Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:20:17.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section II - Prosodic Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2021

Edited by
Rachael-Anne Knight  and
Jane Setter
Rachael-Anne Knight
Affiliation:
City, University of London
Jane Setter
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Phonetics , pp. 157 - 258
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

6.6 References

Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Abercrombie, D. (1976). Stress and some other terms. Work in Progress, 9, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University, 51–3.Google Scholar
Allen, G. D. (1972). The location of rhythmic stress beats in English: An experimental study II. Language and Speech, 15(2), 179–95.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, A. (2009). Rhythm, timing and the timing of rhythm. Phonetica, 66(1–2), 46–63.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, A. (2012). The usefulness of metrics in the quantification of speech rhythm. Journal of Phonetics, 40(3), 351–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanasopoulou, A. & Vogel, I. (2014). Compounds in Modern Greek. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 22(1).Google Scholar
Auer, P. & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1994). Rhythmus und tempo in konversationeller Alltagssprache. In Schlieben-Lange, B., ed. Rhythmus, Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 24(96), 78–106.Google Scholar
Auer, P., Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Müller, F. (1999). Language in Time: The Rhythm and Tempo of Spoken Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bååth, R. (2012). A new look at subjective rhythmisation. In Perspectives on Rhythm and Timing (PoRT): Book of Abstracts. University of Glasgow. www.sumsar.net/papers/rasmus_baath_PoRT_abstract.pdf.Google Scholar
Beckman, M. E. (1986). Stress and Non-Stress Accent. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beňuš, Š., Gravano, A. & Hirschberg, J. (2011). Pragmatic aspects of temporal accommodation in turn-taking. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(12), 3001–27.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M. (1989). Reflections on the dichotomy ‘stress’ vs. ’syllable-timing’. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée, 1989, 99–130Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M. & Bertini, C. (2010). Towards a unified predictive model of natural language rhythm. In Russo, M., ed., Prosodic Universals. Comparative Studies in Rhythmic Modeling and Rhythm Typology. Rome: Aracne, pp. 43–78.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1955). Intersections of stress and intonation. WORD, 11(2), 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1981). Two Kinds of Vowels, Two Kinds of Rhythm. Bloomington, IN: The Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1986). Intonation and Its Parts: Melody in Spoken English, Palo Alto. CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bunta, F. & Ingram, D. (2007). The acquisition of speech rhythm by bilingual Spanish- and English-speaking 4- and 5-year-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 999–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, N. & Beckman, M. (1997). Stress, prominence, and spectral tilt. In Intonation: Theory, Models and Applications. Proceedings of an ESCA Workshop. www.isca-speech.org/archive_open/int_97/inta_067.html.Google Scholar
Cauldwell, R. (2002). The functional irrhythmicality of spontaneous speech: A discourse view of speech rhythms. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies, 2(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Li, C., ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 25–55.Google Scholar
Chartrand, T. L. & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1993). A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(2), 239–97.Google Scholar
Clark, J., Yallop, C. & Fletcher, J. (2007). An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology, 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Classe, A. (1939/1978). The Rhythm of English Prose. London: Norwood Editions.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1991). A rhythm-based metric for turn-taking. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1, 275–8.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1993). English Speech Rhythm: Form and Function in Everyday Verbal Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2014). Prosody as dialogic interaction. In Barth-Weingarten, D. & Szczepek Reed, B., eds., Prosodie und Phonetik in der Interaktion – Prosody and Phonetics in Interaction. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung, pp. 229–59.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Auer, P. (1991). On the contextualizing function of speech rhythm in conversation: Question–answer sequences. In Verschueren, J., ed., Levels of Linguistic Adaptation: Selected Papers of the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp, 1987. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Cowley, S. (1994). Conversational functions of rhythmical patterning. Language and Communication, 14(4), 353–76.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1993). The de-accenting and re-accenting of repeated lexical items. In ESCA Workshop on Prosody. www.isca-speech.org/archive_open/archive_papers/prosody_93/pro3_016.pdf.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cummins, F. (2002). Speech rhythm and rhythmic taxonomy. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002. www.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2002/sp02_121.html.Google Scholar
Cummins, F. (2009). Rhythm as an affordance for the entrainment of movement. Phonetica, 66(1–2), 15–28.Google Scholar
Cummins, F. & Port, R. (1998). Rhythmic constraints on stress timing in English. Journal of Phonetics, 26(2), 145–71.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. & Clifton, C. E. (1984). The use of prosodic information in word recognition. In Bouma, H. & Bouwhuis, D. G., eds., Attention and Performance X. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 183–96.Google Scholar
D’Ausilio, A., Bartoli, E. & Maffongelli, L. (2015). Grasping synergies: A motor-control approach to the mirror neuron mechanism. Physics of Life Reviews, 12(1), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 51–62.Google Scholar
Dauer, R. M. (1987). Phonetic and phonological components of language rhythm. In Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, vol. 5, pp. 447–50.Google Scholar
de Jong, K. J. (1995). The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(1), 491–504.Google Scholar
Dell, F. (1984). L’accentuation dans les phrases en français. In Dell, F., Hirst, D. J. & Vergnaud, J. R., eds., Forme Sonore Du Langage. Paris: Herman, pp. 65–122.Google Scholar
Dellwo, V. (2006). Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for∆C. In Karnowski, P. & Szigeti, I., eds., Language and Language-Processing. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 231–41.Google Scholar
Deterding, D. (2001). The measurement of rhythm: A comparison of Singapore and British English. Journal of Phonetics, 29(2), 217–30.Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S. & Haspelmath, M., eds. (2013). WALS Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Echols, C. H., Crowhurst, M. J. & Childers, J. B. (1997). The perception of rhythmic units in speech by infants and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(2), 202–25.Google Scholar
Efron, D. (1941). Gesture and Environment: A Tentative Study of Some of the Spatio-temporal and Linguistic Aspects of the Gestural Behavior of Eastern Jews and Southern Italians in New York City, Living Under Similar as Well as Different Environmental Conditions. Columbia, NY: King’s Crown Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1999). Emotional and conversational nonverbal signals. In Messing, L. S. & Campbell, R., eds., Gesture, Speech, and Sign. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 39–50.Google Scholar
Erickson, F. (1992). They know all the lines: Rhythmic organization and contextualization in a conversational listing routine. In Auer, P. & di Luzio, A., eds., The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 365–97.Google Scholar
Eriksson, A. & Heldner, M. (2015). The acoustics of word stress in English as a function of stress level and speaking style. In 16th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH 2015). Dresden, pp. 41–5.Google Scholar
Féry, C. (2016). Intonation and Prosodic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Féry, C. & Krifka, M. (2008). Information structure: Notional distinctions, ways of expression. In van Sterkenburg, P., ed., Unity and Diversity of Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 123–35.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. (2010). The prosody of speech: Timing and rhythm. In Hardcastle, W. J., Laver, J. & Gibbon, F. E., eds., The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences. London: Blackwell, pp. 521–602.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. A. (1979). ‘Perceptual centers’ in speech production and perception. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 25(5), 375–88.Google Scholar
Fox, A. (2000). Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structure: The Phonology of Suprasegmentals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fraisse, P. (1963). The Psychology of Time. Translated by Jennifer Leith, New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
Fraisse, P. (1978). Time and rhythm perception. In Carterette, E. C. & Friedman, M. P., eds., Perceptual Coding. New York: Academic Press, pp. 203–54.Google Scholar
Fry, D. B. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27(4), 765–8.Google Scholar
