Typology of Grammatical Categories

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999. The Arawak language family. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), The Amazonian Languages, pp. 65–106. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2007. Typological distinction in word formation. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, pp. 1–65. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Akinlabi, Akinbiyi. 2011. Featural affixes. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth and Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, pp. 1945–71. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 1990. Sapir’s approach to typology and current issues in morphology. In Dressler, Wolfgang U., Lushützky, Hans C., Pfeiffer, Oskar E. and Remison, John R. (eds.), Contemporary morphology, pp. 277–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 2003. Introducing linguistic morphology, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie and Valera, Salvador. 2005. Approaches to conversion/Zero derivation. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar

Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme based morphology: A general theory of inflection and word formation. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Beck, David. 2011. Lexical, quasi-inflectional, and inflectional compounding in Upper Necaxa Totonac. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Muysken, Pieter (eds.), Multi-verb constructions: A view from the Americas, pp. 63–106. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Beck, David and Mel’čuk, Igor A.. 2011. Morphological phrasemes and Totonacan verbal morphology. Linguistics 49: 175–228.Google Scholar

Bendor-Samuel, John. 1961. An outline of the grammatical and phonological structure of Terêna, Parts 1 and 2. Brasilia: Summer Institute of Lingusitics.Google Scholar

Bergenholtz, Henning and Mugdan, Joachim. 1979. Einführung in die Morphologie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

Berman, Ruth and Seroussi, Batia. 2011. Derived nouns in Modern Hebrew: Structural and psycholinguistic perspectives. Rivista di Linguistica 23: 105–25.Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar and Nichols, Johanna. 2007. Inflectional morphology. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, pp. 169–240. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Biggs, Bruce G. 1959. Rotuman vowels and their history. Te Reo Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand 2: 24–6.Google Scholar

Buckley, Eugene. 2003. Emergent vowels in Tigrinya templates. In Lecarme, Jacqueline (ed.), Research in Afroasiatic grammar II: Selected papers from the Fifth Conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Paris, 2000, pp. 105–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cantineau, Jean. 1950a. Racines et schèmes. In Marçais, William (ed.), Mélanges offerts à William Marçais, pp. 119–24. Paris: G.-P. Maisonneuve.Google Scholar

Cantineau, Jean. 1950b. La notion de schème et son altération dans diverses langues sémitiques. Semitica 3: 73–83.Google Scholar

Childs, G. Tucker. 1995. A grammar of Kisi, a Southern Atlantic language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Clark, Eve V. and Clark, Herbert H.. 1979. When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55: 767–811.Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2007. Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language 83: 9–42.Google Scholar

Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa and Kinkade, M. Dale. 1998. Salish languages and linguistics. In Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa and Kinkade, M. Dale (eds.), Salish languages and linguistics: Theoretical and descriptive perspectives, pp. 1–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1996. The bipartite stem belt: Disentangling areal and genetic correspondences. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special session on historical issues in Native American languages, pp. 37–54. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1999. Lexical prefixes and the bipartite stem construction in Klamath. International Journal of American Linguistics 65: 56–83.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2014. Making new words: Morphological derivation in English. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.. 2002. Word: A typological framework. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 1–41. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1985. Suppletion in word-formation. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Historical semantics, historical word formation, pp. 97–112. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1987. Word formation as a part of natural morphology. In Dressler, Wolfgang U., Mayerthaler, Willi, Panagl, Oswald and Wurzel, Wolfgang U. (eds.), Leitmotifs in natural morphology, pp. 99–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Prefixing vs. suffixing in inflectional morphology. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at: http://wals.info/chapter/26 [Accessed 01.07.2014].Google Scholar

Eastlack, Charles L. 1968. Terêna (Arawakan) pronouns. International Journal of American Linguistics 34: 1–8.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas. 2003. Bininj Gun-wok: A pan dialectal grammar of Mayali, Kunwinjku, and Kune, Vol. I. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Foris, David Paul. 2000. A grammar of Sochiapan Chinantec. (Studies in Chinantec Languages, 6). Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar

Gerdts, Donna B. 2003. The morphosyntax of Halkomelem lexical suffixes. International Journal of American Linguistics 69: 345–561.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gómez, Gale Goodwin and van der Voort, Hein (eds.). 2014. Reduplication in indigenous languages of South America. (Brill Studies in the Indigenous Languages of the Americas 7). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Guirardello-Damian, Raquel. 2014. Reduplication and Ideophones in Trumai. In Gómez, and van der Voort, (eds.), pp. 217–46.Google Scholar

Hagège, Claude. 1986. La langue palau, une curiosité typologique. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 2011. Cambodian: Khmer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hardy, Heather K. and Montler, Timothy R.. 1988. Alabama radical morphology: H-infix and disfixation. In Shipley, William (ed.), In honor of Mary Haas: From the Haas Festival Conference on Native American Linguistics, pp. 377–409. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin and Sims, Andrea D.. 2010. Understanding morphology, 2nd edn. London: Hodder.Google Scholar

Hess, Thom. 1998. Lushootseed reader with intermediate grammar, Vol. II: Four stories from Martha Lamont. Tulalip Tribes.Google Scholar

Holton, Gary. 2000. The phonology and morphology of the Tanacross Athapaskan language. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar

Hurch, Bernhardt (ed.). 2005. Studies on reduplication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hurch, Bernhard and Mattes, Veronika. 2009. Typology of reduplication: The Graz database. In Everaert, Martin, Musgrave, Simon and Dimitriadis, Alexis (eds.), Use of databases in cross-linguistic studies, pp. 301–28. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Jacobson, William H. Jr. 1980. Washo bipartite stems. In Klar, Kathryn, Langdon, Margaret and Silver, Shirley (eds.), American Indian and Indo-European studies: Papers in honor of Madison S. Beeler, pp. 85–99. Mouton: Hague.Google Scholar

Kanu, Sullay Mohamed. 2012. Valency-increasing morphology in Temne. PhD dissertation, University of Alberta.Google Scholar

Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1997. Ierarxii, roli, nuli, markirovannost’ i ‘anomal’naja’ upakovka gram matičeskoj semantiki [Hierarchies, roles, zeroes, markedness and ‘anomalous’ wrapping of grammatical semantics]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 4: 27–57.Google Scholar

Kroeber, Alfred L. 1911. Incorporation as a linguistic process. American Anthropologist 13: 577–84.Google Scholar

Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1958. Esquisse d’une théorie de l’apophonie en sémitique. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 53: 1–38.Google Scholar

Leslau, Wolf. 1941. Documents tigrigna (éthiopien septenetrional): Grammaire et textes. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 1987. An integrated theory of autosegmental processes. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Lupardus, Karen Jacque. 1982. The language of the Alabama Indians. PhD dissertation, University of Kansas.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Monica. 1996. A grammar of Chalcatongo Mixtec. (University of California Publications in Linguistics, Vol. 127). San Francisco: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Majewicz, Alfred and Pogonowski, Jerzy. 1984. On categorial marking in natural languages. Lingua Posnaniensus 26: 56–68.Google Scholar

Matthews, Peter H. 1974. Inflectional morphology: A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 6). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, Peter H. 1978. Morphology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, Stephen and Yip, Virginia. 1994. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

McCarthy, John. 1981. A prosodic theory of non-concatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 373–418.Google Scholar

Mchombo, Sam. 2004. The syntax of Chichewa. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McQuown, Norman A. 1990. Gramática de la lengua totonaca (Coatepec, Sierra Norte de Puebla). Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar

Mel’čuk, Igor A. 1963. O ‘vnutrennei fleksii’ v indoevropeiskikh i semitskikh yazykakh [On ‘internal inflection’ in Indo-European and Semitic languages]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Problems in linguistics] 4: 27–40.Google Scholar

Mel’čuk, Igor A. 1982. Towards a language of Linguistics. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar

Mel’čuk, Igor A. 1993–2000. Cours de morphologie générale, Vol. I–V. Paris: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.Google Scholar

Mel’čuk, Igor A. 1994. Suppletion: Towards a logical analysis of the concept. Studies in Language 18: 399–410.Google Scholar

Mel’čuk, Igor A. 2000. Morphological Processes. In Booij, Geert E., Lehmann, Christian, Mugdan, Joachim and Skopeteas, Stavros (eds.), Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation, pp. 523–35. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Mel’čuk, Igor A. 2006. Aspects of the theory of morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60: 847–94.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1994. Word-formation: Incorporation. In Asher, Ronald E. and Simpson, J. M. Y. (eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Vol. IX, pp. 5024–6. Oxford: Pergamom Press.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 2003. Why prefixes? Acta Linguistica Hungarica 50: 155–85.Google Scholar

Moravscik, Edith. 1978. Reduplicative constructions. In Greenberg, Joseph (ed.), Universals of human language: Vol. III: Word structure, pp. 297–334. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Nater, Hank F. 2006. A concise Nuxalk-English dictionary. (Canadian Ethnology Service Mercury Series Paper 115). Hull, QC: National Museum of Civilization.Google Scholar

Newmark, Leonard, Hubbard, Philip and Prifti, Peter. 1982. Standard Albanian: A reference grammar for students. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Nida, Eugene. 1961. Morphology: The descriptive analysis of words. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Okrand, Marc. 1979. Metathesis in Costanoan grammar. International Journal of American Linguistics 45: 123–30.Google Scholar

Panov, Mixail V. 1959. O grammaticheskoi forme [On grammatical forms]. In Vasilenko, I. A. (ed.), Uchenye zapiski moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo instituta im. V. P. Potemkina [Scientific papers of the Moscow Municipal Pedagogical Institute V. P. Potemkin] 73(6): 5–39.Google Scholar

de Reuse, Willem J. 1994. Noun incorporation. In Asher, Ronald E. and Simpson, J. M. Y. (eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Vol. IX, pp. 2842–7. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

de Reuse, Willem J. 2009. Polysynthesis as a typological feature: An attempt at a characterization from Eskimo and Athabascan perspectives. In Mahieu, Marc-Antoine and Tersis, Nicole (eds.), Variations on polysynthesis: The Eskaleut languages, pp. 19–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Rose, Françoise. 2014. When vowel deletion blurs reduplication in Mojeño Trinitario. In Gómez, Gale Goodwin and van der Voort, Hein (eds.), Reduplication in Indigenous languages of South America, pp. 375–99. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Rubino, Carl. 2005. Reduplication: Form, function, and distribution. In Hurch, Bernhard (ed.), Studies on reduplication, pp. 11–29. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Rubino, Carl. 2006. Intensive Tausug: A pedagogical grammar of the language of Jolo, Phillipines. Springfield, VA: Dunwoody Press.Google Scholar

Rupp, James E. 1989. Lealao Chinantec Syntax. (Studies in Chinantec Languages, 2). Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Sadock, Jerrold M. 1980. Noun incorporation in Greenlandic: A case of syntactic word formation. Language 56: 300–19.Google Scholar

Saeed, John I. 1999. Somali. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1911. The problem of noun incorporation in American languages. American Anthropologist 13: 250–82.Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. [1921] 2004. Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1960. Course in general linguistics, trans. Baskin, Wade. London: Peter Owen.Google Scholar

Shimron, Joseph (ed.). 2003. Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sneddon, James Neil. 1996. Indonesian: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Štekauer, Pavel. 1996. A theory of conversion in English. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Thompson, Laurence C. and Kinkade, M. Dale. 1990. Languages. In Suttles, Wayne (ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. VII: Northwest coast, pp. 30–51. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar

Thompson, Laurence C. and Thompson, M. Terry. 1969. Metathesis as a grammatical device. International Journal of American Linguistics 35: 213–19.Google Scholar

Tucker, A. N. 1994. A grammar of Kenya Luo (Dholuo). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar

Tucker, A. N. and Mpaayei, J. Tompo Ole. 1955. A Maasai grammar with vocabulary. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar

Tyron, D. T. 1986. Stem-initial consonant alternation in the languages of Epi, Vanuatu: A case of assimilation? In Geraghty, Paul, Carrington, Lois and Wurm, Stephen A. (eds.), Focal II: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, pp. 239–58. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

van Eijk, Jan. 2004. Locus and ordering in Lillooet morphology. In Gerdts, Donna B. and Matthewson, Lisa (eds.), Studies in Salish linguistics in honor of M. Dale Kinkade, pp. 454–67. Missoula: University of Montana Occasional Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar

Velupillai, Viveka. 2012. An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef Google Scholar

Veselinova, Ljuba N. 2006. Suppletion in verb paradigms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Watahomigie, Lucille J., Bender, Jorigine, Watahomigie, Philbert Sr. and Yamamoto, Akira Y.. 2001. Hualapai reference grammar. (Endangered Languages of the Pacific Rim A2–003). Kyoto: Nakanishi.Google Scholar

Watanabe, Honoré. 2003. A morphological description of Sliammon, Mainland Comox Salish with a sketch of syntax. (Endangered Languages of the Pacific Rim A2–040). Kyoto: Nakanishi.Google Scholar

Zepeda, Ofelia. 1983. A Papago grammar. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar

Adams, K. L. 1989. Systems of numeral classification in the Mon-Khmer, Nicobarese and Aslian subfamilies of Austroasiatic. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Adams, K. L. 1992. A comparison of the numeral classification of humans in Mon-Khmer. Mon Khmer Studies 21: 107–29.Google Scholar

