Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:04:25.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Economics

from PART II - THE DISCIPLINES IN WESTERN EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA SINCE ABOUT 1880

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Mary Morgan
Edited by
Theodore M. Porter  and
Dorothy Ross
Theodore M. Porter
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Dorothy Ross
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Get access

Summary

Economics has always had two related faces in its Western tradition. In Adam Smith’s eighteenth century, as in John Stuart Mill’s nineteenth, these might be described as the science of political economy and the art of economic governance. The former aimed to describe the workings of the economy and to reveal its governing laws, while the latter was concerned with using that knowledge to fashion economic policy. In the twentieth century, these two aspects were more often contrasted as positive and normative economics. The continuity of these dual interests masked differences in the way economics was both constituted and practiced during the twentieth century, when these two aspects of economics became integrated in a particular way. These two wings of economics, originally a verbally expressed body of scientific lawlike doctrines and associated policy arts, in the twentieth century became more firmly joined together by the use of a set of technologies routinely and widely used within the practice of economics in both its scientific and policy domains.

In the twentieth-century history of economics, tool development and changes in economic theory need to be set alongside demands for advice generated by overwhelming events in the economic history of the times and strong economic ideologies in the political arena. These processes interacted to generate a Western technocratic economics very different in style and content from the economics of previous centuries, one we might characterize as an engineering science.