Fry, D. B. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1(2), 126–52.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (2011). Stress: Phonotactic and phonetic evidence. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C. J., Hume, E. V. & Rice, K., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 2. London: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 924–48.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (2014). Disentangling stress and pitch-accent: A typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. In van der Hulst, H., ed., Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, M. & Roettger, T. (2017). Acoustic correlates of word stress: A cross-linguistic survey. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(1), 404.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. & van der Hulst, H. (in press). Word stress system. In Gussenhoven, C. & Chen, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language Prosody. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goedemans, R. W., Heinz, J. & van der Hulst, H. (2015). StressTyp2, version 1. http://st2.ullet.net.Google Scholar
Grabe, E. & Low, E. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In Gussenhoven, C. & Warner, N., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology 7. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 515–46.Google Scholar
Graham, C. (1978). Jazz Chants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grahn, J. A. (2012). Neural mechanisms of rhythm perception: current findings and future perspectives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 585–606.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (1984). On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1987). An Essay on Stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Harlig, J. & Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1988). Accentuation typology, word order and theme-rheme structure. In Hammond, M., Moravcsik, E. A. & Wirth, J., eds., Studies in Syntactic Typology, Vol. 17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 125–46.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1984). The phonology of rhythm in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 15(1), 33–74.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 253–306.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heinz, J., Goedemans, R. & van der Hulst, H. (2016). Dimensions of Phonological Stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hickok, G., Farahbod, H. & Saberi, K. (2015). The rhythm of perception: Entrainment to acoustic rhythms induces subsequent perceptual oscillation. Psychological Science, 26(7), 1006–13.Google Scholar
Hirst, D. & Di Cristo, A. (1998). Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (2006). Word-prosodic typology. Phonology, 23(2), 225–57.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (2014). Do all languages have word accent? In van der Hulst, H., ed., Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56–82.Google Scholar
Inkelas, S. (2011). The interaction between morphology and phonology. In Goldsmith, J., Riggle, J. & Yu, A. C. L., eds., The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 68–102.Google Scholar
James, A. L. (1940). Speech Signals in Telephony. London: Sir Pitman & Sons Limited.Google Scholar
Jassem, W. & Gibbon, D. (1980). Re-defining English accent and stress. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 10(1–2), 2–16.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tagpositioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica, 9, 47–96.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In D’Urso, V. & Leonardi, P., eds., Discourse Analysis and Natural Rhetoric. Padua: Cleup Editore, pp. 11–38.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1967). The Phoneme: Its Nature and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kager, R. (2007). Feet and metrical stress. In de Lacy, P., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 195–227.Google Scholar
Kingdon, R. (1958). The Groundword of English Stress. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. Linguistics in the Morning Calm: Selected Papers from SICOL-1981, 3–91.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (1978). The Structure of Intonational Meaning, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1967). Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P., Draper, M. H. & Whitteridge, D. (1958). Syllables and stress. Le Maître Phonétique, 36(73), 1–14.Google Scholar
Langus, A., Mehler, J. & Nespor, M. (2017). Rhythm in language acquisition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(Pt B), 158–66.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1994). Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1973). Rhythmic units and syntactic units in production and perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54(5), 1228–34.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1977). Isochrony reconsidered. Journal of Phonetics, 5(3), 253–63.Google Scholar
Leonard, T. & Cummins, F. (2011). The temporal relation between beat gestures and speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(10), 1457–71.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(2), 249–336.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. (1960). Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32(4), 451–4.Google Scholar
Loehr, D. (2007). Aspects of rhythm in gesture and speech. Gesture, 7(2), 179–214.Google Scholar
Loukina, A., Kochanski, G., Rosner, B., Keane, E. & Shih, C. (2011). Rhythm measures and dimensions of durational variation in speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(5), 3258–70.Google Scholar
McClave, E. (1994). Gestural beats: The rhythm hypothesis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23(1), 45–66.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (2012). The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Morton, J. & Jassem, W. (1965). Acoustic correlates of stress. Language and Speech, 8(3), 159–81.Google Scholar
Morton, J., Marcus, S. & Frankish, C. (1976). Perceptual centers (P-centers). Psychological Review, 83(5), 405–8.Google Scholar
Mukai, M. (2006). A Comparative Study of Compound Words in English, Japanese and Mainland Scandinavian. PhD thesis Newcastle University. Retrieved from https://theses.ncl.ac.uk/dspace/handle/10443/243.Google Scholar
Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J. & Mehler, J. (1998). Language discrimination by newborns: toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 756–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nespor, M. (1990). On the rhythm parameter in phonology. In Roca, I., ed., The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 157–75.Google Scholar
Nespor, M. & Vogel, I. (1989). On clashes and lapses. Phonology, 6(1), 69–116.Google Scholar
Nespor, M. & Vogel, I. (2007). Prosodic Phonology: With a New Foreword. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Newman, S. S. (1946). On the stress system of English. WORD, 2(3), 171–87.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. & Asu, E. L. (2009). The Pairwise Variability Index and coexisting rhythms in language. Phonetica, 66(1–2), 64–77.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. & Jeon, H. S. (2014). Speech rhythm: A metaphor? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369(1658), 20130396.Google Scholar
O’Connor, J. D. & Arnold, G. F. (1973). Intonation of Colloquial English: A Practical Handbook. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ogden, R. & Hawkins, S. (2015). Entrainment as a basis for co-ordinated actions in speech. In Proceedings of International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences. University of Glasgow. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/88780/.Google Scholar
Ordin, M. & Polyanskaya, L. (2014). Development of timing patterns in first and second languages. System, 42, 244–57.Google Scholar
Ortiz Lira, H. (1998). Word Stress and Sentence Accent. Santiago de Chile: Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de La Educación.Google Scholar
Palmer, H. E. (1924). English Intonation with Systematic Exercises. London: W. Heffer & Sons.Google Scholar
Payne, E., Post, B., Astruc, L., Prieto, P. & Vanrell, M. del M. (2012). Measuring child rhythm. Language and Speech, 55(Pt 2), 203–29.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1945). The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Publications.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–225.Google Scholar
Port, R. F., Dalby, J. & O’Dell, M. (1987). Evidence for mora timing in Japanese.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81(5), 1574–85.Google Scholar
Poser, W. J. (1984). The Phonetics and Phonology of Tone and Intonation in Japanese. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/15169/14709025-MIT.pdf?sequence=2.Google Scholar
Prince, A. (1989). Metrical forms. In Kiparsky, P. & Youmans, G., eds., Rhythm and Meter. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 45–80.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., Nespor, M. & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73(3), 265–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramus, F., Dupoux, E. & Mehler, J. (2003). The psychological reality of rhythm classes: Perceptual studies. Cogprints. http://cogprints.org/3079/.Google Scholar
Roach, P. (1982). On the distinction between ‘stress-timed’ and ‘syllable-timed’ languages. In Crystal, D., ed., Linguistic Controversies, London: Edward Arnold, pp. 73–9.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some gestures’ relation to talk. In Atkinson, J. H. J., ed., Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 266–95.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech, 41(3/4), 235–63.Google Scholar
Schmerling, S. F. (1976). Aspects of English Sentence Stress. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Scott, S. K. (1998). The point of P-centres. Psychological Research, 6, 1–4.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (2011). The syntax–phonology interface. In Goldsmith, J., Riggle, J. & Yu, A. C. L., eds., The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 435–83.Google Scholar
Sluijter, A. (1995). Phonetic Correlates of Stress and Accent. PhD thesis, Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10022502005/.Google Scholar
