Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Diagrams
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: Linguistic Typology – Setting the Scene
- Part I Domains of Linguistic Typology
- Part II Typology of Grammatical Categories
- 11 The Typology of Morphological Processes: Form and Function
- 12 A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices
- 13 Negation
- 14 Number
- 15 A Typology of Frustrative Marking in Amazonian Languages
- 16 Logophoricity
- 17 A Typology of Switch Reference
- 18 Approaches to Motion Event Typology
- Part III Typological Profiles of Linguistic Areas and Language Families
- Index of Authors
- Index of Languages, Language Families and Linguistic Areas
- Index of Subjects
- References
14 - Number
from Part II - Typology of Grammatical Categories
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Diagrams
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: Linguistic Typology – Setting the Scene
- Part I Domains of Linguistic Typology
- Part II Typology of Grammatical Categories
- 11 The Typology of Morphological Processes: Form and Function
- 12 A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices
- 13 Negation
- 14 Number
- 15 A Typology of Frustrative Marking in Amazonian Languages
- 16 Logophoricity
- 17 A Typology of Switch Reference
- 18 Approaches to Motion Event Typology
- Part III Typological Profiles of Linguistic Areas and Language Families
- Index of Authors
- Index of Languages, Language Families and Linguistic Areas
- Index of Subjects
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology , pp. 440 - 476Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Abdoulaye, Mahamane L. 2004. Comitative, coordinating, and inclusory constructions in Hausa. In Haspelmath, Martin (ed.), Coordinating constructions, pp. 165–93. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2008. Lexical plurals: A morphosemantic approach. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2008. The Manambu language of East Sepik, Papua New Guinea. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W.. 2011. Non-ergative associations between S and O. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Language at large: Essays on syntax and semantics, pp. 143–69. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon, Jelinek, Eloise, Kratzer, Angelika and Partee, Barbara H. (eds.). 1995. Quantification in natural languages, Vol. I. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Baermen, Matthews and Brown, Dunstan. 2005. Syncretism in verbal person/number marking. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 122–5.Google Scholar
Bakker, Dik and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.). 2013. Languages across boundaries. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2010. Ad hoc categories. In Hogan, Patrick Holm (ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of language sciences, pp. 86–7. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bhat, D. N. S. 2004b. Conjunction and personal pronouns. In Haspelmath, (ed.), pp. 89–105.Google Scholar
Biermann, Anna. 1982. Die grammatische Kategorie Numerus. In Seiler, Hnsjakob and Lehmann, Christian (eds.), Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen, Teil I: Bereich und Ordnung der Phänomene, pp. 229–43. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cable, Seth. 2014. Distributive numerals and distance distributivity (and beyond). Language 90(3): 562–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpio, María Belén. 2014. ‘Restricted group’ and ‘group’ within the pronominal system of Western Toba (Guaicuruan, Argentina). Studies in Language 38(4): 982–94.Google Scholar
Chan, Eugene (compiler). 2009. Numeral systems of the world’s languages. Available online at: http://lingweb.eva.mpg.de/numeral.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Blackwell; 2nd edn, 1989.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1997. Some problems in the theory and typology of numeral systems. In Palek, B. (ed.), Proceedings of LP’96: Typology – prototypes, item orderings, and universals. Proceedings of the conference held in Prague August 20–22, 1996, pp. 41–56. Prague: Charles University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 2004. The search for the perfect numeral system, with particular reference to Southeast Asia. Linguistik Indonesia 22, 137–45.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2005. Suppletion in personal pronouns: Theory versus practice, and the place of reproducibility in typology. Linguistic Typology, 9(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. and Mithun, Marianne. 1996. Associative forms in the typology of number systems: evidence from Yup’ik. Journal of Linguistics 31: 1–17.Google Scholar
Corstius, H. Brandt (ed.). 1968. Grammars for number words. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2013. The referential hierarchy: Reviewing the evidence in diachronic perspective. In Bakker, et al. (eds.), pp. 69–93.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2014. Competing motivations models and diachrony: What evidence for what motivations? In MacWhinney, et al. (eds.), pp. 282–98.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A. 1999. Number and number systems. In Brown, Keith and Miller, Jim (eds.), Concise encyclopedia of grammatical categories, pp. 267–71. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2003. The paradigmatic structure of person marking. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2005a. A typology of honorific uses of clusivity. In Filimonova, (ed.), pp. 213–30.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2005b. Inclusive/exclusive forms of ‘we’. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 162–9.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2011. The expression of person and number: A typologist’s perspective. Morphology 21: 419–43.Google Scholar
Daniel, Michael. 2000. Tipologija associativnoj mnozhestvennosti [The typology of associative plurals]. Doctoral dissertation, Moscow University.Google Scholar
Daniel, Michael. 2005a. Plurality in independent personal pronouns. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 146–9.Google Scholar
Daniel, Michael and Moravcsik, Edith. 2005. Associative plurals. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 150–3.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1985. Hixkaryana and linguistic typology. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
De Rijk, Rudolf P. G. 2008. Standard Basque: A progressive grammar, Vol. I: The grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Downing, Pamela. 1996. Numeral classifier systems: The case of Japanese. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang. 1968. Studien zur verbalen Pluralität, Iterativum, Distributivum, Durativum, Intensivum in der allgemeinen Grammatik, im Lateinischen und Hethitischen. Graz and Wien: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2005. Coding of nominal plurality. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 138–41.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2006. Dyad constructions. In Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, pp. 24–8. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. 1986. Pirahã. In Derbyshire, Desmond C. and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. I, pp. 200–325. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Filimonova, Elena. 2005a. Clusivity cross-linguistically: Common trends and possible patterns. In Filimonova, (ed.), pp. 399–424.Google Scholar
Filimonova, Elena (ed.). 2005b. Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive-exclusive distinction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forchheimer, Paul. 1953. The category of person in language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1997. Grammaticalization of number: From demonstratives to nominal and verbal plural. Linguistic Typology 1: 193–242.Google Scholar
Francis, Elaine J. and Yuasa, Etsuyo. 2008. A multi-modular approach to gradual change in grammaticalization. Journal of Linguistics 44: 45–86.Google Scholar
Ghaniabadi, Saffed. 2012. Plural marking beyond count nouns. In Massam, (ed.), pp. 112–28.Google Scholar
Ghomeshi, Jila and Massam, Diane. 2012. The count mass distinction: issues and perspectives. In Massam, (ed.), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Gil, David. 1988. Georgian reduplication and the domain of distributivity. Linguistics 26(6): 1039–65.Google Scholar
Gil, David. 1995. Universal quantifiers and distributivity. In Bach, et al. (eds.), pp. 321–62.Google Scholar
Gil, David. 1996. Maltese ‘collective nouns’: A typological perspective. Rivista di Linguistica 8(1): 53–87.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff and Wierzbicka, Anna. 2014. Semantic fieldwork and lexical universals. Studies in Language 38(1): 80–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of language, pp. 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1972. Numeral classifiers and substantival number: problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. Working Papers on Language Universals 9: 1–39. Reprinted in Denning, Keith and Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, pp. 194–206. Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. Generalizations about numeral systems. In Greenberg, (ed.), Universals of human language, Vol. III: Word structure, pp. 249–95. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 2005. Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grimm, Scott. 2012. Individuation and inverse number marking in Dagaare. In Massam, (ed.), pp. 75–98.Google Scholar
Harbour, Daniel. 2014. Paucity, abundance, and the theory of number. Language 90(1): 185–229.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. Diachronic sources of ‘all’ and ‘every’. In Bach, et al. (eds.), pp. 363–82.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. Coordinating constructions. An overview. In Haspelmath, (ed.), Coordinating constructions, pp. 3–39. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2005. Occurrence of nominal plurality. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 142–5.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Coordination. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. II: Complex constructions, pp. 1–51. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2013. Argument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. In Bakker, et al. (eds.), pp. 197–226.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin and Karjus, Andres. 2015. Explaining asymmetries in number marking: Singulatives, plurative, and usage frequency. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David and Comrie, Bernard (eds.). 2005. The world atlas of language structures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Head, Brian F. 1978. Respect degrees in pronominal reference. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Vol. III: Word structure, pp. 151–211. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World lexicon or grammaticalization. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Helmbrecht, Johannes. 2004. Ikonizität in Personalpronomina. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 23: 211–44.Google Scholar
Helmbrecht, Johannes. 2014, Politeness distinctions in pronouns: A case study in competing motivations. In MacWhinney, et al. (eds.), pp. 315–32.Google Scholar
Honti, László. 1999. The numeral system of the Uralic languages. In Gvozdanovič, Jadranka (ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide, pp. 243–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hume, David. [1739–40] 1978. A treatise of human nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Originally published London: John Noon.Google Scholar
Hurford, James R. 1975. The linguistic theory of numerals. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hurford, James R. 1987. Language and number: The emergence of a cognitive system. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Inoue, Kyoko. 2000. Visualizing ability and nominal classification: Evidence of cultural operation in the agreement rules of Japanese numeral classifiers. In Senft, (ed.), pp. 217–69.Google Scholar
Iturrioz Leza, J. L. and Skopeteas, S. 2004. Numerus. In Booij, Geert E., Lehmann, Christian and Mugdan, Joachim (eds.), Morphologie: Ein internationals Handbuch zur Rexion und Wortbilding, Vol. II, pp. 1053–66. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jensen, Hans. 1952. Die sprachliche Kategorie des Numerus. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Universität Rostock, Gesellschafts- und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe 1(2): 1–21.Google Scholar
Kapeliuk, Olga. 1989. Appurtenance as a linguistic concept. Folia Linguistica 23(3/4): 341–52.Google Scholar
Landman, Fred. 2000. Events and pluralities: The Jerusalem lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2009. Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Universal and typological aspects of agreement. In Seiler, Hansjakob and Stachowiak, Franz Josesf (eds.), Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen. Teil II: Die Techniken und ihr Zusammenhang in Einzelsprachen, pp. 201–67. Tübingen; Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich and Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Li, XuPing. 2013. Numeral classifiers in Chinese: The syntax–semantics interface. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 2000. Inclusory pronominals. Oceanic Linguistics 39(1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, Godehard. 1991. Quantity and number. In Zaefferer, Dietmar (ed.), Semantic universals and universal semantics, pp. 133–49. Berlin: Foris.Google Scholar
Lipczuk, Ryszard. 1980. The Stellung der Zahlwörter im Rahmen der Wortarten. Darmstadt: Kümmerle.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1992. Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian, Malchukov, Andrej and Moravcsik, Edith (eds.). 2014. Competing motivations in grammar and usage. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Markmann, Ellen M. 1989. Categorization and naming in children: Problems of induction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martinez Areta, M. 2009. The category of number in Basque: I. Synchronic and historical aspects. Fontes Linguae Vasconum; Studia e Documenta 110: 63–98.Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina. 2014. What do connectives and plurals have in common? The linguistic expression of ad hoc categories. In Blochowiak, Joanna, Durrlemann-Tame, Stéphanie, Grisot, Cristina and Laenzlinger, Christopher C. (eds.), Linguistic papers dedicated to Jacques Moeschler, pp. 1–21. (University of Geneva Publication). Available online at: www.unige.ch/lettres/linguistique/moeschler/Festschrift/Festschrift.php.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne, Maurer, Philippe, Haspelmath, Martin and Huber, Magnus (eds.). 2013. The atlas of Pidgin and Creole language structures. Oxford University Press. Available online at: http://apics-online.info/.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1988a. Lexical categories and the evolution of number marking. In Hammond, Michael and Noonan, Michael (eds.), Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics, pp. 211–34. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1988b. The grammaticization of coordination. In Haiman, John and Thompson, Sandra (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, pp. 331–59. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A. 1978a. Agreement. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of human language, Vol. IV: Syntax, pp. 331–74. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A. 1978b. Reduplicative constructions. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of human language, Vol. III: Word structure, pp. 297–334. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A. 1978c. On the distribution of ergative and accusative patterns. Lingua 45: 233–79.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A. 2003. A semantic analysis of associative plurals. Studies in Language 27(3): 469–503.