59 DePaul Law Review 489–513Google Scholar
Robertson, D. W., ‘Causation in the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Three Arguable Mistakes’ (2009) 44 Wake Forest Law Review 1007–28Google Scholar
Robertson, D. W., ‘The Common Sense of Cause in Fact’ (1996–1997) 75 Texas Law Review 1765–800Google Scholar
Robertson, D. W., ‘Negligence Liability for Crimes and Intentional Torts Committed by Others’ (1992) 67 Tulane Law Review 135–82Google Scholar
Robinson, G. O., ‘Multiple Causation in Tort Law: Reflections on the DES Cases’ (1982) 68 Virginia Law Review 713–69Google Scholar
Rodotà, S., Il problema della responsabilità civile (Milan: Giuffrè, 1960)Google Scholar
Rodríguez de las Heras Ballell, T., Introduction to Spanish Private Law. Facing the Social and Economic Challenges (New York: Routledge, 2010)Google Scholar
Rogers, W. V. H., ‘Comparative Report on Multiple Tortfeasors’, in Rogers, W. V. H. and van Boom, W. H. (eds.), Unification of Tort Law: Multiple Tortfeasors (The Hague, Kluwer, 2004), pp. 271–310Google Scholar
Rogers, W. V. H., ‘Causation under English Law’, in Spier, J. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Causation (The Hague, Kluwer, 2000), pp. 39–51Google Scholar
Rondelli, A., ‘La “presunzione” nella tutela delle malattie professionali: aspetti medico-legali’ (1985) I Rivista infortuni e malattie professionali 585–612Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D., ‘The Causal Connection in Mass Exposure Cases: ‘Public Law’ Vision of the Tort System’ (1984) 97 Harvard Law Review 851–929Google Scholar
Rothmar Herrmann, J., ‘Erstatning og fosterdiagnostik’ (2008) Ugeskrift for Retsvæsen B.143Google Scholar
Roussos, K., ‘Causation and Founding of Liability according to Arts. 914, 71 GCC or according to 914, 922 GCC (legal opinion)’ (‘Αιτιώδης συνάφεια και θεμελίωση ευθύνης κατ’ ΑΚ 914, 71 ή κατ’ 914, 922’) (1994) 35 Elliniki Dikaiosini 1492–7Google Scholar
Ruda González, A., ‘Responsabilidad por cuota de Mercado’ (2003) 3 Indret 1–33.Google Scholar
Rümelin, M., ‘Die Verwendung der Causalbegriffe in Straf- und Civilrecht’ (1900) 90 Archiv für die civilistische Praxis 171–344Google Scholar
Rummel, P. (ed.), ABGB, 3rd ed. (Vienna: Manz, 2004)Google Scholar
Sabard, O., La cause étrangère dans les droits privé et public de la responsabilité extracontractuelle (Paris: LGDJ, 2008)Google Scholar
Sacco, R., ‘Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law (instalments I and II)’ (1991) 39 American Journal of Comparative Law 1–34 (I); 344–401 (II)Google Scholar
Sacco, R., ‘L’ingiustizia del danno di cui all’art. 2043’, in Foro Padano, 1960, I, 1420–8Google Scholar
Säcker, F. J. and Rixecker, R. (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, II, 7th ed. (Munich: C. H. Beck, 2016)Google Scholar
Säcker, F. J. and Rixecker, R. (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, V, 6th ed. (Munich: C. H. Beck, 2013)Google Scholar
Säcker, F. J. and Rixecker, R. (eds.), Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, IV, 6th ed. (Munich: C. H. Beck, 2012).Google Scholar
Safjan, M., ‘Problematyka tzw. bezprawności względnej oraz związku przyczynowego na tle odpowiedzialności za niezgodne z prawem akty normatywne’, in Ogiegło, L., Popiołek, W. and Szpunar, M. (eds.), Rozprawy prawnicze. Księga pamiątkowa Profesora Maksymiliana Pazdana (Kraków: Zakamycze, 2005), pp. 1322–38Google Scholar
Sainte-Rose, J., Chabas, F. and Sargos, P., ‘Réparation du préjudice personnel de l'enfant handicapé lorsque son handicap a été contracté in utero’ (2000) II La semaine juridique (Edition générale) 10438Google Scholar
Saks, M. J., ‘Do We Really Know Anything about the Behavior of the Tort Litigation System – And Why Not?’ (1992) 140 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1147–292Google Scholar
Salvi, C., ‘Responsabilità extracontrattuale (dir. vig.)’, in Enciclopedia del diritto, vol. XXXIX (Milan: Giuffrè, 1988), p. 1185–264Google Scholar
Sanders, J., ‘The “Every Exposure” Cases and the Beginning of the Asbestos Endgame’ (2014) 88 Tulane Law Review 1153–84Google Scholar
Sanders, J., Green, M. D. and Powers, W. C. Jr., ‘The Insubstantiality of the “Substantial Factor” Test for Causation’ (2008) 73 Missouri Law Review 399–431Google Scholar
Santos Júnior, E., Direito das obrigações, I (Lisboa: AAFDL, 2010)Google Scholar