Sluijter, A. M. & van Heuven, V. J. (1996). Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100(4 Pt 1), 2471–85.Google Scholar
Stetson, R. H. (1928). Motor Phonetics: A Study of Speech Movements in Action, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Szczepek Reed, B. (2006). Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Szczepek Reed, B. (2009). Prosodic orientation: A practice for sequence organization in broadcast telephone openings. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(6), 1223–47.Google Scholar
Szczepek Reed, B. (2010). Speech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-cultural talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 1037–59.Google Scholar
Szczepek Reed, B. (2011). Analysing Conversation: An Introduction to Prosody, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Szczepek Reed, B. (2012a). Beyond the particular: Prosody and the coordination of actions. Language and Speech, 55(1), 12–33.Google Scholar
Szczepek Reed, B. (2012b). A conversation analytic perspective on teaching English pronunciation: The case of speech rhythm. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 67–87.Google Scholar
Teschner, R. V. & Whitley, M. S. (2004). Pronouncing English: A Stress-Based Approach. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Thaut, M. H., Trimarchi, P. D. & Parsons, L. M. (2014). Human brain basis of musical rhythm perception: common and distinct neural substrates for meter, tempo, and pattern. Brain Sciences, 4(2), 428–52.Google Scholar
Tilsen, S. & Arvaniti, A. (2013). Speech rhythm analysis with decomposition of the amplitude envelope: characterizing rhythmic patterns within and across languages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(1), 628–39.Google Scholar
Trager, G. L. & Smith, H. L. (1951). An Outline of English Structure. Oklahoma, OK: Battenberg Press.Google Scholar
Trouvain, J. & Gut, U., eds. (2007). Non-Native Prosody: Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van der Hulst, H. (2014a). Representing rhythm. In van der Hulst, H., ed., Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 325–65.Google Scholar
Van der Hulst, H. (2014b). The study of word accent and stress: past, present, and future. In van der Hulst, H., ed., Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–55.Google Scholar
Vaughan-Rees, M. (2010). Rhymes and Rhythm: A Poem-based Course for English Pronunciation. Reading: Garnet Education.Google Scholar
Vos, P. G., Mates, J. & van Kruysbergen, N. W. (1995). The perceptual centre of a stimulus as the cue for synchronization to a metronome: Evidence from asynchronies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 48(4), 1024–40.Google Scholar
White, L. & Mattys, S. L. (2007). Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics, 35(4), 501–22.Google Scholar
Wiget, L., White, L., Schuppler, B., Grenon, I., Rauch, O. & Mattys, S. L. (2010). How stable are acoustic metrics of contrastive speech rhythm? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(3), 1559–69.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. & Wilson, T. P. (2005). An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 957–68.Google Scholar
Woodrow, H. (1951). Time perception. In Stevens, S. S., ed., Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley, pp. 1224–36.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, T. P. & West, D. H. (1986). The structure of silence between turns in two-party conversation. Discourse Processes, 9, 375–90.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. & Vergnaud, J. R. (2006). Phrasal stress and syntax. In Everaert, M. & Riemsdijk, H. van, eds., The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 522–68.Google Scholar

7.6 References

Abberton, E. R. M. & Fourcin, A. J. (1997). Electrolaryngography. In Ball, M. J. & Code, C., eds., Instrumental Clinical Phonetics. London: Whurr, pp. 119–48.Google Scholar
Abramson, A. S., Luangthongkum, T. & Nye, P. W. (2004). Voice register in Suai (Kuai): An analysis of perceptual and acoustic data. Phonetica, 61, 147–71.Google Scholar
Alzaidi, M. S., Xu, Y. & Xu, A. (2019). Prosodic encoding of focus in Hijazi Arabic. Speech Communication, 106, 127–49.Google Scholar
Arantes, P. (2015). Time-normalization of fundamental frequency contours: A hands-on tutorial. In Meireles, A. R., ed., Courses on Speech Prosody. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 98–123.Google Scholar
Archangeli, D. B., Yip, J. C.-K., Qin, L. & Lee, A. (2017). Phonological and phonetic properties of nasal substitution in Sasak and Javanese. Laboratory Phonology, 8(21), 1–27.Google Scholar
Bates, D. M., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M. & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.Google Scholar
Bauer, R. S., Cheung, K. H. & Cheung, P. M. (2003). Variation and merger of the rising tones in Hong Kong Cantonese. Language Variation and Change, 15(2), 211–25.Google Scholar
Bidelman, G. M. & Krishnan, A. (2010). Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians. Brain Research, 1335, 112–25.Google Scholar
Bidelman, G. M., Gandour, J. T. & Krishnan, A. (2011). Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch. Brain and Cognition, 77, 1–10.Google Scholar
Brunelle, M. (2009). Tone perception in Northern and Southern Vietnamese. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 79–96.Google Scholar
Brunelle, M. & Kirby, J. P. (2016). Tone and phonation in Southeast Asian languages. Linguistics and Language Compass, 10(4), 191–207.Google Scholar
Brunelle, M., Nguyễn, D. D. & Nguyễn, K. H. (2010). A laryngographic and laryngoscopic study of Northern Vietnamese tones. Phonetica, 67(3), 147–69.Google Scholar
Cao, J. & Maddieson, I. (1992). An exploration of phonation types in Wu dialects of Chinese. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 77–92.Google Scholar
Chao, Y.-R. (1980). A system of tone letters. Fangyan [方言], (2), 81–3.Google Scholar
Chen, M. Y. (2000). Tone Sandhi: Patterns across Chinese Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, S., Wiltshire, C. R. & Li, B. (2017a). Statistical modeling of Mandarin tone sandhi: Neutralization of underlying pitch targets. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 11(5), 1119–24.Google Scholar
Chen, S., Zhang, C., McCollum, A. G. & Wayland, R. P. (2017b). Statistical modelling of phonetic and phonologised perturbation effects in tonal and non-tonal languages. Speech Communication, 88, 17–38.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. & Xu, Y. (2006). Production of weak elements in speech: Evidence from f0 patterns of neutral tone in Standard Chinese. Phonetica, 63(1), 47–75.Google Scholar
Cheng, C., Xu, Y. & Gubian, M. (2010). Exploring the mechanism of tonal contraction in Taiwan Mandarin. In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2010, Makuhari, Japan, pp. 2010–13.Google Scholar
Cheng, C., Chen, J.-Y. & Gubian, M. (2013). Are Mandarin sandhi Tone 3 and Tone 2 the same or different? The results of Functional Data Analysis. In Proceedings of the 27th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation (PACLIC-27), Taipei, pp. 296–301.Google Scholar
Collier, R. (1975). Physiological correlates of intonation patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58(1), 249–56.Google Scholar
Colton, R. H. & Conture, E. G. (1990). Problems and pitfalls of electroglottography. Journal of Voice, 4(1), 10–24.Google Scholar
Connell, B. (2002). Tone languages and the universality of intrinsic f0: Evidence from Africa. Journal of Phonetics, 30(1), 101–29.Google Scholar
Connell, B. (2011). Downstep. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C. J., Hume, E. & Rice, K. D., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 824–47.Google Scholar
Connell, B. & Ladd, D. R. (1990). Aspects of pitch realisation in Yoruba. Phonology, 7(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. & Wang, Y. (2013). Effects of tone training on Cantonese tone-word learning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(2), EL133–EL139.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, 6th ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Curran, P. J., Obeidat, K. & Losardo, D. (2010). Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(2), 121–36.Google Scholar
Davidson, L. S. (2006). Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(1), 407–15.Google Scholar
Deutsch, D., Henthorn, T., Marvin, E. & Xu, H. (2006). Absolute pitch among American and Chinese conservatory students: Prevalence differences, and evidence for a speech-related critical period. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(2), 719–22.Google Scholar
Diehl, R. L. & Kluender, K. R. (1989). On the objects of speech perception. Ecological Psychology, 1(2), 121–44.Google Scholar
Docherty, G. J., González Ochoa, S. D. & Mitchell, N. (2015).Static vs. dynamic perspectives on the realization of vowel nuclei in West Australian English. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2015), Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar
Esposito, C. M. (2012). An acoustic and electroglottographic study of White Hmong tone and phonation. Journal of Phonetics, 40(3), 466–76.Google Scholar
Faaborg-Andersen, K. & Buchthal, F. (1956). Action potentials from internal laryngeal muscles during phonation. Nature, 177, 340–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franich, K. (2015). The effect of cognitive load on tonal coarticulation. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2015), Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar
Fujisaki, H. & Hirose, K. (1984). Analysis of voice fundamental frequency contours for declarative sentences of Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan [日本音響学会誌], 5(4), 233–42.Google Scholar
Fujisaki, H., Wang, C., Ohno, S. & Gu, W. (2005). Analysis and synthesis of fundamental frequency contours of Standard Chinese using the Command-Response Model. Speech Communication, 47(1–2), 59–70.Google Scholar
Gandour, J. T. (1977). On the interaction between tone and vowel length: Evidence from Thai dialects. Phonetica, 34, 54–65.Google Scholar
Gandour, J. T., Potisuk, S. & Dechongkit, S. (1994). Tonal coarticulation in Thai. Journal of Phonetics, 22, 477–92.Google Scholar
Gick, B. W. (2002). The use of ultrasound for linguistic phonetic fieldwork. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 32(2), 113–21.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. K. & Ladefoged, P. N. (2001). Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 383–406.Google Scholar
Gu, C. (2014). Smoothing spline ANOVA models: R package gss. Journal of Statistical Software, 58(5), 1–25.Google Scholar
Gu, W. & Lee, T. (2009). Effects of tone and emphatic focus on f0 contours of Cantonese speech: A comparison with Standard Chinese. Chinese Journal of Phonetics, 2, 133–47.Google Scholar
Gu, W., Hirose, K. & Fujisaki, H. (2007). Analysis of tones in Cantonese speech based on the Command-Response Model. Phonetica, 64(1), 29–62.Google Scholar
Gubian, M., Torreira, F. & Boves, L. (2015). Using Functional Data Analysis for investigating multidimensional dynamic phonetic contrasts. Journal of Phonetics, 49, 16–40.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. H. M. (2004). The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hallé, P. A. (1994). Evidence for tone-specific activity of the sternohyoid muscle in Modern Standard Chinese. Language and Speech, 37(2), 103–24.Google Scholar
’t Hart, J., Collier, R. & Cohen, A. (1990). A Perceptual Study of Intonation: An Experimental-Phonetic Approach to Speech Melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herbst, C. T. & Ternström, S. (2006). A comparison of different methods to measure the EGG contact quotient. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 31, 126–38.Google Scholar
Herman, R., Beckman, M. E. & Honda, K. (1996). Subglottal pressure and final lowering in English. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1996), Philadelphia, PA, pp. 145–8.Google Scholar
Hombert, J.-M. (1977a). Consonant types, vowel height and tone in Yoruba. Studies in African Linguistics, 8(2), 173–90.Google Scholar
Hombert, J.-M. (1977b). Development of tones from vowel height? Journal of Phonetics, 5, 9–16.Google Scholar
Honda, K. (1995). Laryngeal and extra-laryngeal mechanisms of f0 control. In Bell-Berti, F. & Raphael, L. J., eds., Producing Speech: Contemporary Issues. New York: American Institute of Physics, pp. 215–32.Google Scholar
Honda, K., Hirai, H., Masaki, S. & Shimada, Y. (1999). Role of vertical larynx movement and cervical lordosis in f0 control. Language and Speech, 42(4), 401–11.Google Scholar
Huckvale, M. A. (2016). Using web audio to deliver interactive speech tools in the browser. Phonetician, 111, 70–85.Google Scholar
Huckvale, M. A., Brookes, D. M., Dworkin, L. T., Johnson, M. E., Pearce, D. J. & Whitaker, L. (1987). The SPAR speech filing system. In European Conference on Speech Technology, Edinburgh, pp. 1305–8.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. & Schuh, R. G. (1974). Universals of tone rules: Evidence from West Africa. Linguistic Inquiry, 5(1), 81–115.Google Scholar
Kaisse, E. M. (2006). Sandhi. In Brown, K., ed., Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 740–1.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. P. (2011). Illustrations of the IPA: Vietnamese (Hanoi). Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41(3), 381–92.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. P. & Ladd, D. R. (2016a). Effects of obstruent voicing on vowel f0: Evidence from ‘true voicing’ languages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(4), 2400–11.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. P. & Ladd, D. R. (2016b). Tone–melody correspondence in Vietnamese popular song. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (TAL 2016), Buffalo, NY, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
Kong, Q. (1987). Influence of tones upon vowel duration in Cantonese. Language and Speech, 30(4), 387–400.Google Scholar
Krifka, M. (2008). Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3), 243–76.Google Scholar
Kuang, J. (2013). The tonal space of contrastive five level tones. Phonetica, 70(1–2), 1–23.Google Scholar
Kwon, K.-K. (2003). Prosodic change from tone to vowel length in Korean. In Fikkert, J. P. M. & Jacobs, H., eds., Development in Prosodic Systems. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 67–89.Google Scholar
Laniran, Y. O. (1992). Intonation in Tone Languages: The Phonetic Implementation of Tones in Yoruba. PhD thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Laniran, Y. O. & Clements, G. N. (2003). Downstep and high raising: Interacting factors in Yoruba tone production. Journal of Phonetics, 31(2), 203–50.Google Scholar
Laniran, Y. O. & Gerfen, C. (1997). High raising, downstep and downdrift in Igbo. Paper presented at the 71st Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Law, S.-P., Fung, S. Y. R. & Kung, C. (2013). An ERP study of good production vis-à-vis poor perception of tones in Cantonese: Implications for top-down speech processing. PLOS ONE, 8(e54396), 1–9.Google Scholar
Lee-Kim, S.-I. (2014). Revisiting Mandarin ‘apical vowels’: An articulatory and acoustic study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 44(3), 261–82.Google Scholar
Lee, A. & Xu, Y. (2016). Effect of speech rate on pre-low raising in Cantonese. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (TAL 2016), Buffalo, NY, pp. 75–9.Google Scholar
Lee, A., Prom-on, S. & Xu, Y. (2017). Pre-low raising in Japanese pitch accent. Phonetica, 74(4), 231–46.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.-C., Wang, T. & Liberman, M. Y. (2016). Production and perception of tone 3 focus in Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1058), 1–13.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Tao, J., Lai, W. & Xu, X. (2017). Quantitative intonation modeling of interrogative sentences for Mandarin speech synthesis. Speech Communication, 89, 92–102.Google Scholar
List, G. (1961). Speech melody and song melody in Central Thailand. Ethnomusicology, 5(1), 16–32.Google Scholar
Liu, F. (1925). Étude expérimentale sur les tons du chinois. Paris: Société d’édition Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Liu, F., Jiang, C., Thompson, W. F., Xu, Y., Yang, Y. & Stewart, L. (2012). The mechanism of speech processing in congenital amusia: Evidence from Mandarin speakers. PLOS ONE, 7(e30374), 1–11.Google Scholar
Liu, M., Chen, Y. & Schiller, N. O. (2016). Online processing of tone and intonation in Mandarin: Evidence from ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 91, 307–17.Google Scholar
Liu, S. & Samuel, A. G. (2004). Perception of Mandarin lexical tones when f0 information is neutralized. Language and Speech, 47(2), 109–38.Google Scholar
Loucks, T. M. J., Poletto, C. J., Saxon, K. G. & Ludlow, C. L. (2005). Laryngeal muscle responses to mechanical displacement of the thyroid cartilage in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology, 99, 922–30.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. (2005). Tone. In Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D. & Comrie, B., eds., The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 58–61.Google Scholar
Miller, A. L. & Finch, K. B. (2011). Corrected high-frame rate anchored ultrasound with software alignment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 471–86.Google Scholar
Mirman, D. (2014). Growth Curve Analysis and Visualization Using R, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Moisik, S. R., Lin, H. & Esling, J. H. (2014). A study of laryngeal gestures in Mandarin citation tones using simultaneous laryngoscopy and laryngeal ultrasound (SLLUS). Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 44(1), 21–58.Google Scholar
Mok, P. K. P. & Zuo, D. (2012). The separation between music and speech: Evidence from the perception of Cantonese tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(4), 2711–20.Google Scholar
Mok, P. K. P., Zuo, D. & Wong, W. Y. P. (2013). Production and perception of a sound change in progress: Tone merging in Hong Kong Cantonese. Language Variation and Change, 25(3), 341–70.Google Scholar
Myers, J. T. & Tsay, J. S.-C. (2008). Neutralization in Taiwan Southern Min tone sandhi. In Hsiao, Y. E., Hsu, H.-C., Wee, L.-H. & Ho, D.-A., eds., Interfaces in Chinese Phonology: Festschrift in Honor of Matthew Y. Chen on his 70th birthday [漢語音韻介面：陳淵泉先生七秩壽慶論文集]. Taipei: Academia Sinica, p. 2411.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1978). Production of tone. In Fromkin, V. A., ed., Tone: A Linguistic Survey. New York: Academic Press, pp. 5–39.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. & Eukel, B. (1987). Explaining the intrinsic pitch of vowels. In Channon, R. & Shockey, L., eds., In Honor of Ilse Lehiste, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 207–15.Google Scholar
Ohde, R. N. (1984). Fundamental frequency as an acoustic correlate of stop consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75(1), 224–30.Google Scholar
Payne, J. K., Higenbottam, T. W. & Guindi, G. M. (1980). A surface electrode for laryngeal electromyography. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 43, 853–4.Google Scholar
Peng, S.-H. (2000). Lexical versus ‘phonological’ representations of Mandarin sandhi tones. In Broe, M. B. & Pierrehumbert, J. B., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152–67.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). The Finnish possessive suffixes. Language, 56(3), 603–21.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1948). Tone Languages. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Prom-on, S., Xu, Y. & Thipakorn, B. (2009). Modeling tone and intonation in Mandarin and English as a process of target approximation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(1), 405–24.Google Scholar
Prom-on, S., Liu, F. & Xu, Y. (2012). Post-low bouncing in Mandarin Chinese: Acoustic analysis and computational modeling. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(1), 421–32.Google Scholar