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A. 2009. Partonomic structures in syntax. In Evans, Vyvyan and Pourcel, Stéphanie (eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics, pp. 269–85. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Moyse-Faurie, Claire and Lynch, John. 2004. Coordination in Oceanic languages and in Proto-Oceanic. In Haspelmath, Martin (ed.), Coordinating constructions, pp. 445–97. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter and Harré, Rom. 1990. Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 2013. The origin and evolution of case-suppletive pronouns: Eurasian evidence. In Bakker, et al. (eds.), pp. 313–45.Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann. 1999. Whales, candlelight and stuff like that. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pelletier, Francis Jeffry. 2010. Lexical nouns are both +Mass and +Count, but they are neither +Mass nor +Count. In Massam, (ed.), pp. 9–26.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 1987. Number neutralization in Old English: Failure of functionalism? In Koopman, William, van der Leek, Frederike, Fischer, Olga and Eaton, Roger (eds.), Explanation and linguistic change, pp. 177–238. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 1989. On Humboldt on the dual. In Corrigan, Roberta, Eckman, Fred and Noonan, Michael (eds.), Linguistic categorization, pp. 293–333. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans and Schellinger, Wolfgang. 1997. The uneven distribution of genders over numbers: Greenberg Nos. 37 and 45. Linguistic Typology 1(1): 53–101.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland and Steinbach, Markus. 2006. Pluralization in sign and in speech: A cross-modal typological study. Linguistic Typology 10(2): 135–82.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Linda. 1988. Asymmetric feature distribution in pronominal ‘coordinations’. In Barlow, Michael and Ferguson, Charles A. (eds.), Agreement in natural language, pp. 237–49. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Seiler, Hansjakob. 1986. Apprehension: Language, object, and order. Part III: The universal dimension of apprehension. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Senft, Gunter (ed.). 2000. Systems of nominal classification. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna and Bakker, Dik. 2013. Suppletion in person forms: The role of iconicity and frequency. In Bakker, et al. (eds.), pp. 347–95.Google Scholar
Simon, Horst J. 2005. Only you? Philological investigations into the alleged inclusive-exclusive distinction in the second person plural. In Filimonova, (ed.), pp. 113–50.Google Scholar
Southern, Mark R. V. 2005. Contagious couplings: Transmission of expressives in Yiddish echo phrases. Westport, CT and London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 2000. AND-languages and WITH-languages. Linguistic Typology 4(1): 1–54.Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 2005. Noun phrase conjunction. In Haspelmath, et al. (ed.), pp. 258–61.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas and Veselinova, Ljuba N.. 2005. Ordinal numerals. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 218–21.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Stroh, Cornelia and Urdze, Aina. 2005. Comitatives and instrumentals. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds.), pp. 214–17.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Stroh, Cornelia and Urdze, Aina. 2006. On comitative and related categories: A typological study with special focus on the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tversky, Barbara. 1990. Where partonomies and taxonomies meet. In Tsohatzidis, Savas L. (ed.), Meanings and prototypes, pp. 334–44. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Xrakovskij, Viktor S. 1997. Semantic types of plurality and their natural classification. In Xrakovskij, Viktor S. (ed.), Typology of iterative constructions, pp. 3–64. Munich and Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard. 2009. Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, Laurel J. 1984. A grammar of Kiowa. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1988. Oats and wheat: Mass nouns, iconicity, and human categorization. In The semantics of grammar, pp. 499–560. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike. 2003. Numbers, language, and the human mind. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike. 2012. Collectives in the intersection of mass and count nouns: A cross-linguistic account. In Massam, (ed.), pp. 54–74.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2012. Decompositing the mass/count distinction: Evidence from languages that lack it. In Massam, (ed.), pp. 146–71.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike, Ernesto, Cesar Delgado, Escobedo, Dikyuva, Hasan, Panda, Sibaju and de Vos, Connie. 2013. Cardinal numerals in rural sign language: approaching cross-modal typology. Linguistic Typology 17(3): 357–96.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1977. Hierarchies of person. In Beach, W. A., Fox, S. E. and Philosoph, S. (eds.), Papers from the thirteenth regional meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, April 14–16, 1977, pp. 714–33. Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar