Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:22:19.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - The Sadducees – their history and doctrines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Günter Stemberger
Edited by
William Horbury ,
W. D. Davies  and
John Sturdy
Günter Stemberger
Affiliation:
Institut für Judaistik, Universität Wien
William Horbury
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
W. D. Davies
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

THE SOURCES

Unlike the Pharisees and the Essenes, the Sadducees left no writings. Some scholars have thought to discover a Sadducaean tendency in First Maccabees, but it certainly cannot be considered a Sadducaean book. All the texts on the Sadducees at our disposal were written by their opponents or, at the least, by outsiders. They are necessarily selective and tendentious. Our main witness is Flavius Josephus who, being a scion of a high-ranking priestly family, might be expected to be close to the Sadducees or, at the least, to have inside information about them. He says that in his youth he tested the Sadducaean teaching and way of life, but his writings betray no special knowledge of them. He speaks of the Sadducees almost exclusively in connection with the other groups of the Judaism of his time.

The New Testament provides the earliest references to the Sadducees, in the Gospel of Mark. This gospel frequently names them among the opponents of Jesus, but it does not develop a coherent picture of them. For the New Testament, the Sadducees are entirely secondary to the Pharisees, who are represented as the main group of Judaism and the only important opponents of Jesus.

The Rabbinic sources frequently mention the Sadducees. But these texts have to be used with extreme caution: one has to discard those texts in which the term Sadducees replaces an original mín (which had to be removed because of Church censorship); only a few Tannaitic texts remain, and even they are not fully reliable historically; later texts display no specific knowledge of the historical Sadducees and offer clichés without revealing new information that can be trusted.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Judaism , pp. 428 - 443
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bamberger, B. J. ‘The Sadducees and the Belief in Angels’, Journal of Biblical Literature 82 (1963).Google Scholar
Bammel, E. ‘Kirkisanis Sadduzäer,’ Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 71 (1959); repr. in Judaica, Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 37 (Tübingen 1986).Google Scholar
Bammel, E. ‘Sadduzäer und Sadokiden,’ Ephemerides theologicae lovanienses 55 (1979): repr. in Judaica.Google Scholar
Baumbach, G. ‘Das Sadduzäerverständnis bei Josephus Flavius und im Neuen Testament’, Kairos 13 (1971).Google Scholar
Baumbach, G. ‘Der sadduzäische Konservativismus’ in Maier, J. and Schreiner, J. (eds.) Literatur und Religion des Frühjudentums (Würzburg 1973).Google Scholar
Baumbach, G. ‘The Sadducees in Josephus’ in Feldman, L. H. and Hata, G. (eds.) Josephus, the Bible and History (Detroit 1989).Google Scholar
Baumbach, G.Jesus von Nazareth im Lichte der jüdischen Gruppenbildung. Berlin, Aufsätze und Vorträge zur Theologie und Religionswissenschaft 54 (1971).
Baumgarten, A. I. ‘Rabbinic Literature as a Source for the History of Jewish Sectarianism in the Second Temple Period’, Dead Sea Discoveries 2 (1995).Google Scholar
Baumgarten, J. M. ‘The Pharisaic-Sadducean Controversies about Purity and the Qumran Texts’, Journal of Semitic Studies 31 (1980).Google Scholar
Beckwith, R. T.The Old Testament Canon of the New Testament Church and its Background in Early Judaism (London 1985).
BrewerInstone, D., Techniques and Assumptions in Jewish Exegesis before 70 CE (Texte und Studien zum antiken Judentum 30) (Tübingen 1992).
Daube, D. ‘On Acts 23: Sadducees and Angels’, Journal of Biblical Literature 109 (1990).Google Scholar
Davies, P. R. ‘Sadducees in the Dead Sea Scrolls’ in Sects and Scrolls (SFSHJ 134) (Atlanta 1996).Google Scholar
Derenbourg, J.Essai sur l'istoire et la g.ographie de la PalestineParis 1867
Eisenman, R.Maccabees, Zadokites, Christians and Qumran (Studia postbiblica 34) (Leiden 1983).
Ellis, E. E. ‘Jesus, the Sadducees and Qumran’, New Testament Studies 10 (1963–1964).Google Scholar
Eppstein, V. ‘When and how the Sadducees were excommunicated’, Journal of Biblical Literature 85 (1966).Google Scholar
Geiger, A.Urschrift und Übersetzungen der Bibel (Breslau 1857, edn 2 1928).
Goodman, M. ‘Sadducees and Essenes after 70 CE’ in Porter, S. E., Joyce, P. and Orton, D. E. (eds.) Crossing the Boundaries (Festschrift M. D. Goulder) (Leiden 1994).Google Scholar
Hölscher, G.Der Sadduzäismus. Eine kritische Untersuchung zur späteren jüdischen Religionsgeschichte (Leipzig 1906).
Isser, S. J.The Dositheans. A Samaritan Sect in Late Antiquity, Studies in Judaism in Late Antiquity 17 (Leiden 1976).
Knohl, I. ‘Participation of the People in the Temple Worship: Second Temple Sectarian Conflict and the Biblical Tradition’, Tarbiz 60 (1990–1991) (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Lauterbach, J. Z.Rabbinic Essays (Cincinnati 1951).
Le Moyne, J.Les Sadducéens, Echter Bibel (Paris 1972).
Leszynsky, R.Die Sadduzäer (Berlin 1912).
Lightstone, J. ‘Sadducees versus Pharisees: The Tannaitic Sources’ in Neusner, J. (ed.) Christianity, Judaism, and other Greco-Roman Cults (Fs Morton Smith), 3 Studies in Judaism in Late Antiquity 12 (Leiden 1975).Google Scholar
Main, E. ‘Les Sadducéens et la résurrection des morts: comparaison entre Mc 12, 18–27 et Lc 20, 27–38’, Revue biblique 103 (1996).Google Scholar
Main, E. ‘Les Sadducéens vus par Flavius Josèphe’, Revue biblique 97 (1990).Google Scholar
Meyer, R. ‘Saddoukaios’, Kittel, G. and Friedrich, G. (eds.), Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament (Stuttgart 1933ff) 7 (Stuttgart 1964); Kittel, G. and Friedrich, G. (eds.), Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (Grand Rapids 1964ff); ET of Kittel, G. and Friedrich, G. (eds.), Theologisches Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament (Stuttgart 1933ff) (Grand Rapids, 1971).Google Scholar
Moore, G. F. ‘Fate and Free Will in the Jewish Philosophies according to Josephus’, Harvard Theological Review 22 (1929).Google Scholar
Nemoy, L.Karaite Anthology, Yale Judaica Series 7 (New Haven 1952).
North, R. ‘The Qumran ‘Sadducees”’, Catholic Biblical Quarterly 17 (1955).Google Scholar
Paul, A.Ecrits de Qumran et sectes juives aux premiers siècles de l'Islam. Recherches sur l'origine du Qaraïsme (Paris 1969).
Revel, B.The Karaite Halakah and its Relation to Saddducean, Samaritan and Philonian Halakah (Philadelphia 1913); also in Jewish Quarterly Review NS 2 (1911–1912), Jewish Quarterly Review NS 3 (1912–1913).
Rofé, A. ‘The Beginnings of Sects in Postexilic Judaism’, Cathedra 49 (1988) (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Saldarini, A. J.Pharisees, Scribes and Sadducees in Palestinian Society: A Sociological Approach (Wilmington DE 1988).
Schiffman, L. H. ‘Pharisees and Sadducees in Pesher Nahum’ in Brettler, M. and Fishbane, M. (eds.) Minhah le-Nahum. Biblical and Other Studies Presented to Nahum M. Sarna (JSOT.SS 154) (Sheffield 1993).Google Scholar
Schiffman, L. H.Reclaiming the Dead Sea Scrolls (Philadelphia 1994).
Schubert, K.Die jüdischen Religionsparteien in neutestamentlicher Zeit (Stuttgarter Bibelstudien 43) (Stuttgart 1970).
Schwankl, O.Die Sadduzäerfrage (Mk 12, 18–27 parr.) (Bonner biblische Beiträge 66) (Bonn 1987).
Schwartz, D. R. ‘Law and Truth: On Qumran-Sadducean and Rabbinic Views of Law’ in Dimant, D. and Rappaport, U. (eds.) The Dead Sea Scrolls. Forty Years of Research (STDJ 10) (Leiden 1992).Google Scholar
Simon, M. ‘Les sectes juives d'après les témoignages patristiques’ in Aland, K. and Cross, F. L. (eds.) St Patr 1 (TU 63) (Berlin 1957).Google Scholar
Stemberger, G.Jewish Contemporaries of Jesus. Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes (Minneapolis 1995). (a not very reliable translation of Pharisäer, Sadduzäer, Essener (Stuttgarter Bibelstudien 144) (Stuttgart 1991).
Sussmann, Y. ‘The History of the Halakha and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Preliminary Talmudic Observations on Miqsat Maʾaśe ha-Torah (4QMMT)’ in Qimron, E. and Strugnell, J. (eds.) Qumran Cave 4. V Miqsat Maʾaśe ha-Torah (Benoit, P. et al. (eds.), Discoveries in the Judaean Desert of Jordan 10) (Oxford 1994) (Hebrew version with more extensive footnotes: Tarbiz 59 (1989–1990)).Google Scholar
Tov, E. ‘The Socio-Religious Background of the Paleo-Hebrew Biblical Texts Found at Qumran’ in Schäfer, P. (ed.) Geschichte – Tradition – Reflexion (Festschrift M. Hengel) (Tübingen 1996), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Vermes, G. ‘The Leadership of the Qumran Community: Sons of Zadok – Priests – Congregation’ in Schäfer, P. (ed.) Geschichte – Tradition – Reflexion (Festschrift M. Hengel) (Tübingen 1996), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Viviano, B. and Taylor, J. ‘Sadducees, Angels and Resurrection (Acts 23, 8–9)’, Journal of Biblical Literature 111 (1992).Google Scholar
Wächter, L. ‘Die unterschiedliche Haltung der Pharisäer, Sadduzäer und Essener zur Heimarmene nach dem Bericht des Josephus’, ZRGG 21 (1969).Google Scholar
Wacholder, B. Z.The Dawn of Qumran. The Sectarian Torah and the Teacher of Righteousness (Cincinnati 1983).
Wellhausen, J.Die Pharisäer und die Sadducäer. Eine Untersuchung zur inneren jüdischen Geschichte (Greifswald 1874; repr. Göttingen 1967).
Winter, P. ‘Sadduzäer und Pharisäer’, Kontexte 3 (1966).Google Scholar
Zeitlin, S. ‘Nennt Megillat Taanit antisadduzäische Gedenktage?’, Monatsschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judenthums 81 (1937).Google Scholar
Zeitlin, S. ‘The Sadducees and the Belief in Angels’, Journal of Biblical Literature 83 (1964).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×