Prom-on, S., Xu, Y., Gu, W., Arvaniti, A., Nam, H. & Whalen, D. H. (2016). The Common Prosody Platform (CPP): Where theories of prosody can be directly compared. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Speech Prosody (SP2016), Boston, MA, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Ramsay, J. O. & Silverman, B. W. (2005). Functional Data Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Rialland, A. (1981). Le système tonal du gurma (langue gur de Haute-Volta). Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, 3, 39–64.Google Scholar
Rialland, A. (2009). The African lax question prosody: Its realisation and geographical distribution. Lingua, 119(6), 928–49.Google Scholar
Sagart, L., Hallé, P. A., de Boysson-Bardies, B. & Arabia-Guidet, C. (1986). Tone production in Modern Standard Chinese: An electromyographic investigation. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale, 15(2), 205–21.Google Scholar
Saitou, T., Unoki, M. & Akagi, M. (2005). Development of an f0 control model based on f0 dynamic characteristics for singing-voice synthesis. Speech Communication, 46(3–4), 405–17.Google Scholar
Sapir, S. (1989). The intrinsic pitch of vowels: Theoretical, physiological, and clinical considerations. Journal of Voice, 3(1), 44–51.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, M. H. (2009). Singing in a tone language: Shona. In Ojo, A. & Moshi, L., eds., Selected Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: Linguistic Research and Languages in Africa, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 137–44.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, M. H. (2012). Does language determine music in tone languages? Ethnomusicology, 56(2), 266–78.Google Scholar
Shadle, C. H. (1985). Intrinsic fundamental frequency of vowels in sentence context. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78(5), 1562–7.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. D., Blankenship, B., Kirk, P. & Ladefoged, P. N. (1995). Phonetic structures in Jalapa Mazatec. Anthropological Linguistics, 37(1), 70–88.Google Scholar
Snider, K. L. (1998). Phonetic realisation of downstep in Bimoba. Phonology, 15, 77–101.Google Scholar
Srisuwan, N., Phukpattaranont, P. & Limsakul, C. (2012). Feature selection for Thai tone classification based on surface EMG. Procedia Engineering, 32, 253–9.Google Scholar
Steele, S. A. (1986). Interaction of vowel f0 and prosody. Phonetica, 43, 92–105.Google Scholar
Stepp, C. E. (2012). Surface electromyography for speech and swallowing systems: Measurement, analysis, and interpretation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 1232–47.Google Scholar
Talkin, D. (1995). A robust algorithm for pitch tracking (RAPT). In W. B. Kleijn and K. K. Paliwal, eds., Speech Coding and Synthesis. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 495–518.Google Scholar
Titze, I. R., Baken, R. J., Bozeman, K. W., et al. (2015). Toward a consensus on symbolic notation of harmonics, resonances, and formants in vocalization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(5), 3005–7.Google Scholar
Tsanas, A., Zañartu, M., Little, M. A., Fox, C., Ramig, L. O. & Clifford, G. D. (2014). Robust fundamental frequency estimation in sustained vowels: Detailed algorithmic comparisons and information fusion with adaptive Kalman filtering. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(5), 2885–901.Google Scholar
Ullah, S. & Finch, C. F. (2013). Applications of functional data analysis: A systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(43), 1–12.Google Scholar
Vieira, M. N. (2015). Electroglottography. In Meireles, A. R., ed., Courses on Speech Prosody. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 52–97.Google Scholar
Whalen, D. H. & Levitt, A. G. (1995). The universality of intrinsic f0 of vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 27(2), 349–66.Google Scholar
Wong, P. C. M. & Diehl, R. L. (2002). How can the lyrics of a song in a tone language be understood. Psychology of Music, 30, 202–9.Google Scholar
Wong, P. C. M. & Diehl, R. L. (2003). Inter- and intratalker variation in Cantonese level tones. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 413–22.Google Scholar
Wong, W. Y. P., Chan, M. K. M. & Beckman, M. E. (2005). An Autosegmental-Metrical analysis and prosodic annotation conventions for Cantonese. In Jun, S.-A., ed., Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, Vol. C, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 271–300.Google Scholar
Wu, W.-L. (2013). Cantonese Prosody: Sentence-Final Particles and Prosodic Focus. PhD thesis, University College London.Google Scholar
Xu, C. X. & Xu, Y. (2003). Effects of consonant aspiration on Mandarin tones. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 33(2), 165–81.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (1993). Contextual Tonal Variations in Mandarin. PhD thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (1997). Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics, 25(1), 61–83.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (1999). Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0 contours. Journal of Phonetics, 27(1), 55–105.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (2005). Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions. Speech Communication, 46(3–4), 220–51.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (2013). ProsodyPro: A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. In Proceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody (TRASP 2013), Aix-en-Provence, France, pp. 7–10.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. & Sun, X. (2002). Maximum speed of pitch change and how it may relate to speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(3), 1399–413.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. & Wang, Q. E. (2001). Pitch targets and their realization: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Speech Communication, 33(4), 319–37.Google Scholar
Xu, Y., Chen, S.-W. & Wang, B. (2012). Prosodic focus with and without post-focus compression: A typological divide within the same language family? Linguistic Review, 29(1), 131–47.Google Scholar
Yip, M. J. W. (2002). Tone. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yu, K. M. & Lam, H. W. (2014). The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tonal perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(3), 1320–33.Google Scholar
Yu, S., Lee, T. & Ng, M. L. (2016). Surface electromyographic activity of extrinsic laryngeal muscles in Cantonese tone production. Journal of Signal Processing Systems, 82(2), 287–94.Google Scholar
Yung, B. (1983). Creative process in Cantonese opera I: The role of linguistic tones. Ethnomusicology, 27(1), 29–47.Google Scholar
Zhang, J. (2004). The role of contrast-specific and language-specific phonetics in contour tone distribution. In Hayes, B. P., Kirchner, R. M. & Steriade, D., eds., Phonetically Based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–90.Google Scholar
Zhu, X. & Wang, C. (2015). Tone. In Wang, W. S.-Y. & Sun, C., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 503–15.Google Scholar

8.7 References

Arvaniti, A. (2016). Analytical decisions in intonation research and the role of representations: Lessons from Romani. Laboratory Phonology, 7(1), 6.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, A., Ladd, D. R. & Mennen, I. (1998). Stability of tonal alignment: The case of Greek prenuclear accents. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 3–25.Google Scholar
Astruc, L., Prieto, P., Payne, E., Post, B. & Vanrell, M. d. M. (2009). Acquisition of tonal targets in Catalan, Spanish, and English. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 5, 1–14.Google Scholar
Atterer, M. & Ladd, D. R. (2004). On the phonetics and phonology of ‘segmental anchoring’ of f0: Evidence from German. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 177–97.Google Scholar
Bänziger, T. & Scherer, K. (2005). The role of intonation in emotional expressions. Speech Communication, 46, 252–67.Google Scholar
Beckman, M. & Pierrehumbert, J. (1986). Intonational structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255–310.Google Scholar
Beckman, M., Hirschberg, J. & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2005). The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Jun, S.-A., ed., Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–54.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2020). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [computer program]. Version 6.1.30, www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1978). Intonation across languages. In Greenberg, J. H., Ferguson, C. A. & Moravcsik, E. A., eds., Universals of Human Language. Volume II: Phonology. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 471–524.Google Scholar
Breen, M., Fedorenko, E., Wagner, M. & Gibson, E. (2010). Acoustic correlates of information structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7–9), 1044–98.Google Scholar
Bruce, G. (1977). Swedish Word Accents in Sentence Perspective. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Bruce, G. & Gårding, E. (1978). A prosodic typology for Swedish dialects. In Gårding, E., Bruce, G. & Bannert, R., eds., Nordic Prosody. Lund: Gleerup, pp. 219–28.Google Scholar
Brugos, A., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. & Veilleux, N. (2006). Transcribing Prosodic Structure of Spoken Utterances with ToBI. MIT Open Courseware. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-911-transcribing-prosodic-structure-of-spoken-utterances-with-tobi-january-iap-2006/.Google Scholar
Büring, D. (2009). Towards a typology of focus realization. In Féry, C. & Zimmermann, M., eds., Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological, and Experimental Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 177–205.Google Scholar
Calhoun, S. (2007). Information Structure and the Prosodic Structure of English: a Probabilistic Relationship. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Calhoun, S. (2010). The centrality of metrical structure in signaling information structure: A probabilistic perspective. Language, 86(1), 1–42.Google Scholar
Calhoun, S. (2015). The interaction of prosody and syntax in Samoan focus marking. Lingua, 165(B), 205–29.Google Scholar
