Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:30:54.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part Five - Grammatical Sketches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2023

Edited by
Delia Bentley ,
Ricardo Mairal Usón ,
Wataru Nakamura  and
Robert D. Van Valin, Jr
Delia Bentley
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Ricardo Mairal Usón
Affiliation:
Universidad National de Educación a Distancia, Madrid
Wataru Nakamura
Affiliation:
Tohoku University, Japan
Robert D. Van Valin, Jr
Affiliation:
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Role and Reference Grammar , pp. 821 - 982
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Aissen, Judith. 1997. On the syntax of obviation. Language 73(4): 705–750.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1946. Algonquian. In Osgood, C. and Hoijer, H. (eds.), Linguistic structures of Native America (Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 6), 85–129. New York: Viking Fund.Google Scholar
Corral Esteban, Avelino. 2014. An analysis of transitivity in Cheyenne. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 61(4): 379–422.Google Scholar
Corral Esteban, Avelino. 2017. Multi-verb constructions in Cheyenne. In Nolan, B. and Diedrichsen, E. (eds.), Argument Realization in Complex Predicates and Complex Events: Verb-Verb Constructions at the Syntax–Semantics Interface (Studies in Language Comparison Series), 305–346. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1986. Primary object, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 62: 808–845.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1992. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Louise, Leman, Wayne, Pine Sr, Leroy. and Sanchez, Marie. 2006. Cheyenne Dictionary. Lame Deer, MT: Chief Dull Knife College.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1996. Voice in Algonquian verbs: A suggestion. In Nichols, John D. and Ogg, Arden C. (eds.), nikotwāsik iskwāhtēm, pāskihtēpayih! Studies in Honour of Hans Christoph Wolfart. Winnipeg: Algonquian and Iroquoian Linguistics: 257–261.Google Scholar
Leman, Elena. 1999. Word Order of Major Constituents in Cheyenne Narratives. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Leman, Wayne. 1980a. Cheyenne Texts: An Introduction to Cheyenne Literature (Occasional Publications in Anthropology, Linguistics Series No. 6). Greeley, CO: Museum of Anthropology, University of Northern Colorado.Google Scholar
Leman, Wayne. 1980b. A Reference Grammar of the Cheyenne Language, Vols. 1 and 2 (Occasional Publications in Anthropology, Linguistics Series No. 5). Greeley, CO: Museum of Anthropology, University of Northern Colorado.Google Scholar
Leman, Wayne. 1987. Náévâhóó’ôhtséme / We are going back home: Cheyenne History and Stories Told by James Shoulderblade and Others. Memoir 4. Winnipeg: Algonquian and Iroquoian Linguistics.Google Scholar
Meeussen, Achilles E. 1962. The independent order in Cheyenne. Orbis 11: 260–288.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1987. Is basic word order universal? In Tomlin, Russell S. (ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, 281–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Petter, Rodolphe. 1952. Cheyenne Grammar. Newton, KS: Mennonite Publication Office.Google Scholar
Russell, Dale W. 1987. Cheyenne Verb Agreement in GPSG. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Shimojo, Mitsuaki. 2009. Focus structure and beyond: Discourse-pragmatics in Role and Reference Grammar. In Guerrero, Lilián, Cerda, Sergio Ibáñez and Belloro, Valeria A. (eds.), Studies in Role and Reference Grammar, 111–141. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Shimojo, Mitsuaki. 2010. The left periphery and focus structure in Japanese. In Wataru Nakamura (ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Role and Reference Grammar (RRG 2009), 315–335.Google Scholar
Shimojo, Mitsuaki. 2011. The left periphery and focus structure in Japanese. In Nakamura, W. (ed.), New Perspectives in Role and Reference Grammar, 266–293. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna (ed.). 1997. Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2005. Exploring the Syntax–Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. (ed.). 2008. Investigations of the Syntax–Semantics–Pragmatics Interface. (Studies in Language Companion Series 105). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. and LaPolla, Randy J.. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolvengrey, Arok. 2011. Semantic and Pragmatic Functions in Plains Cree Syntax. MA thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