Saxén, H., Adekvans och skada (Åbo: Akademi, 1962)Google Scholar
Schaffer, J., ‘Disconnection and Responsibility: On Moore’s Causation and Responsibility’ (2012) 18 Legal Theory 399–435Google Scholar
Schaffer, J., ‘Contrastive Causation in the Law’ (2010) 16 Legal Theory, 259–97Google Scholar
Schaffer, J., ‘Contrastive Causation’ (2005) 114 The Philosophical Review 297–328Google Scholar
Schaffer, J., ‘Causes Need not Be Physically Connected to their Effects: The Case for Negative Causation’, in Hitchcock, C. (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004), pp. 197–216Google Scholar
Scheiner, N., ‘(Comment) DES and a Proposed Theory of Enterprise Liability’ (1978) 46 Fordham Law Review 963–1007Google Scholar
Schild, A. J. P., ‘Het “conditio sine qua non”-verband bij de schending van een zorgvuldigheidsverplichting: enige wegen naar Rome’ (2009) 6 Rechtsgeleerd Magazijn THEMIS 254–64Google Scholar
Schlechtriem, P., ‘Angleichung der Produktehaftung in der EG’ (1986) Zeitschrift für Versicherungsrecht, Haftungs- und Schadensrecht 1033–43Google Scholar
Schlesinger, R. B., ‘The Past and Future of Comparative Law’ (1995) 43 American Journal of Comparative Law 477–81Google Scholar
Schlesinger, R. B. (ed.), Formation of Contracts: A Study of the Common Core of Legal Systems, II vols. (New York: Oceana-Stevens, 1968)Google Scholar
Schmoeckel, M., Rückert, J. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), Historisch-kritischer Kommentar zum BGB, II (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007)Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, A., On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (2nd ed. 1847) (trans. Payne, E. F. J.) (La Salle Ill.: Open Court, 1999)Google Scholar
Schragel, W., Kommentar zum Amtshaftungsgesetz, 3rd ed. (Vienna: Manz, 2003)Google Scholar
Schultz, M., ‘Further Ruminations on Cause-In-Fact’ (2001) 41 Scandinavian Studies in Law 467–502Google Scholar
Schweizer, M., ‘The Civil Standard of Proof: What Is It, Actually?’ (2016) 20 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 217–34Google Scholar
Schwimann, M. and Kodek, G. (eds.), ABGB Praxiskommentar VI, 4th ed. (Vienna: LexisNexis, 2016)Google Scholar
Schwimann, M. (eds.), ABGB Praxiskommentar VII, 4th ed. (Vienna: LexisNexis, 2016)Google Scholar
Scognamiglio, R., ‘Risarcimento del danno’, in Novissimo Digesto italiano, XVI (Turin: Utet, 1969), p. 4–28Google Scholar
Selelionytė-Drukteinienė, S., ‘Grynai ekonominio pobūdžio žala kaip specifinė žalos kategorija Lietuvos Respublikos deliktų teisėje’ (‘Pure Economic Loss as a Special Kind of Loss in Lithuanian Tort Law’) (2009) 118(4) Jurisprudencija 123–46Google Scholar
Selelionytė-Drukteinienė, S. and Šaltinytė, ́ L., ‘Lithuania’, in Karner, E. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2014 (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2015), pp. 387–420Google Scholar
Selelionytė-Drukteinienė, S. and Šaltinytė, ́ L., ‘Lithuania’, in Oliphant, K. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2012 (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 421–58Google Scholar
Selelionytė-Drukteinienė, S. and Šaltinytė, ́ L., ‘Lithuania ҆, in Oliphant, K. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2011 (Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2012), pp. 386–419Google Scholar
Séners, F., ‘Préjudice réparable’, in Répertoire de la responsabilité de la puissance publique (Paris: Dalloz, 2007)Google Scholar
Serra, C., ‘Emendas à (lei da insolvência) portuguesa – primeiras impressões’ (2012) 4 Direito das sociedades em revista 97–132Google Scholar
Serra, C., ‘The Portuguese Classification of Insolvency from a Comparative Perspective’, in Parry, R. (ed.), The Reform of International Insolvency Rules at European and National Level (Nottingham, Paris: INSOL Europe, 2011), pp. 3–16Google Scholar
Shavell, S., Economic Analysis of Accident Law (Cambridge Mass., London: Harvard University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Shavell, S., ‘Uncertainty over Causation and the Determination of Civil Liability’ (1985) 28 Journal of Law and Economic 587–609Google Scholar
Shavell, S., ‘An Analysis of Causation and the Scope of Liability in the Law of Torts’ (1980) 9 Journal of Legal Studies 463–516Google Scholar
Sherman, P., ‘Agent Orange and the Problem of the Indeterminate Plaintiff’ (1986) 52 Brooklyn Law Review 369–95Google Scholar