Calhoun, S. & Schweitzer, A. (2012). Can intonation contours be lexicalised? Implications for discourse meanings. In Elordieta, G. & Prieto, P., eds., Prosody and Meaning (Interface Explorations 25). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 271‒327.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. & Gussenhoven, C. (2008). Emphasis and tonal implementation in Standard Chinese. Journal of Phonetics, 36(4), 724–46.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Lee, P. P.-L. & Pan, H. (2016). Topic and focus marking in Chinese. In Féry, C. & Ishihara, S., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clifton, C., Carlson, K. & Frazier, L. (2002). Informative prosodic boundaries. Language and Speech, 45(2), 87–114.Google Scholar
Cole, J. (2015). Prosody in context: A review. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(1–2), 1‒31.Google Scholar
Cole, J. & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2016). New methods for prosodic transcription: Capturing variability as a source of information. Laboratory Phonology, 7(1).Google Scholar
Cole, J., Mo, Y. & Hasegawa-Johnson, M. (2010). Signal-based and expectation-based factors in the perception of prosodic prominence. Laboratory Phonology, 1(2), 425–52.Google Scholar
Cooper, W., Eady, S. & Mueller, P. (1985). Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question–answer contexts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, 2142–56.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (2014). Gimson’s Pronunciation of English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cruz, M., Swerts, M. & Frota, S. (2017). The role of intonation and visual cues in the perception of sentence types: Evidence from European Portuguese varieties. Laboratory Phonology, 8(1), 23.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1969). Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (1990). Exploiting prosodic probabilities in speech segmentation. In Altmann, G. T. M., ed., Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 105–21.Google Scholar
D’Imperio, M., Nguyen, N. & Munhall, K. G. (2003). An articulatory hypothesis for the alignment of tonal targets in Italian. In Solé, M. J., Recasens, D. & Romero, J., eds., Proceedings of 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Rundle Mall: Causal Productions, pp. 253–6.Google Scholar
D’Imperio, M., Cangemi, F. & Grice, M. (2016). Introducing advancing prosodic transcription. Laboratory Phonology, 7(1), 4.Google Scholar
Dalton, M. & Ní Chasaide, A. (2005). Tonal alignment in Irish dialects. Language and Speech, 48, 441‒64.Google Scholar
Dominguez, M., Farrus, M. & Wanner, L. (2016). An automatic prosody tagger for spontaneous speech. In COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Osaka, Japan: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 377–86.Google Scholar
Downing, L. J. & Pompino-Marschall, B. (2013). The focus prosody of Chichewa and the Stress-Focus constraint: a response to Samek-Lodovici (2005). Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 31(3), 647–81.Google Scholar
Eady, S. & Cooper, W. (1986). Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80(2), 402–15.Google Scholar
Eady, S., Cooper, W., Klouda, G., Mueller, P. & Lotts, D. (1986). Acoustical characteristics of sentential focus: Narrow vs. broad and single vs. dual focus environments. Language and Speech, 29, 233–51.Google Scholar
Elfner, E. (2012). Syntax–Prosody Interactions in Irish. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA.Google Scholar
Féry, C. (2013). Focus as prosodic alignment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31(3), 683–734.Google Scholar
Féry, C. & Schubö, F. (2010). Hierarchical prosodic structures in the intonation of center-embedded relative clauses. The Linguistic Review, 27, 289–313.Google Scholar
Frota, S. (2002). Tonal association and target alignment in European Portuguese nuclear falls. In Gussenhoven, C. & Warner, N., eds., Laboratory Phonology 7, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 387–418.Google Scholar
Fujisaki, H. (1983). Dynamic characteristics of voice fundamental frequency in speech and singing. In MacNeilage, P. F., ed., The Production of Speech. New York: Springer, pp. 39–55.Google Scholar
Grabe, E. (1998). Pitch accent realization in English and German. Journal of Phonetics, 26(2), 129‒43.Google Scholar
Grice, M., Ladd, D. R. & Arvaniti, A. (2000). On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology. Phonology, 17, 143‒85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (1984). On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2002). Intonation and interpretation: Phonetics and phonology. In Bel, B. & Marlien, I., eds., Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage, pp. 47‒57.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Intonation and Grammar in British English. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hanssen, J. (2017). Regional Variation in the Realisation of Intonation Contours in the Netherlands. Utrecht: LOT dissertations.Google Scholar
’t Hart, J., Collier, R. & Cohen, A. (1990). A Perceptual Study of Intonation: An Experimental-Phonetic Approach to Speech Melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hermes, D. J. (2006). Stylization of pitch contours. In Sudhoff, S., Lenertova, D., Meyer, R., Pappert, S., Augurzky, P., Mleinek, I., Richter, N. & Schließer, J., eds., Methods in Empirical Prosody Research. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 29–62.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. & Ladd, D. R. (2008). Prosodic description: An introduction for fieldworkers. Language Documentation & Conservation, 2(2), 244–74.Google Scholar
Hirschberg, J. & Ward, G. (1992). The influence of pitch range, duration, amplitude and spectral features on the interpretation of the rise-fall-rise intonation contour in English. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 241–51.Google Scholar
Hirst, D. J. (2005). Form and function in the representation of speech prosody. Speech Communication, 46(3–4), 334–47.Google Scholar
Hirst, D. J. & Di Cristo, A. (1998). A survey of intonation systems. In Hirst, D. J. & Di Cristo, A., eds., Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–43.Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I. (1999). Basque accentuation. In van der Hulst, H., ed., Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 947–93.Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I. & Prieto, P. (2016). Towards an International Phonetic Alphabet (IPrA). Laboratory Phonology, 7(1), 5.Google Scholar
Ipek, C. (2015). The Phonology and Phonetics of Turkish Intonation. PhD thesis, University of Southern California, USA.Google Scholar
Ito, K., Turnbull, R. & Speer, S. (2017). Allophonic tunes of contrast: Lab and spontaneous speech lead to equivalent fixation responses in museum visitors. Laboratory Phonology, 8(1), 6.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, A. (2016). A first look at declarative rises as markers of ethnicity in Sydney. In Barnes, J., Brugos, A., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. & Vieilleux, N., eds., Speech Prosody 2016. Boston, MA, pp. 143–7.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A. (1998). The accentual phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology, 15, 189–226.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A. (2005a). Korean intonational phonology and prosodic transcription. In Jun, S.-A., ed., Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 201–29.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A., ed. (2005b). Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A. (2014a). Prosodic typology: By prominence type, word prosody and macro-rhythm. In Jun, S.-A., ed., Prosodic Typology II: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 520–40.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A., ed. (2014b). Prosodic Typology II: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, S.-A. & Kim, H.-S. (2007). VP focus and narrow focus in Korean. In Trouvain, J. & Barry, W. J., eds., Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, pp. 1277–80.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A. & Lee, H.-J. (1998). Phonetic and phonological markers of corrective focus in Korean. In Mannell, R. H. & Robert-Ribes, J., eds., Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP-98). Sydney: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association, pp. 1295–8.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A. & Prieto, P. (2018). Usages and advantages of categorical phonetic transcription of prosody: Toward the development of an IPrA (International Prosodic Alphabet). In Speech Prosody 2018, Poznań, Poland. https://linguistics.ucla.edu/ipra_workshop/.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A., Hualde, J. & Prieto, P. (2015). Workshop on Developing an International Prosodic Alphabet (IPrA) within the AM framework., International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow. https://linguistics.ucla.edu/ipra_workshop/.Google Scholar
Kakouros, S. & Räsänen, O. (2016). Perception of sentence stress in speech correlates with the temporal unpredictability of prosodic features. Cognitive Science, 40(7), 1739–74.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Broersma, M. & Cho, T. (2012). The use of prosodic cues in learning new words in an unfamiliar language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 415–44.Google Scholar
Krivokapić, J., Tiede, M. K. & Tyrone, M. E. (2017). A kinematic study of prosodic structure in articulatory and manual gestures: Results from a novel method of data collection. Laboratory Phonology, 8(1), 3.Google Scholar
Kügler, F. & Calhoun, S. (2020). Prosodic encoding of information structure: a typological perspective. In Gussenhoven, C. & Chen, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language Prosody. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 454–467.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational Phonology, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. & Pierrehumbert, J. (1984). Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In Aronoff, M. & Oerhle, R., eds., Language Sound Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 157–233.Google Scholar
Mattys, S., White, L. & Melhorn, J. (2005). Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 477–500.Google Scholar
Mo, Y. (2010). Prosody Production and Perception with Conversational Speech. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/18560.Google Scholar
Möhler, G. & Conkie, A. (1998). Parametric modeling of intonation using vector quantization. In Proceedings of the 3rd ESCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis, pp. 311–16.Google Scholar
Nenkova, A., Brenier, J., Kothari, A., Calhoun, S., Whitton, L., Beaver, D. & Jurafsky, D. (2007). To memorize or to predict: Prominence labelling in conversational speech. In Human Language Technologies: NAACL, Rochester, NY, pp. 9–16.Google Scholar
O’Connor, J. D. & Arnold, G. F. (1961). The Intonation of Colloquial English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1983). Cross-language use of pitch: An ethological view. Phonetica, 40, 1‒18.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1984). An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of f0 in voice. Phonetica, 41, 1‒16.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1994). The frequency code underlies the sound symbolic use of voice of pitch. In Hinton, L., Nichols, J. & Ohala, J. J., eds., Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 325–47.Google Scholar
Peng, S.-H., Chan, M. K. M., Tseng, C.-Y., Huang, T., Lee, O. J. & Beckman, M. E. (2005). Towards a Pan-Mandarin system for prosodic transcription. In Jun, S.-A., ed., Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD thesis, MIT, published by Indiana Linguistics Club, 1987.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (2000). Tonal elements and their alignment. In Horne, M., ed., Prosody: Theory and Experiment. Studies Presented to Gösta Bruce. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 11‒36.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (2016). Phonological representation: Beyond abstract versus episodic. Annual Review of Linguistics, 2(1), 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Cohen, P. R., Morgan, J. & Pollack, M. E., eds., Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 271‒311.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1945). The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Prieto, P. (2015). Intonational meaning. WIREs Cognitive Science, 6(4), 371–81.Google Scholar
Prieto, P., D’Imperio, M. & Gili Fivela, B. (2005). Pitch accent alignment in Romance: Primary and secondary associations with metrical structure. Language and Speech, 48, 359–96.Google Scholar
Queen, R. M. (2001). Bilingual intonation patterns: Evidence of language change from Turkish–German bilingual children. Language in Society, 30(1), 55–80.Google Scholar
Reichel, U. D. & Salveste, N. (2015). Pitch elbow detection. In Wirsching, G., ed., Elektronische Sprachverarbeitung. Studientexte zur Sprachkommunikation, 78, Dresden: TUDpress, pp. 143–9.Google Scholar
Rogerson-Revell, P. (2011). English Phonology and Pronunciation Teaching. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Roy, J., Cole, J. & Mahrt, T. (2017). Individual differences and patterns of convergence in prosody perception. Laboratory Phonology, 8(1), 22.Google Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, V. (2005). Prosody–syntax interaction in the expression of focus. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23, 687–755.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, K., Walsh, M., Calhoun, S., Schütze, H., Möbius, B., Schweitzer, A. & Dogil, G. (2015). Exploring the relationship between intonation and the lexicon: Evidence for lexicalised storage of intonation. Speech Communication, 66, 65–81.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (2011). The syntax–phonology interface. In Goldsmith, J., Riggle, J. & Yu, A., eds., The Handbook of Phonological Theory. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 2nd ed., pp. 435–84.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. & Turk, A. E. (1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(2), 193–247.Google Scholar
Silverman, K., Beckman, M., Pitrelli, J., Ostendorf, M., Wightman, C., Price, P. et al. (1992). ToBI: A standard for labeling English prosody. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Banff, Canada, pp. 867‒70.Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A. & Lin, P. M. S. (2017). Production of ambiguous idioms in English: A reading aloud study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1) 58–70.Google Scholar
Skopeteas, S., Fielder, I., Hellmuth, S., Schwarz, A., Fanselow, G., Féry, C. & Krifka, M. (2006). Questionnaire on Information Structure (QUIS): Reference Manual, Potsdam, Germany: University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Speer, S. R., Warren, P. & Schafer, A. J. (2011). Situationally independent prosodic phrasing. Laboratory Phonology, 2(1), 39‒98.Google Scholar
Steedman, M. (2000). Information structure and the syntax–phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(4), 649–89.Google Scholar
Syrdal, A. K., Hirschberg, J., McGory, J. & Beckman, M. (2001). Automatic ToBI prediction and alignment to speed manual labeling of prosody. Speech Communication, 33, 135–51.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. (2000). Analysis and synthesis of intonation using the Tilt model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1697–714.Google Scholar
Trager, G. & Smith, H. (1951). An Outline of English Structure. Washington: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Turk, A. (2011). The temporal implementation of prosodic structure. In Cohn, A., Fougeron, C. & Huffman, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 242–53.Google Scholar
Vroomen, J., Tuomainen, J. & de Gelder, B. (1998). The roles of word stress and vowel harmony in speech segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(2), 133–49.Google Scholar
Wagner, M. (2015). Phonological evidence in syntax. In Kiss, T. & Alexidou, A., eds., Syntax – Theory and Analysis: An International Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter, Vol. 2, pp. 1154–98.Google Scholar
Wagner, M. & Watson, D. G. (2010). Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7–9), 905–45.Google Scholar
Wakefield, J. C. (2010). The English Equivalents of Cantonese Sentence-Final Particles: A Contrastive Analysis. PhD thesis, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Wakefield, J. C. (2012). A floating tone discourse morpheme: The English equivalent of Cantonese ‘lo1’. Lingua, 122(14), 1739–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, G. & Hirschberg, J. (1985). Implicating uncertainty: The pragmatics of fall-rise intonation. Language, 61, 747–76.Google Scholar
Warren, P. (2005a). Issues in the study of intonation in language varieties. Language and Speech, 48(4), 345‒58.Google Scholar
Warren, P. (2005b). Patterns of late rising in New Zealand English: Intonational variation or intonational change? Language Variation and Change, 17(2), 209‒30.Google Scholar
Warren, P. (2016). Uptalk: The Phenomenon of Rising Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, P. (2017). The interpretation of prosodic variability in the context of accompanying sociophonetic cues. Laboratory Phonology, 8(1), 11.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (2006). English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (1999). Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0 contours. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 55–105.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (2005). Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions. Speech Communication, 46, 220–51.Google Scholar

9.7 References

Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Abercrombie, D., Fry, D. B., McCarthy, P. A. D., Scott, N. C. & Trim, J. L. M., eds. (1964). In Honour of Daniel Jones: Papers Contributed on the Occasion of his Eightieth Birthday 12 September 1961. London: Longmans, Green & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J., Esling, J. H. & Dickson, B. C. (1995). The VoQS system for the transcription of voice quality. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 25, 71–80.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J., Esling, J. H. & Dickson, B. C. (2000). The transcription of voice quality. In Kent & Ball, pp. 49–58.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J., Esling, J. H. & Dickson, B. C. (2018). Revisions to the VoQS system for the transcription of voice quality. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 28, 165–71. doi:10.1017/S0025100317000159.Google Scholar
Benner, A. (2009). Production and Perception of Laryngeal Constriction in the Early Vocalizations of Bai and English Infants. Doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Benítez, A., Ramanarayanan, V., Goldstein, L. & Narayanan, S. S. (2014). A real-time MRI study of articulatory setting in second language speech. In Fifteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Singapore, pp. 701–5.Google Scholar
Bruyninckx, M., Harmegnies, B., Llisterri, J. & Poch, D. (1994). Language-induced voice quality variability in bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 22, 19–31.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1964). Phonation types: The classification of some laryngeal components of speech production. In Abercrombie et al., pp. 26–37.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1977). Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1983). Pharyngeal and laryngeal sounds in Caucasian languages. In Bless, D. M. & Abbs, J. H., eds., Vocal Fold Physiology: Contemporary Research and Clinical Issues. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press, pp. 344–50.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (2001). A Practical Introduction to Phonetics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (2002). On Rs, rhotacism and paleophony. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31, 171–85.Google Scholar
Coey, C., Esling, J. H. & Moisik, S. R. (2014). iPA Phonetics [app for iPhone]. Version 1.0, Department of Linguistics, University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Denning, K. (1989).The Diachronic Development of Phonological Voice Quality, with Special Reference to Dinka and the Other Nilotic Languages. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Edmondson, J. A. & Esling, J. H. (2006). The valves of the throat and their functioning in tone, vocal register, and stress: Laryngoscopic case studies. Phonology, 23, 157–91.Google Scholar
Esling, J. H. (1987). Methodology for voice setting awareness in language classes. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée, 85, 449–73.Google Scholar
Esling, J. H. (1996). Pharyngeal consonants and the aryepiglottic sphincter. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 26, 65–88.Google Scholar
Esling, J. H. (1999). The IPA categories ‘pharyngeal’ and ‘epiglottal’: Laryngoscopic observations of pharyngeal articulations and larynx height. Language & Speech, 42, 349–72.Google Scholar
Esling, J. H. (2000). Crosslinguistic aspects of voice quality. In Kent & Ball, pp. 25–35.Google Scholar
Esling, J. H. (2005). There are no back vowels: The Laryngeal Articulator Model. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 50, 13–44.Google Scholar
Esling, J. H. (2010). Phonetic notation. In Hardcastle, W. J., Laver, J. & Gibbon, F. E., eds., The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 678–702.Google Scholar
Esling, J. H. & Harris, J. G. (2005). States of the glottis: An articulatory phonetic model based on laryngoscopic observations. In Hardcastle & Mackenzie Beck, pp. 347–83.Google Scholar
Esling, J. H. & Wong, R. F. (1983). Voice quality settings and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 89–95.Google Scholar
Esling, J. H., Harmegnies, B. & Delplancq, V. (1991). Social distribution of long-term average spectral characteristics in Vancouver English. Actes du XIIème Congrès International des Sciences Phonétiques, vol. 2. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence, pp. 182–5.Google Scholar
Esling, J. H., Moisik, S. R. & Coey, C. (2015). iPA Phonetics: Multimodal iOS application for phonetics instruction and practice. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (paper 263), Glasgow.Google Scholar
Esling, J. H., Moisik, S. R., Benner, A. & Crevier-Buchman, L. (2019). Voice Quality: The Laryngeal Articulator Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P. & French, P. (2012). Forensic speaker comparison: A linguistic–acoustic perspective. In Solan, L. M. & Tiersma, P. M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 557–72.Google Scholar
Gick, B., Wilson, I., Koch, K. & Cook, C. (2004). Language-specific articulatory settings: Evidence from inter-utterance rest position. Phonetica, 61, 220–33. doi.org/10.1159/000084159.Google Scholar
Gobl, C. & Ní Chasaide, A. (1992). Acoustic characteristics of voice quality. Speech Communication, 11, 481–90.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, W. J. & Mackenzie Beck, J., eds. (2005). A Figure of Speech: A Festschrift for John Laver. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Harmegnies, B., Esling, J. H. & Delplancq, V. (1989). Quantitative study of the effects of setting changes on the LTAS. In Tubach, J. P. & Mariani, J. J., eds., European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, vol. 2. Edinburgh: CEP Consultants, pp. 139–42.Google Scholar
Harmegnies, B., Delplancq, V., Esling, J. H. & Bruyninckx, M. (1994). Effets sur le signal vocal de changements délibérés de qualité globale en anglais et français. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée, 111, 139–53.Google Scholar
Hess, S. A. (1998). Pharyngeal Articulations. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Honikman, B. (1964). Articulatory settings. In Abercrombie et al., pp. 73–84.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38, 365–79.Google Scholar
Kent, R. D. & Ball, M. J., eds. (2000). Voice Quality Measurement. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Knowles, G. O. (1974). Scouse: The Urban Dialect of Liverpool. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1968). Voice quality and indexical information. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 3, 43–54.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1974). Labels for voices. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 4, 62–75.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1975). Individual Features in Voice Quality. Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1979). Voice Quality: A Classified Bibliography. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1980). The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1991). The Gift of Speech: Papers in the Analysis of Speech and Voice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Laver, J. & Mackenzie Beck, J. (2007). Vocal Profile Analysis Scheme – VPAS. Queen Margaret University College – QMUC, Speech Science Research Centre, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Laver, J. & Trudgill, P. (1979). Phonetic and linguistic markers in speech. In Scherer, K. R. & Giles, H., eds. Social Markers in Speech. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Lindau, M. (1979). The feature expanded. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 163–76.Google Scholar
Mackenzie Beck, J. (1988). Organic Variation and Voice Quality. Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Mackenzie Beck, J. (2005). Perceptual analysis of voice quality: The place of Vocal Profile Analysis. In Hardcastle & Mackenzie Beck, pp. 285–322.Google Scholar
Meluzzi, C., Celata, C., Moisik, S. R. & Esling, J. H. (2017). A lingual-laryngeal ultrasound view of aryepiglottic trills. Paper presented at Ultrafest VIII, Potsdam.Google Scholar
Mennen, I., Scobbie, J. M., de Leeuw, E., Schaeffler, S. & Schaeffler, F. (2010). Measuring language-specific phonetic settings. Second Language Research, 26, 13–41.Google Scholar
Moisik, S. R. (2013). The Epilarynx in Speech. Doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Moisik, S. R., Czaykowska-Higgins, E. & Esling, J. H. (2019). Phonological potentials and the lower vocal tract. Journal of the International Phonetic Association. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100318000403.Google Scholar
Moisik, S. R., Lin, H. & Esling, J. H. (2014). A study of laryngeal gestures in Mandarin citation tones using simultaneous laryngoscopy and laryngeal ultrasound (SLLUS). Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 44, 21–58.Google Scholar
Moisik, S. R., Esling, J. H., Crevier-Buchman, L. & Halimi, P. (2019). Putting the larynx in the vowel space: Studying larynx state across vowel quality using MRI. In International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2019, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. (1983). The Phonetic Bases of Speaker Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Podesva, R. J. (2007). Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11, 478–504.Google Scholar
Podesva, R. J. & Callier, P. (2015). Voice quality and identity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 173–94.Google Scholar
Ramanarayanan, V., Goldstein, L., Byrd, D. & Narayanan, S. S. (2011). An MRI study of articulatory settings of L1 and L2 speakers of American English. In Proc. Int. Seminar on Speech Production (ISSP), June 2011.Google Scholar
Ramanarayanan, V., Goldstein, L., Byrd, D. & Narayanan, S. S. (2013). An investigation of articulatory setting using real-time magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134, 510.Google Scholar
San Segundo, E., Foulkes, P., French, P., Harrison, P., Hughes, V. & Kavanagh, C. (2018). The use of the Vocal Profile Analysis for speaker characterization: Methodological proposals. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 49(3), 353–80.Google Scholar
Schaeffler, S., Scobbie, J. M. & Mennen, I. (2008). An evaluation of interspeech postures for the study of language-specific articulatory settings. Paper presented at the 8th International Seminar on Speech Production, Strasbourg, France.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (2003). Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication, 40, 227–56.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, J. (1999). Glasgow: Accent and voice quality. In Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G., eds., Urban Voices. London: Arnold, pp. 203–22.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. (1877). Handbook of Phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. (1890). A Primer of Phonetics (3rd ed., revised, 1906). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Święciński, R. (2013). An EMA study of articulatory settings in Polish speakers of English. In Waniek-Klimczak, E. & Shockey, L. R., eds., Teaching and Researching English Accents in Native and Non-Native Speakers. Berlin: Springer, pp. 73–82.Google Scholar
Teshigawara, M. & Murano, E. Z. (2004). Articulatory correlates of voice qualities of good guys and bad guys in Japanese anime: An MRI study. In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2004 – ICSLP, Jeju, Korea.Google Scholar
Toutios, A., Lingala, S. G., Vaz, C., Kim, J., Esling, J., Keating, P. et al. (2016). Illustrating the production of the International Phonetic Alphabet sounds using fast real-time magnetic resonance imaging. Paper presented at INTERSPEECH, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974). The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English (3 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, I. (2006). Articulatory Settings of French and English Monolingual and Bilingual Speakers. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Wilson, I. & Gick, B. (2006). Ultrasound technology and second language acquisition research. In Grantham O’Brien, M., Shea, C. & Archibald, J., eds., Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2006). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 148–52.Google Scholar
Wilson, I. & Gick, B. (2014). Bilinguals use language-specific articulatory settings. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 361–73.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×