Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Early Greek views of poets and poetry
- 2 Language and meaning in archaic and classical Greece
- 3 Plato and poetry
- 4 Aristotle's poetics
- 5 The evolution of a theory of artistic prose
- 6 Hellenistic literary and philosophical scholarship
- 7 The growth of literature and criticism at Rome
- 8 Augustan Critics
- 9 Latin Criticism of the Early Empire
- 10 Greek Criticism of the Empire
- 11 Christianity and Criticism
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Early Greek views of poets and poetry
- 2 Language and meaning in archaic and classical Greece
- 3 Plato and poetry
- 4 Aristotle's poetics
- 5 The evolution of a theory of artistic prose
- 6 Hellenistic literary and philosophical scholarship
- 7 The growth of literature and criticism at Rome
- 8 Augustan Critics
- 9 Latin Criticism of the Early Empire
- 10 Greek Criticism of the Empire
- 11 Christianity and Criticism
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 347 - 369Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1990
References
Works, ed. and tr. et al. (The Loeb Classical Library (Co-published by William Heinemann in London and the Harvard University Press in Cambridge, Mass.)) (8 vols., London, 1913–67); ed. (in progress, 4 vols, so far, Oxford, 1972–); tr. and (4 vols., Oxford, 1905);Google Scholar
(Ars poetica = Epistles 2.3)
, ‘The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 105 (1984), 174–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 105 (1984).Google Scholar
, ‘The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 105 (1984).Google Scholar
, ‘The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 105 (1984).Google Scholar
, ‘The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 105 (1984).Google Scholar
ed. in Opera (Oxford, 1912), V, pp. 1–92; ed. and tr. in Hesiod (LCL) (London, 1936), pp. 286–597.Google Scholar
, Accent and Rhythm: Prosodic Features of Latin and Greek: A Study in Theory and Reconstruction (Cambridge, 1973).Google Scholar
, Accent and Rhythm: Prosodic Features of Latin and Greek: A Study in Theory and Reconstruction (Cambridge, 1973).Google Scholar
, Accent and Rhythm: Prosodic Features of Latin and Greek: A Study in Theory and Reconstruction (Cambridge, 1973).Google Scholar
, Accent and Rhythm: Prosodic Features of Latin and Greek: A Study in Theory and Reconstruction (Cambridge, 1973).Google Scholar
, Ethos and Education in Greek Music: The Evidence of Poetry and Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass., 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Ethos and Education in Greek Music: The Evidence of Poetry and Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass., 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Ethos and Education in Greek Music: The Evidence of Poetry and Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass., 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Ethos and Education in Greek Music: The Evidence of Poetry and Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass., 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Plato on the triviality of literature’, in and (eds.), Plato on Beauty (see below), pp. 1–28.
, ‘Plato on the triviality of literature’, in and (eds.), Plato on Beauty (see below)
, ‘Plato on the triviality of literature’, in and (eds.), Plato on Beauty (see below)
, ‘Plato on the triviality of literature’, in and (eds.), Plato on Beauty (see below)
Perihermēneias (On Style), ed. (Leipzig, 1901; rpt. Stuttgart, 1967); ed. with tr. and notes (Cambridge, 1902) (tr. also in , Poetics, etc. LCL, London 1932); tr. with notes (Toronto, 1961); tr. , in and (eds.), Ancient Literary Criticism (see above, Collections), pp. 171–215.Google Scholar
, Aristotle on Political Reasoning: A Commentary on the Rhetoric (DeKalb, Illinois, 1981).Google Scholar
, Aristotle on Political Reasoning: A Commentary on the Rhetoric (DeKalb, Illinois, 1981).Google Scholar
, Aristotle on Political Reasoning: A Commentary on the Rhetoric (DeKalb, Illinois, 1981).Google Scholar
, Aristotle on Political Reasoning: A Commentary on the Rhetoric (DeKalb, Illinois, 1981).Google Scholar
(ed.), Stoicorum veterum fragmenta (4 vols., Leipzig, 1903–24; rpt. Dubuque, Iowa, 1964–5).Google Scholar
Ars grammatica, ed. , in Grammatici Latini (see above, Collections), I, pp. 299–529.
Critical works, including the spurious Ars rhetorica, ed. and (2 vols., Leipzig, 1899–1929); tr. (LCL) (in progress, 2 vols, so far, London, 1974–); ed. and tr. (in progress, 2 vols, so far, Paris, 1978–);Google Scholar
, Literary Criticism in Antiquity: A Sketch of its Development (2 vols., Cambridge, 1934; rpt. London, 1952).Google Scholar
, ‘Epistemologie presocratique et linguistique’, Etudes ptiilosophiques (Paris, 1981).Google Scholar
, Comoedia: Die Entwicklung der Komodiendiskussion von Aristotles bis Ben Jonson (Frankfurt, 1982).Google Scholar
, Comoedia: Die Entwicklung der Komodiendiskussion von Aristotles bis Ben Jonson (Frankfurt, 1982).Google Scholar
, Comoedia: Die Entwicklung der Komodiendiskussion von Aristotles bis Ben Jonson (Frankfurt, 1982).Google Scholar
, Comoedia: Die Entwicklung der Komodiendiskussion von Aristotles bis Ben Jonson (Frankfurt, 1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Probleme der Stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik’, Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-historische Klasse, 49, 3 (Berlin, 1957).Google Scholar
, ‘Probleme der Stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik’, Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-historische Klasse, 49, 3 (Berlin, 1957).Google Scholar
, ‘Probleme der Stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik’, Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-historische Klasse, 49, 3 (Berlin, 1957).Google Scholar
, ‘Probleme der Stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik’, Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-historische Klasse, 49, 3 (Berlin, 1957).Google Scholar
, ‘Probleme der Stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik’, Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-historische Klasse, 49, 3 (Berlin, 1957).Google Scholar
, ‘Probleme der Stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik’, Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-historische Klasse, 49, 3 (Berlin, 1957).Google Scholar
, ‘ “Lies unlike the truth”: Plato on Hesiod, Theogony 27’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia) 115 (1985)Google Scholar
, ‘A theory of imitation in Plato's Republic’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 114 (1984)Google Scholar
, ‘Aristotle's concept of praxis in the Poetics’, Classical Journal, 79 (1983), 110–24Google Scholar
, ‘Plato's greatest accusation against poetry’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Suppl. vol.9 (1983), 39–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘ “Lies unlike the truth”: Plato on Hesiod, Theogony 27’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia) 115 (1985)Google Scholar
, ‘A theory of imitation in Plato's Republic’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 114 (1984), 121–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Plato's greatest accusation against poetry’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Suppl. vol.9 (1983)Google Scholar
, ‘ “Lies unlike the truth”: Plato on Hesiod, Theogony 27’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia) 115 (1985)Google Scholar
, ‘A theory of imitation in Plato's Republic’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 114 (1984)Google Scholar
, ‘Plato's greatest accusation against poetry’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Suppl. vol.9 (1983)Google Scholar
, ‘ “Lies unlike the truth”: Plato on Hesiod, Theogony 27’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia) 115 (1985)Google Scholar
, ‘A theory of imitation in Plato's Republic’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 114 (1984)Google Scholar
, ‘Plato's greatest accusation against poetry’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Suppl. vol.9 (1983)Google Scholar
, ‘Analytical categories and ethnic genres’, in (ed.), Folklore Genres (Austin, 1976), pp. 215–42Google Scholar
, Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes; I: Economic, parenté, société; II: Pouvoir, droit, religion (Paris, 1969); Indo-European Language and Society tr. (London, 1973).Google Scholar
, Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes; I: Economic, parenté, société; II: Pouvoir, droit, religion (Paris, 1969); Indo-European Language and Society tr. (London, 1973).Google Scholar
, Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes; I: Economic, parenté, société; II: Pouvoir, droit, religion (Paris, 1969); Indo-European Language and Society tr. (London, 1973).Google Scholar
, Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes; I: Economic, parenté, société; II: Pouvoir, droit, religion (Paris, 1969); Indo-European Language and Society tr. (London, 1973).Google Scholar
, ‘Die kunsttheoretischen Gedanken in Philostrats Apollonios’, Philologus, 88 (1933), 149–80, 392–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Die kunsttheoretischen Gedanken in Philostrats Apollonios’, Philologus, 88 (1933)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Le pathos dans le Traité du Sublime’, Revue des études grecques (Paris), 86 (1973), 323–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Le pathos dans le Traité du Sublime’, Revue des études grecques (Paris), 86 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Dionysius of Halicarnassus: A Study in the Development of Critical Method (Cambridge, 1939).Google Scholar
, Dionysius of Halicarnassus: A Study in the Development of Critical Method (Cambridge, 1939).Google Scholar
, Dionysius of Halicarnassus: A Study in the Development of Critical Method (Cambridge, 1939).Google Scholar
, Dionysius of Halicarnassus: A Study in the Development of Critical Method (Cambridge, 1939).Google Scholar
, Dionysius of Halicarnassus: A Study in the Development of Critical Method (Cambridge, 1939).Google Scholar
, Aelius Aristide et la sophistique dans la province d'Asie au IIe siècle de notre ère (Paris, 1923).Google Scholar
, Aelius Aristide et la sophistique dans la province d'Asie au IIe siècle de notre ère (Paris, 1923).Google Scholar
, Hamartia: Tragic Error in the Poetics of Aristotle and in Greek Tragedy (Amsterdam, 1969).Google Scholar
, Hamartia: Tragic Error in the Poetics of Aristotle and in Greek Tragedy (Amsterdam, 1969).Google Scholar
, Hamartia: Tragic Error in the Poetics of Aristotle and in Greek Tragedy (Amsterdam, 1969).Google Scholar
, Hamartia: Tragic Error in the Poetics of Aristotle and in Greek Tragedy (Amsterdam, 1969).Google Scholar
, Horace on Poetry; I: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles (Cambridge, 1963); II: Ars poetica (1971); III: Epistles, Book II (1982).Google Scholar
, Horace on Poetry; I: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles (Cambridge, 1963); II: Ars poetica (1971); III: Epistles, Book II (1982).Google Scholar
, Horace on Poetry; I: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles (Cambridge, 1963); II: Ars poetica (1971); III: Epistles, Book II (1982).Google Scholar
, Horace on Poetry; I: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles (Cambridge, 1963); II: Ars poetica (1971); III: Epistles, Book II (1982).Google Scholar
, Horace on Poetry; I: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles (Cambridge, 1963); II: Ars poetica (1971); III: Epistles, Book II (1982).Google Scholar
‘Hellenistic poetry’, in Cambridge History of Classical Literature (see above, General works), I, pp. 541–621.
‘Hellenistic poetry’, in Cambridge History of Classical Literature (see above, General works), I.
‘Hellenistic poetry’, in Cambridge History of Classical Literature (see above, General works), I.
‘Hellenistic poetry’, in Cambridge History of Classical Literature (see above, General works), I.
‘Hellenistic poetry’, in Cambridge History of Classical Literature (see above, General works), I.
