Book contents
- The Cambridge World History of Sexualities
- The Cambridge World History of Sexualities
- The Cambridge World History of Sexualities
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures in Volume II
- Contributors to Volume II
- Editors’ Preface to the Series
- 1 Human Sexuality: The Evolutionary Legacy of Mating, Parenting, and Family Formation
- 2 Sexuality in Ancient Egypt: Pleasures, Desires, Norms, and Representations
- 3 Sexuality in the Systems of Thought and Belief of the Ancient Near East
- 4 Sexuality in Traditional South Asian Systems of Thought and Belief
- 5 Discourses of Desire in Ancient Greece and Rome
- 6 Writing a History of Sexuality for Pre-Modern China
- 7 Sexuality in Traditional Systems of Thought and Belief in Pre-modern Japan
- 8 African Traditions of Sexualities
- 9 Sexuality in the Traditional Systems of Thought and Belief of the Americas
- 10 Oceanic Sexualities: Persistence, Change, Resistance
- 11 Sexuality in Buddhist Traditions
- 12 Sexuality in Jewish Traditions
- 13 Sexuality in Christian Traditions
- 14 Sexuality in Islamic Traditions
- 15 Scientific Sex in the Modern World
- 16 Sexuality in Marxism and Socialism
- 17 Feminism and Modern Sexuality
- 18 Post-Colonialism and Sexuality
- Index
- Contents to Volumes I, III, and IV
- References
1 - Human Sexuality: The Evolutionary Legacy of Mating, Parenting, and Family Formation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 April 2024
Book contents
- The Cambridge World History of Sexualities
- The Cambridge World History of Sexualities
- The Cambridge World History of Sexualities
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures in Volume II
- Contributors to Volume II
- Editors’ Preface to the Series
- 1 Human Sexuality: The Evolutionary Legacy of Mating, Parenting, and Family Formation
- 2 Sexuality in Ancient Egypt: Pleasures, Desires, Norms, and Representations
- 3 Sexuality in the Systems of Thought and Belief of the Ancient Near East
- 4 Sexuality in Traditional South Asian Systems of Thought and Belief
- 5 Discourses of Desire in Ancient Greece and Rome
- 6 Writing a History of Sexuality for Pre-Modern China
- 7 Sexuality in Traditional Systems of Thought and Belief in Pre-modern Japan
- 8 African Traditions of Sexualities
- 9 Sexuality in the Traditional Systems of Thought and Belief of the Americas
- 10 Oceanic Sexualities: Persistence, Change, Resistance
- 11 Sexuality in Buddhist Traditions
- 12 Sexuality in Jewish Traditions
- 13 Sexuality in Christian Traditions
- 14 Sexuality in Islamic Traditions
- 15 Scientific Sex in the Modern World
- 16 Sexuality in Marxism and Socialism
- 17 Feminism and Modern Sexuality
- 18 Post-Colonialism and Sexuality
- Index
- Contents to Volumes I, III, and IV
- References
Summary
This chapter reviews what can be gleaned about human sexuality from the evolutionary and ethnographic record. Ancestral human sexuality leaves neither fossil nor archaeological evidence, but inferences about how humans mated, consorted, parented, formed partnerships, and aggregated into families can be drawn from two large and growing bodies of work, both discussed in this chapter. The first are anatomical and biological indicators of ancestral mating patterns inferred from fossil evidence as well as observations from nonhuman primates. The second is ethnographic research across an array of contemporary human societies, which highlights variation in mating, marriage, and family structure. Together, biological indicators and cross-cultural patterns shed light on the legacy, constraints, and possibilities carried forward into the diverse and variable expression of human sexuality today. Humans have a deep ancestry in a social structure of males and females living in social groups together, although how humans organize themselves is structurally different from anything observed in our closest relatives. Not only do families form around long-term pairbonds in all societies, but there is also a great deal of flexibility in who constitutes the pairbond, the families that surround them, and in the prevalence of extra-pair relationships.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge World History of Sexualities , pp. 1 - 21Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Further Reading
