Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Diagrams
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: Linguistic Typology – Setting the Scene
- Part I Domains of Linguistic Typology
- Part II Typology of Grammatical Categories
- 11 The Typology of Morphological Processes: Form and Function
- 12 A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices
- 13 Negation
- 14 Number
- 15 A Typology of Frustrative Marking in Amazonian Languages
- 16 Logophoricity
- 17 A Typology of Switch Reference
- 18 Approaches to Motion Event Typology
- Part III Typological Profiles of Linguistic Areas and Language Families
- Index of Authors
- Index of Languages, Language Families and Linguistic Areas
- Index of Subjects
- References
15 - A Typology of Frustrative Marking in Amazonian Languages
from Part II - Typology of Grammatical Categories
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Diagrams
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: Linguistic Typology – Setting the Scene
- Part I Domains of Linguistic Typology
- Part II Typology of Grammatical Categories
- 11 The Typology of Morphological Processes: Form and Function
- 12 A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices
- 13 Negation
- 14 Number
- 15 A Typology of Frustrative Marking in Amazonian Languages
- 16 Logophoricity
- 17 A Typology of Switch Reference
- 18 Approaches to Motion Event Typology
- Part III Typological Profiles of Linguistic Areas and Language Families
- Index of Authors
- Index of Languages, Language Families and Linguistic Areas
- Index of Subjects
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology , pp. 477 - 512Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Adaskina, Y. V. 2005. Tipologicheskii analiz konstruktsii s frustrativnym znacheniem [Typological analysis of constructions with frustrative value]. Master’s thesis, Faculty of Philology, Moscow State University.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999. Arawak. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), The Amazonian languages, pp. 65–106. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. A grammar of Tariana, from Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandão, Ana Paula. 2010. Verb morphology in Pareci-Haliti (Arawak). Qualifying paper. University of Texas. Austin.Google Scholar
Brandão, Ana Paula. 2014. A reference grammar of Paresi-Haliti (Arawak). PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 2012. Typological characteristics of South American indigenous languages. In Campbell, Lyle and Grondona, Verónica (eds.), The indigenous languages of South America, pp. 259–330. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Carlin, Eithne B. 2004. A grammar of Trio: A Cariban language of Suriname. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Carlin, Eithne B. 2006. Feeling the Need: The borrowing of Cariban functional categories into Mawayana (Arawak). In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Grammars in contact, pp. 313–32. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chacon, Thiago. 2012. The phonology and morphology of Kubeo: The documentation, theory, and description of an Amazonian language. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai‘i, Manoa.Google Scholar
Corbera Mori, Angel. 1994. Fonología e gramática do Aguaruna (Jívaro). PhD dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
da Cruz, Aline. 2011. Fonologia e gramática do Nheengatú: A língua geral falada pelos povos Baré, Warekena e Baniwa. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1985. Hixkaryana and linguistic typology. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1987. Morphosyntactic areal characteristics of Amazonian languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 53(3): 311–26.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Wolf. 2006. La categoría del ‘frustrativo’ en las lenguas tupí-guaraníes. In Dietrick, W. and Symeonidis, H. (eds.), Guaraní y ‘Mawetí-Tupí-Guaraní’: Estudios históricos y descriptivos sobre una familia lingüística de América del Sur, pp. 71–85. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2004. The Jarawara language of southern Amazonia. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.. 1999. Introduction. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), The Amazonian languages, pp. 1–21. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.. (eds.). 1999. The Amazonian languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Epps, Patience and Salanova, Andrés P.. 2012. A linguística amazônica hoje. LIAMES 12: 7–37.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. 1986. Piraha. In Derbyshire, D. C. and Pullum, G. K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. I, pp. 200–325. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Facundes, Sidney Da Silva. 2000. The language of the Apurinã people of Brazil (Maipure/Arawak). PhD dissertation, SUNY Buffalo.Google Scholar
Facundes, Sidney Da Silva 2014. Negation in Apurinã (Arawak). In Michael, Lev and Granadillo, Tania (eds.), Negation in Arawak languages, pp. 121–46. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Faust, Norma and Loos, Eugene. 2002. Gramática del idioma Yaminahua. (Serie Lingüística Peruana 51). Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Galúcio, Ana Vilacy. 2001. The morphosyntax of Mekens (Tupi). PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Galúcio, Ana Vilacy. 2014. Discourse and epistemic modality in Mekens: The frustrative construction. Revista Linguística 10(2): 163–78.Google Scholar
Girón, Jesús Mario. 2008. Una gramática del Wã́nsöjöt (Puinave). PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Robert E. 1998. Wai Wai. In Derbyshire, D. C. and Pullum, G. K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. IV, pp. 25–224. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hanson, Rebecca. 2010. A grammar of Yine (Piro). PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.Google Scholar
Hyde, Sylvia. 1980. Diccionario Amahuaca. (Serie Lingüística Peruana 7). Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Jensen, Cheryl. 1998. Comparative Tupí-Guaraní morphosyntax. In Derbyshire, D. C. and Pullum, G. K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. IV, pp. 489–618. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kerr, Isabel J. 1995. Gramática pedagógica del cuiba-wámonae. Bogotá: Asociación Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania. 1998. On identifying an evasive gram: Action narrowly averted.Studies in Language 22(1): 113–60.Google Scholar
Larson, M. L. 1963. Emic classes which manifest the obligatory tagmemes in major independent clause types of Aguaruna (Jivaro). In Waterhouse, Viola G. (ed.), Studies in Peruvian Indian languages 1. pp. 1–36. (SIL Publications in Linguistics No. 9). Norman: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. 2004. Towards a semantic typology of adversative and contrast marking. Journal of Semantics 21: 177–98.Google Scholar
Martins, Silvana Andrade. 2004. Fonologia e gramática Dâw. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Michael, Lev D. 2008. Nanti evidential practice: Language, knowledge, and social action in an Amazonian society. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev D. 2009. The semantics of clause linking in Iquito. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), The semantics of clause-linking: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 145–66. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mihas, Elena. 2010. Essentials of Ashéninka Perené grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.Google Scholar
Miller, Marion. 1999. Desano grammar: Studies in the languages of Colombia 6. Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Montag, Susan. 1981. Diccionario Cashinahua: Tomo II. Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Morse, Nancy L. and Maxwell, Michael B.. 1999. Cubeo grammar. Studies in the Languages of Colombia 5. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Müller, Neele. 2013. Tense, aspect, modality, and evidentiality marking in South American indigenous languages. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Payne, David L. 1981. The phonology and morphology of Axininca Campa. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Payne, David L. 1990. Some widespread grammatical forms in South American languages. In Payne, Doris (ed.), Amazonian linguistics, pp. 75–87. Dallas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris. 2001. Review of The Amazonian languages (Dixon and Aikhenvald 1999). Language 77(3): 594–8.Google Scholar
Plungian, V. A. 2001. Antirezultativ: Do i posle rezul’tata [The antiresultative: Before and after the result.] In Plungian, V. A. (ed.), Glagol’nyye kategorii: Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki 1 [Verbal categories: Studies in grammatical theory 1], pp. 50–88. Moscow: Russkiye slovari.Google Scholar
Plungian, V. A. and van der Auwera, J.. 2006. Towards a typology of discontinuous past marking. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 59(4): 317–49.Google Scholar
Queixalós, Francisco. 1991. Entre Cantos y Llantos: Tradición oral sikuani. Bogotá: Publicaciones de Etnollano.Google Scholar
Galindo, Reinoso, Eduardo, Andrés. 2002. Elementos para una gramática de la lengua piapoco. (Colección Premios Nacionales de Cultura). Bogotá: Ministerio de Cultura.Google Scholar
Rose, Françoise. 2003. Morphosyntaxe de l’émérillon: Langue tupi-guarani de Guyane française. PhD dissertation, Lyon.Google Scholar
Saad, George M. 2014. A grammar sketch of Shuar: With a focus on the verb phrase. MA thesis, MPI Neijmegen.Google Scholar
Sakel, Jeanette. 2003. A grammar of Mosetén. PhD dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Scott, Marie. 2004. Vocabulario Sharanahua – Castellano. Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Sheldon, S. N. 1988. Os sufixos verbais Múra-Pirahã [Mura-Pirahã verbal suffixes], Vol. II, ed. Grimes, J. E. pp. 147–75. ((Série Lingüística 9). Brasília: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Silva, Cácio and Silva, Elisângela. 2012. A língua dos Yuhupdeh: Introdução etnolínguística, dicionário Yuhup-Português e glossário semântico-gramatical. São Gabriel da Cachoeira: Pró-Amazônia.Google Scholar
Snell, Betty. 1998. Pequeño Diccionario Machiguenga – Castellano. Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Sparing-Chávez, Margarethe. 2003. I want to but I can’t: The frustrative in Amahuaca. SIL Electronic Working Papers 2003–002. Available online at: www.sil.org/silewp/abstract.asp?ref=2003002.Google Scholar
Sparing-Chávez, Margarethe. 2012. Aspects of the Amahuaca grammar: An endangered language of the Amazon basin. SIL e-book 51. Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar
Strom, C. 1992. Retuarã syntax. Studies in the Languages of Colombia 3. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gerald. 2010. O ‘caduco’ e o ‘frustrativo’ nas Línguas Baniwa do Içana e Nheengatu (Alto Rio Negro, Brasil). In Carlin, E. and van de Kerke, S. (eds.), Linguistics and archaeology in the Americas, pp. 207–14. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Thiesen, Wesley. 1996. Gramática del idioma Bora. (Serie Lingüística Peruana 38). Pucallpa, Peru: Ministerio de Educación; Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Turner, Glen D. 1992. Una breve gramática del Shuar, ed. Levinsohn, Stephen H.. (Cuadernos Etnolingüísticos 19). Quito: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Pilar M. 2003. Transitivity in Shipibo-Konibo grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.Google Scholar
Van der Voort, Hein. 2004. A grammar of Kwaza. (Mouton Grammar Library 29). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Gijn, Rik. 2006. A grammar of Yurakaré. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Villafañe, Lucrecia. 2004. Gramática Yuki: Lengua Tupí-Guaraní de Bolivia. Ediciones del Rectorado, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Argentina.Google Scholar
Zariquiey, Roberto. 2011. A grammar of Kashibo-Kakataibo. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.Google Scholar