Book contents
- The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
- The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Using this Lexicon
- Abbreviations
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- K
- 108. Kabbalah
- 109. Kant, Immanuel (1724–1804)
- 110. Koerbagh, Adriaan (1632–1669)
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- Q
- R
- S
- T
- U
- V
- W
- Bibliography
- Index of Cross-References
- References
109. - Kant, Immanuel (1724–1804)
from K
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 January 2025
- The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
- The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Using this Lexicon
- Abbreviations
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- K
- 108. Kabbalah
- 109. Kant, Immanuel (1724–1804)
- 110. Koerbagh, Adriaan (1632–1669)
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- Q
- R
- S
- T
- U
- V
- W
- Bibliography
- Index of Cross-References
- References
Summary
Immanuel Kant refers to Spinoza repeatedly, and almost always quite critically, in his published and unpublished writings. (Kant does praise Spinoza for his allegedly upstanding moral character. See below.) Kant’s comments on Spinoza are usually quite brief and display only superficial knowledge of his philosophy. He does not refer to specific parts of Spinoza’s works, strengthening the impression that he knew Spinoza only secondhand through the accounts of others. (This is the conclusion of Marshall 2021; Boehm 2014 argues for a more extensive engagement with Spinoza on Kant’s behalf.) For instance, Kant displays no awareness of the complexity of Spinoza’s doctrine of attributes, attributing to him merely the view that Thought and Extension are “properties [Eigenschaften]” or “predicates Prädicate]” of God (AA28:60, 1052).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon , pp. 305 - 308Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024