Anderson, Kermyt G. ‘How Well Does Paternity Confidence Match Actual Paternity?’ Current Anthropology 47 (2006): 511–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckerman, Stephen, and Valentine, Paul, eds. Cultures of Multiple Fathers: The Theory and Practice of Partible Paternity in Lowland South America. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian R., Laland, Kevin N., and Borgerhoff Mulder, Monique. ‘Bateman’s Principles and Human Sex Roles’. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24 (2009): 297–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buston, Peter M., and Emlen, Stephen T.. ‘Cognitive Processes Underlying Human Mate Choice: The Relationship between Self-perception and Mate Preference in Western Society’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, no. 15 (2003): 8805–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapais, Bernard. ‘Monogamy, Strongly Bonded Groups, and the Evolution of Human Social Structure’. Evolutionary Anthropology 22 (2013): 52–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapais, Bernard. Primeval Kinship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Wood, Wendy. ‘The Origins of Sex Differences in Human Behavior: Evolved Dispositions versus Social Roles’. American Psychologist 54 (1999): 408–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Jackie, Dowrick, Chris, and Lloyd-Williams, Mari. ‘The Long-term Impact of Early Parental Death: Lessons from a Narrative Study’. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 106, no. 2 (2013): 57–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fromhage, Lutz, Elgar, Mark A., and Schneider, Jutta M.. ‘Faithful without Care: The Evolution of Monogyny’. Evolution 59 (2005): 1400–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Gray, Peter B., and Anderson, Kermyt G.. Fatherhood: Evolution and Human Paternal Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Gurven, Michael, and Hill, Kim. ‘Why Do Men Hunt? A Reevaluation of “Man the Hunter” and the Sexual Division of Labor’. Current Anthropology 50 (2009): 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1086/595620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrdy, Sarah B. Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Kinsey, Alfred C., Pomeroy, Wardell. B., Martin, Clyde E., and Gebhard, Paul M.. Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1953.Google Scholar
Kramer, Karen L. ‘Cooperative Breeding and Its Significance to the Demographic Success of Humans’. Annual Review of Anthropology 39 (2010): 414–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Karen L., and Russell, A. F.. ‘Was Monogamy a Key Step on the Hominin Road? Reevaluation of the Monogamy Hypothesis in the Evolution of Cooperative Breeding’. Evolutionary Anthropology 24 (2015): 73–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, Karen L., Schacht, R., and Bell, A.. ‘Adult Sex Ratios and Partner Scarcity among Hunter-Gatherers: Implications for Dispersal Patterns and the Evolution of Human Sociality’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences 372, no. 1729 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lancaster, Jane B., Kaplan, Hillard, Hill, Kim, and Hurtado, A. Magdalena.. ‘The Evolution of Life History, Intelligence and Diet among Chimpanzees and Human Foragers’. In Perspectives in Ethology: Evolution, Culture and Behavior, Vol. 13, ed. Tonneau, Francois and Thompson, Nicholas S., 47–72. New York: Kluwer Academic, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masquelier, Adeline. ‘Nomads Who Cultivate Beauty: Wo’daa’be Dances and Visual Arts’. International Journal of African Historical Studies 35 (2002): 157–9. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schacht, Ryan, and Bell, Adrian V.. ‘The Evolution of Monogamy in Response to Partner Scarcity’. Scientific Reports 6, no. 1 (2016): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schacht, Ryan, and Kramer, Karen L.. ‘Are We Monogamous? A Review of the Evolution of Pair-bonding in Humans and its Contemporary Variation Cross-culturally’. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7 (2019): Article 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schacht, Ryan, and Kramer, Karen L.. ‘Patterns of Family Formation in Response to Sex Ratio’. PLOS ONE 11, no. 8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schacht, Ryan, Meeks, Huong, Fraser, Alison, and Smith, Ken R.. ‘Was Cinderella Just a Fairy Tale? Survival Differences between Stepchildren and Their Half-siblings’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 376, no. 1827 (2021): 20200032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sear, Rebecca, and Mace, Ruth. ‘Who Keeps Children Alive? A Review of the Effects of Kin on Child Survival’. Evolution and Human Behavior 29 (2008): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smuts, Barbara B., and Smuts, Robert W.. ‘Male Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman Primates and Other Mammals: Evidence and Theoretical Implications’. Advances in the Study of Behavior 22 (1993): 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starkweather, Katherine E. ‘Shodagor Family Strategies’. Human Nature, 28, no. 2 (2017): 138–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tovee, Martin J., Swami, Viren, Furnham, Adrian, and Mangalparsad, Roshila. ‘Changing Perceptions of Attractiveness as Observers are Exposed to a Different Culture’. Evolution and Human Behavior 27 (2006): 443–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar