Book contents
- The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
- The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Using this Lexicon
- Abbreviations
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- 77. Geometrical Method
- 78. God
- 79. Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von (1749–1832)
- 80. Good and Evil
- 81. Graevius, Johannes Georgius (1632–1703)
- 82. Grotius, Hugo (1583–1645)
- H
- I
- J
- K
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- Q
- R
- S
- T
- U
- V
- W
- Bibliography
- Index of Cross-References
- References
80. - Good and Evil
from G
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 January 2025
- The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
- The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Using this Lexicon
- Abbreviations
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- 77. Geometrical Method
- 78. God
- 79. Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von (1749–1832)
- 80. Good and Evil
- 81. Graevius, Johannes Georgius (1632–1703)
- 82. Grotius, Hugo (1583–1645)
- H
- I
- J
- K
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- Q
- R
- S
- T
- U
- V
- W
- Bibliography
- Index of Cross-References
- References
Summary
Spinoza consistently maintained throughout his philosophical career that the terms “good” (bonum) and “bad” (malum) do not refer to intrinsic (non-relational), absolute features of things in the world. There are no individuals or objects or states of affairs in nature that, in and of themselves and without relationship to anything else, are good or bad. As Spinoza states in the Preface to Part Four of the Ethics, “as far as good and evil are concerned, they also indicate nothing positive in things, considered in themselves” (ii/208).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Spinoza Lexicon , pp. 211 - 217Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024