Sieder, F., Zeitler, H. and Dahme, H. (eds.), Wasserhaushaltsgesetz, Abwasserabgabengesetz, 49th supplement (Munich: C. H. Beck, 2015)Google Scholar
Sinde Monteiro, J. F., ‘Définition de la causalité; la causalité dans les projets nationaux’, in Jourdain, P. (ed.), Le droit français de la responsabilité civil confronté aux projets européens d’harmonisation (Paris: IRJS Editions, 2011), pp. 369–89Google Scholar
Sinde Monteiro, J. F., ‘Responsabilidade delitual. Da ilicitude’, in Comemorações dos 35 anos do Código Civil e dos 25 anos da Reforma de 1977, III, Direito das obrigações (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2007), pp. 453–81Google Scholar
Sinde Monteiro, J. F., ‘Rudimentos da responsabilidade civil’ (2005) Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto 349–80Google Scholar
Sinde Monteiro, J. F., ‘Obrigações. Aditamentos’ (Direito delitual) (Coimbra: typescript, 1994)Google Scholar
Sinde Monteiro, J. F., Responsabilidade por conselhos, recomendações ou informações (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 1990)Google Scholar
Škárová, M., ‘Dokazování příčinné souvislosti z hlediska praxe Nejvyššího soudu České republiky’, in Tichý, L. (ed.), Prokazování příčinné souvislosti multikauzálních škod (Praha: Univerzita Karlova, 2010), pp. 41–5Google Scholar
Slepaite, L., ‘Lithuania’, in Smits, J. M. (ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, 2nd ed. (Cheltenham: Elgar 2012), pp. 555–9Google Scholar
Smits, J. M., ‘The Netherlands’, in Smits, J. M. (ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, 2nd ed. (Cheltenham: Elgar 2012), pp. 620–4Google Scholar
Sośniak, M., Cywilna odpowiedzialność lekarza 2nd ed. (Warsaw: Wydawn. Prawnicze, 1977)Google Scholar
de Sousa Teixeira, M., O concurso de títulos de aquisição da prestação (Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 1988)Google Scholar
Spencer, J. R., ‘Damages for Lost Chances: Lost for Good?’ [2005] Cambridge Law Journal 282–5Google Scholar
Spier, J., ‘General Introduction’, in European Group on Tort Law, Principles of European Tort Law (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2005), pp. 12–18Google Scholar
Spier, J., Schadevergoeding algemeen, III (Mon. BW B36) (Deventer: Kluwer, 1992)Google Scholar
Spier, J. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Causation (The Hague, Kluwer, 2000)Google Scholar
Spier, J. and Haazen, P. A., ‘Comparative Conclusions on Causation’, in Spier, J. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Causation (The Hague, Kluwer, 2000), pp. 127–54Google Scholar
Spiridakis, I. and Perakis, E., Civil Code (Αστικός Κώδικας), vol. B/1 (Athens: Ant. N. Sakkoulas, 1977)Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘An “Extended But-For” Test for the Causal Relation in the Law of Obligations’ (2015) 35 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 697–726Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Uncertain Causes: Asbestos in UK Courts’, in Martín-Casals, M. and Papayannis, D. M. (eds.), Uncertain Causation in Tort Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 87–113Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Unnecessary Causes’ (2013) 129 Law Quarterly Review 39–65Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Factual Causation, Mesothelioma and Statistical Validity’ (2012) 128 Law Quarterly Review 221–31Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘The Fairchild Doctrine: Arguments on Breach and Materiality’ (2012) Cambridge Law Journal 32–4Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Factual causation’ (2010) 38 Federal Law Review 467–84Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘The Two Explosive Proof-of-Causation Doctrines Central to Asbestos Claims’ (2009) 74 Brooklyn Law Review 1011–38Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Causation in the Law’, in Beebee, H., Hitchcock, C. and Menzies, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Causation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 744–70Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Choosing What We Mean by “Causation” in the Law’ (2008) 73 Missouri Law Review 433–80Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Two Causal Fictions at the Heart of U. S. Asbestos Doctrine’ (2006) 122 Law Quarterly Review 189–95Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Occam’s Razor Reveals an Orthodox Basis for Chester v. Afshar’ (2006) 122 Law Quarterly Review 426–48Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Loss of the Chance of Cure from Cancer’ (2005) 68 Modern Law Review 996–1006Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Cause in Fact and the Scope of Liability for Consequences’ (2003) 119 Law Quarterly Review 388–425Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Legal Cause: Cause-in-Fact and the Scope of Liability for Consequences’ (2001) 54 Vanderbilt Law Review 941–1109Google Scholar
Stapleton, J., ‘Peripheral Parties, Duty of Care: Peripheral Parties and Alternative Means of Deterrence’ (1995) 111 Law Quarterly Review 301–45Google Scholar
Starck, B., ‘La pluralité des causes de dommages et la responsabilité civile’ (1970) La semaine juridique I, n° 2339Google Scholar
Stathopoulos, M., ‘Damages and Protection of the Personality of a Disabled Child’ (‘Αποζημίωση και προστασία της προσωπικότητας ανάπηρου παιδιού’) (2009) Θ Chronika Idiotikou Dikaiou 97–106Google Scholar
Stathopoulos, M., Contract Law in Hellas, 2nd ed. (The Hague: Kluwer, 2008)Google Scholar
Stathopoulos, M., Law of Obligations. General Part (Γενικό Ενοχικό Δίκαιο) (Athens, Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas, 2004)Google Scholar
Stathopoulos, M., Law of Obligations. General Part (Γενικό Ενοχικό Δίκαιο), I (Athens: Ant. N. Sakkoulas, 1978)Google Scholar
Stauch, M., ‘Medical Malpractice and Compensation in Germany’ (2011) 86 Chicago-Kent Law Review 1139–68Google Scholar
Stauch, M., ‘“Material Contribution” as a Response to Causal Uncertainty: Time for a Rethink’ (2009) 68 Cambridge Law Journal 27–30Google Scholar
Stauch, M., The Law of Medical Negligence in England and Germany: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2008)Google Scholar
Stauch, M., ‘Risk and Remoteness of Damage in Negligence’ (2001) 64 Modern Law Review 191–214Google Scholar
J. von Staudingers Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch (Berlin: Sellier/de Gruyter), vol. §§ 823 E-I, 824, 825 (2009); vol. §§ 830–838 (2012)Google Scholar
Stecki, L., ‘Problematyka odpowiedzialności za szkodę pośrednią’, in Sołtysiński, S. (ed.), Problemy kodyfikacji prawa cywilnego (studia i rozprawy). Księga pamiątkowa ku czci profesora Zbigniewa Radwańskiego (Poznań: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, 1990), pp. 287–304Google Scholar
Steel, S., Proof of Causation in Tort Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Steel, S., ‘Justifying Exceptions to Proof of Causation in Tort Law’ (2015) 78 Modern Law Review 729–58Google Scholar
Steel, S., ‘Causation and Scope of Responsibility’, in Oliphant, K. (ed.), The Law of Tort, 3rd ed. (Butterworths: London, 2015), pp. 779–814Google Scholar
Steel, S., ‘Causation in Tort and Crime: Unity or Divergence?’, in Dyson, M. (ed.), Unravelling Tort and Crime (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 239–74Google Scholar
Steel, S., ‘Rationalising Loss of a Chance in Tort’, in Pitel, S. G. A, Neyers, J. W. and Chamberlain, E. (eds.), Tort Law: Challenging Orthodoxy (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2013), pp. 235–72Google Scholar
Steel, S., ‘Sienkiewicz v Greif and Exceptional Doctrines of Natural Causation’ (2011) 3 Journal of European Tort Law 294–311Google Scholar
Steel, S. and Ibbetson, D., ‘More Grief on Uncertain Causation in Tort’ (2011) Cambridge Law Journal 451–68Google Scholar
Stegmüller, W., Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytische Philosophie 1: Erklärung, Begründung, Kausalität, 2nd ed. (Berlin: Springer, 1983)Google Scholar
Steininger, B. C., ‘Austria’, in Karner, E. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2014 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2015), pp. 1–23Google Scholar
Steininger, B. C., ‘Austria’, in Oliphant, K. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2012 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 27–55Google Scholar
Steininger, B. C., ‘Austria’, in Oliphant, K. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2011 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2012), pp. 1–29Google Scholar
Stella, F. ‘La vitalità del modello della sussunzione sotto leggi. A confronto il pensiero di Wright e Mackie’, in Stella, F. (ed. & trans.), I Saperi del Giudice. La Causalità e Il Ragionevole Dubbio (Milan: Giuffrè, 2004), pp. 1–70 (English translation by Stella available at http://works.bepress.com/richard_wright/34)Google Scholar