, ‘The theory of imagination in classical and medieval thought’, University of Illinois Studies in Language and Literature, 12, (1927)Google Scholar
, Plato's Phaedrus: A Defense of a Philosophic Art of Writing (University, Alabama, 1980).Google Scholar
, Plato's Phaedrus: A Defense of a Philosophic Art of Writing (University, Alabama, 1980).Google Scholar
, Plato's Phaedrus: A Defense of a Philosophic Art of Writing (University, Alabama, 1980).Google Scholar
, Plato's Phaedrus: A Defense of a Philosophic Art of Writing (University, Alabama, 1980).Google Scholar
, Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth, tr. (Berkeley, 1983).Google Scholar
, Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth, tr. (Berkeley, 1983).Google Scholar
, Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth, tr. (Berkeley, 1983).Google Scholar
, Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth, tr. (Berkeley, 1983).Google Scholar
, Les choeurs dejeunesfilles en Grèce archaïque; I: Morphologie, fonction religieuse et sociale; II: Alcman (Rome, 1977).Google Scholar
, Les choeurs dejeunesfilles en Grèce archaïque; I: Morphologie, fonction religieuse et sociale; II: Alcman (Rome, 1977).Google Scholar
, Les choeurs dejeunesfilles en Grèce archaïque; I: Morphologie, fonction religieuse et sociale; II: Alcman (Rome, 1977).Google Scholar
, Les choeurs dejeunesfilles en Grèce archaïque; I: Morphologie, fonction religieuse et sociale; II: Alcman (Rome, 1977).Google Scholar
, ‘Flutes and elegiac couplets’, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London), 84 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Flutes and elegiac couplets’, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London), 84 (1964), 63–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Flutes and elegiac couplets’, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London), 84 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Flutes and elegiac couplets’, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London), 84 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The decay of eloquence at Rome in the first century’, in Of Eloquence: Studies in Ancient and Medieval Rhetoric (Ithaca, 1970), 160–95.Google Scholar
, ‘The decay of eloquence at Rome in the first century’, in Of Eloquence: Studies in Ancient and Medieval Rhetoric (Ithaca, 1970).Google Scholar
, ‘The decay of eloquence at Rome in the first century’, in Of Eloquence: Studies in Ancient and Medieval Rhetoric (Ithaca, 1970).Google Scholar
, ‘The decay of eloquence at Rome in the first century’, in Of Eloquence: Studies in Ancient and Medieval Rhetoric (Ithaca, 1970).Google Scholar
, ‘The decay of eloquence at Rome in the first century’, in Of Eloquence: Studies in Ancient and Medieval Rhetoric (Ithaca, 1970).Google Scholar
, ‘Eidos und eidolon: Das Problem des Schönen und der Kunst in Platons Dialogen’, Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg (1922 – 3)Google Scholar
, ‘Eidos und eidolon: Das Problem des Schönen und der Kunst in Platons Dialogen’, Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg (1922 – 3), 1–27.Google Scholar
, ‘Eidos und eidolon: Das Problem des Schönen und der Kunst in Platons Dialogen’, Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg (1922 – 3)Google Scholar
, ‘Eidos und eidolon: Das Problem des Schönen und der Kunst in Platons Dialogen’, Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg (1922 – 3)Google Scholar
, Dictionnaire étymologique de la languegrecque (4 vols., continuously paginated, Paris, 1968 – 80).Google Scholar
, Dictionnaire étymologique de la languegrecque (4 vols., continuously paginated, Paris, 1968 – 80).Google Scholar
, Dictionnaire étymologique de la languegrecque (4 vols., continuously paginated, Paris, 1968 – 80).Google Scholar
, Dictionnaire étymologique de la languegrecque (4 vols., continuously paginated, Paris, 1968 – 80).Google Scholar
Clouds, ed. with commentary (Warminster, 1982); Frogs, ed. with commentary (London, 1963).Google Scholar
, Christianity and Classical Culture: A Study of Thought and Action from Augustus to Augustine (London, 1944).Google Scholar
, Christianity and Classical Culture: A Study of Thought and Action from Augustus to Augustine (London, 1944).Google Scholar
, ‘Two examples of literary and rhetorical criticism in the Fathers’, Journal of Theological Studies, 25 (1924), 364–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Two examples of literary and rhetorical criticism in the Fathers’, Journal of Theological Studies, 25 (1924)Google Scholar
Commentarii in Vergilii carmina, ed. and (3 vols., Leipzig, 1881–1901); ed. et al. (in progress, 3 vols, so far, American Philological Association, 1946–).Google Scholar
Commentarii in Vergilii carmina, ed. and (3 vols., Leipzig, 1881–1901); ed. et al. (in progress, 3 vols, so far, American Philological Association, 1946–).Google Scholar
, ‘The Greekless reader and Aristotle's Rhetoric’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Greekless reader and Aristotle's Rhetoric’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65 (1979), 74–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Greekless reader and Aristotle's Rhetoric’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Greekless reader and Aristotle's Rhetoric’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Poetics of Aristotle: Its Meaning and Influence (Boston, 1923; rpt. New York, 1963).Google Scholar
, The Poetics of Aristotle: Its Meaning and Influence (Boston, 1923; rpt. New York, 1963).Google Scholar
, The Poetics of Aristotle: Its Meaning and Influence (Boston, 1923; rpt. New York, 1963).Google Scholar
, The Poetics of Aristotle: Its Meaning and Influence (Boston, 1923; rpt. New York, 1963).Google Scholar
, An Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric with Analysis, Notes, and Appendices (London, 1867; rpt. New York, 1970).Google Scholar
, An Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric with Analysis, Notes, and Appendices (London, 1867; rpt. New York, 1970).Google Scholar
, An Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric with Analysis, Notes, and Appendices (London, 1867; rpt. New York, 1970).Google Scholar
, An Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric with Analysis, Notes, and Appendices (London, 1867; rpt. New York, 1970).Google Scholar
, An Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric with Analysis, Notes, and Appendices (London, 1867; rpt. New York, 1970).Google Scholar
, The Literary Microcosm: Theories of Interpretation of the Later Neoplatonists (Leiden, 1976).Google Scholar
, The Literary Microcosm: Theories of Interpretation of the Later Neoplatonists (Leiden, 1976).Google Scholar
Cratylus, ed. and tr. (The Loeb Classical Library (Co-published by William Heinemann in London and the Harvard University Press in Cambridge, Mass.)) (London, 1937); commentary by , Platan über die Sprache (Utrecht, 1978);Google Scholar
, ‘Varroniana’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973), 3–25.Google Scholar
, ‘Varroniana’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar
, ‘Varroniana’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar
, ‘Varroniana’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar
, ‘Varroniana’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar
, ‘C. Asinius Pollio and the early history of public recitation at Rome’, Hermathtna, 86 (1955)Google Scholar
Works, ed. and (5 vols., Oxford, 1902–12).
De grammaticis et rhetoribus, ed. with commentary (3rd ed., Turin, 1968); ed. and tr. , Suetonius (LCL) (London, 1914), II, pp. 394–449;Google Scholar
De nuptiis Mercurii et Philologiae, ed. (Leipzig, 1983); tr. , , and (2 vols., New York, 1971–7); commentary by (Berkeley, 1987).Google Scholar
De oratore, ed. with commentary (3 vols., Oxford, 1888–92; rpt. Hildesheim, 1965); ed. with commentary and (in progress, Heidelberg, 1981–); ed. and tr. and (LCL) (2 vols., London, 1948).Google Scholar
De Thucydide, ed. with commentary (Palermo, 1958); tr. With commentary (Berkeley, 1975);Google Scholar
De Thucydide, ed. with commentary (Palermo, 1958); tr. With commentary (Berkeley, 1975);Google Scholar
, ‘Stoic views of poetry’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 69 (1948), 241–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Epicurean analysis of language’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 60 (1939), 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Epicurean analysis of language’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 60 (1939).Google Scholar
, ‘The Epicurean analysis of language’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 60 (1939).Google Scholar
, ‘The Epicurean analysis of language’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 60 (1939).Google Scholar
, ‘The Epicurean analysis of language’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 60 (1939).Google Scholar
, Platons Sprachphilosophie im Kratylos und in den späteren Schriften (Darmstadt, 1972).Google Scholar
, Platons Sprachphilosophie im Kratylos und in den späteren Schriften (Darmstadt, 1972).Google Scholar
, Platons Sprachphilosophie im Kratylos und in den späteren Schriften (Darmstadt, 1972).Google Scholar
, Platons Sprachphilosophie im Kratylos und in den späteren Schriften (Darmstadt, 1972).Google Scholar
, ‘La pharmacie de Platon’, in La dissémination (Paris, 1972), Dissemination, tr. (Chicago, 1981)Google Scholar
, ‘La pharmacie de Platon’, in La dissémination (Paris, 1972), Dissemination, tr. (Chicago, 1981), pp. 61–171Google Scholar
, ‘La pharmacie de Platon’, in La dissémination (Paris, 1972), Dissemination, tr. (Chicago, 1981)Google Scholar
, ‘La pharmacie de Platon’, in La dissémination (Paris, 1972), Dissemination, tr. (Chicago, 1981)Google Scholar
, ‘Idéologie et communication dans la poésie grecque archaïque’, Quaderni Urbinati, new series 9 (1981)Google Scholar
, ‘Idéologie et communication dans la poésie grecque archaïque’, Quaderni Urbinati, new series 9 (1981), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Idéologie et communication dans la poésie grecque archaïque’, Quaderni Urbinati, new series 9 (1981)Google Scholar
, ‘Idéologie et communication dans la poésie grecque archaïque’, Quaderni Urbinati, new series 9 (1981)Google Scholar
, and (eds.), Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (6th ed., 3 vols., Zurich, 1951–2; rpt. 1966).Google Scholar
fragment(s), ed. and (see above, Collections), I, pp. 139–90.
fragment(s), ed. and (see above, Collections), I
, and (eds.), Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (6th ed., 3 vols., Zurich, 1951–2; rpt. 1966).Google Scholar
Divinae institutiones, ed. (Corpus scriptorum ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, 19) (Vienna, 1890); tr. (Washington, 1964).Google Scholar
(tr.), Classical Literary Criticism (Aristotle, On the Art of Poetry; Horace, On the Art of Poetry; Longinus, On the Sublime) (Penguin, 1965).Google Scholar
, ‘The Ion. Plato's characterisation of art’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 32 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Ion. Plato's characterisation of art’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 32 (1973), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Ion. Plato's characterisation of art’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 32 (1973), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Ion. Plato's characterisation of art’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 32 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The intellectual background of Cicero's Rhetorica’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973), 95–138.Google Scholar
, ‘The intellectual background of Cicero's Rhetorica’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar
, ‘The intellectual background of Cicero's Rhetorica’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar
, ‘The intellectual background of Cicero's Rhetorica’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar
, ‘The intellectual background of Cicero's Rhetorica’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 1, 3 (1973).Google Scholar
, Die Antike Theorie der Varietas: Dynamik und Wechsel in aufund ab als Charakteristikum vom Stil und Structur (Spudasmata, 37) (Hildesheim, 1979).Google Scholar
, and , Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage (Paris, 1972); Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language, tr. (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar
, and , Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage (Paris, 1972); Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language, tr. (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar
, and , Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage (Paris, 1972); Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language, tr. (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar
, and , Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage (Paris, 1972); Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Sciences of Language, tr. (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar
, ‘Dans l'ombre des plus grands: poétes et prosateurs mal connus de l'époque augustienne’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 3 (1983), 1, 447–60.Google Scholar
, ‘Dans l'ombre des plus grands: poétes et prosateurs mal connus de l'époque augustienne’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 3 (1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Dans l'ombre des plus grands: poétes et prosateurs mal connus de l'époque augustienne’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 3 (1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Dans l'ombre des plus grands: poétes et prosateurs mal connus de l'époque augustienne’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 3 (1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Dans l'ombre des plus grands: poétes et prosateurs mal connus de l'époque augustienne’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 3 (1983).Google Scholar
Works, ed. with commentary (3rded., 2 vols., Oxford, 1891–6);
fragment(s), ed. and tr. , The Remains of Old Latin (see above, Collections), III, pp. 2–423; ed. (2 vols., Leiden, 1970).Google Scholar
fragment(s), ed. and tr. , The Remains of Old Latin (see above, Collections), II, pp. 46–156.