References

Bresnan, Joan and Moshi, Lioba. 1990. Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 147–185.Google Scholar
Broadwell, George Aaron. 2006. A Choctaw Reference Grammar. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55: 59–138.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro and Byarushengo, Ernest. 1977. On the notion of ‘direct object’. In Byarushengo, Ernest, Duranti, Alessandro and Hyman, Larry (eds.), Haya Grammatical Structure, 54–71. Los Angeles: Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Foley, William. 1986. The Papuan Languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William. 1991. The Yimas Language of New Guinea. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William. 2005. Linguistic prehistory in the Sepik Ramu basin. In Pawley, Andrew, Attenborough, Robert, Golson, Jack and Hide, Robin (eds.), Papuan Pasts: Cultural, Linguistic and Biological Histories of Papuan-Speaking Peoples (Pacific Linguistics 572), 109–144. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Foley, William. 2017a. The languages of the Sepik-Ramu basin and environs. In Palmer, Bill (ed.), The Languages and Linguistics of the New Guinea Area: A Comprehensive Guide, 177–412. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Foley, William. 2017b. Yimas: The profile of a polysynthetic language of New Guinea. In Evans, Nicholas, Fortescue, Michael and Mithun, Marianne (eds.), Handbook of Polysynthesis, 808–829. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William and Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1976. The adjoined relative clause in Australia. In Dixon, Robert (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, 76–105. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1983. Warlbiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 5–47.Google Scholar
Martin, Jack B. 2011. A Grammar of Creek (Muskogee). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela. 1984. The syntactic status of object possessor raising in Western Muskogean. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 10: 634–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela and Gordon, Lynn. 1982. Syntactic relations in Western Muskogean: A typological perspective. Language 58: 81–115.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew. 1993. A language which defies description by ordinary means. In Foley, William (ed.), The Role of Theory in Language Description, 87–130. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2005. Exploring the Syntax–Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2013. Head-marking languages and linguistic theory. In Bickel, Balthasar, Grenoble, Lenore, Peterson, David and Timberlake, Alan (eds.), Language Typology and Historical Contingency, 91–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. and LaPolla, Randy. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Ameka, Felix K. 1995. The linguistic construction of space in Ewe. Cognitive Linguistics 6: 139–181.Google Scholar
Casti, Francesco. 2012. Testing the Interclausal Relations Hierarchy: Aspectual and Modal Periphrases in Modern Sardinian. PhD dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Caudal, Patrick and Nicolas, David. 2005. Types of degrees and types of event structures. In Maienborn, Claudia and Wöllstein, Angelika (eds.), Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications, 277–300. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Defina, Rebecca. 2009. Aspect and Modality in Avatime. MA thesis, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Defina, Rebecca. 2016a. Events in Languages and Thought: The Case of Serial Verb Constructions in Avatime. PhD dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Defina, Rebecca. 2016b. Serial verb constructions and their subtypes in Avatime. Studies in Language 40(3): 648–680.Google Scholar
Defina, Rebecca. 2018. Tense, aspect and mood in Avatime. Afrika und Übersee 92: 65–97.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2012. Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(10): 654–672.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. and Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1980. The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements, Studies in Language 4(3): 333–377.Google Scholar
Kockelman, Paul. 2003. The Interclausal Relations Hierarchy in Q’ecqchi’ Maya. International Journal of American Linguistics 69: 25–48.Google Scholar
van Putten, Saskia. 2014a. Information Structure in Avatime. PhD dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
van Putten, Saskia. 2014b. Left-dislocation and subordination in Avatime (Kwa). In van Gijn, Rik, Hammond, Jeremy, Matić, Dejan, van Putten, Saskia and Galucio, Ana Vilacy (eds.), Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences, 71–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
van Putten, Saskia. 2016. Discourse functions of focus marking in Avatime. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 37(1): 91–130.Google Scholar
Schuh, Russell G. 1995. Avatime noun classes and concord. Studies in African Linguistics 24(2): 123–149.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Dixon, R. M. W., ed., Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Van, Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1985. Case marking and the structure of the Lakhota clause. In Johanna Nichols and Anthony C. Woodbury (eds.), Grammar Inside and Outside the Clause, 363–413. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantic Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. and LaPolla, Randy J.. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Welmers, William E. 1973. African Language Structures. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