Ahland, Colleen Anne. 2012. A grammar of northern and southern Gumuz. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorisation devices. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004a. Gender. In Booij, Geert E., Lehmann, Christian, Mugdan, Joachim and Skopetas, Stavros (eds.), Morfology: A handbook on inflection and word formation [Morfologie: Ein Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung], Article 98, pp. 1031–45, 2 Halbband. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004b. Nominal classification: Towards a comprehensive typology. Nominal classification. Special issue of Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (ed. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.) 57(2/3): 105–16.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2006. Classifiers and noun classes: Semantics. In Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edn, Vol. I, Article 1111, pp. 463–70. Elsevier: Oxford.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2007. Classifiers in multiple environments: Baniwa of Içana/Kurripako: A North Arawak perspective. International Journal of American Linguistics 27: 475–500.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2010. Gender, noun class and language obsolescence: The case of Paumarí. In Carlin, E. B. and van de Kerke, Simon (eds.), Linguistics and archeology in the Americas, pp. 236–52. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012a. Languages of the Amazon. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012b. Round women and long men: Shape and size in gender choice in Papua New Guinea and beyond. Anthropological Linguistics 54(1): 33–86.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012c. Possession and ownership in a typological perspective. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 1–64. Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2015. Oxford bibliography online: Classifiers (refereed updateable resource with summaries and evaluation for each entry), ed. (general) Aronoff, Mark. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W.. 2011. Dependencies between grammatical systems. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Language at large: Essays on syntax and semantics, pp. 170–204. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Green, Diana. 2011. Palikur and the typology of classifiers. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Language at large: Essays in syntax and semantics, pp. 394–450. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Becker, A. J. 1975. A linguistic image of nature: The Burmese numerative classifier system. Linguistics 165: 109–21.Google Scholar

Beckwith, C. I. 1998. Noun specification and classification in Uzbek. Anthropological Linguistics 40: 124–40.Google Scholar

Bender, Andrea and Beller, Sieghard. 2006. Numeral classifiers and counting systems in Polynesian and Micronesian languages: Common roots and cultural adaptations. Oceanic Linguistics 45: 380–403.Google Scholar

Benton, R. A. 1968. Numeral and attributive classifiers in Truquese. Oceanic Linguistics 7: 104–46.Google Scholar

Berlin, B. 1968. Tzeltal numeral classifiers: A study in ethnographic semantics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Bhaskararao, P. and Joshi, S. K.. 1985. A study of Newari classifiers. Bulletin of the Deccan College Research Institute 44: 17–31.Google Scholar

Bisang, W. 1993. Classifiers, quantifiers and class nouns in Hmong. Studies in Language 17: 1–51.Google Scholar

Bisang, W. 2002. Classification and the evolution of grammatical structures: A universal perspective. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 55: 289–308.Google Scholar

Blankenship, B. 1997. Classificatory verbs in Cherokee. Anthropological Linguistics 39: 92–110.Google Scholar

Boas, F. and Deloria, E.. 1941. Dakota grammar. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Bolaños, Katarina. Forthcoming. A grammar of Kakua. PhD thesis, MPI Leipzig.Google Scholar

Borneto, Carlo Serra. 1996. Liegen and stehen in German: A study in horizontality and verticality. In Casad, E. (ed.), Cognitive linguistics in the Redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics, pp. 459–506. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bradley, David. 2001. Counting the family: Family group classifiers in Yi (Tibeto-Burman) languages. Anthropological Linguistics 43: 1–17.Google Scholar

Braun, Friederike and Haig, Geoffrey. 2010. Where are German ‘girls’ feminine? How the semantics of age influences the grammar of gender agreement. In Bieswanger, Markus, Motschenbacker, Heiko and Mühleisen, Susanne (eds.), Language in its socio-cultural context: New explorations in gendered, global and media uses, pp. 68–84. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Brown, R. 1981. Semantic aspects of some Waris predications. In Franklin, K. J. (ed.), Syntax and semantics in Papua New Guinea languages, pp. 93–123. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Bugaeva, T. G. 1979. Numerativy v korejskom jazyke [Numeratives in Korean]. Issledovanija v oblasti etimologii altajskikh yazykov, pp. 206–55. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar

Carpenter, K. 1987. How children learn to classify nouns in Thai. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Carter, R. M. 1976. Chipewyan classificatory verbs. International Journal of American Linguistics 42(1): 24–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Céria, V. G. and Sândalo, F.. 1995. A preliminary reconstruction of Proto-Waikurúan with special reference to pronominals and demonstratives. Anthropological Linguistics 37: 169–91.Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo and Krapova, Iliyana. 2007. A note on Bulgarian numeral classifiers. Pitar Moş – a Building with a view: Papers in honour of Alexandra Cornilescu, pp. 45–51. Bucharest: Editura Universității din București.Google Scholar

Claudi, U. 1985. Zur Entstehung von Genussystemen. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar

Cobbinah, Alexander. 2010. The Casamance as an area of intense language contact: The case of Baïnounk Gubaher. Journal of Language Contact 3: 175–201.CrossRef Google Scholar

Conathan, Lisa. 2004. Classifiers in Yurok, Wiyot, and Algonquin. Berkeley Linguistics Society 30: 22–33.Google Scholar

Conklin, N. F. 1981. The semantics and syntax in numeral classification in Tai and Austronesian. PhD thesis, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Contini-Morava, Ellen and Kilarski, Marcin. 2013. Functions of nominal classification. Language Sciences 40: 263–99.Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2014. Gender typology. In Corbett, Greville G. (ed.), The expression of gender, pp. 87–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Craig, C. G. 1986. Jacaltec noun classifiers. Lingua 70: 241–84.Google Scholar

Daguman, Josephine. 2014. A grammar of Northern Subanen. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Daley, Karen Ann. 1998. Vietnamese classifiers in narrative texts. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar

Davis, D. R. n.d. Noun class markers in Wantoat. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

De Leon, Maria de Lourdes Pasquel. 1987. Noun and numeral classifiers in Mixtec and Tzotzil: A referential view. PhD thesis, University of Sussex.Google Scholar

Denny, J. P. 1976. What are noun classifiers good for? Papers from the Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 12: 122–32.Google Scholar

Denny, J. P. 1979. Semantic analysis of selected Japanese numeral classifiers for units. Linguistics 17: 317–35.Google Scholar

Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1999. Carib. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), The Amazonian languages, pp. 23–64. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. 2000. Number marking and noun categorization in Nilo-Saharan languages. Anthropological Linguistics 42: 214–61.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1977. A grammar of Yidiny. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1982. Where have all the adjectives gone? And other essays in semantics and syntax. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1988. A grammar of Boumaa Fijian. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2002. Australian languages: Their nature and development. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2010. Basic linguistic theory, Vol. II. Grammatical topics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2015. Edible gender, mother-in-law language and other grammatical wonders. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dobrin, Lise M. 2012. Concreteness in grammar: The noun class systems of the Arapesh languages. (Stanford Studies in Morphology and the Lexicon). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Downing, Pamela A. 1986. The anaphoric use of classifiers in Japanese. In Craig, C. G. (ed.), Noun classes and categorisation: Proceedings of a symposium on Categorisation and Noun Classification, Eugene, Oregon, October 1983, pp. 345–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Downing, Pamela A. 1996. Numeral classifier systems: The case of Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Drapeau, Lynn and Renée, Lambert-Brétière. 2011. Verbal classifiers in Innu. Anthropological Linguistics 53: 293–322.Google Scholar

Emeneau, M. B. 1956. India as a linguistic area. Language 32: 3–16.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. 2004. Nominal classification in Lao: A sketch. Nominal classification. Special issue of Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (ed. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.) 57(2/3): 117–43.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. 2007. A grammar of Lao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

England, N. 1983. A grammar of Mam, a Mayan language. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Erman, Anna. 2005. Le formant -gā dans la langue dan-blo au cours de grammaticalisation. Mandenkan 41: 1–21.Google Scholar

Foley, W. A. 1991. The Yimas language of New Guinea. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Fortescue, Michael. 2006. The origins of the Wakashan classificatory verbs of location and handling. Anthropological Linguistics 48: 266–87.Google Scholar

Frank, P. 1990. Ika syntax. (Studies in the Languages of Colombia 1). Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar

Franklin, K. 1981. Existential and pro-verbs in Kewa. In Franklin, K. J. (ed.), Syntax and semantics in Papua New Guinea Languages, pp.151–72. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Gabas Júnior, Nilson. 1999. A grammar of Karo, Tupí (Brazil). PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar

Geraghty, Paul. 2000. Possession in the Fijian languages. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 53(3/4): 243–50.Google Scholar

Gerdts, Donna and Hinkson, Mercedes Q.. 2004. Salish numeral classifiers: A lexical means to a grammatical end. Nominal classification. Special issue of Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (ed. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.) 57(2/3): 247–79.Google Scholar

Gerner, Matthias. 2006. Noun classifiers in Kam and Chinese Kam-Tai languages: Their morphosyntax, semantics and history. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 34: 237–305.Google Scholar

Gil, David. 2013. Numeral classifiers. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/55 [Accessed on 02.12.14).Google Scholar

Goldwasser, Orly. 2006. A comparison between classifier languages and classifier script: The case of Ancient Egyptian. In Goldenberg, Gideon (ed.), A festschrift for Hans Jakob Polotsky, pp. 16–39. Jerusalem: Magnes Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. H. 1972. Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis type. Working Papers in Language Universals; 9: 1–39. Reprinted in Greenberg, J. H., On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, ed. Denning, Keith and Kemmer, Suzanne, pp. 166–93. Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. H. 1978. How does language acquire gender markers. In Greenberg, J. H., Ferguson, C. A. and Moravcsik, E. A. (eds.), Universals of human languages, Vol. III: Word structure, pp.241–70. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Grinevald, Colette. 2000. A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Senft, Gunter (ed.), Systems of nominal classification, pp. 50–92. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grinevald, Colette and Seifart, Frank. 2004. Noun classes in African and Amazonian languages: Towards a comparison. Linguistic Typology 8: 243–85.Google Scholar

Gruzdeva, Ekaterina. 2004. Classifiers in Nivkh. Nominal classification. Special issue of Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (ed. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.) 57(2/3): 300–29.Google Scholar

Haas, Mary R. 1942. The use of numeral classifier in Thai. Language 18: 201–5.Google Scholar

Harvey, M. 1987. The Warray language from Adelaide River. MA thesis, Australian National University.Google Scholar

Harvey, M. 1992. The Gaagudju people and their language. PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 1982. African noun class systems. In Seiler, H. and Lehmann, C. (eds.), Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen. Teil I: Bereich und Ordnung der Phänomene, pp. 189–216. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession: Cognitive sources, forces and grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2005. The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological characteristics. In Adelaar, Alexander and Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, pp. 111–81. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hori, Hirofumi. 2000. Classifiers in Skidegate Haida. In Miyaoka, Osahito and Endo, Fubito (eds.), Languages of the North Pacific Rim, Vol. VI, pp. 141–55. Faculty of Informatics, Osaka Gakuin University, Suita, Japan.Google Scholar

Hyslop, Catriona. 2001. The Lolovoli dialect of the North-east Ambae language, Vanuatu. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2007–8. Newar classifiers: A summary of the literature. Journal of Newar Studies, No. 6, NS 1128: 1–20.Google Scholar

Ikoro, S. M. 1994. Numeral classifiers in Kana. Journal of African Language and Linguistics 15: 7–28.Google Scholar

Ikoro, S. M. 1996. The Kana language. University of Leiden.Google Scholar

Ingram, Andrew. 2003. The morphosyntax of numeral classifiers in Anamuxra: details of a multiple classifier system. Anthropological Linguistics 45: 129–68.Google Scholar

Jaisser, A. 1987. Hmong classifiers. Linguistics of The Tibeto-Burman Area 10(2): 169–75.Google Scholar

Jarkey, Nerida. 2015. Serial verbs in White Hmong. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Jun, W. and Guoqiao, Z.. 1993. An outline grammar of Mulao. Canberra: National Thai Studies Centre, Australian National University.Google Scholar

Juntanamalaga, P. 1988. Social issues in Thai classifier usage. Language Sciences 10: 313–30.Google Scholar

Keating, Elizabeth. 1997. Honorific possession: Power and language in Pohnpei, Micronesia. Language in Society 26: 247–68.Google Scholar

Kilarski, Marcin. 2009. Cherokee classificatory verbs: Their place in the study of American Indian languages. Historiographia Linguistica 36: 39–73.Google Scholar

Kilarski, Marcin. 2013. Nominal classification: A history of its study from the classical period to the present. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Klamer, Marian. 2014. The history of numeral classifiers in Teiwa (Papuan). In Storch, Anne and Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. (eds.), Number-constructions and semantics: Case studies from Africa, Amazonia, India and Oceania, pp. 135–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Klein, H. E. M. 1979. Noun classifiers in Toba. In Mathiot, (ed.), pp. 85–95.Google Scholar

Koehn, S. 1994. The use of generic terms in Apalaí genitive constructions. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Etnolingüisticos 8: 39–48.Google Scholar

Kölver, U. 1982a. Klassifikatorkonstruktionen in Thai, Vietnamesisch und Chinesisch. In Seiler, and Lehmann, (eds.), pp. 160–85.Google Scholar

Kölver, U. 1982b. Interaktion von nominalen Kategorien am Beispiel der Entwicklung des modernen Bengali. In Seiler, and Lehmann, (eds.), pp. 244–51.Google Scholar

Krauss, M. 1968. Noun classification systems in Athabascan, Eyak, Tlingit and Haida Verbs. International Journal of American Linguistics 34(3): 194–203.Google Scholar

