Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T03:42:03.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part Five - Semantics and Pragmatics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2022

Edited by
Adam Ledgeway  and
Martin Maiden
Adam Ledgeway
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Martin Maiden
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics , pp. 671 - 814
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Blank, A. and Koch, P., eds. (2003). Kognitive romanische Onomasiologie und Semasiologie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. and Traugott, E. (2005). Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchi, E. and Dworkin, S.N. (2019). ‘Etymology in Romance’. In Loporcaro, M. and Gardani, F. (eds), The Oxford Encyclopedia of Romance Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.441Google Scholar
Cornillie, B. and Izquierdo Alegría, D. (eds) (2017). Gramática, semántica y pragmática de la evidencialidad. Pamplona: EUNSA.Google Scholar
Cruschina, S. and Remberger, E.-M., (eds) (2017). The Rise and Development of Evidential and Epistemic Markers. Special Issue of Journal of Historical Linguistics 7.Google Scholar
Friedman, V. (2018). ‘Where do evidentials come from?’ In Aikhenvald, A. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125–54.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, C. and Molinelli, P. (eds) (2014). Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loureda, O. and Pons Bordería, S. (eds) (forthcoming). Discourse-Pragmatic Change in Romance. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Norde, M. (2009). Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolova, N. (2015). Cognitive Linguistics and Lexical Change. Motion Verbs from Latin to Romance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. and Dasher, R. (2002). Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Willis, D. (2017). ‘Degrammaticalization’. In Ledgeway, A. and Roberts, I. (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 28–48.Google Scholar

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Bertinetto, P. M. and Squartini, M. (2016). ‘Tense and aspect’. In Ledgeway, A. and Maiden, M. (eds), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 939–53.Google Scholar
Carlier, A. and Lamiroy, B. (2018). ‘The emergence of the grammatical paradigm of nominal determiners in French and in Romance: comparative and diachronic perspectives’. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 63: 141–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, S. (2011). Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gianollo, C. (2018). Indefinites between Latin and Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labelle, M. and Espinal, M. T. (2014). ‘Diachronic changes in negative expressions: the case of French’, Lingua 145: 194–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, A., (2020). ‘Rethinking microvariation in Romance demonstrative systems’. In Bárány, A., Biberauer, T., Douglas, J., and Vikner, S. (eds), Syntactic Architecture and Its Consequences. II. Between Syntax and Morphology. Open Generative Syntax Series. Berlin: Language Science Press, 451–90.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, A., Schifano, N., and Silvestri, G. (2019a). ‘Differential object marking and the properties of D in the dialects of the extreme south of Italy’, Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1): 511–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R. and Savoia, L. (2011). Grammatical Categories. Variation in Romance Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins, A. M. (2000). ‘Polarity items in Romance: underspecification and lexical change’. In Pintzuk, S., Tsoulas, G., and Warner, A. (eds), Diachronic Syntax. Models and Mechanisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 191–219.Google Scholar
Poletto, C. (2016). ‘Negation’. In Ledgeway, A. and Maiden, M. (eds), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 833–46.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. and König, E. (1991). ‘The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited’. In Traugott, E. and Heine, B. (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, I: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Beyssade, C. and Marandin, J.-M. (2006b). ‘The speech act assignment problem revisited: disentangling speaker’s commitment from speaker’s call on addressee’. In Bonami, O. and Cabredo-Hofherr, P. (eds), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6. Paris: CSSP, 37–68.Google Scholar
Coniglio, M. and Zegrean, I. (2012). ‘Splitting up force’. In Haegeman, L., Aelbrecht, L., and Nye, R. (eds), Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 190–229.Google Scholar
Corr, A. (2017). Ibero-Romance and the Syntax of the Utterance. Doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Giorgi, A. (2010). About the Speaker: Towards a Syntax of Indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giurgea, I. and Remberger, E.M. (2016). ‘Illocutionary force’. In Ledgeway, A. and Maiden, M. (eds), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 863–78.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. and Hill, V. (2013). ‘The syntactization of discourse’. In Folli, R., Sevdali, C., and Truswell, R. (eds), Syntax and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 370–90.Google Scholar
Martins, A. M. (2014). ‘How much syntax is there in metalinguistic negation?’, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32(2): 635–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moro, A. (2003). ‘Notes on vocative case: a case study in clause structure’. In Quer, J., Schroten, Scorretti, M., Sleeman, P., and Verheugd, E. (eds), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 247–61.Google Scholar
Munaro, N. (2010). ‘Towards a hierarchy of clause types’. In Benincà, P. and Munaro, N. (eds), Mapping the Left Periphery. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125–62.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1997). ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’. In Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadock, J. and Zwicky, A. (1985). ‘Speech act distinctions in syntax’. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 155–96.Google Scholar
Speas, P. and Tenny, C. (2003). ‘Configurational properties of point of view roles’. In Di Sciullo, A. M. (ed.), Asymmetry in Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 315–45.Google Scholar

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Adams, J. (2013). Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1960). ‘The pronouns of power and solidarity’. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 253–76.Google Scholar
Dakubu, E.K. (2012). ‘The Portuguese language on the Gold Coast, 1471–1897’, Ghana Journal of Linguistics 1: 15–33.Google Scholar
Ferrari, L. (2015). ‘Spanish varieties of Latin America 1: South America’. In Jungbluth, K. and Da Milano, F. (eds), Manual of Deixis in Romance Languages. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 258–78.Google Scholar
Helmbrecht, J. (2013). ‘Politeness distinctions in pronouns’. In Dryer, M. S. and Haspelmath, M. (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/45.Google Scholar
Jungbluth, K. (2015). ‘Creoles’. In Jungbluth, K. and Da Milano, F. (eds), Manual of Deixis in Romance Languages. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 332–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungbluth, K. and Da Milano, F. (eds) (2015). Manual of Deixis in Romance Languages. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungbluth, K. and Vallentin, R. (2015). ‘Brazilian Portuguese’. In Jungbluth, K. and Da Milano, F. (eds), Manual of Deixis in Romance Languages. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 315–31.Google Scholar
Kluge, B. (2016). ‘Forms of address and community identity’. In Moyna, M. and Rivera-Mills, S. (eds), Forms of Address in the Spanish of the Americas. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 325–33.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, A. (2015). ‘Varieties in Italy’. In Jungbluth, K. and Da Milano, F. (eds), Manual of Deixis in Romance Languages. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 75–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopes, C. R. S. and Couto, L.R. (eds) (2011). As formas de tratamento em português e em espanhol: variação, mudança e funções conversacionais. Niterói: Editora da UFF.Google Scholar
Siewierska, A. (2013). ‘Gender distinctions in independent personal pronouns’. In Dryer, M. S. and Haspelmath, M. (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/44.Google Scholar
Stavinschi, A. (2015). ‘Romanian’. In Jungbluth, K. and Da Milano, F. (eds), Manual of Deixis in Romance Languages. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 17–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selected References

Below you can find selected references for this chapter. The full references can be found online at the following page: www.cambridge.org/Romancelinguistics

Belletti, A. (2004). ‘Aspects of the low IP area’. In Rizzi, L. (ed.), The Structure of IP and CP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, II. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 16–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benincà, P. (2001). ‘The position of topic and focus in the left periphery’. In Cinque, G. and Salvi, G. (eds), Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, S. (2012). Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, S. (2016). ‘Information and discourse structure’. In Ledgeway, A. and Maiden, M. (eds), The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 596–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, S., and Remberger, E.-M. (2017). ‘Focus fronting.’ In Dufter, G. and Stark, E. (eds), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter, 502–35.Google Scholar
Giurgea, I. (2016). ‘On the interpretation of focus fronting in Romanian’, Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 37–61.Google Scholar
Giurgea, I. (2017). ‘Preverbal subjects and topic marking in Romanian’, Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 62: 279–322.Google Scholar
Leonetti, M. (2017). ‘Basic constituent orders’. In Dufter, A. and Stark, E. (eds), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 887–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remberger, E.-M. (2010). ‘Left peripheral interactions in Sardinian’, Lingua 120: 555–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remberger, E.-M. (2014). ‘A comparative look on focus fronting in Romance’. In Dufter, A. and Toledo y Huerta, À. O. (eds), Left Sentence Peripheries of Spanish. Diachronic, Variationist and Comparative Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 383–418.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1997). ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’. In Haegeman, L. (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281–337.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Semantics and Pragmatics
  • Edited by Adam Ledgeway, University of Cambridge, Martin Maiden, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics
  • Online publication: 23 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580410.026
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Semantics and Pragmatics
  • Edited by Adam Ledgeway, University of Cambridge, Martin Maiden, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics
  • Online publication: 23 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580410.026
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Semantics and Pragmatics
  • Edited by Adam Ledgeway, University of Cambridge, Martin Maiden, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Romance Linguistics
  • Online publication: 23 June 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580410.026
Available formats
×