, ‘The genre of Theognidean poetry’, in and (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985)Google Scholar
, ‘The genre of Theognidean poetry’, in and (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985), pp. 96–111.Google Scholar
, ‘The genre of Theognidean poetry’, in and (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985), pp. 96–111.Google Scholar
, ‘The genre of Theognidean poetry’, in and (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985)Google Scholar
, The Attitude of the Early Christian Latin Writers toward Pagan Literature and Learning (Catholic University of America Patristic Studies, 82) (Washington, 1949).Google Scholar
, The Attitude of the Early Christian Latin Writers toward Pagan Literature and Learning (Catholic University of America Patristic Studies, 82) (Washington, 1949).Google Scholar
, ‘ “Imitation” in the fifth century’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 53 (1958), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The structure and date of book 10 of Plato's Republic’, Abhandlungen der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse (1972), Abhandlung 3.Google Scholar
, ‘ “Imitation” in the fifth century’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 53 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The structure and date of book 10 of Plato's Republic’, Abhandlungen der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse (1972), Abhandlung 3.Google Scholar
, ‘ “Imitation” in the fifth century’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 53 (1958), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The structure and date of book 10 of Plato's Republic’, Abhandlungen der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse (1972), Abhandlung 3.Google Scholar
, ‘ “Imitation” in the fifth century’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 53 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The structure and date of book 10 of Plato's Republic’, Abhandlungen der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse (1972), Abhandlung 3.Google Scholar
Encomium of Helen and fragment(s), ed. and (see above, Collections), III, pp. 271–307; ed. (see above, Collections), pp. 42–66; tr. , in Isocrates (LCL) (London, 1945), III, pp. 55–7; tr. , in (ed.) (see above, Collections), pp. 30–67.Google Scholar
Epinician Odes and fragment(s), ed. (2nd ed., Oxford, 1947); fragment(s), ed. and (Leipzig, 1975);Google Scholar
Epistles, ed. with commentary (London, 1896); ed. with commentary (2 vols., Cambridge, 1971–82);Google Scholar
Epistulae, ed. (Oxford, 1963); tr. (LCL) (2 vols., London, 1975); commentary by (Oxford, 1966).Google Scholar
, Aristotle's Rhetoric: Five Centuries of Philological Research (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1975).Google Scholar
, Aristotle's Rhetoric: Five Centuries of Philological Research (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1975).Google Scholar
, Aristotle's Rhetoric: Five Centuries of Philological Research (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1975).Google Scholar
, Aristotle's Rhetoric: Five Centuries of Philological Research (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1975).Google Scholar
, Aristotle's Rhetoric: Five Centuries of Philological Research (Metuchen, New Jersey, 1975).Google Scholar
, ‘Simonides, Fr. 4d and P. Oxy. 2432’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 100 (1969).Google Scholar
Works, ed. and tr. (The Loeb Classical Library (Co-published by William Heinemann in London and the Harvard University Press in Cambridge, Mass.)) (2 vols., London, 1919–21).Google Scholar
Works, ed. and tr. and (The Loeb Classical Library (Co-published by William Heinemann in London and the Harvard University Press in Cambridge, Mass.)) (12 vols., London, 1929–53).Google Scholar
Works, ed. and tr. and (The Loeb Classical Library (Co-published by William Heinemann in London and the Harvard University Press in Cambridge, Mass.)) (12 vols., London, 1929–53).Google Scholar
, ‘Imitation and decline: Rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978), 102–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Imitation and evolution: The discussion of rhetorical imitation in Cicero, De oratore 11, 87–97, and some related problems of Ciceronian theory’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘On the use of genus-terminology in Cicero's rhetorical works’, Hermes, 107 (1979), 441–58.Google Scholar
, ‘Imitation and decline: Rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Imitation and evolution: The discussion of rhetorical imitation in Cicero, De oratore 11, 87–97, and some related problems of Ciceronian theory’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Imitation and decline: Rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Imitation and evolution: The discussion of rhetorical imitation in Cicero, De oratore 11, 87–97, and some related problems of Ciceronian theory’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Imitation and decline: Rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Imitation and evolution: The discussion of rhetorical imitation in Cicero, De oratore 11, 87–97, and some related problems of Ciceronian theory’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Imitation and decline: Rhetorical theory and practice in the first century after Christ’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Imitation and evolution: The discussion of rhetorical imitation in Cicero, De oratore 11, 87–97, and some related problems of Ciceronian theory’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 73 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Theognidea and Megarian society’, in and (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985), pp. 112–58.Google Scholar
, ‘The Theognidea and Megarian society’, in and (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985)Google Scholar
, ‘The Theognidea and Megarian society’, in and (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985), pp. 112–58.Google Scholar
, ‘The Theognidea and Megarian society’, in and (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985)Google Scholar
(ed.), Le classicisme à Rome aux premiers siécles avant et après J. C. (Entretiens Hardt, 25) (Geneva, 1979).Google Scholar
(ed.), Le classicisme à Rome aux premiers siécles avant et après J. C. (Entretiens Hardt, 25) (Geneva, 1979).Google Scholar
(ed.), Le classicisme à Rome aux premiers siécles avant et après J. C. (Entretiens Hardt, 25) (Geneva, 1979).Google Scholar
(ed.), Le classicisme à Rome aux premiers siécles avant et après J. C. (Entretiens Hardt, 25) (Geneva, 1979).Google Scholar
(ed.), Le classicisme à Rome aux premiers siécles avant et après J. C. (Entretiens Hardt, 25) (Geneva, 1979).Google Scholar
, The Delphic Oracle: Its Responses and Operations, with a Catalogue of Responses (Berkeley, 1978).Google Scholar
, The Delphic Oracle: Its Responses and Operations, with a Catalogue of Responses (Berkeley, 1978).Google Scholar
, The Delphic Oracle: Its Responses and Operations, with a Catalogue of Responses (Berkeley, 1978).Google Scholar
, The Delphic Oracle: Its Responses and Operations, with a Catalogue of Responses (Berkeley, 1978).Google Scholar
, ‘The seal of Theognis’, in and (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985), pp. 82–95.Google Scholar
, ‘The seal of Theognis’, in and (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985)Google Scholar
, ‘The seal of Theognis’, in and (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985), pp. 82–95.Google Scholar
, ‘The seal of Theognis’, in and (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985)Google Scholar
, Aristotle on Emotion: A Contribution to Philosophical Psychology Rhetoric, Poetics, Politics, and Ethics (New York, 1975).Google Scholar
, Aristotle on Emotion: A Contribution to Philosophical Psychology Rhetoric, Poetics, Politics, and Ethics (New York, 1975).Google Scholar
, Aristotle on Emotion: A Contribution to Philosophical Psychology Rhetoric, Poetics, Politics, and Ethics (New York, 1975).Google Scholar
, Aristotle on Emotion: A Contribution to Philosophical Psychology Rhetoric, Poetics, Politics, and Ethics (New York, 1975).Google Scholar
, ‘Aristotle on the period (Rhet. 3.9)’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford) 32 (1982), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Aristotle on the period (Rhet. 3.9)’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford) 32 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Aristotle on the period (Rhet. 3.9)’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford) 32 (1982), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Aristotle on the period (Rhet. 3.9)’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford) 32 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The impossibility of perfection: Socrates’ criticism of Simonides' poem in the Protagoras', Review of Metaphysics, 39 (1986), 729–53.Google Scholar
, ‘The impossibility of perfection: Socrates’ criticism of Simonides' poem in the Protagoras', Review of Metaphysics, 39 (1986)Google Scholar
, ‘The impossibility of perfection: Socrates’ criticism of Simonides' poem in the Protagoras', Review of Metaphysics, 39 (1986), 729–53.Google Scholar
, ‘The impossibility of perfection: Socrates’ criticism of Simonides' poem in the Protagoras', Review of Metaphysics, 39 (1986)Google Scholar
, ‘The pattern of sound and atomistic theory in Lucretius' De rerum nature’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 62 (1941), 16–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The pattern of sound and atomistic theory in Lucretius' De rerum nature’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 62 (1941).Google Scholar
, ‘The pattern of sound and atomistic theory in Lucretius' De rerum nature’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 62 (1941).Google Scholar
, ‘The pattern of sound and atomistic theory in Lucretius' De rerum nature’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 62 (1941).Google Scholar
, ‘The pattern of sound and atomistic theory in Lucretius' De rerum nature’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 62 (1941).Google Scholar
, and (trs.), , The Poetics; Longinus, On the Sublime; Demetrius, On Style (LCL) (London, 1932).Google Scholar
, ‘Plato and the poets’, in Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermen-eutical Studies in Plato, tr. (New Haven, 1980), pp. 39–72.Google Scholar
, ‘Plato and the poets’, in Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermen-eutical Studies in Plato, tr. (New Haven, 1980)Google Scholar
, ‘Plato and the poets’, in Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermen-eutical Studies in Plato, tr. (New Haven, 1980), pp. 39–72.Google Scholar
, ‘Plato and the poets’, in Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermen-eutical Studies in Plato, tr. (New Haven, 1980)Google Scholar
, ‘Qualities of rhetorical expression in Philodemus’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 112 (1982), 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Qualities of rhetorical expression in Philodemus’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 112 (1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Qualities of rhetorical expression in Philodemus’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 112 (1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Qualities of rhetorical expression in Philodemus’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 112 (1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Qualities of rhetorical expression in Philodemus’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 112 (1982).Google Scholar
, Anthropologie de la Grèce antique (Paris, 1968); The Anthropology of Ancient Greece, tr. and (Baltimore, 1981).Google Scholar
, Anthropologie de la Grèce antique (Paris, 1968); The Anthropology of Ancient Greece, tr. and (Baltimore, 1981).Google Scholar
, Anthropologie de la Grèce antique (Paris, 1968); The Anthropology of Ancient Greece, tr. and (Baltimore, 1981).Google Scholar
, Anthropologie de la Grèce antique (Paris, 1968); The Anthropology of Ancient Greece, tr. and (Baltimore, 1981).Google Scholar
, ‘The ethos/pathos distinction in rhetorical and literary criticism’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford) 34 (1984), 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The ethos/pathos distinction in rhetorical and literary criticism’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford) 34 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The ethos/pathos distinction in rhetorical and literary criticism’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford) 34 (1984), 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The ethos/pathos distinction in rhetorical and literary criticism’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford) 34 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Plato's concept of mimesis’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 15, 2 (1975), 118–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Le problème de la tragédie’, Revue des études grecques (Paris), 61 (1948), 19–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Le problème de la tragédie’, Revue des études grecques (Paris), 61 (1948), 19–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The consequences of literacy’, in (ed.), Literacy in Traditional Societies (Cambridge, 1969), pp. 27–68.Google Scholar
, ‘The consequences of literacy’, in (ed.), Literacy in Traditional Societies (Cambridge, 1969)Google Scholar
, ‘The consequences of literacy’, in (ed.), Literacy in Traditional Societies (Cambridge, 1969), pp. 27–68.Google Scholar
, ‘The consequences of literacy’, in (ed.), Literacy in Traditional Societies (Cambridge, 1969)Google Scholar
, ‘Metathesis as an instrument in the criticism of poetry’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 89 (1958), 262–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The use of poiēma and poiēsis’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 65 (1961), 263–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Metathesis as an instrument in the criticism of poetry’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 89 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The use of poiēma and poiēsis’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 65 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Metathesis as an instrument in the criticism of poetry’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 89 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The use of poiēma and poiēsis’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 65 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Metathesis as an instrument in the criticism of poetry’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 89 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The use of poiēma and poiēsis’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 65 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Metathesis as an instrument in the criticism of poetry’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 89 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The use of poiēma and poiēsis’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 65 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Plato's view of poetry’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 29 (1918), 1–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Plato's view of poetry’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 29 (1918)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Plato's view of poetry’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 29 (1918), 1–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Plato's view of poetry’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 29 (1918)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The epic cycle and the uniqueness of Homer’, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London), 97 (1977), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The epic cycle and the uniqueness of Homer’, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London), 97 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The epic cycle and the uniqueness of Homer’, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London), 97 (1977), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The epic cycle and the uniqueness of Homer’, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London), 97 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Studies in the Philosophy of Aristotle's Rhetoric (Hermes Einzelschriften, 25) (Wiesbaden, 1972).Google Scholar
, Studies in the Philosophy of Aristotle's Rhetoric (Hermes Einzelschriften, 25) (Wiesbaden, 1972).Google Scholar
, Studies in the Philosophy of Aristotle's Rhetoric (Hermes Einzelschriften, 25) (Wiesbaden, 1972).Google Scholar
, Studies in the Philosophy of Aristotle's Rhetoric (Hermes Einzelschriften, 25) (Wiesbaden, 1972).Google Scholar
, Studies in the Philosophy of Aristotle's Rhetoric (Hermes Einzelschriften, 25) (Wiesbaden, 1972).Google Scholar
, ‘The ideas and criticism of poetry in Plato's Republic, book 10’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 19, 2 (1981), 135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The ideas and criticism of poetry in Plato's Republic, book 10’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 19, 2 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The ideas and criticism of poetry in Plato's Republic, book 10’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 19, 2 (1981), 135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The ideas and criticism of poetry in Plato's Republic, book 10’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 19, 2 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Theodorus of Gadara’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 80 (1959), 337–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Thrasymachus, Theophrastus, and Dionysius of Halicarnassus’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 73 (1952), 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Thrasymachus, Theophrastus, and Dionysius of Halicarnassus’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 73 (1952).Google Scholar
, ‘Thrasymachus, Theophrastus, and Dionysius of Halicarnassus’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 73 (1952).Google Scholar
, ‘Thrasymachus, Theophrastus, and Dionysius of Halicarnassus’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 73 (1952).Google Scholar
, ‘Thrasymachus, Theophrastus, and Dionysius of Halicarnassus’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 73 (1952).Google Scholar
, ‘Die Simonides-Interpretation in Platons Protagoras’, in Hermeneia: Festschrift Otto Regenbogen (Heidelberg, 1952), pp. 71–93; rpt. in Platonstudien (Amsterdam, 1977), pp. 23–45.Google Scholar
, ‘Enthousiasmos und logos bei Platon’, Lexis, 2 (1949), 25–46; rpt. in Platonstudien (Amsterdam, 1977), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
, ‘Zum Spiel bei Platon’, in Beispiele. Festschrift fur Eugen Fink (Heidelberg, 1954), pp. 188–221; rpt. in Platonstudien (Amsterdam, 1977), pp. 65–98.Google Scholar
, ‘Die Simonides-Interpretation in Platons Protagoras’, in Hermeneia: Festschrift Otto Regenbogen (Heidelberg, 1952), rpt. in Platonstudien (Amsterdam, 1977)Google Scholar
, ‘Enthousiasmos und logos bei Platon’, Lexis, 2 (1949), rpt. in Platonstudien (Amsterdam, 1977)Google Scholar
, ‘Zum Spiel bei Platon’, in Beispiele. Festschrift fur Eugen Fink (Heidelberg, 1954), rpt. in Platonstudien (Amsterdam, 1977)Google Scholar
, ‘Die Simonides-Interpretation in Platons Protagoras’, in Hermeneia: Festschrift Otto Regenbogen (Heidelberg, 1952), pp. 71–93; rpt. in Platonstudien (Amsterdam, 1977), pp. 23–45.Google Scholar
, ‘Enthousiasmos und logos bei Platon’, Lexis, 2 (1949), rpt. in Platonstudien (Amsterdam, 1977)Google Scholar
, ‘Zum Spiel bei Platon’, in Beispiele. Festschrift fur Eugen Fink (Heidelberg, 1954), pp. 188–221; rpt. in Platonstudien (Amsterdam, 1977), pp. 65–98.Google Scholar
, ‘Die Simonides-Interpretation in Platons Protagoras’, in Hermeneia: Festschrift Otto Regenbogen (Heidelberg, 1952), rpt. in Platonstudien (Amsterdam, 1977)Google Scholar
, ‘Enthousiasmos und logos bei Platon’, Lexis, 2 (1949), rpt. in Platonstudien (Amsterdam, 1977)Google Scholar
, ‘Zum Spiel bei Platon’, in Beispiele. Festschrift fur Eugen Fink (Heidelberg, 1954), rpt. in Platonstudien (Amsterdam, 1977)Google Scholar
, Latin Fathers and the Classics: A Study on the Apologists, Jerome, and Other Christian Writers (Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 64, 2) (Göteborg, 1958).Google Scholar
, Latin Fathers and the Classics: A Study on the Apologists, Jerome, and Other Christian Writers (Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 64, 2) (Göteborg, 1958).Google Scholar
ed. and tr. with notes (LCL) (London, 1954); ed. with commentary (Bologna, 1969).
, ‘The classification of Greek lyric poetry’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford), 5 (1955), 157–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The classification of Greek lyric poetry’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford), 5 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The classification of Greek lyric poetry’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford), 5 (1955), 157–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The classification of Greek lyric poetry’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford), 5 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Antike Theorien über Entwicklung und Verfall der Redekunst (Zetemata, 77) (Munich, 1982).Google Scholar
, Antike Theorien über Entwicklung und Verfall der Redekunst (Zetemata, 77) (Munich, 1982).Google Scholar
, Antike Theorien über Entwicklung und Verfall der Redekunst (Zetemata, 77) (Munich, 1982).Google Scholar
, Untersuchungen zur Theorie der Rhetorik bei Platon und Aristoteles (Hypomnemata, 38) (Göttingen, 1973).Google Scholar
, Untersuchungen zur Theorie der Rhetorik bei Platon und Aristoteles (Hypomnemata, 38) (Göttingen, 1973).Google Scholar
, Untersuchungen zur Theorie der Rhetorik bei Platon und Aristoteles (Hypomnemata, 38) (Göttingen, 1973).Google Scholar
, Untersuchungen zur Theorie der Rhetorik bei Platon und Aristoteles (Hypomnemata, 38) (Göttingen, 1973).Google Scholar
, Untersuchungen zur Theorie der Rhetorik bei Platon und Aristoteles (Hypomnemata, 38) (Göttingen, 1973).Google Scholar
, ‘Ancient Greek music’, in (ed.), New Oxford History of Music; I: Ancient and Oriental Music (London, 1957), pp. 336–403.Google Scholar
, ‘Ancient Greek music’, in (ed.), New Oxford History of Music; I: Ancient and Oriental Music (London, 1957)Google Scholar
, ‘Ancient Greek music’, in (ed.), New Oxford History of Music; I: Ancient and Oriental Music (London, 1957), pp. 336–403.Google Scholar
, ‘Ancient Greek music’, in (ed.), New Oxford History of Music; I: Ancient and Oriental Music (London, 1957)Google Scholar
fragment(s), ed. and (see above, Collections), I, pp. 217–46.
, ‘Ovid's Metamorphoses: carmen perpetuum, carmen deductum’, Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar, ed. , 5 (1986).Google Scholar
, ‘The collegium poetarum’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London, 23 (1976), 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The collegium poetarum’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London, 23 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The collegium poetarum’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London, 23 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The collegium poetarum’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London, 23 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The collegium poetarum’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London, 23 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Pindaric Mind: A Study of Logical Structure in Early Greek Poetry (Leiden, 1985).Google Scholar
, The Pindaric Mind: A Study of Logical Structure in Early Greek Poetry (Leiden, 1985).Google Scholar
, The Pindaric Mind: A Study of Logical Structure in Early Greek Poetry (Leiden, 1985).Google Scholar
, The Pindaric Mind: A Study of Logical Structure in Early Greek Poetry (Leiden, 1985).Google Scholar
, ‘Un critique grec dans la Rome d'Auguste’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 30, 1 (1982), 839–65.Google Scholar
, ‘Un critique grec dans la Rome d'Auguste’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 30, 1 (1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Un critique grec dans la Rome d'Auguste’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 30, 1 (1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Un critique grec dans la Rome d'Auguste’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 30, 1 (1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Un critique grec dans la Rome d'Auguste’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 30, 1 (1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Historical criticism in Aristotle's Homeric Questions’, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 79 (1979), 73–81.Google Scholar
, ‘Historical criticism in Aristotle's Homeric Questions’, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 79 (1979)Google Scholar
, ‘Historical criticism in Aristotle's Homeric Questions’, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 79 (1979), 73–81.Google Scholar
, ‘Historical criticism in Aristotle's Homeric Questions’, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 79 (1979)Google Scholar
, ‘Emotions and fictional characters’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64, 3 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Stoic logic and Alexandrian poetics’, in et al. (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism (Oxford, 1980), pp. 182–216.Google Scholar
, ‘Stoic logic and Alexandrian poetics’, in et al. (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism (Oxford, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Stoic logic and Alexandrian poetics’, in et al. (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism (Oxford, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Stoic logic and Alexandrian poetics’, in et al. (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism (Oxford, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Stoic logic and Alexandrian poetics’, in et al. (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism (Oxford, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Theophrastus and the theory of style’, Rutgers University Studies, 2 (1985), 251–67.Google Scholar
Institutio oratoria, ed. (2 vols., Oxford, 1970); ed. and tr. (7 vols., Paris, 1975–80); tr. (LCL) (4 vols., London, 1921–2).Google Scholar
Works in English, ed. and (12 vols., Oxford, 1908–52); ed. (2 vols., Princeton, 1984);
Works in English, ed. and (12 vols., Oxford, 1908–52); ed. (2 vols., Princeton, 1984);
et al. (eds.), Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker (in progress, 4 vols. so far, Leiden, 1923–77).Google Scholar
, ‘Linguistics and poetics’, in (ed.), Style in Language (Cambridge, Mass., 1960), pp. 350–77.Google Scholar
, ‘Linguistics and poetics’, in (ed.), Style in Language (Cambridge, Mass., 1960), pp. 350–77.Google Scholar
Works, ed. (5 vols., Oxford, 1903–15); ed. and tr. et al. (14 vols., Paris, 1925–56); tr. (4 vols., Oxford, 1871; rev. and , 1953); tr. (in progress, 1 vol. so far, New Haven, 1984–);
, ‘An Aristotelian trilogy: Ethics, rhetoric, politics, and the search for truth’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 13 (1980), 1–24.Google Scholar
, ‘An Aristotelian trilogy: Ethics, rhetoric, politics, and the search for truth’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 13 (1980)Google Scholar
, ‘An Aristotelian trilogy: Ethics, rhetoric, politics, and the search for truth’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 13 (1980), 1–24.Google Scholar
, ‘An Aristotelian trilogy: Ethics, rhetoric, politics, and the search for truth’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 13 (1980)Google Scholar
, ‘Aristotle's concept of metaphor in rhetoric’, in (ed.), Aristotle (see above), pp. 235–50.
, ‘Aristotle's concept of metaphor in rhetoric’, in (ed.), Aristotle (see above).
, ‘Aristotle's concept of metaphor in rhetoric’, in (ed.), Aristotle (see above).
, ‘Aristotle's concept of metaphor in rhetoric’, in (ed.), Aristotle (see above).
, ‘Aristotle's concept of metaphor in rhetoric’, in (ed.), Aristotle (see above).
, ‘Der alte Streit zwischen Philosophic und Dichtung’, Altsprachliche Unterncht, 23, 6 (1980), 6–36.Google Scholar
, ‘Der alte Streit zwischen Philosophic und Dichtung’, Altsprachliche Unterncht, 23, 6 (1980)Google Scholar
, ‘Der alte Streit zwischen Philosophic und Dichtung’, Altsprachliche Unterncht, 23, 6 (1980), 6–36.Google Scholar
, ‘Der alte Streit zwischen Philosophic und Dichtung’, Altsprachliche Unterncht, 23, 6 (1980)Google Scholar
, ‘Macrobius and Servius: Verecundia and the grammarian's function’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 84 (1981), 219–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Servius and idonei auctores’ American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 99 (1978), 181–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The grammarian's authority’, Classical Philology (Chicago), 75 (1980), 216–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Macrobius and Servius: Verecundia and the grammarian's function’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 84 (1981), 219–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Servius and idonei auctores’ American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 99 (1978), 181–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Classical Rhetoric and its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times (Chapel Hill, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Encoplius and Agamemnon in Petronius’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 99 (1978), 171–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Classical Rhetoric and its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times (Chapel Hill, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Encoplius and Agamemnon in Petronius’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 99 (1978).Google Scholar
, ‘Encoplius and Agamemnon in Petronius’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 99 (1978).Google Scholar
, ‘Encoplius and Agamemnon in Petronius’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 99 (1978).Google Scholar
, ‘Encoplius and Agamemnon in Petronius’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 99 (1978).Google Scholar
ed. (3rd ed., Leipzig, 1959);
, ‘Horazens Brief an die Pisonem’, Berichte der Sächsische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse, 88 (1936), 3–31.Google Scholar
, ‘Horazens Brief an die Pisonem’, Berichte der Sächsische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse, 88 (1936).Google Scholar
, ‘Horazens Brief an die Pisonem’, Berichte der Sächsische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse, 88 (1936).Google Scholar
, ‘Horazens Brief an die Pisonem’, Berichte der Sächsische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse, 88 (1936).Google Scholar
, ‘Horazens Brief an die Pisonem’, Berichte der Sächsische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse, 88 (1936).Google Scholar
, ‘Das kitharodische Prooimion: Eine formgeschichtliche Unter-suchung’, Philologus, 100 (1956), 159–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Das kitharodische Prooimion: Eine formgeschichtliche Unter-suchung’, Philologus, 100 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Das kitharodische Prooimion: Eine formgeschichtliche Unter-suchung’, Philologus, 100 (1956), 159–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Das kitharodische Prooimion: Eine formgeschichtliche Unter-suchung’, Philologus, 100 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The true tragedy: On the relationship between Greek tragedy and Plato’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 52 (1941), 1–40; 53 (1942), 37–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The true tragedy: On the relationship between Greek tragedy and Plato’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 52 (1941), 53 (1942)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The true tragedy: On the relationship between Greek tragedy and Plato’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 52 (1941), 1–40; 53 (1942), 37–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The true tragedy: On the relationship between Greek tragedy and Plato’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 52 (1941), 53 (1942)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition (Berkeley, 1986).Google Scholar
, Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition (Berkeley, 1986).Google Scholar
, ‘Reste frühellenistischer Poetik im Pisonembrief des Horaz, Hermes, 60 (1925), 1–13.Google Scholar
Laws, ed. with commentary (2 vols., Manchester, 1921; rpt. New York, 1975); tr. with notes (New York, 1980);Google Scholar
Laws, ed. with commentary (2 vols., Manchester, 1921; rpt. New York, 1975); tr. with notes (New York, 1980);Google Scholar
, Orationis Ratio: The Stylistic Theories and Practice of the Roman Orators, Historians, and Philosophers (2 vols., Amsterdam, 1963).Google Scholar
, Orationis Ratio: The Stylistic Theories and Practice of the Roman Orators, Historians, and Philosophers (2 vols., Amsterdam, 1963).Google Scholar
, Orationis Ratio: The Stylistic Theories and Practice of the Roman Orators, Historians, and Philosophers (2 vols., Amsterdam, 1963).Google Scholar
, Orationis Ratio: The Stylistic Theories and Practice of the Roman Orators, Historians, and Philosophers (2 vols., Amsterdam, 1963).Google Scholar
, Orationis Ratio: The Stylistic Theories and Practice of the Roman Orators, Historians, and Philosophers (2 vols., Amsterdam, 1963).Google Scholar
, ‘The topics of argumentative invention in Latin rhetorical theory from Cicero to Boethius’, Rhetorica, 1 (1983), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The topics of argumentative invention in Latin rhetorical theory from Cicero to Boethius’, Rhetorica, 1 (1983), 23–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Tōkai egō: The first person in Pindar’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 67 (1963), 177–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Tōkai egō: The first person in Pindar’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 67 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Tōkai egō: The first person in Pindar’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 67 (1963), 177–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Tōkai egō: The first person in Pindar’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 67 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Tōkai egō: The first person in Pindar’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 67 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spurious works discussed in the text: Life and Poetry of Homer, ed. , in Plutarchi moralia, (7 vols., Leipzig, 1888–96), VII (1896); ed. , Opera (Oxford, 1912), V, pp. 238–44;Google Scholar
Life of Apollonius of Tyana, ed. (Leipzig, 1870; rpt. Hildesheim, 1964); tr. (Penguin, 1970);Google Scholar
tr. ‘if not with Nestor in the Iliad, then at least with Odysseus’, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Philosophical Hermeneutics, (Berkeley, 1976).Google Scholar
Lives of the Sophists, ed. (Leipzig, 1871); rpt. Hildesheim, 1964); ed. and tr. (LCL) (London, 1922).Google Scholar
, ‘Filodemo: La Rhetorica e la Musica’, in Syzetesis: Studi offerti a Marcello Gigante (Naples, 1983), pp. 553–62.Google Scholar
, ‘Filodemo: La Rhetorica e la Musica’, in Syzetesis: Studi offerti a Marcello Gigante (Naples, 1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Filodemo: La Rhetorica e la Musica’, in Syzetesis: Studi offerti a Marcello Gigante (Naples, 1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Filodemo: La Rhetorica e la Musica’, in Syzetesis: Studi offerti a Marcello Gigante (Naples, 1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Filodemo: La Rhetorica e la Musica’, in Syzetesis: Studi offerti a Marcello Gigante (Naples, 1983).Google Scholar
Love Romances and fragment(s), ed. and tr. , in Longus, Daphnis and Chloe (LCL) (London, 1916), pp. 256–379.Google Scholar
Bibliography: (1950–57) in Lustrum, 4(1959); 5 (1960), esp. 520–54; (1958–75) in Lustrum, 20 (1977), 5–304; , Comprendre Platon: Un siècle de bibliographie platonicienne de la langue française, 1880–1980 (Paris, 1981).Google Scholar
, Tragedia greca e cultura ellenistica: I'orazione LII di Dione di Prusa (Bologna, 1983).Google Scholar
, Tragedia greca e cultura ellenistica: I'orazione LII di Dione di Prusa (Bologna, 1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Paradox in Plato's Phaedrus’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 27 (1982), 62–76.Google Scholar
, ‘Paradox in Plato's Phaedrus’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 27 (1982)Google Scholar
, ‘Paradox in Plato's Phaedrus’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 27 (1982), 62–76.Google Scholar
, ‘Paradox in Plato's Phaedrus’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 27 (1982)Google Scholar
, ‘The poet, the critic, and the moralist: Horace, Epistles 1.19’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford), 27 (1977), 359–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The poetry of ethics in Horace, Epistles 1.19’, Journal of Roman Studies (London), 69 (1979), 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The poet, the critic, and the moralist: Horace, Epistles 1.19’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford), 27 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The poetry of ethics in Horace, Epistles 1.19’, Journal of Roman Studies (London), 69 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The poet, the critic, and the moralist: Horace, Epistles 1.19’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford), 27 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The poetry of ethics in Horace, Epistles 1.19’, Journal of Roman Studies (London), 69 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The poet, the critic, and the moralist: Horace, Epistles 1.19’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford), 27 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The poetry of ethics in Horace, Epistles 1.19’, Journal of Roman Studies (London), 69 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Thucydides on faction (3.82-3)’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 205 (1979).Google Scholar
, ‘The poet, the critic, and the moralist: Horace, Epistles 1.19’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford), 27 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The poetry of ethics in Horace, Epistles 1.19’, Journal of Roman Studies (London), 69 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars (Göttingen, 1963).Google Scholar
, Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars (Göttingen, 1963).Google Scholar
, Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars (Göttingen, 1963).Google Scholar
, Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars (Göttingen, 1963).Google Scholar
, La critique littéraire de langue latine et le développement du gout archaïsant au if siècle de notre ère (Rennes, 1952).Google Scholar
, La critique littéraire de langue latine et le développement du gout archaïsant au if siècle de notre ère (Rennes, 1952).Google Scholar
, La critique littéraire de langue latine et le développement du gout archaïsant au if siècle de notre ère (Rennes, 1952).Google Scholar
, La critique littéraire de langue latine et le développement du gout archaïsant au if siècle de notre ère (Rennes, 1952).Google Scholar
, La critique littéraire de langue latine et le développement du gout archaïsant au if siècle de notre ère (Rennes, 1952).Google Scholar
, ‘Il Saggio sul Sublime: Una interessante pagina di retorice e di estetica dell'antichita’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 32, 1 (1984), 364–403.Google Scholar
, ‘Il Saggio sul Sublime: Una interessante pagina di retorice e di estetica dell'antichita’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), 32, 1 (1984), 364–403.Google Scholar
, Antike Rhetorik: Technik und Method (Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft, II, 3) (Munich, 1974).Google Scholar
, ‘Hesiod, Odysseus, and the instruction of princes’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 114 (1984), 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Hesiod, Odysseus, and the instruction of princes’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 114 (1984)Google Scholar
, ‘Hesiod, Odysseus, and the instruction of princes’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 114 (1984), 29–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Hesiod, Odysseus, and the instruction of princes’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 114 (1984)Google Scholar
, ‘Die visuelle Dimension des Theaters bei Aristoteles’, Philologus, 124 (1980), 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Die visuelle Dimension des Theaters bei Aristoteles’, Philologus, 124 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Die visuelle Dimension des Theaters bei Aristoteles’, Philologus, 124 (1980), 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Die visuelle Dimension des Theaters bei Aristoteles’, Philologus, 124 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Ancient Rhetorical Theories of Simile and Comparison (Cambridge, Mass., 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, La parole et la beauté: Rhétorique et esthétique dans la tradition occidentale (Paris, 1982).Google Scholar
, Rhétorique et philosophie chez Cicéron: Essai sur les fondements philosophiques de l'art de persuader (Paris, 1960).Google Scholar
, Rhétorique et philosophie chez Cicéron: Essai sur les fondements philosophiques de l'art de persuader (Paris, 1960).Google Scholar
, Rhétorique et philosophie chez Cicéron: Essai sur les fondements philosophiques de l'art de persuader (Paris, 1960).Google Scholar
, Rhétorique et philosophie chez Cicéron: Essai sur les fondements philosophiques de l'art de persuader (Paris, 1960).Google Scholar
, Rhétorique et philosophie chez Cicéron: Essai sur les fondements philosophiques de l'art de persuader (Paris, 1960).Google Scholar
, ‘Rhétorique et poétique: La théorie du sublime de Platon aux modernes’, Revue des Etudes Latines, 54 (1976), 278–307.Google Scholar
, ‘Rhétorique et poétique: La théorie du sublime de Platon aux modernes’, Revue des Etudes Latines, 54 (1976), 278–307.Google Scholar
, ‘Phthonos and paraphasis: Nemean 8. 19 – 34’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies (Durham, North Carolina), 23 (1982), 111–20Google Scholar
, ‘Phthonos and paraphasis: Nemean 8. 19 – 34’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies (Durham, North Carolina), 23 (1982)Google Scholar
, ‘Phthonos and paraphasis: Nemean 8. 19 – 34’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies (Durham, North Carolina), 23 (1982), 111–20.Google Scholar
, ‘Phthonos and paraphasis: Nemean 8. 19 – 34’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies (Durham, North Carolina), 23 (1982)Google Scholar
, ‘The career and conversion of Dio Chrysostom’, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London), 98 (1978).Google Scholar
(ed.), The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century: Essays (Oxford, 1963).Google Scholar
(ed.), The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century: Essays (Oxford, 1963).Google Scholar
, ‘Servius on the tropes and figures of Vergil’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 12 (1981), 157–92, 267–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Servius on the tropes and figures of Vergil’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 12 (1981), 157–92, 267–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essays, genuine and spurious, known collectively as Moralia, ed. and tr. et al. (LCL) (15 vols., London, 1927–69); ed. and tr. et al. (in progress, 4 vols, so far, Paris, 1974–);Google Scholar
, ‘Greek lyric poets’, in (ed.), Ancient Writers, Greece and Rome (2 vols., New York, 1982), 1, pp.75–98.Google Scholar
, The Measures of Praise: Structure and Function in Pindar's Second and Seventh Nemean Odes (Göttingen, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Greek lyric poets’, in (ed.), Ancient Writers, Greece and Rome (2 vols., New York, 1982), 1Google Scholar
, The Measures of Praise: Structure and Function in Pindar's Second and Seventh Nemean Odes (Göttingen, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Greek lyric poets’, in (ed.), Ancient Writers, Greece and Rome (2 vols., New York, 1982), 1, pp. 75–98.Google Scholar
, The Measures of Praise: Structure and Function in Pindar's Second and Seventh Nemean Odes (Göttingen, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Greek lyric poets’, in (ed.), Ancient Writers, Greece and Rome (2 vols., New York, 1982), 1Google Scholar
, The Measures of Praise: Structure and Function in Pindar's Second and Seventh Nemean Odes (Göttingen, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Philodemus on the Good King according to Homer’, Journal of Roman Studies (London), 55 (1965)Google Scholar
, ‘Ancient Greek praise and epic poetry’, in (ed.), Tradition in Literature: Interpretation in Context (Columbia, Missouri, 1986), pp.89–102.Google Scholar
, ‘Hesiod’, in (ed.), Ancient Writers, Greece and Rome (2 vols., New York, 1982), 1, pp. 43–72.Google Scholar
, ‘On the origins of the Greek hexameter’, in (ed.), Festschrift Oswald Szemerényi (Amsterdam, 1979), pp. 611–31.Google Scholar
, ‘Theognis of Megara: A poet's vision of his city’, in and (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985), pp. 22–81.Google Scholar
, The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar
, ‘Ancient Greek praise and epic poetry’, in (ed.), Tradition in Literature: Interpretation in Context (Columbia, Missouri, 1986).Google Scholar
, ‘On the origins of the Greek hexameter’, in (ed.), Festschrift Oswald Szemerényi (Amsterdam, 1979).Google Scholar
, ‘Theognis of Megara: A poet's vision of his city’, in and (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985).Google Scholar
, The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar
, ‘Ancient Greek praise and epic poetry’, in (ed.), Tradition in Literature: Interpretation in Context (Columbia, Missouri, 1986), pp. 89–102.Google Scholar
, ‘Hesiod’, in (ed.), Ancient Writers, Greece and Rome (2 vols., New York, 1982), pp. 43–72.Google Scholar
, ‘On the origins of the Greek hexameter’, in (ed.), Festschrift Oswald Szemerényi (Amsterdam, 1979), pp. 611–31.Google Scholar
, ‘Theognis of Megara: A poet's vision of his city’, in and (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985). pp. 22–81.Google Scholar
, The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar
, ‘Ancient Greek praise and epic poetry’, in (ed.), Tradition in Literature: Interpretation in Context (Columbia, Missouri, 1986).Google Scholar
, ‘On the origins of the Greek hexameter’, in (ed.), Festschrift Oswald Szemerényi (Amsterdam, 1979).Google Scholar
, ‘Theognis of Megara: A poet's vision of his city’, in and (eds.), Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis (Baltimore, 1985).Google Scholar
, The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry (Baltimore, 1979).Google Scholar
, ‘Plato on imitation and poetry in Republic 10’, in and (eds.), Plato on Beauty (see above), pp. 47–78.
, ‘Plato on imitation and poetry in Republic 10’, in and (eds.), Plato on Beauty (see above).
, ‘Plato on imitation and poetry in Republic 10’, in and (eds.), Plato on Beauty (see above), pp. 47–78.
, ‘Plato on imitation and poetry in Republic 10’, in and (eds.), Plato on Beauty (see above).
, Die Poetik des Aristoteles. Textstruktur und Textbedeutung; I: Interpretationen; II: Analysen (Frankfurt, 1980).Google Scholar
, Die Poetik des Aristoteles. Textstruktur und Textbedeutung; I: Interpretationen; II: Analysen (Frankfurt, 1980).Google Scholar
, Die Poetik des Aristoteles. Textstruktur und Textbedeutung; I: Interpretationen; II: Analysen (Frankfurt, 1980).Google Scholar
, Die Poetik des Aristoteles. Textstruktur und Textbedeutung; I: Interpretationen; II: Analysen (Frankfurt, 1980).Google Scholar
Noctes Atticae, ed. (2 vols., Oxford, 1968); ed. and tr. (LCL) (3 vols., London, 1946).Google Scholar
, ‘Die Composition und Litteraturgattung der Horazischen Epistula ad Pisones’, Hermes, 40 (1905), 481–528.Google Scholar
, ‘Die Composition und Litteraturgattung der Horazischen Epistula ad Pisones’, Hermes, 40 (1905).Google Scholar
, ‘Die Composition und Litteraturgattung der Horazischen Epistula ad Pisones’, Hermes, 40 (1905).Google Scholar
, ‘Die Composition und Litteraturgattung der Horazischen Epistula ad Pisones’, Hermes, 40 (1905).Google Scholar
, ‘Die Composition und Litteraturgattung der Horazischen Epistula ad Pisones’, Hermes, 40 (1905).Google Scholar
, The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy (Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar
, The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy (Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar
, The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy (Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar
, The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy (Cambridge, 1986).Google Scholar
Odes, ed. with commentary, (London, 1980); Books 1–2, ed. with commentary and (2 vols., Oxford, 1970–8);Google Scholar
On the Cave of the Nymphs, ed. and tr. 609, Arethusa, Monograph 1 (Buffalo, 1969); ed. with commentary (Milan, 1986); tr. (Barrytown, New York, 1983).Google Scholar
Orationes, ed. and tr. (LCL) (4 vols., in progress, London, 1973–); Or. 2–4, ed. and (2 vols.; Leiden, 1976–8); Or. 45, ed. (Berlin, 1898).Google Scholar
Orationes, ed. (2 vols., Berlin, 1893–6); ed. (2 vols., Leipzig, 1916–19); ed. and tr. and (LCL) (5 vols., London, 1932–51).Google Scholar
Orationes, ed. and tr. and (LCL) (3 vols., London, 1928–45); ed. and tr. and (4 vols., Paris, 1956–62).Google Scholar
fragment(s), ed. , in Poetae melici Graeci (see above, Collections), pp. 1–91.
, The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Mdman Parry, ed. (Oxford, 1971).Google Scholar
, The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Mdman Parry, ed. (Oxford, 1971).Google Scholar
, The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Mdman Parry, ed. (Oxford, 1971).Google Scholar
, The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Mdman Parry, ed. (Oxford, 1971).Google Scholar
, ‘Callimachus. Victoria Berenicis’, ZeitschriftfirPapyrologuundEpigraphik, 25 (1977).Google Scholar
, ‘Plato's banishment of poetry’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 28 (1970), 209–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Plato's banishment of poetry’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 28 (1970), 209–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plays, ed. and tr. (The Loeb Classical Library (Co-published by William Heinemann in London and the Harvard University Press in Cambridge, Mass.)) (5 vols., London, 1916–38).Google Scholar
, ‘Porphyre, exégète d'Homère’, in (ed.), Porphyre: huit exposés (Entretiens Hardt, 12) (Geneva, 1966), 231–66.Google Scholar
, ‘Porphyre, exégète d'Homère’, in (ed.), Porphyre: huit exposés (Entretiens Hardt, 12) (Geneva, 1966), 231–66.Google Scholar
Peri poiēmatōn (On Poems), ed. and tr. , Ricerche suipapiri ercolanesi, 1–2 (1969–71); Book 5, ed. and tr. (Berlin, 1923; rpt. Zurich, 1973);Google Scholar
Peri schēmatōn (On Figures), ed. , Rhetores Graeci (see above, Collections), III, pp. 11–40.
, History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age (Oxford, 1968).Google Scholar
, Classical Scholarship. See above, General works on classical criticism.
, Classical Scholarship. See above, General works.
, Classical Scholarship. See above, General works on classical criticism.
, Classical Scholarship. See above, General works.
, Classical Scholarship. See above, General works on classical criticism.
, Classical Scholarship. See above, General works on classical criticism.
, Classical Scholarship. See above, General works.
, Classical Scholarship. See above, General works.
, Classical Scholarship. See above, General works.
, Classical Scholarship. See above, General works.
, Classical Scholarship. See above, General works.
Poetics, ed. and tr. (LCL) (London, 1932); ed. (Oxford, 1968); ed. with commentary (Oxford, 1968); ed. and tr. and , with preface by (Paris, 1980); tr. (Oxford, 1920); tr. with commentary and (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1968; rpt. Tallahassee, Florida, 1981); tr. (New York, 1982); tr. with commentary (London, 1987); tr. (Indianapolis, 1987); tr. , in and (eds.), Ancient Literary Criticism (see above, Collections), pp. 85–132;Google Scholar
, Die Lehre von den drei Wortfügungsarten: Untersuchungen zu Dionysius von Halicarnassus, De compositione verborum (Tübingen, 1968).Google Scholar
, Die Lehre von den drei Wortfügungsarten: Untersuchungen zu Dionysius von Halicarnassus, De compositione verborum (Tübingen, 1968).Google Scholar
, Die Lehre von den drei Wortfügungsarten: Untersuchungen zu Dionysius von Halicarnassus, De compositione verborum (Tübingen, 1968).Google Scholar
, Die Lehre von den drei Wortfügungsarten: Untersuchungen zu Dionysius von Halicarnassus, De compositione verborum (Tübingen, 1968).Google Scholar
, Die Lehre von den drei Wortfügungsarten: Untersuchungen zu Dionysius von Halicarnassus, De compositione verborum (Tübingen, 1968).Google Scholar
Prolegomena (to Platonic philosophy), ed. , in Platonis dialogi (6 vols., Leipzig, 1877–99), VI (1884), pp. 196–222; ed. and tr. (Amsterdam, 1962); (to Aristotelian logic), ed. , Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca (Berlin, 1902), XII, 1, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
, Odysseus Polytropos: Intertextual Readings in the Odyssey and the Iliad (Ithaca, 1987).Google Scholar
, Odysseus Polytropos: Intertextual Readings in the Odyssey and the Iliad (Ithaca, 1987).Google Scholar
, Odysseus Polytropos: Intertextual Readings in the Odyssey and the Iliad (Ithaca, 1987).Google Scholar
, Odysseus Polytropos: Intertextual Readings in the Odyssey and the Iliad (Ithaca, 1987).Google Scholar
, ‘The poet and his audience in the Augustan age’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 1 (1982), 76–180.Google Scholar
, ‘The poet and his audience in the Augustan age’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 1 (1982).Google Scholar
, ‘The poet and his audience in the Augustan age’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 1 (1982).Google Scholar
, ‘The poet and his audience in the Augustan age’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 1 (1982).Google Scholar
, ‘The poet and his audience in the Augustan age’, Aufstieg and Niedergang der römischen Welt. Geschichte und Kultur Roms in Spiegel der neueren Forschung (Berlin), II, 30, 1 (1982).Google Scholar
Works, ed. and tr. (The Loeb Classical Library (Co-published by William Heinemann in London and the Harvard University Press in Cambridge, Mass.)) (4 vols., London, 1933–49).Google Scholar
(ed.), ‘Artium scriptores (Reste der voraristotelischen Rhetorik)’, Oesterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse, Sitzungsberichte 227, 3 (Vienna, 1951).Google Scholar
, Epigrammund Skolion: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der alexandrinischen Dichtung (Giessen, 1893).Google Scholar
, Epigrammund Skolion: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der alexandrinischen Dichtung (Giessen, 1893).Google Scholar
, Epigrammund Skolion: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der alexandrinischen Dichtung (Giessen, 1893).Google Scholar
, Epigrammund Skolion: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der alexandrinischen Dichtung (Giessen, 1893).Google Scholar
Republic, ed. with commentary (2 vols., Cambridge, 1902; 2nd ed. rev. , 1963); tr. (New York, 1968); tr. (Indianapolis, 1974);Google Scholar
Commentaries on Plato's Republic, ed. (Leipzig, 1899); tr. (Paris, 1970); on Plato's Timaeus, ed. (Leipzig, 1903); tr. (4 vols., Paris, 1966–8).Google Scholar
Republic, ed. with commentary (2 vols., Cambridge, 1902; 2nd ed. rev. , 1963); tr. (New York, 1968); tr. (Indianapolis, 1974);Google Scholar
, and , Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature (2nd ed., Oxford, 1978).Google Scholar
, and , Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature (2nd ed., Oxford, 1978).Google Scholar
Rhetoric, ed. with commentary and (3 vols., Cambridge, 1877); ed. and tr. (LCL) (London, 1926); ed. (Oxford, 1959); ed. (Berlin, 1976); Commentary on Book I, (New York, 1980); tr., with notes, (New York, 1991).Google Scholar
Rhetorica, ed. (2 vols., Leipzig, 1892); tr. , Transactions ofthe Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 23 (1920), 243–382; Books 1–2, ed. and tr. , Ricerche sui papiri ercolanesi, 3 (1977); Book 5, ed. and tr. , Cronica ercolanesia, 10 (1980), 55–124;Google Scholar
, ‘Literary criticism in the exegetical scholia to the Iliad’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford), 30 (1980), 265–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Literary criticism in the exegetical scholia to the Iliad’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford), 30 (1980), 265–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘On ancient and medieval semantics and metaphysics: Plato's semantics in his critical period’, Vivarium, 19 (1981), 81–125; 20 (1982), 97–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘On ancient and medieval semantics and metaphysics: Plato's semantics in his critical period’, Vivarium, 19(1981), 20 (1982).Google Scholar
, ‘On ancient and medieval semantics and metaphysics: Plato's semantics in his critical period’, Vivarium, 19 (1981), 81–125; 20 (1982), 97–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘On ancient and medieval semantics and metaphysics: Plato's semantics in his critical period’, Vivarium, 19(1981), 20 (1982).Google Scholar
, Psyche: Seelencult und Unsterblichkeitsglaube der Griechen (2 vols., Freiburg 1898); Psyche, tr. (New York, 1925; rpt. 1966).Google Scholar
, Psyche: Seelencult und Unsterblichkeitsglaube der Griechen (2 vols., Freiburg 1898); Psyche, tr. (New York, 1925; rpt. 1966).Google Scholar
, Psyche: Seelencult und Unsterblichkeitsglaube der Griechen (2 vols., Freiburg 1898); Psyche, tr. (New York, 1925; rpt. 1966).Google Scholar
, Psyche: Seelencult und Unsterblichkeitsglaube der Griechen (2 vols., Freiburg 1898); Psyche, tr. (New York, 1925; rpt. 1966).Google Scholar
De poetis, ed. with commentary, (Turin, 1944); ed. and tr. , Suetonius (see above), pp. 450–507.Google Scholar
, Allegory. See above, General works.
, Allegory. See above, General works.
, Allegory. See above, General works.
, Allegory. See above, General works.
, Allegory. See above, General works.
, Allegory, See above, General works.
, Allegory, See above, General works.
fragment(s), ed. , Abhandlungen der königlichen bayerischen Akademie der Wissen-schaften, Philosophisch–philologische Klasse, 17 (1886).Google Scholar
, ‘Elegiac and elegos’, California Studies in Classical Antiquity, 1 (1968), 217–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Elegiac and elegos’, California Studies in Classical Antiquity, 1 (1968), 217–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Dichter und Gruppe: Eine Untersuchung zu den Bedingung und zur historischen Funktion früher Lyrik am Beispiel Alkaios (Munich, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Die Entdeckung der Fiktionalität in der Antike’, Poetica (Munich), 12 (1980), 283–319.Google Scholar
, Dichter und Gruppe: Eine Untersuchung zu den Bedingung und zur historischen Funktion früher Lyrik am Beispiel Alkaios (Munich, 1980).Google Scholar
, Dichter und Gruppe: Eine Untersuchung zu den Bedingung und zur historischen Funktion früher Lyrik am Beispiel Alkaios (Munich, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘Die Entdeckung der Fiktionalität in der Antike’, Poetica (Munich), 12 (1980), 283–319.Google Scholar
, Dichter und Gruppe: Eine Untersuchung zu den Bedingung und zur historischen Funktion früher Lyrik am Beispiel Alkaios (Munich, 1980).Google Scholar
, ‘I generi letterari e le loro leggi scritte e non scritte nelle letterature classiche’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 18 (London, 1971).Google Scholar
, ‘I generi letterari e le loro leggi scritte e non scritte nelle letterature classiche’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 18 (London, 1971), 69–94.Google Scholar
, ‘I generi letterari e le loro leggi scritte e non scritte nelle letterature classiche’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 18 (London, 1971).Google Scholar
, ‘I generi letterari e le loro leggi scritte e non scritte nelle letterature classiche’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 18 (London, 1971). 69–94.Google Scholar
, and (eds.), Ancient Literary Criticism: The Principal Texts in New Translations (Oxford, 1972).Google Scholar
Satires and Epistles, tr. (Penguin, 1979); tr. of Epistles 2.1, 2.3 (Ars poetica) and Satires 1.4, 1.10, in and (eds.), Ancient Literary Criticism (see above, Collections), pp. 266–91.Google Scholar
Peri hupseōs (On Sublimity), ed. and tr. with commentary (Cambridge, 1907); ed. with commentary (Oxford, 1964); tr. (Oxford, 1965), rev. in and (eds.), Ancient Literary Criticism (see above, Collections), pp. 462–503; Boileau's tr. (1674), ed. (Paris, 1942).Google Scholar
Ion, ed. with notes (Cambridge, 1912; rpt. 1956); tr. in and (eds.), Ancient Literary Criticism (see above, Collections), pp. 39–50;Google Scholar
ed. (Oxford, 1939); tr. (Indianapolis, 1967); tr. , in and (eds.), Ancient Literary Criticism (see above, Collections), pp. 432–59.Google Scholar
, and (eds.), Ancient Literary Criticism: The Principal Texts in New Translations (Oxford, 1972).Google Scholar
, ‘De imitatione’, in and (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature (Cambridge, 1979), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
, ‘De imitatione’, in and (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature (Cambridge, 1979).Google Scholar
, ‘De imitatione’, in and (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature (Cambridge, 1979).Google Scholar
, ‘De imitatione’, in and (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature (Cambridge, 1979).Google Scholar
Satires and Epistles, tr. (Penguin, 1979); tr. of Epistles 2.1, 2.3 (Ars poetica) and Satires 1.4, 1.10, in and (eds.), Ancient Literary Criticism (see above, Collections).Google Scholar
, ‘De imitatione’, in and (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature (Cambridge, 1979).Google Scholar
ed. (Oxford, 1939); tr. (Indianapolis, 1967); tr. , in and (eds.), Ancient Literary Criticism (see above, Collections).Google Scholar
, ‘Plato's Gorgias and Phaedrus and Aristotle's theory of rhetoric: A speculative account’, Athenaeum, 57 (1979).Google Scholar
, ‘Plato's Gorgias and Phaedrus and Aristotle's theory of rhetoric: A speculative account’, Athenaeum, 57 (1979), 452–61.Google Scholar
, ‘Plato's Gorgias and Phaedrus and Aristotle's theory of rhetoric: A speculative account’, Athenaeum, 57 (1979).Google Scholar
, ‘Plato's Gorgias and Phaedrus and Aristotle's theory of rhetoric: A speculative account’, Athenaeum, 57 (1979), 452–61.Google Scholar
Plays, ed. with commentary, (2nd ed., New York, 1908); ed. and tr. (The Loeb Classical Library (Co-published by William Heinemann in London and the Harvard University Press in Cambridge, Mass.)) (2 vols., London, 1912).Google Scholar
, The Classical Theory of Composition from its Origins to the Present: A Historical Survey (Chapel Hill, 1972).Google Scholar
, La question platonicienne: Etude sur les rapports de lapensée et de l'expression dans les dialogues (2nd ed., Neuchâtel, 1969).Google Scholar
, La question platonicienne: Etude sur les rapports de lapensée et de l'expression dans les dialogues (2nd ed., Neuchâtel, 1969).Google Scholar
, La question platonicienne: Etude sur les rapports de lapensée et de l'expression dans les dialogues (2nd ed., Neuchâtel, 1969).Google Scholar
, La question platonicienne: Etude sur les rapports de lapensée et de l'expression dans les dialogues (2nd ed., Neuchâtel, 1969).Google Scholar
, ‘The bee maidens of the Homeric Hymn to Hermes’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 83(1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The bee maidens of the Homeric Hymn to Hermes’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 83(1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The bee maidens of the Homeric Hymn to Hermes’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 83(1979), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The bee maidens of the Homeric Hymn to Hermes’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 83(1979), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The structure of Plutarch's De audiendis poetis’ Mnemosyne, 35 (1982), 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The structure of Plutarch's De audiendis poetis’ Mnemosyne, 35 (1982), 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Alexandros Numeniu Peri schēmatōn in seiner Verhältnis zu Kaikilios, Tiberios, und seiner späterer Benutzern (Paderborn, 1916).Google Scholar
, Alexandros Numeniu Peri schēmatōn in seiner Verhältnis zu Kaikilios, Tiberios, und seiner späterer Benutzern (Paderborn, 1916).Google Scholar
, ‘Gorgias and the psychology of the logos’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 66 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Gorgias and the psychology of the logos’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 66 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Gorgias and the psychology of the logos’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 66 (1962), 99–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Gorgias and the psychology of the logos’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (Cambridge, Mass.), 66 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Studies on the Fifth and Sixth Essays of Proclus' Commentary on the Republic (Hypomnemata, 61) (Göttingen, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Studies on the Fifth and Sixth Essays of Proclus' Commentary on the Republic (Hypomnemata, 61) (Göttingen, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Phusis, Meletē, Epistēmē’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 40 (1909), 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Phusis, Meletē, Epistēmē’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 40 (1909).Google Scholar
, ‘Phusis, Meletē, Epistēmē’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 40 (1909).Google Scholar
, ‘Phusis, Meletē, Epistēmē’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 40 (1909).Google Scholar
, ‘Phusis, Meletē, Epistēmē’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 40 (1909).Google Scholar
, ‘Lyric narrative: Structure and principle’, in et al. (eds.), Studies in Classical Lyric: A Homage to Elroy Bundy (Classical Antiquity, 2) (Berkeley, 1983), 117–32.Google Scholar
, ‘Lyric narrative: Structure and principle’, in et al. (eds.), Studies in Classical Lyric: A Homage to Elroy Bundy (Classical Antiquity, 2) (Berkeley, 1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Lyric narrative: Structure and principle’, in et al. (eds.), Studies in Classical Lyric: A Homage to Elroy Bundy (Classical Antiquity, 2) (Berkeley, 1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Lyric narrative: Structure and principle’, in et al. (eds.), Studies in Classical Lyric: A Homage to Elroy Bundy (Classical Antiquity, 2) (Berkeley, 1983), pp. 117–32.Google Scholar
, ‘Aristophanes of Byzantium on the Pinakes of Callimachus’, Phoenix, 30 (1976), 234–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Aristophanes of Byzantium on the Pinakes of Callimachus’, Phoenix, 30 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Aristophanes of Byzantium on the Pinakes of Callimachus’, Phoenix, 30 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Aristophanes of Byzantium on the Pinakes of Callimachus’, Phoenix, 30 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Aristophanes of Byzantium on the Pinakes of Callimachus’, Phoenix, 30 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The moral view of Aristotle's Poetics’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 44(1983), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The moral view of Aristotle's Poetics’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 44(1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The moral view of Aristotle's Poetics’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 44(1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The moral view of Aristotle's Poetics’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 44(1983), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Dark Age of Greece: An Archaeological Survey of the Eleventh to the Eighth Centuries (Edinburgh, 1971).Google Scholar
, The Dark Age of Greece: An Archaeological Survey of the Eleventh to the Eighth Centuries (Edinburgh, 1971).Google Scholar
, The Dark Age of Greece: An Archaeological Survey of the Eleventh to the Eighth Centuries (Edinburgh, 1971).Google Scholar
, The Dark Age of Greece: An Archaeological Survey of the Eleventh to the Eighth Centuries (Edinburgh, 1971).Google Scholar
, ‘The Aristotelian tradition in ancient rhetoric’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 62 (1941), 35–50, 169–90; rpt. in (ed.), Classical Heritage, (see above), pp. 278–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Aristotelian tradition in ancient rhetoric’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 62 (1941); rpt. in (ed.), Classical Heritage, (see above).Google Scholar
, ‘The Aristotelian tradition in ancient rhetoric’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 62 (1941); rpt. in (ed.), Classical Heritage, (see above).Google Scholar
, ‘The Aristotelian tradition in ancient rhetoric’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 62 (1941); rpt. in (ed.), Classical Heritage, (see above).Google Scholar
, ‘The Aristotelian tradition in ancient rhetoric’, American Journal of Philology (Baltimore), 62 (1941); rpt. in (ed.), Classical Heritage, (see above).Google Scholar
(ed.), The Older Sophists: A Complete Translation by Several Hands (Columbia, South Carolina, 1972).Google Scholar
, Studien zur Ars poetica des Horaz; Interpretation des auf Dichtkunst und Gedicht bezüglichen Hauptteiles, Verse 1–294 (Würzburg, 1939).Google Scholar
, Studien zur Ars poetica des Horaz; Interpretation des auf Dichtkunst und Gedicht bezüglichen Hauptteiles, Verse 1–294 (Würzburg, 1939).Google Scholar
, Studien zur Ars poetica des Horaz; Interpretation des auf Dichtkunst und Gedicht bezüglichen Hauptteiles, Verse 1–294 (Würzburg, 1939).Google Scholar
, Studien zur Ars poetica des Horaz; Interpretation des auf Dichtkunst und Gedicht bezüglichen Hauptteiles, Verse 1–294 (Würzburg, 1939).Google Scholar
, Studien zur Ars poetica des Horaz; Interpretation des auf Dichtkunst und Gedicht bezüglichen Hauptteiles, Verse 1–294 (Würzburg, 1939).Google Scholar
, ‘Plato and the art of his time’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford) 27 (1933), 149–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Plato and the art of his time’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford) 27 (1933), 149–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Hamartia in Aristotle and Greek tragedy’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford), 25 (1975), 221–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Hamartia in Aristotle and Greek tragedy’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford), 25 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Hamartia in Aristotle and Greek tragedy’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford), 25 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Hamartia in Aristotle and Greek tragedy’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford), 25 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stromata, ed. and (Berlin, 1960); tr. , Ante-Nicene Christian Library (4 vols, published as 2 vols., Edinburgh, 1867), IV.Google Scholar
Hypomnematikon, in (ed.) (see above), II, pp. 196–303;
, ‘Petronius, Seneca, and Lucan: A literary feud’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 99 (1968). 453–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Petronius, Seneca, and Lucan: A literary feud’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 99 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Petronius, Seneca, and Lucan: A literary feud’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 99 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Petronius, Seneca, and Lucan: A literary feud’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 99 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Petronius, Seneca, and Lucan: A literary feud’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 99 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘La découpe du poème: Notes sur les origines sacrificielles de la poétique grecque’, Poétique, 58 (1984), 215–32.Google Scholar
, La parole et le marbre: Aux origines de la poétique grecque (Lund, 1976; rev. Italian ed., Turin, 1984).Google Scholar
, ‘La découpe du poème: Notes sur les origines sacrificielles de la poétique grecque’, Poétique, 58 (1984).Google Scholar
, La parole et le marbre: Aux origines de la poétique grecque (Lund, 1976; rev. Italian ed., Turin, 1984).Google Scholar
, ‘La découpe du poème: Notes sur les origines sacrificielles de la poétique grecque’, Poétique, 58 (1984).Google Scholar
, La parole et le marbre: Aux origines de la poétique grecque (Lund, 1976; rev. Italian ed., Turin, 1984).Google Scholar
, ‘La découpe du poème: Notes sur les origines sacrificielles de la poétique grecque’, Poétique, 58 (1984).Google Scholar
, La parole et le marbre: Aux origines de la poétique grecque (Lund, 1976; rev. Italian ed., Turin, 1984).Google Scholar
, ‘Les idées esthétiques de Plutarque’, Annuaire de I'Institut de Philologie et d'Histoire Orientals, 2 (Brussels, 1934) (Mélanges Bidez), 917–46.Google Scholar
, ‘Les idées esthétiques de Plutarque’, Annuaire de I'Institut de Philologie et d'Histoire Orientals, 2 (Brussels, 1934) (Mélanges Bidez), 917–46.Google Scholar
, ‘A performative approach to ritual’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 65(1981), 113–69.Google Scholar
‘Plato and allegorical interpretation’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford) 23 (1929), 142–54; 24 (1930), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Plato and allegorical interpretation’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford) 23 (1929); 24 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Plato and allegorical interpretation’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford) 23 (1929); 24 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Plato and allegorical interpretation’, Classical Quarterly (Oxford) 23 (1929); 24 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Cambridge History of Classical Literature; I: Greek Literature, ed. and (Cambridge, 1985); II. Latin Literature, ed. and (Cambridge, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy, ed. (Cambridge, 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy, ed. (Cambridge, 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theogonia, Opera et dies, Scutum, Fragmenta selecta, ed. , , and (2nd ed., Oxford, 1983);Google Scholar
To the Young on How They Should Read Greek Writings, ed. and tr. (Paris, 1935; rpt. 1965); ed. (London, 1975).Google Scholar
, Muses of One Mind: The Literary Analysis of Experience and its Continuity (Princeton, 1983).Google Scholar
, Muses of One Mind: The Literary Analysis of Experience and its Continuity (Princeton, 1983).Google Scholar
, Muses of One Mind: The Literary Analysis of Experience and its Continuity (Princeton, 1983).Google Scholar
, Muses of One Mind: The Literary Analysis of Experience and its Continuity (Princeton, 1983).Google Scholar
, Contributi alla storia della critica letteraria in Graecia; I: La critica letteraria di Dione Crisistomo (Bologna, 1912).Google Scholar
, Contributi alla storia della critica letteraria in Graecia; I: La critica letteraria di Dione Crisistomo (Bologna, 1912).Google Scholar
, The Metaphorical Terminology of Greek Rhetoric and Literary Criticism (Chicago, 1905).Google Scholar
, ‘The principles of Greek literary criticism’, Mnemosyne new series 4, 36 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Mimesis: Plato's Doctrine of Artistic Imitation and its Meaning to Us (Leiden, 1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Mimesis: Plato's Doctrine of Artistic Imitation and its Meaning to Us (Leiden, 1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Mimesis: Plato's Doctrine of Artistic Imitation and its Meaning to Us (Leiden, 1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Mimesis: Plato's Doctrine of Artistic Imitation and its Meaning to Us (Leiden, 1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Image et apparence dans la théorie platonicienne de la “mimêsis”’, Journal de Psychologie, 2 (1975) 133–60; rpt. as ‘Naissance d'images’, in Religions, Histoires, Raison (Paris, 1979), 105–37.Google Scholar
, ‘Image et apparence dans la théorie platonicienne de la “mimêsis”’, Journal de Psychologie, 2 (1975); rpt. as ‘Naissance d'images’, in Religions, Histoires, Raison (Paris, 1979).Google Scholar
, ‘Image et apparence dans la théorie platonicienne de la “mimêsis”’, Journal de Psychologie, 2 (1975); rpt. as ‘Naissance d'images’, in Religions, Histoires, Raison (Paris, 1979).Google Scholar
, ‘Image et apparence dans la théorie platonicienne de la “mimêsis”’, Journal de Psychologie, 2 (1975); rpt. as ‘Naissance d'images’, in Religions, Histoires, Raison (Paris, 1979).Google Scholar
, ‘Katharsis in der aristotelischen Tragödiendefinition’, Grazer Beiträge, 11 (1984), 67–87.Google Scholar
, The Notes on Philosophy in the Commentary of Servius on the Eclogues, the Georgics, and the Aeneid of Virgil (New York, 1938).Google Scholar
, The Notes on Philosophy in the Commentary of Servius on the Eclogues, the Georgics, and the Aeneid of Virgil (New York, 1938).Google Scholar
, The Varieties of Enchantment: Early Greek Views of the Nature and Function of Poetry (Chapel Hill, 1984).Google Scholar
, The Varieties of Enchantment: Early Greek Views of the Nature and Function of Poetry (Chapel Hill, 1984).Google Scholar
, The Varieties of Enchantment: Early Greek Views of the Nature and Function of Poetry (Chapel Hill, 1984).Google Scholar
, The Varieties of Enchantment: Early Greek Views of the Nature and Function of Poetry (Chapel Hill, 1984).Google Scholar
fragment(s), ed. and tr. , The Remains of Old Latin (see above, Collections), II, pp. 2–43.
fragment(s), ed. and tr. , The Remains of Old Latin (see above, Collections), I (whole vol.).
Lexica: , Lexique de la Rhétorique d'Aristote; Lexique de la Poétique d'Aristote (Paris, 1981; 1985).Google Scholar
, ‘Marked and unmarked: A choice between unequals in semiotic structure’, Semiotica, 38 (1982), 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Marked and unmarked: A choice between unequals in semiotic structure’, Semiotica, 38 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Marked and unmarked: A choice between unequals in semiotic structure’, Semiotica, 38 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Marked and unmarked: A choice between unequals in semiotic structure’, Semiotica, 38 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.), Die Schule des Aristoteles (fragment(s) of the Peripatetic philosophers) (10 vols., Basel, 1944–59).Google Scholar
, ‘The singing of Homer’, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London), 101 (1981), 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, When Words Lose their Meaning: Constitutions and Reconstitutions of Language, Character, and Community (Chicago, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, When Words Lose their Meaning: Constitutions and Reconstitutions of Language, Character, and Community (Chicago, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, When Words Lose their Meaning: Constitutions and Reconstitutions of Language, Character, and Community (Chicago, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, When Words Lose their Meaning: Constitutions and Reconstitutions of Language, Character, and Community (Chicago, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Allegory: The Dynamics of an Ancient and Medieval Technique (Cambridge, Mass., 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Notes sur misthos’, in et al. (eds.), Le monde grecque: Hommage à Claire Préaux (Brussels, 1975), pp. 426–38.Google Scholar
, ‘Notes sur misthos’, in et al. (eds.), Le monde grecque: Hommage à Claire Préaux (Brussels, 1975).Google Scholar
, ‘Notes sur misthos’, in et al. (eds.), Le monde grecque: Hommage à Claire Préaux (Brussels, 1975).Google Scholar
, ‘Notes sur misthos’, in et al. (eds.), Le monde grecque: Hommage à Claire Préaux (Brussels, 1975).Google Scholar
ed., ‘A short organum for the theatre’, esp. sections 28-33, Brecht on Theatre (London, 1964).Google Scholar
, ‘Cicero and the silver age’, in (ed.), Eloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron (Entretiens Hardt, 27) (Geneva, 1982), pp. 237–66.Google Scholar
, ‘Cicero and the silver age’, in (ed.), Eloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron (Entretiens Hardt, 27) (Geneva, 1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Cicero and the silver age’, in (ed.), Eloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron (Entretiens Hardt, 27) (Geneva, 1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Cicero and the silver age’, in (ed.), Eloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron (Entretiens Hardt, 27) (Geneva, 1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Cicero and the silver age’, in (ed.), Eloquence et rhétorique chez Cicéron (Entretiens Hardt, 27) (Geneva, 1982).Google Scholar
, ‘Pindar and the mercenary muse: Isthmian 2.1–13’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 99 (1968), 527–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Pindar and the mercenary muse: Isthmian 2.1–13’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 99 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Pindar and the mercenary muse: Isthmian 2.1–13’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 99 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Pindar and the mercenary muse: Isthmian 2.1–13’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (Currently, Scholars Press, Atlanta, Georgia), 99 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Le développement du style asiatique pendant l'époque hellénistique’, Revue des études grecques (Paris), 88 (1975), 217–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Le développement du style asiatique pendant l'époque hellénistique’, Revue des études grecques (Paris), 88 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Le développement du style asiatique pendant l'époque hellénistique’, Revue des études grecques (Paris), 88 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Le développement du style asiatique pendant l'époque hellénistique’, Revue des études grecques (Paris), 88 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Le développement du style asiatique pendant l'époque hellénistique’, Revue des études grecques (Paris), 88 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Pindar, Aristotle, and Homer: A study in ancient criticism’, in et al. (eds.), Studies in Classical Lyric: A Homage to Elroy Bundy (Classical Antiquity, 2) (Berkeley, 1983), pp. 156–70.Google Scholar
, ‘Pindar, Aristotle, and Homer: A study in ancient criticism’, in et al. (eds.), Studies in Classical Lyric: A Homage to Elroy Bundy (Classical Antiquity, 2) (Berkeley, 1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Pindar, Aristotle, and Homer: A study in ancient criticism’, in et al. (eds.), Studies in Classical Lyric: A Homage to Elroy Bundy (Classical Antiquity, 2) (Berkeley, 1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Pindar, Aristotle, and Homer: A study in ancient criticism’, in et al. (eds.), Studies in Classical Lyric: A Homage to Elroy Bundy (Classical Antiquity, 2) (Berkeley, 1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Enargeia in the ancient criticism of poetry’, Rheinische Museum, 124 (1981), 297–311.Google Scholar
, ‘Re-creating the canon’, see below, bibliography to chapters 5–9.
, ‘Re-creating the canon’, see below, bibliography to chapters 5–9.
, ‘Re-creating the canon’, see below, bibliography to chapters 5–9.
, ‘Re-creating the canon’, see below, bibliography to chapters 5–9.
, ‘Re-creating the canon: Augustan poetry and the Alexandrian poet’, Critical Inquiry, 10 (1983), 83–105.Google Scholar
, ‘Re-creating the canon: Augustan poetry and the Alexandrian poet’, Critical Inquiry, 10 (1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Re-creating the canon: Augustan poetry and the Alexandrian poet’, Critical Inquiry, 10 (1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Re-creating the canon: Augustan poetry and the Alexandrian poet’, Critical Inquiry, 10 (1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Re-creating the canon: Augustan poetry and the Alexandrian poet’, Critical Inquiry, 10 (1983).Google Scholar
, ‘Plutarchos’, Paulys Realencyclopädie der classichen Altertumswissenschaft, 21, 1 (Stuttgart, 1951), coll. 636–962Google Scholar
, ‘Plutarchos’, Paulys Realencyclopädie der classichen Altertumswissenschaft, 21, 1 (Stuttgart, 1951), coll 636–962.Google Scholar