Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:29:18.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Ideas of Nature: Natural Philosophy

from Part II - Disciplines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
John Gascoigne
Edited by
Roy Porter
Roy Porter
Affiliation:
Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, University College London
Get access

Summary

The eighteenth century inherited a long tradition deriving from Greek antiquity that maintained that Nature could be understood by the exercise of reason. This belief underlay centuries of university practice in which natural phenomena had been explained by the use of logical deduction from first principles largely, although not exclusively, derived from the philosophy of Aristotle. The long shadow cast by such an entrenched intellectual position was still evident for much of the eighteenth century in the links that remained between natural philosophy and the larger philosophical enterprise of explaining the fundamental purposes that underlay the works of God and humankind. At the beginning of the eighteenth century, natural philosophy remained a branch of philosophy along with metaphysics, logic, and moral philosophy.

But it was to be one of the striking features of the century that, as it progressed, natural philosophy more and more was loosened from such traditional moorings and began to assume an independent stance. Indeed, whereas once natural philosophy had deferred to metaphysics, natural philosophy increasingly assumed the status of the defining form of philosophy, which moral philosophy attempted to emulate and which called into question the worth of metaphysical inquiry. By 1771, for example, the Encyclopaedia Britannica could justify the study of moral philosophy on the grounds that it resembled natural philosophy in that it, too, “appealed to nature or fact; depended on observation; and built its reasonings on plain uncontroverted experiments.”

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 285 - 304
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiton, E. J., The Vortex Theory of Planetary Motions (London: Macdonald, 1972).Google Scholar
Alexander, H. G. (ed.), The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Bernard Cohen, I., Introduction to Newton’sPrincipia (Cambridge University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Bernard Cohen, I., Franklin and Newton: An Inquiry into Speculative Newtonian Experimental Science and Franklin’s Work in Electricity as an Example Thereof (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1956).Google Scholar
Brockliss, L. W. B., French Higher Education in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: A Cultural History (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Brunet, Pierre, Les physicians hollandais et la méthode expérimentale en France au XVIIIe siècle (Paris: Libraire Scientifique Albert Blanchard, 1926).Google Scholar
Brunet, Pierre, L’Introduction des théories de Newton en France au XVIIIe siècle (Paris: Librairie Scientifique Albert Blanchard, 1931).Google Scholar
Calinger, R. “The Newtonian-Wolffian Controversy (1740–59),” Journal of the History of Ideas, 30 (1969).Google Scholar
Cantor, Geoffrey, “Revelation and the Cyclical Cosmos of John Hutchinson,” in Jordanova, L. and Porter, Roy (eds.), Images of the Earth: Essays in the History of the Environmental Sciences (Chalfont St. Giles: British Society for the History of Science, Monograph Series no. 1, 1979)Google Scholar
Cantor, Geoffrey, Optics after Newton: Theories of Light in Britain and Ireland, 1704–1840 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Castel, Louis-Betrand, Le vrai système de physique generale de M. Isaac Newton, exposé et parallèle avec celui de Descartes (Paris, 1743)Google Scholar
d’Alembert, Jean, Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963).Google Scholar
Daumas, Maurice, “Precision of Measurement and Physical and Chemical Research in the Eighteenth Century,” in Crombie, A. C. (ed.), Scientific Change (London: Heinemann, 1963).Google Scholar
Dibon, Paul, La philosophie néerlandaise au siècle d’or: vol. 1, L’Enseignement philosophique dans les universités à l’epoque précartesienne, 1575–1650 (Paris: Elsevier, 1954–)Google Scholar
Ferrone, Vincenzo, The Intellectual Roots of the Italian Enlightenment: Newtonian Science, Religion, and Politics in the Early Eighteenth Century, trans. Brotherton, Sue (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International, 1995).Google Scholar
Findlen, Paula, “Sciences as a Career in Enlightenment Italy: The Strategies of Laura Bassi,” Isis, 84 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlen, , “Translating the New Science: Women and the Circulation of Knowledge in Enlightenment Italy,” Configurations, 3 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frängsmyr, Tore, “Swedish Science in the Eighteenth Century,” History of Science, 12 (1974).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gascoigne, John, Cambridge in the Age of the Enlightenment: Science, Religion and Politics from the Restoration to the French Revolution (Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillispie, Charles Coulston, Pierre-Simon Laplace 1749–1827: A Life in Exact Science (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Gravesande, Willem’s, Mathematical Elements of Natural Philosophy, Confirmed by Experiments, trans. Desaguliers, John, 2 vols. (London, 1747), 6th ed..Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. “Mathematical Physics in Eighteenth-Century France,” Isis, 77 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Robert, The Principles of Natural Philosophy … (Cambridge, 1712), preface.Google Scholar
Greene, Robert, Principles of the Philosophy of Expansive and Contractive Forces (Cambridge, 1727), prefaceGoogle Scholar
Gregory, George, A Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, 2 vols. (London, 1806–7), vol. 2.Google Scholar
Guerlac, Henry, “The Background to Dalton’s Atomic Theory,” in Guerlac, , Essays and Papers in the History of Modern Science (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2977).Google Scholar
Guerrini, Anita, “The Tory Newtonians: Gregory, Pitcairne and Their Circle,” Journal of British Studies, 25 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Roger, “New Considerations on the Physical Sciences of the Enlightenment Era,” Studies in Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 264 (1989).Google Scholar
Hall, A. R., “Newton in France: A New View,” History of Science, 13 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankins, Thomas, Jean d’Alembert, Science and the Enlightenment (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Hankins, Thomas, “The Influence of Malebranche on the Science of Mechanics during the Eighteenth Century,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 28 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankins, Thomas, Science and the Enlightenment (Cambridge University Press, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilbron, John, “Experimental Natural Philosophy,” in Rousseau, G. S. and Porter, Roy (eds.), The Ferment of Knowledge: Studies in the Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Science (Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Heilbron, John, Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries: A Study of Early Modern Physics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Heimann, P. M., “Voluntarianism and Immanence: Conceptions of Nature in Eighteenth-Century British Thought,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 39 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimann, P. M., “‘Nature is a Perpetual Worker’: Newton’s Aether and Eighteenth-century Natural Philosophy,” Ambix, 20 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimann, P. and McGuire, J. E., “Newtonian Forces and Lockean Powers: Concepts of Matter in Eighteenth-Century Thought,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 3 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyd, Michael, Between Orthodoxy and the Enlightenment: Jean-Robert Chouet and the Introduction of Cartesian Science in the Academy of Geneva (The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1982).Google Scholar
Home, Rod, “Out of a Newtonian Straitjacket: Alternative Approaches to Eighteenth-Century Physical Science,” in Studies in the Eighteenth Century, vol. IV: Papers Presented at the Fourth David Nichol Smith Memorial Seminar (Canberra: Australian National University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Home, Rod, “Leonhard Euler’s ‘Anti-Newtonian’ Theory of Light,” Annals of Science, 45 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Home, Rod, “The Notion of Experimental Physics in Early Eighteenth-Century France,” in Pitt, Joseph (ed.), Change and Progress in Modern Science (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985).Google Scholar
Home, Roderick, “Newtonianism and the Theory of the Magnet,” History of Science, 15 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iltis, C., “The Decline of Cartesianism in Mechanics,” Isis, 64 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, Margaret, The Newtonians and the English Revolution 1689–1720 (Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Kiernan, Colm, “Science and the Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century France,” Studies in Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 59 (1968).Google Scholar
Lundgren, Anders, “The Changing Role of Numbers in Eighteenth-Century Chemistry,” in Frängsmyr, Tore, Heilbron, J. L., and Rider, Robin E. (eds.), The Quantifying Spirit in the 18th Century (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Metzger, Hélène, Attraction universelle et religion naturelle chez quelques commentateurs anglais de Newton (Paris: Hermann & Cie, 1938).Google Scholar
Miller, David, “The Revival of the Physical Sciences in Britain, 1815–1840,” Osiris, 2nd series, 21 (1986).Google Scholar
Musschenbroek, Petrus, The Elements of Natural Philosophy, translated from the Latin by Colson, John (London, 1744).Google Scholar
Ruestow, Edward, Physics at Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century Leiden: Philosophy and the New Science in the University (The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Simon, “Natural Philosophy and Public Spectacle in the Eighteenth Century,” History of Science, 21 (1983)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, Charles, “Towards a Reassessment of Renaissance Aristotelianism,” History of Science, 11 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, Robert, Mechanism and Materialism: British Natural Philosophy in the Age of Reason (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Schofield, Robert, “An Evolutionary Taxonomy of Eighteenth-Century Newtonianisms,” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, 7 (1978).Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, “Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes,” Isis, 72 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, William, “Newtonian Explications of Natural Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 18 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torlais, Jean, “La Physique Expérimentale,” in Taton, René (ed.), Enseignement et diffusion des sciences en France au XVIIIe siècle (Paris: Hermann, 1964).Google Scholar
Vartanian, Aram, Diderot and Descartes: A Study of Scientific Naturalism in the Enlightenment (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, C. B., “Hutchinsonianism, Natural Philosophy and Religious Controversy in Eighteenth-century Britain,” History of Science, 18 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, Christopher, “Matter and Spirit as Natural Symbols in Eighteenth-Century Britain,” British Journal for the History of Science, 15 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Christian, Preliminary Discourse on Philosophy in General, ed. and trans. Blackwell, Richard (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×