Krishnamurti, Bh. 2002. Dravidian languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lang, Adrienne. 1975. The semantics of classificatory verbs in Enga and other Papua New Guinea languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Lee, Yunseok. 2014. Classifiers in Korean. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Lehrer, Adrienne. 1986. English classifier constructions. Lingua 68: 109–48.Google Scholar

Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 2006. Numerals in Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics 45: 133–52.Google Scholar

Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1983. Relational Classifiers. Lingua 60: 147–76.Google Scholar

Löbel, E. 2000. Classifiers vs. genders and noun classes: A case study in Vietnamese. In Unterbeck, B. (ed.), Gender in grammar and cognition: Proceedings of the workshop on Gender, pp. 259–319. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Lu, Tian-Qiao. 2012. Classifiers in Kam-Tai languages: A cognitive and cultural perspective. Boca Raton: Universal Publishers.Google Scholar

Makeeva, N. V. 2012. Grammaticheskij stroj jazyka kla-dan v tipologicheskom kontekste rodstvennykh jazykov [The grammatical organization of Kla-Dan in the typological context of related languages]. PhD dissertation, Institute of Linguistics RAN, Moscow.Google Scholar

Malone, Terry. 2004. Classifiers in Chimila (Chibchan). Nominal classification. Special issue of Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (ed. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.) 57(2/3): 144–201.Google Scholar

Marnita, R. 1996. Classifiers in Minangkabau. MA thesis, Australian National UniversityGoogle Scholar

Martins, S. A. 1994. Análise da morfosintaxe da língua Dâw (Makú-Kamã) e sua classificação tipológica. MA thesis, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.Google Scholar

Mathiot, M. (ed.). 1979. Ethnology: Boas, Sapir and Whorf revisited. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Y. 1993. Japanese numeral classifiers: A study on semantic categories and lexical organisation. Linguistics 31: 667–713.Google Scholar

Matthews, Stephen. 2006. Cantonese grammar in areal perspective. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 220–36. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Merlan, F. 1994. A grammar of Wardaman: A language of the Northern Territory of Australia. (Mouton Grammar Library 11). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Merlan, F., Roberts, S. P. and Rumsey, A.. 1997. New Guinea ‘classificatory verbs’ and Australian noun classification: A typological comparison. In Harvey, M. and Reid, N. (eds.), Nominal classification in Aboriginal Australia, pp.63–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Michael, Lev D. 2008. Nanti evidential practice: Language, knowledge, and social action in an Amazonian society. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60: 847–94.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1986. The convergence of noun classification systems. In Craig, C. G. (ed.), Noun classes and categorisation: Proceedings of a symposium on Categorisation and Noun Classification, Eugene, Oregon, October 1983, pp. 379–98. (Typological Studies in Language 7. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of Native North America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nekitel, O. 1986. A sketch of nominal concord in Abu’ (an Arapesh language). In Papers in New Guinea Linguistics No. 24, pp. 177–205. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Newman, Paul. 2000. The Hausa language: An encyclopedic reference grammar. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Nguyen, D. H. 1957. Classifiers in Vietnamese. Word 13: 124–52.Google Scholar

Nomoto, Hiroki. 2013. Number in classifier languages. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar

Pacioni, P. 1997. Possessive constructions, classifiers and plurality in Cantonese and some other Chinese dialects. In Hayasi, T. and Bhaskararao, P. (eds.), A report of the Joint Research Project: Analysis and description of individual languages and linguistic typology, pp. 199–222. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar

Pan, Chia-jung. 2013. A grammar of Lha’alhua, an Austronesian language from Taiwan. PhD thesis, James Cook University.Google Scholar

Payne, Doris L. 2008. Do classifiers function as pronouns in Yagua? In Malvestitti, Marisa, Messineo, Cristina and Bein, Roberto (eds.), Estudios en lingüística y antropología. Homenaje a Ana Gerzenstein de colegas y discípulos por sus tres décadas de contribución a las investigaciones de las lenguas indígenas en la Argentina, pp. 181–9. Buenos Aires: Instituto de Lingüística, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, University of Buenos Aires.Google Scholar

Payne, Thomas E. and Payne, Doris L.. 2012. A typological grammar of Panare, a Cariban language of Venezuela. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Pe, H. 1965. A re-examination of Burmese classifiers. Lingua 15: 163–86.Google Scholar

Pensalfini, R. 2003. A grammar of Jingulu, an Aboriginal language of the Northern Territory. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Pet, W. J. A. 1987. Lokono Dian, the Arawak language of Suriname: a grammatical sketch of its grammatical structure and lexicon. PhD thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Peterson, David. 2008. Bangladesh Khumi verbal classifiers and Kuki-Chin ‘chiming’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area 31(1): 109–38.Google Scholar

Poser, William J. 2005. Noun classification in Carrier. Anthropological Linguistics 47: 143–68.Google Scholar

Quigley, Susan R. 2002. Awara grammar essentials. Ms. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Quint, Nicolas. Forthcoming. Le système des classes nominales en nyun de Djifanghor.Google Scholar

Rankin, Robert L. 2004. The history and development of Siouan positionals with special attention to polygrammaticalization in Dhegiha. Nominal classification. Special issue of Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (ed. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.) 57(2/3): 202–27.Google Scholar

Rehg, K. (with Sohl, D. C.) 1981. Ponapean reference grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Reid, N. 1997. Class and classifier in Ngan’gityemerri. In Harvey, M. and Reid, N. (eds.), Nominal classification in Aboriginal Australia, pp. 165–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Ribeiro, Eduardo Rivail. 2002. O marcador de posse alienável em Kariri. Um morfema Macto-Jê revisitado. LIAMES 2: 31–48.Google Scholar

Rice, K. 1989. A grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Robins, Robert H. 1958. The Yurok language: Grammar, texts, lexicon. (University of California Publications in Linguistics, 15). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Rodrigues, Aryon D. 1997. Nominal classification in Kariri. Opción 13: 65–79.Google Scholar

Rushforth, S. 1991. Uses of Bearlake and Mescalero (Athapaskan) classificatory verbs. International Journal of American Linguistics 57: 251–66.Google Scholar

Saul, J. E. and Wilson, N. F.. 1980. Nung grammar. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar

Schaub, W. 1985. Babungo. Croom Helm Descriptive Grammars. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Schembri, Adam. 2003. Rethinking ‘classifiers’ in signed languages. In Emmorey, Karen (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, pp. 3–34. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Schokkin, Dineke. 2014. A grammar of Paluai, the language of Baluan island, Manus Province. PhD thesis, James Cook University.Google Scholar

Seifart, Frank. 2004. Nominal classification in Miraña, a Witotoan language of Colombia. Nominal classification. Special issue of Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (ed. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.) 57(2/3): 228–46.Google Scholar

Seiler, W. 1985 Imonda, a Papuan language. Canberra: Australian National University, Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Seiler, W. 1986. Noun-classificatory verbal prefixes as reanalysed serial verbs. Lingua 68: 189–206.Google Scholar

Seiler, H. and Lehmann, C. (eds.). 1982. Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen. Teil I: Bereich und Ordnung der Phänomene. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Senft, Gunter. 1996. Classificatory particles in Kilivila. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smith-Stark, S. 1974. The plurality split. Papers from the Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 10: 657–71.Google Scholar

Sohn, Ho-min. 1994. Korean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Spitulnik, D. 1989. Levels of semantic restructuring in Bantu noun classification. In Newman, P. and Botne, R. D. (eds.), Current approaches to African linguistics, Vol. V, pp. 207–20. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Stebbins, Tonya N. 2005. Nominal classification in Mali. Anthropological Linguistics 47: 77–131.Google Scholar

Tang, Chih-Chen Jane. 2004. Two types of classifier languages: A typological study of classification markers in Paiwan noun phrases. Language and Linguistics 5: 377–407.Google Scholar

Teng, Stacey Fang-Ching. 2008. A reference grammar of Puyuma: An Austronesian language of Taiwan. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Thompson, C. 1993. The areal prefix hu- in Koyukon Athabaskan. International Journal of American Linguistics 59(3): 315–33.Google Scholar

Vidal, Alejandra. 1997. Noun classification in Pilagá (Guaykuruan). Journal of Amazonian Languages 1: 60–111.Google Scholar

Vittrant, Alice. 2002. Classifier systems and noun categorization devices in Burmese. Berkeley Linguistics Society 28: 129–48.Google Scholar

Vydrin, Valentin. 2014. Quantifiers in Dan-Gwεεtaa (South Mande). Ms.Google Scholar

Wajanarat, S. 1979. Classifiers in Mal Thin. Mon-Khmer Studies 8: 295–303.Google Scholar

Walsh, M. 1997. Nominal classification and generics in Murrihnpatha. In Harvey, M. and Reed, N. (eds.), Nominal classification in Aboriginal Australia, pp. 255–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Weber, David J. 2002. The structural status of Bora classifiers. Work Papers of the SIL, University of North Dakota, session 46.Google Scholar

Welmers, Wm. E. 1973. African language structures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Zaugg-Coretti, Silvia. 2005. Le syntagme nominal en toussian du nord (langue voltaïque du Burkina Faso). Lizensiatsarbeit der philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Zürich.Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. 2003. ‘Classificatory’ constructions in Indo-Pakistani sign language: Grammaticalization and lexicalization processes. In Emmorey, Karen (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign language, pp. 113–42. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Zhang, Sihong. 2013. A reference grammar of Ersu, a Tibeto-Burman language from China. PhD thesis, James Cook University.Google Scholar

Zhang, Sihong. 2014. Numeral classifiers in Ersu. Language and Linguistics 15: 883–915.Google Scholar

Zubin, D. and Köpcke, K. M.. 1986. Gender and folk taxonomy: The indexical relation between grammatical and lexical categorisation. In Craig, C. G. (ed.), Noun classes and categorisation, pp. 139–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Zubin, D. and Shimojo, M.. 1993. How ‘general’ are general classifiers? with special reference to ko and tsu in Japanese. In Guenter, J. S., Kaiser, B. A. and Zoll, C. C. (eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 490–502. Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2010. Imperatives and commands. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra and Dixon, R. M. W.. 1998. Dependencies between grammatical systems. Language 74: 56–80.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan. 2006. Why languages prefer prohibitives? Journal of Foreign Languages 1: 1–25.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan. 2009. The Jespersen cycles. In van Gelderen, Elly (ed.), Cyclical change, pp. 35–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan. 2010a. Vers une typologie du prohibitif. In Floriric, Franck and Lambert-Brétière, Renée (eds.), La négation et les énoncés non susceptibles d’être niés, pp. 155–72. Paris: CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan. 2010b. On the diachrony of negation. In Horn, Laurence R. (ed.), The expression of negation, pp. 73–109. (The Expression of Cognitive Categories 4). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan and Lejeune, Ludo. [2005] 2013. The prohibitive. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), World atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/71. First published by Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan and Van Alsenoy, Lauren. Forthcoming. More ado about nothing: On the typology of negative indefinites. In Turner, Ken P. and Horn, Laurence R. (eds.), An atlas of meaning. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan, Vossen, Frens and Devos, Maud. 2013. Le cycle de Jespersen à trois ou quatre negations. In François, Jacques, Larrivée, Pierre, Legallois, Dominique and Neveu, Franck (eds.), La linguistique de la contradiction, pp. 19–30. Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Bernini, Giuliano and Ramat, Paolo. 1992. La frase negativa nelle lingue d’Europa. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar

Bowden, John. 1997. Taba (Makian Dalam): Description of an Austronesian language from Eastern Indonesia. PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar

Bright, William. 1957. The Karok language. (University of California Publications in Linguistics 13). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Capell, Arthur and Hinch, H. E.. 1970. Maung grammar. (Janua Linguarum, Series Practica 98). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Chamoreau, Claudine. 2000. Grammaire du purépecha. (Lincom Studies in Native American Linguistics 34). Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Chelliah, Shobhana L. 1997. A grammar of Meithei. (Mouton Grammar Library 17). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Churchward, C. Maxwell. 1953. Tongan grammar. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cornyn, William. 1944. Outline of Burmese grammar. (Language Dissertation 38. Supplement to Language 20(4)). Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1991. The evolution of negation. Journal of Linguistics 27: 1–27.Google Scholar

Cyffer, Norbert, Ebermann, Erwin and Ziegelmeyer, Georg (eds.). 2009. Negation patterns in West African languages and beyond. (Typological Studies in Language 87). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 1979. Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17: 79–106.Google Scholar

de Haan, Ferdinand. 1997. The interaction of modality and negation: A typological study. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2012. Basic linguistic theory, Vol. III: Further grammatical topics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2014. Making new words: Morphological derivation in English. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1988. Universals of negative position. In Hammond, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith and Wirth, Jessica (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, pp. 93–124. (Typological Studies in Language 17). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68: 81–138.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. [2005] 2013a. Negative morphemes. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), World atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/112/. First published by Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. [2011] 2013b. Order of negative morpheme and verb. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), World atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/143. First published by Max Planck Digital Library, 2011.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. [2011] 2013c. Position of negative morpheme with respect to subject, object, and verb. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), World atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/144. First published by Max Planck Digital Library, 2011.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. [2005] 2013d. Prefixing vs. suffixing in inflectional morphology. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), World atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/26. First published Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Kiss, Katalin. 2015. Negation in Hungarian. In Miestamo, Matti, Tamm, Anne and Wagner-Nagy, Beáta (eds.), Negation in Uralic languages, pp. 219–237. (Typological Studies in Language 108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Erelt, Mati. 2003. Syntax. In Erelt, Mati (ed.), Estonian language, pp. 93–129. Tallinn: Estonian Academy Publishers.Google Scholar

