Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T09:42:33.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Ottoman armies and warfare, 1453–1603

from Part II - Government, Economic Life and Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Suraiya N. Faroqhi
Affiliation:
Istanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi
Kate Fleet
Affiliation:
Newnham College, Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Between 1453 and 1566, the Ottoman Empire reached the apogee of its military potential; during the later sixteenth century, sultans’ armies were still formidable, but not as strong as they had been. Especially after 1580, former glory started to fade away, as the long war in Hungary (1593–1606) ended with the mutual exhaustion of both Ottomans and Habsburgs and without major gains for the empire of the sultans. By contrast, the reigns of Mehmed II (r. 1451–81), Selim I (r. 1512–20) and Süleyman I (r. 1520–66) featured splendid territorial expansion, aspirations for world hegemony and an extraordinary capability to match and overcome the adversaries’ war potential. Based on accumulated wealth and power, after about 1530 the Ottomans for a while seem to have aimed at universal political supremacy and for this purpose developed a “grand strategy”, to use a currently fashionable term.

When Mehmed II acceded to the throne, there was no enemy in the vicinity who could have seriously contested his superiority. Byzantium was in a desperate situation, reduced to a city-state which would fall very soon, on 29 May 1453. Nor was it difficult to subjugate the remaining Greek principalities, partly because they were so eager to resort to Ottoman aid. Nor could the Balkan states withstand the Ottoman advance. Only Hungary, though close to the borders of the sultan’s realm, was in a somewhat stronger position: Mehmed II had not succeeded in his attack against Belgrade in 1456, and King Matthias (r. 1458–90) in 1463 had conquered the fortress town of Jajce. Thus, from an Ottoman military viewpoint, the kingdom of Hungary remained a somewhat remote target, but although in this period its ruler was quite a dangerous rival to the sultan, he mostly focused on European matters.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ágoston, Gábor, ‘Information, Ideology, and Limits of Imperial Ideology: Ottoman Grand Strategy in the Context of Ottoman–Habsburg Rivalry’, in The Early Modern Ottomans: Remapping the Empire, ed. Virginia H. Aksan and Daniel Goffman (Cambridge, 2007)Google Scholar
Kemal, İbn-i, Tevârih-i Âl-i Osman. I. Defter, ed. Şerafettin Turan (Ankara, 1991)Google Scholar
Yaşar Ocak, Ahmet, Osmanlı Toplumunda Zındıklar ve Mülhidler (15.–17. Yüzyıllar) (Istanbul, 1998)Google Scholar
Finkel, Caroline, The Administration of Warfare: The Ottoman Military Campaigns in Hungary, 1593–1606 (Vienna, 1988)Google Scholar
Murphey, Rhoads, Ottoman Warfare, 1500–1700 (London, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imber, Colin, The Ottoman Empire, 1300–1650: The Structure of Power, 2nd ed. (New York, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Pál, ‘Ottoman Warfare, 1300–1453’, in The Cambridge History of Turkey, vol. 1: Byzantium to Turkey, 1071–1453, ed. Fleet, Kate (Cambridge, 2009)Google Scholar
Aydüz, Salim, XV ve XVI Yüzyılda Tophâne-i Âmire ve Top Döküm Teknolojisi (Ankara, 2006)Google Scholar
Ercan, Yavuz, Osmanlı İmparatorluğunda Bulgarlar ve Voynuklar (Ankara, 1986)Google Scholar
Parker, Geoffrey, The Military Revolution: Military Innovation and the Rise of the West, 1500–1800 (Cambridge, 1988)Google Scholar
İnalcık, Halil, ‘Stefan Duşan’dan Osmanlı İmparatorluğuna: XV. Asırda Rumeli’de Hıristiyan Sipahiler ve Menşeleri’, in Fuad Köprülü Armağanı / Mélanges Fuad Köprülü (Istanbul, 1953)Google Scholar
Kırzıoğlu, M. Fahrettin, Osmanlılar’ın Kafkas-elleri’ni Fethi (1451–1481) (Ankara, 1993)Google Scholar
Fodor, Pál, Vállalkozásra kényszerítve. Az oszmán pénzügyigazgatás és hatalmi elit változásai a 16–17. század fordulóján (Budapest, 2006)Google Scholar
Howard, Douglas A., ‘Ottoman Administration and the Tîmâr System: Sûret-i kânûnnâme -i ‘Osmânî Berây-ı Tîmâr Dâden’, Journal of Turkish Studies – Türklük Bilgisi Araştırmaları 20 (1996), 46–124 at pp. 69–71Google Scholar
Binark, İsmet et al. (eds.), 438 Numaralı Muhâsebe-i Vilâyet-i Anadolu Ddefteri (937/1530): Dizin ve Tıpkıbasım, 2 vols. (Ankara, 1993, 1994)
Binark, İsmet et al. (eds.), 166 Numaralı Muhâsebe-i Vilâyet-i Anadolu Defteri (937/1530): Dizin ve Tıpkıbasım (Ankara, 1995)
Binark, İsmet et al. (eds.), 387 Numaralı Muhâsebe-i Vilâyet-i Karaman ve Rûm defteri (937/1530): Dizin ve Tıpkıbasım, 2 vols. (Ankara, 1996, 1997)Google Scholar
Binark, İsmet et al. (eds.), 998 Numaralı Muhâsebe-i Vilâyet-i Diyâr-i Bekr ve ‘Arab ve Zü’l-Kâdiriyye Defteri (937/1530): Dizin ve Tıpkıbasım, 2 vols. (Ankara, 1998, 1999)Google Scholar
Sarınay, Yusuf et al. (eds.), 370 numaralı muhâsebe-i Vilâyet-i Rûm İli defteri (937/1530): Dizin ve tıpkıbasım, 2 vols. (Ankara, 2001, 2002)Google Scholar
Sarınay, Yusuf et al. (eds.), 167 numaralı muhâsebe-i Vilâyet-i Rûm İli defteri (937/1530): Dizin ve tıpkıbasım, 2 vols. (Ankara, 2003, 2004)Google Scholar
The term sounds strange, but at least one contemporary chronicle refers to sırıklı cebelis: Topçular Kâtibi ‘Abdülkādir (Kadrî) Efendi Tarihi (Metin ve tahlîl), ed. Ziya Yılmazer, 2 vols. (Ankara, 2003)
Lûtfi Barkan, Ömer, ‘Timar’, in İslâm Ansiklopedisi, vol. 12, 1 (Istanbul, 1974)Google Scholar
Dávid, Géza and Fodor, Pál, ‘Az ország ügye mindenek előtt való.’ A szultáni tanács Magyarországra vonatkozó rendeletei (1544–1545, 1552). ‘Affairs of State Are Supreme’. The Orders of the Ottoman Imperial Council Pertaining to Hungary (1544–1545, 1552) (Budapest, 2005)Google Scholar
Ivanics, Mária, A Krími Kánság a tizenöt éves háborúban (Budapest, 1994)Google Scholar
Uzunçarşılı, İsmail Hakkı, Osmanlı Tarihi. II. İstanbul’un Fethinden Kanunî Sultan Süleyman’ın Ölümüne Kadar, (reprint Ankara, 1975)Google Scholar
Cezar, Mustafa, Osmanlı Tarihinde Levendler (Istanbul, 1965)Google Scholar
Faroqhi, Suraiya, Coping with the State: Political Conflict and Crime in the Ottoman Empire, 1550–1720 (Istanbul, 1995)Google Scholar
Brummett, Palmira, ‘The Fortress: Defining and Mapping the Ottoman Frontier in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries’, in The Frontiers of the Ottoman World, ed. A. C. S. Peacock (Oxford, 2009)Google Scholar
Yusuf Sarınay et al. (eds.), 367 Numaralı Muhâsebe-i Vilâyet-i Rûm İli Defteri ile 114, 390 ve 101 Numaralı İcmâl Defterleri (920–937/1514–1530). Dizin, tıpkıbasım, vols. 1 and 2 (Ankara, 2007); 367 Numaralı Muhâsebe-i Vilâyet-i Rûm İli Defteri ile 94 ve 1078 Numaralı Avlonya Livâsı Tahrir Defterleri (926–937/1520–1530) Dizin, Tıpkıbasım, vols. 3 and 4 (Ankara, 2008)
Mahmud, Seyyid Muhammed es-Seyyid, XVI. Asırda Mısır Eyâleti (Istanbul, 1990)Google Scholar
Osman Yıldırım, Hacı et al. (eds.), 7 Numaralı Mühimme Defteri (975–976/1567–1569). Özet-Transkripsiyon-İndeks. Özet–Transkripsiyon–İndeks, 4 vols. (Ankara, 1999)
Faroqhi, Suraiya, Pilgrims and Sultans: The Hajj under the Ottomans, 1517–1683 (London and New York, 1994)Google Scholar
Orhonlu, Cengiz, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun Güney Siyaseti, Habeş Eyaleti (Istanbul, 1974)Google Scholar
Káldy-Nagy, Gyula, ‘Suleimans Angriff auf Europa’, Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 28 (1973), 163–212 at pp. 170–5Google Scholar
in An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire, 1300–1914, ed. Halil İnalcık and Donald Quataert (Cambridge, 1994)
Bostan, dris, Osmanlı Bahriye Teşkilâtı: XVII. Yüzyılda Tersâne-i Âmire (Ankara, 1992)Google Scholar
Moačanin, Nenad, ‘Kapudánságok a bosnyák határvidéken a 16–18. században’, Aetas 4 (1994), 51–8 at pp. 51–5Google Scholar
Binark, İsmet et al. (eds.), 5 Numaralı Mühimme Defteri (973/1565–1566), Özet ve İndeks, Tıpkıbasım, 2 vols. (Ankara, 1994)
Rogers, Clifford J., ‘The Military Revolutions of the Hundred Years War’, in Rogers, The Military Revolution Debate, pp. 55–93 at pp. 56–7, 76–7 (originally published in 1993)
Societies, Cultures, Sciences: A Collection of Articles, ed. Mustafa Kaçar and Zeynep Durukal (Istanbul, 2006)
Imber, Colin, ‘Ibrahim Peçevi on War: A Note on the ‘European Military Revolution’’, in Frontiers of Ottoman Studies: State, Province, and the West, 2 vols., ed. Imber, Colin, Kiyotaki, Keiko and Murphey, Rhoads (London and New York, 2005)Google Scholar
The Ottoman–Habsburg Rivalry and Military Transformation’, in Crossing the Divide: Continuity and Change in Late Medieval and Early Modern Warfare, ed. David Trim and Frank Tallett (Cambridge, 2010)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×