Study Group on a European Civil Code and Research Group on EC Private Law, Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law. Draft Common Frame of Reference (Munich: Sellier 2008)Google Scholar
Stürner, R. (ed.), Jauernig: Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, 16th ed. (Munich: Beck, 2015)Google Scholar
Sugarman, S. D., ‘A Century of Change in Personal Injury Law’ (2000) 88 California Law Review 2403–36Google Scholar
Šustek, P. and Holčapek, T., Teorie a praxe informovaného souhlasu ve zdravotnictví (Praha: ASPI Publishing, 2007)Google Scholar
Švestka, J. and Dvořák, J., et alii, Občanské právo hmotné, 2, Díl třetí: závazkové právo, 5th ed. (Praha: Wolter Kluwer ČR, 2009)Google Scholar
Švestka, J., Dvořák, J. and Fiala, J., Občanský zákoník. Komentář, vol. VI (Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2014)Google Scholar
Švestka, J., Dvořák, J., Elischer, D., Frinta, O., Pohl, T., Liška, P., Mrázová, I., Zuklínová, M. and Růžička, K., Občanské právo hmotné, 5th ed. (Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2009)Google Scholar
Švestka, J., Spáčil, J., Škárová, M. and Hulmák, M., et alii, Občanský zákoník I. § 1–459. Komentář, 2nd ed. (Praha: Beck, 2009)Google Scholar
Švestka, J., Spáčil, J., Škárová, M. and Hulmák, M., et alii, Občanský zákoník I. § 1–459. Komentář, 1st ed. (Praha: Beck, 2008)Google Scholar
Swedish Government Official Reports 2013:23 Ersättning vid läkemedelsskador och miljöhänsyn i läkemedelsförmånerna, available at regeringen.se/rattsdokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2013/04/sou-201323/Google Scholar
Swedish Government Official Reports 2011:16 Allmän skyldighet att hjälpa nödställda?, available at regeringen.se/rattsdokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2011/03/sou-201116/Google Scholar
‘Symposium on Legal and Scientific Perspectives on Causation in Mass Tort Litigation’, (1991) 1 Courts, Health Science & the LawGoogle Scholar
Szpunar, A., Odszkodowanie za szkodę majątkową (Bydgoszcz: Branta, 1998)Google Scholar
Szpunar, A., Ustalenie odszkodowania w prawie cywilnym (Warsaw: Wydaw. Prawnicze, 1975)Google Scholar
Szpunar, A., Odszkodowanie w razie śmierci osoby bliskiej (Warsaw: Wydaw. Prawnicze, 1973)Google Scholar
Takoff, C., ‘Bulgaria’, in Koziol, Helmut and Steininger, Barbara C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2005 (Vienna, New York: Springer 2006), pp. 614–49Google Scholar
Taruffo, M., ‘Proving Complex Facts: The Case of Mass Torts’, in Martín-Casals, M. and Papayannis, D. M. (eds.), Uncertain Causation in Tort Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 165–75Google Scholar
Taruffo, M., La semplice verità. Il giudice e la costruzione dei fatti (Bari: Laterza, 2009)Google Scholar
Taruffo, M., ‘Rethinking the Standards of Proof’ (2003) 51 American Journal of Comparative Law 659–77Google Scholar
Tasev, S., Tort Liability (Деликтната отговорност) (Sofia: Ciela, 2009)Google Scholar
Tedeschi, G., ‘Il momento della determinazione del danno’ (1934) I Rivista di diritto commerciale 239–67Google Scholar
Tedeschi, G., ‘Il danno e il momento della sua determinazione’, (1933) I Rivista di diritto privato 254–80Google Scholar
Teff, H., ‘“Market share” liability – A Novel Approach to Causation’ (1982) 31 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 840–4Google Scholar
Teixeira Pedro, R., A responsabilidade civil do médico. Reflexões sobre a perda de chance e a tutela do doente lesado (Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2009)Google Scholar
Thomson, J. J., ‘Some Reflections on Hart and Honoré’s Causation in the Law’, in Kramer, M. H., Grant, C., Colburn, B. and Hatzistavrou, A. (eds.), The Legacy of H. L. A. Hart: Legal, Political and Moral Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 143–64Google Scholar
Tichý, L., ‘Dokazování příčinné souvislosti a proporcionální odpovědnost za škodu’, in Tichý, L. (ed.), Prokazování příčinné souvislosti multikauzálních škod (Praha: Univerzita Karlova, 2010), pp. 57–68Google Scholar
Tichý, L. (ed.), Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Karlowa, 2007)Google Scholar
Tichý, L., ‘Causality in Contract: Differences from Tort’, in Tichý, L. (ed.), Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Karlowa, 2007), pp. 171–85Google Scholar
van Tilburg, W., ‘Affectieschade, shockschade en compensatie: de visie van een psychiater’ (2004) 50 Verkeersrecht 7–12Google Scholar
Tjong Tjin Tai, T. F. E., Zorgplichten en zorgethiek (Deventer: Kluwer, 2007)Google Scholar
Toepel, F., ‘Causal Overdetermination’, in Kahmen, B. and Stepanians, M. (eds.), Critical Essays on ‘Causation and Responsibility’ (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 111–32Google Scholar
Tomandl, T., ‘Unfallversicherung’, in Tomandl, T., System des österreichischen Sozialversicherungsrechts (Vienna: Manz, 1977, loose leaf collection)Google Scholar
Tousis, A., Law of Obligations. General Part (Ενοχικόν Δίκαιον. Γενικόν μέρος) (Athens: Αnt. N. Sakkoulas, 1973)Google Scholar
Traeger, L., Der Kausalbegriff im Straf- und Zivilrecht (Marburg: N. G. Elwert, 1904)Google Scholar
Trimarchi, P., Causalità e danno (Milan: Giuffrè, 1967)Google Scholar
Trimarchi, P., ‘Condizione sine qua non, causalità alternativa ipotetica e danno’ (1964) Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile 1431–60Google Scholar
Trimarchi, P., Rischio e responsabilità oggettiva (Milan: Giuffrè, 1961)Google Scholar
Trouli, E., ‘Medical Liability for Wrongful Life and Wrongful Birth’ (‘Ιατρική ευθύνη για ζημιογόνο ζωή (wrongful life) και ζημιογόνο τεκνοποίηση (wrongful birth)’) (2008) Digesta 384–441Google Scholar
Tsiros, D., ‘Medical Liability: Damages for a Child Born Invalid because of a Medical Fault Which Deprived the Mother from Aborting’ (‘Ιατρική ευθύνη: αποζημίωση παιδιού που γεννήθηκε ανάπηρο λόγω ιατρικού σφάλματος που εμπόδισε τη μητέρα να διακόψει την κύηση’) (2004) 45 Elliniki Dikaiosini 61–75Google Scholar
Tulibacka, M., Product Liability Law in Transition. A Central European Perspective (Furnham: Ashgate, 2009)Google Scholar
Tunc, A., ‘Note à App. Paris, 18 avril 1955’ (1956) 9 (III) Dalloz 354–5Google Scholar
Tunc, A., ‘Les récents développements des droit anglais et américain sur la relation de causalité entre la faute et le dommage dont on doit réparation’ (1953) 5 Revue internationale de droit comparé 5–54Google Scholar
Turton, G., Evidential Uncertainty in Causation in Negligence (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2016)Google Scholar
Turton, G., ‘Using NESS to Overcome the Confusion Created by the “Material Contribution to Harm” Test for Causation in Negligence’ (2014) 30 Professional Negligence 50–73Google Scholar
Twerski, A. and Sebok, A. J., ‘Liability Without Cause? Further Ruminations on Cause-in Fact as Applied to Handgun Liability’ (2000) 32 Connecticut Law Review 1379–409Google Scholar
Ulfbeck, V. and Siig, K., ‘Denmark’ in Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B. A. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), Digest of European Tort Law, II, Essential Cases on Damage (Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2011)Google Scholar
UN General Assembly, In-depth Study on all Forms of Violence against Women: Report of the Secretary-General, 6 July 2006 (United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, Survey of 2000), A/61/122/Add.1Google Scholar
Vegter, M. S. A., Vergoeding van psychisch letsel door de werkgever (diss. VU Amsterdam) (The Hague: Sdu, 2005)Google Scholar
Verheij, A. J., ‘Vergoedbaarheid van shockschade van professionele hulpverleners bij rampen’, in Akkermans, A. J. and Brans, E. H. P. (eds.), Aansprakelijkheid en schadeverhaal bij rampen (Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri, 2002), pp. 281–303Google Scholar
Verständig, A., ‘EU-rättsligregleringavkreditvärderingsinstitut’ (2014) Svensk Juristtidning 9–35Google Scholar
Vicente Domingo, E., Lucro cesante (Madrid: Ed. Reus, 2014).Google Scholar
Viney, G., Introduction à la responsabilité, 3rd ed. (Paris: LGDJ, 2008)Google Scholar
Viney, G., ‘Tort Liability’, in Bermann, G. A. and Picard, E. (eds.), Introduction to French Law (The Hague: Kluwer 2008), pp. 237–62Google Scholar
Viney, G. and Jourdain, P., Les conditions de la responsabilité, 4th ed. (Paris: LGDJ, 2013)Google Scholar
Vlasák, M., ‘Odpovědnost za škodu v evropském a českém kontextu’, Právní fórum, 2009, VI/5, 179–84Google Scholar
Vlasák, M., ‘Vybrané otázky práva civilních deliktů v novém občanském zákoníku na pozadí PETL’, Právní rozhledy, 2012, XX/15–16, 561–567Google Scholar
Voyiakis, E., ‘The Great Illusion: Tort Law and Exposure to Danger of Physical Harm’ (2009) 72 Modern Law Review 909–35Google Scholar
Vysokajová, M., Kahle, B., Randlová, N., Hůrka, P. and Doležílek, J., Zákoník práce: komentář, 4th ed. (Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2013)Google Scholar
Wagner, G., ‘Aggregation and Divisibility of Damage in Germany: Tort Law and Insurance’, in Oliphant, K. (ed.), Aggregation and Divisibility of Damage (Vienna, New York: Springer 2009), pp. 175–220Google Scholar
Wagner, G., ‘Proportionalhaftung für ärztliche Behandlungsfehler de lege lata’, in Festschrift Hirsch (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008), pp. 453–67Google Scholar
Wagner, G., ‘German Report’, in Wagner, G. (ed.), Tort Law and Liability Insurance (Munich: Springer, 2005), pp. 87–117Google Scholar
Wagner, W., Obligations in Polish law (Leiden: Sijthoff, 1974)Google Scholar
Weir, T., An Introduction to Tort Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Weir, T., Complex Liabilities, in International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, vol. IX: Torts, Ch. 12 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1976)Google Scholar
Welser, R., ‘Zur solidarischen Schadenshaftung bei ungeklärter Verursachung im deutschen Recht’ (1968) 9 Zeitschrift für Rechtsvergleichung 38–49Google Scholar
Welser, R. and Zöchling-Jud, B., Bürgerliches Recht II, 14th ed. (Vienna: Manz, 2015)Google Scholar
Werro, F., ‘La pluralité des responsables: quelques principes et distinctions’, in Werro, F. (ed.), La pluralité des responsables (Zurich: Schulthess, 2007)Google Scholar
Werro, F., Palmer, V. V. and Hahn, A.-C., Strict Liability in European Tort Law: An Introduction, in Werro, F. and Palmer, V. V. (eds.), The Boundaries of Strict Liability in European Tort Law (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2004), pp. 3–35Google Scholar
West, E., ‘The Utility of the NESS Test of Factual Causation in Scots Law’ (2013) 4 Aberdeen Student Law Review 39–62Google Scholar
Widmer, P., ‘Causation under Swiss Law’, in Spier, J. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Causation (The Hague: Kluwer, 2000), pp. 105–22Google Scholar
Widmer, P., ‘The Concept of Unlawfulness: Function and Relevance under Swiss Law’, in Koziol, H. (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Wrongfulness (The Hague: Kluwer, 1998), pp. 115–27Google Scholar
Wilburg, W., The Development of a Flexible System in the Area of Private Law (trans. Hausmaninger, H.) (Vienna: Manzsche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung, 2000)Google Scholar
Wilburg, W., Die Elemente des Schadensrechts (Marburg: Elwert’sche Verlag, 1941)Google Scholar
Williams, G., ‘Causation in the Law’ (1961) 19 Cambridge Law Journal 62–85Google Scholar
Williams, G., ‘The Risk Principle’ (1961) 77 Law Quarterly Review 179–212Google Scholar
Winiger, B., ‘Multiple Tortfeasors’, in Tichý, L. (ed.), Causation in Law (Prague: Univerzita Karlowa, 2007), pp. 79–94Google Scholar
Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B. and Zimmermann, R., ‘Comparative report’, in Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), Digest of European Tort Law, I, Essential Cases on natural Causation (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2007)Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co, Ltd., 1922)Google Scholar
Wojcik, K.-P., ‘Haftung von Ratingagenturen’ [2013] Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2385–9Google Scholar
Wright, R. W., ‘Causation: Metaphysics or Intuition?’, in Ferzan, K. K. and Morse, S. J. (eds.), Legal, Moral, and Metaphysical Truths: The Philosophy of Michael S. Moore (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016) pp. 171–86Google Scholar
Wright, R. W., ‘The New Old Efficiency Theories of Causation and Liability’ (2014) 7 Journal of Tort Law 65–95Google Scholar
Wright, R.W., ‘The NESS Account of Natural Causation: A Response to Criticisms’, in Goldberg, R. (ed.), Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011), pp. 285–322Google Scholar
Wright, R. W., ‘Proving Causation: Probability versus Belief’, in Goldberg, R. (ed.), Perspectives on Causation (Oxford: Hart, 2011), pp. 195–220Google Scholar
Wright, R. W., ‘Proving Facts: Belief versus Probability’, in Koziol, H. and Steininger, B. C. (eds.), European Tort Law 2008 (Vienna: Springer, 2009), pp. 75–105Google Scholar
Wright, R. W., ‘Liability for Possible Wrongs: Causation, Statistical Probability, and the Burden of Proof’ (2008) 41 Loyola Los Angeles Law Review 1295–1343Google Scholar
Wright, R. W., ‘The Nightmare and the Noble Dream: Hart and Honoré on Causation and Responsibility’, in Kramer, M. H., Grant, C., Colburn, B. and Hatzistavrou, A. (eds.), The Legacy of H. L. A. Hart: Legal, Political and Moral Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 165–77Google Scholar
Wright, R. W., ‘Acts and Omissions as Positive and Negative Causes’, in Neyers, J. W., Chamberlain, E. and Pitel, S. G. A. (eds.), Emerging Issues in Tort Law (Oxford, Portland: Hart, 2007), pp. 287–307Google Scholar
Wright, R. W., ‘The Grounds and Extent of Legal Responsibility’ (2003) 40 San Diego Law Review 1425–1531Google Scholar
Wright, R. W., ‘Once More into the Bramble Bush: Duty, Causal Contribution, and the Extent of Legal Responsibility’ (2001) 54 Vanderbilt Law Review 1071–1132Google Scholar
Wright, R. W., ‘Causation, Responsibility, Risk, Probability, Naked Statistics, and Proof: Pruning the Bramble Bush by Clarifying the Concepts’ (1988) 73 Iowa Law Review 1001–77Google Scholar
Wright, R. W., ‘Causation in Tort Law’ (1985) 73 California Law Review 1735–1828Google Scholar
Wright, R. W., ‘Actual Causation vs. Probabilistic Linkage: The Bane of Economic Analysis’ (1985) 14 Journal of Legal Studies, 435–56Google Scholar
Wright, R. W. and Puppe, I., ‘Causation: Linguistic, Philosophical, Legal, and Economic’ (2016) 91 Chicago-Kent Law Review 461–502Google Scholar
Young, R., Faure, M. and Fenn, P., ‘Causality and Causation in Tort Law’ (2004) 24 International Review of Law and Economics 507–23Google Scholar
van der Zalm, I., ‘Schadevergoeding bij overlijden: een stoel die een soort tafeltje is’, in van Boom, W. H., Dam-Lely, J. H. and Lindenbergh, S. D. (eds.), Rake remedies (The Hague: BJu, 2011), p. 47–67Google Scholar
van Zeben, C. J., Du Pon, J. W. and Olthof, M. M., Parlementaire Geschiedenis van het Nieuwe Burgerlijk Wetboek, 6, Algemeen gedeelte van het verbintenissenrecht (Deventer: Kluwer, 1981)Google Scholar
Zervogianni, E., ‘Ambiguous Issues of Alternative Causation. Concurrence of the Act of a Third Person with Hazard or with an Act of the Victim’ (‘Αμφισβητούμενα ζητήματα διαζευκτικής αιτιότητας. Συρροή ενέργειας τρίτου προσώπου με τυχαίο περιστατικό ή ενέργεια του ζημιωθέντος’) (2010) 51 Elliniki Dikaiosini 949–63Google Scholar
Zervogianni, E., ‘An Alternative Approach of Cases of Uncertain Causation’ (‘Εναλλακτική προσέγγιση των περιπτώσεων «αβέβαιης αιτιότητας»’) (2006) Digesta 347–51.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, R., The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Zimmermann, R. and Kleinschmidt, J., ‘Germany’, in Winiger, B., Koziol, H., Koch, B. A. and Zimmermann, R. (eds.), Digest of European Tort Law, I, Essential Cases on Natural Causation (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2007)Google Scholar
Żmij, G., ‘Wrongfulness as a Liability’s Prerequisite in Art. 415 of Polish Civil Code’, in Heiderhoff, B. and Żmij, G. (eds.), Tort Law in Poland, Germany and Europe (Munich: Springer, 2009), pp. 13–22Google Scholar
Zweigert, K. and Kötz, H., Introduction to Comparative Law (trans. Weir, T.), 3rd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Marta Infantino, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Eleni Zervogianni, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki
  • Book: Causation in European Tort Law
  • Online publication: 08 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108289887.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Marta Infantino, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Eleni Zervogianni, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki
  • Book: Causation in European Tort Law
  • Online publication: 08 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108289887.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Marta Infantino, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Eleni Zervogianni, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki
  • Book: Causation in European Tort Law
  • Online publication: 08 December 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108289887.010
Available formats
×