References

Andersen, T. David and Roberts, John R.. 1991. An exception to the hodiernal: non-hodiernal distinction. Studies in Language 15(2): 295–299.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Some general properties of reference-tracking systems. In Arnold, Doug, Atkinson, Martin, Durand, Jacques, Grover, Claire and Sadler, Louisa (eds.), Essays on Grammatical Theory and Universal Grammar, 37–51. Cheltenham: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 1993. A Study of Japanese Clause Linkage: The Connective te in Japanese. Stanford, CAS: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Imai, Shingo. 1998. Logical Structures and Case Marking in Japanese. Unpublished MA project, University at Buffalo (SUNY).Google Scholar
Kroeger, Paul R. 2004. Analyzing Syntax. A Lexical-Functional Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Latrouite, Anja and Van Valin, R. D. Jr. 2014. Event existentials in Tagalog: A Role and Reference Grammar account. In Arka, I. Wayan and Mas Indrawati, N. L. K (eds.), Argument Realisations and Related Constructions in Austronesian Languages: Papers from 12-ICAL, Vol. 2, 161–174. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, Simons, Gary F. and Fennig, Charles D. (eds.). 2014. Amele. In Ethnologue: Languages of the World (17th ed.). Dallas, TX: SIL International. www.ethnologue.com/language/aey.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1987. Amele. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1988a. Amele switch-reference and the Theory of Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 19(1): 45–63.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1988b. Switch-reference in Papuan languages: A syntactic or extrasyntactic device? Australian Journal of Linguistics 8: 75–118.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1990. Modality in Amele and other Papuan languages. Journal of Linguistics 26: 363–401.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1991a. Reduplication in Amele. In T. Dutton (ed.) Papers in Papuan Linguistics, No. 1, 115–146. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1991b. A study of the dialects of Amele. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 22(1–2): 67–126.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1991c. Orthography reform in Amele: Part One. Notes on Literacy 17(4): 1–20.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1992. Orthography reform in Amele: Part Two. Notes on Literacy 18( 1): 1–32.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1994. The category ‘irrealis’ in Papuan medial verbs. Notes on Linguistics 67: 5–39.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1996. A Government and Binding analysis of the verb in Amele. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 27(1): 1–66.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1997a. Switch-reference in Papua New Guinea: A preliminary survey. In A. Pawley (ed.), Papers in Papuan Linguistics, No. 3, 101–241. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1997b. The syntax of discourse structure. Notes on Translation 11(2): 15–34.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1997c. GIVE in Amele. In Newman, John (ed.), The Linguistics of Giving, 1–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. www.sil.org/resources/archives/22980.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 2001. Impersonal constructions in Amele. In Aikenvald, Alexandra Y., Dixon, R. M. W. and Onishi, Masayuki (eds.), Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects (Typological Studies in Language 46), 201–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 2012. Serial verbs in English: An RRG analysis of catenative verb constructions. Functions of Language 19(2): 201–234.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 2015a. Distributives in Amele. A Role and Reference Grammar analysis. SIL Electronic Workpapers 2015–001. www.sil.org/resources/publications/entry/60478.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 2015b. Inalienable possession in Amele: A Role and Reference Grammar account. SIL Electronic Workpapers 2015–002. www.sil.org/resources/publications/entry/60480.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 2017. The typology of switch-reference. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Handbook of Linguistics Typology, 538–573. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley. 1993. Switch-Reference and Discourse Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2007. Lexical typologies. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 66–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toratani, Kiyoko. 2002. The Morphosyntax and the Logical Structures of Compound Verbs in Japanese. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University at Buffalo (SUNY).Google Scholar
Z’graggen, John A. 1975. The Languages of the Madang District, Papua New Guinea (Pacific Linguistics B-41). Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar

References

Blust, Robert. 1999. Subgrouping, circularity and extinction: Some issues in Austronesian comparative linguistics. In Zeitoun, Elizabeth and Jen-kuei Li, Pau (eds.), Selected Papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 31–94. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Bril, Isabelle. 2016. Information structure in Northern Amis: A morphosyntactic analysis. Oceanic Linguistics 55(2): 449–479.Google Scholar
Chen, Teresa. 1987. Verbal Constructions and Verbal Classification in Nataoran-Amis (Pacific Linguistics C-85). Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Guerrero Valenzuela, Lilián and Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2004. Yaqui and the analysis of primary object languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 70: 290–319.Google Scholar
Huang, Lillian. 2000. Verb classification in Mayrinax Atayal. Oceanic Linguistics 39(2): 364–390.Google Scholar
Jolly, Julia. 1993. Preposition assignment in English. In Van Valin (ed.), 275–310.Google Scholar
Liu, Dorinda Tsai-hsiu. 1999. Cleft Constructions in Amis. MA thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei.Google Scholar
Liu, Emma En-hsin. 2003. Conjunction and Modification in Amis. MA thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu.Google Scholar
Starosta, Stanley. 1974. Causative verbs in Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics 13: 279–369.Google Scholar
Tsuchida, Shigeru. 1988. Amis. In Kamei, Takashi, Kono, Rokuro and Chino, Eiichi (eds.), The Sanseido Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol. 1: Languages of the World, Part One, 447–449. Tokyo: Sanseido Press.Google Scholar
Tsukida, Naomi. 2005. Seediq. In Adelaar, Alexander and Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. (eds.), The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar (Routledge Language Family Series), 291–325. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. (ed.). 1993. Advances in Role and Reference Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2005. Exploring the Syntax–Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. and LaPolla, Randy J.. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Samuel Hsu. 1976. The Syllable Structure of Fataan-Amis. MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.Google Scholar
Wu, Joy Jing-lan. 2003. Clausal modifiers in Amis. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics 29(2): 59–81.Google Scholar
Wu, Joy Jing-lan. 2006a. Verb Classification, Case Marking, and Grammatical Relations in Amis. PhD dissertation, University at Buffalo (SUNY).Google Scholar
Wu, Joy Jing-lan. 2006b. The analysis of pa- verbs in Amis. In Chang, Henry Y., Huang, Lillian M. and Ho, Dah-an (eds.), Streams Converging into an Ocean: Festschrift in Honor of Professor Paul Jen-kuei Li on his 70th Birthday (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series Number W-5). Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Yeh, Maya Yu-ting. 2015. An atypical SVC? A study of BLAQ UV qu’ NP construction in Atayal. In Zeitoun, Elizabeth, Teng, Stacy F. and Wu, Joy J. (eds.), New Advances in Formosan Linguistics, 131–155. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Zeitoun, Elizabeth. 1993. A semantic study of Tsou case markers. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 64(4): 969–989.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×