Eriksen, Pål Kristian. 2011. ‘To not be’ or not ‘to not be’: The typology of negation of non-verbal predicates. Studies in Language 35(2): 275–310.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas D. 1995. A grammar of Kayardild, with historical-comparative notes on Tangkic. (Mouton Grammar Library 15). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Forest, Robert. 1993. Négations: essai de syntaxe et de typologie linguistique. (Collection Linguistique LXXVII). Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1978. Negation in language: Pragmatics, function, ontology. In Cole, Peter (ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. IX. Pragmatics, pp. 69–112. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax: An introduction, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hardman, M. J. 2000 Jaqaru. (Languages of the World/Materials 183). Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian. (Mouton Grammar Library 9). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. [2005] 2013. Negative indefinite pronouns and predicate negation. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), World atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/115. First published Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Hinds, John. 1988. Japanese. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders. 2015. The syntax of yes and no. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Honda, Isao. 1996. Negation: A cross-linguistic study. Buffalo, NY: SUNY PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. [1989] 2001. A natural history of negation. (The David Hume Series, Philosophy and Cognitive Science Reissues). Stanford: CSLI Publications. First published by University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Hovdhaugen, Even and Mosel, Ulrike (ed.). 1999. Negation in Oceanic languages. (Lincom Studies in Austronesian Linguistics 2). Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Iwasaki, Shoichi and Ingkaphirom, Preeya. 2005. A reference grammar of Thai. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Janda, Laura A. and Townsend, Charles E.. 2000. Czech. (Languages of the World/Materials 125). Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and other languages. (Konelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser I,5). Copenhagen: Høst.Google Scholar

Kahrel, Peter. 1996. Aspects of negation. University of Amsterdam PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Kahrel, Peter and van den Berg, René (eds.). 1994. Typological studies in negation. (Typological Studies in Language 29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kämpfe, Hans-Rainer and Volodin, Aleander P.. 1995. Abriß der tschuktschischen Grammatik auf der Basis der Schriftsprache. (Tunguso-Sibirica 1). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Kimball, Geoffrey D. 1991. Koasati grammar. (Studies in the Anthropology of North American Indians). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Koehn, Edward and Koehn, Sally. 1986. Apalaí. In Derbyshire, Desmond C. and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. I, pp. 33–127. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria and Miestamo, Matti. 2015. Antonyms and word-level negation. Paper given at the conference Diversity Linguistics: Retrospect and Prospect, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, 2 May 2015.Google Scholar

Michael, Lev and Granadillo, Tania (eds.). 2014. Negation in Arawak languages. (Brill’s Studies in the Indigenous Languages of the Americas 6). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti. 2000. Towards a typology of standard negation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 23(1): 65–88.Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti. 2003. Clausal negation: A typological study. PhD Dissertation, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti. 2005. Standard negation: The negation of declarative verbal main clauses in a typological perspective. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 31). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti. 2009. Negative interrogatives. Paper given at the Eighth Biennial Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology (ALT 8), University of California at Berkeley, 26 July 2009.Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti. 2010. Negatives without negators. In Wohlgemuth, Jan and Cysouw, Michael (eds.), Rethinking universals: How rarities affect linguistic theory, pp. 169–94. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 45). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti. [2005] 2013a. Symmetric and asymmetric standard negation. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), World atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/113. First published Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti. [2005] 2013b. Subtypes of asymmetric standard negation. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), World atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/114. First published Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti. 2014. Partitives and negation: A cross-linguistic survey. In Luraghi, Silvia and Huumo, Tuomas (eds.), Partitive cases and related categories, pp. 63–86. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 54). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti and van der Auwera, Johan. 2007. Negative declaratives and negative imperatives: Similarities and differences. In Ammann, Andreas (ed.), Linguistics Festival, May 2006 Bremen, pp. 59–77. (Diversitas Linguarum 14). Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti and van der Auwera, Johan. 2011. Negation and perfective vs. imperfective aspect. In Mortelmans, Jesse, Mortelmans, Tanja and De Mulder, Walter (eds.), From now to eternity, pp. 65–84. (Cahiers Chronos 22). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti, Tamm, Anne and Wagner-Nagy, Beáta (eds.). 2015. Negation in Uralic languages. (Typological Studies in Language 108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Miller, Amy. 2001. A grammar of Jamul Tiipay. (Mouton Grammar Library 23). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith. 1971. Some cross-linguistic generalizations about yes–no questions and their answers. Working Papers on Language Universals 7, 45–193.Google Scholar

Mus, Nikolett. 2015. Negation in Tundra Nenets. In Miestamo, Matti, Tamm, Anne and Wagner-Nagy, Beáta (eds.), Negation in Uralic languages, pp. 75–101. (Typological Studies in Language 108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Nedjalkov, Igor’ V. 1994. Evenki. In Kahrel, Peter and van den Berg, René (eds.), Typological studies in negation, pp. 1–34. (Typological Studies in Language 29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Newman, Paul. 1970 A grammar of Tera. (University of California Publications in Linguistics 57). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Payne, John. R. 1985. Negation. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. I: Clause structure, pp. 197–242. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pilot-Raichoor, Christiane. 2010. The Dravidian zero negative: Diachronic context of its morphogenesis and conceptualisation. In Wohlgemuth, Jan and Cysouw, Michael (eds.), Rara and rarissima: Documenting the fringes of linguistic diversity, pp. 267–304. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

van Schaaik, Gerjan. 1994. Turkish. In Kahrel, Peter and van den Berg, René (eds.), Typological studies in negation, pp. 35–50. (Typological Studies in Language 29.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Schmid, Maureen Alicia. 1980. Co-occurrence restrictions in negative, interrogative, and conditional clauses: A cross-linguistic study. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar

Siegl, Florian. 2015. Negation in Forest Enets. In Miestamo, Matti, Tamm, Anne and Wagner-Nagy, Beáta (eds.), Negation in Uralic languages, pp. 45–73. (Typological Studies in Language 108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sneddon, James Neil. 1996. Indonesian: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Stevenson, R. C. 1969. Bagirmi grammar. (Linguistic Monograph Series 3). Khartoum: Sudan Research Unit, University of Khartoum.Google Scholar

Van Alsenoy, Lauren. 2014. A new typology of indefinite pronouns, with a focus on negative indefinites. PhD dissertation, University of Antwerp.Google Scholar

Van Alsenoy, Lauren and van der Auwera, Johan. 2015. Indefinite pronouns in Uralic languages. In Miestamo, Matti, Tamm, Anne and Wagner-Nagy, Beáta (eds.), Negation in Uralic languages, pp. 519–46. (Typological Studies in Language 108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Veselinova, Ljuba. 2013a. Negative existentials: A cross-linguistic study. Rivista di linguistica 25(1): 107–45.Google Scholar

Veselinova, Ljuba. 2013b. Lexicalization of negative senses: A cross-linguistic study. Paper given at the Tenth Biennal Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology (ALT 10), Leipzig, 16 August 2013.Google Scholar

Veselinova, Ljuba. 2014. The negative existential cycle revisited. Linguistics 52(6): 1327–89.Google Scholar

Veselinova, Ljuba. 2015. Special negators in the Uralic languages: Synchrony, diachrony and interaction with standard negation. In Miestamo, Matti, Tamm, Anne and Wagner-Nagy, Beáta (eds.), Negation in Uralic languages, pp. 547–99. (Typological Studies in Language 108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Weir, Helen. 1994. Nadëb. In Kahrel, Peter and van den Berg, René (eds.), Typological studies in negation, pp. 291–323. (Typological Studies in Language 29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. 2004. Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology 8: 1–58.Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. 2006. Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages. (Sign Language Typology Series 1). Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. [2005] 2013. Irregular negatives in sign languages. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), World atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/139. First published Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Zimmer, Karl E. 1964. Affixal negation in English and other languages: An investigation of restricted productivity. (Word Monograph 5). New York: The Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar

Abdoulaye, Mahamane L. 2004. Comitative, coordinating, and inclusory constructions in Hausa. In Haspelmath, Martin (ed.), Coordinating constructions, pp. 165–93. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Acquaviva, Paolo. 2008. Lexical plurals: A morphosemantic approach. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2008. The Manambu language of East Sepik, Papua New Guinea. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W.. 2011. Non-ergative associations between S and O. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Language at large: Essays on syntax and semantics, pp. 143–69. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Bach, Emmon, Jelinek, Eloise, Kratzer, Angelika and Partee, Barbara H. (eds.). 1995. Quantification in natural languages, Vol. I. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Baermen, Matthews and Brown, Dunstan. 2005. Syncretism in verbal person/number marking. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 122–5.Google Scholar

Bakker, Dik and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.). 2013. Languages across boundaries. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2010. Ad hoc categories. In Hogan, Patrick Holm (ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of language sciences, pp. 86–7. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bhat, D. N. S. 2004a. Pronouns. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bhat, D. N. S. 2004b. Conjunction and personal pronouns. In Haspelmath, (ed.), pp. 89–105.Google Scholar

Biermann, Anna. 1982. Die grammatische Kategorie Numerus. In Seiler, Hnsjakob and Lehmann, Christian (eds.), Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen, Teil I: Bereich und Ordnung der Phänomene, pp. 229–43. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cable, Seth. 2014. Distributive numerals and distance distributivity (and beyond). Language 90(3): 562–606.Google Scholar

Carpio, María Belén. 2014. ‘Restricted group’ and ‘group’ within the pronominal system of Western Toba (Guaicuruan, Argentina). Studies in Language 38(4): 982–94.Google Scholar

Chan, Eugene (compiler). 2009. Numeral systems of the world’s languages. Available online at: http://lingweb.eva.mpg.de/numeral.Google Scholar

Channell, Joanna. 1994. Vague language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Blackwell; 2nd edn, 1989.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1997. Some problems in the theory and typology of numeral systems. In Palek, B. (ed.), Proceedings of LP’96: Typology – prototypes, item orderings, and universals. Proceedings of the conference held in Prague August 20–22, 1996, pp. 41–56. Prague: Charles University Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 2004. The search for the perfect numeral system, with particular reference to Southeast Asia. Linguistik Indonesia 22, 137–45.Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2005. Suppletion in personal pronouns: Theory versus practice, and the place of reproducibility in typology. Linguistic Typology, 9(1): 1–23.Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2012. Features. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. and Mithun, Marianne. 1996. Associative forms in the typology of number systems: evidence from Yup’ik. Journal of Linguistics 31: 1–17.Google Scholar

Corstius, H. Brandt (ed.). 1968. Grammars for number words. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Cristofaro, Sonia. 2013. The referential hierarchy: Reviewing the evidence in diachronic perspective. In Bakker, et al. (eds.), pp. 69–93.Google Scholar

Cristofaro, Sonia. 2014. Competing motivations models and diachrony: What evidence for what motivations? In MacWhinney, et al. (eds.), pp. 282–98.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2003. Typology and universal, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cruse, D. A. 1999. Number and number systems. In Brown, Keith and Miller, Jim (eds.), Concise encyclopedia of grammatical categories, pp. 267–71. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael. 2003. The paradigmatic structure of person marking. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael. 2005a. A typology of honorific uses of clusivity. In Filimonova, (ed.), pp. 213–30.Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael. 2005b. Inclusive/exclusive forms of ‘we’. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 162–9.Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael. 2011. The expression of person and number: A typologist’s perspective. Morphology 21: 419–43.Google Scholar

Daniel, Michael. 2000. Tipologija associativnoj mnozhestvennosti [The typology of associative plurals]. Doctoral dissertation, Moscow University.Google Scholar

Daniel, Michael. 2005a. Plurality in independent personal pronouns. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 146–9.Google Scholar

Daniel, Michael. 2005b. Understanding inclusive. In Filimonova, (ed.), pp. 3–48.Google Scholar

Daniel, Michael and Moravcsik, Edith. 2005. Associative plurals. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 150–3.Google Scholar

Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1985. Hixkaryana and linguistic typology. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar

De Rijk, Rudolf P. G. 2008. Standard Basque: A progressive grammar, Vol. I: The grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1980. The languages of Australia. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2010. Basic linguistic theory, Vol. II. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2012. Basic linguistic theory, Vol. III. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Downing, Pamela. 1996. Numeral classifier systems: The case of Japanese. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang. 1968. Studien zur verbalen Pluralität, Iterativum, Distributivum, Durativum, Intensivum in der allgemeinen Grammatik, im Lateinischen und Hethitischen. Graz and Wien: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1989. Plural words. Linguistics 27: 865–95.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2005. Coding of nominal plurality. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 138–41.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas. 2006. Dyad constructions. In Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, pp. 24–8. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Everett, Daniel L. 1986. Pirahã. In Derbyshire, Desmond C. and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. I, pp. 200–325. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Filimonova, Elena. 2005a. Clusivity cross-linguistically: Common trends and possible patterns. In Filimonova, (ed.), pp. 399–424.Google Scholar

Filimonova, Elena (ed.). 2005b. Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive-exclusive distinction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Forchheimer, Paul. 1953. The category of person in language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1997. Grammaticalization of number: From demonstratives to nominal and verbal plural. Linguistic Typology 1: 193–242.Google Scholar

Francis, Elaine J. and Yuasa, Etsuyo. 2008. A multi-modular approach to gradual change in grammaticalization. Journal of Linguistics 44: 45–86.Google Scholar

Ghaniabadi, Saffed. 2012. Plural marking beyond count nouns. In Massam, (ed.), pp. 112–28.Google Scholar

Ghomeshi, Jila and Massam, Diane. 2012. The count mass distinction: issues and perspectives. In Massam, (ed.), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Gil, David. 1988. Georgian reduplication and the domain of distributivity. Linguistics 26(6): 1039–65.Google Scholar

Gil, David. 1995. Universal quantifiers and distributivity. In Bach, et al. (eds.), pp. 321–62.Google Scholar

Gil, David. 1996. Maltese ‘collective nouns’: A typological perspective. Rivista di Linguistica 8(1): 53–87.Google Scholar

Gil, David. 2005a. Distributive numerals. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 222–6.Google Scholar

Gil, David. 2005b. Numeral classifiers. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 226–9.Google Scholar

Goddard, Cliff and Wierzbicka, Anna. 2014. Semantic fieldwork and lexical universals. Studies in Language 38(1): 80–126.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of language, pp. 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1972. Numeral classifiers and substantival number: problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. Working Papers on Language Universals 9: 1–39. Reprinted in Denning, Keith and Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, pp. 194–206. Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. Generalizations about numeral systems. In Greenberg, (ed.), Universals of human language, Vol. III: Word structure, pp. 249–95. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 2005. Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Grimm, Scott. 2012. Individuation and inverse number marking in Dagaare. In Massam, (ed.), pp. 75–98.Google Scholar

Harbour, Daniel. 2014. Paucity, abundance, and the theory of number. Language 90(1): 185–229.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. Diachronic sources of ‘all’ and ‘every’. In Bach, et al. (eds.), pp. 363–82.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. Coordinating constructions. An overview. In Haspelmath, (ed.), Coordinating constructions, pp. 3–39. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2005. Occurrence of nominal plurality. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 142–5.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Coordination. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. II: Complex constructions, pp. 1–51. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. Argument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. In Bakker, et al. (eds.), pp. 197–226.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin and Karjus, Andres. 2015. Explaining asymmetries in number marking: Singulatives, plurative, and usage frequency. Manuscript.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David and Comrie, Bernard (eds.). 2005. The world atlas of language structures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Head, Brian F. 1978. Respect degrees in pronominal reference. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Vol. III: Word structure, pp. 151–211. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World lexicon or grammaticalization. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Helmbrecht, Johannes. 2004. Ikonizität in Personalpronomina. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 23: 211–44.Google Scholar

Helmbrecht, Johannes. 2014, Politeness distinctions in pronouns: A case study in competing motivations. In MacWhinney, et al. (eds.), pp. 315–32.Google Scholar

Honti, László. 1999. The numeral system of the Uralic languages. In Gvozdanovič, Jadranka (ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide, pp. 243–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hume, David. [1739–40] 1978. A treatise of human nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Originally published London: John Noon.Google Scholar

Hurford, James R. 1975. The linguistic theory of numerals. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hurford, James R. 1987. Language and number: The emergence of a cognitive system. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Inoue, Kyoko. 2000. Visualizing ability and nominal classification: Evidence of cultural operation in the agreement rules of Japanese numeral classifiers. In Senft, (ed.), pp. 217–69.Google Scholar

Iturrioz Leza, J. L. and Skopeteas, S. 2004. Numerus. In Booij, Geert E., Lehmann, Christian and Mugdan, Joachim (eds.), Morphologie: Ein internationals Handbuch zur Rexion und Wortbilding, Vol. II, pp. 1053–66. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Jensen, Hans. 1952. Die sprachliche Kategorie des Numerus. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Universität Rostock, Gesellschafts- und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe 1(2): 1–21.Google Scholar

Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 1998. Coordination. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kapeliuk, Olga. 1989. Appurtenance as a linguistic concept. Folia Linguistica 23(3/4): 341–52.Google Scholar

Landman, Fred. 2000. Events and pluralities: The Jerusalem lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2009. Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Universal and typological aspects of agreement. In Seiler, Hansjakob and Stachowiak, Franz Josesf (eds.), Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen. Teil II: Die Techniken und ihr Zusammenhang in Einzelsprachen, pp. 201–67. Tübingen; Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich and Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Li, XuPing. 2013. Numeral classifiers in Chinese: The syntax–semantics interface. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 2000. Inclusory pronominals. Oceanic Linguistics 39(1): 1–32.Google Scholar

Link, Godehard. 1991. Quantity and number. In Zaefferer, Dietmar (ed.), Semantic universals and universal semantics, pp. 133–49. Berlin: Foris.Google Scholar

Lipczuk, Ryszard. 1980. The Stellung der Zahlwörter im Rahmen der Wortarten. Darmstadt: Kümmerle.Google Scholar

Lucy, John A. 1992. Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian, Malchukov, Andrej and Moravcsik, Edith (eds.). 2014. Competing motivations in grammar and usage. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Markmann, Ellen M. 1989. Categorization and naming in children: Problems of induction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Martinez Areta, M. 2009. The category of number in Basque: I. Synchronic and historical aspects. Fontes Linguae Vasconum; Studia e Documenta 110: 63–98.Google Scholar

Massam, Diana (ed.). 2012. Count and mass across languages. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mauri, Caterina. 2014. What do connectives and plurals have in common? The linguistic expression of ad hoc categories. In Blochowiak, Joanna, Durrlemann-Tame, Stéphanie, Grisot, Cristina and Laenzlinger, Christopher C. (eds.), Linguistic papers dedicated to Jacques Moeschler, pp. 1–21. (University of Geneva Publication). Available online at: www.unige.ch/lettres/linguistique/moeschler/Festschrift/Festschrift.php.Google Scholar

Michaelis, Susanne, Maurer, Philippe, Haspelmath, Martin and Huber, Magnus (eds.). 2013. The atlas of Pidgin and Creole language structures. Oxford University Press. Available online at: http://apics-online.info/.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1988a. Lexical categories and the evolution of number marking. In Hammond, Michael and Noonan, Michael (eds.), Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics, pp. 211–34. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1988b. The grammaticization of coordination. In Haiman, John and Thompson, Sandra (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, pp. 331–59. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of North America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moltmann, Friederike. 1997. Parts and wholes in semantics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith A. 1978a. Agreement. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of human language, Vol. IV: Syntax, pp. 331–74. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith A. 1978b. Reduplicative constructions. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of human language, Vol. III: Word structure, pp. 297–334. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith A. 1978c. On the distribution of ergative and accusative patterns. Lingua 45: 233–79.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith A. 2003. A semantic analysis of associative plurals. Studies in Language 27(3): 469–503.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Edith A. 2009. Partonomic structures in syntax. In Evans, Vyvyan and Pourcel, Stéphanie (eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics, pp. 269–85. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Moyse-Faurie, Claire and Lynch, John. 2004. Coordination in Oceanic languages and in Proto-Oceanic. In Haspelmath, Martin (ed.), Coordinating constructions, pp. 445–97. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter and Harré, Rom. 1990. Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Newman, Paul. 1990. Nominal and verbal plurality in Chadic. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna. 2013. The origin and evolution of case-suppletive pronouns: Eurasian evidence. In Bakker, et al. (eds.), pp. 313–45.Google Scholar

Overstreet, Maryann. 1999. Whales, candlelight and stuff like that. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pelletier, Francis Jeffry. 2010. Lexical nouns are both +Mass and +Count, but they are neither +Mass nor +Count. In Massam, (ed.), pp. 9–26.Google Scholar

Plank, Frans. 1985. Die Ordnung der Personen. Folia Linguistica 19: 111–76.Google Scholar

Plank, Frans. 1987. Number neutralization in Old English: Failure of functionalism? In Koopman, William, van der Leek, Frederike, Fischer, Olga and Eaton, Roger (eds.), Explanation and linguistic change, pp. 177–238. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Plank, Frans. 1989. On Humboldt on the dual. In Corrigan, Roberta, Eckman, Fred and Noonan, Michael (eds.), Linguistic categorization, pp. 293–333. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Plank, Frans. 2009. Senary summary so far. Linguistic Typology 13(2): 337–45.Google Scholar

Plank, Frans and Schellinger, Wolfgang. 1997. The uneven distribution of genders over numbers: Greenberg Nos. 37 and 45. Linguistic Typology 1(1): 53–101.Google Scholar

Pfau, Roland and Steinbach, Markus. 2006. Pluralization in sign and in speech: A cross-modal typological study. Linguistic Typology 10(2): 135–82.Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan. 2002. The noun phrase. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rubino, Carl. 2005. Reduplication. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 114–17.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Linda. 1988. Asymmetric feature distribution in pronominal ‘coordinations’. In Barlow, Michael and Ferguson, Charles A. (eds.), Agreement in natural language, pp. 237–49. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar

Seiler, Hansjakob. 1986. Apprehension: Language, object, and order. Part III: The universal dimension of apprehension. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Senft, Gunter (ed.). 2000. Systems of nominal classification. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna and Bakker, Dik. 2013. Suppletion in person forms: The role of iconicity and frequency. In Bakker, et al. (eds.), pp. 347–95.Google Scholar

Simon, Horst J. 2005. Only you? Philological investigations into the alleged inclusive-exclusive distinction in the second person plural. In Filimonova, (ed.), pp. 113–50.Google Scholar

Southern, Mark R. V. 2005. Contagious couplings: Transmission of expressives in Yiddish echo phrases. Westport, CT and London: Praeger.Google Scholar

Stassen, Leon. 2000. AND-languages and WITH-languages. Linguistic Typology 4(1): 1–54.Google Scholar

Stassen, Leon. 2005. Noun phrase conjunction. In Haspelmath, et al. (ed.), pp. 258–61.Google Scholar

Stolz, Thomas and Veselinova, Ljuba N.. 2005. Ordinal numerals. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 218–21.Google Scholar

Stolz, Thomas, Stroh, Cornelia and Urdze, Aina. 2005. Comitatives and instrumentals. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 214–17.Google Scholar

Stolz, Thomas, Stroh, Cornelia and Urdze, Aina. 2006. On comitative and related categories: A typological study with special focus on the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Terrill, Angela. 2003. A grammar of Lavukaleve. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Tversky, Barbara. 1990. Where partonomies and taxonomies meet. In Tsohatzidis, Savas L. (ed.), Meanings and prototypes, pp. 334–44. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Xrakovskij, Viktor S. 1997. Semantic types of plurality and their natural classification. In Xrakovskij, Viktor S. (ed.), Typology of iterative constructions, pp. 3–64. Munich and Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Wälchli, Bernhard. 2009. Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Watkins, Laurel J. 1984. A grammar of Kiowa. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1988. Oats and wheat: Mass nouns, iconicity, and human categorization. In The semantics of grammar, pp. 499–560. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Wiese, Heike. 2003. Numbers, language, and the human mind. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wiese, Heike. 2012. Collectives in the intersection of mass and count nouns: A cross-linguistic account. In Massam, (ed.), pp. 54–74.Google Scholar

Wiesemann, U. (ed.). 1986. Pronominal systems. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 2012. Decompositing the mass/count distinction: Evidence from languages that lack it. In Massam, (ed.), pp. 146–71.Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike, Ernesto, Cesar Delgado, Escobedo, Dikyuva, Hasan, Panda, Sibaju and de Vos, Connie. 2013. Cardinal numerals in rural sign language: approaching cross-modal typology. Linguistic Typology 17(3): 357–96.Google Scholar

Zwicky, Arnold M. 1977. Hierarchies of person. In Beach, W. A., Fox, S. E. and Philosoph, S. (eds.), Papers from the thirteenth regional meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, April 14–16, 1977, pp. 714–33. Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

Adaskina, Y. V. 2005. Tipologicheskii analiz konstruktsii s frustrativnym znacheniem [Typological analysis of constructions with frustrative value]. Master’s thesis, Faculty of Philology, Moscow State University.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999. Arawak. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), The Amazonian languages, pp. 65–106. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. A grammar of Tariana, from Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. The languages of the Amazon. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Allin, T. R. 1976. A grammar of Resigaro. PhD thesis, University of St Andrews.Google Scholar

Brandão, Ana Paula. 2010. Verb morphology in Pareci-Haliti (Arawak). Qualifying paper. University of Texas. Austin.Google Scholar

Brandão, Ana Paula. 2014. A reference grammar of Paresi-Haliti (Arawak). PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle. 2012. Typological characteristics of South American indigenous languages. In Campbell, Lyle and Grondona, Verónica (eds.), The indigenous languages of South America, pp. 259–330. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Carlin, Eithne B. 2004. A grammar of Trio: A Cariban language of Suriname. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Carlin, Eithne B. 2006. Feeling the Need: The borrowing of Cariban functional categories into Mawayana (Arawak). In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Grammars in contact, pp. 313–32. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chacon, Thiago. 2012. The phonology and morphology of Kubeo: The documentation, theory, and description of an Amazonian language. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai‘i, Manoa.Google Scholar

Corbera Mori, Angel. 1994. Fonología e gramática do Aguaruna (Jívaro). PhD dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar

da Cruz, Aline. 2011. Fonologia e gramática do Nheengatú: A língua geral falada pelos povos Baré, Warekena e Baniwa. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1985. Hixkaryana and linguistic typology. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar

Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1987. Morphosyntactic areal characteristics of Amazonian languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 53(3): 311–26.Google Scholar

Dietrich, Wolf. 2006. La categoría del ‘frustrativo’ en las lenguas tupí-guaraníes. In Dietrick, W. and Symeonidis, H. (eds.), Guaraní y ‘Mawetí-Tupí-Guaraní’: Estudios históricos y descriptivos sobre una familia lingüística de América del Sur, pp. 71–85. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2004. The Jarawara language of southern Amazonia. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.. 1999. Introduction. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), The Amazonian languages, pp. 1–21. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.. (eds.). 1999. The Amazonian languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Epps, Patience. 2005. A grammar of Hup. PhD dissertation, University of Virginia.Google Scholar

Epps, Patience. 2008. A grammar of Hup. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (MGL 43).Google Scholar

Epps, Patience and Salanova, Andrés P.. 2012. A linguística amazônica hoje. LIAMES 12: 7–37.Google Scholar

Everett, Daniel L. 1986. Piraha. In Derbyshire, D. C. and Pullum, G. K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. I, pp. 200–325. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Facundes, Sidney Da Silva. 2000. The language of the Apurinã people of Brazil (Maipure/Arawak). PhD dissertation, SUNY Buffalo.Google Scholar

Facundes, Sidney Da Silva 2014. Negation in Apurinã (Arawak). In Michael, Lev and Granadillo, Tania (eds.), Negation in Arawak languages, pp. 121–46. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Faust, Norma and Loos, Eugene. 2002. Gramática del idioma Yaminahua. (Serie Lingüística Peruana 51). Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Fleck, David W. 2003. A grammar of Matsés. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar

Galúcio, Ana Vilacy. 2001. The morphosyntax of Mekens (Tupi). PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Galúcio, Ana Vilacy. 2014. Discourse and epistemic modality in Mekens: The frustrative construction. Revista Linguística 10(2): 163–78.Google Scholar

Girón, Jesús Mario. 2008. Una gramática del Wã́nsöjöt (Puinave). PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Guillaume, Antoine. 2008. A grammar of Cavineña. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Robert E. 1998. Wai Wai. In Derbyshire, D. C. and Pullum, G. K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. IV, pp. 25–224. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hanson, Rebecca. 2010. A grammar of Yine (Piro). PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.Google Scholar

Hyde, Sylvia. 1980. Diccionario Amahuaca. (Serie Lingüística Peruana 7). Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Jensen, Cheryl. 1998. Comparative Tupí-Guaraní morphosyntax. In Derbyshire, D. C. and Pullum, G. K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. IV, pp. 489–618. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Jones, W. and Jones, P.. 1991. Barasano syntax. University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar

Kerr, Isabel J. 1995. Gramática pedagógica del cuiba-wámonae. Bogotá: Asociación Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Klumpp, Deloris. 1990. Piapoco grammar. Colombia: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Kuteva, Tania. 1998. On identifying an evasive gram: Action narrowly averted.Studies in Language 22(1): 113–60.Google Scholar

Larson, M. L. 1963. Emic classes which manifest the obligatory tagmemes in major independent clause types of Aguaruna (Jivaro). In Waterhouse, Viola G. (ed.), Studies in Peruvian Indian languages 1. pp. 1–36. (SIL Publications in Linguistics No. 9). Norman: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar

Malchukov, Andrej L. 2004. Towards a semantic typology of adversative and contrast marking. Journal of Semantics 21: 177–98.Google Scholar

Martins, Silvana Andrade. 2004. Fonologia e gramática Dâw. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

Meira, Sérgio. 1999. A grammar of Tiriyó. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar

Michael, Lev D. 2008. Nanti evidential practice: Language, knowledge, and social action in an Amazonian society. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Michael, Lev D. 2009. The semantics of clause linking in Iquito. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), The semantics of clause-linking: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 145–66. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mihas, Elena. 2010. Essentials of Ashéninka Perené grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.Google Scholar

Mihas, Elena. 2015. A grammar of Alto Perené (Arawak). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Miller, Marion. 1999. Desano grammar: Studies in the languages of Colombia 6. Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar

Montag, Susan. 1981. Diccionario Cashinahua: Tomo II. Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Morse, Nancy L. and Maxwell, Michael B.. 1999. Cubeo grammar. Studies in the Languages of Colombia 5. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar

Müller, Neele. 2013. Tense, aspect, modality, and evidentiality marking in South American indigenous languages. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar

Olawsky, Knut J. 2006. A grammar of Urarina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Overall, Simon E. 2007. A grammar of Aguaruna. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.Google Scholar

Payne, David L. 1981. The phonology and morphology of Axininca Campa. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar

Payne, David L. 1990. Some widespread grammatical forms in South American languages. In Payne, Doris (ed.), Amazonian linguistics, pp. 75–87. Dallas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Payne, Doris. 2001. Review of The Amazonian languages (Dixon and Aikhenvald 1999). Language 77(3): 594–8.Google Scholar

Payne, Thomas E. 2012. A typological grammar of Panare. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Plungian, V. A. 2001. Antirezultativ: Do i posle rezul’tata [The antiresultative: Before and after the result.] In Plungian, V. A. (ed.), Glagol’nyye kategorii: Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki 1 [Verbal categories: Studies in grammatical theory 1], pp. 50–88. Moscow: Russkiye slovari.Google Scholar

Plungian, V. A. and van der Auwera, J.. 2006. Towards a typology of discontinuous past marking. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 59(4): 317–49.Google Scholar

Queixalós, Francisco. 1991. Entre Cantos y Llantos: Tradición oral sikuani. Bogotá: Publicaciones de Etnollano.Google Scholar

Queixalós, Francisco. 2000. Syntaxe Sikuani (Colombie). Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar

Ramirez, Henri. 1997. A fala tukano dos ye’pa-masa. Tomo 1: Gramática. Manaus: CEDEM.Google Scholar

Galindo, Reinoso, Eduardo, Andrés. 2002. Elementos para una gramática de la lengua piapoco. (Colección Premios Nacionales de Cultura). Bogotá: Ministerio de Cultura.Google Scholar

Rose, Françoise. 2003. Morphosyntaxe de l’émérillon: Langue tupi-guarani de Guyane française. PhD dissertation, Lyon.Google Scholar

Saad, George M. 2014. A grammar sketch of Shuar: With a focus on the verb phrase. MA thesis, MPI Neijmegen.Google Scholar

Sakel, Jeanette. 2003. A grammar of Mosetén. PhD dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar

Sakel, Jeanette. 2004. A grammar of Mosetén. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Scott, Marie. 2004. Vocabulario Sharanahua – Castellano. Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Seki, Lucy. 2000. Gramática da língua Kamaiurá. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar

Sheldon, S. N. 1988. Os sufixos verbais Múra-Pirahã [Mura-Pirahã verbal suffixes], Vol. II, ed. Grimes, J. E. pp. 147–75. ((Série Lingüística 9). Brasília: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Silva, Cácio and Silva, Elisângela. 2012. A língua dos Yuhupdeh: Introdução etnolínguística, dicionário Yuhup-Português e glossário semântico-gramatical. São Gabriel da Cachoeira: Pró-Amazônia.Google Scholar

Snell, Betty. 1998. Pequeño Diccionario Machiguenga – Castellano. Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Sparing-Chávez, Margarethe. 2003. I want to but I can’t: The frustrative in Amahuaca. SIL Electronic Working Papers 2003–002. Available online at: www.sil.org/silewp/abstract.asp?ref=2003002.Google Scholar

Sparing-Chávez, Margarethe. 2012. Aspects of the Amahuaca grammar: An endangered language of the Amazon basin. SIL e-book 51. Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar

Stenzel, Kristine. 2004. A reference grammar of Wanano. PhD dissertation, Colorado.Google Scholar

Strom, C. 1992. Retuarã syntax. Studies in the Languages of Colombia 3. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar

Swift, Kenneth. 1988. Morfología de Caquinte. Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Taylor, Gerald. 2010. O ‘caduco’ e o ‘frustrativo’ nas Línguas Baniwa do Içana e Nheengatu (Alto Rio Negro, Brasil). In Carlin, E. and van de Kerke, S. (eds.), Linguistics and archaeology in the Americas, pp. 207–14. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Thiesen, Wesley. 1996. Gramática del idioma Bora. (Serie Lingüística Peruana 38). Pucallpa, Peru: Ministerio de Educación; Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Turner, Glen D. 1992. Una breve gramática del Shuar, ed. Levinsohn, Stephen H.. (Cuadernos Etnolingüísticos 19). Quito: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Valenzuela, Pilar M. 2003. Transitivity in Shipibo-Konibo grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.Google Scholar

Van der Voort, Hein. 2000. A grammar of Kwaza. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Van der Voort, Hein. 2004. A grammar of Kwaza. (Mouton Grammar Library 29). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Van Gijn, Rik. 2006. A grammar of Yurakaré. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar

Villafañe, Lucrecia. 2004. Gramática Yuki: Lengua Tupí-Guaraní de Bolivia. Ediciones del Rectorado, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Argentina.Google Scholar

Zariquiey, Roberto. 2011. A grammar of Kashibo-Kakataibo. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2008. Semi-direct speech: Manambu and beyond. Language Sciences 30: 383–422.Google Scholar

Ameka, Felix K. 2004. Grammar and cultural practices: The grammaticalization of triadic communication in West African languages. The Journal of West African Languages 30(3/4): 5–28.Google Scholar

Ameka, Felix K. 2008. Aspect and modality in Ewe: A survey. In Ameka, Felix K. and Dakubu, M. E. Kropp (eds.), Aspect and modality in Kwa languages, pp. 135–94. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Ameka, Felix K. and Breedveld, Anneke. 2004. Areal cultural scripts for social interaction in West African communities. Intercultural pragmatics 1(2): 167–87.Google Scholar

Andersen, Torben. 1999. Anti-logophoricity and indirect mode in Mabaan. Studies in Language 23(3): 499–530.Google Scholar

Banfield, Ann. [1982] 2014. Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction. (Routledge Revivals). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bamgboṣe, Ayo. 1986. Reported speech in Yoruba. In Coulmas, Florian (ed.), Direct and indirect speech, pp. 77–98. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bond, Oliver. 2006. A broader perspective on point of view: Logophoricity in Ogonoid languages. In Mugane, John, Hutchinson, John P. and Worman, Dee A. (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: African languages and linguistics in broad perspective, pp. 234–44. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Available online at: www.lingref.com, document #1313.Google Scholar

Bohnhoff, Lee E. 1986. ya.g Dii (Duro) pronouns. In Wiesemann, Ursula (ed.), Pronominal systems, pp. 103–29. (Continuum 5). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Bugaeva, Anna. 2008. Reported discourse and logophoricity in Southern Hokkaido dialects of Ainu. Gengo Kenkyuu 133: 31–75.Google Scholar

Clements, George N. 1975. The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse. The Journal of West African Languages 10: 141–77.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 2004. West African logophorics and the typology of reference-tracking. The Journal of West African Languages 30(3/4): 94–103.Google Scholar

Coulmas, Florian (ed.). 1986. Direct and indirect speech. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Culy, Christopher. 1994a. Aspects of logophoric marking. Linguistics 32(6): 1055–94.Google Scholar

Culy, Christopher. 1994b. A note on logophoricity in Dogon. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 15(2): 113–25.Google Scholar

Culy, Christopher. 1997. Logophoric pronouns and point of view. Linguistics 35(5): 845–59.Google Scholar

Curnow, Timothy Jowan. 2002. Three types of verbal logophoricity in African languages. Studies in African Linguistics 31(1/2): 1–26.Google Scholar

Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. 2001. Logophoric marking and represented speech in African languages as evidential hedging strategies. Australian Journal of Linguistics 21(1): 131–57.Google Scholar

Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. 2014. The grammar of knowledge in Tima. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 245–61. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Essegbey, James. 1994. Anaphoric phenomena in Ewe. MPhil. thesis. University of Trondheim.Google Scholar

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1985. Logophoric systems in Chadic. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 7(1): 23–37.Google Scholar

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 2001. A grammar of Lele. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom. 2003. Logophoricity in Africa: An attempt to explain and evaluate the significance of its modern distribution. STUF-Language Typology and Universals 56(4): 366–87.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom. 2008a. The Macro-Sudan belt: Towards identifying a linguistic area in northern sub-Saharan Africa. In Heine, Bernd and Nurse, Derek (eds.), A linguistic geography of Africa, pp. 151–85. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom. 2008b. Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Güldemann, Tom and von Roncador, Manfred (eds.). 2002. Reported discourse: A meeting ground for different linguistic domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hagège, Claude. 1974. Les pronoms logophoriques. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 69: 287–310.Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffery. 2008. A grammar of Jamsay, a Dogon language. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Hedinger, Robert. 1984. Reported speech in Akɔɔse. The Journal of West African Languages 14(1): 81–102.Google Scholar

Hellwig, Birgit. 2011. A grammar of Goemai. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Reh, Mechthild. 1984. Grammaticalisation and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar

Hill, Harriet. 1995. Pronouns and reported speech in Adioukrou. The Journal of West African Languages 25(1): 87–106.Google Scholar

Hill, Jane H. and Irvine, Judith T.. 1992. Introduction. In Hill, Jane H. and Irvine, Judith T. (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse, pp. 1–23. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Holt, Elizabeth and Clift, Rebecca (eds.). 2006. Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huang, Yan. 2000 Anaphora: A cross-linguistic approach. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. and Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Logophoric reference in Gokana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3: 19–37.Google Scholar

Ikoro, Suanu M. 1996. The Kana language. (CNWS Publications 40). Leiden: Research School CNWS.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. [1971] 1990. Shifters, categories, and the Russian verb. In Selected writings: Word and language, pp. 130–53. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar

Kibrik, Andrej A. 2011. Reference in discourse. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kwuamuar, Sebastian. 1997. Ewɔ moya na Tɔgbi Agɔkɔli [It surprised Chief Agokoli]. Accra: Bureau of Ghana Languages.Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse and empathy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, Claire and Brousseau, Anne-Marie. 2002. A grammar of Fongbe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 1988. Putting linguistics on a proper footing: explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. In Drew, Paul and Wootton, A. (eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order, pp. 161–227. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Lucy, John A. 1993. Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nikitina, Tatiana. 2012. Logophoric discourse and first person reporting in Wan (West Africa). Anthropological Linguistics 54(3): 280–301.Google Scholar

Sells, Peter. 1987. Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic inquiry 18(3): 445–79.Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Soubrier, Aude. 2013. L’ikposso uwi Phonologie, grammaire, textes, lexique. PhD thesis, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon.Google Scholar

Speas, Margaret 2004. Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 114: 255–76.Google Scholar

Stirling, Lesley. 1993 Switch-reference and discourse representation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tarr, Delbert Howard Jr. 1979. Indirection and ambiguity as a mode of communication in West Africa: a descriptive survey. PhD thesis. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar

Thomas, Elaine. 1978. A grammatical description of the Engenni language. (Summer Institute of Linguistics Publications in Linguistics 60). Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar

von Roncador, Manfred. 1992. Types of logophoric marking in African languages. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 13: 163–82.Google Scholar

Voloshinov, V. N. 1973. Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar

Westermann, Diedrich. 1907. Grammatik der Ewe-Sprache. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Westermann, Diedrich. 1930. A study of the Ewe language. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wiesemann, Ursula (ed.). 1986. Pronominal systems. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Wiesemann, Ursula (ed.). 1990. A model for the study of reported speech in African languages. The Journal of West African Languages 20(2): 75–80.Google Scholar

Yankah, Kwesi. 1995. Speaking for the chief: Okyeame and the politics of Akan royal oratory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. A grammar of Tariana, from northwest Amazonia. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. The languages of the Amazon. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Allen, Janet L. 2014. Kankanaey: A role and reference grammar analysis. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. and Kiparsky, Paul (eds.). 1973. A festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Aoun, Joseph. 1985. A grammar of anaphora. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Aoun, Joseph. 1986. Generalized binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Arnold, Doug, Atkinson, Martin, Durand, Jacques, Grover, Claire and Sadler, Louisa (eds.). 1989. Essays on grammatical theory and Universal Grammar. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Assmann, Anke. 2012. Switch-reference as interclausal tense agreement: Evidence from Quechua. In Weisser, P. (ed.), Perspectives on switch-reference: Local modeling and empirical distribution, pp. 41–82. (Linguistische Arbeits Berichte, 89). Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar

Austin, Peter. 1981. Switch-reference in Australia. Language 57: 309–34.Google Scholar

Austin, Peter. (ed.). 1988. Complex sentences in Australian languages. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bruce, Les P. 1984. The Alamblak language of Papua New Guinea (East Sepik). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Butler, William. 1981. Preliminary notes on Banaro grammar. Ms. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Camacho, José. 2010. On case concord: The syntax of switch-reference clauses. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28(2): 239–74.Google Scholar

Carnie, Andrew, Jelinek, Eloise and Willie, Maryann (eds.). 2000. Papers in honor of Ken Hale: MIT Working Papers on endangered and less familiar languages #1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cole, Peter. 1983. Switch-reference in two Quechua languages. In Haiman, and Munro, (eds.), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1983. Switch-reference in Huichol: A typological study. In Haiman, and Munro, (eds.), pp. 17–37.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Some general properties of reference-tracking systems. In Arnold, et al. (eds.), pp. 37–51.Google Scholar

Cook, Eung-Do, Gerdts, Donna and Anderson, Stephen R. (eds.). 1984. Syntax and semantics 16: The syntax of Native American Languages. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Davies, John. 1981. Kobon. (Lingua Descriptive Series 3). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Dench, Alan. 1988. Complex sentences in Martuthunira. In Austin, (ed.), pp. 97–139.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.). 1976. Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute for Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.). 1999. The Amazonian languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Finer, Daniel. 1985a. The formal grammar of switch-reference. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Finer, Daniel. 1985b. The syntax of switch-reference. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 35–55.Google Scholar

Fischer, Rafael. 2007. Clause linkage in Cofán (A’ingae). In Wetzels, (ed.), pp. 381–99.Google Scholar

Fischer, Rafael and van Lier, Eva. 2011. Cofán subordinate clauses in a typology of subordination. In van Gijn, et al. (eds.), pp. 221–50.Google Scholar

Foley, William A. and Van Valin, Robert Jr. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fortescue, Michael. 1991. Switch reference anomalies and ‘topic’ in West Greenlandic: A case of pragmatics over syntax. In Verschueren, (ed.), pp. 53–77.Google Scholar

Franklin, Karl J. 1983. Some features of interclausal reference in Kewa. In Haiman, and Munro, (eds.), pp. 39–49.Google Scholar

Georgi, Doreen. 2012. Switch reference by movement. In Weisser, P. (ed.), Perspectives on switch-reference: Local modeling and empirical distribution, pp. 1–40. (Linguistische Arbeits Berichte, 89). University of Leipzig.Google Scholar

Gijn, Rik. 2006. A grammar of Yurakaré. PhD, Radboud University, Nijmegen.Google Scholar

Gijn, Rik. 2012. Switch-attention (aka switch-reference) in South-American temporal clauses: Facilitating oral transmission. Linguistic Discovery 10(1): 112–27.Google Scholar

Gijn, Rik, Haude, Katharina and Muysken, Pieter (eds.). 2011. Subordination in native South American languages. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gijn, Rik, Hammond, Jeremy, Matić, Dejan, van Putten, Saskia and Galucio, Ana Vilacy (eds.). 2014. Information structure and reference tracking in complex sentences. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In Li, (ed.), pp. 149–88.Google Scholar

Goddard, C. 1983. A semantically-oriented grammar of the Yankunytjatjara dialect of the Western Desert language. PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar

Gordon, Lynn. 1983. Switch-reference, clause order, and interclausal relationships in Maricopa. In Haiman, and Munro, (eds.), pp. 83–104.Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1980. Hua: A Papuan language of the Eastern Highlands of New Guinea. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Haiman, John and Munro, Pamela (eds.). 1983. Switch-reference and universal grammar. (Typological Studies in Language 2). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth. 1973. Person marking in Warlbiri. In Anderson, and Kiparsky, (eds.), pp. 308–44.Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth. 1982. Some essential features of Warlpiri verbal clauses. In Swartz, Stephen (ed.), Papers in Warlpiri grammar: In memory of Lothar Jagst, pp. 217–315. (Work-Papers of SIL-AAB, Series A Vol. 6). Berrimah, NT: SIL-AAB.Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth. 1983. Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1(1): 5–47.Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth. 1991. Misumalpan verb sequencing constructions. In Lefebvre, (ed.), pp. 1–36.Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth. 1992. Subject obviation, switch reference, and control. In Larson, et al. (eds.), pp. 51–77.Google Scholar

Hammond, Jeremy. 2014. Switch-reference antecedence and subordination in Whitesands (Oceanic). In van Gijn, et al. (eds.), pp. 265–90.Google Scholar

Harris, Kyle. 1990. Nend grammar essentials. In Roberts, John R., (ed.), Two grammatical studies, pp. 73–156. (Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages 37). Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics. Available online at: www.sil.org/pacific/png/abstract.asp?id=928474523637.Google Scholar

Headland, Paul and Levinsohn, Stephen. 1977. Prominence and cohesion in Tunebo discourse. In Longacre, and Woods, (eds.), pp. 133–8.Google Scholar

Hornstein, Norbert, Nunes, Jairo and Grohman, Kleanthes K.. 2005. Understanding minimalism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huang, Yan. 2000. Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry and Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Logophoric reference in Gokana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3: 19–37.Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell and Bittle, W. (eds.), Studies in Southwestern ethnolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, William H. 1967. Switch-reference in Hokan-Coahuiltecan. In Hymes, and Bittle, (eds.), pp. 238–63.Google Scholar

Jacobsen, William H. 1983. Typological and genetic notes on switch-reference systems in North American Indian languages. In Haiman, and Munro, (eds.), pp. 151–83.Google Scholar

Kendall, Martha. 1976. Special problems in Yavapai syntax: The Verde Valley dialect. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Keine, Stefan. 2010. Deconstructing switch-reference. Available online at: www.uni-leipzig.de/~stkeine/papers/switch-reference.pdf.Google Scholar

Klavans, Judith L. 1995. On clitics and cliticization: The interaction of morphology, phonology, and syntax. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Langdon, Margaret and Munro, Pamela. 1979. Subject and (switch)-reference in Yuman. Folia Linguistica 13: 321–44.Google Scholar

Larson, Richard K., Iatridou, Sabine, Lahiri, Utpal and Higginbotham, James (eds.). 1992. Control and grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, Claire (ed.). 1991. Serial verbs: Grammatical, comparative, and cognitive approaches. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. (ed.). 1976. Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Longacre, Robert E. and Woods, Frances (eds.). 1977. Discourse grammar studies in the languages of Colombia, Panama, and Ecuador, Vol. II. Norman, OK.: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Lynch, John. 1983. Switch-reference in Lenakel. In Haiman, and Munro, (eds.), pp. 209–21.Google Scholar

McLendon, Sally. 1978. Ergativity, case and transitivity in Eastern Pomo. International Journal of American Linguistics 44: 1–113.Google Scholar

Marlett, Stephen A. 1984. Switch-reference and subject raising in Seri. In Cook, et al. (eds.), pp. 247–68.Google Scholar

Matthews, P. H. 2014. Oxford concise dictionary of linguistics, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Munro, Pamela (ed.). 1980. Studies of switch-reference. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar

Nash, David. 1980. Topics in Warlpiri grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Nichols, Lynn. 2000. Rethinking switch reference. In Carnie, et al. (eds.), pp. 5–18.Google Scholar

Nonato, Rafael. 2014. Clause chaining, switch reference and coordination. PhD, MIT.Google Scholar

Noonan, Michael. 1992. A grammar of Lango. Berlin and New York: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar

Olson, Michael. 1981. Barai clause junctures: Toward a functional theory of interclausal relations. PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar

Oswalt, Robert L. 1983. Interclausal reference in Kashaya. In Haiman, and Munro, (eds.), pp. 267–90.Google Scholar

Overall, Simon. 2014. Clause-chaining, switch-reference and nominalisations in Aguaruna (Jivaroan). In van Gijn, et al. (eds.), pp. 309–40.Google Scholar

Pavey, Emma L. 2010. The structure of language: An introduction to grammatical analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Payne, Thomas E. 1991. Medial clauses and interpropositional relations in Panare. Cognitive Linguistics 2/3: 247–82.Google Scholar

Phinnemore, Penny. 1988. Coordination in Ono. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 19(1/2): 97–123.Google Scholar

Popovich, Harold. 1986. The nominal reference system of Maxakalí. In Wiesemann, (ed.), pp. 351–8.Google Scholar

Reesink, Ger P. 1983. Switch-reference and topicality hierarchies. Studies in Language 7: 215–46.Google Scholar

Roberts, John R. 1987. Amele. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Roberts, John R. 1988a. Amele switch-reference and the theory of grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 19(1): 45–63.Google Scholar

Roberts, John R. 1988b. Switch-reference in Papuan languages: A syntactic or extra-syntactic device? Australian Journal of Linguistics 8: 75–118.Google Scholar

Roberts, John R. 1997. Switch-reference in Papua New Guinea: A preliminary survey. In Pawley, Andrew (ed.), Papers in Papuan linguistics, No. 3, pp. 101–241. (Pacific Linguistics, A-87). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Roberts, John R. 2001. Impersonal constructions in Amele. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., Dixon, R. M. W. and Onishi, Masayuki (eds.), Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects, pp. 201–50. (Typological Studies in Language 46). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Roberts, John R. 2012. Serial verbs in English: An RRG analysis of catenative verb constructions. Functions of Language 19(2): 201–34.Google Scholar

Roberts, John R. Forthcoming. Distributives in Amele: A role and reference grammar analysis. SIL Electronic Workpapers.Google Scholar

Roberts, John R. (ed.). 1990. Two grammatical studies. Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages, Vol. 37. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Rodrigues, Aryon. 1999. Macro-Jê. In Dixon, and Aikhenvald, (eds.), pp. 165–206.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm and Paol, J. N.. 1978. A Waskia grammar sketch and vocabulary. (Pacific Linguistics, B-56). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Dixon, (ed.), pp. 112–71.Google Scholar

Simpson, Jane and Bresnan, Joan. 1983. Control and obviation in Warlpiri. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 49–64.Google Scholar

Sousa, Hilário. 2006. What is switch-reference? From the viewpoint of young people’s switch-reference system in Menggwa Dla. Te Reo, Journal of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand 49: 39–72.Google Scholar

Sousa, Hilário. 2008. The development of echo-subject markers in Southern Vanuatu. Ms. Available online at: www.als.asn.au/proceedings/als2007/desousa.pdf.Google Scholar

Speece, Rick. 1985. Angave grammar. Ms. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Stirling, Lesley. 1993. Switch-reference and discourse representation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Trask, Robert L. 1993. A dictionary of grammatical terms in linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2008a. RPs and the nature of lexical and syntactic categories. In Van Valin, Jr. (ed.), pp. 161–78.Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. (ed.). 2008b. Investigations of the syntax–semantics–pragmatics interface. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. and LaPolla, Randy J.. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Verschueren, Jef (ed.). 1991. Levels of linguistic adaptation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Voort, Hein. 2004. A grammar of Kwazá. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Watkins, Laurel. 1993. The discourse function of Kiowa switch-reference. International Journal of American Linguistics 59: 137–64.Google Scholar

Webb, Ross and Webb, Lyndal. 1988. Irumu grammar essentials. Ms. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Weber, David. 1980. Switch-reference in Quechua. In Munro, (ed.), pp. 48–64.Google Scholar

Wells, Margaret. 1979. Siroi grammar. (Pacific Linguistics, B-51). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Wetzels, Leo (ed.). 2007. Language endangerment and endangered Languages. Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar

Wiesemann, Ursula. 1982. Switch-reference in Bantu languages. Journal of West African Languages 12: 42–57.Google Scholar

Wiesemann, Ursula. 1986a. Grammatical coreference. In Wiesemann, (ed.), pp. 437–64.Google Scholar

Wiesemann, Ursula. (ed.). 1986b. Pronominal systems. Tübingen: Gunther Narr.Google Scholar

Wilson, Darryl. 1969. Suena grammar highlights. In Capell, A. et al. (eds.), Papers in New Guinea Linguistics No. 9, pp. 95–110. (Pacific Linguistics, A-18). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Woodbury, Anthony C. 1983. Switch-reference, syntactic organization, and rhetorical structure in Central Yup’ik Eskimo. In Haiman, and Munro, (eds.), pp. 291–315.Google Scholar

Ameka, F. K. and Essegbey, J.. 2013. Serialising languages: Satellite-framed, verb-framed or neither. Ghana Journal of Linguistics 2: 19–38.Google Scholar

Anderson, John M. 1973. An essay concerning aspect: Some considerations of a general character arising from the Abbe Darrigol’s analysis of the Basque verb. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Beavers, John, Levin, Beth and Tham, Shiao Wei. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46: 331–77.Google Scholar

Berman, R. A. and Slobin, D. I.. 1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Blomberg, Johan. 2014. Motion in language and experience: Actual and non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai. Lund: Travaux de l’Institut de linguistique de Lund 53.Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2003. The unique vector constraint: The impact of direction changes on the linguistic segmentation of motion events. In van der Zee, E. and Slack, J. (eds.), Representing direction in language and space, pp. 86–110. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2010. The language-specificity of conceptual structure: Path, fictive motion, and time relations. In. Wolff, B. M. P. (ed.), Words and the mind: How words capture human experience, pp. 111–37. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, J. and Caelen, M.. 2001. The ECOM clips: A stimulus for the linguistic coding of event complexity. In Levinson, S. C. and Enfield, N. J. (eds.), Manual for the field season 2001, pp. 169–76. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Eisenbeiss, Sonja and Narasimhan, Bhuvana. 2006. Ways to go: Methodological considerations in Whorfian studies on motion events. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 50: 1–20.Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Enfield, Nicholas J., Essegbey, James, Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide, Kita, Sotaro, Lüpke, Friederike and Ameka, Felix K.. 2007. Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language 83: 1–38.Google Scholar

Brandt, Line. 2009. Subjectivity in the act of representing: The case for subjective motion and change. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8: 573–601.Google Scholar

Cacciari, C., Bolognini, N., Senna, I., Pellicciari, M. C., Miniussi, C. and Papagno, C.. 2011. Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study. Brain and Language 119: 149–57.Google Scholar

Carroll, Mary. 2000. Representing path in language production in English and German. In Habel, C. and von Stutterheim, C. (eds.), Räumlich Konzepte und sprachlich Strukturen, pp. 97–118. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Chen, Jidong. 2012. ‘She from bookshelf take-descend-come the box’: Encoding and categorizing placement events in Mandarin. In Kopecka, and Narasimhan, (eds.), pp. 37–54.Google Scholar

Coulson, Seana and Oakley, Todd. 2005. Blending and coded meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantics. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1510–36.Google Scholar

Croft, William, Willem, Hollmann, Barddal, Johanna and Taoka, Chiaki. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Boas, H. (ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar, pp. 201–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1989. Klamath stem structure in genetic and areal perspective. Paper presented at the Papers from the 1988 Hokan-Penutian languages workshop, University of Oregon.Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 2000. Argument structure of Klamath bipartite stems. In Simpson, A. (ed.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special session: Syntax and semantics of the indigenous languages of the Americas, pp. 15–25. Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 2009. Bipartite verbs in languages of western North America. In Filchenko, A. and Potanina, O. (eds.), Space and time in languages of various typology: Proceedings for the 25th International Conference ‘Dulson Readings’, Tomsk, 26–29 June 2008. Tomsk State Pedagogical University.Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in language and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Feist, Michele I. 2010. Motion through syntactic frames. Cognition 115: 192–6.Google Scholar

Fortis, Jean-Michel and Vittrant, Alice. 2011. L’organisation syntaxique de l’expression de la trajectoire: vers une typologie des constructions. Faits de langues 3: 71–98.Google Scholar

Gaby, Alice. 2012. The Thaayorre lexicon of putting and taking. In Kopecka, and Narasimhan, (eds.), pp. 233–52.Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, Peter. 2000. Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gennari, Silvia P., Sloman, Steven A., Malt, Barbara C. and Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2002. Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition 83: 49–79.Google Scholar

Goddard, Cliff. 1997. The semantics of coming and going. Pragmatics 7: 147–62.Google Scholar

Goschler, Juliana and Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2013. Beyond typology: The encoding of motion events across time and varieties. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Grinevald, Colette. 2011. On constructing a working typology of the expression of path. Faits de langues 3: 43–70.Google Scholar

Ibarretxe Antuñano, Iraide 2009. Path salience in motion events. In Jiansheng Guo, E. L., Budwig, Nancy, Ervin-Tripp, Susan, Nakamura, Kei and Őzçalişkan, Seyda (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, pp. 403–14. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Imbert, Caroline, Grinevald, Colette and Sörés, Anna. 2011. Pour une catégorie de satellite de Trajectoire dans une approche fonctionnelle-typologique. Faits de langues 3: 99–116.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1991. Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41: 9–45.Google Scholar

Kopecka, Anetta. 2013. Describing motion events in Old and Modern French. In Goschler, J. and Stefanowitsch, A. (eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events, pp. 163–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kopecka, Anetta and Narasimhan, Bhuvana (eds.). 2012. Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. and Wilkins, David (eds.). 2006. Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Loucks, Jeff and Pederson, Eric. 2011. Linguistic and non-linguistic categorization of complex motion events. In Bohnemeyer, J. and Pederson, E. (eds.), Event representation in language, pp, 108–33. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Matlock, Teenie. 2010. Abstract motion is no longer abstract. Language and Cognition 2: 243–60.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Yo. 1996. Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 7: 183–226.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Yo. 2003. Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In Chiba, Shuji et al. (eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A festschrift for Masaru Kajita, pp. 403–18. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Yo, Slobin, Dan I. and Akita, Kimi. 2012. A bibliography of linguistic expressions for motion events. Available online at: www.lit.kobe-u.ac.jp/~yomatsum/motionbiblio.html [Accessed May 2015].Google Scholar

Mayer, Mercer. 1969. Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar

Narasimhan, Bhuvana, Kopecka, Anetta, Bowerman, Melissa, Gullberg, Marianne and Majid, Asifa. 2012. Putting and taking events: A crosslinguistic perspective. In Kopecka, and Narasimhan, (eds.), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

O’Connor, Loretta. 2012. Take it up, down, and away: Encoding placement and removal in Lowland Chontal. In Kopecka, and Narasimhan, (eds.), pp. 297–326.Google Scholar

Oh, Kyung-Ju. 2009. Motion events in English and Korean fictional writings and translations. In Jiansheng Guo, E. L., Budwig, Nancy, Ervin-Tripp, Susan, Nakamura, Kei, Őzçalişkan, Seyda (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, pp. 253–62. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Özçalışkan, Şeyda and Slobin, Dan I.. 2003. Codability effects on the expression of manner of motion in Turkish and English. In Özsoy, A. S., Akar, D., Nakipoğlu-Demiralp, M., Erguvanlı-Taylan, E. and Aksu-Koç, A. (eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics, pp. 259–70. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.Google Scholar

Özyürek, Asli, Kita, Sotaro, Allen, Shanley, Brown, Amanda, Furman, Reyhan and Ishizuka, Tomoko. 2008. Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology 44: 1040–54.Google Scholar

Papahagi, Cristiana. 2011. Pour une typologie des systèmes d’adnominaux de la trajectoire. Faits de langues 3: 117–30.Google Scholar

Pederson, Eric. 2006. Tamil spatial language. In Levinson, S. and Wilkins, D. (eds.), The grammars of space, pp. 400–36. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Petersen, Jan Heegåard. 2012. How to put and take in Kalasha. In Kopecka, and Narasimhan, (eds.), pp. 349–66.Google Scholar

Piñón, Christopher J. 1993. Paths and their names. In Beals, Katharine, Cook, Gina, Kathman, David, Kita, Sotaro, Sotaro, , McCullough, Karl-Erik and Testen, David (eds.), Papers from the 29th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 287–303. Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

Pourcel, Stèphanie. 2005. Relativism in the linguistic representation and cognitive conceptualisation of motion events across verb-framed and satellite-framed languages. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Durham.Google Scholar

Pourcel, Stèphanie. 2010. Motion: A conceptual typology. In Evans, V. and Chilton, P. A. (eds.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions, pp. 419–50. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

Rapold, Christian J. 2012. The encoding of placement and removal events in ǂAkhoe Haiǁom. In Kopecka, and Narasimhan, (eds.), pp. 79–98.Google Scholar

Sampaio, Wany, Sinha, Chris and Sinha, Vera Da Silva. 2009. Mixing and mapping: Motion, path, and manner in Amondawa. In Jiansheng Guo, E. L., Budwig, Nancy, Ervin-Tripp, Susan, Nakamura, Kei, Őzçalişkan, Seyda (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, pp. 427–39. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Saygin, Ayse Pinar, McCullough, Stephen, Alac, Morana and Emmorey, Karen. 2010. Modulation of BOLD response in motion-sensitive lateral temporal cortex by real and fictive motion sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22: 2480–90.Google Scholar

Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2000. Simple and complex verbs in Jaminjung: A study of event categorization in an Australian language. Nijmegen: Katholieke UniversiteitGoogle Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Strömqvist, S. and Verhoeven, L. (eds.), Relating events in narrative, Vol. II: Typological and contextual perspectives, pp. 219–57. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan I. 2005. Relating narrative events in translation. In Shyldkrot, D. R. H. B. (ed.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman, pp. 115–29. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 1976. Semantic causative types. In Shibatani, M. (ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. VI: The grammar of causative constructions, pp. 43–115. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical form. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, pp. 57–149. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 1978. Figure and ground in complex sentences. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of human language, pp. 625–49. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12: 49–100.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 1996. Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’. In Bloom, P., Peterson, M. A., Nadel, L. and Garrett, M. F. (eds.), Language and space, pp. 211–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 2007. Lexical typologies. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, pp. 66–168. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 2009. Main verb properties and equipollent framing. In Guo, J., Lieven, E., Budwig, N., Ervin-Tripp, S., Nakamura, K. and Özçalışkan, Ş. (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, pp. 389–402. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Timyam, Napasri and Bergen, B. K.. 2010. A contrastive study of the caused-motion and ditransitive constructions in English and Thai: Semantic and pragmatic constraints. In Boas, Hans C. (ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar. pp. 137–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy Ithaca. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Verkerk, Annemarie. 2014. Diachronic change in Indo-European motion event encoding. Journal of Historical Linguistics 4: 40–83.Google Scholar

Verkuyl, Henk and Zwarts, Joost. 1992. Time and space in conceptual and logical semantics: the notion of path. Linguistics 30: 483–511.Google Scholar

Voorst, Jan. 1993. A Localist model for event semantics. Journal of Semantics 10: 65–111.Google Scholar

Wälchli, Bernhard. 2009. Motion events in parallel texts: A study in primary-data typology. Universität Bern Habilitationsschrift.Google Scholar

Wälchli, Bernhard and Sölling, Arnd. 2013. The encoding of motion events: Building typology bottom-up from text data in many languages. In Goschler, J. and Stefanowitsch, A. (eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events, pp. 77–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Warglien, Massimo, Gärdenfors, Peter and Westera, Matthijs. 2012. Event structure, conceptual spaces and the semantics of verbs. Theoretical Linguistics 38: 159–93.Google Scholar

Wilkins, David P. 2006. Towards an Arrente grammar of space. In Levinson, and Wilkins, (eds.), pp. 24–62.Google Scholar

Wilkins, David P. and Hill, Deborah. 1995. When ‘go’ means ‘come’: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 6: 209–59.Google Scholar

Wunderlich, Dieter. 1991. How do prepositional phrases fit into compositional syntax and semantics? Linguistics 29: 591–621.Google Scholar

Zlatev, Jordan, Blomberg, Johan and David, Caroline. 2010. Translocation, language and the categorization of experience. In Chilton, V. E. P. (ed.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions, pp. 389–418. London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar

Zwarts, Joost. 2003. Vectors across spatial domains: from place to size, orientation, shape and parts. In van der Zee, E. and Slack, J. (eds.), Representing direction in language and space, pp. 39–68. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zwarts, Joost. 2010. Forceful prepositions. In Chilton, V. E. P. (ed.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions, pp. 193–214. London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar

Zwarts, Joost. 2014. Directionele PP’s als predicaten (of niet). Nederlandse taalkunde 19(2): 255–75.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part II - Typology of Grammatical Categories

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Book contents

Part II - Typology of Grammatical Categories

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive