Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:50:02.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Pounding on Parsons: How Criticism Undermined the Reputation of Sociology’s Incurable Theorist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

Peter Kivisto
Affiliation:
Augustana College, Illinois
Get access

Summary

This chapter offers a critique of those critics who leveled broadsides against Parsonian theory as text – intended to assess the analytical and semantic consistency of his writings as well as the style of their presentation – but also against Parsons as a person – his character and reputation. The goal is to dispel the negative mythology that has enveloped Parsonianism during the past few academic generations.

A. Javier Treviño is Professor of Sociology at Wheaton College, Massachusetts. He is the author of several books and editor of The Anthem Companion to Talcott Parsons, Talcott Parsons on Law and the Legal System, and Talcott Parsons Today: His Theory and Legacy in Contemporary Sociology.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abend, Gabriel. 2008. “The Meaning of ‘Theory.’” Sociological Theory 26(2): 173199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berghahn, Klaus L. 2003. “Criticism.” In Kors, Alan Charles (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment, vol. 1, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bershady, Harold J. 2014. When Marx Mattered: An Intellectual Odyssey. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Best, Shaun. 2015. Talcott Parsons: Despair and Modernity. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Breggin, Peter R. 1956. “The Empire Builder.” Harvard Crimson, May 16.Google Scholar
Caygill, Howard. 1995. A Kant Dictionary. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chira, Susan D. 1978. “Professor Discuss Marxism During Sociology Conference.” Harvard Crimson, April 10.Google Scholar
Chriss, James J. 1999. Alvin W. Gouldner: Sociologist and Outlaw Marxist. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jere. 1975. “Comment: Moral Freedom through Understanding in Durkheim.” American Sociological Review 40(1): 104106.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jere, Hazelrigg, Lawrence E., and Pope, Whitney. 1975a. “De-Parsonizing Weber: A Critique of Parsons’s Interpretation of Weber’s Sociology.” American Sociological Review 40(2): 229241.Google Scholar
1975b. “Reply to Parsons.” American Sociological Review 40(5): 670–674.Google Scholar
Coser, Lewis A. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1958. “Out of Utopia: Toward a Reorientation of Sociological Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology 64(2): 115–127.Google Scholar
Fox, Renée C., Lidz, Victor M., and Bershady, Harold J. (eds.). 2005. After Parsons: A Theory of Social Action for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. 1957. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Uta. 1996. “Scholarship, Not Scandal.” Sociological Forum 11(4): 623630.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Uta.2002. Talcott Parsons: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Uta.2011. The Social Thought of Talcott Parsons: Methodology and American Ethos. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Gerth, Hans, and Mills, C. Wright. 1953. Character and Social Structure: The Psychology of Social Institutions. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1965. Enter Plato: Classical Greece and the Origins of Social Theory. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1981. “Talcott Parsons: Problems of Theory Construction.” Sociological Inquiry 51(3–4): 173196.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Peter (ed.). 1992. Talcott Parsons: Critical Assessments, vol 1. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher (ed.). 2010. Essays on Honour of Talcott Parsons. Cheshire, UK: Midrash.Google Scholar
Holton, Robert J., and Turner, Bryan S.. 1986. Talcott Parsons on Economy and Society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Homans, George C. 1964a. “Contemporary Theory in Sociology.” In Robert, E. L. Faris (ed.), Handbook of Modern Sociology (pp. 951–977). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
1964b. “Bringing Men Back In.” American Sociological Review 29(5): 809818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1967. The Nature of Social Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Irving Louis. 1983. C. Wright Mills: An American Utopian. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, Michael. 1992. A Hegel Dictionary. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jedlowski, Paolo. 2005. “Becoming a Sociologist in Italy.” In Sica, Alan and Turner, Stephen P. (eds.), The Disobedient Generation: Social Theorists in the Sixties (pp. 141–154). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Keen, Mike Forrest. 1999. Stalking the Sociological Imagination: J. Edgar Hoover’s Surveillance of American Sociology. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, Keith. 2009. Postmodern Cowboy: C. Wright Mills and a New 21st Century. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Lockwood, David. 1956. “Some Remarks on ‘The Social System’.” The British Journal of Sociology 7(2): 134146.Google Scholar
Lottman, Michael S. 1961. “19 Harvard Professors Sign Anti-HUAC Paper.” Harvard Crimson, March 20. Accessed November 26, 2016. www.thecrimson.com/article/1961/3/20/19-harvard-professors-sign-anti-huac-paper/Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1982. The Differentiation of Society. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Markovsky, Barry. 2008. “Graduate Training in Sociological Theory and Theory Construction.” Sociological Perspectives 51(2): 423445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1976. Sociological Ambivalence and Other Essays. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K., and Newcomb, Theodore. 1948. “Discussion.American Sociological Review 13(2): 164168.Google Scholar
Miller, James. 1987. Democracy Is in the Streets: From Port Huron to the Siege of Chicago. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright, 1940. “Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive.” American Sociological Review 5(6): 904913.Google Scholar
1948. The New Men of Power: America’s Labor Leaders. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
1951. White Collar: The American Middle Classes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1956. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1958. “The Man in the Middle.” Industrial Design 5: 7075.Google Scholar
1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Kathryn, with Pamela, Mills (eds.). 2000. C. Wright Mills: Letters and Autobiographical Writings. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Jens Kaalhauge. 1991. “The Political Orientation of Talcott Parsons: The Second World War and Its Aftermath.” In Roland, Robertson and Bryan, S. Turner (eds.), Talcott Parsons: Theorist of Modernity (pp. 217–233). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Outhwaite, William. 2005. “From Switzerland to Sussex.” In Sica, Alan and Turner, Stephen P. (eds.), The Disobedient Generation: Social Theorists in the Sixties (pp. 205–220). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Owens, Robert. 2010. “Producing Parsons’s Reputation: Early Critiques of Talcott Parsons’s Social Theory and the Making of a Caricature.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 46(2): 165188.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1937. The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
1945. “The Present Position and Prospects of Systematic Theory in Sociology.” In Gurvitch, Georges and Moore, Wilbert E. (eds.), Twentieth Century Sociology (pp. 42–69). New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
1948. “The Position of Sociological Theory.” American Sociological Review 13(2): 156171.Google Scholar
1950. “The Prospects of Sociological Theory.” American Sociological Review 15(1): 316.Google Scholar
1951. The Social System. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
1954. Essays in Sociological Theory. Revised edition. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
1955. “‘McCarthyism’ and American Social Tension: A Sociologist’s View.” Yale Review 44: 226245.Google Scholar
1957. “The Distribution of Power in American Society.” World Politics 10(1): 123143.Google Scholar
1964. “Levels of Organization and the Mediation of Social Interaction.” Sociological Inquiry 34(2): 207220.Google Scholar
1965. “Full Citizenship for the Negro American? A Sociological Problem.” Daedalus 94(4): 10091054.Google Scholar
1970. “Some Problems of General Theory in Sociology.” In McKinney, John C. and Tiryakian, Edward A. (eds.), Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments (pp. 27–68). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
2006a. American Society: A Theory of the Societal Community. Edited by Sciortino, Giuseppe. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
2006b. Action Theory: Methodological Studies. Edited by Victor, Lidz and Helmut, Staubman. Vienna: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
2010. Actor, Situation, and Normative Pattern: An Essay in the Theory of Social Action. Edited by Victor, Lidz and Helmut, Staubman. Vienna: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, and Shils, Edward A. (eds.). 1951. Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, and Platt, Gerald M.. 1973. The American University. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, and Smelser, Neil J.. 1956. Economy and Society: A Study in the Integration of Economic and Social Theory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, and White, Winston. 2016. Values of American Society. Edited by Victor, Lidz and Helmut, Staubman. Vienna: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, and White, Winston. In press. Subsystems of American Society. Edited by Victor, Lidz and Helmut, Staubman. Vienna: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jesse R. 1980. “Talcott Parsons: The Sociologist as the Last Puritan.” American Sociologist 15(2): 62.Google Scholar
Pope, Whitney. 1973. “Classic on Classic: Parsons’s Interpretation of Durkheim.” American Sociological Review 38(4): 399415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1975. “Parsons on Durkheim, Revisited.” American Sociological Review 40(1): 111114.Google Scholar
Pope, Whitney, Cohen, Jere, and Hazelrigg, Lawrence E.. 1975. “On the Divergence of Weber and Durkheim: A Critique of Parsons’s Convergence Thesis.” American Sociological Review 40(4): 417427.Google Scholar
Pope, Whitney, Cohen, Jere, and Hazelrigg, Lawrence E.. 1977. “Reply to Parsons.” American Sociological Review 42(5): 809811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Roland, and Turner, Bryan S. (eds.). 1991. Talcott Parsons: Theorist of Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Savage, Stephen P. 1981. The Theories of Talcott Parsons: The Social Relations of Action. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Scott, A. O. 2016. Better Living through Criticism: How to Think About Art, Pleasure, Beauty, and Truth. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Segre, Sandro. 2012. Talcott Parsons: An Introduction. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Sica, Alan and Turner, Stephen (eds.). 2005. The Disobedient Generation: Social Theorists in the Sixties. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward A. 1960. “Imaginary Sociology.” Encounter 21: 7780.Google Scholar
Smith, Dennis. 2001. Norbert Elias and Modern Social Theory. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Rodney. 1997. “Bringing Theory Back In.” In Young, Lawrence A. (ed.), Rational Choice Theory and Religion: Summary and Assessment (pp. 3–23). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Swados, Harvey. 1963. “C. Wright Mills: A Personal Memoir.” Dissent 10(1): 3542.Google Scholar
Treviño, A. Javier (ed.). 2001. Talcott Parsons Today: His Theory and Legacy in Contemporary Sociology. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
2008. Talcott Parsons on Law and the Legal System. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2012. The Social Thought of C. Wright Mills. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
2016. The Anthem Companion to Talcott Parsons. London: Anthem.Google Scholar
Turner, Bryan S. 1986. “Parsons and His Critics: On the Ubiquity of Functionalism.” In Holton, Robert J. and Turner, Bryan S. (eds.), Talcott Parsons on Economy and Society (pp. 179–205). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1991a. “Neofunctionalism and the ‘New Theoretical Movement’: The Post-Parsonian Rapprochement between Germany and America.” In Robertson, Roland and Turner, Bryan S. (eds.), Talcott Parsons: Theorist of Modernity (pp. 234–251). London: Sage.Google Scholar
1991b. “Preface to the New Edition.” In Parsons, Talcott, The Social System (pp. xiii–xxx). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen P. 2005. “High on Insubordination.” In Sica, Alan and Turner, Stephen P. (eds.), The Disobedient Generation: Social Theorists in the Sixties (pp. 285–308). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wiener, Jon. 1989. “Talcott Parsons’s Role: Bringing Nazi Sympathizers to the US.” The Nation, March 6, pp. 306309.Google Scholar
Wellek, René. 1963. Concepts of Criticism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Jr., Robin. 1980. “Talcott Parsons: The Stereotypes and the Realities.” American Sociologist 15(2): 6466.Google Scholar
Wrong, Dennis H. 1961. “The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modern Sociology.” American Sociological Review 26(2): 183193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. “Truth, Misinterpretation, or Left-Wing McCarthyism?Sociological Forum 11(4): 613621.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×