To understand twentieth-century economics as a science in the mold of engineering is to see that the economics profession came to rely on a certain precision of representation of the economic world, along with techniques of quantitative investigation and exact analysis that were alien to the experience of nineteenth-century economics, when the extent of such technologies of representation, analysis, and intervention were extremely limited.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 275 - 305
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, William R. “Economics, Economists, and Economic Policy: Modern American Experiences,” History of Political Economy, 9:1 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, R. E.Economists and the Economy, 2nd ed. (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction, 1994).Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E.A History of Modern Economic Analysis (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985).Google Scholar
Barber, William J., Designs within Disorder: Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Economists and the Shaping of American Economic Policy, 1933–1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, William J., From New Era to New Deal: Herbert Hoover, the Economists and American Economic Policy, 1921–1933 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkai, Avraham, Nazi Economics: Ideology, Theory and Policy, trans. Hadass-Vashitz, Ruth (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Blaug, Mark in “The Formalist Revolution or What Happened to Orthodox Economics after World War II,” in From Classical Economics to the Theory of the Firm: Essays in Honour of D. P. O’Brien, ed. Backhouse, Roger E. and Creedy, John (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1999).Google Scholar
Blaug’s, MarkEconomic Theory in Retrospect, 5th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Bordo, Michael D., Goldin, Claudia, and White, Eugene N., eds, The Defining Moment: The Great Depression and the American Economy in the Twentieth Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Boskin, “Symposium on Measuring the CPI,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12:1 (1998).Google Scholar
Boumans, Marcel, “Paul Ehrenfest and Jan Tinbergen: A Case of Limited Physics Transfer,” in Non-Natural Social Science: Reflections on the Enterprise of More Heat than Light, ed. Marchi, Neil (History of Political Economy, Volume 25 Supplement) (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Britain, , Maloney, John, Marshall, Orthodoxy and the Professionalisation of Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Bulmer, Martin and Bulmer, Joan, “Philanthropy and Social Science in the 1920s: Beardsley Ruml and the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial, 1922–29,” Minerva, 19:3 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson Carol, S., “The History of the United States National Income and Product Accounts: The Development of an Analytical Tool,” The Review of Income and Wealth, 21: 2 (1975).Google Scholar
Clarke, Peter, The Keynesian Revolution in the Making, 1924–1936 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. “Economics and Psychology,” in Method and Appraisal in Economics, ed. Latsis, Spiro J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Coats, A. W., ed., The Development of Economics in Western Europe since 1945 (London: Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. ed., Economists in Government (History of Political Economy, Volume 13 Supplement) (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Coats, A. W. ed., The Post-1945 Internationalization of Economics (History of Political Economy, Volume 28 Supplement) (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Collison Black, R. D., Coats, A. W., and Goodwin, Craufurd D. W., The Marginal Revolution in Economics (History of Political Economy, Supplement) (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Craver, Earlene “Patronage and the Directions of Research in Economics: The Rockefeller Foundation in Europe, 1924–1938,” Minerva, 24:2–3 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darity, William Jr., and Young, Warren, “IS-LM: An Inquest,” History of Political Economy, 27: 1 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, John, ed., New Economics and Its History (History of Political Economy, Volume 29 Supplement) (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
De Marchi, Neil, “League of Nations Economists and the Ideal of Peaceful Change in the Decade of the Thirties,” in Economics and National Security (History of Political Economy, Volume 23 Supplement), ed. Goodwin, Craufurd (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Dennis, K. G., “Competition” in the History of Economic Thought (New York: Arno, 1977).Google Scholar
Don, Lavoie, Rivalry and Central Planning: The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, eds, The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics (London: Macmillan, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B. Jr., and Hébert, Robert F., The Secret Origins of Modern Microeconomics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Epstein Roy, J., A History of Econometrics (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1987).Google Scholar
Ferguson, Eugene S.Engineering and the Mind’s Eye (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Fisher, IrvingThe Making of Index Numbers (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1922).Google Scholar
Foreman-Peck, James, A History of the World Economy (Hemel-Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf, 1995).Google Scholar
Frey, R. L. and Frey, Bruno, eds., “Is There a European Economics,” Kyklos, 48:2 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furner, Mary O. and Supple, Barry, eds., The State and Economic Knowledge: The American and British Experiences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Furner, Mary O.Advocacy and Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Science, 1865–1905 (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1975).Google Scholar
Goodwin, Craufurd D., Exhortation and Controls: The Search for a Wage-Price Policy (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1975).Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., ed., The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Hansson Bjorn, A., The Stockholm School and the Development of the Dynamic Method (London: Croom Helm, 1982).Google Scholar
Hogan, M. J.The Marshall Plan: America, Britain and the Reconstruction of Western Europe, 1947–1952 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, Kevin D.The New Classical Macroeconomics: A Sceptical Enquiry (Oxford: Blackwell, 1988).Google Scholar
Ingrao, Bruna and Israel, Giorgio, The Invisible Hand: Economic Theory in the History of Science (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Jaffé, William “Menger, Jevons and Walras De-homogenized,” Economic Inquiry, 14 (1972).Google Scholar
Jonung, Lars, ed., The Stockholm School of Economics Revisited (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Judy L. and Morgan, Mary S., The Age of Economic Measurement (History of Political Economy, Volume 33 Supplement) (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Klein, Judy L., Statistical Visions in Time (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Laidler, David, Fabricating the Keynesian Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Landreth, Harry and Colander, David C., History of Economic Thought, 3rd ed. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1994).Google Scholar
Leonard, Robert “War as a ‘Simple Economic Problem’: The Rise of an Economics of Defense,” in Economics and National Security (History of Political Economy, Volume 23 Supplement), ed. Goodwin, Craufurd (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald, Statistics in Britain, 1865–1930 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip in More Heat than Light (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip, Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. and Rutherford, Malcolm, From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism (History of Political Economy, Volume 30 Supplement) (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary S., “Competing Notions of Competition in Late-Nineteenth Century American Economics,” History of Political Economy, 25:4 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Mary S., “Searching for Causal Relations in Economic Statistics: Reflections from History,” in Causality in Crisis: The New Debate about Causal Structures, ed. McKim, Vaughn and Turner, Stephen P. (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary S., The History of Econometric Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar K.The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1963).Google Scholar
O’Brien, Ellen “How the ‘G’ got into the GNP,” in Perspectives in the History of Economic Thought: Method, Competition, Conflict and Measurement in the Twentieth Century, ed. Vaughn, Karen I. (Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1994).Google Scholar
Perlman, Mark “Political Purpose and the National Accounts,” in The Politics of Numbers, ed. Alonso, William and Starr, Paul (New York: Russell Sage, 1987).Google Scholar
Polak, Jacques J. “The IMF Model at 40,” Economic Modelling, 15:3 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Theodore M., The Rise of Statistical Thinking (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore M., Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Porter’s, Theodore M. “Rigor and Practicality: Rival Ideals of Quantification in Nineteenth-Century Economics,” in Natural Images in Economic Thought, ed. Mirowski, Philip (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Qin, Duo, The Formation of Econometrics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Ross, DorothyThe Origins of American Social Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Rutherford, Malcolm “Understanding Institutional Economics: 1918–1929,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, MalcolmInstitutions in Economics: The Old and the New Institutionalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderlin, Bo, ed., The History of Swedish Economic Thought (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar
Schabas, Margaret, “Victorian Economics and the Science of the Mind,” in Victorian Science in Context, ed. Lightman, Bernard (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Schrecker, Ellen W.No Ivory Tower: McCarthyism and the Universities (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Solow’s, Robert M. “How Did Economics Get That Way and What Way Did It Get?,” Daedalus, 129:1 (2000).Google Scholar
Spiegel, HenryThe Growth of Economic Thought, 3rd ed. (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Stigler, Stephen, The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900 (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Studenski, Paul, The Income of Nations: Theory, Measurement, and Analysis: Past and Present (New York: New York University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Tobin, James, Modigliani, Franco, and Solow, Robert in Klamer, Arjo, The New Classical Macroeconomics: Conversations with New Classical Economists and Their Opponents (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Valdes, J. G.Pinochet’s Economists: The Chicago School in Chile (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Weintraub, Roy E.Toward a History of Game Theory (History of Political Economy, Volume 24 Supplement) (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Yonay, Yuval P., The Struggle over the Soul of Economics (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Economics
  • Edited by Theodore M. Porter, University of California, Los Angeles, Dorothy Ross, The Johns Hopkins University
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Science
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521594424.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Economics
  • Edited by Theodore M. Porter, University of California, Los Angeles, Dorothy Ross, The Johns Hopkins University
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Science
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521594424.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Economics
  • Edited by Theodore M. Porter, University of California, Los Angeles, Dorothy Ross, The Johns Hopkins University
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Science
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521594424.017
Available formats
×