Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Diagrams
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: Linguistic Typology – Setting the Scene
- Part I Domains of Linguistic Typology
- 2 Phonological Typology
- 3 Morphological Typology
- 4 Typology and Historical Linguistics
- 5 Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Structure and Linguistic Complexity
- 6 Typology and Grammaticalization
- 7 Sign Language Typology
- 8 Typology of Mixed Languages
- 9 Typology of Creole Languages
- 10 Typology of Secret Languages and Linguistic Taboos
- Part II Typology of Grammatical Categories
- Part III Typological Profiles of Linguistic Areas and Language Families
- Index of Authors
- Index of Languages, Language Families and Linguistic Areas
- Index of Subjects
- References
5 - Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Structure and Linguistic Complexity
from Part I - Domains of Linguistic Typology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Diagrams
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: Linguistic Typology – Setting the Scene
- Part I Domains of Linguistic Typology
- 2 Phonological Typology
- 3 Morphological Typology
- 4 Typology and Historical Linguistics
- 5 Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Structure and Linguistic Complexity
- 6 Typology and Grammaticalization
- 7 Sign Language Typology
- 8 Typology of Mixed Languages
- 9 Typology of Creole Languages
- 10 Typology of Secret Languages and Linguistic Taboos
- Part II Typology of Grammatical Categories
- Part III Typological Profiles of Linguistic Areas and Language Families
- Index of Authors
- Index of Languages, Language Families and Linguistic Areas
- Index of Subjects
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology , pp. 124 - 150Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2003. A grammar of Tariana, from Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2007. Typological distinctions in word-formation. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd edn, pp. 1–65. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 1988. Center and periphery: adoption, diffusion, and spread. In Fisiak, J. (ed.), Historical dialectology: Regional and social, pp. 39–84. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1985. Inflectional morphology. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic fieldwork, Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, pp. 150–201. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1997. On the linguistic prehistory of Finno-Ugric. In Hickey, R. and Puppel, S. (eds.), Language history and linguistic modelling: A festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th birthday, pp. 829–62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2010. The evolution of morphology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Charney, Jean Ormsbee. 1993. A grammar of Comanche. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1980. Morphology and word order reconstruction: Problems and prospects. In Fisiak, J. (ed.), Historical morphology, pp. 83–96. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1992. Before complexity. In Hawkins, J. and Gell-Mann, M. (eds.), The evolution of human languages, pp. 193–211. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1991. Chronological strata of suffix classes in the Klamath verb. International Journal of American Linguistics 57: 426–45.Google Scholar
De Vogelaer, Gunther. 2004. Person marking in Dutch dialects. In Kortmann, B. (ed.), Dialectology meets typology: Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective, pp. 181–210. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
De Vogelaer, Gunther. 2005. Persoonsmarkering in de dialecten in het nederlandse taalgebied. Ghent University Press.Google Scholar
De Vogelaer, Gunther. 2009. Changing pronominal gender in Dutch; transmission or diffusion? In Tsipaklou, S., Karyolemou, M. and Pavlou, P. (eds.), Language variation: European perspectives II, pp. 71–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
De Vogelaer, Gunther and van der Auwera, Johan. 2010. When typological rara generate rarissima: Analogical extension of verbal agreement in Dutch dialects. In Wohlgemuth, J. and Cysouw, M. (eds.), Rara and rarissima: Documenting the fringes of linguistic diversity, pp. 47–72. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Bruce. 1994. Afrikaans. In König, E. and Van der Auwera, J. (eds.), The Germanic languages, pp. 478–504. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Drinka, Bridget. 2003. The development of the perfect in Indo-European: stratigraphic evidence of prehistoric areal influence. In Andersen, H. (ed.), Language contacts in prehistory: Studies in stratigraphy, pp. 77–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubé, Jaïmé. 2013. Reconsidering the ‘isolating protolanguage hypothesis’ in the evolution of morphology. In Cathcart, C., Chen, I.-H., Finley, G., Kang, S., Sandy, C. and Stickles, E. (eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 76–90. Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas and Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 2002. Introduction: Problems of polysynthesis. In Evans, N. and Sasse, H.-J. (eds.), Problems of polysynthesis, pp. 1–13. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 2002. Syntactic development from Old Nordic to Early Modern Nordic. In Bandle, O. et al. (eds.), The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages, Vol. II, pp. 1149–61. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, Gordon. 1977. Case inflections in Indo-European. Journal of Indo-European Studies 5: 1–31.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael. 1992. Morphophonemic complexity and typological stability in a polysynthetic language family. International Journal of American Linguistics 58: 242–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortescue, Michael. 2002. The rise and fall of polysynthesis in the Eskimo-Aleut family. In Evans, N. and Sasse, H.-J. (eds.), Problems of polysynthesis, pp. 282–97. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Fortson, Benjamin. 2010. Indo-European language and culture: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gabelentz, Georg. 1901. Die Sprachwissenschaft: ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse, 2nd edn. Leipzig: Weigel.Google Scholar
Geerts, Guido. 1966. Genus en geslacht in de Gouden Eeuw. Brussels: Belgisch Interuniversitair Centrum voor Neerlandistiek.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy and Young, Philip. 2002. Cooperation and interpersonal manipulation in the society of intimates. In Chibatani, M. (ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation, pp. 23–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grace, George. 1990. The ‘aberrant’ (vs. ‘exemplary’) Melanesian languages. In Baldi, P. (ed.), Linguistic change and reconstruction methodology, pp. 155–73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoijer, Harry. 1945. Classificatory verb stems in the Apachean languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 11: 13–23.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1974. Speech and language: on the origins and foundations of inequality among speakers. In Bloomfield, M. and Haugen, E. (eds.), Language as a human problem, pp. 45–71. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1929. Remarques sur l’évolution phonologique du Russe comparée à celle des autres langues Slaves. Prague: Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 2.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language: Its nature, development and origin. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Keenan, Ed. 1976. Discussion. In Harnard, S. R., Steklis, H. D. and Lancaster, J. (eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech, pp. 92–6. New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Korotkova, Natalia and Lander, Yury. 2010. Deriving affix ordering in polysynthesis: evidence from Adyghe. Morphology 20: 299–319.Google Scholar
Kusters, Wouter. 2003. Linguistic complexity: The influence of social change on verbal inflection. Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred. 1993. Theoretical bases of Indo-European linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lupyan, Gary and Dale, Rick. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE 5(1): e8559. Published online. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008559.Google Scholar
McDonough, Joyce and Sussman, Rachel. 2006. A methodology for the investigation of speaker’s knowledge of structure in Athabaskan. Proceedings of Berkeley Linguistic Society 30: 102–13.Google Scholar
Mailhammer, Robert. 2011. The prehistory of European languages. In Kortmann, B. and van der Auwera, J. (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe: A comprehensive guide, pp. 671–82. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Melchert, Craig. Forthcoming. The position of Anatolian. In Weiss, M. and Garrett, A. (eds.), Handbook of Indo-European studies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Melchert, Craig and Oettinger, Norbert. 2009. Ablativ und Instrumental im Hethitischen und Indogermanischen: ein Beitrag zur relativen Chronologie. Incontri Linguistici 32: 53–73.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of native North America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1977. Pidginisation and simplification of language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Nettle, Daniel and Romaine, Suzanne. 2000. Vanishing voices: The extinction of the world’s languages. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 2007. Review of Ö. Dahl: The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Diachronica 24(1): 171–8.Google Scholar
Perkins, Revere. 1980. The covariation of culture and grammar. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Poulson, Laurie. 2011. Meta-modeling of tense and aspect in a cross-linguistic grammar engineering platform. University of Washington Working Papers in Linguistics 28.Google Scholar
de Reuse, Willem. 2006. A practical grammar of the San Carlos Apache language. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 1999. Review of Leonard Faltz (1998): The Navajo verb: a grammar for students and scholars. Linguistic Typology 3: 393–400.Google Scholar
Roberge, Paul. 1995. The formation of Afrikaans. In Mesthrie, R. (ed.), Language and social history: Studies in South African sociolinguistics, pp. 68–88. Cape Town: Philip.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 1997. Social networks and kinds of speech community events. In Blench, R. and Spriggs, M. (eds.), Archaeology and language, pp. 209–61. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ryckeboer, Hugo. 2002. Dutch/Flemish in the north of France. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 23: 22–35.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm. 1846. Œuvres de M. Auguste-Guillaume de Schlegel. Leipzig: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Shields, Kenneth. 2010. Linguistic typology and the reconstruction of the Indo-European accusative plural. Emerita: Revista de Lingüística y Filología Clásica 78: 33–42.Google Scholar
Sinnemäki, Kaius 2009. Complexity in core argument marking and population size. In Sampson, G., Gil, D. and Trudgill, P. (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, pp. 125–40. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smitherman, Thomas and Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2009. Typological changes in the evolution of IndoEuropean syntax? Diachronica 26(2): 253–73.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald. 1996. Introduction to Indo-European linguistics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thurston, William. 1989. How exoteric languages build a lexicon: Esoterogeny in West New Britain. In Harlow, R. and Hooper, R. (eds.), VICAL I: Papers in Oceanic linguistics, pp. 555–79. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1983. On dialect: Social and geographical perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter 2013. Gender maintenance and loss in Totenmålet, English, and other major Germanic varieties. In Lohndal, T. (ed.), In search of Universal Grammar: From Old Norse to Zoque, pp. 77–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter 2016. Sociolinguistic typology and the uniformitarian hypothesis. In Crevels, M., Hombert, J.-M. and Muysken, P. (eds.), Language dispersal, diversification, and contact: A global perspective. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vogt, Hans. 1948. Dans quelles conditions et dans quelles limites peut s’exercer sur le système morphologique d’une langue l’action du système morphologique d’une autre langue? In Lejeune, M. (ed.), Actes du Sixième Congrès International des Linguistes, pp. 31–45. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Weiss, Helmut. Forthcoming. The Wackernagel position and complementizer agreement: The emergence of a syntactic particularity at the left edge of the middle field. In Hinterhölzl, R., Bentzen, K., Speyer, A. and Szucsuch, L. (eds.), The German Middle Field in a comparative and diachronic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956. Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, ed. Carroll, John B.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wier, Thomas. 2006. Review of J. Sadock: A Grammar of Kalaallisut. Language 82: 221–2.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison and Grace, George. 2007. The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua 117: 543–78.Google Scholar