Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics
- Cambridge Handbooks In Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Theories and Approaches to Spanish Linguistics
- 1 Generative Linguistics: Syntax
- 2 Optimality Theory and Spanish/Hispanic Linguistics
- 3 Usage-Based Approaches to Spanish Linguistics
- 4 Functional-Typological Approaches to Hispanic Linguistics
- 5 Psycholinguistic Approaches to Hispanic Linguistics
- 6 Corpus Approaches to the Study of Language, Variation, and Change
- Part II The Spanish Sound System
- Part III Spanish Morphosyntax and Meaning
- Part IV Spanish in Social, Geographic, and Historical Contexts
- Part V The Acquisition of Spanish
- Index
- References
6 - Corpus Approaches to the Study of Language, Variation, and Change
from Part I - Theories and Approaches to Spanish Linguistics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 August 2018
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics
- Cambridge Handbooks In Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Theories and Approaches to Spanish Linguistics
- 1 Generative Linguistics: Syntax
- 2 Optimality Theory and Spanish/Hispanic Linguistics
- 3 Usage-Based Approaches to Spanish Linguistics
- 4 Functional-Typological Approaches to Hispanic Linguistics
- 5 Psycholinguistic Approaches to Hispanic Linguistics
- 6 Corpus Approaches to the Study of Language, Variation, and Change
- Part II The Spanish Sound System
- Part III Spanish Morphosyntax and Meaning
- Part IV Spanish in Social, Geographic, and Historical Contexts
- Part V The Acquisition of Spanish
- Index
- References
Summary
The purpose of this chapter is to provide the reader with an introduction to corpus approaches focusing on the research on Spanish variable phenomena. The chapter also offers some introductory information on corpora in Spanish as well as resources and toolkits for searching and statistical analyses. The second part of the chapter illustrates a corpus analysis based on data from Mexico City and Malaga from ‘Project for the sociolinguistic study of the Spanish of Spain and America’. The findings reveal that that the periphrastic future (PF) in the Mexican data set has become much more generalized as the default future expression, while in Malaga, they maintain a more conservative, slower rate of change. The variable rule analysis demonstrates that predictive factors of the use of PF versus morphological future (MF) were region, person, clause type and sentence type. In contrast to traditional analysis, the corpus analysis demonstrates that the distinction between PF and MF is not based on temporal proximity, showing the need to further investigate the linguistic co
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Spanish Linguistics , pp. 121 - 142Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Aaron, J. E. (2006). Variation and Change in Spanish Future Temporal Expression (Doctoral dissertation). University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Aaron, J. E. (2010). Pushing the Envelope: Looking beyond the Variable Context. Language Variation and Change, 22 (1), 1–36.Google Scholar
Alameda, J. R. and Cuetos, F. (1995). Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del español. Oviedo: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar
Anthony, L. (2013). A Critical Look at Software Tools in Corpus Linguistics. Linguistic Research, 30 (2), 141–161.Google Scholar
Arppe, A., Gilquin, G., Glynn, D., Hilpert, M., and Zeschel, A. (2010). Cognitive Corpus Linguistics: Five Points of Debate on Current Theory and Methodology. Corpora, 5 (1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arppe, A. and Järvikivi, J. (2007). Every Method Counts: Combining Corpus-Based and Experimental Evidence in the Study of Synonymy. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 3 (2), 131–59.Google Scholar
Blas Arroyo, J. L. (2008). The Variable Expression of Future Tense in Peninsular Spanish: The Present (and Future) of Inflectional Forms in the Spanish Spoken in a Bilingual Region. Language Variation and Change, 20 (1), 85–126.Google Scholar
Boas, F. (ed.). (2013). Handbook of American Indian Languages. Cambridge University Press. [First published 1911–1922.]Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2003). Cognitive Processes in Grammaticalization. The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, 2, 145–167.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2006). Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. and Eddington, D. (2006). A Usage-Based Approach to Spanish Verbs of “Becoming.” Language, 82 (2), 323–355.Google Scholar
