Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:00:24.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Typology and Grammaticalization

from Part I - Domains of Linguistic Typology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2017

By
Heiko Narrog
Edited by
Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald  and
R. M. W. Dixon
Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
Affiliation:
James Cook University, North Queensland
R. M. W. Dixon
Affiliation:
James Cook University, North Queensland
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology , pp. 151 - 177
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansaldo, Umberto and Lim, Lisa. 2004. Phonetic absence as syntactic prominence. Grammaticalization in isolating tonal languages. In Fischer, Olga, Norde, Muriel and Perridon, Harry (eds.), Up and down the Cline: The nature of grammaticalization, pp. 345–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Bhat, D. N. S. 1999. The prominence of tense, aspect and mood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 2004. Grammaticalization without coevolution of form and meaning: The case of tense-aspect-modality in East and mainland Southeast Asia. In Bisang, Walter, Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. and Wiemer, Björn (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, pp. 109–38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 2008. Grammaticalization and the areal factor: The perspective of East and mainland Southeast Asian languages. In Jóse López-Couso, Maria and Seoane, Elena (eds.), Rethinking grammaticalization: New perspectives, pp. 15–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 2010. Grammaticalization in Chinese: A construction-based account, in Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, pp. 245–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 2011. Grammaticalization and typology, in Narrog, Heiko and Heine, Bernd (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, pp. 105–17. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 1988. The diachronic dimension in explanation. In Hawkins, John (ed.), Explaining language universals, pp. 350–79. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2006. Language change and universals. In Mairal, Ricardo and Gil, Juana (eds.), Linguistic universals, pp. 179–94. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2009. Language universals and usage-based theory. In Christiansen, Morten H., Collins, Christopher and Edelman, Shimon (eds.), Language universals, pp. 17–39. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. and Thompson, Sandra. 1997. Three frequency effects in syntax. Proceedings of the Twenty-third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 378–88. Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Pagliuca, William and Perkins, Revere D.. 1990. On the asymmetries in the affixation of grammatical material. In Croft, William A., Kemmer, Suzanne and Denning, Keith (eds.), Studies in typology and diachrony: Papers presented to Joseph H. Greenberg on his 75th Birthday, pp. 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere D. and Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 2000. Florescence as a force in grammaticalization. In Gildea, Spike (ed.), Reconstructing grammar: Comparative linguistics and grammaticalization, pp. 39–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1980. Morphology and word order reconstruction: Problems and prospects. In Fisiak, Jaced (ed.), Historical morphology, pp. 83–96. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology, 2nd edn. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1993. Typology and reconstruction. In Jones, Charles (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, pp. 74–97. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2006. The asymmetry of affixation. In Gärtner, Hans-Martin, Beck, Sigrid, Eckardt, Regine, Musan, Renate and Stiebels, Barbara (eds.), Puzzles for Krifka, pp. 10–14. Available online at: www.zas.gwz-berlin.de/publications/40-60-puzzles-for-krifka/.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2001. Lexical categories. Lecture 2 of his Santa Barbara Lectures on Functional Syntax. The LSA Summer Institute, UC Santa Barbara. Available at: www.uoregon.edu/~delancey/sb/functional_syntax.doc.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 2005. Prefixing versus suffixing in inflectional morphology. In Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), The world atlas of linguistic structures, pp. 110–13. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1971. Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist’s field trip. Chicago Linguistics Society 7: 394–415.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2008. On the relational properties of passive clauses. In Fernández, Zarina Estrada, Wichmann, Søren, Chamoreau, Claudine and Álvarez González, Albert (eds.), Studies in voice and transitivity, pp. 19–32. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2009. The genesis of syntactic complexity: Diachrony, ontogeny, neuro-cognition, evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. H. 1961. Universals of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. H. 1995. The diachronic typological approach to language. In Shibatani, Masayoshi and Bynon, Theodora (eds.), Approaches to language typology, pp. 145–66. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken. 2001. Navajo verb stem position and the bipartite structure of the Navajo conjunct sector. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4): 678–93.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. and Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2008. Creating economical morphosyntactic patterns in language change. In Good, Jeff (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, pp. 185–214. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John. 2011. Processing efficiency and complexity in typological patterns. In Song, Jae Jung (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, pp. 206–26. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Cognitive foundations of grammar. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2003. Grammaticalization. In Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, pp. 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2004. On genetic motivation in grammar. In Radden, Günter and Panther, Klaus-Uwe (eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation, pp. 103–20. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania 2006. The changing languages of Europe. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2005. Gram, construction, and word class formation. In Knobloch, Clemens and Schaeder, Burhard (eds.), Wortarten und Grammatikalisierung. Perspektiven in System und Erwerb, pp. 79–92. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Traugott, and Heine, (eds.), Vol. I, pp. 17–35.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. and Traugott, Elizabeth C.. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred G. 2000. Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuryɬowicz, Jerzy. [1965] 1975. The evolution of grammatical categories. Esquisses linguistiques 2: 38–54. (Diogenes 1965: 55–71.)Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1986. Grammaticalization and linguistic typology. General Linguistics 26(1): 3–22.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. Thoughts on grammaticalization, 2nd revised edn. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität. pp.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 2010. Causes of language change. In Luraghi, Silvia and Bubenik, Vit (eds.), Continuum companion to historical linguistics, pp. 358–70. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej, Haspelmath, Martin and Comrie, Bernard (eds.). 2010. Studies in ditransitive constructions: A comparative handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2003. Why prefixes? Acta Linguistica Hungarica 50(1–2): 155–85.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2011. Grammaticalization and explanation. In Narrog, Heiko and Heine, Bernd (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, pp. 177–92. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2010. Voice and non-canonical case marking in the expression of event-oriented modality. Linguistic Typology 14: 71–126.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko and Ohori, Toshio. 2011. Grammaticalization in Japanese. In Narrog, Heiko and Heine, Bernd (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, pp. 775–85. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1880. Principien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. 1891. Principles of the history of language. Trans. of 2nd edn of the original by Strong, H. A.. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Rhee, Seongha. 2011. Grammaticalization in Korean. In Narrog, Heiko and Heine, Bernd (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, pp. 764–74. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 2000. Morpheme order and semantic scope: Word formation in the Athapaskan verb. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian and Roussou, Anna. 1999. A formal approach to ‘grammaticalization’. Linguistics 37(6): 1011–41.Google Scholar
Schiering, René. 2007. The phonological basis of linguistic rhythm: Cross-linguistic data and diachronic interpretation. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60(4): 337–59.Google Scholar
Schiering, René. 2010. Reconsidering erosion in grammaticalization: Evidence from cliticization. In Stathi, Katerina, Gehweiler, Elke and König, Ekkehard (eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues, pp. 73–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Shields, Kenneth. 2011. Linguistic typology and historical linguistics. In Song, Jae Jung (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, pp. 551–67. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thornes, Tim. 2013. Causation as ‘functional sink’ in Northern Paiute. In Thornes, Timothy J., Andvik, Erik E., Hyslop, Gwendolyn and Jansen, Joana (eds.), Functional-historical approaches to explanation: In honor of Scott DeLancey, pp. 237–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Trask, Robert L. and Stockwell, Peter. 2007. Language and linguistics: Key concepts, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2010. Grammaticalization. In Luraghi, Silvia and Bubenik, Vit (eds.), Continuum companion of historical linguistics, pp. 271–85. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Heine, Bernd (eds.). 1991. Approaches to grammaticalization, 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2004. Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka. 2012. An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Whaley, Lindsay. 1997. Introduction to typology: The unity and diversity of language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Young, Robert. 2000. The Navajo verb system: An overview. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Young, Robert and Morgan, William. 1987. The Navajo language: A grammar and colloquial dictionary, 2nd edn. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×