Claes, J. and Ortiz-López, L. A. (2011). Restricciones pragmáticas y sociales en la expresión de futuridad en el español de Puerto Rico. Spanish in Context, 8 (1), 50–72.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2006). A Frequency Dictionary of Spanish: Core Vocabulary for Learners. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2008). New Directions in Spanish and Portuguese Corpus Linguistics. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 1 (1), 149–186.Google Scholar
Díaz-Campos, Manuel. (2004). Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Variables in Spanish: Do Children Acquire Individual Lexical Forms or Variable Rules? In Face, Timothy (ed.), Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 221–236.Google Scholar
Díaz-Campos, Manuel. (2011). Introduction. In Díaz-Campos, Manuel (ed.), The Handbook of Hispanic Sociolinguistics. Chichester: John Wiley, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Díaz-Campos, M. and Geeslin, K. L. (2011). Copula Use in the Spanish of Venezuela: Is the Pattern Indicative of Stable Variation or an Ongoing Change? Spanish in Context, 8 (1), 73–94.Google Scholar
Giraldo, J. J. M. (1962). Sobre la categoría de futuro en el español de Colombia. Thesaurus, 1 (3), 527–555.Google Scholar
Harris, A. C. and Campbell, L. (1995). Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. and Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Julliand, A. J. and Chang-Rodríguez, E. (1964). The Spanish Frequency Word Book. New York: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kanwit, M. (2017). What We Gain by Combining Variationist and Concept-Oriented Approaches: The Case of Acquiring Spanish Future-Time Expression. Language Learning. doi: 10.1111/lang.12234Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A. (2015). Corpus Linguistics in Trademark Cases. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America, 36 (1), 100–114.Google Scholar
Lastra, Y. and Butragueño, P. (2010). Futuro perifrástico y futuro morfológico en el Corpus Sociolingüístico de la Ciudad de México. Oralia, 13, 145–171.Google Scholar
Lope Blanch, J. M. (1986). El estudio del español hablado culto: historia de un proyecto. Mexico City: UNAM, Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas, Centro de Lingüística Hispánica.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, A. and Liu, B. (2012). Aspect Extraction through Semi-Supervised Modeling. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers, Vol. 1, pp. 339–348. Available from https://aclweb.org/anthology/P/P12/P12-1.pdf (last access October 24, 2017).Google Scholar
Orozco, R. (2005). Distribution of Future Time Forms in Northern Colombian Spanish. In Eddington, D. (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 56–65.Google Scholar
PRESEEA (2014– ). Corpus del proyecto para el estudio sociolingüístico del español de España y de América. Universidad de Alcalá. preseea.linguas.netGoogle Scholar
Samper Padilla, J. A., Hernández Cabrera, C. E., and Troya Déniz, M. (1998). Macrocorpus de la norma lingüística culta de las principales ciudades de España y América. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria: Universidad de Las Palmas y ALFAL [CD-ROM].Google Scholar
Sanz, I. (2009). The Diachrony of New Mexican Spanish, 1683–1926: Philology, Corpus Linguistics and Dialect Change (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward (1916). Time Perspective in Aboriginal American Culture, A Study in Method. Ottawa: Government Printing Bureau.Google Scholar
Sedano, M. (1994). El futuro morfológico y la expresión ir a + infinitivo en el español hablado de Venezuela. Verba, 21, 225–240.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. and Terrell, T. (1989). Notas sobre la expresión de futuridad en el español del Caribe. Hispanic Linguistics, 2, 191–208.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. (2011). Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tarallo, F. (1989). Inside and Outside Relative Clauses. In Fasold, R. and Schiffrin, D. (eds.), Language Change and Variation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 255–274.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1988). Pragmatic Strengthening and Grammaticalization. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 406–416.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. and Dasher, R. B. (2002). Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zahler, S. and Daidone, D. (2014). A Variationist Account of Trill /r/ Usage in the Spanish of Málaga. Indiana University Linguistics Club Working Papers, 14 (2), 17–42.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by